Complicated forms are characteristic of both simple and compound verbal predicates.

1. Forms of a simple verbal predicate can be complicated by particles or repetitions: And he, a hare, will have a heart that will roll! (S.-SH.); Rodion Potapych lived alive at his mine (M.-S.). The complicating element does not change the real meaning of the predicate, the meanings or shades introduced by it are of an abstract modal-expressive nature: assessments of the mode of action or the attitude of the speaker to action. The elimination of a particle or repetition does not destroy the predicate - only the additional meaning is lost (cf .: The hare's heart will roll; Rodion Potapych lived in his mine) ".

The particles complicating the predicate are numerous and varied in meaning. A particle for yourself (know yourself) expresses a shade of inflexibility of the action, indicates its flow in spite of obstacles: A dried vobla looks at itself, without blinking, at human delusions and throws stones at itself (S.-Shch.). A similar meaning can be expressed by a particle like this: Doctor Voznesensky never came to tea at four o'clock (S.-Ts.). But most often this particle indicates the completeness, intensity or duration of the action: Both hares died (S.-Shch.). .

Repetition as a formal means of complicating the predicate consists in connecting two identical conjugated forms of the same verb or conjugated form and infinitive, as well as a conjugated form with a single-root adverb on -th, -mya (they shout with a cry, roar with a roar, etc.). The repetition in the form of doubling the conjugated forms of the verb introduces a shade of duration, the fullness of the action: The shoemaker fought, fought, and, finally, grabbed his mind (Krylov). The combination of an infinitive with a single-root conjugated form has an additional shade of concession or doubt about the appropriateness of the action: Mityunka adopted this attitude, but no, no, he will come up with it in his own way (Bazhov); I remember, but what's the point? [Ibid., 315].

2. In complicated forms of CGS, not one, but two grammatical meanings of a phase or modal type are expressed. This means that in addition to the main, real infinitive component, the compound form includes at least two auxiliary units. A complicated form of a compound verbal predicate: the auxiliary component is complicated, the real meaning of the predicate is not affected. Wed: continued to work - wanted to continue working, was ready to continue working, expressed a desire to continue working. The complication lies in the fact that the auxiliary component has indicators of two or more particular meanings - modal and phase, and its structure duplicates the structure of the compound verb predicate as a whole: The next morning, Akulina wanted to try and write (Pushkin); Shubin wanted to start working, but the clay crumbled (Turgenev). It is possible to combine several values. At the same time, the structure of the auxiliary component becomes more complicated, but it can include only one conjugated form, all other verbs are used in the infinitive: I could not decide to continue working, I had to be ready to continue working, I had to stop trying to work. The complicated form of the compound verbal predicate remains two-component (the main component is the full-valued verb to work).

Complicated forms of a simple verbal predicate include a combination of two verbs or a combination of a verb with different particles. This includes:

1. A combination of two verbs in the same form, of which the first indicates the action, and the second - the purpose of this action: I will go for a walk in the garden; Sit down and write a letter to your mother.

2. Connection with the help of unions and, yes, yes, and the form of the verb to take and the same form of another verb to denote an arbitrary action, due to the personal whim of the subject: I will take it and do the opposite; He took it and left completely.

3. A combination of two single-root verbs and a particle not between them, with the modal meaning of impossibility: We are waiting for spring; Breathe not inhale the wonderful, mountain air.

4. The combination of the infinitive with the personal form of the same verb, which is preceded by the particle not, to enhance the negative meaning of the predicate: It does not work itself, and it interferes with others.

5. The combination of turnover only and do (doing, doing, etc.), which is followed by a verb in the same form to indicate the intensity of the action: He only does what he draws.

6. Repetition of the predicate to indicate the duration of the action: Food, food in an open field.

7. Repetition of a predicate with an intensifying particle so to indicate an action that has been fully implemented: I really sang so sang.

8. The combination of the verb with the particle know or know for yourself to denote an action that is performed despite obstacles: And he knows himself chuckles.

A simple verbal predicate expressed by a combination of two verbs or a combination of a verb with different particles.

1) A combination of two verbs in the same form, of which the first indicates an action, and the second indicates the purpose of this action. Let's go throw ourselves at the feet of your parents(Pushkin).

2) Repetition of the predicate to indicate the duration of the action. Floated, floated in the blue vague depth foamed by the wind on the block(Sholokhov).

3) The repetition of the predicate with an intensifying particle so to indicate a high degree of the action carried out. Now he really sang so sang.

4) A combination of two single-root verbs and a particle not between them, with the modal meaning of impossibility. We can't wait for good weather. Breathe not inhale the wonderful mountain air.

5) The combination of the infinitive with the personal form of the same verb, which is preceded by the particle not, to further enhance the negative meaning of the predicate. I didn’t become stupid, but my feelings somehow dulled(Ch e x about v).

6) Connection with the help of conjunctions and, yes, yes, and take the form of the verb and the same form of another verb to denote an arbitrary action due to the personal whim of the subject. He took yes and hid(Bazhov).

7) The combination of turnover only and do (doing, doing, etc.) with the subsequent verb in the same form to indicate the intensity of the action. All he does is paint endlessly.

8) The combination of the verb in the personal form or in the form of the infinitive with the particle let's (let's) to express an invitation or motivation for joint action. Let's talk(Chekhov). Come fight me(Bitter).

9) The combination of the verb with the particle know (know yourself) to denote an action that is performed despite obstacles. They scold him, but he knows we are sleeping and does not want to hear anything. And he laughs to himself.

10) The combination of a verb with a particle to itself to express a process that takes place, as it were, independently of the will of a person. On a long evening, it happened, he would light a torch and spin it for himself, without closing his eyes(I. Nikitin).

• - VERB WORD...

  Literary Encyclopedia

• - predicate the main member of the sentence, meaning an event. It is expressed by a verb, as well as a noun, adjective, adverb; cf .: He is yearning / He is in anguish / The year was successful ...

  Literary Encyclopedia

• - VERB WORD...

  Dictionary of literary terms

• - PREDICATE or predicate. The term S. is used in different meanings: 1 ...

  Dictionary of literary terms

• - usually expressed by the personal form of the verb, which "represents the sign at the time of its occurrence" ...

  Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Euphron

• - one of the two main members of a two-part sentence; correlates with the subject ...

  Great Soviet Encyclopedia

• - An unchanging word, sometimes coinciding in its sound composition with an onomatopoeic word or an interjection and used in the function of a verbal predicate with the meaning of an instantaneous action in the past ...
• - A predicate expressed by a verb in a personal form ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - A predicate formed by the form of the indicative, imperative, subjunctive moods. The sounds of a waltz echo through the water. Tell me about the branchy wheat or the agronomist, but keep quiet about the plans ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - see verb management ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - A simple verbal predicate that does not agree with the subject in person or number or both. It does not agree: 1) there is a predicate expressed by a verb, with a subject that has a plural form ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - A simple sentence, which includes: a) isolated turns. It was a pale, tiny creature, like a flower that had grown without the rays of the sun...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - see the verb predicate ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - see the verbal predicate compound ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms

• - A kind of predicate, the main component of which is represented by: 1) the form of the infinitive of a full-valued verb; 2) verb phraseology ...

  Syntax: Dictionary

• - A kind of predicate, the main component of which is represented by: 1) the form of the infinitive of a full-valued verb; 2) verb phraseology; 3) descriptive verb-nominal turnover: The water on the lake began to freeze ...

  Dictionary of linguistic terms T.V. Foal

"complicated verbal predicate" in books

Predicate. Ante mortem

From the book Herman. Interview. Essay. Scenario author Dolin Anton

Predicate. Ante mortem Imaginary illustration: Pieter Brueghel the Elder, Magpie on the Gallows Khrustalev, car! (1998) - the universe, organized according to the laws of the highest, not subject to human interpretations, absurdity. Chaos, which condenses to almost absolute (but, to the horror

NOT VERB TENSE

From the book Fragments from Nothing the author Vantalov Boris

NOT VERB TIME On October 2, an exhibition opened (three sculptors, my graphics) in the former library of Blok on Nevsky. Strange people asked me what a knot means instead of a causal place. They couldn't understand that a knot is a knot. I write about these nodules already

author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 184

From the book Spelling and Style Guide author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 184. The predicate with the subject - quantitative-nominal combination (countable turnover) In the construction under consideration, the predicate can have both the singular and the plural form. Wed: Seven people of the chase entered ... (Leskov). - The next morning, fifty-seven workers

From the book Spelling and Style Guide author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 186. Predicate with a subject of the type brother and sister 1. With a subject of the specified type, formed by the combination "nominative plus preposition s plus instrumental", the predicate can stand both in the plural and in the singular. The form

§ 187. Predicate with subject - pronoun interrogative, relative, indefinite, negative

From the book Spelling and Style Guide author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 187. The predicate with the subject - interrogative, relative, indefinite, negative pronoun

§ 183. Predicate with a subject that has a collective noun in its composition

author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 183. Predicate with a subject that has a collective noun in its composition

§ 184

From the book A Guide to Spelling, Pronunciation, Literary Editing author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 184. The predicate with the subject - quantitative-nominal combination (countable turnover) In the construction under consideration, the predicate can have both the singular and the plural form. Wed: Seven people of the chase entered ... (Leskov). - The next morning, fifty-seven immigrants

§ 186. Predicate with a subject of the type brother and sister

From the book A Guide to Spelling, Pronunciation, Literary Editing author Rosenthal Ditmar Elyashevich

§ 186. Predicate with a subject of the type brother and sister 1. With the turns of the indicated type, formed by the combination “nominative plus instrumental with the preposition c”, the predicate can stand both in the plural and in the singular. Form

predicate (predicate)

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (PR) of the author TSB

Predicate

From the book Great Soviet Encyclopedia (SK) of the author TSB

7.15. Predicate. Types of the predicate and ways of expressing it

author Guseva Tamara Ivanovna

7.15. Predicate. Types of the predicate and ways of expressing it The predicate is the main member of the sentence, expressing the sign of the subject and answering the questions: what does the subject do? what is he? who is he? what is it? Predicates are divided into verbal and nominal.

7.16. Predicate expressed by adverb and interjection

From the book Modern Russian. Practical guide author Guseva Tamara Ivanovna

7.16. Predicate expressed by adverb and interjection The predicate can be expressed by an adverb with or without a bunch, for example: “I was married at your age” (L. Tolstoy); “How inopportunely this memory was” (Ch.); “After all, I am somewhat akin to her” (Gr.). The nominal part is expressed

Complicated grief

From the book Change Your Brain - Age Will Change! by Amen Daniel J.

Complicated Grief At some point in our lives, we all experience grief, whether it be the death of a loved one, divorce, or other loss. And although we will never forget the loss, over time, the memories will become less painful and begin to bring more warm feelings. How much should

Lesson 2.3 Predicate. Modal verbs. Properties. Translation

From the book English Grammar with Vasya Pupkin author Gorodnyuk Natalia

Lesson 2.3 Predicate. Modal verbs. Properties. Translation N: Now that we have examined the various types of subjects, it is worth paying our attention to the predicate. We have already said that after the subject there should always be a predicate, and now our task is to

Complicated types of compound predicates

In speech, quite often you can find compound predicates, which consist not of two, but of three (and sometimes four) structural parts.

Structural complication of compound verbal predicate

1. Auxiliary parta compound verbal predicate can be expressed not by a verb, but by a compound nominal predicate (link + short adjective / adverb).

Complicated CGS = SIS + subjective infinitive

He must leave.

As in any compound verbal predicate, two parts can be distinguished here: the main part is expressed by the subject infinitive ( leave ). Auxiliary part - short adjective must - has a modal meaning, but unlike modal verbs ( maybe wants ) adjective cannot indicate tense and mood. Therefore, the adjective requires a verb copula (in this case it is a verb to be in null form). Therefore, inside the compound verbal predicate, one more thing can be distinguished - a compound nominal micropredicate ( must + zero link).

Modal short adjectives most often act as the nominal part of such micropredicates:; noun with preposition able ; adverbs: it is necessary, it is necessary, it is impossible, it is possible, it is a pity, it is a pity and etc.

This predicate is actually not complicated. In Russian, for example, there are no verbs with the modal meaning of obligation, necessity, inevitability, etc. These meanings are always expressed by short adjectives or adverbs. Therefore, compound verbal predicates with such a meaning of the auxiliary part always include in their composition a compound nominal micropredicate.

Note!

Adjectives: must, must, ready, compelled, able, glad, adverbs: need, need, can't, can, sorry- very often confused with verbs, because they are similar in function to them.

Check yourself in the above way: put the micropredicate in the past tense - they will not have a suffix -l, but a bunch was, was, was, were(was forced, had to, was sorry, had to).

2. Main body of a compound verbal predicate can be represented by a compound verbal predicate: an infinitive with a phase or modal meaning and an infinitive with a main lexical meaning.

Complicated cgs = auxiliary verb + cgs

He wanted to start working.

Main part (get started ) can act as an independent compound verb predicate (cf.:He started to work).

3. Auxiliary partcompound verbal predicate is expressed by a compound nominal micropredicate with a modal meaning (must, must, must, cannot etc.) and the main part expressed by a compound verbal predicate (two infinitives).

Complicated SGS = SIS + SGS

He was forced to start working.

Auxiliary part ( was forced ) - a compound nominal predicate with a modal meaning and an independent predicate cannot be. Main part ( start working ) is expressed by two infinitives (the first - with a phase meaning, the second - with the main lexical meaning). In another context, these two verbs can become an independent compound verb predicate (cf.:He started to work).

Structural complication of compound nominal predicate

A compound nominal predicate can also be complicated if its connective (in this case it is put in an indefinite form) is complicated by conjugated forms of phase or modal verbs (or compound nominal predicates with a modal meaning).

Complicated SIS \u003d auxiliary verb + copula-infinitive + nominal part

I I want to become a doctor.

In this case, the predicate consists of the union of two predicates: a compound nominal ( To become a doctor ) and compound verb ( I want to be ). Sometimes such a predicate is called complex or mixed.

Complicated SIS \u003d compound nominal micropredicate + copula-infinitive + nominal part of SIS

I should have become a doctor.

In this case, the predicate can be represented as a combination of three predicates: a compound nominal ( had ), compound verb (should have become) and compound nominal ( To become a doctor ).

Plan for parsing a complicated predicate

1. Indicate the type of predicate according to the part in which the main lexical meaning is expressed (complicated compound verbal predicate, complicated compound nominal predicate).
2. Disassemble each part of the predicate according to the corresponding plan.

Sample parsing

I must leave today.

Gotta leave - a complicated compound verb predicate. Main part leave expressed by the subjective infinitive. Auxiliary part must has a modal meaning and is expressed by a compound nominal predicate, in which the main part should be expressed by a short adjective; zero connective indicates the present tense of the indicative mood.

I I want to become a doctor.

I want to become a doctor become a doctor ; auxiliary part want has a modal meaning and is expressed by a verb in the present tense of the indicative mood.

I should become a doctor.

Should be a doctor- a complicated compound nominal predicate. nominal part ( doctor ) is expressed by a noun in the instrumental case; semisignificant copula become is part of a compound verbal predicate in which the main part is expressed by the infinitive become ; auxiliary part must has a modal meaning and is expressed by a compound nominal predicate. It has a nominal part must expressed by a short adjective; zero connective indicates the present tense of the indicative mood.

Complicated forms of a simple verbal predicate include a combination of two verbs or a combination of a verb with different particles. This includes:
A combination of two verbs in the same form, of which the first indicates the action, and the second - the purpose of this action: I will go for a walk in the garden; Sit down and write a letter to your mother.
Connection with the help of unions and, yes, yes, and the form of the verb to take and the same form of another verb to denote an arbitrary action, due to the personal whim of the subject: I will take and do the opposite; He took it and left completely.
A combination of two single-root verbs and a particle not between them, with the modal meaning of impossibility: We are waiting for spring; Breathe not inhale the wonderful, mountain air.
The combination of the infinitive with the personal form of the same verb, which is preceded by the particle not, to enhance the negative meaning of the predicate: It does not work itself, and it interferes with others.
The combination of turnover is only doing (doing, doing, etc.), which is followed by a verb in the same form to indicate the intensity of the action: He only does what he draws.
Repetition of the predicate to indicate the duration of the action: Food, food in an open field.
The repetition of the predicate with an intensifying particle is so to indicate an action that has been fully implemented: I really sang so sang.
The connection of the verb with the particle know or know for yourself to denote an action that is performed despite obstacles: And he knows himself chuckles.