Krylov's fables are an excellent school of observations of life, phenomena, characters. Fables are of interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. Each read fable causes a person to think.

Reading the fable "Demyan's Ear", you understand: the story that the author tells is not at all about the specific Demyan and Foka, and not about the ear and excessive hospitality. Demyan personifies such traits as obsession, captiousness, importunity, inability to respect the desires of another person. And the fable also teaches: beautiful intentions do not always have good consequences.

The inability to work together, caring about the common cause, and not about their own tastes, is personified by the characters of the fable "Swan, Pike and Cancer". The last line of this fable - "But things are still there" - became a catch phrase. Sometimes with the help of these words they characterize the state of affairs of a person who is not able to complete what he started. The fable helps to understand: before taking on some business, you need to carefully weigh both your capabilities and the capabilities of your accomplices. Otherwise, “only flour” will come out of that case.

Krylov exposes the ignoramus and the ignorant in the fable "The Monkey and Glasses". Some people are very similar to the character of the fable: unable to understand some phenomenon, they deny or forbid it. Many characters in Krylov's fables seem to have come from folk tales. Their "characters" are well known, but the author creates situations in which their essence is revealed.

The fox is a character in many fairy tales. This image is used when you need to portray cunning, cunning. In the fable "The Crow and the Fox" it is cunning that helps the Fox to take possession of a piece of cheese. But the fable condemns not cunning and cunning, but sycophancy and those who believe in any words, so that only they are pleasant. Krylov's fables expose various flaws in human characters and teach the art of living with dignity.

General and excellent Krylov's fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" and Aesop's fable of the same name

It is known that the plots of many fables originated in antiquity, but fabulists from different countries use them to write new works.

How a new work arises on the basis of a well-known plot, let's try to explore this using the example of Aesop's and Krylov's fables.

Aesop is a legendary poet who is considered the founder of the fable genre. Aesop's fables are prosaic, narrative, concise. The main attention is paid to the clash between the carriers of certain traits or different life positions. In the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb", the characters of the characters are clearly defined: the Lamb represents defenselessness, the Wolf represents strength. The moral that emerges from this is that just defense has no effect on those who intend to do injustice.

Unlike Aesop, Krylov placed the moral of his fable at the beginning, but the development of events in the fable is not perceived as a simple illustration of morality. For Krylov, the wolf becomes the embodiment of an inexorable evil force, cruelty and self-will, and the development of the plot before our eyes reveals the mechanism of action of this cruel force. Readers become witnesses of everything that happens to the characters.

At the beginning of the fable, the Lamb is not afraid of the Wolf, because he does not harm anyone and does not violate the established rules. The senseless accusations that the Wolf makes, the Lamb easily refutes. There is self-respect in the Lamb's answers. For a moment, it even seems to readers that the Lamb has driven the Wolf into a dead end, because the predator has no more arguments to accuse. But from this it does not at all emerge that after meeting with the Wolf the Lamb will remain unharmed. Just the opposite. Each worthy answer of the Lamb annoys the Wolf even more. Finally, the masterful predator gets tired of looking for the imaginary guilt of his victim and he shows his essence. The last words of the fable: "He said - and the Wolf dragged the Lamb into the dark forest" - at the same time expected and unexpected. The reader knew from the very beginning that this was bound to happen, but, watching the development of events, he hoped that the Lamb would still bring his innocence.

In the fables of Aesop and Krylov, the plot, characters and even morality are common. Aesop's fable is written in prose, and Krylov's in poems. But, in my opinion, the most important thing that distinguishes these two fables is the very reader's perception of the works. Aesop's fable appeals, so to speak, to the mind of the reader. And Krylov's fable is to his heart.

1 option

1! nni I. L. Krylov is known and loved by adults and children, because they are written in a simple, bright, lively language, and their meaning is clear to everyone. The favorite technique of the great fabulist is allegory. Ordinary people hide under the sight of lowing, bleating, growling heroes of his works. Emphasizing the merits of some, I. A. Krylov with humor denounces and ridicules the shortcomings of others. So, in his fable “The Wolf in the Kennel”, the poet exposes the cowardly, deceitful and hypocritical nature of the toothy predator, exalting the wisdom and worldly experience of the old hunter.

Reading the fable "The Donkey and the Nightingale", we laugh at the pompous words of the Donkey, advising the feathered master of singing, the Nightingale, to take lessons from the rooster: "If only you were more sharpened when you learned a little from him."

Sluggish, inactive judges in the Pike fable also arouse the author's ridicule. Resigned stupid Donkeys, Goats and old Nags are deftly commanded by the cunning Fox, appointed by the Prosecutor "for due supervision in the order of affairs." She is no stranger to such matters and skillfully saves the criminal Pike, who "provided the fish table" to her, condemning "both scary and dangerous" to drown her in the river.

Time passes, but even today, like two hundred years ago, we meet with ignorance and deceit, stupidity and pride. That is why the fables of I. A. Krylov remain not only close and understandable, but also beloved by readers of different ages.

Option 2

I. A. Krylov is a famous Russian fabulist. In his fables, he ridicules human shortcomings and vices, such as stupidity, anger, deceit, cunning, hypocrisy, boastfulness, opposes lawlessness and injustice. We laugh heartily at the Donkey from the fable "The Donkey and the Nightingale", who took it into his head to teach the Nightingale the art of singing.

Of course, everyone knows that the Nightingale is an unsurpassed master of his craft, and the Donkey is too far from music to act as a judge on this matter. After all, it is no accident that he considers the loud-mouthed rooster to be the standard of singing art. But, unfortunately, in real life we ​​often meet people who try to judge something in which they understand absolutely nothing.

No less revealing is the fable "Pike", in which Krylov denounces nepotism and bribery, the unscrupulousness of the powerful of this world. Thus, the fox-prosecutor, whom the robber Pike “provided with a fish table”, suggests that the judges drown the guilty person in the river as a “shameful execution”, to which they agree.

But, fortunately, in the end, there is a tamer for any villain, like for a Wolf who wanted to climb into a sheepfold, but ended up in a kennel, where the hunter finished with him.

The fables of I. A. Krylov conquer the reader with their wisdom and subtle understanding of the human essence, help him become better, cleaner, kinder.

The fables of Ivan Andreevich Krylov appeared, as a rule, in connection with certain events in the life of Russian society. They were often a reaction to specific circumstances or the actions of specific people: high-ranking officials, writers with a dubious reputation. Readers of fables, mainly those who were aware of the events of public life, easily recognized the "heroes". Krylov immediately reacted to the immorality, irresponsibility that took place. He was in society in a position that can be described as “the conscience of the people.”

The events of the Krylov era have gone into oblivion, but the lessons of the wise fabulist continue to this day. What is the reason that centuries later, the “Krylov School of Morality” did not close, it continues to function to this day?

The secret, most likely, is not only in the honed literary skill of the fable author, but also in the fact that Krylov not only revealed, designated and stigmatized vices, but that he constantly developed positive principles, created a real philosophical system of educating generations.

What shortcomings did the fabulist ridicule and criticize in his works? They are as old as the world. Greed, insatiability, stinginess, swindle, falsehood, duplicity, senselessness, craftiness, flattery. The heroes of Krylov's fables have found refuge in a world where hypocrisy flourishes, laziness, cowardice, boasting prevail.

Why are newly-minted Musicians bad (fable by I.A. Krylov “Musicians”)? “With excellent behavior”, but the main skill that they must demonstrate is that they cannot sing, unfortunately. So what are these musicians then? They didn't mind their own business. If you don’t master the craft, don’t take it on, don’t make people laugh.

The “mechanics sage” from the fable “Larchik” is also good for everyone, but he just couldn’t open the props. The “sage-master” turned it from different sides, depicting violent activity, but only the result is not visible. And in deeds, the main thing is not words - but the result.

And how do you like Pike, who volunteered to chase mice (“Pike and the Cat”)?

In all these fables, Krylov clearly demonstrates empty pursuits, deviation from the true cause, amateurism.

In the fable "The Monkey and Glasses" - the stupidity of an uneducated person.
In the fable "The Crow and the Fox" - flattery, stupidity.
In the fable "Elephant and Pug" - boasting.

It is not common for people to show their shortcomings - most try to veil them, to give them an attractive wrapper. Demonstrating shortcomings and inability is not accepted.

However, no matter how you hide them, they will still show up. And Krylov knew this very well. He himself, who began his career in the eleventh year of his life, had seen enough of everyone. From childhood, he noticed what was happening in society, accumulated impressions of life's turmoil, which later found its reflection in his fables.

asni Krylova is a wonderful school of observations of life, phenomena, characters. Fables are of interest both in dynamic plots and in the depiction of the characters of the characters, in particular animals, insects, birds. Each read fable causes a person to think.

Reading the fable "Demyanov's Ear", you understand: the story that the author tells is not at all about the specific Demyan and Foka, and not about the ear and excessive hospitality. Demyan personifies such traits as obsession, captiousness, importunity, inability to respect the desires of another person. And the fable also teaches: beautiful intentions do not always have good consequences.

The inability to work together, caring about the common cause, and not about their own tastes, is personified by the characters of the fable "Swan, Pike and Cancer". The last line of this fable - "But things are still there" - became a catch phrase. Sometimes with the help of these words they characterize the state of affairs of a person who is not able to complete what he started. The fable helps to understand: before taking on some business, you need to carefully weigh both your capabilities and the capabilities of your accomplices. Otherwise, “only flour” will come out of that case.

The ignoramus and the ignorant are exposed by Krylov in the fable "The Monkey and Glasses". Some people are very similar to the character of the fable: unable to understand some phenomenon, they deny or forbid it. Many characters in Krylov's fables seem to have come from folk tales. Their "characters" are well known, but the author creates situations in which their essence is revealed.

The fox is a character in many fairy tales. This image is used when you need to portray cunning, cunning. In the fable "The Crow and the Fox" it is cunning that helps the Fox to take possession of a piece of cheese. But the fable condemns not cunning and cunning, but sycophancy and those who believe in any words, so that only they are pleasant. Krylov's fables expose various flaws in human characters and teach the art of living with dignity.

General and excellent Krylov's fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" and Aesop's fable of the same name

It is known that the plots of many fables originated in antiquity, but fabulists from different countries use them to write new works.

How a new work arises on the basis of a well-known plot, let's try to explore this using the example of Aesop's and Krylov's fables.

Aesop is a legendary poet who is considered the founder of the fable genre. Aesop's fables are prosaic, narrative, concise. The main attention is paid to the clash between the carriers of certain traits or different life positions. In the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb", the characters of the characters are clearly defined: the Lamb represents defenselessness, the Wolf represents strength. The moral that emerges from this is that just defense has no effect on those who intend to do injustice.

Unlike Aesop, Krylov placed the moral of his fable at the beginning, but the development of events in the fable is not perceived as a simple illustration of morality. For Krylov, the wolf becomes the embodiment of an inexorable evil force, cruelty and self-will, and the development of the plot before our eyes reveals the mechanism of action of this cruel force. Readers become witnesses of everything that happens to the characters.

At the beginning of the fable, the Lamb is not afraid of the Wolf, because he does not harm anyone and does not violate the established rules. The senseless accusations that the Wolf makes, the Lamb easily refutes. There is self-respect in the Lamb's answers. For a moment, it even seems to readers that the Lamb has driven the Wolf into a dead end, because the predator has no more arguments to accuse. But from this it does not at all emerge that after meeting with the Wolf the Lamb will remain unharmed. Just the opposite. Each worthy answer of the Lamb annoys the Wolf even more. Finally, the masterful predator gets tired of looking for the imaginary guilt of his victim and he shows his essence. The last words of the fable: "He said - and the Wolf dragged the Lamb into the dark forest" - at the same time expected and unexpected. The reader knew from the very beginning that this was bound to happen, but, watching the development of events, he hoped that the Lamb would still bring his innocence.

A person has so many sides of the coin that sometimes it is simply not possible to understand all their shades. We are arranged like the most difficult puzzle, which not everyone can solve. That is why it is so difficult for us to build human relationships. That is why wars, disasters, and destruction happen on the planet. Sometimes it seems to me that the instinct of greed and ruthlessness dominates in a person. We watch how even small children fight over their toys, not wanting to share. There are often drunkards on the streets who do not want to solve their problems, but simply fill them with alcohol, while losing their housing, earnings, and food. There are also quarrels between a mother and a child who refuse to understand each other and simply take into account the needs of each.

What traits should be ridiculed in fables? What should be shown first of all in the lines of literature? How to reach the heart and mind of people who have gone astray?

I consider the fables of I. A. Krylov, who tries to draw attention to any screaming situation in human relationships, to be the most appropriate and targeted. The author is able to notice all the subtle reasons for the problematic quarrels and highlight them in a broader light so that anyone can read such an important, from his point of view, truth and morality. Every person needs to read his fables. They contain the depth of folk wisdom. Krylov is a master of his craft. From under his pen flew wisdom and tips imprinted in the centuries to anyone who wants to become more perfect in their actions.

Among Krylov's heroes, the reader can recognize himself and his loved ones. The fabulist managed to pick up that universal language that is understandable to anyone who dares to go over his lines. In his fables, we see the ridicule of lies, impudence, stupidity. He does not forget about cunning and greed, anger and deceit. It is also worth remembering the ridicule of unskilledness, which ruins people's lives. So, in the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" "the weak are always to blame for the strong." The wolf does not see his guilt and responsibility, he is always looking for the guilty.

Personally, I really like Krylov's fables, because they are saturated with deep morality and breadth of thought. The author skillfully depicts human vices and helps the reader to understand what is good and what is bad. This is especially important for the younger generation, which is just learning to live and understand moral principles.