Five-factor personality questionnaire. NEO FFI scales and subscales

Extraversion Scale

score

norm

Neuroticism Scale

score

norm

Psychotic Scale

score

norm

Lie Scale

score

norm

Five-factor personality questionnaire (abbreviated version, Big5)

Instruction

Here are a number of characteristics that, to one degree or another, correspond (or do not correspond) to you. For example, do you agree with the statement that you are a person who likes to spend time in a company? Please, next to each statement on the form, circle the number that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement:

1 Strongly disagree 2 Rather disagree 3 Difficult to say 4 Rather agree 5 Strongly agree

It seems to me that I am a person who:
1. talkative

2. tend to find fault with others

3. conscientiously does his job

4. often sad, depressed

5. full of new ideas, original

6. reserved

7. Responsive and unselfish

8. can be somewhat frivolous

9. easily cope with stress, calm

10. loves to learn everything new

11. energetic, active

12. can start a quarrel

13. an employee you can rely on

14. sometimes tense

15. smart, thoughtful

16. full of enthusiasm

17. easily forgives offenses

18. sometimes disorganized

19. often worries

20. has a developed imagination

21. usually quiet and silent

22. trusting

23. often lazy

24. emotionally stable, it is difficult to upset him with anything

25. resourceful

26. confident, assertive

27. sometimes unsociable, cold

28. Finishes what you start

29. prone to frequent mood swings

30. Appreciates aesthetics and art

31. sometimes shy and withdrawn

32. kind and considerate to everyone

33. diligently performs any work

34. remains calm even in stressful situations

35. Prefers monotonous work

36. sociable, open

37. can sometimes be rude to others

38. plans his affairs and follows his plans

39. easily loses his temper

40. likes to think about something

41. has little interest in art

42. enjoys collaborating with other people

43. easily distracted

44. well versed in art, music or literature

Rating scale (“R” stands for reciprocal score)

Extraversion: 1, 6R, 11, 16, 21R, 26, 31R, 36

Friendliness: 2R, 7, 12R, 17, 22, 27R, 32, 37R, 42

Consciousness: 3, 8R, 13, 18R, 23R, 28, 33, 38, 43R

Neuroticism: 4, 9R, 14, 19, 24R, 29, 34R, 39

Openness to experience: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35R, 40, 41R, 44

question number	Your reply	question number	Your reply	question number	Your reply	question number	Your reply
1.	1 2 3 4 5	12.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
2.	1 2 3 4 5	13.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
	1 2 3 4 5	14.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
4.	1 2 3 4 5	15.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
5.	1 2 3 4 5	16.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
6.	1 2 3 4 5	17.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
7.	1 2 3 4 5	18.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
8.	1 2 3 4 5	19.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
9.	1 2 3 4 5	20.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
10.	1 2 3 4 5	21.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5
11.	1 2 3 4 5	22.	1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5		1 2 3 4 5

Full name of the technique: Five-factor personality questionnaire (abbreviated version)

Short description: Despite the fact that the questionnaire was created as a means of measuring "normal personality traits", the authors suggest that it will be useful in the clinical and applied fields of activity, as well as in scientific research.

The questionnaire was designed for an honest and cooperative subject and does not contain scales designed to test the veracity of answers. Therefore, it is very important to properly instruct the subject.

Literary source: Psychological support of work with the leading personnel of the internal affairs bodies: Methodological guide. - M .: GUK of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2003. - 211 p., pp. 67-69.

Scales: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, Accommodating, Consciousness.

Instruction

This test questionnaire contains 60 statements. Read each statement carefully. For each statement, choose the answer that best reflects your opinion. Please mark your choice of answer:

1. Strongly disagree 2. Disagree 3. Don't care 4. Agree 5. Strongly agree

1. I am not an anxious person.
2. I like it when there are a lot of people around me.
3. I don't like to spend time dreaming about something.
4. I try to be friendly with everyone I meet.
5. I keep my things clean and tidy.
6. I often feel that I am inferior to others.
7. It's easy for me to laugh.
8. I try to always stick to the same way of doing things.
9. I often quarrel with my family members and acquaintances.
10. I can always set myself a good pace in my work.
11. I sometimes feel like I'm "falling apart" when I'm under a lot of stress.
12. I don't consider myself a very joyful person.
13. I am fascinated by the images I find in art or nature.
14. Some people consider me selfish and selfish.
15. I am not a disciplined person.
16. I rarely feel unhappy.
17. I really love talking to people.
18. I think that lecturers' controversial statements can only confuse and mislead students.
19. I would rather cooperate with other people than compete with them.
20. I try to do all the tasks that I am given in good faith.
21. I often feel tense and very nervous.
22. I like to be where something is happening.
23. Poetry makes little or no impression on me at all.

24. I tend to be cynical and skeptical about other people's intentions.
25. I have a clear set of goals and systematically work towards them.
26. Sometimes I feel like an absolutely worthless person.
27. I usually prefer to work alone.
28. I really like to try unusual dishes.
29. I think that most people will use a person if it benefits them.
30. I lose a lot of time before getting to work.
31. I rarely feel fear or anxiety.
32. I often feel overwhelmed with energy.
33. I rarely notice the moods or feelings that different environments evoke.
34. Most of my acquaintances love me.
35. I work hard to achieve my goals.
36. I often get angry at the way people treat me.
37. I am a cheerful, lively person.
38. I think that in order to solve personal problems, one should sometimes turn to authorities.
39. Some people consider me cold and calculating.
40. When I make a commitment, I can definitely be relied upon.
41. Too often, when things go wrong, I lose heart and give up what I started.
42. I am not a cheerful optimist.
43. When I read poetry or look at a work of art, sometimes I feel trembling or intense excitement.
44. In my views I am practical and cold.
45. Sometimes I am not as efficient and reliable as I should be.
46. I rarely feel sad or depressed.
47. My life is fast paced.
48. I have little interest in reasoning about the nature of the world or the state of mankind.
49. I usually try to be caring and considerate.
50. I am a hardworking person who always gets the job done.
51. I often feel helpless and want someone else to solve my problems.
52. I am a very active person.
53. Most of my acquaintances consider me a very inquisitive person.
54. If I don't like people, I let them know.
55. It seems to me that I will never be able to become an organized person.
56. I was often ashamed.
57. I would rather go my own way than lead other people.
58. I often enjoy playing with theories and abstract ideas.
59. If I need to, I am ready to manipulate people to get what I want.
60. I strive for excellence in everything I do.

Key

Answer No.	Number of points
Neuroticism, score =












Extraversion, score =












Openness to experience, sum of points =












Liveliness, sum of points =












Consciousness, score =

QUESTIONNAIRE OF LEONHARD

You are offered statements and questions concerning your character. If you agree with the statement or answer the question “yes”, then put a “+” sign in the form under its number, but if you disagree or answer “no”, then the sign “-”. You should not think about the answers for a long time, there are no right and wrong answers here.

1. You are more likely to be in a cheerful and carefree mood.

2. You are sensitive to insults.

3. Does it happen that tears come to your eyes in the cinema, theater, in conversation, etc.?

4. Having done something, you doubt whether everything is done right, and do not calm down until you are sure of it again.

5. As a child, you were as brave as others of your age.

6. Do you often have a sharp mood change from a state of boundless glee to disgust for life, for yourself?

7. Are you usually the center of attention in society, in a company?

8. Does it happen that you are in such a grouchy mood for no reason that it is better not to talk to you?

9. You are a serious person.

10. Are you able to admire, admire something?

11. Are you enterprising?

12. You quickly forget if someone offends you.

13. Are you soft-hearted?

14. When dropping a letter into a box, do you check by running your hand over the slot of the box that the letter has fallen into it?

16. When you were a child, were you scared during a thunderstorm or when you met an unfamiliar dog (or maybe you still have such a feeling now)?

17. You strive to keep order in everything and everywhere.

18. Your mood depends on external circumstances.

19. Do your friends love you?

20. Do you often have a feeling of inner unrest, a feeling of possible trouble, misfortune?

21. You often have a somewhat depressed mood.

22. Have you ever experienced a tantrum or a nervous breakdown?

23. Do you find it difficult to sit still for a long time?

24. If you have been treated unfairly, you usually find it necessary to vigorously defend your interests.

25. Can you slaughter a chicken or a sheep?

26. It annoys you if a curtain or tablecloth hangs unevenly at home, and you immediately try to fix it.

27. As a child, you were afraid to be alone at home.

28. Do you often have unreasonable mood swings?

29. You strive to be highly skilled in your profession.

30. Do you quickly get angry or angry?

31. Can you be completely carefree?

32. Does it happen that a feeling of complete happiness literally permeates you?

33. Do you think you would make a host in a humorous concert?

34. You usually express your opinion quite frankly, directly and unambiguously.

35. It is difficult for you to bear the sight of blood, it makes you feel uncomfortable.

36. Do you enjoy working with a lot of personal responsibility?

37. You tend to speak out in defense of persons against whom injustice has been committed.

38. Would you be afraid to go down into a dark basement?

39. You prefer work in which you have to act quickly, but the requirements for the quality of execution are low.

40. Are you sociable?

41. At school, you willingly recited poetry.

42. Did you run away from home as a child?

43. Do you find life difficult?

44. Does it happen that after a conflict, resentment, you were so upset that going to work seemed simply unbearable?

45. Can you say that when you fail, you do not lose your sense of humor?

46. If someone offended you, would you take the first steps towards reconciliation?

47. You are very fond of animals.

48. You sometimes come back to make sure that you left your home or workplace in order, and nothing unforeseen happened there.

49. You are sometimes haunted by a vague idea that something terrible can happen to you or your loved ones.

50. Do you feel that your mood is very changeable?

51. Do you find it difficult to speak in front of a large number of people?

52. You can hit the offender if he offends you.

53. You have a very great need to communicate with other people.

54. You are one of those who, when disappointed, falls into deep despair.

55. You like work that requires vigorous organizational activity.

56. You have enough perseverance to achieve your goal, despite the fact that you have to overcome many obstacles on the way to it.

57. A tragic film can move you so that tears come to your eyes.

58. Do you often find it difficult to fall asleep because the problems of the past or future day are spinning in your head all the time?

59. At school, you prompted or let your comrades write off.

60. You would need a great effort of will to go through the cemetery alone at night.

61. Do you carefully ensure that every thing at home is always in its place?

62. Does it happen that you go to bed in the evening in a good mood, and the next morning you get up in a depressed mood, which lasts almost all day?

63. Do you easily get used to new situations?

64. Do you have headaches?

65. You often laugh.

66. You can be friendly even with those whom you clearly do not appreciate and do not respect.

67. You are an active person.

68. You are very worried about injustice.

69. You love nature so much that you can call it your friend.

70. When you leave home or go to bed, do you check if the gas is turned off, if the lights are off, if the doors are locked?

71. You are very fearful.

72. Does your mood change when you drink alcohol?

73. In your youth, you willingly participated in amateur performances.

74. You regard life somewhat pessimistically, without expectation of joy.

75. Do you often feel like traveling?

76. Your mood can change so dramatically that the state of joy is suddenly replaced by gloom and depression.

77. Do you easily manage to cheer up friends in the company?

78. How long do you experience resentment?

79. How long do you experience the sorrows of other people?

80. As a schoolboy, you often rewrote a page if you accidentally put an inkblot on it.

81. You treat people with caution and distrust rather than gullibility.

82. Do you often have nightmares?

83. Do you sometimes fear that you will throw yourself under the wheels of a passing train or fall out of a window located on a high floor?

84. In a cheerful company, you are usually cheerful.

85. Are you able to distract yourself from difficult problems that require your solution?

86. You become less reserved and feel freer under the influence of alcohol.

87. In a conversation, you are stingy with words.

88. If you had to act on stage, you could get into the role so much that you forget that this is just a game.

Answer sheet

DESCRIPTION OF ACCENTUATIONS ACCORDING TO LEONHARD-LICHKO:

1) Hyperthymic- increased mood background in combination with a thirst for activity, high activity, enterprise.

2) Excitable- increased impulsivity, weakening of control over impulses and drives.

3) Emotive- sensitivity, impressionability, depth of experience in the field of subtle emotions in spiritual life.

4) Pedantic- rigidity, inertia, long experience of traumatic events.

5) Anxious- a high level of anxiety, a tendency to fear, increased timidity and fearfulness.

6) Cyclothymic- periodic change of hyperthymic (elevated mood, activity) and dysthymic (low mood, lethargy) phases.

7) Demonstrative- demonstrative, theatrical behavior, egocentrism, a thirst for constant attention to one's person.

8) Unbalanced- weak will, restlessness, a tendency to idleness and entertainment, cowardice, lack of initiative.

9) Distimnaya- reduced mood background, fixation on the gloomy aspects of life, ideomotor retardation.

10) Exalted- a wide range of emotional states, a tendency to easily become delighted with some events and completely despair of others.

KEY

The questionnaire contains 10 scales reflecting the types of accentuations. In the key, the numbers mean the numbers of the scales. If the answer of the subject coincides with the “+” or “-” sign in the cell after the scale number, he is given one point on this scale. When calculating the test results, the total points scored on each scale are multiplied by the specified coefficient.
SCALE

1- Hyperthymia

3 - Emotivity

Multiply the resulting amount by 2

5 - Anxiety

7- Demonstrative

Multiply the resulting amount by 3

9 - Distimacy

Multiply the resulting amount by 6

Questionnaire Mini-mult (abbreviated version of MMPI)

MMPI was proposed by American psychologists in the 1940s and 1950s. Adaptation was carried out in the USSR in the 60s at the Institute. V. N. Bekhterev F. B. Berezin and M. P. Miroshnikov. The Mini-mult questionnaire is an abbreviated version of MMPI, it contains 71 questions, 11 scales, 3 of them are evaluative. The first 3 rating scales measure the sincerity of the subject, the degree of reliability of the test results and the amount of correction introduced by excessive caution. The remaining 8 scales are basic and assess personality traits. The time of the survey is not limited. (More in the appendix)

Instruction:Now you will get acquainted with the statements concerning the state of your health and your character. Read each statement and decide if it is true or false for you. Don't waste time thinking. The most natural solution is the one that comes to mind first.

1. Do you have a good appetite?
2. In the mornings, you usually feel that you have slept and rested.
3. There are a lot of interesting things in your daily life.
4. You work under a lot of pressure.
5. From time to time such bad thoughts come to your mind that it is better not to talk about them.
6. You rarely get constipated.
7. Sometimes you really wanted to leave home forever.
8. At times you have fits of uncontrollable laughter or crying.
9. At times you are bothered by nausea and vomiting.
10. You have the impression that no one understands you.
11. Sometimes you feel like cursing.
12. You have nightmares every week.
13. You find it harder to focus than most people.
14. Strange things have happened (or are happening) to you.
15. You would have achieved so much more in life if people weren't against you.
16. As a child, you at one time committed theft.
17. It happened that for several days, weeks or whole months you could not do anything, because it was difficult to force yourself to get involved in the work.
18. You have interrupted and restless sleep.
19. When you are among people, you hear strange things.
20. Most people who know you do not consider you an unpleasant person.
21. You often had to obey someone who knew less than you.
22. Most people are more satisfied with their lives than you are.
23. Many people exaggerate their misfortunes in order to gain sympathy and help.
24. Sometimes you get angry.
25. You definitely lack self-confidence.
26. You often feel like you did something wrong or not good.
27. Your health and well-being may worsen if people criticize you, demand too much from you.
28. Usually you are satisfied with your fate.
29. Some people like to command so much that you want to do everything in defiance, although you know that they are right.
30. You think that they are plotting something against you.
31. Most people are able to achieve benefits in a not entirely honest way.
32. You often have stomach problems.
33. Often you cannot understand why you were in a bad mood and annoyed the day before.
34 At times your thoughts flowed so fast that you didn't have time to speak them.
35. You think that your family life is no worse than that of most of your acquaintances.
36. At times you are sure of your own worthlessness.
37. In recent years, your health has been mostly good.
38. Have you had periods during which you did something and then could not remember what it was.
39. You feel that you have often been unfairly punished.
40. You have never felt better than now.
41. You don't care what others think of you.
42. Everything is fine with your memory.
43. You find it difficult to keep up a conversation with a person you have just met.
44. Most of the time you feel general weakness.
45. You rarely get headaches.
46. Sometimes it was difficult for you to keep your balance when walking.
47. Not all of your acquaintances like you.
48. There are people who try to steal your ideas and thoughts.
49. You think that you have done things that cannot be forgiven.
50. You think you are too shy.
51. You almost always worry about something.
52. Your parents often did not approve of your dating.
53. Sometimes you gossip a little.
54. At times you feel that it is unusually easy for you to make decisions.
55. You have a strong heartbeat, and you often suffocate.
56. You are quick-tempered, but quick-tempered.
57. You have periods of such anxiety that it is difficult to sit still.
58. Your parents and other family members often pick on you.
59. Nobody is particularly interested in your fate.
60. You do not judge a person who is not averse to taking advantage of the mistakes of another.
61. Sometimes you are full of energy.
62. Your eyesight has deteriorated lately.
63. You often have ringing or buzzing in your ears.
64. There have been times in your life (perhaps only one) when you felt that you were being hypnotized.
65. You have periods when you are unusually cheerful for no particular reason.
66. Even being in society, you usually feel lonely.
67. You think that almost everyone can lie to avoid trouble.
68. You feel sharper than most other people.
69. At times your head seems to work slower than usual.
70. You are often disappointed in people.
71. You abused alcohol.

B 1 N	B 17 N	B 33 N	B 49 N	At 65N
B 2 N	At 18 N	B 34 N	B 50 N	B 66H
B 3 N	At 19 N	B 35 N	B 51 N	B 67H
B 4 N	B 20 N	B 36 N	B 52 N	B 68H
B 5 N	B 21 N	B 37 N	B 53 N	B 69H
B 6 N	B 22 N	B 38 N	B 54 N	At 70N
B 7 N	B 23 N	B 39 N	B 55 N	B 71H
B 8 N	B 24 N	B 40 N	B 56 N
B 9 N	B 25 N	B 41 N	B 57 N
B 10 N	B 26 N	B 42 N	B 58 N
B 11 N	B 27 N	B 43 N	B 59 N
V 12 N	B 28 N	B 44 N	B 60 N
B 13 N	B 29 N	B 45 N	B 61 N
B 14 N	B 30 N	B 46 N	B 62 N
B 15 N	B 31 N	B 47 N	B 63 N
B 16 N	B 32 N	B 48 N	B 64 N

Scales	Answers	question number
L	False (N)	5, 11, 24, 47, 53
F	H	22, 24, 61
Right (B)	9, 12, 15, 19, 30, 38, 48, 49, 58, 59, 64, 71
K	H	11, 23, 31 , 33, 34, 36, 40, 41, 43, 51, 56, 61, 65, 67, 69, 70
1 (Hs)	H	1, 2, 6, 37, 45
AT	9, 18, 26, 32, 44, 46, 55, 62, 63
2(D)	H	1, 3, 6, 11, 28, 37, 40, 42, 60, 65, 71
AT	9, 13, 17, 18, 22, 25, 36, 44
3(Well)	H	1, 2, 3, 11, 23, 28, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 40, 41, 43, 45, 50, 56
AT	9, 13, 18, 26, 44, 46, 55, 57, 62
4 (Pd)	H	3, 28, 34, 35, 41, 43, 50, 65
AT	7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, 27, 52, 58, 71
5 (Pa)	H	28, 29, 31, 67
AT	5, 8, 10, 15, 30, 39, 63, 64, 66, 68
6 (pt)	H	2, 3, 42
AT	5, 8, 13, 17, 22, 25, 27, 36, 44, 51 , 57, 66, 68
7(sc)	H	3, 42
AT	5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 30, 38, 39, 46, 57, 63, 64, 66
8(Ma)	H
AT	4, 7, 8, 21, 29, 34, 38, 39, 54, 57, 60

The problem of selecting reliable and effective psychodiagnostic methods for studying the personality of police officers has always been relevant and, apparently, will remain so for quite a long time. The reasons for this are different and are due to a number of objective, subjective and situational factors. Thus, the requirement of economy brings to the fore psychological examinations with minimal time spent on their conduct, processing and interpretation of psychodiagnostic information. The lack of a differentiated approach in the choice of normative data reduces the predictive capabilities of psychological conclusions. The diagnostic criteria for special applications of personality study tools have not been sufficiently developed, for example, for solving the problems of psychological examination during admission to service with weapons of traffic police officers, commandant units, etc.

Without exaggeration, it can be argued that one of the effective diagnostic methods is the Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire ( NEO Five- factor Inventory, Big Five, "Big Five", or "Big Five Markers", Costa & McCrae). The questionnaire or FFI is designed for a comprehensive study of the personality of employees based on measuring its five basic factors: “neuroticism” (Neuroticism, N), “extroversion” (Extraversion, E), “openness to experience” (Openness to experience, O), “consent” / "accommodating" / "goodwill" (Agreeableness, A) and "consciousness" (Conscientiousness, C). It was the analysis of the practice of using this questionnaire, its renormalization and assessment of the possibilities that were the purpose of our study.

In a longitudinal study conducted in 2007–2015, students of the VIPK of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and some other educational organizations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, police officers (a total of 1748 people; men - 85.3%, women - 14.7%) took part.

The examination was carried out using the automated complex AWP "Psychotest" (PsychoTest) . Statistical processing of psychodiagnostic data included the calculation of mean values and standard deviations (Table 1) for each of the scales.

Table 1

Regulatory data NEO-FFI

Scale		police officers, male, female (1748 people)			commandant staff, husband. (65 people), female (51 people)
		*X cf*		s X	*X cf*	s X





	Scale		traffic police officers, husband. (785 people), women. (15 people)		police driver, husband. (116 people)

			*X cf*	s X	*X cf*	s X

The updated (received by us) data have statistically significant differences from the norms currently used in departmental psychodiagnostic practice. Thus, all normative indicators were significantly reduced, which led to an unreasonable overestimation of the results. For example, the Conscientiousness factor in 100% of the subjects always took high and ultra-high values (Fig. 1). 70% of employees had 9 stanes, which, from the point of view of psychometrics for the general sample, does not correspond to reality.

The recalculation of primary data (1748 people), taking into account the new norms, significantly brought the distribution closer to normal (Gaussian). As a consequence, the resulting (new) scale "C" has high differential capabilities. Similar conclusions are valid for other FFI factors.

Rice. one. Distribution of the indicator "Consciousness" (Conscientiousness, C)

In addition to the main scales, five diagnostic indices, designed to solve special problems of psychological selection and support of professional activities .

1. The index "Psychological readiness to serve with weapons" assesses the degree of formation of professionally important personality traits that determine the reliability of professional activity when serving with weapons. The leading psychological characteristics are: responsibility, organization, discipline, sense of duty, self-confidence, restraint, friendliness and pragmatism. Readiness for activity and service with weapons is associated with the harmonious psychological state of the individual.

2. Index " Additional attention from a psychologist» identifies individuals whose personality traits determine an increased likelihood of maladjustment states not only in stressful or extreme, but also in normal service conditions, which potentially contributes to the development of neuropsychiatric and psychosomatic diseases, antisocial (delinquent) behavior, auto-aggression, leads to decrease in the efficiency and reliability of professional activity. These are people who need increased psychological attention, as well as those who need additional support in professional development, personality formation and development, and mental health maintenance.

3. Index " Psychological fitness for service in extreme conditions» is designed to diagnose individual psychological characteristics that determine the reliability and success of employees' professional activities in extreme situations.

4. Index " Adaptive (professional-psychological) potential of an individual» (adaptability) diagnoses a complex of individual psychological characteristics that determine effective interaction with the professional environment that is adequate to the requirements of the changed situation without excessive mental stress. Adaptability takes into account the presence of regulatory mental qualities that determine behavior adequate to the given conditions of the "external" environment, effective interaction with it, and the optimal level of neuropsychic stress.

5. Index " The degree of professional deformity of the personality» evaluates changes in the personality characteristics of the individual in the asocial direction, resulting from the impact of negative features of the content, organization and conditions of professional activity. External forms of manifestation of professional deformation of a personality can be different: increased conflict, lack of motivation to work, a significant decrease in the effectiveness of professional activity, systematic violations of service discipline, etc.

The accuracy of the above indices was studied by the method of comparison with expert estimates (Table 2).

table 2

Accuracy of Special Indexes

Index	Gradation / Accuracy (%)
Index
Index "Psychological readiness to serve with weapons"(W)
Index "Additional attention from a psychologist"(V)
Index "Psychological fitness for service in extreme conditions"(X)
Index "Adaptive potential of the individual"(R)
Index "The degree of professional deformity of the personality"(D)

Sufficiently high rates of predictive assessments (more than 80%) allow us to assert that the indices accurately indicate the presence or absence of relevant issues, as well as the specifics of the service. At the same time, predictive capabilities, as a rule, turn out to be higher in “polar” gradations (1 or 3).

Thus, the scientific study we conducted made it possible to evaluate the effectiveness and clarify the normative indicators of the Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire, to formulate proposals for improving the technology of working with it. We believe that the capabilities of this toolkit can significantly expand the scope of its application, for example, in studying the personality of employees who demonstrate certain types of deviant behavior, in individualizing the forms and methods of psychological training and assistance, and in predicting professional and personal development.

A five-factor personality questionnaire, better known as the "Big Five" ("Magnificent Five") was developed in 1983-1985. American psychologists R. McCrae and P. Costa. Subsequently, the questionnaire was improved and in its final form in 1992 it was presented by the NEO PI test (from the English "neuroticism, extraversion, openness - a personality questionnaire").

According to the authors, the five independent variables identified on the basis of factor analysis (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, cooperation, conscientiousness) are quite enough to adequately describe the psychological portrait of a person.

This article presents a version of the adaptation of 5PFQ (compiled by Hiijiro Teuin) adapted by A.B. Khromov.

The five-factor personality questionnaire is a set of 75 paired, opposite in meaning, stimulus statements that characterize human behavior. The stimulus material has a five-point Likert rating scale (-2; -1; 0; 1; 2), which can be used to measure the severity of each of the five factors (extroversion - introversion; attachment - isolation; self-control - impulsiveness; emotional instability - emotional stability ; expressiveness - practicality).

Theoretical basis

The theoretical basis of the questionnaire is a five-factor personality model.

Five fundamental factors that make it possible to characterize the structure of a person's personality were identified as a result of scientific research by psychologists from different countries (G. Allport, D. Gilford, R. Cattell, G. Eysenck, R. McCray, P. Costa, etc.) for five decades. These factors include:

"neuroticism" (neuroticism, N),
”extraversion” (extraversion, E),
“openness to experience” (openness to experience, O),
"consent" (agreebleness, A),
"consciousness" (conscientiousness, C).

R. McCrae and P. Costa used the following terms to designate five factors: 1. neuroticism, 2. extraversion, 3. openness to experience, 4. cooperation, 5. conscientiousness.

Adaptations and modifications

In the Russian translation, the questionnaire was adapted to the conditions of Russian culture by V. E. Orl in collaboration with A. A. Rukavishnikov and I. G. Senin. The Japanese version of the "Big Five" 5PFQ, (compiled by Hiijiro Teuin), which was also translated and adapted in 1995-1999, is known. to the domestic conditions of the social environment by psychologists of the Kurgan State University (A. B. Khromov).

Procedure

Instruction

Before you is a questionnaire consisting of 75 statements that are opposite in meaning, each of which reveals important personality traits and features of human behavior in certain life situations.

In this questionnaire, there are no statements right or wrong, just as there are no “good” or “bad” personality traits, so all 75 statements should be evaluated.

All stimulus phrases are separated by an evaluation scale. Read the statement carefully and determine which part of it best suits your personality. If you think that it is left, then use the symbols -2 and -1 of the scale for evaluation, if you think that it is right, then use the right side of the scale (+2 and +1). In numbers you will reflect the degree of severity of the trait being evaluated: 2 - strongly pronounced, 1 - weakly expressed, if you are in doubt about the choice, then choose 0.

All scores are entered in the left cell of the answer sheet.

Results processing

Estimated values of statements are converted into points in accordance with the following table:

Point estimates are put down in the answer sheet in the right cells of the corresponding statements. Each of the main (secondary) five factors consists of five primary factors. For example, the main factor "extroversion - introversion" consists of primary factors 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5.

In quantitative terms, the primary factors are determined by summing up the three scores. For example, the primary factor 1.1 "activity - passivity" is estimated by the sum of points received for statements 1, 6, 11.

The summation of the scores of the primary factors along the vertical determines the quantitative expression of the corresponding main factor. For example, the sum of scores of primary factors 1.1, 1.2,1.3, 1.4, 1.5 determines the quantitative expression of the first main (secondary) factor "extraversion - introversion" (see Answer Form).

Regulatory data

The table below shows the norms of assessments on the scales of the five-factor questionnaire obtained during testing of adults and adolescents of both sexes, using which it is possible to transfer the test values of the factors of a particular subject to the T-scale. On the basis of the values of secondary and primary factors translated into one scale, it is possible to display in graphical form the psychological profile of the individual.

The T-score is calculated using the following formula:

T = 50 + \frac(10 (X - M))(S.D.)

where M is the arithmetic mean, S. D. is the standard deviation.

Factors		girls		girls		boys		young men
		14 -17 years old		18-23 years old		14 -17 years old		18-23 years old
		N-87		N-219		N-58		N-98
		M	S.D.	M	S.D.	M	S.D.	M	S.D.
Secondary factors
1.0	Extraversion - Introversion	55.7	9.1	52.4	7.9	50.8	8.4	49.1	8.5
2.0	Attachment - Separation	47.5	11.1	50.1	9.1	47.8	9.8	49.4	8.7
3.0	Control - Naturalness	51.7	9.8	49.8	9.8	49.3	12.0	47.8	9.8
4.0	Emotionality - Restraint	49.3	11.9	48.7	9.8	42.6	9.5	42.9	11.4
5.0	Playfulness - Practicality	55.6	9.3	55.8	8.4	52.3	9.8	54.6	6.9
Primary Components
1.1	activity - passivity	11.1	2.6	10.7	2.5	10.9	2.7	10.6	2.4
1.2	dominance-subordination	10.0	2.7	10.1	2.6	10.7	2.1	9.4	2.6
1.3	sociability - isolation	11.8	3.2	10.7	3.0	10.6	3.1	9.5	2.7
1.4	search for impressions - avoidance	10.4	3.1	9.8	2.3	8.9	2.6	9.4	2.6
1.5	attracting attention - avoiding	11.8	2.4	11.0	2.5	9.9	3.1	10.3	2.5
2.1	warmth - indifference	9.8	3.4	10.3	2.8	10.1	2.7	10.4	2.3
2.2	cooperation - rivalries	8.9	3.6	9.9	2.5	9.7	3.8	10.0	2.7
2.3	gullibility - suspicion	7.8	3.3	8.1	2.6	7.6	3.0	8.1	2.3
2.4	understanding - misunderstanding	10.1	2.9	10.6	2.6	10.1	2.9	9.8	2.7
2.5	respect for others - self-respect	11.1	2.5	10.9	2.1	11.0	2.7	11.0	1.8
3.1	neatness - inaccuracy	11.4	2.6	10.3	2.7	10.8	2.7	9.6	2.5
3.2	perseverance - weakness	9.9	2.8	10.0	2.8	10.0	3.1	9.2	3.0
3.3	responsibility - irresponsibility	9.6	3.0	10.3	2.6	9.9	2.8	9.6	2.0
3.4	self-control - impulsiveness	10.6	3.5	9.3	2.8	10.1	3.1	9.9	2.5
3.5	forethought - carelessness	9.9	2.9	9.6	2.6	10.1	3.3	9.7	2.7
4.1	anxiety - carelessness	10.6	3.2	10.7	3.0	9.5	2.8	9.3	3.3
4.2	tension - relaxation	8.4	3.4	8.3	2.7	7.6	2.9	8.0	2.8
4.3	depression - emotional comfort	10.1	3.1	9.8	2.8	8.2	2.4	9.9	2.7
4.4	self-criticism - self-sufficiency	9.7	3.5	9.2	2.3	8.5	2.6	8.8	2.5
4.5	emotional lability - emotional stability	11.1	3.3	10.7	3.0	8.9	3.2	8.6	3.1
5.1	curiosity - conservatism	11.5	3.1	11.1	2.6	11.1	3.0	10.6	2.3
5.2	dreaminess - realism	10.9	2.7	11.5	2.7	10.0	2.9	11.7	2.6
5.3	artistry - non-artistic	10.8	3.1	11.9	2.4	9.9	2.8	10.8	2.7
5.4	sensitivity - insensitivity	11.1	2.5	11.5	2.1	10.4	2.7	10.9	2.4
5.5	plasticity - rigidity	10.2	2.4	10.0	2.4	9.5	2.9	10.1	2.4

Interpretation of results

Interpretation of the results of the questionnaire is based on the analysis of both primary and secondary (main factors). The following are the characterological features that can be determined in the subject using primary factors:

extraversion - introversion
1. Activity - passivity
2. dominance - subordination
3. Sociability - isolation
4. Seeking Impressions - Avoiding Impressions
5. Getting Attention - Avoiding Attention
Attachment - isolation
1. Warmth - indifference
2. Cooperation - rivalry
3. gullibility - suspicion
4. Understanding - misunderstanding
5. Respect for others is self-respect
Self-control - impulsiveness
1. Accuracy - sloppiness (lack of accuracy)
2. Perseverance - lack of perseverance
3. Responsibility - irresponsibility
4. Self-control of behavior - impulsivity (lack of self-control)
5. prudence - carelessness
Emotional stability - emotional instability
1. Anxiety - carelessness
2. Tension - relaxation
3. Depression - emotional comfort
4. Self-criticism - self-sufficiency
5. Emotional lability - emotional stability
Expressiveness - practicality
1. Curiosity - conservatism
2. Curiosity - realism
3. Artistry - lack of artistry
4. Sensitivity - insensitivity
5. Plasticity - rigidity

In each of the primary factors, the personality trait with high scores according to the Big Five is indicated on the left, while the personality trait with low scores is indicated on the right.

The sum of the scores of the primary factors along the vertical determines the quantitative expression of the main factor. The minimum number of points scored for any main factor is 15, the maximum number is 75. Conventionally, the scores can be divided into high (51-75 points), medium (41-50 points) and low (15-40 points).

Answer form

Literature

Khromov A.B. Five-factor personality questionnaire: Educational and methodological manual. - Kurgan: Publishing House of the Kurgan State. University, 2000. - 23 p.

Posted On 03/12/2018

The classic "brand" test-questionnaire with a rich history is designed for rapid diagnostics of the level of expression of the five so-called "big" factors of temperament and character. They received this name in the 60-80s in the course of large-scale statistical and psycholinguistic studies conducted by independent specialists from different countries. One of these works was a study of the Russian-language vocabulary of personality traits, published in the 1990s, conducted by A.G. Shmelev and V.I. Pokhilko. Studies have confirmed that five factors are enough to build a complete psychological portrait of a person.

career guidance;
self-knowledge.

For the selection and evaluation of personnel using the five big personality factors, we recommend the ipsative version of this test.

STRUCTURE OF THE METHOD

The "Big Five" methodology consists of 100 items, suggesting 3 response options ("true", "difficult to answer", "not true").

An example of a task for the Big Five test.

The test run time is 25-35 minutes. The first five scales of the methodology represent an exact reproduction of the Big Five factors in their international version. The test also includes a scale social desirability, measuring a respondent's honesty.

In the Russian-language version of the questionnaire, the five most powerful factors of temperament and character received the following interpretation:

extraversion - introversion(high pole of the factor - sociability, self-confidence, active position in communication; low - restraint, isolation)
consent - independence(this scale is an indicator of the style of interpersonal interaction; a high pole is a tendency to cooperate, cooperate, friendliness, to an extreme extent - a statement; low - a tendency to rely on one's own opinion, compete, compete with other people, extreme severity - hostility)
self-control - impulsiveness(high indicators reflect the presence of such a group of qualities as punctuality, consistency, the ability to follow an algorithm, a standard, the extreme degree is pedantry; low indicators are situational, inconsistent, the ability to go beyond standard schemes of actions, to an extreme degree - the flexibility of moral judgments and randomness)
emotional stability - anxiety(this scale reflects stability, speed of adaptation to stressful situations, calmness, stability, self-confidence - at the high pole of the scale, they are opposite to emotionality, susceptibility, anxiety, insecurity - at a low one)
innovation-conservatism(this scale shows curiosity, passion, openness to new experience, transformation orientation at a high pole; and conservatism, pragmatic orientation, traditionalism, preservation orientation at a low pole)

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

There are three report options:

For the respondent (a short and understandable description of the qualities of character, made in a friendly manner, without the use of professional terminology);
for a psychologist (an explanation of the reasons for the manifestation of the identified features, their correlation with other factor systems for describing a person);
business report (forecast of efficiency in various activities, description of the strengths and weaknesses of the respondent, forecast of conflict and behavior in a conflict situation).

Each report can include up to three blocks for presenting results in the form:

a graphical profile indicating the values of the factors;
text messages-interpretation factors;
tabular data that includes raw scores, walls, and percentiles (percentage of the standardization sample).

HISTORY OF CREATION

BIG FIVE (English Big Five) - five personality factors that were most often identified as stable factors by independent scientists in different countries in the course of large-scale statistical and psycholinguistic studies. One of these works was a study of the Russian-language vocabulary of personality traits, published in the 1990s, conducted by A.G. Shmelev and V.I. Pokhilko.

The Big Five test questions are the most informative tasks that were selected as a result of experimental work with a bank of 260 tasks conducted under the guidance of A.G. Shmelev by a group of graduate students and students of the Faculty of Psychology of Moscow State University. A significant part of the analytical work was done by E.I. Rykhlevskaya. More than 200 subjects, students of Moscow universities, took part in the psychometric experiment.

With the help of confirmatory factor analysis (an analysis aimed at checking already formed factor keys), 15 questions were identified for each factor, which gave the maximum correlation with the total score. In 2002, the methodology was supplemented with a scale of "social desirability" (version "B5S-Plus"), which increased the number of questions to 90. The version "B5S-Plus5" uses the scale of "social desirability", modified and improved by V.V. Odintsova in 2004-2005

In the sixth version of the methodology (2007), the 5th scale (“Learning-inertia”) was replaced by the more traditional Big Five scale “Innovation-conservatism”. Bank of tasks expanded to 100 questions. The author of the questions is Ivanova O.N. The norms in this version of the methodology were updated in 2008 based on the analysis of the protocols of the subjects in the examination situation.

In the seventh version (2009), a new business interpretation was added to the methodology, which describes not only the respondent's personal qualities, but also his professional potential in various activities, strengths and weaknesses, and conflict forecast.

PSYCHOMETRIC PARAMETERS

The reliability of the test as a means of measurement is determined by the low probability of measurement errors of test scores and the extent to which the measurement results are reproduced when the test is used repeatedly in relation to this group of subjects. The internal consistency of the test was assessed by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. This coefficient is a measure of reliability based on the homogeneity of the scale or the sum of the correlations between subjects' answers to questions within the same test form.

Reliability-consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient):

REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES

on the basis of this methodology, an on-line test was created to determine team roles for the site drimtim.ru (2009) http://drimtim.ru/tests/12/
together with the tests "STM", "TIPS" and a specially developed case methodology, it is used to evaluate candidates for the position of Head of a structural enterprise on the Moscow Railway (since 2009)
is part of the vocational guidance complex test "WORK"

PUBLICATIONS

"Zigzag, false square and ... nothing else", Shmelev A. G., HT.RU, 2008
"Analysis of situational differences in testing (on the example of the Big Five test questionnaire)", V. V. Odintsova, A. G. Shmelev, journal "Psychology Issues", 2006
"Test of humorous phrases: the results of a psychometric study using an evaluation version (TYUFO)", V. V. Odintsova, A. G. Shmelev, HT.RU, 2005
“Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Big Five test and an example of its practical use”, Odintsova V.V., HT.RU, 2004

EDUCATION

Training in working with the test methodology is available as a distance course. It is also possible individual (or in small groups) face-to-face training according to the program of individual user support. A methodological guide has been developed, which is supplied free of charge to all users of the test.

A five-factor personality questionnaire, better known as the "Big Five" ("Magnificent Five") was developed in 1983-1985. American psychologists R. McCrae and P. Costa. In the future, the questionnaire was improved; an improved version was published in 1992 under the name "NEO PI test" (from the English "neuroticism, extraversion, openness - personality questionnaire").

"neuroticism" (neuroticism, N),
”extraversion” (extraversion, E),
“openness to experience” (openness to experience, O),
"consent" (agreebleness, A) and
"consciousness" (conscientiousness, C).

Although researchers have already agreed on what these traits are, disagreements about their designation still remain.

R. McCrae and P. Costa used the following terms to designate five factors: 1. neuroticism, 2. extraversion, 3. openness to experience, 4. cooperation, 5. conscientiousness.

Japanese researcher Hiijiro Tsuyi, adapting the American five-factor personality technique for the Japanese population, proposed bipolarity for each factor: EXTRAVERSION - INTROVERSION, ATTENDANCE - SEPARATION, CONTROL - NATURALITY, EMOTIONALITY - EMOTIONAL RESTRICTION, PLAYFULNESS - PRACTICE, which allows, as he believes, characterize the personality more fully, since each pole of the trait reflects its originality.

The Japanese version of the "Big Five" is a set of 75 paired, opposite in meaning, stimulus statements that characterize human behavior. The stimulus material has a five-point Likert rating scale (-2; -1; 0; 1; 2) that can be used to measure the severity of each of the five factors.

According to his approach to the five-factor personality structure, Tsuyi characterizes the generalized trait-factors and their primary components as follows.

The first factor “EXTRAVERSION - INTROVERSION” is considered by H.

Five-factor personality questionnaire

Tsuyi is traditional, but unlike the interpretation proposed by W. Norman, the Japanese researcher takes into account the values of the poles of this factor, the primary components of which are: activity - passivity, dominance - subordination, sociability - isolation, search for new impressions - avoidance of new impressions.

The essence of the second factor is interaction with people. The term "ATTACHMENT" for a factor is better suited than "conformity" used in the American original, and includes such personality dispositions as friendliness, gullibility, cooperation, as well as dependence and acceptance of the individual by the group. The opposite pole of this factor “SEPARATION” contains not only signs of distancing and rivalry, but also of independence. The components of the second factor are: warmth - indifference, cooperation - rivalry, gullibility - suspicion, understanding - misunderstanding, respect for others - self-respect.

The third factor is presented as "CONTROL - NATURAL". Tsuyi intentionally does not use the term "consciousness" because it has too close an attachment to ethical concepts and too narrow a semantic meaning. The essence of the third factor is volitional regulation of behavior. An individual who controls himself, as a rule, shows purposefulness, conscientiousness, methodicalness and perseverance. A person who is natural in his behavior, on the contrary, strives for harmonious relations with nature, he, as it were, “floats with the flow of life”. The Japanese version of the five-factor personality questionnaire contains the following primary components of this factor: accuracy - carelessness, perseverance - lack of perseverance, responsibility - irresponsibility, self-control - impulsiveness, foresight - carelessness.

The fourth factor contains the characteristics of the affective sphere of personality. EMOTIONALITY in humans is manifested in increased sensitivity to environmental influences, especially in stressful situations. Such a person is also predisposed to anxiety and depression. EMOTIONAL RESTRAINT, on the contrary, characterizes a person as inclined to be accommodating, slow and self-sufficient. The components of the fourth factor are: anxiety - carelessness, tension - relaxation, depression - emotional comfort, self-criticism - self-sufficiency, emotional lability - emotional stability.

The fifth factor is presented as “PLAYFUL”. Its essence is a game that allows a person to smoothly “transition” from the real world to the unreal one, perceive unusual images, thoughts, feelings, symbolism of art and freely enjoy them. On the other hand, “PRACTICALITY” is a trait that manifests itself in a personality in a tendency to correspond to reality, which in its extreme manifestations leads to conformism, cruelty and authoritarianism. The primary components of this factor are: curiosity - conservatism, daydreaming - realism, artistry - unartistic, sensitivity - low sensitivity, plasticity - rigidity.

The "Big Five" is currently widely used by both foreign and domestic psychologists. There are two versions of the questionnaire in Russian. The first was adapted by V.E. Orl, A.A. Rukavishnikov and I.G. Senin.

The second is a translation and adaptation of the Japanese version of the Big Five (5PFQ); adaptation was performed by Associate Professor of Kurgan State University A. B. Khromov (http://osp.kgsu.ru/hromov.htm). It is this version of the five-factor personality questionnaire that is presented on the site.

Five-factor personality questionnaire ("Big Five") - testing online »

Five Factor Model of Personality, also known as the "Big Five" (Big Five) - a psychological model that describes the structure of a person's personality through five common, relatively independent features (dispositions):

« neuroticism» (neuroticism, N)
« extraversion» (extraversion, E)
« openness to experience» (openness to experience, O)
« consent/goodwill» (agreedness, A)
« conscientiousness/conscientiousness» (conscientiousness, C)

Currently, the five-factor model is the most widely used in the psychological research of English-speaking countries: by 2009, the citation frequency of the "big five" exceeded the use of the Eysenck and Cattell models combined by more than 50 times.

Unfortunately, most of the psychological tools that use the Big Five model are either commercial methods and are not freely available or have not been translated into Russian. At the moment, the only test available for passing is the Russian-language adaptation of A. B. Khromov of the Japanese adaptation 5PFQ.

Pass the test:

The following implementations of the Big Five are best known:

The most popular, most widely used questionnaire NEO PI developed since the 1980s by American psychologists P. Costa and R. McRae(Paul T. Costa Jr., Robert R. McCrae).

Five-factor personality questionnaire McCrae and Costa (Big Five)

Since 1992, NEO PI-R (260 questions) and NEO FFI (abbreviated, 60 questions) versions have been presented. There is a Russian-language adaptation of 2010 (V. E. Orel, A. A. Rukavishnikov, I. G. Senin, T. A. Martin).

. IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers(50 and 100 questions), IPIP NEO PI-R(120 and 300 questions) - free for non-commercial use implementations of the Big Five scales from the International Personality Item Pool. IPIP NEO PI-R is offered as an analogue ("shown to be mostly identical") of the commercial NEO PI. Not translated into Russian.

. The Big Five Inventory, BFI (Dr. Oliver P. John and colleagues) - one of the latest testing methods, uses sentence fragments as stimulus material. Available online for non-commercial use. Not translated into Russian.

Professional personality questionnaires OPQ/OPQ32(Occupational Personality Questionnaires) by SHL. One of the first commercial tools of the "Big Five", used in recruitment to assess the potential of various categories of employees. Since 1994, there has been a Russian-language adaptation.

Hogan personality questionnaire HPI(Hogan Personality Inventory) is one of the elements of the international system of Hogan assessment tools, used in the selection and assessment of personnel. There is a Russian version.

Literature | Description

Instruction

Read the paired statements and decide which of the two alternative statements suits you best. If the statement written to the left of the rating scale is suitable, then use the value "-2" or "-1" to evaluate this statement. If the right statement suits you, then it is evaluated by the values \u200b\u200bof "2" or "1". The values "-2" or "2" are chosen if the evaluated statement is expressed strongly. If this statement is expressed weakly (weaker), then the value "-1" or "1" is chosen. In the case when none of the alternatives suits you, but something in between suits, then the value "0" is selected.

The selected value is recorded in the answer sheet in the right cell.

The stimulus material of the Big Five Test.

1. I like to exercise	-2	-1	I don't like exercise
2. People consider me a sympathetic and friendly person	-2	-1	Some people think I'm cold and callous
3. I value cleanliness and order in everything.	-2	-1	Sometimes I let myself be sloppy
4. I often worry about the thought that something might happen.	-2	-1	The little things in life don't bother me
5. Everything new makes me interested	-2	-1	Often new things annoy me.
6. If I am not busy with anything, then it worries me.	-2	-1	I am a calm person and do not like to fuss
7. I try to be friendly to all people.	-2	-1	I am not always and not with everyone a friendly person
8. My room is always neatly tidy.	-2	-1	I don't try very hard to keep things clean and tidy.
9. Sometimes I get upset over trifles	-2	-1	I don't pay attention to small problems
10. Five-factor personality questionnaire 5PFQ I like surprises	-2	-1	I love the predictability of events
11. I can't stay still for long.	-2	-1	I don't like the fast lifestyle
12. I am considerate in dealing with other people.	-2	-1	Sometimes as a joke I hurt the pride of others
13. I am methodical and punctual in everything.	-2	-1	I'm not a very obliging person
14. My feelings are easily vulnerable and vulnerable.	-2	-1	I am rarely anxious and rarely afraid of anything.
15. I'm not interested when the answer is clear in advance.	-2	-1	I'm not interested in things that I don't understand
16. I like others to follow my orders quickly.	-2	-1	I'm slowly following other people's orders
17. I am a compliant and compromising person.	-2	-1	I like to argue with others
18. I persevere when tackling a difficult task.	-2	-1	I am not a very persistent person.
19. In difficult situations, I shrink from tension.	-2	-1	I can relax in any situation
20. I have a very vivid imagination.	-2	-1	I always prefer to see the world realistically
21. I often have to be a leader, take the initiative	-2	-1	I'm more of a subordinate than a leader
22. I am always ready to help and share other people's difficulties.	-2	-1	Everyone should be able to take care of themselves
23. I am a very diligent person in all matters.	-2	-1	I don't work very hard
24. I often have cold sweats and trembling hands.	-2	-1	I rarely experienced tension accompanied by tremors in my body.
25. I like to dream	-2	-1	I rarely get into fantasies
26. It often happens that I lead, give orders to other people	-2	-1	I prefer someone else to take the lead
27. I prefer to cooperate with others than to compete.	-2	-1	Society could not develop without competition
28. I take my work seriously and diligently.	-2	-1	I try not to take on extra responsibilities at work
29. I often get nervous in unusual surroundings.	-2	-1	I easily adapt to new surroundings
30. Sometimes I get deep in thought.	-2	-1	I don't like wasting my time thinking
31. I like talking to strangers	-2	-1	I am not a very sociable person
32. Most people are naturally kind.	-2	-1	I think life makes some people mean
33. People often trust me with responsible matters	-2	-1	Some people think I'm irresponsible
34. Sometimes I feel lonely, sad and everything falls out of my hands.	-2	-1	Often, when doing something, I get so carried away that I forget about everything.
35. I know well what beauty and elegance are	-2	-1	My idea of beauty is the same as everyone else's.
36. I like making new friends and acquaintances.	-2	-1	I prefer to have only a few reliable friends.
37. I usually like the people I hang out with.	-2	-1	There are people I don't like
38. I am demanding and strict in my work.	-2	-1	Sometimes I neglect my duties
39. When I am very upset, my heart is heavy.	-2	-1	I very rarely have a gloomy mood
40. Music can so capture me that I lose track of time.	-2	-1	Dramatic art and ballet seem boring to me
41. I like to be in big and cheerful companies.	-2	-1	I prefer privacy
42. Most people are honest and can be trusted.	-2	-1	Sometimes I'm suspicious of other people
43. I usually work conscientiously.	-2	-1	People often find mistakes in my work
44. I get depressed easily.	-2	-1	I can't spoil the mood
45. A real work of art makes me admire	-2	-1	I rarely admire the perfection of a real work of art.
46. “Sick” at sports competitions, I forget about everything	-2	-1	I don't understand why people play dangerous sports
47. I try to be sensitive when dealing with people.	-2	-1	Sometimes I don't care about other people's interests
48. I rarely do what I want to do thoughtlessly.	-2	-1	I prefer to make decisions quickly
49. I have many weaknesses and shortcomings	-2	-1	I have high self esteem
50. I am well aware of my state of mind	-2	-1	I feel like other people are less sensitive than me.
51. I often ignore warning signs	-2	-1	I prefer to avoid dangerous situations
52. I share the joy of others as my own.	-2	-1	I don't always share other people's feelings
53. I usually control my feelings and desires.	-2	-1	I find it hard to contain my desires
54. If I fail, I usually blame myself.	-2	-1	I am often "lucky" and circumstances are rarely against me
55. I believe that feelings make my life meaningful.	-2	-1	I rarely pay attention to other people's experiences
56. I like carnival processions and demonstrations.	-2	-1	I don't like being in crowded places
57. I try to put myself in the place of another person in order to understand him.	-2	-1	I do not seek to understand all the nuances of other people's experiences.
58. In the store, I usually choose for a long time what I decided to buy.	-2	-1	Sometimes I buy things on impulse.
59. Sometimes I feel like a pathetic person.	-2	-1	Usually I feel like the right person
60. I easily "get used" to the experiences of a fictional character	-2	-1	Movie hero adventures can't change my state of mind
61. I feel happy when people pay attention to me.	-2	-1	I am a modest person and try not to stand out among people
62. In every person there is something for which he can be respected	-2	-1	I haven't met a man yet to respect
63. I usually think well before I act.	-2	-1	I do not like to think in advance the results of my actions.
64. I often have ups and downs in my mood.	-2	-1	I usually have an even mood
65. Sometimes I feel like a magician playing tricks on people.	-2	-1	People often call me a boring but reliable person.
66. I am attractive to people of the opposite yol	-2	-1	Some consider me an ordinary and uninteresting person
67. I always try to be kind and considerate to every person.	-2	-1	Some people think that I'm presumptuous and selfish
68. Before traveling, I make a precise plan.	-2	-1	I can't understand why people make such detailed plans.
69. My mood is easily reversed	-2	-1	I am always calm and balanced
70. I think life is a gamble	-2	-1	Life is an experience passed on to future generations
71. I like to look provocative	-2	-1	1;	In society, I usually do not stand out with my behavior and fashionable clothes.
72. Some say that I am condescending to others.	-2	-1	They say that I often brag about my successes.
73. I do my job accurately and methodically.	-2	-1	I prefer to go with the flow, trusting my intuition.
74. Sometimes I get so excited that I even cry	-2	-1	It's hard to piss me off
75. Sometimes I feel that I can discover something new in myself.	-2	-1	I would not like to change anything in myself

The five-factor personality questionnaire or Big five test was developed by American psychologists R. McCrae and P. Costa in 1983-1985. Later, the methodology was refined and in its final form it was presented by the NEO-personality questionnaire or NEO-PI-R (from the English. Neuroticism, extraversion, openness - a personality questionnaire). The authors of the questionnaire, R. McCrae and P. Costa, are convinced that the identified five independent variables, more precisely, personality factors of temperament and character (neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, cooperation, conscientiousness) are sufficient for an objective description of a psychological portrait - a model of personality.

In this way, big five model(Big five) - dispositional (from the English disposition - predisposition) model of a person's personality (see Fig. 1 Big Five Model)

A five-factor test questionnaire consists of 75 paired, opposite in meaning, stimulus statements that characterize human behavior. The stimulus material has a five-point rating scale (-2; -1; 0; 1; 2) for diagnosing the severity of each of the five factors:

1. extraversion - introversion;

2. attachment - isolation;

3. self-control - impulsiveness;

4. emotional instability - emotional stability;

5. expressiveness - practicality.

At present, the Big Five test questionnaire has become popular and has acquired great practical importance both abroad and in Russia. The 5PFQ technique was adapted by A. B. Khromov in 1999.

Big five test. Five-factor personality questionnaire (R. McCrae, P. Costa). Method for diagnosing personality factors of temperament and character (5PFQ):

Key to the test, handling the results of the Big Five Test. (Five-factor personality questionnaire (R. McCrae, P. Costa). Method for diagnosing personal factors of temperament and character (5PFQ))

1. The selected evaluation values of statements are converted into points:

Accompanying material for elective courses in the version without the use of ICT

PROFESSIONALLY SIGNIFICANT QUALITIES.

In psychology, it is customary to study and take into account the different qualities of a person - such characteristics of the human psyche that are formed and manifested in communication. From the first days of our lives, we are included in the interaction with the people around us. And the experience that we accumulate in communication gradually becomes a part of ourselves, forming an “alloy” with those qualities that we have inherited. It cannot be clearly said that some of our psychological qualities are innate, and some others are acquired in communication. Any of them is an inseparable unity of one and the other, the result of the influence of both heredity and upbringing. But some qualities are still more dependent on the upbringing and life experience of a person, while others are for the most part determined by heredity (for example, abilities or temperament).

What are “personal qualities” and how many are there in total? In the spoken language, there are about four and a half thousand words used by people to characterize personal qualities.

Big Five (psychology)

If we generalize synonyms and exclude very rarely used words, then the number of corresponding concepts will be approximately 200. Approximately so many qualities are actually used by people to characterize each other's personality.

Meanwhile, in modern psychology, there are five main personality characteristics, the existence of which is revealed on the basis of summarizing the results of many studies. This is the so-called "big five" personality traits. The following method allows you to determine the degree of their severity.

"Big Five" personality traits.

The technique was developed by A.G. Gretsov.

Instructions: evaluate the applicability to yourself of each of the following statements. Write your answers with one of three numbers:

0 - no, it's not about me;

1 - sometimes it's about me, sometimes not;

2 - Yes, it's definitely about me.

Please answer sincerely - there are no "right" and "wrong" answers here, each of them testifies to your individual originality. Answer quickly, without thinking too long about questions; Give the option that comes to mind first. Write down the answers in the form below (if you do not want to make notes directly in the book, draw it on a blank sheet of paper).

Questionnaire text:

1. For me, the best vacation is to chat in a fun company.

2. I sometimes feel very cheerful or sad even without a serious reason.

3. I am very interested in everything new that appears around.

4. I always carry out what I have planned.

5. When I am in a quarrel with someone, I usually take the first step myself to make amends.

6. I often need friends who could support and console me.

7. My mood changes easily.

8. It seems to me that the proverb “everything new is a well-forgotten old” is incorrect.

9. I know how to calculate my time so that I have time to do everything I need.

10. I can be called a soft-hearted person.

11. I really like to visit.

12. Sometimes I worry so much that I can't sit still.

13. I can be called a very curious person.

14. I think that others consider me a very responsible person.

15. I am a trusting person.

16. I am often drawn to adventure, I like to shake things up.

17. Monotony gets boring very quickly.

18. I have a wide range of interests, various hobbies.

19. I am careful and prudent in words and deeds.

20. I willingly respond to a wide variety of requests from friends and acquaintances.

21. I get most of my knowledge from communication, not from school lessons.

22. Sometimes I feel very tired for no reason.

23. I easily find my way in unexpected situations.

24. If my desires conflict with needs, then I choose not what I want, but what I must do.

25. I think that others do not consider me an egoist.

26. I am a talkative person.

27. I think that the characteristic “calm” is definitely not about me.

28. I think that most people around me think that I am a creative person with a rich imagination.

29. I believe that you can’t call me lazy.

I prefer to cooperate with others rather than compete with them.

31. I like big noisy companies.

32. I am often overcome by doubts on a variety of occasions.

33. I like to reflect on the causes and consequences of the events taking place in my life.

34. When I set a goal for myself, I am ready to overcome great difficulties on the way to it.

35. I think that I am a generous person.

36. I'm better at working in the company of other people, and not alone.

37. I am easily amused or upset.

38. I like to learn everything new - even when it goes against my knowledge and beliefs.

39. Before doing anything, I always think about the possible consequences.

40. I enjoy helping other people.

Answer sheet

In the top row, Roman numerals indicate the column numbers. Below, Arabic numerals indicate the numbers of questions, write down the answers to them in the corresponding cells.

I	II	Ill	IV	V
1.	2.	3.	4.	5.
6.	7.	8.	9.	10.
11.	12.	13.	14.	15.
16.	17.	18.	19.	20.
21.	22.	23.	24.	25.
26.	27.	28.	29.	30.
31.	32.	33.	34.	35.
36.	37.	38.	39.	40.

PLAN

Big Five Model (P.Costa, R.McCrae)

Alternative Big Five

One-factor personality model (Big One, General Factor Model)

personality and situation. R.B. Cattell Specification Equation

Personality trait as sensitivity to situations

Big Five Model

Another attempt to create a factor theory of personality was created in the late 80s. within the framework of the so-called. "lexical model", continuing the research of G. Allport, R.B. Cattell, L. Thurstone; The authors are American psychologists Paul Costa and Robert McCrae. The main idea of this approach is that all significant psychological and behavioral differences are necessarily fixed in the language, which means that it is enough to study everyday and literary expressions related to the human appearance in order to be sure of reflecting the system-forming core of the personality. The limitation of the approach is that it is difficult to determine the relationship between different characteristics without introducing "vertical" and "horizontal" dimensions that set the basis for the hierarchy within the personality system. The model is based on those variables that are most commonly represented in the language; “linguistic personality” is represented as consisting of 5 most stable determinable factors, each of them includes six factors of the second order ( facets). Facets are also personality traits, but less generalized.

The five-factor model is often used to clarify the nature of other psychological phenomena and determine their place in the intrapersonal space - if correlations with facets are high, then it can claim the status of a second-order trait; if correlations with first-order traits are high, this is usually taken as a sign that the phenomenon in question is redundant and can be reduced to the features of a five-factor model.

The postulates of the five-factor theory of personality are as follows.

Five-factor personality questionnaire McCrae - Costa ("Big Five")

All adults can be characterized by a specific combination of personality traits that influence thoughts, feelings, and behavior ( about individuality).

2. The personality traits studied are endogenous basic tendencies. (about the origin).

3. Traits develop in childhood, are finally formed in adulthood and remain unchanged in adapted subjects ( about the development).

4. Traits are organized hierarchically, from narrow and specific to broad, more general dispositions ( about structure).

Listed below are five highlighted features with facets (features of the second order).

E Extraversion
Warmth	Heat
Gregariousness	Sociability
assertiveness	Self confidence
Activity	Activity
Excitement seeking	Looking for arousal
positive emotions	Positive emotions
N Neroticism Neuroticism
Anxiety	Anxiety
Angry hostility	Hostility
depression	Depression
Self-consciousness	Shyness
impulsiveness	Impulsiveness
Vulnerability	Vulnerability
About Openness to Experience
Fantasy	Imagination
Aesthetics	Aesthetics
Feelings	The senses
Actions	Actions
ideas	Ideas
values	Values
A Agreeableness
Trust	Confidence
straightforwardness	Directness
Altruism	Altruism
Compliance	Compliance
modesty	Modesty
Tender-mindedness	Generosity
C Conscientiousness Conscientiousness
competence	Competence
order	orderliness
Dutyfulness	diligence
Achievement striving	Striving for achievement (commitment)
self-discipline	self-discipline
Deliberation	mindfulness

The poles of the main features of the Big Five.

Extraversion (involvement) - sociability, assertiveness or calmness, passivity
Goodwill (pleasantness) - kindness, gullibility, warmth or hostility, selfishness, distrust
Conscientiousness (reliability) - organization, thoroughness, reliability or carelessness, negligence, unreliability
Neuroticism - nervousness, dejection, irritability - emotional stability - relaxation, poise, stability
Openness to experience, culture - spontaneity, creativity or narrow-mindedness, mediocrity, narrowness of interests.

To date, the five-factor model, or the Big Five Model (FFM, five factor model), has received its confirmation thanks to psychometric studies; it is the most widely developed, because the identified factors have high convergent validity, manifesting themselves in various approaches.

Criticism of the Five Factor Model: weak predictive power, lack of explanations for human behavior and other phenomena.

Alternative Big Five

Proposed by G. Eysenck's student Marvin Zuckerman. The main idea of the model is to be able to compare the individuality of all biological species, and not just measure people. Zuckerman disagrees that Openness to experience is an essential personality trait, in his view. This trait should be replaced by Impulsive Impression Seeking as a more legitimate phenomenon.

Features of the Alternative Big Five.

Neuroticism-anxiety: measures anxiety, fear, psychasthenia, general emotionality, suppression of aggression. The trait is associated with obsessive indecisiveness, lack of self-confidence, sensitivity to criticism.

Aggression-hostility opposes social desirability, measures aggression, hostility, anger, poor control over desire suppression, low social desirability. Associated with rudeness, thoughtlessness, antisocial behavior, vindictiveness, violent temperament and intolerance.

Impulsive sensation-seeking: Measures low socialization, high psychoticism, impulsiveness, tendency to act rashly, lack of planning, desire for extreme experiences, novelty, volatility, unpredictable situations, and friends.

Sociability: Measures cooperativeness, social attachments, extraversion, love of holidays and parties, interacting with a large number of people, as well as dislike of social isolation.

Activity: measures tenacity, the energy of behavior, is related to the need to remain highly active and the feeling of restlessness when there is nothing to do.

Many researchers are trying to further reduce the number of features in the model. There were attempts to single out a two-factor model (The Big Two) - the main personality traits turned out to be Stability and Plasticity. Many argue that one factor is enough to study the individual characteristics of a person (The Big One, General Factor of Personality (GFP)) studies (J. Philippe Rushton, Paul Irwing, Janek Musek) show that indeed the General Factor of Personality forms the pinnacle of multifactorial theories. The general factor is characterized by a high degree of Emotional stability (the opposite pole of Neuroticism), friendliness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Openness to experience. It is also associated with social desirability, emotionality, motivation, well-being, life satisfaction, and high self-esteem. The opposite pole is often called Oddity (strangeness), it marks the risks of psychological distress. The main personality factor is interpreted as a basic personality disposition that has deep biological - evolutionary, genetic, neurophysiological roots.

Research also often examines isolated personality traits, often related to pathological risks. An example is the composition of three traits unfavorable for personality development - the so-called. The Dark Triad - Machiavellianism, psychotism, narcissism. These traits are associated with the will to power and achievement and provoke all sorts of antisocial behavior. Schizotypal is also distinguished as a separate feature - if it is strongly expressed, they speak of a schizotypal personality (Schizotypal Personality), which, however, develops within the normal range. Schizotypy as a subfeature has features such as Odd beliefs or Magical thinking, Unusual perceptual experiences, Ideas of reference, Excessive social anxiety, paranoid (Paranoid ideation/suspiciousness), Constricted affect, Odd speech, Odd or eccentric behavior.

It is necessary to note the high internal (substantive and methodological) similarity of the discussed models with the special theory of individuality developed in Russian psychological science. At the same time, it is important to realize that trait theories are "intermediate" between typological and idiographic (clinical) approaches to the study of personality.

However, any theory has its limitations, which set the limits of its heuristic possibilities. Therefore, having defined a trait as a situationally stable manifestation, this statement should also be questioned.

Scales	Russian variable name	Variable content	What measures

N	neuroticism	Tendency to experience negative emotions (such as anxiety, fear, sadness, depression, irritation, hostility, and others)	Reflects the ability to adapt, emotional stability / instability
N1	Anxiety
N2	Vicious Hostility
N3	Depression
N4	Shyness
N5	Impulsiveness
N6	Vulnerability

E	extraversion	Sociability, disposition to communicate, love for all kinds of gatherings and gatherings, initiative, activity, optimism	Measures the quantitative side and intensity of interpersonal interaction and communication
E1	cordiality
E2	herding
E3	assertiveness (perseverance)
E4	Activity
E5	Looking for arousal
E6	Positive emotions

O	Openness to experience	The desire to search and master new experiences - ideas, knowledge, impressions	Identifies people with flexibility of mind, active imagination, aesthetic sense, independent in their judgments, attentive to the feelings of others, accepting and defending new ideas and non-traditional values.
O1	Imagination
O2	Aesthetics
O3	The senses
O4	Actions
O5	Ideas
O6	Values

A	accommodating	Altruism, trust and sympathy for people, desire to help, willingness to ask for help and belief that others will help; opposite qualities: rivalry, self-centeredness, skepticism towards people	Reflects polar interpersonal tendencies from pity and compassion to antagonism
A1	Confidence
A2	Directness
A3	Altruism
A4	complaisance
A5	Modesty
A6	Softness

C	Consciousness	Purposefulness, sense of duty, scrupulousness, punctuality, consistency and reliability	Measures the degree of perseverance, organization and consistency in achieving goals
C1	Competence
C2	organization
C3	Call of Duty
C4	Striving for Achievement
C5	self-discipline
C6	prudence

Adaptation and standardization of the questionnaire in the internal affairs bodies was carried out at the Department of Psychology, Pedagogy and Organization of Work with Personnel of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia on a sample of 1250 people (1188 men and 62 women, average age 34 years), consisting of persons of middle and senior commanding staff bodies of internal affairs entering the study.

The results according to the method can be presented both in T-scores and in stalines based on those given in Table. 3.10 descriptive statistics data.

Table 3.10

Guideline values NEO-FFI

Methodology for the study of the characteristics of thinking (MIOM). The methodology for studying the characteristics of thinking (MIOM, adapted by D.I. Shpachenko, 1984), used to assess the verbal intelligence and analytical and predictive abilities of managers, is an adapted version of R. Amthauer's intelligence structure test (Amthauer Intelligenz-Strukture-Test, I-S-T, 1953). MIOM is designed to measure the level of intellectual development of persons aged 13 to 61 years.

The test consists of nine subtests (Appendix 4), each of which is aimed at measuring different functions of intelligence. In total, the subjects are offered 176 tasks. The test was developed, first of all, as a method for diagnosing the level of general abilities in connection with the problems of professional psychodiagnostics, developing recommendations for choosing a profession, and analyzing professional suitability.

1. Logical selection and general awareness – the study of inductive thinking, a sense of language. The subject's task is to complete the sentence with one of the given words. The number of tasks is 20. The execution time is 6 minutes.

2. Definition of common features – study of the ability to abstract, operate with verbal concepts. The tasks offer five words, four of which are united by a certain semantic connection, and one is superfluous. This word must be highlighted in the answer. The number of tasks is 20. The execution time is 6 minutes.

3. Analogies – analysis of combinatorial abilities. Three words are offered in the tasks, there is a certain connection between the first and the second. After the third word, a dash. Of the five options offered for the task, it is necessary to choose a word that would be associated with the third in the same way as the first two. Number of tasks - 11. Execution time - 7 minutes.

4. Classification – assessment of the ability to make judgments and make generalizations. It is necessary to designate two words as the most general concept. The number of tasks is 16. The execution time is 8 minutes. The response score varies from 0 to 2 points depending on the level of generalization.

5. Tasks for the account – assessment of the level of development of practical mathematical thinking. Number of tasks - 20. Solution time - 10 minutes.

6. Number series - analysis of inductive thinking, the ability to operate with numbers. In 20 tasks, it is necessary to establish the pattern of the number series and continue it. Run time - 10 minutes.

7. Choice of figures – study of spatial thinking, combinatorial abilities. In the tasks, geometric shapes are divided into parts. When choosing an answer, you should find a figure that corresponds to a figure divided into parts. The number of tasks is 20. The execution time is 7 minutes.

8. Problems with cubes – is also examined as in the 7th subtest. In each of the 20 tasks, a cube is given in a certain position, changed in relation to a number of cubes, indicated by letters. It is necessary to identify a cube with one of their designated letters. The solution time is 10 minutes.

9. Tasks for the ability to concentrate attention and working memory - it is proposed to memorize a table of 25 words in 3 minutes. Then, according to the named initial letter, it is necessary to remember to which class the word starting with this letter belongs. Run time - 6 minutes.

When calculating "raw" marks (except for the 4th subtest), each correct solution is estimated at 1 point. Then the primary scores for each subtest are converted into scale scores. Thus, the structure of intelligence can be characterized by the profile of success in solving individual groups of tasks. The sum of primary scores for all subtests is translated into an integral assessment of intelligence.

When creating the test, R. Amthauer proceeded from the concept that considers the intellect as a specialized substructure in the integral structure of the personality. This construct is understood by him as a structured integrity of mental abilities, manifested in various forms of activity.

The test makes it possible to distinguish in the integral structure of the intellect the characteristics of abilities manifested in various forms of activity. These are speech, counting and mathematical (analytical and prognostic) abilities, spatial thinking and others.

When selecting test tasks, R. Amthauer was guided by two main principles: 1) ensuring the highest possible correlation of each subtest with the overall result; 2) achieving the lowest possible correlation between individual groups of tasks.

This gives grounds for the selective use of variants of this test. The set of subtests used in the professional psychological selection of candidates for training at the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia included, first of all, tasks aimed at assessing the ability for logical thinking as the most informative about the intellectual level of development of the personality of the future leader (subtests Nos. 2,3 and 6 ).

MIOM is used by the centers of psychodiagnostics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, units of psychological support of educational institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Methodology for the analysis of typical management situations (MATUS) designed to assess the severity of managerial thinking (Appendix 5). Implements a subject-activity approach in the psychodiagnostics of professionally important qualities of the head of the Department of Internal Affairs. The methodology simulates the working environment that develops around the head of a particular internal affairs body by sequentially presenting him with various situations encountered in the practice of managing the internal affairs department. The subject, performing a thought experiment, identifies himself with the subject of the action (leader), carries out the development and adoption of a managerial decision corresponding to the situation presented for resolution. At the same time, the study of thinking directly in the simulated activity is based on the reconstruction of the procedural aspects of thinking through the objectification of its subject-content aspects.

An important place in diagnosing activity situations is occupied by the additional motivation of the subjects, which, delving into their usual work environment, intensively reflecting, solve typical operational tasks. At the same time, the stimulus material and the closed list of possible MATUS responses, as elements of the diagnostic system, are an organic unity and are developed taking into account the following specific requirements:

The methodology should determine the qualitative and quantitative characteristics (degree of severity) of the subject's managerial thinking with the appropriate psychometric indicators of the test;

The influence on the result of the study of other individually psychological characteristics (professional knowledge, experience, memory, interests, worldview, culture, and others), except for the diagnosed PVC, should be minimal;

Business situations in the aggregate should reflect the actual processes that are similar to those that arise or, under certain circumstances, may arise in the activities of the Department of Internal Affairs;

In practical situations, various types of leader activity should be presented.

MATUS (full version) contains 10 business situations, each of which has four possible solutions.

The system of objective indicators characterizing managerial thinking was the success (correctness) of solving problems and the time spent (taken into account optionally). The test results are presented on a scale of walls (10 points), which corresponded to the maximum number of correctly solved problems of the methodology.

Basic psychometric characteristics MATUS. The correlation between the results of the two surveys (retest reliability) is 0.92. The high indicator of MATUS retest reliability can be explained by the peculiarity of human memory for better memorization of semantic (activity-oriented) information, since the test subject, according to the testing conditions, was forced to “permeate” the proposed practical situations in order to successfully find their solution.

Comparison of the number of correctly solved MATUS tasks (Ks scale) with the results of subtests 2, 3 and 6 of the methodology for studying the characteristics of thinking, as well as the Ie, Mp, Ct scales of the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) indicates the existence of certain correlations with diagnostic indicators, evaluating individual parameters of the individual's intellectual efficiency (Table 3.11).

Portal for the student. Self-training

Theoretical basis

Adaptations and modifications

Procedure

Instruction

Results processing

Regulatory data

Interpretation of results

Literature

STRUCTURE OF THE METHOD

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

HISTORY OF CREATION

PSYCHOMETRIC PARAMETERS

REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES

PUBLICATIONS

EDUCATION

Five-factor personality questionnaire

Five-factor personality questionnaire McCrae and Costa (Big Five)

Five-factor personality questionnaire 5PFQ

Accompanying material for elective courses in the version without the use of ICT

Big Five (psychology)

Five-factor personality questionnaire McCrae - Costa ("Big Five")

RELATED ARTICLES