Poem by N.A. Nekrasov "Elegy"
When you pick up an unfamiliar literary work, the first thing you pay attention to is the title. What is "Elegy"? Why did Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov name his creation that way?
In the "Dictionary of Literary Terms" you can read the following: "Elegy is a genre form of lyrics. The themes of the elegy are diverse: patriotism, the ideals of civil and military prowess, the joy and sorrow of love. In the new European literature, the elegy loses its clarity of form, but acquires a certainty of content, becoming an expression of predominantly philosophical reflections, sad reflections, sorrow.
It was the latter that found a vivid reflection in Nekrasov's "Elegy" (1874). The theme of mournful reflections on the suffering of the people, the theme of the widespread oppression of serfs is the most important direction in Nekrasov's work.
Let the changing fashion tell us
That the theme is old - "the suffering of the people"
And that poetry should forget it, -
Don't believe me guys! she doesn't age.
The poem was written thirteen years after the reforms of 1861. The people are "liberated", they "have land", they are "happy". What kind of “suffering of the people” can we talk about?! These are relics of the past. But such a statement is fundamentally wrong. And Nekrasov understands this, he “reminds that the people are in poverty”, he is aware of the significance of the problem. Our attention is drawn to the obsolete form of stress in the word "getting old", which was characteristic of Russian literature of the 19th century (remember, for example, Chatsky's statement: "What is older is worse"). When reading, willy-nilly, you pay attention to the word itself, and to the whole sentence, which expresses one of the main thoughts of the entire poem.
Alas! while the nations
Dragging in poverty, submitting to scourges,
Like lean herds across mowed meadows...
Reading these lines, you involuntarily recall the “Village” by A.S. Pushkin: “Leaning on an alien plow, submitting to whips, // Here, skinny slavery drags along the reins.”
By this similarity, Nekrasov, as it were, agrees with the thesis “that the topic is old -“ the suffering of the people ””, but at the same time he shows that after fifty-five years no significant changes have occurred in society, and emphasizes that the topic has not lost its relevance.
The comparison of the people with the herds is noteworthy. What is a herd? How to explain this concept in relation to people? This is a large mass of people who are not able to think, they obey only the "shepherds". The role of the "shepherd" could be claimed by the noble intelligentsia, but, like the people, they do not really think about this and about life in general, they live according to the rules established by them, and cannot (or do not want to), due to their weakness, accept any those are drastic decisions. Hence the comparison with the crowd.
But back to the people. Without a shepherd, a herd is an “amoeba-like” mass of people incapable of making independent decisions, obeying the influence of some external factors that do not depend on it, but ready to “get along” with them. The same definition applies to serfs, whose rights are universally infringed, turning them into slaves. But the serfs believe that this is how it should be, they don’t even think about freedom, believing that nothing needs to be changed - that’s how it is, therefore, that’s how it should be. Why think when the “kind” gentleman Krainev K. has already decided everything for you. A poem by N.A. Nekrasov "Elegy": Perception, interpretation, evaluation. // Literature. - No. 17. - 2008..
Reflecting on this topic, you recall Pushkin's poem "Freedom sower of the desert ...":
Graze, peaceful peoples!
The cry of honor will not wake you up.
Why do the herds need the gifts of freedom?
They must be cut or sheared.
You can dedicate your lyre, your thoughts, aspirations, life to the people... but it will remain deaf, like a herd...
"Elegy" is addressed to some young men, but who are these young men? Let's remember Nekrasov's "Railway", little Vanya, who learned the bitter truth about the construction of the first Nikolaev railway in Russia. Then, in 1864, the lyrical hero of Nekrasov tried to convey the truth to the boy, who still had his whole life ahead of him, in the hope that he, a representative of the new generation, would alleviate the fate of the serfs and save the people from suffering. Ten years later, in 1874, the lyrical hero of Nekrasov again tries to do the same. In essence, the “young men” represent the same Vanya, who has only matured ten years, and his peers. But why are the same thoughts addressed to “the same person”? After all, so much time has passed, the people are “free”, why repeat yourself, this is no longer in vogue? Nekrasov is trying to "reach out" to the younger generation:
Enough to rejoice in a naive passion, -
Muse whispered to me: - It's time to go forward:
The people have been liberated, but are the people happy?
The lyrical hero of Nekrasov is stubbornly looking for an answer to the question:
"Freedom has finally made a difference
In people's destinies? into the tunes of rural maidens?
Or is their discordant melody just as sorrowful? .. "
He wanders through the fields, absorbed in thoughts of people's happiness. He, like Gogol in "Dead Souls", asks the question: "Where is Rus' rushing now?" But she does not give an answer. The same can be attributed to Nekrasov's "subject of chanting":
“And my song is loud!.. The valleys, fields echo it,
And the echo of distant mountains sends her feedback,
And the forest responded ... Nature listens to me ... "
Here Nekrasov does not accidentally use metaphor and personification. The poet, as it were, revives nature: valleys, fields understand the song of the lyrical hero; the "echo of distant mountains" even responds to her, apparently trying to enter into a "discussion" of the song; the forest generally responded ... nature listens to the lyrical hero ... Everything is wonderful: if nature “responded”, then people should understand the hero even more, but the following lines are unexpected for the lyrical hero, author, reader:
But the one about whom I sing in the evening silence
To whom the poet's dreams are dedicated, -
Alas! he does not heed - and does not give an answer ...
In this vivid contrast, Nekrasov shows how difficult it is to help the people when the one to whom "the poet's dreams are dedicated" remains passive and inert in relation to the "people's defenders." Alas, this is how it historically happened in Rus' ...
At the end of his life, Pushkin wrote the poem "I erected a monument to myself not made by hands ...". In this work, he summed up his creative activity, he assessed himself as a poet, realized his mission:
And for a long time I will be kind to the people,
That I aroused good feelings with lyre,
That in my cruel age I glorified freedom
And he called for mercy on the fallen.
"Elegy" Nekrasov also wrote at the end of his life and also summed up his work, also assessed himself as a poet:
I dedicated the lyre to my people.
Perhaps I will die unknown to him,
But I served him - and my heart is calm ...
I especially want to say about the composition of the poem. The beginning of the Elegy is very polemical. This is Nekrasov's answer to the statement of the literary critic O.F. Miller, who believed that "the direct description of the suffering of the people and the poor in general" was already "exhausted" by the poet and that he "began to somehow repeat himself when he took up this topic." The rest of the poem is tied around this answer and partially complements the original judgments addressed to O.F. Miller.
So, "Elegy" is a kind of mirror of Nekrasov's work. Everything is here: the theme of the plight of the people, and the theme of serving the people, and the poet's view of modern reality ... not without reason in the lines of his letter to A.N. The poet writes to Yerakov: “I am sending you poems. Since these are my most sincere and beloved of those written by me lately, I dedicate them to you, my dearest friend ... "
"Elegy" is a wonderful example of Nekrasov's civic lyrics. The main idea of this poem is to prove that the people suffered and still suffer, despite the reforms. It is also very important for Nekrasov to convey his thoughts about the need for some kind of change in the situation of the people to the youth, for whom the poet has all hope.
people homeland poetry Nekrasov
The poem "Elegy" by N.A. Nekrasov wrote in 1874 in response to criticism from literary historians. They considered the poet's work monotonous and repetitive, because the main theme of Nekrasov is the image of the life of the Russian people. But at that time there was no longer serfdom, which means that many believed that the peasants began to live happily, and that this problem was not relevant.
The poem refers to the theme of the people, like most of Nekrasov's works. But here the poet turns first of all to unknown opponents, arguing that the problem of the happiness of ordinary people is still relevant today.
While the nations
Dragging in poverty, submitting to scourges,
Like lean herds across mowed meadows
Nekrasov considers it important "to arouse the attention of the mighty of the world to the people," because the peasants, having received freedom, are still in poverty. And the poet fully understands them, because he himself had to live in complete poverty on the street.
“I dedicated the lyre to my people,” he is calm because the heroes of his works are peasants, not noble people. He was lucky to see a red day when serfdom was abolished, but at that moment the Muse spoke, and the question arose: "The people are liberated, but are the people happy?" In search of an answer, the poet turns to the daily life of peasants working in the field and completely surrendering to their work.
Excited, he does not find an answer to the "secret questions" about whether changes have come to the people's destinies, "to the tunes of rural maidens", or not.
Concluding the "Elegy", Nekrasov notes that he does not know whether the life of the Russian peasants has become better or worse. He only asks for blessings on rural labors, promises curses to the people's enemy and prays to the heavens for the power of a friend.
Nature listens to me
But the one about whom I sing in the evening silence
He does not heed - and does not give an answer ...
Nekrasov wanted to express his feeling of love and duty to the people, understanding of the problems of ordinary people. He drew attention to the problem of happiness and showed that the abolition of serfdom does not mean at all that the people have become free and happy.
The poet uses lexical and syntactic means of expression: epithets (“sweet tears”, “red day”), metaphor (“The muse will serve them”), personification (“And the forest responded ...”, “nature listens to me), anaphora (“And the echo of the distant mountains sends her feedback, And the forest responded ... "), a rhetorical question ("What could the lyre serve more worthily?"), As well as such a type of sound writing as alliteration ("That the theme is old -" the suffering of the people "," And I shed sweet tears in tenderness ...") All these stylistic figures convey the mood of the poet, his exciting thought. The poem is written in two-syllable size - iambic, paired rhyming is used, it gives the text clarity, and at the same time expressiveness.
The elegy impresses with its mood, simple and at the same time good rhyming, expressiveness. The poet acts as a passionate defender of people's interests, and even nature listens to him.
"Only one thing is important - to love the people, the Motherland, to serve them with heart and soul"
Effective preparation for the exam (all subjects) - start preparing
Updated: 2017-09-25
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
The writing
N. A. Nekrasov is a famous Russian poet of the 19th century, editor of the Sovremennik and Domestic Notes magazines. Despite the fact that the poet grew up in a wealthy family, he was worried about the fate of the common people. The heroes of his poems and poems are simple peasants, townspeople, the poor, the destitute. This was the innovation of Nekrasov as a poet. After all, neither in Pushkin, nor in Lermontov, nor in Gogol, we will see ordinary people as the main characters of the works. Nikolai Alekseevich not only created vivid images of peasants and townspeople in his poems, but also worried about the fate of the poorest sections of society. The poet speaks about this in the poem "Elegy", written in 1874, 13 years after the abolition of serfdom.
Elegy is a special genre that many romantic poets turned to: Zhukovsky, Baratynsky, Batyushkov. The elegy, translated from the ancient Greek “complaint”, conveyed sad experiences, mainly about unhappy love. Nekrasov changed the genre, giving his elegy a social connotation. This is a sad poem-meditation about the fate of the people after the reform of 1861 and the establishment of high ideals of life. The elegy is written in iambic six-foot with missing accents (a traditional line for elegies).
The first part begins by addressing the younger generation of readers:
That the theme is old - "the suffering of the people",
And that poetry should forget it, -
Don't believe me guys! She doesn't age.
The poet is trying to start a conversation by defining the theme of his work in general and this work in particular - "the suffering of the people." This is what interests him the most. He seeks to convince the reader that he is right, using vivid comparisons and epithets:
"Alas! While the nations
Dragging in poverty, obeying the gods,
Like lean herds across mowed meadows.
The antithesis heightens the urgency of the question:
To remind the crowd that the people are in poverty,
While she rejoices and sings...
The poet uses exclamatory sentences, rhetorical questions, omissions in the elegy, which brings the style closer to journalistic. Exclamation:
Mourn their fate, the muse will serve them,
And in the world there is no stronger, more beautiful union!
echoes the rhetorical question asked at the end:
To excite the attention of the mighty of the world to the people -
What better service could the lyre serve? …
For Nekrasov, the muse, creativity are obliged to serve the people, a real poet, a citizen, cannot but worry about his fate:
I dedicated the lyre to my people...
This line is the leitmotif of all Nekrasov's work.
In the second part, which begins with these words, the poet reflects on the reform of 1861. For him, this decree is a great joy. But in these lines, the author's irony is also felt:
I saw a red day: There is no slave in Russia!
And I shed sweet tears in tenderness ...
Enough to rejoice in naive passion, -
Muse whispered to me ...
And again, the poet-publicist asks a question related to the theme of the poem: The people are freed, but are the people happy? We will find the answer to it later.
The elegy traditionally has a descriptive part. In the third and fourth parts, Nekrasov draws a picture of life after the reformed village with the help of vivid epithets and metaphors, he watches the peasants, admires their work:
Do I listen to the songs of the reapers over the harvest of gold;
Does the old man slowly walk behind the plow,
Does it run through the meadow, playing and whistling,
Do the sickles sparkle, do the scythes ring together ...
And again at the end of the stanza, like a shot - rhetorical questions:
Have you become more tolerable, peasant suffering?
And the long slavery that came to replace
Freedom finally made a difference
In people's destinies? into the tunes of rural maidens?
Or is their discordant melody also woeful?
Evening is coming. Driven by dreams
Through the fields, through the meadows lined with haystacks,
Thoughtfully wandering in the cool twilight ...
... She is echoed by valleys, fields,
And the echo of distant mountains sends her feedback
And the forest responded...
But what about the people? The one about whose fate the poet is so worried? We find the answer to this question at the end of the poem:
Alas! he does not heed - and does not give an answer ...
It is no coincidence that the author uses silence not only after rhetorical questions and exclamations, but also at the end of the poem: The people do not hear the poet's questions, they do not want a better life for themselves. Nekrasov is indignant at the patience of the peasantry. People are so accustomed to being dependent on the landlords that they continue to carry out labor service out of habit, they see no other fate for themselves. The liberation from serfdom did not bring the expected changes in peasant life. This is the idea of Nekrasov's "Elegy". And the answers to the questions posed should be given by the readers, the younger generation to whom the poet addresses.
N. A. Nekrasov is one of those Russian poets who, with all their work, seemed to be arguing with the previous literary tradition and at the same time they themselves created a new tradition, characterizing the time in which they worked. N. A. Nekrasov completely rethinks the idea of poetry, the role of the poet in the life of society. But in order to argue with tradition, it was necessary to establish a connection with it. That is why a number of poems by N. A. Nekrasov are clearly polemical in nature. This is how one of the best, in my opinion, poems of the poet - "Elegy" becomes.
The poem "Elegy" was written in 1874 and became the answer of N. A. Nekrasov to the statements addressed to the poet by many critics.
One of them wrote: “What was his (Nekrasov’s) favorite topic - a direct description of the suffering of the people and the poor in general - has already been exhausted by him, not because such a topic in itself could ever be completely exhausted, but because our poet began to somehow repeat himself when he takes up this topic. Another critic suggested that after 1861 the theme itself seems outdated and untenable. It is the controversy with such statements that, in my opinion, can explain the beginning of the poem:
Let the changing fashion tell us
That the theme is old - "the suffering of the people"
And that poetry should forget it, -
Don't believe me guys! she doesn't age.
For his poem, N. A. Nekrasov chooses a six-foot iambic with a pair of rhymes, that is, an Alexandrian verse is the solemn size of the era of classicism.
This immediately establishes an orientation to a high level of verse and, in addition, a connection with Pushkin's "Village". There are also lexical connections between the two poems. Compare with N. A. Nekrasov:
…Alas! while the nations
Dragging in poverty, submitting to scourges,
Like lean herds on mowed meadows ... -
and Pushkin:
Leaning on an alien plow, submitting to whips,
Here lean slavery drags along the reins...
This comparison is intended to once again emphasize the importance of the topic and establish the connection of times.
N. A. Nekrasov proves the urgency of addressing this topic by introducing a description of the life of the people into the Elegy and showing the complete failure of the reform. And therefore, the poem becomes a kind of declaration of N. A. Nekrasov’s attitude to the topic of poetry and understanding of the role of the poet: the poet must have one goal - serving the people - until the people are happy. Nekrasov affirms civic poetry, social poetry. The choice here is not accidental.
genre: elegy is a traditional lyrical genre, the content of which is the love experiences of a lyrical hero. The place of the beloved of N. A. Nekrasov is occupied by the people, the thoughts of the poet are turned to him. However, this love remains unrequited, and hence the tragedy inherent in the sound of the poem arises:
I dedicated the lyre to my people.
Perhaps I will die unknown to him,
But I served him - and my heart is calm ...
These phrases again show a connection with A. S. Pushkin, this time with the poem "Echo":
For every sound
Your response in the empty air
You suddenly give birth.
Well, you have no response ... Such are you, poet!
The only difference is that N. A. Nekrasov connects this topic directly with the people, and the very meaning of the comparison is concretized:
But the one about whom I sing in the evening silence
To whom the poet's dreams are dedicated, -
Alas! he does not heed - and does not give an answer ...
“Does not give an answer” is a clear orientation towards a lyrical digression from the final part of Gogol's poem “Dead Souls”. Not only the people, but also
all of Rus' is that unchanging beloved of N. A. Nekrasov, to whom the best works of the poet are dedicated.
In 1874, and is a response to the numerous attacks and accusations of the poet that in his works he constantly talks about the plight of the common people. In 1861, serfdom was abolished in Russia. The Conservatives were extremely unhappy with this, considering the decree an excessive premature measure. At the same time, their rage against the defenders of the people intensified. Nekrasov reflected his thoughts on the abolition of serfdom in his work, ironically calling it "Elegy". The poem is dedicated to the poet's friend - A. Erakov.
Genre of the poem
Despite its name, the work can be attributed to the genre of civil lyrics, as it expresses the poet's reflections on the remaining difficult situation of the peasants.
Main theme of the poem
The main theme of the poem is the author's rhetorical question about whether the life of the peasantry has really improved. Nekrasov claims that "the suffering of the people" is an inexhaustible theme for creativity. The upper classes cannot enjoy life in peace until the calamity of the common people in the country ceases.
The poet proudly declares: "I dedicated the lyre to my people." He does not care about recognition and honor. Having devoted his whole life to singing the suffering of the peasants, Nekrasov fulfilled his civic duty.
The abolition of serfdom is a "red day" for the poet, who finally brought the long-awaited freedom. However, after several years, Nekrasov begins to be tormented by the thought: is there really an improvement. His reflections on this and questions remain unanswered and hang in the air, inviting readers to answer them for themselves.
Nekrasov makes subtle allusions to the imaginary achievement of prosperity, mentioning the "people's enemy" and sadly noting that the people to whom he dedicates his work "does not heed ... and does not give an answer."
Composition
The poem can be divided into two parts. In the first, Nekrasov points out that creativity must necessarily protect the common people and describe their troubles. The transition to the second is the question: "Are the people happy?" after the reform. The second part consists of the poet's reflections on this painful question.
The size
The poem is written in iambic six-foot, which gives it solemnity and a touch of classicism.
Expressive means
Nekrasov makes extensive use of epithets in describing the plight of the peasantry ("lean herds", "sorrowful ... tune") and his imaginary well-being ("red day", "golden harvest"). The poet compares himself to a warrior fighting for a just cause. The upper classes of society are metaphorically represented in the image of the "people's enemy". The solemnity of the poem is emphasized by the use of high-profile "classic" words: "dragging", "rock", "heed".
The main idea of the poem is not expressed explicitly. The reader himself must guess that the bitter truth is hidden behind the author's lyrical reflections. The people were never delivered from their suffering, only the form changed, but not its age-old dependence itself.
Plan analysis of the poemElegy
- History of creation
- Genre of the work
- The main theme of the work
- Composition
- Artwork size
- The main idea of the poem
Nekrasov worried about the fate of Russia and with all his poetry called for work to transform it into a powerful and happy country.
The poem "Elegy", dedicated to the fate of the motherland and the role of the poet in society, was written by Nekrasov on August 15-17, 1874. The work was not immediately sent to print. Nekrasov decided to wait some time, not to rush to publish such a politically sharp poem - he was afraid of a new censorship storm. The poems were sent on August 29, 1874 to the wife of the poet's sister A.N. Erakov. In an accompanying note, Nekrasov noted that over the last period of creativity, these are “my most sincere and favorite” poems.
The impetus for writing the poem "Elegy" was a lecture by the liberal historian of Russian literature, Orest Miller, in which he claimed that Nekrasov continued to write on the already developed theme of "the suffering of the people." The poet opposes, expresses his opinion, convinces that this topic does not get old.
Compositionally, the poem "Elegy" is divided into four large stanzas of 14, 10, 12, 14 lines, respectively. The poem has an overall high tone. The cross-cutting themes of the poem are the fate of the people in the post-reform era and the poet's mission in society.
The poem "Elegy" is one of the best examples of the poet's civil lyrics.
The problems of the poem
The key issue raised in the "Elegy" - a socio-historical plan - the results of the peasant reform. Problematic questions about the position of the people in the poem are combined with the question of the role of the poet in society.
At the beginning of the poem, the relevance of the theme of "the suffering of the people" is assessed. The lyrical hero brings us up to date - "fashion" says that this topic is old, and poetry should not respond to it. But the lyrical hero does not agree with this. He is of the opinion that for a poet there is nothing more important and essential than “to remind the crowd that the people are in poverty ... to arouse the attention of the powerful of the world to the people ...”
In the second stanza of the poem, the lyrical hero talks about his civic mission, about his duty and responsibility to the people, about the Muse, about the fate of people. The phrase with which the second stanza of the "Elegy" begins has become the leitmotif of all Nekrasov's work:
“I dedicated the lyre to my people”…
The second stanza ends with the poet trying to find an answer to the question: did the reform make the peasants happy? The fetters of serfdom have fallen, "but are the people happy"?
This important theme was developed in the third stanza of the poem: “Have you become more tolerable, peasant suffering?”
The third stanza begins with peaceful pictures of peasant life. The reapers sing songs over the golden harvest, an old man walks, a contented child runs, sickles and scythes work properly. With what love Nekrasov tells about simple peasant everyday life. The poet highly valued the Russian people, wished him boundless happiness, thought about him, worried about him:
"I'm looking for answers to secret questions,
Boiling in the mind…”
What questions did N.A. Nekrasov look for answers to? Has the life of the peasants changed for the better after the tsar signed the Manifesto on the abolition of serfdom?
"Freedom has finally made a difference?"
There is no answer to this question in the third stanza.
The final stanza of the "Elegy" begins with the words: "Already the evening is coming ...". These words seem to take us back to the past. They remind us of Zhukovsky's elegy "Evening" (1806), in which there are these words: "It's already evening ... the edges of the clouds have faded ..."
The intonation at the beginning of the final stanza is thoughtful. Topics of thought - nature, creative inspiration. The second half of the stanza is more decisive. The loud song of the poet is echoed by valleys, fields, mountains, the forest responds. But the one from whom the poet is waiting for an answer is silent. The call, the prayers of the poet have not yet been heard.
What was the purpose of the author when writing the poem "Elegy"?
"Elegy" was a veiled call to the youth to fight for the true emancipation of the peasantry. If we turn to the draft version of the poem, then in it you can find the following words:
“Oh, Russian youth! There are topics above fashion:
Ages do not age them! .. "
With a deeper analysis of the "Elegy", it becomes clear that Nekrasov relied in this poem on the principles of Pushkin's freedom-loving lyrics - "Village", "Echo", "Monument". “Dragging”, “skinny”, “obeying the scourges” - there is a roll call with Pushkin's “Village”.
Both poets went their own ways in poetry, but the merits of both before the Fatherland and Russian literature are priceless.
the main idea poem "Elegy" - the long-awaited peasant reform did not bring happiness to the peasants. We need to go further.
A characteristic feature of the work is an example of a new type of elegy, a social elegy.
Reading the work, you can see that in the poem Nekrasov is not talking about the disaster of one people, but about the disaster of peoples (in the plural):
"... while the nations Dragging in poverty, submitting to scourges, .."
This is also emphasized in Nekrasov’s other works completed in the same 1874 - “The Terrible Year” and “The Honest, Valiantly Fallen Silenced ...”
The poetic size of the poem "Elegy" is iambic six-foot with the use of pyrrhic (omission of stresses). The poem uses an adjacent rhyming scheme (aabb) using both feminine rhymes (aa lines) and masculine rhymes (bb lines).
Means of artistic expression
Epithets - "changeable fashion", "God's world", "a contented child", "secret questions", "long slavery", "living embodiment", "distant mountains"
Metaphors - "red day", "golden harvest", "cool twilight"
Appeals - "Do not believe, young men!"
Personification - "And the forest responded ..."
The archaic form of the verb is used - “grows old”
Comparison - "Like lean herds on mowed meadows ..."
Rhetorical question - "What could the lyre serve more worthily?"
Phraseologism - "the powerful of the world"
Exclamations - "Alas!", "But everyone go to battle!"
What do you remember about Nekrasov's poem "Elegy"?
An unusual combination of the form of a poetic work and its content. It would seem that an elegy is a rather sentimental genre. But Nekrasov approached the issue in an innovative way - he creates a social elegy. This undoubtedly enriched the poetry.
I remember the poem "Elegy" by the fact that once again Nekrasov shows indifference, as a poet, reacts sharply to the surrounding reality, stands up for a better lot for his people.
1. Introduction
2. The history of the creation of the poem "Elegy"
3. What was the impetus for writing the poem?
4. Composition
5. Topics raised in the poem, what type of lyrics does it belong to?
6. Issues
7. Summary
8. The main idea of the poem "Elegy"
9. A characteristic feature of the poem
10. Poetic meter
11. Means of artistic expression
12. What do you remember about the poem?
