Language is a means of communication, the language of society. Language as the most important means of communication and as the immediate reality of thought

Do we know our native language? Of course, everyone will answer in the affirmative, because language is our main means of communication! But it turns out that grammar is only a component of the language, and the essence is not only in it. The bottom line is that language, as a means of communication, is the main component of speech.

Language is a historically formed system of meaningful forms, with its help people can turn their thoughts into a kind of public property and even into the spiritual wealth of society.

We all think we can communicate, but more often than not, ours is just a banal exchange of information. However, everyone knows that the concept of "communication" can be much broader, deeper. This becomes clear when looking into the past. Educated people, since the sixteenth century, have communicated at a level that we simply cannot communicate at. Language served as a means of communication, but not only - it was a means of knowledge, a real art. Now we console ourselves, justifying ourselves with a lack of time, and continue to communicate, alas, at a fairly low, limited level.

The nature of language as a means of communication

Such a means of communication as language was formed historically, as human society and its needs developed. The nature of the language is symbolic, which means that every word that is a sign has a clear connection with objects and phenomena of the outside world. For each word, as a sign, historically, for several millennia, a certain meaning was assigned, understandable only to that group of people who know and use this language.

The nature of language stands out in its dual function: it is both an instrument of thought and a way of communication for people. Language also keeps the spiritual values ​​of society, works as a mechanism of social, cultural heredity.

With the development of technical and social progress, mankind slowly but surely expanded the range of its needs, because of this, the language also improved and developed, its vocabulary increased, its grammatical essence became more perfect. All this today allows society to transmit not only absolutely any information, but also many details of the information object, any of its shades.

Language is a means of communication and knowledge, but not only. It is also a means of accumulating and transferring social experience. Thanks to communication using language, the reflection of reality in the minds of one person is supplemented by what was in the minds of other people, because of this process, opportunities for information exchange grow.

Language and other means of communication

Communication with words (verbal)- the main, most perfect form of communication. The level of language proficiency, culture and richness of speech determine the possibilities of communication, its effectiveness. But, in addition to language, there are other means of communication, these are: gestures, pauses, intonations, manners and even the appearance of a person. Communication, being a live communication of subjects, quite naturally shows the emotions of those who communicate, while it creates a non-verbal aspect of the exchange of information, information.

Non-verbal communication is a special language of feelings, a product of the development of people. She has the property significantly enhance the meaningful effect of verbal communication. Sometimes, under certain circumstances, non-verbal communication can replace verbal communication. For example, silence can sometimes be more eloquent than words, and glances can convey more feelings than sentences.

And the means of communication can be musical sounds, deeds and actions, images, drawings, drawings, symbols, signs and even mathematical formulas! The sign language of the deaf and dumb is also a means of communication. The main thing that people should remember when using means of communication is that it is important to maintain clarity of thought, and then the language of communication will always be clear.

Subject: " Russian language »

On this topic: " Language as the most important means of human communication »

INTRODUCTION

In ancient Greece and Rome, the culture of the native word was already developing. The ancient world brought up wonderful poets, writers, playwrights - masters of artistic speech. This world gave stories of outstanding speakers who raised and solved important issues of speech skills. In society, the understanding of the usefulness and necessity of good speech grew, respect for those who knew how to appreciate and successfully use their native language was strengthened. Techniques for exemplary use of language were studied in special schools.

Later, in various countries, including Russia, advanced social circles jealously protected their native language from damage and distortion. The consciousness of the fact that speech is a powerful force, if a person is willing and able to use it, grew stronger. This consciousness became the clearer and more definite, the more successful and wider the development of artistic, scientific and journalistic literature.

In Russia, the struggle for speech culture was fully developed in the works of M. V. Lomonosov and A. S. Pushkin, N. V. Gogol and I. S. Turgenev, N. A. Nekrasov and A. P., Chekhov, A. I. Kuprin and M. Gorky - in the work of those whom we call the classics of the Russian artistic word; political and judicial figures, orators, scientists contributed to the formation of exemplary Russian speech.

In their practical activities and theoretical statements, an understanding of the multifaceted role of language in the development of fiction, science, and journalism was becoming more and more distinct. The originality, richness and beauty of the Russian language, the participation of the people in its development were increasingly appreciated. The activities of the revolutionary democrats - V. G. Belinsky, A. I. Herzen, N. G. Chernyshevsky, N. A. Dobrolyubov, N. A. Nekrasov, M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin - made it possible to understand even more deeply the national significance of the language and participation of literature in its improvement.

Marxist philosophical doctrine played an important role in the development of correct views on language. K. Marx and F. Engels in "The German Ideology" (1845-1846) formulated the famous philosophical definition of language. It expresses thoughts about language as a means of communication and cognition of reality, about the unity of language and thinking, about the initial connection of language with the life of society.

The Marxist understanding of the role of language in people's lives is briefly and clearly conveyed by the well-known words of V. I. Lenin - "language is the most important means of human communication." The need for communication was the main reason for the emergence of language in the distant past. The same need is the main external reason for the development of the language throughout the life of society.

Communication of people with the help of language consists in the "exchange" of thoughts, feelings, experiences, moods.

Words, combinations of words and sentences express certain results of people's mental activity (concepts, judgments, conclusions). For example, the word tree expresses the concept of one of the plant species. And in the sentence the green tree expresses the idea of ​​the presence of a certain feature (green) in a certain object (tree). Thus, the sentence expresses a qualitatively different result of a person's cognitive work - in comparison with the result that is expressed in a single word.

But words, their combinations and whole statements not only express concepts and thoughts: they participate in the very process of thinking, with their help thoughts arise, form, and therefore become a fact of a person’s inner life. IP Pavlov substantiated the materialistic position that human thoughts cannot exist and develop outside of speech. The "second signaling system" (language) is involved in the formation of thought. That is why psychologists talk about the perfection of thought in the word.

LANGUAGE AS A MEANS OF HUMAN COMMUNICATION.

The world is full of wonders. Isn't it a miracle that we can talk to people who are in another city, and at the same time see them? Or to observe from the Earth what is happening in the spacecraft? Or watch sports games in the other hemisphere? Is it just this? But among the various miracles, we somehow do not pay attention to one of the most amazing - our native language.

Human language is an amazing, unique miracle. Well, what would we, people, cost without language? It is simply impossible to imagine us as speechless. After all, it was language that helped us stand out from the animals. Scientists have known this for a long time. “The scattered peoples gather in hostels, build cities, build temples and ships, take up arms against the enemy and other necessary, allied forces that require work to do, as if it were possible if they had no way to communicate their thoughts to each other.” This was written by M. V. Lomonosov in the middle of the 17th century in his “Short Guide to Eloquence”. Two of the most important features of the language, more precisely, two of its functions, were indicated here by Lomonosov: the function of communication between people and the function of shaping thoughts.

Language is defined as a means of human communication. This one of the possible definitions of language is the main one, because it characterizes the language not from the point of view of its organization, structure, etc., but from the point of view of what it is intended for. But why is it important? Are there other means of communication? Yes, there are. An engineer can communicate with a colleague without knowing his native language, but they will understand each other if they use blueprints. Drawing is usually defined as the international language of engineering. The musician conveys his feelings with the help of a melody, and the listeners understand him. The artist thinks in images and expresses it with lines and colors. And all these are “languages”, so often they say “the language of the poster”, “the language of music”. But that's another meaning of the word. language.

Let's take a look at the modern four-volume Dictionary of the Russian Language. It contains 8 meanings of the word language, among them:

1. Organ in the oral cavity.

2. This human organ, involved in the formation of speech sounds and thus in the verbal reproduction of thoughts; organ of speech.

3. A system of verbal expression of thoughts, which has a certain sound and grammatical structure and serves as a means of communication between people .

4. A type of speech that has certain characteristic features; style, style.

5. A means of wordless communication.

6. Obsolete People.

The fifth meaning refers to the language of music, the language of flowers, etc.

And the sixth, obsolete, means people. As you can see, the most important ethnographic feature is taken to define the people - its language. Remember, Pushkin:

The rumor about me will spread throughout the great Russia,

And every language that is in it will call me,

And the proud grandson of the Slavs, and the Finn, and now wild

Tungus, and a Kalmyk friend of the steppes.

But all these "languages" do not replace the main thing - the verbal language of a person. And Lomonosov wrote about this at one time: “True, besides our word, it would be possible to depict thoughts through different movements of the eyes, face, hands and other parts of the body, somehow pantomimes are presented in theaters, but in this way it would be impossible to speak without light , and other human exercises, especially the work of our hands, were a great insanity for such a conversation.

Indeed, we have now become convinced that with the help of the "movement of body parts" it is possible, for example, to tell "Anna Karenina" by L. N. Tolstoy. We enjoy watching a ballet on this topic, but only those who have read the novel understand it. It is impossible to reveal the rich content of Tolstoy's work in the ballet. The language of words cannot be replaced by any other.

Thus, language is the most important means of communication. What qualities must he possess to become just that?

First of all, everyone who speaks the language must know the language. There is, as it were, some general agreement that the table will be called the word table, and running is a word run. It is impossible to decide now how it happened, because the paths are very different. For example, here is the word satellite in our time has acquired a new meaning - "a device launched with the help of rocket devices." The date of birth of this value can be indicated absolutely exactly - October 4, 1957, when the radio announced the launch in our country of the first artificial satellite of the Earth. "This word immediately became known in this sense and entered into the everyday life of all the peoples of the world.

Here is the "agreement" for you. Everything is simple here, although such a meaning itself was already prepared by the Russian language: in the XI-XIII centuries it had the meaning of “comrade on the road” and “accompanying in life”, then - “satellite of the planets”. And from here it is not far to a new meaning - "a device accompanying the Earth."

But often not all words are known to speakers of a given language. And then normal communication is disrupted. Most of all, this is connected with foreign words. But misunderstanding can also be associated with original Russian words, known only in a certain territory, or with words that are rarely used, outdated.

But if there are a lot of similar words, it makes it difficult to read the text. Therefore, critics oppose such a heap of dialectisms. This is what the satirists laugh at.

Difficult communication and professional words, known only to people of this profession. However, professional vocabulary is a very important part of the vocabulary of the language. It contributes to a more accurate and fruitful communication of people of a certain profession, which is extremely necessary. The larger and more accurate the dictionary, the more detailed it allows you to talk about the processes, the higher the quality of the work.

The clarity of the language provides his role in organizing people. Born as a product of collective labor, the language is still called upon to unite people in labor activity, in the field of culture, etc.

The second quality on which communication depends is that the language should cover everything that surrounds a person, including his inner world. This, however, does not mean at all that the language should exactly repeat the structure of the world. We really have "words for every essence," as A. Tvardovsky said. But even that which does not have a one-word name can be successfully expressed by combinations of words.

It is much more important that the same concept in the language can have, and very often has, several names. Moreover, it is believed that the richer such rows of words - synonyms, the richer the language is recognized. This shows an important point; language reflects the external world, but is not absolutely adequate to it.

Here, for example, is the color spectrum. There are several primary colors of the spectrum. It now relies on precise physical indicators. As you know, light of different wavelengths excites different color sensations. It is difficult to separate exactly “by eye”, for example, red and purple, which is why we usually combine them into one color - red. And how many words are there for this color: red, scarlet, crimson, bloody, rye, red, ruby, pomegranate, red, Also, you could add - cherry, raspberry etc.! Try to distinguish between these words according to the length of light waves. It will fail, because they are filled with their own special shades of significance.

The fact that the language does not blindly copy the surrounding reality, but somehow in its own way, highlighting something more, attaching less importance to something, is one of the amazing and far from fully explored mysteries.

The two most important functions of the language that we have considered do not exhaust all its advantages and features. Some will be discussed next. And now let's think about how, on what grounds we can evaluate a person. Of course, you will say, there are many reasons for this: his appearance, attitude towards other people, towards work, etc. All this, of course, is true. But language also helps us to characterize a person.

They say: they meet by clothes, see off by mind. How do you know about the mind? Of course, from the speech of a person, from how and what he says. His dictionary characterizes a person, that is, how many words he knows - little or a lot. So, the writers I. Ilf and E. Petrov, having decided to create the image of the primitive bourgeois Ellochka Shchukina, first of all, spoke about her dictionary: “William Shakespeare's dictionary, according to researchers, is twelve thousand words. The vocabulary of a negro from the cannibalistic tribe of Mumbo Yumbo is three hundred words. Ellochka Shchukina easily and freely managed thirty ... ”The image of Ellochka the Cannibal became a symbol of an extremely primitive person and one sign contributed to this - her language.


How many words does the average person know? Scientists believe that the vocabulary of an ordinary person, i.e. who does not specialize in the language (not a writer, linguist, literary critic, journalist, etc.) is about five thousand. And against this background, the quantitative indicator of the genius of outstanding people looks very expressive. The Dictionary of Pushkin's Language, compiled by scientists on the basis of Pushkin's texts, contains 21,290 words.

Thus, language can be defined as a means of knowing the human person, as well as a means of knowing the people as a whole.

Here it is - the miracle of the language! But that's not all. Each national language is also a pantry of the people who speak it, and its memory.


LANGUAGE IS THE TREASURY OF THE PEOPLE, ITS MEMORY.

When a historian seeks to restore and describe the events of the distant past, he turns to various sources available to him, which are objects of that time, eyewitness accounts (if they are recorded), oral folk art. But among these sources there is one most reliable - the language. The well-known historian of the last century, Professor L. K-Kotlyarevsky noted: "Language is the surest, and sometimes the only witness to the past life of the people."

The words and their meanings reflect and have survived to this day the echoes of very distant times, the facts of the life of our distant ancestors, the conditions of their work and relations, the struggle for freedom and independence, etc.

Let's take a specific example. Before us is a series of words, seemingly unremarkable, but connected by a common meaning: share, fate, destiny, happiness, luck. Academician B. A. Rybakov analyzes them in his work “Paganism of the Ancient Slavs”: “This group of words can even go back to the hunting era, to the division of prey between hunters who divided the prey, gave each a corresponding share, part, giving something to women and children - “happiness” was the right to participate in this division and receive their share (part). Here everything is quite concrete, "weighty, rude, visible."

These words could retain exactly the same meaning in an agricultural society with a primitive collective economy: share and part meant the share of the total harvest that fell on this family. But in the conditions of agriculture, the old words could acquire a new dual-opposite meaning: when the highway of the primitive zadrugi distributed work among the plowmen and divided the arable land into plots, then one could get a good "lot", and the other - a bad one. Under these conditions, the words required a qualitative definition: "good lot" (plot), "bad lot". It was here that the birth of abstract concepts took place ... "

This is what the historian saw in our modern words. It turns out that they contain the deepest memory of the past. And another similar example.

In one of his works, N. G. Chernyshevsky noted: “The composition of the lexicon corresponds to the knowledge of the people, testifies ... about its everyday activities and lifestyle, and partly about its relations with other peoples.”

Indeed, the language of each era contains the knowledge of the people in this era. Follow the meaning of the word atom in different dictionaries of different times, and you will see the process of comprehending the structure of the atom: first - "further indivisible", then - "split". At the same time, the dictionaries of past years serve as reference books for us about the life of those times, about the attitude of people to the world and the environment. It is not for nothing that V. I. Dahl’s Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language is considered an “encyclopedia of Russian life”. In this amazing dictionary we find information about beliefs and superstitions, about the life of people.

And this is not an accident. If you try to reveal the content of the word, then you will inevitably have to touch on the phenomena of life that words designate. Thus, we have come to the second sign, called by N. G. Chernyshevsky "everyday activities and way of life." The everyday activities of the Russian people are reflected in numerous words that directly name these activities, for example: beekeeping - extracting honey from wild bees, tar farming - forcing tar out of wood, carting - winter transportation of goods by peasants when there was no work in agriculture, etc. The words kvass, cabbage soup (shti), pancakes, porridge and many others reflect Russian folk cuisine; the monetary units of the long-standing monetary systems are reflected in the words grosh, altyn, dime. It should be noted that metric, monetary and some other systems, as a rule, were expressed by different peoples in their own words, and this is exactly what constitutes the national characteristics of the vocabulary of the national language.

Relations between people, moral commandments, as well as customs and rituals were reflected in the stable combinations of the Russian language. M. A. Sholokhov in the preface to the collection of V. I. Dahl “Proverbs of the Russian people” wrote: “The variety of human relations, which are imprinted in chased folk sayings and aphorisms, is boundless. From the abyss of time, in these clumps of reason and knowledge of life, human joy and suffering, laughter and tears, love and anger, faith and unbelief, truth and falsehood, honesty and deceit, diligence and laziness, the beauty of truths and the ugliness of prejudices have come down to us.

The third provision, noted by N. G. Chernyshevsky, is also important - “relationships with other peoples”. These relationships were not always good. Here and the invasion of enemy hordes, and peaceful trade relations. As a rule, the Russian language borrowed from other languages ​​only what was good in them. The statement of A. S. Pushkin is curious in this regard: “... An alien language was spread not by a saber and fires, but by its own abundance and superiority. What new concepts that required new words could be brought to us by a nomadic tribe of barbarians who had neither literature, nor trade, nor legislation? Their invasion left no traces in the language of the educated Chinese, and our ancestors, groaning under the Tatar yoke for two centuries, prayed to the Russian god in their native language, cursed the formidable rulers and passed on their lamentations to each other. Be that as it may, hardly fifty Tatar words passed into the Russian language.

Indeed, the language as the basis of the nation was preserved very carefully. An excellent example of how people value their language can serve as the Cossacks - Nekrasov. The descendants of the participants in the Bulavin uprising, who suffered religious persecution in Russia, left for Turkey. They lived there for two or three centuries, but kept the language, customs and rituals pure. Only concepts new to them were borrowed in the form of words from the Turkish language. The original language has been completely preserved.

The formation of the Russian language took place in difficult conditions: there was a secular language - Old Russian, and Church Slavonic, in which services were conducted in churches, spiritual literature was printed. A. S. Pushkin wrote; “Have we become convinced that the Slavic language is not the Russian language, and that we cannot mix them willfully, that if many words, many phrases can be happily borrowed from church books, then it does not follow from this that we can write and lobzhet kiss me instead of kissing me."

And yet, the role of borrowing as a result of communication between peoples cannot be discounted. Borrowings were the result of important events. One of these events was the baptism in Russia in the X-XI centuries and the adoption of Christianity of the Byzantine model. Of course, this should have been reflected in the language. I. was reflected. Let's start with the fact that books were needed that would set forth church canons. Such books appeared, they were translated from Greek. But in the church, the service was in the Old Slavonic language (aka Church Slavonic). Therefore, translations were made into Old Church Slavonic.

And the people in Russia spoke the secular - Old Russian language. It was used both for chronicles and for other literature. The existence of two languages ​​in parallel could not but affect the influence of Old Church Slavonic on Old Russian. That is why we have preserved many Old Slavonic words in modern Russian.

And the further history of our country can be traced by outbreaks of foreign borrowings. Peter I began to carry out his reforms, build a fleet - Dutch, German words appeared in the language. The Russian aristocracy showed interest in France - French borrowings invaded. They came mainly not from the war with the French, but from cultural ties.

It is curious that all the best was borrowed from each nation. What, for example, did we borrow from French? These are words related to cuisine (famous French cuisine), fashion, clothing, theater, ballet. The Germans borrowed technical and military words, the Italians borrowed musical and kitchen words.

However, the Russian language has not lost its national specificity. The poet Y. Smelyakov said very well about this:

... You, our great-grandfathers, are in short supply,

Having powdered the face with flour,

grinded at the Russian mill

visiting Tatar language.

You took a little German

even though they could do more

so that they don't get it alone

the scientific importance of the earth.

You, who smelled of rotten sheepskin

and grandfather's sharp kvass,

written with a black torch,

And a white swan feather.

You are above prices and rates -

in the forty-first year, then,

wrote in a German dungeon

on weak lime with a nail.

Lords and those disappeared,

instantly and surely

when accidentally encroached

to the Russian essence of the language.

And it is also worth recalling here the words of Academician V. V. Vinogradov: “The power and greatness of the Russian language are indisputable evidence of the great vitality of the Russian people, its original and high national culture and its great and glorious historical destiny.”

HOW LANGUAGE IS BUILT.

A language can successfully fulfill its main purpose (i.e., serve as a means of communication) because it is "composed" of a huge number of different units linked to each other by linguistic laws. This fact is what they mean when they say that the language has a special structure (structure). Learning the structure of language helps people improve their speech.

In order to present the linguistic structure in the most general terms, let us think about the content and construction of a single phrase, for example, this: (Pushkin). This phrase (statement) expresses a certain, more or less independent meaning and is perceived by the speaker and the listener (reader) as an integral unit of speech. But does this mean that it is not divided into smaller segments, parts? No, of course it doesn't. Such segments, parts of a whole statement, we can detect very easily. However, not all of them are the same in their characteristics. To see this, let's try to isolate, to begin with, the smallest sound segments of our utterance. To do this, we will divide it into parts until there is nothing more to divide. What will happen? Get vowels and consonants:

D-l-a b-i-r-e-g-o-f a-t-h-i-z-n-s d-a-l-n-o-th T-s p-a-k -i-d-a-l-a k-r-a-y h-u-zh-o-d.

This is how our statement looks like if it is divided into separate sounds (the literal representation of these sounds is not very accurate here, because the sound of speech cannot be accurately conveyed by ordinary means of writing). Thus, we can say that the sound of speech is one of those linguistic units that in their totality form the language, its structure. But, of course, this is not the only unit of the language.

Let us ask ourselves: what are speech sounds used in language for? The answer to this question is not immediately found. But still, apparently, one can notice that the sound shells of words are built from the sounds of speech: after all, there is not a single word that would not be composed of sounds. Further, it turns out that the sounds of speech have the ability to distinguish the meanings of words, that is, they reveal some, albeit very fragile, connection with the meaning. Let's take some words: house - ladies - gave - small - ball - was - howl - ox. How does each subsequent word in this series differ from its predecessor? Just a change in sound. But this is enough for us to perceive the words of our series as different from each other and in meaning. Therefore, in linguistics it is customary to say that speech sounds are used to distinguish between the meanings of words and their grammatical modifications (forms). If two different words are pronounced the same way, that is, their sound shells are composed of the same sounds, then such words do not differ from us, and in order for us to perceive their semantic differences, these words must be connected with other words, t i.e. substitute in the statement. These are the words braid"tool" and braid(girlish) key"spring" and key(lock), start(hours) and start(puppy). These and similar words are called homonyms.

The sounds of speech are used to distinguish between the meanings of words, but in themselves they are insignificant: neither the sound a, nor the sound y, nor the sound same, nor any other separate sound in the language are connected with any specific meaning. As part of a word, sounds jointly express its meaning, but not directly, but through other units of the language, called morphemes. Morphemes are the smallest semantic parts of a language used to form words and to change them (these are prefixes, suffixes, endings, roots). Our statement is divided into morphemes as follows:

For the shores of the otch-izn-s far-n-oh You are a kid-a-l-a foreign land.

Sound, speech is not connected, as we have seen, with any definite meaning. The morpheme is significant: with each root, suffix, ending, with each prefix, this or that meaning is associated in the language. Therefore, we must call the morpheme the smallest structural and semantic unit of the language. How to justify such a complex term? This can be done: the morpheme is indeed the smallest semantic unit of the language, it participates in the construction of words, is a particle of the structure of the language.

Having recognized the morpheme as the semantic unit of the language, we should not, however, lose sight of the fact that this unit of the language is devoid of independence: outside the word, it has no specific meaning, it is impossible to build an utterance from morphemes. Only by comparing a number of words that are similar in meaning and sound, we find that the morpheme turns out to be the bearer of a certain meaning. For example, the suffix -nick in the words hunter-nick, season-nick, carpenter-nick, balalaika player, eysot-nick, defender-nick, worker-nick has the same meaning - informs about the figure, the character; the prefix po- in the words ran, no-played, sat, no-read, sighed, no-thought informs about the shortness and limitation of the action.

So, the sounds of speech only distinguish the meaning, while morphemes express it: each individual sound of speech is not associated in the language with any specific meaning, each individual morpheme is connected, although this connection is found only in the composition of a whole word (or a series of words), which and forces us to recognize the morpheme as a dependent semantic and structural unit of the language.

Let's go back to saying For the shores of the homeland, you left the land of a stranger. We have already identified two kinds of linguistic units in it: the shortest sound units, or speech sounds, and the shortest structural-semantic units, or morphemes. Does it have units larger than morphemes? Of course there is. These are well-known (at least in their name) words. If a morpheme, as a rule, is built from a combination of sounds, then a word, as a rule, is formed from a combination of morphemes. Does this mean that the difference between a word and a morpheme is purely quantitative? Far from it. After all, there are such words that contain a single morpheme: you, cinema, only what, how, where. Then - and this is the main thing! - the word has a definite and independent meaning, while the morpheme, as already mentioned, is not independent in its meaning. The main difference between a word and a morpheme is created not by the amount of "sounding matter", but by the quality, ability or inability of a linguistic unit to independently express a certain content. The word, due to its independence, is directly involved in the construction of sentences, which are divided into words. The word is the shortest independent structural and semantic unit of the language.

The role of words in speech is very great: our thoughts, experiences, feelings are expressed by words, combined statements. The semantic independence of words is explained by the fact that each of them denotes a certain “object”, a phenomenon of life and expresses a certain concept. Tree, city, cloud, blue, lively, honest, sing, think, believe - behind each of these sounds are objects, their properties, actions and phenomena, each of these words expresses a concept, a "piece" of thought. However, the meaning of the word is not reducible to the concept. The meaning reflects not only the objects themselves, things, qualities, properties, actions and states, but also our attitude towards them. In addition, the meaning of a word usually reflects various semantic connections of this word with other words. Having heard the word native, we will perceive not only the concept, but also the feeling coloring it; in our minds there will arise, albeit very weakened, ideas about other meanings historically associated in Russian with this word. These ideas will be different for different people, and the very word native will cause some differences in its understanding and evaluation. One, having heard this word, will think of his relatives, the other - of his beloved, the third - of friends, the fourth - of the Motherland ...

This means that both sound units (speech sounds) and semantic units, but not independent ones (morphemes), are needed, after all, in order for words to arise - these are the shortest independent carriers of a certain meaning, these smallest parts of statements.

All words of a particular language are called its vocabulary (from the Greek lexis "word") or vocabulary. The development of language unites words and separates them. On the basis of their historical association, various vocabulary groups are formed. These groups cannot be “lined up” in one row for the reason that they are distinguished in the language on the basis of not one, but several different features. So, in the language there are vocabulary groups formed as a result of the interaction of languages. For example, in the vocabulary of the modern Russian literary language there are many words of foreign origin - French, German, Italian, Ancient Greek, Latin, Old Bulgarian and others.

By the way, there is a very good manual for mastering foreign vocabulary - "Dictionary of Foreign Words".

There are vocabulary groups of a completely different nature in the language, for example, active and passive words, synonyms and antonyms, local and general literary words, terms and non-terms.

It is curious that among the most active words in our language are the unions and, a; prepositions in, on; pronouns he, I, you; nouns year, day, eye, hand, time; adjectives big, different, new, good, young; verbs to be, to be able, to speak, to know, to go; adverbs very, now, now, it is possible, good, etc. Such words are the most common in speech, that is, they are most often needed by speakers and writers.

Now we will be interested in a new, important question in the study of the structure of language: it turns out that by themselves, individual words, no matter how active they are in our speech, cannot express coherent thoughts - judgments and conclusions. But people need such a means of communication that could express coherent thoughts. This means that the language must have some kind of “device”, with the help of which words could be combined to build statements that can convey a person’s thought.

Let's return to the sentence For the shores of the homeland, you left the land of a stranger. Let us take a closer look at what happens to words when they are included in the composition of an utterance. We can relatively easily notice that the same word can change not only its appearance, but also its grammatical form, and hence its grammatical features and characteristics. So, the word coast is put in our sentence in the form of the genitive plural; the word fatherland - in the form of the genitive case of the singular; the word distant is also in the form of the genitive case of the singular; the word you appeared in its "initial" form; the word leave “adapted” to the word you and the expressed meaning and received signs of the past tense, singular, feminine; the word edge has signs of the accusative case of the singular; the word alien is endowed with the same signs of case and number and received the masculine form, since the word edge “requires” from the adjective precisely this generic form.

Thus, by observing the "behavior" of words in various utterances, we can establish some schemes (or rules) according to which words naturally change their form and are associated with each other to build utterances. These schemes of the regular alternation of grammatical forms of the word in the construction of statements are studied at school: the declension of nouns, adjectives, conjugation of verbs, etc.

But we know that declension, conjugation, and various rules for linking words into sentences and constructing sentences are no longer vocabulary, but something else, what is called the grammatical structure of the language, or its grammar. It is not necessary to think that grammar is some set of information about the language compiled by scientists. No, grammar is, first of all, the schemes, rules (regularities) inherent in the language itself, to which the change in the grammatical form of words and the construction of sentences are subject.

However, the concept of "grammar" cannot be clearly explained if the question of the duality of the very nature of the word is not, at least schematically, incompletely considered: for example, the word spring is an element of the vocabulary of the language and it is also an element of the grammar of the language. What does it mean?

This means that each word, in addition to individual features inherent only to it, also has common features that are the same for large groups of words. The words window, sky and tree, for example, are different words, and each of them has its own special sound and meaning. However, they all have features that are common to them: they all designate an object in the broadest sense of this term, they all belong to the so-called neuter gender, they can all change in cases and numbers and will receive the same endings. And now, with its individual features, each word is included in the vocabulary, and with its general features, the same word is included in the grammatical structure of the language.

All the words of the language, coinciding in their common features, form one large group, called the part of speech. Each part of speech has its own grammatical properties. For example, the verb differs from the name of the numeral both in meaning (the verb denotes an action, the numeral denotes a quantity), and in formal signs (the verb changes according to moods, tenses, persons, numbers, genders - in the past tense and the subjunctive mood; all verb forms have a voice and specific characteristics; and the numeral changes according to cases, genera - only three numerals have forms of the genus: two, one and a half, both). Parts of speech refer to the morphology of the language, which, in turn, is an integral part of its grammatical structure. In morphology, the word enters, as already mentioned, with its common features, namely: 1) its general meanings, which are called grammatical; 2) their common formal signs - endings, less often - suffixes, prefixes, etc.; 3) general patterns (rules) of its change.

Let's take a look at these words. Do the words have common, grammatical meanings? Of course: to walk, to think, to speak, to write, to meet, to love - these are words with a general meaning of action; walked, thought, spoke, wrote, met, loved - here the same words reveal two more common meanings: they indicate that actions were performed in the past, and that they were performed by one person "male"; below, in the distance, in front, above - these words have the general meaning of a sign of certain actions. It is enough to look at the verbs just given to make sure that the words also have common formal signs: in the indefinite form, the verbs of the Russian language usually end with the suffix -т, in the past tense they have the suffix -l, when they change in the present tense, they get the same endings, etc. Adverbs also have a peculiar common formal sign: they do not change.

It is also easy to see that words have general patterns (rules) for their change. Forms read - read - will read do not differ, if we keep in mind the general rules for changing words, from the forms I play - I played - I will play, I meet - I met - I will meet, I know - I knew - I will know. At the same time, it is important that grammatical changes in a word affect not only its “shell”, its external form, but also its general meaning: read, play, meet, know denote an action carried out by one person at 1 moment of speech; read, played, met, knew indicate an action carried out by one person in the past; a I will read, I will play, I will meet, I will know express concepts of actions that will be carried out by one person after the moment of speech, that is, in the future. If the word does not change, then this sign - immutability - turns out to be common to many words, that is, grammatical (recall adverbs).

Finally, the morphological "nature" of a word is revealed in its ability to enter into relations of dominance or subordination with other words in a sentence, to require the addition of a dependent word in the required case form, or to assume one or another case form itself. So, nouns easily obey verbs and just as easily obey adjectives: read (what?) A book, book (what?) New. Adjectives, being subordinate to nouns, can hardly enter into connection with verbs, comparatively rarely subordinate nouns and adverbs to themselves. Words belonging to different parts of speech are involved in the construction of a phrase in different ways, that is, a combination of two significant words related by the method of subordination. But, speaking of word combinations, we move from the area of ​​morphology to the area of ​​syntax, to the area of ​​sentence construction. So, what have we been able to establish by looking at how the language works? Its structure includes the shortest sound units - the sounds of speech, as well as the shortest non-independent structural and semantic units - morphemes. A particularly prominent place in the structure of the language is occupied by words - the shortest independent semantic units that can participate in the construction of a sentence. Words reveal the duality (and even trinity) of their linguistic nature: they are the most important units of the vocabulary of the language, they are components of a special mechanism that creates new words, word formation, they are also units of the grammatical structure, in particular morphology, language. The morphology of a language is a set of parts of speech in which common grammatical meanings of words, common formal signs of these meanings, common compatibility properties and general patterns (rules) of change are revealed.

But morphology is one of the two components of the grammatical structure of a language. The second part is called the syntax of the language. Having met this term, we begin to remember what it is. In our minds, not very clear ideas about simple and complex sentences, about composing and subordinating, about coordinating, managing and adhering, emerge. Let's try to make these representations more distinct.

Once again, we call on our proposal for help. For the shores of a distant homeland, you left a foreign land, In its composition, phrases are easily distinguished: For the shores (what? Whose?) of the homeland (what?) Far away did you leave (what?) The land (what? Whose?) Alien. In each of the four marked phrases there are two words - one main, dominant, the other - subordinate, dependent. But none of the phrases individually, nor all of them together, could express a coherent thought if there were not a special pair of words in the sentence that constitutes the grammatical center of the utterance. This couple: you left. This is the subject and predicate known to us. Combining them with each other gives a new, most important from the point of view of expressing thought, a unit of language - a sentence. The word in the composition of the sentence acquires temporarily new signs for it: it can become completely independent, dominating is the subject; a word can express such a sign that will tell us about the existence of an object indicated by the subject - this is a predicate. A word in a sentence can act as an addition, in which case it will denote an object and will be in a position dependent on another word. Etc.

The members of a sentence are the same words and their combinations, but included in the statement and expressing different relationships to each other based on its content. In different sentences, we will find the same members of the sentence, because parts of statements that are different in meaning can be connected by the same relations. The sun illuminated the earth and boy read a book- these are very far from each other statements, if we keep in mind their specific meaning. But at the same time, these are the same statements, if we keep in mind their general, grammatical features, semantic and formal. The sun and the boy alike designate an independent object, illuminated and read alike indicate such signs that tell us about the existence of an object; the earth and the book equally express the concept of the subject to which the action is directed and extended.

The sentence, by its specific meaning, is not included in the syntax of the language. The specific meaning of the sentence is included in various areas of human knowledge about the world, therefore it interests science, journalism, literature, it interests people in the process of work and life, but linguistics is cold to it. Why? Simply because the specific content is, after all, those very thoughts, feelings, experiences, for the expression of which both the language as a whole and its most important unit, the sentence, exist.

The sentence enters the syntax with its general meaning, general, grammatical features: the meanings of narrative interrogation, motivation, etc., general formal signs (intonation, word order, conjunctions and allied words, etc.), general patterns (rules) of its construction.

The whole infinite set of already created and newly created statements on grammatical grounds can be reduced to relatively few types of sentences. They differ depending on the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative and incentive) and on the structure (simple and complex - compound and complex). Sentences of one type (say, narrative) differ from sentences of another type (say, incentives) both in their grammatical meanings, and in their formal signs (means), for example, intonation, and, of course, in the laws of their construction.

Therefore, we can say that the syntax of a language is a collection of different types of sentences, each having its own common grammatical meanings, common formal signs, general patterns (rules) of its construction, necessary to express a specific meaning.

Thus, what in science is called the structure of a language turns out to be a very complex “mechanism”, consisting of many different component “parts”, connected into a single whole according to certain rules and jointly performing a large and important work for people. The success or failure of this "work" in each case depends not on the linguistic "mechanism", but on the people who use it, on their ability or inability, willingness or unwillingness to use its powerful force.

ROLE OF LANGUAGE.

The language was created and is developing because the need for communication constantly accompanies the work and life of people, and its satisfaction is necessary. Therefore, language, being a means of communication, has been and remains a constant ally and helper of a person in his work, in his life.

The labor activity of people, no matter how complex or simple it may be, is carried out with the obligatory participation of the language. Even in automated factories run by a few workers and where the need for language seems to be small, it is still needed. Indeed, in order to establish and maintain the smooth operation of such an enterprise, it is necessary to build perfect mechanisms and train people capable of managing them. But for this you need to acquire knowledge, technical experience, you need a deep and intense work of thought. And it is clear that neither the mastery of work experience, nor the work of thought is possible without the use of a language that allows you to read, books, listen to lectures, talk, exchange advice, etc.

The role of language in the development of science, fiction, educational activities of society is even more obvious, more accessible for understanding. It is impossible to develop science without relying on what it has already achieved, without expressing and consolidating the work of thought in words. The bad language of writings, in which certain scientific results are presented, very noticeably complicates the mastery of science. No less obvious is the fact that serious shortcomings in speech, through which the achievements of science are popularized, can erect a "Chinese wall" between the author of a scientific work and its readers.

The development of fiction is inextricably linked with language, which, according to M. Gorky, is the "primary element" of literature. The fuller and deeper the writer reflects life in his works, the more perfect their language should be. This simple truth is often forgotten by writers. M. Gorky was able to convincingly remind her in time: “The main material of literature is the word, which forms all our impressions, feelings, thoughts. Literature is the art of plastic representation through the word. The classics teach us that the more simply, clearly, clearly the semantic and figurative content of the word, the more firmly, truthfully and steadily the image of the landscape and its influence on a person, the image of a person’s character and his relationship to people.

The role of language in agitation and propaganda work is also very noticeable. To improve the language of our newspapers, radio broadcasts, television programs, our lectures and conversations on political and scientific topics is a very important task. Indeed, back in 1906, V. I. Lenin wrote that we should “be able to speak simply and clearly, in a language accessible to the masses, decisively throwing away the heavy artillery of tricky terms, foreign words, memorized, ready, but still incomprehensible to the masses, unfamiliar her slogans, definitions, conclusions. Now the tasks of propaganda and agitation have become more complex. The political and cultural level of our readers and listeners has risen, therefore the content and form of our propaganda and agitation must be deeper, more varied and more effective.

It is difficult even approximately to imagine how unique and significant the role of language in the work of the school. The teacher will not be able to give a good lesson, communicate knowledge to children, interest them, discipline their will and mind, if he speaks inaccurately, inconsistently, dryly and stereotyped. But language is not only a means of transferring knowledge from teacher to student: it is also a tool for acquiring knowledge, which the student constantly uses. K. D. Ushinsky said that the native word is the basis of all mental development and the treasury of all knowledge. The student needs a good command of the language in order to acquire knowledge, quickly and correctly understand the word of the teacher, the book. The level of speech culture of a student directly affects his academic performance.

Native speech, skillfully applied, is an excellent tool for educating the younger generation. Language connects a person with his native people, strengthens and develops a sense of the Motherland. According to Ushinsky, “the language spiritualizes the whole nation and its entire homeland”, it “reflects not only the nature of the native country, but the whole history of the spiritual life of the people ... Language is the most lively, most abundant and strong bond connecting the obsolete, living and future generations of the people into one great, historical living whole. It not only expresses the vitality of the people, but is precisely this very life.

TREASURE LANGUAGES.

Writers are always on the lookout. They are looking for new, fresh words: it seems to them that ordinary words can no longer evoke the desired feelings in the reader. But where to look? Of course, first of all, in the speech of the common people. The classics were aimed at this.

N. V. Gogol: “... Our extraordinary language is still a mystery ... it is boundless and can, living like life, enrich itself every minute, drawing, on the one hand, lofty words from the language of the Church-Biblical, and on the other hand, choosing apt names to choose from from countless of their dialects, scattered throughout our provinces.

The appeal of writers to colloquial folk speech, to dialects - this is a reliable way to develop vocabulary. How happy the writer is when he finds a well-aimed, figurative word, as if rediscovered for himself!

A. N. Tolstoy once remarked: “The language of the people is unusually rich, much richer than ours. True, there is not a whole series of words, phrases, but the manner of expression, the richness of shades is greater than ours. The writer compares the literary Russian language (“we have”) and the “folk language”. But we agreed that there are two varieties of this "folk language". However, here's the thing. Actually, dialect vocabulary does not allow people to communicate only with its help: it serves as an addition to the main vocabulary fund, to well-known words. It's like a local "seasoning" to the well-known vocabulary.

However, folk dialects as a source of replenishment of the language are being questioned today. Young people living in different areas, under the influence of the media - radio, television - forget local words, are embarrassed to use them in speech. Is it good or bad?

This question is of interest not only to us Russian people. The concern about this is expressed by the American writer John Steinbeck in his book Traveling with Charlie in Search of America: “The language of radio and television takes on standard forms, and we probably never speak so cleanly and correctly. Our speech will soon become the same everywhere, like our bread... Following the local accent, the local rates of speech will also die. Idioms and figurativeness will disappear from the language, which enrich it so much and, testifying to the time and place of their origin, give it such poetry. And in return we will get a national language, packaged and packaged, standard and tasteless.

Sad prediction, isn't it? However, we must remember that scientists are not asleep. A collection of dialect material was carried out in various localities, and regional dictionaries of local dialects were created. And now work is underway to publish issues of the Dictionary of Russian Folk Dialects, more than 20 books of which have already gone out of print. This is a wonderful pantry that both writers and scientists will look into, a pantry that can be used in the future. This dictionary summarizes the work of all regional dictionaries, the existence of each word with its individual meanings will be indicated.

Our classical writers dreamed of such a dictionary of the “folk language”. “And really, it would not be bad to take up the lexicon, or at least criticize the lexicon!” - exclaimed A. S. Pushkin.

N.V. Gogol even began work on “Materials for a Dictionary of the Russian Language”, moreover, on a dictionary of the “folk language”, because dictionaries of the literary language were already being created by the Russian Academy. Gogol wrote: “For many years, studying the Russian language, marveling more and more at the accuracy and intelligence of its words, I became more and more convinced of the essential need for such an explanatory dictionary, which would expose, so to speak, the face of the Russian word in its direct meaning, illuminate would have it, would have shown more tangibly its dignity, so often unnoticed, and would have revealed in part its very origin.

To a certain extent, the Dictionary of V. I. Dahl solved this problem, but it did not satisfy the needs of writers either.


LANGUAGE IN ACTION - SPEECH.

Usually they say not “language culture”, but “speech culture”. In special linguistic works, the terms "language" and "speech" are in great use. What is meant when the words "language" and "speech" are consciously distinguished by scientists?

In the science of language, the term “speech” refers to language in action, i.e., language used to express specific thoughts, feelings, moods and experiences.

Language is the property of all. He has the means necessary and sufficient to express any specific content - from the naive thoughts of a child to the most complex philosophical generalizations and artistic images. The norms of the language are national. However, the use of language is very individual. Each person, expressing his thoughts and feelings, chooses from the entire stock of language means only those that he can find and that are needed in each individual case of communication. Each person must combine the means selected from the language into a coherent whole - into a statement, a text.

The possibilities that various means of language have are realized, carried out in speech. The introduction of the term "speech" recognizes the obvious fact that the general (language) and the particular (speech) in the system of means of communication are one and at the same time different. We are accustomed to call the means of communication, taken in abstraction from any specific content, language, and the same means of communication in connection with a specific content - speech. The general (language) is expressed and implemented in the particular (in speech). Private (speech) is one of many specific forms of the general (language).

It is clear that language and speech cannot be opposed to each other, but we must not forget about their difference. When we speak or write, we perform a certain physiological work: the “second signaling system” is operating, therefore, certain physiological processes are carried out in the cerebral cortex of the cerebral hemispheres, new and new neuro-brain connections are established, the speech apparatus works, etc. What is the product of this activity? Just those same statements, texts that have an inner side, i.e. meaning, and an external side, i.e. speech.

The role of an individual in the formation of speech is very significant, although far from unlimited. Since speech is built from the units of the language, and the language is nationwide. The role of an individual in the development of a language, as a rule, is negligible: the language changes in the process of speech communication of the people.

Such definitions as “correct”, “incorrect”, “accurate”, “inaccurate”, “simple”, “heavy”, “light”, etc. are inapplicable to the language of the people. But these same definitions are quite applicable to speech. In speech, more or less compliance with the norms of the national language of a certain era is manifested. In speech, deviations from these norms and even distortions and violations of them may be allowed. Therefore, it is impossible to talk about the culture of the language in the usual sense of these words, but it is possible and necessary to talk about the culture of speech.

Language in grammars, dictionaries, scientific literature is usually described in abstraction from specific content. Speech is studied in its relation to one or another specific content. And one of the most important problems of speech culture is the most appropriate selection of language means in accordance with the expressed content, goals and conditions of communication.

Distinguishing the terms "language" and "speech", we will have to establish differences between the terms "language style" and "speech style". In comparison with the styles of the language (they were discussed above), the styles of speech are its typical varieties, depending on the style of the language used, and on the conditions and goals of communication, and on the genre of the work, and on the attitude of the author of the statement to the language; styles of speech differ from each other in the peculiarities of the use of linguistic material in certain specific verbal works.

But what does it mean - attitude to the language? This means that not all people equally know their native language, its styles. This means, furthermore, that not all people evaluate the meaning of words in the same way, that not everyone approaches words with the same aesthetic and moral requirements. This means, finally, that not all people are equally “sensitive” to those subtle semantic nuances that words and their combinations reveal in specific utterances. Due to all these reasons, different people select linguistic material in different ways and organize this material in different ways within the limits of a speech work. In addition, speech styles also reflect differences in people's attitudes towards the world and man, their tastes, habits and inclinations, their thinking skills and other circumstances that do not relate to the facts and phenomena studied by the science of language.


CONCLUSION .

The struggle for a culture of speech, for a correct, accessible and vivid language is an urgent social task, which is realized especially clearly in the light of the Marxist understanding of language. After all, the language, working, constantly participates in the activity of consciousness, expresses this activity, actively influences it. Hence - the colossal power of the influence of the word on thoughts, feelings, moods, desires, people's behavior ...

We need constant protection of the word from corruption and distortion, it is necessary to declare war on the distortion of the Russian language, the war that V. I. Lenin spoke about. We still too often hear sloppy (and sometimes simply illiterate), “something” speech. There are people who do not know well and do not appreciate our public wealth - the Russian language. So there is from whom and from what to protect this property. We badly need everyday, smart, demanding defense of Russian speech - its correctness, accessibility, purity, expressiveness, effectiveness. You need a clear understanding that "a word can kill a person and bring him back to life." It is unacceptable to look at the word as something of a minor importance in people's lives: it is one of human affairs.

LIST OF USED LITERATURE:

1. Leontiev A.A. What is language. Moscow: Pedagogy - 1976.

2. Grekov V.F. and other Handbook for classes in the Russian language. M., Education, 1968.

3. Oganesyan S.S. Culture of speech communication / Russian language at school. No. 5 - 1998.

4. Skvortsov L.I. Language, communication and culture / Russian language at school. No. 1 - 1994.

5. Formanovskaya N.I. Culture of communication and speech etiquette / Russian language at school. No. 5 - 1993.

6. Golovin B.N. How to speak correctly / Notes on the culture of Russian speech. Moscow: Higher school - 1988.

7. Gvozdarev Yu.A. Language is the confession of the people ... M .: Education - 1993.

Russian language and culture of speech: a course of lectures Trofimova Galina Konstantinovna

Lecture 2 Language as a means of communication. Conditions for effective communication

Language as a means of communication. Conditions for effective communication

1. Features of speech communication.

2. Types of communication. communication types.

3. Principles of successful communication.

4. Use of effective speech tactics in communication.

As already noted, one of the functions of language is the function of communication. “Language is what carries and provides a common world orientation. Communication is by no means a mutual delimitation ... a conversation is not two monologues flowing next to each other. No, in conversation the common field of the speaker is cultivated” (G.-G. Gadamer. Actuality of the beautiful. M., 1991, pp. 43–60).

- Katya, I have an exam in physics tomorrow. Give me, please, questions or better your lectures.

- Mash, you know, I went to such a concert yesterday!

– I am learning this physics... Do you know which textbook is better?

- Simply fantastic! Our students spoke.

“So you don’t have lectures?” Then I'll go to the library.

Masha, where are you? We talked so well...

Communication, i.e. communication (lat. I make common, I connect) is a specific form of interaction between people in the process of their cognitive and labor activity. The main goal of verbal communication is the exchange of information of various kinds, its awareness and understanding. In addition, in the process of contact, mutual influence and empathy are carried out. Communication can be aimed at fulfilling a socially significant task, at business and at meeting personal needs.

The main functions of communication: informative, interactive (incentive), perceptual (establishment of mutual understanding), expressive (excitement of emotional experiences).

Without communication, the formation of personality is impossible, any kind of activity is practically impossible. Communication in modern conditions is the basis for the success of every person. 63% of English, 73% of American, 85% of Japanese executives identify communication as the main condition for the success of their firms, and the executives themselves spend 50% to 90% of their time on it.

The means of transmitting information in communication are divided into verbal and non-verbal. Verbal ones are carried out with the help of words - language, non-verbal ones - with the help of signs and symbols: gestures, facial expressions, posture, gaze, distance.

Language is realized in speech. Speech is an external manifestation of language, that is, it refers to verbal means of communication. Speech plays an extremely important role in human communication and labor activity.

One of the thinkers said: “Take away from me everything that I have, but leave me my speech. And soon I will have everything I had.

The most important function of speech as an activity is the function of expressing thought. To think means to operate with concepts, therefore it is necessary to know the words denoting these concepts, therefore mastering language means is mastering the richness of the language, a necessary condition for the development of human thinking and his communication.

Speech activity consists of several successive phases: orientation, planning, implementation, control or response. The beginning of a speech utterance is a speech situation, that is, a combination of circumstances that prompt a person to act: answer a question, greeting, make a phone call. The speech situation dictates the rules for conducting a conversation and determines the forms of its expression. For example, at a doctor's appointment, at a test, at a seminar, in a conversation with a friend or with a leader, different constructions and models of speech behavior are used.

In the implementation of speech action, the following stages are distinguished:

- preparation, when there is an awareness of goals, motives, needs and a forecast of results is carried out;

- structuring the statement (the choice of words, their design is carried out);

- transition to external speech.

Speech perception (the process of listening or reading) includes understanding (language and content), feedback (reaction).

The English writer Lord Chesterfield wrote to his son: “I often had to see how the fate of a person was decided once and for all by the first words he uttered in society. If it is pleasant to hear them, people, against their will, are immediately imbued with the conviction that this person has virtues.

Being an act of communication, speech is always addressed to someone. The model of speech communication is as follows: addresser - message - addressee. The addressee and addressee are called communicants. The following qualities are very important for communicators:

- empathy - the ability to see the world through the eyes of other people, to understand another person;

- benevolence - the ability not only to sympathize, but also to show one's benevolent attitude, respect and sympathy for other people;

- the ability to understand the interlocutor even when you do not approve of his act;

- readiness to support another person;

- authenticity - the ability to be natural, not hiding behind masks and roles, the ability to be yourself;

- specificity, rejection of general reasoning, the ability to talk about specific experiences, the willingness to unambiguously answer questions;

- initiative - a tendency to an active active position, as well as the ability to establish contacts on their own initiative;

immediacy - the ability to speak and act directly;

- openness - a willingness to open one's inner world to others, a firm conviction that openness contributes to the establishment of strong relationships with others;

- acceptance of feelings - readiness to accept emotional experiences from the partner;

- readiness in case of dissimilarity of opinions to go to the confrontation, but not for the purpose of intimidation, but with the hope of establishing honest relations.

To simplify the tasks of communicants, certain laws have been created that make communication more successful. There are two descriptions of the principles of communication. They bear their names after the names of the founders - the principle of cooperation G.P. Grice and the politeness principle of J. N. Leach. These principles form the basis of the communicative code, the most important criteria of which are the criterion of truth (fidelity to reality) and the criterion of sincerity (fidelity to oneself). They contribute to the creation of an atmosphere of openness and trust between the participants in communication, which makes it possible to establish contacts and mutual understanding, more accurately convey information and avoid conflicts.

Grice's principle of cooperation consists of four maxims:

- the maxim of completeness of information (the statement should not contain more information than required, and less than required);

- the maxim of the quality of information (do not say what you consider false);

- maxim of relevance (do not deviate from the topic);

- maxim of manners (speak clearly, concisely, be organized). Leach's Civility Principle consists of six maxims:

- the maxim of tact, the maxim of the boundaries of the personal sphere (you cannot touch on topics such as religion, private life, salary, etc.);

- maxim of generosity, non-burdening of the interlocutor;

- maxim of approval, positivity;

- the maxim of modesty, rejection of praise addressed to oneself, realistic self-esteem;

- the maxim of consent involves the rejection of conflict in order to maintain communication and to solve problems;

- maxim of sympathy, benevolence.

Of course, a measure should be observed in everything so that these principles do not come into conflict with each other and do not create situations, as in I. Krylov's fable "Demyanova's Ear" or in the novel by N.V. Gogol's Dead Souls" when Manilov and Chichikov could not part at the door.

The nature of the speech action is judged by the reaction to it, the response, i.e., by feedback. Feedback is an indicator of the effectiveness of communication, the achievement of the desired result. Feedback can be transmitted by facial expressions, gestures, glances, compliments.

The quality of understanding a message depends on the various conditions under which the communication takes place. The combination of these conditions is called the context. The general context is made up of the obvious and the secret. Explicit is to be observed. Hidden includes goals, motives, characteristics of communication. In addition to the context, there is a subtext, the implicit meaning of speech, realized in the context of communication. There are three types of subtext: real (was and was perceived), imaginary (was not, but was attributed), hidden (was, but was not noticed).

Signs of subtext can be hidden in the content of speech, in the nature of its sound, in non-verbal characteristics of behavior.

– Why did you miss the lecture again, Petrov?

- I overslept...

Do you still sleep at home?

Here the subtext is hidden in the content, as in the poster on the road: “Slow down. We don’t have a hospital,” and in a common situation, when a third person approaches two people who are talking, and they, after looking at each other, fall silent or disperse, the subtext is hidden in non-verbal characteristics.

Depending on the goals of communication in everyday life and the professional sphere, the following types of communication are distinguished:

- contact of masks - formal communication, usually due to a set of ritual phrases, gestures that hide the true face and true intentions;

- primitive communication, when an object is evaluated in terms of its usefulness or lack of it;

- formal-role communication, when social roles are defined - teacher - student;

- business communication, which takes into account the individual characteristics of the individual, but for the interest of the case;

- spiritual communication of friends;

- manipulative communication aimed at extracting benefits;

- secular communication, absolutely formal, when they say what is supposed to be said in a similar situation.

Depending on the speech characteristics in communication, the following types are distinguished:

- dominant type - seeks to take control of the situation, does not like to be interrupted, speaks loudly. In a conversation with him, it is not recommended to seize the initiative, interrupt. After waiting for a pause, you need to clearly and quickly formulate your questions;

- a mobile interlocutor - easily enters into a conversation, does not experience difficulties, talks a lot, jumping from topic to topic. Therefore, it must be returned to the topic of conversation, not to allow introductions and abstract conversations;

- a rigid interlocutor - has difficulty entering into communication. When this first stage is passed, he articulates his thoughts clearly. You must first talk to him, talk with him on an abstract topic, that is, you need an introduction;

- an introverted interlocutor does not seek to take the initiative, is modest, harsh phrases get him out of a rut, the presence of strangers fetters. It should be supported, showing respect and understanding, not interrupted.

Knowing the characteristics of the interlocutor makes it easier to achieve success in communication. Knowing your own characteristics helps to change the situation in a speech situation or choose the right interlocutor, the right communication option, the area of ​​business interests. For example, friends decided to prepare a practical task together or went on vacation together. But communication did not work out, quarrels began, work and rest did not work out. Why? Maybe because two dominants came together closely and no one wants to give in. If one of them moves towards rigidity, communication will flow more easily. Or experts say that introverts are rarely good leaders, which means they must work on themselves and speech towards rigidity.

Each communication situation uses its own speech tactics, that is, speech techniques that help achieve the goal. Experts identify speech tactics inherent in everyday and business communication. Common are:

- generalization (when unfavorable information is supported by words that this happens);

- an example (... and they bought it for my friend ..., and I at your age ..., i.e., some specific experience is used);

– surprise (use of unexpected information);

- a moment of informality (a story about your mistakes in order to show an approach to solving a problem);

- the Socratic method of answering “yes” to the questions asked and leading to the final “yes” (You went to the exhibition on Saturday and said that you liked it (“Yes”), besides, it took a little time (“Yes”) and the ticket was inexpensive (“Yes”), so you can go with me to this exhibition again (“Yes”);

- provocation (expressing one's disagreement in order to understand the opponent's position);

- "lubrication" of the argument ("you, as a smart person, of course, will understand this situation"), etc.

Everyone knows cases when interlocutors, no matter how hard they try, do not understand each other. The reasons lie in the unequal knowledge of the subject of conversation, the psychological characteristics of the interlocutors, professional, political, religious differences, that is, in communication barriers.

1. logical barrier. Each person sees the problem from their own perspective. You need to try to understand the interlocutor, to stand on his point of view.

2. stylistic barrier. It assumes a clear structure of the text, logic and sequence of presentation. For this, the frame and chain rule is used. The frame rule is that the beginning and end of the message should be clearly delineated, since the beginning and end are better remembered. The chain rule assumes the structure of the text, built on some basis. And, of course, the type of message is taken into account, since the form of communication and its content must correspond to each other. If this is not the case, there is a style barrier.

3. Semantic (semantic) barrier arises when the interlocutors use different vocabulary, different culture of conversation, i.e. they “speak different languages”, have social, religious, professional differences.

In any field of activity and in everyday life, each person has to face not only misunderstanding, but also enter into conflict (Latin clash) - a clash of parties with opposite goals, interests, views. Allocate social and intrapersonal conflicts, constructive and destructive, family, labor, social, etc.

Conflicts, as a rule, develop according to one scheme and have three stages: pre-conflict, open and post-conflict.

Pre-conflict is characterized by the awareness of the conflict by its participants and the desire to resolve it in non-conflict ways (conversation, request, persuasion, etc.).

The open period begins with an incident, then the conflict grows: the emotional tension of the participants increases, new forces and new information are involved, the parties resort to personal attacks and claims, aggressive actions are used, the initial subject of disagreement is forgotten. When the parties understand that the tactics used do not give a result, their attitude changes and the end of the conflict begins in one of the forms: resolution, extinction or escalation into another conflict.

The post-conflict period is overcoming negative emotional assessments, establishing relationships or cooperation.

In the book by D.G. Scott "Methods of conflict resolution" describes the strategies of behavior in a conflict situation.

Rivalry(competition) - a strategy of open struggle, imposing one's point of view to the detriment of the interests of the other side. This option is used when it seems that the solution you propose is the best, when you have no other choice and nothing to lose, when you need to make a quick decision and you have enough authority. The danger is that the conflict will escalate.

Cooperation - it is a search for a solution that will be acceptable to all parties. This style requires self-control, respect for each other. It is used when there is time for reflection and decision-making, when the parties have equal power and equally seek solutions to problems, when the parties are ready to listen to each other and provide the necessary information.

Compromise - settlement of disagreements through mutual concessions, i.e. the parties partially fulfill their desires, partially the desires of the other party. Compromise is good when you can change the original goal, both parties have the same power and mutually exclusive interests.

Avoidance(evasion) - the ability to get out of a conflict situation without solving it, without yielding and without insisting on one's own. It is usually used when the issue is not very important in order to collect the necessary information or to avoid communicating with a conflicting person. It is used when it is necessary to reduce the intensity of the relationship, when you have little power, when the conflict will bring additional trouble, when it takes time to get the right information or additional support.

Fixture - smoothing out contradictions at the expense of their own interests. Whereas in an avoidance strategy the other side's problems are simply discarded, in an accommodation you agree to work with the other side. Used when it is necessary to maintain peaceful relations, when the truth is on the other side, when you have little chance.

The effectiveness of interaction at the household or business level is determined not only by how the speech action is understood, but also by the ability to read visual information. The inner world of a person and the language of his body and gestures are interconnected.

N.F. Koshansky, the author of a textbook on rhetoric, wrote: “The language of action is the desire of the soul, which is revealed in the movement of the body. The language of action is stronger and more striking. Verbal language is more definite and precise. The language of action is equally understandable at all times, to all people: it is taught by nature itself.

The means of non-verbal communication include, as a rule, the following: gesture, posture, gaze, facial expression, distance.

Psychologists believe that in the process of communication, 55% of the information about what a person is, we receive through non-verbal signals. Almost a million non-verbal signals have been studied. Only with the help of hands a person can transmit 700,000 signals. Chekhov has a story built on the change of non-verbal signals, "Thick and thin", and L.N. Tolstoy described 97 smile shades and 85 eye expressions.

Different peoples use non-verbal language in their own way. For example, the Italians use gestures 80 times within an hour, the French - 20, the Finns - 1-2 times.

Sign language, on the one hand, is international, on the other hand, each nation has its own gestures, keeps its distance when communicating. Everything that a person cannot convey in words, he conveys through gestures, facial expressions, and glances. Non-verbal signals show how a person knows how to control himself, as well as what people really think about us.

For example, the leader, when greeting, gives his hand with the palm down, and the soft person with the palm up. Clenched hands behind the back indicate confidence and superiority. In a stressful situation, for example, before an exam, it is recommended to make such a gesture so that fear disappears. Arms crossed on the chest - evidence of closeness, a desire to avoid trouble. A teacher at a lecture, stretching his hand forward, requires attention and is ready for dialogue with the audience. A nod of the head means approval, permission to continue. People who cross their legs during a conversation require increased attention, as they are ready for rivalry, confrontation. A woman sitting cross-legged and shaking her leg is obviously bored. The conversation partner sitting on the edge of the chair is action oriented, such as leaving or signing a contract. When a person joins his fingers into a dome, he is confident in himself, what he is talking about is confidence. Self-control gesture - hands are brought together behind the back, and there one hand strongly squeezes the other hand. Hands on the chest are a sign of openness and honesty. Active gestures reflect often positive emotions and are understood as a sign of friendliness. Excessive gestures betray anxiety, self-doubt, and can serve as a sign of aggressiveness. For example, psychologists draw the attention of the seller: if the buyer's eyes look down, and he turns his face to the side, then the purchase will not take place. If he sincerely smiles, his chin is pushed forward - he is considering the proposal. If he lowers his head a little and smiles slightly, the purchase will be made.

Interpersonal space is also an important factor in communication. Researchers have identified four areas of communication:

- the intimate zone (from 15 to 50 cm) is a zone of close emotional contact (children, relatives);

- interpersonal distance (from 50 to 1.2 m) - communication of friends;

- social zone (from 1.2 to 3.7 m) - this distance is maintained with strangers, for informal and business relations;

- public area (more than 3.6 m) - when communicating with a large audience.

Responding to non-verbal communication, a person involuntarily copies the postures, gestures of the speaker, as if saying: "Go on, I'm listening", thereby encouraging further communication or, on the contrary, showing that communication will not take place.

So, in order for communication to be effective, it is necessary to remember the principles of communication, “see” the interlocutor, study his non-verbal signals, and avoid speech barriers.

1. How to make communication effective?

2. You and your interlocutor: elements of behavior, speech tactics.

APPENDIX

Test "Your level of sociability"

Answer "Yes" - 2 points, answer "No" - 0 points, answer "Sometimes" - 1 point.

1. Do you feel unsettled waiting for a business meeting?

2. Do you feel embarrassed or dissatisfied with the order to make a report, message, information at a conference, meeting, meeting?

3. Do you put off going to the doctor until it becomes unbearable?

4. You are offered to go on a business trip to a city where you have never been. Will you make every effort to avoid this business trip?

5. Do you like to share your experiences with anyone?

6. Do you get annoyed if a stranger on the street asks you to show you the way (check the time, etc.)?

7. Do you believe that there is a problem of "fathers and sons" and it is difficult for people of different generations to understand each other?

8. Will you keep silent if you are served an obviously poor-quality dish in a cafe?

9. Once alone with a stranger, will you not enter into a conversation with him and will you be burdened if he speaks first?

10. Any long queue terrifies you. Do you prefer to give up the intention to buy goods (tickets) or stand in the tail and languish in anticipation?

11. Are you embarrassed to remind a friend that he forgot to pay you back the money he borrowed a few months ago?

12. Are you afraid to participate in the commission to review any conflict situations?

13. You have your own, purely individual criteria for evaluating works of art and you do not accept any other people's opinions on this matter. Is it so?

14. Do you prefer to remain silent and not enter into an argument when you hear somewhere on the sidelines an obviously erroneous point of view on a matter well known to you?

15. Do you get frustrated when someone asks you to help me understand a particular topic of study?

16. Are you more willing to express your point of view in writing than orally?

32 - 30 points. You are clearly uncommunicative. Try to be more sociable.

29–25 points. You are closed, taciturn, love loneliness. New work and new contacts throw you off balance. Knowing this, you are unhappy with yourself and can change the situation.

24–19 points. You feel confident in an unfamiliar situation. But you are reluctant to meet new people.

18-14 points. You have good communication skills. You willingly listen to the interlocutor, are patient in communication, calmly defend your point of view, but do not like noisy companies and verbose people.

13 - 9 points. You are sociable, curious, talkative, love to be the center of attention. Feel free to speak up and meet new people. But you do not have enough patience in fulfilling your obligations, perseverance when faced with serious problems.

8–4 points. You have a great desire to communicate. You are up to date. You take on any case, participate in disputes, not knowing the essence and not bringing the matter to the end. Therefore, you may be treated with distrust.

3 - 0 points. Your communication skills are painful.

You are talkative, intervene in matters that are not related to you, become the cause of conflicts, you are quick-tempered and biased. It's difficult with you. and this needs to be thought about.

From the book Essays, articles, reviews author Moskvina Tatyana Vladimirovna

COLD AS A REMEDY FROM DAMAGE "Nevskoe Vremya" No. 210, 02.11.1996. Tatyana MOSKVINA see also. P. Azbelev's answer in the same newspaper to this article

From the book Culturology: Lecture Notes author Enikeeva Dilnara

LECTURE No. 5. The language of culture and its functions 1. The concept of the language of culture The language of culture in the broadest sense of this concept refers to those means, signs, forms, symbols, texts that allow people to communicate with each other. The language of culture is the universal

From the book Communicative Culture. From communicative competence to social responsibility author author unknown

1.2. Communicative competence: language and speech as a means of communication and as a way of thinking In the cultural-historical theory, language is considered as a means of communication between people, and speech is considered as a way of the subject's mental activity. In the practice of schooling

From the book Japan: Language and Culture author Alpatov Vladimir Mikhailovich

From the book Psycholinguistics author Frumkina Revekka Markovna

From the book Civilization of Ancient Rome author Grimal Pierre

Chapter 6 LIFESTYLE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARTS The Latin language, a means of civilization. - Literature of representation: theater and rhetoric. - Literature for expressing feelings: history and poetry - Literature after Augustus: Ovid, Persius, Lucan. - Seneca and the imperial heritage. -

From the book Language and Man [On the Problem of the Motivation of the Language System] author Shelyakin Mikhail Alekseevich

3.1. The concept of human communication (verbal communication) and its functions Human communication is a process of interaction and interconnection of people, in which they mutually adapt to each other in their behavior by transmitting and understanding information about a particular

From the book Russian language and culture of speech: a course of lectures author Trofimova Galina Konstantinovna

Section 1 Language as a means of communication

From the book France and the French. What guidebooks are silent about by Clark Stefan

Lecture 1 The great language of the great people Plan1. Objectives and content of the subject.2. Language as a sign system.3. The history of the development of the Russian national language.4. Language is the guardian of the spiritual wealth of the nation.5. Russian language is the language of interethnic communication, international status

From the book Culture and Peace author Team of authors

Lecture 1 Literary language is the basis of speech culture. Functional styles, areas of their application Plan1. The concept of speech culture.2. Forms of existence of the national language. Literary language, its features and properties.3. Non-literary varieties of language.4. Functional

From the book How to Speak Correctly: Notes on the Culture of Russian Speech author Golovin Boris Nikolaevich

Lecture 2 Genres of oral business communication Plan1. Business conversation, its structural and linguistic features.2. Phone conversation.3. Business meeting. Negotiations and presentations. Business communication is always pragmatic, subject to the solution of any task (personal,

From the book Individual and Society in the Medieval West author Gurevich Aron Yakovlevich

Lecture 3 Features of written speech in business communication. Types of documents, their design, language and style Plan1. Document norms (text and language).2. Speech etiquette of the document.3. Language and style of private documents.4. Language and style of service documentation.Currently

From the author's book

From the author's book

I. V. Vlasova. Tolerance as a prerequisite for effective communication

From the author's book

THE MOST IMPORTANT MEANS OF COMMUNICATION In ancient Greece and Rome, the culture of the native word was already developing. The ancient world brought up wonderful poets, writers, playwrights - masters of artistic speech. This world has given stories of outstanding speakers who raised and decided important issues.

From the author's book

3. The language of bureaucracy and the language of autobiography Opicin appears in many respects as a unique and stand-alone personality. He was in the service of the papal court in Avignon, but there is no record of any of his human connections. It's his social loneliness

Means of communication are methods of coding, transformation and decoding of information transmitted in the course of communication interaction. Communication means are divided into two large blocks: speech and non-speech blocks, i.e. verbal and non-verbal means of communication. Speech is a process of exploiting language for the purpose of communication interactions between individuals. Language is a sign system, the main function of which is to ensure communication between people, thinking, a method of expressing the self-consciousness of an individual. Speech as a method of verbal communication acts simultaneously as a source of information and a method of influencing communication partners.

The means of communication include, first of all, language, intonations of speech and emotional expressiveness, facial expressions and gestures, postures.

Language as a means of communication between individuals is closely interconnected with society, its culture and individuals who live and work in it, while using the language in a diverse and extensive way.

Communication or communication is the transmission from one individual to another of any information with a different purpose. Communication is a consequence of the communicative interaction of two or more persons in specific circumstances and in the presence of a universal means of communication.

Language is the main means of human communication. The purpose of a language to be a mechanism for communication is called its communicative function. Interacting with each other, individuals broadcast their own thoughts, worldviews, emotions and emotional unrest, mutually influence each other in a certain direction, and reach a common understanding. With the help of language, the subjects of interpersonal interaction understand each other. It enables them to establish collective work in all areas of human activity. Language is the force that determines the existence and development of individuals and society as a whole. And the communicative function is the leading social function of the language. However, it is far from its only function. Its specialized functions include cognitive, expressive, nominative and accumulative.

The ability to express information, broadcast it and influence the interlocutor is called the expressive function of the language. This function is considered as a unity of expression and translation of data, feelings and emotional experiences, the will of the speaker.

Cognitive function is interconnected with the presence of human consciousness in linguistic signs. Language is a kind of tool of consciousness, reflecting the results of a person's cognitive activity. Linguistic bickering about what comes first, mental activity or language, will probably never stop. The only true judgment is the assertion that language has an inseparable connection with thinking, since humanity not only expresses its own thoughts in words, but also thoughts are formulated in the form of words - a person thinks in words. The cognitive function of the psyche is intended to fix the consequences of mental activity and apply them in communication. This function contributes to the knowledge of the world and its verbalization.

A person thinks with the help of categories, and in the course of cognition, she discovers and names new phenomena and concepts for herself, which is the nominative function of language. It has a close connection with the cognitive, since everything known must necessarily have its own name. It also has a connection with the ability of linguistic signs to give designation to things. It is this ability that allows the individual to create a world of symbols. However, in the modern world there are many things that do not have names.

The accumulative function is closely related to the collection and storage of information. After all, it is no secret to anyone that language has existed much longer than people and people. A vivid example of this is the dead languages ​​that outlived their speakers. Language, whether it exists today or not, keeps the memory of generations and the centuries-old history of mankind. After all, even with the loss of oral speech, one can master the ancient writings and draw certain conclusions about the past life of the nation.

Language is also spoken and written. The leading form of the language is its sound component. Unwritten languages ​​may also exist. When there is only written fixation, and there is no voicing, then the language becomes dead.

Non-verbal means of communication

Our body language, compared to other verbal (speech) means of communication, is unique. If we imagine that it is he who carries from 60 to 80 percent of the information transmitted to the interlocutor, it is easy to understand the need to interpret this method of contact. If we want to be sure that we understand a person accurately, we must combine information from the body and verbal expressions into one big picture.

Which of us has not encountered a feeling of vague anxiety when communicating with a person when he claimed one thing, but subconsciously you felt his falsity. You will say that this is intuition and good for those who have it. In fact, it is easy to develop intuition by observing the interlocutor and, knowing the specific meaning of gestures, draw the right conclusions.

An example of non-verbal communication

An experiment was conducted in a psychology class at a university. The audience, which consisted of married couples, was divided into two groups by gender and allowed to watch videos of various types of crying babies. Then they were asked to explain their meaning. Most women who have had children accurately deciphered them (hunger, wet diapers, pain, etc.), while men did not see much difference in the options for crying. This led to the conclusion that women, being more sensitive and observant, are easier to interpret non-verbal gestures. It is more difficult for men to do this, they need specifics, and not all sorts of sentimental experiences. Of course, there are also exceptions.

This case also explains why it is difficult for the stronger sex to tell a lie to his wife, who seems to read the real state of affairs in her eyes.

So, consider non-verbal means of communication.

To clearly understand their diverse structure, we present their classification:

1. Expressive movements (body posture, facial expressions, gestures, gait).
2. Tactile movements (handshake, patting on the back or shoulder, touching, kissing).
3. Visual-contact gaze (direction of gaze, its duration, frequency of contact).
4. Spatial movements (orientation, distance, placement at the table).

In this part of the article, we will dwell on the first two groups of means of non-verbal communication and try to characterize their meaning. It should be remembered that to interpret a single gesture without a combination of other body signals means to mislead oneself. Therefore, before drawing specific conclusions, it is necessary to take into account all the nuances of the behavior of the interlocutor, as well as his physical and psychological state.

openness

The hands of the interlocutor are turned palms up and widely spread to the sides. The head is straight, the shoulders are straight. The look is straight. Facial expression is natural, without tension and stiffness. This posture of friendliness, as a means of non-verbal communication, speaks of openness, sincerity. She is also spoken about by a handshake with a grasp of her with two of her hands. Men can unbutton their shirt or jacket while talking. Communicating with such a person, you involuntarily relax and feel trust in him.

Sympathy

In non-verbal communication, there is the concept of mental contact, which is expressed in involuntary copying of each other's gestures or the entire behavior. A signal is sent to each other: "I understand you perfectly." And indeed, if you take a look at the peacefully talking couple at the table, we will see similar poses, the same arrangement of hands up to the mirror. If you want to convince another person of unconditional sharing of his opinion, just copy his body position.

If we observe the gait of a happy man in love, we note the flying gait, which is very striking. It is also characteristic of self-confident, energetic people. It seems that they do not care about all the problems.

Deception

Have you seen how someone hides their hands in a conversation? It is likely that he is telling a lie, since the human brain subconsciously sends signals to the body and when a lie is told, there is a strong desire to put his hands in his pocket, scratch his nose, rub his eyes. All these are typical signs to explain the meaning of non-verbal gestures in the aggregate. A person suffering from a runny nose can scratch his nose, rub his eyes - a child who has just woken up, etc.

Defense

Arms crossed on the chest, legs crossed in standing and sitting positions - a classic gesture of closeness, inaccessibility. Frequent blinking is a sign of protection, confusion. The emotional status of a person does not allow you to feel free and at ease. If you try to negotiate something with such an interlocutor, it is likely that you will be refused.

Concentration

It is expressed in tingling of the bridge of the nose with closed eyes. When the person with whom you communicate decides what to do or what to do, in general thinks about solving a certain issue, at this time he can rub his chin.

criticality

If a person holds his hand at his chin, with his index finger stretched along his cheek, and with the other hand he supports his elbow, his left eyebrow is lowered - you will understand that he has matured a negative assessment of what is happening.

Positivity

It is interpreted as a slight tilt of the head forward and a slight touch of the cheek with the hand. The body is tilted forward. Here is a person who is interested in what is happening, positively related to information.

Mistrust

You probably noticed how some students, listening to the speaker, cover their mouths with their palms? This gesture indicates disagreement with the lecturer's opinion. They seem to hold back their statements, suppress true feelings and experiences. If your friend suddenly makes a gesture of disbelief in a conversation, stop and think about what words caused such a reaction from him? Observing the behavior of the boss, the subordinate will understand what needs to be said, and what is better to remain silent. Distrust quickly turns into rejection, and then into rejection.

Uncertainty

A non-verbal gesture such as scratching or rubbing the back of the ear or neck may indicate that the person does not fully understand what they want from him or what you mean in a conversation. How to interpret such a gesture if you were told about full understanding? Here, preference should be given to the non-verbal signal of the body. In this case, the person did not understand anything. The hand clasping the other behind the elbow also speaks of uncertainty, probably its owner is in an unfamiliar society.

Boredom

The interlocutor props up his head with his hand. It is clear that he is indifferent to what is happening. If he is sitting in the audience, we can say with confidence: the material presented by the lecturer is completely uninteresting.

Disapproval

Shaking off non-existent hairs, straightening the folds of clothes, tugging at the skirt in non-verbal communication is a sign of your opponent's disagreement with the stated point of view. You will quickly realize the need to switch to neutral topics. However, if a thread really sticks to the sleeve of the jacket, the clothes are wrinkled, you should not regard this as a gesture of disapproval.

Willingness to leave

Can be identified by signs such as drooping of the eyelids (loss of interest), scratching the ear (fencing off the flow of speech), sipping the earlobe (does not want to speak out), turning the whole body towards the door or pointing the foot in this direction. The gesture in the form of removing glasses also gives a signal to end the conversation.

Irritation

When a person tells a blatant lie and realizes that you have seen through him, he will experience irritation from your rightness, which may manifest itself in an involuntary loosening of a tie or collar. In non-verbal communication, this can also manifest itself in rubbing the neck, unnecessary hand movements, pinching a lady's handbag, mechanical drawing on paper.

Superiority

The so-called "director's pose" or "boss pose" in a sitting position. Hands lie behind the head, one foot on the other. If the eyelids are barely closed or the corners of the eyes are slightly squinted, the gaze is directed downward - you have arrogance, neglect. This position of the body as a means of non-verbal communication is often taken by bosses, people in leadership positions. They are self-confident, demonstratively express their importance to others. An attempt to copy this gesture threatens with an early dismissal from work.

Equality

A similar gesture is used by almost all men, women are much less. The nature of the handshake can say a lot, first of all, it will reveal the intentions of the other person. If at the moment of connecting two hands one is higher with the back side, its owner demonstrates his leading position. You can check how firmly he defends his status as a leader in a simple way: turn his hand up. If you feel resistance, then you will not be able to convince him to take equality between you.

Sexual gestures

When a man likes a woman, he shows thumbs in his belt, puts his hands on his hips, or spreads his legs wide. Gazing at a woman is usually intimate, and can linger on selected parts of the body for a long time. A man can involuntarily straighten his tie or collar with his hand.

If a woman seeks to interest, she unconsciously tosses her head, straightens her hair, straightens her blouse. A more subtle art of seduction through non-verbal communication consists of exposing the wrists, spreading the legs in a sitting or standing position. If a woman demonstrates an intimate look in combination with an accidentally slipped shoulder strap, half-dressed shoes on a crossed leg, be sure that she wants to start flirting. A parted mouth and wet lips are typical of sexual appeal.

Tactile movements

These include hugs, handshakes, pats on the shoulder or back, touching, kissing.

Embrace

By the nature of the hugs, their strength, duration, they determine the meaning of the feelings expressed by a person.

Bosom friends, who were in a long separation, at the meeting almost strangle each other in a strong embrace. Lovers linger in gentle embrace for a long time. Hugs between distant relatives, depending on previously maintained contacts, can be both restrained, cold, and ardent. Between close people, they have a soft sincere meaning. In wrestling matches, for example, the competitors briefly hug and part ways.

Such a means of non-verbal communication as hugs is more common among representatives of the strong half of humanity, between women they are a little less common. Now you can see two teenage girls on the streets running towards each other with open arms. At this age, the frequency of such contacts, both between boys and girls, is expressive, when you want to throw out an excess of joy, delight and admiration for the meeting. If you see same-sex couples walking slowly down the sidewalk in an intertwined embrace, it can unwittingly suggest homosexuality.

Handshakes

Handshakes, as one of the means of non-verbal communication, also differ in the way they are performed, strength and duration. A strong, energetic shaking of the interlocutor's hand, coupled with a joyful exclamation, speaks of the sincerity of the partner, his desire to continue the conversation. The girth of one's hand in the form of a "glove" also speaks of friendliness. But if an inanimate hand is extended to you, like a dead fish, they do not want to contact you.

A cold hand in a shake can signal that its owner is either cold or very worried. Sweaty palms speak of a nervous experience. A hand shaking palm down indicates a desire to dominate another person. If, on the contrary, it is turned palm up, its owner unconsciously recognizes himself as a subordinate to the interlocutor.

Patting on the back or shoulder

Patting on the back or shoulder is mostly characteristic of men. These non-verbal gestures are often interpreted as a sign of friendship, concern, or encouragement. They can be seen in almost all age categories. Patting, as it were, demonstrates masculine strength and the readiness of its owner to come to the rescue.

By the way, this gesture should not be confused with that used in medical practice. A newborn child is slapped on the back to make him scream and expand his lungs, a choking person is slapped from behind. Patting is a type of technique in massage practice. That is, the specific meaning of this gesture depends on the current situation.

touch

Touch is widely used in the world of non-verbal communication. In educational activities, it helps to stop a naughty naughty person, in the case of a deaf person, to attract his attention, in medical practice, with the help of this gesture, a state of health is diagnosed, the massage technique is built on a combination of methods of touching the body, in the intimate sphere between spouses they serve as a prelude to the connection. Different types of touch are an indicator of the partner's unexpressed feelings. They can be gentle, affectionate, light, strong, rough, hurting, etc.

kisses

Kissing, as a kind of tactile gesture, is widely used in all aspects of human life. In relation to a specific object, the nature of kisses changes. The mother kisses the child tenderly and with love, between loving people they can vary from a light touch of the lips to a passionate kiss. Here we note that kisses can be both sincere manifestations of feelings, and formal, cold, traditional. Kiss at a meeting and goodbye, kiss at the time of birth.

Verbal means of communication

Verbal communication is the process of exchanging information between people (or groups of people) using speech means. Simply put, verbal communication is communication through words, speech.

Of course, in addition to the transmission of specific “dry” information, during verbal communication, people interact with each other emotionally and influence each other, conveying their feelings and emotions in words.

In addition to verbal, non-verbal communication is also distinguished (transmission of information without words, through facial expressions, gestures, pantomime). But this distinction is conditional. In practice, verbal and non-verbal communication are directly related to each other.

Body language always complements, “illustrates” speech. Pronouncing a certain set of words and trying to convey some idea to the interlocutor through them, a person speaks with a certain intonation, facial expression, gesticulating, changing posture, and so on, that is, helping himself in every possible way and supplementing speech with non-verbal means of communication.

Despite the fact that speech is a universal, rich and expressive means of information exchange, very little information is transmitted through it - less than 35%! Of these, only 7% are directly related to words, the rest is intonation, tone and other sound means. More than 65% of information is transmitted using non-verbal means of communication!

The priority of non-verbal means of communication is explained by psychologists by the fact that the non-verbal communication channel is simpler, evolutionarily older, spontaneous and difficult to control (after all, non-verbal is unconscious). And speech is the result of the work of consciousness. A person realizes the meaning of his words during their pronunciation. Before you say something, you can always (and should) think, but controlling your facial expression or a spontaneous gesture is an order of magnitude harder.

In personal, emotional-sensory communication, non-verbal means of communication predominate (are more priority and important). In business interaction, the ability to correctly, clearly, clearly convey one’s ideas verbally is more important, that is, the ability to competently build one’s monologue, conduct a dialogue, understand and correctly interpret, first of all, the speech of another person.

The ability to competently express yourself, your personality through speech is very important in a business environment. Self-presentation, interviews, long-term cooperation, resolving disagreements and conflicts, finding compromises and other business interactions require the ability to communicate effectively through words.

If personal relationships are impossible without emotions and feelings, then business communication is mostly unemotional. If emotions are present in it, then they are either hidden or expressed in the most restrained, ethical form. The literacy of speech and the culture of verbal communication are valued mainly.

But in matters of the heart, the ability to talk and negotiate is very important! Long-term love, friendships and, of course, a strong family are built on the ability to speak, listen and hear each other.

Oral speech is the main and very important means of verbal communication, but not the only one. Written speech and inner speech (dialogue with oneself) are also distinguished as separate verbal means of communication.

If you don’t need to learn non-verbalism (these are innate skills), then verbal means of communication involve the development of certain skills, namely:

perceive speech,
listen and hear what the interlocutor says,
speak competently (monologue) and conduct a conversation (dialogue),
write well,
conduct an internal dialogue.

The following communication skills are highly valued:

The ability to speak concisely, clearly articulating an idea,
the ability to speak briefly, to the point,
the ability not to deviate from the topic, to avoid a large number of “lyrical digressions”,
the ability to inspire, motivate, convince, motivate speech,
the ability to interest in speech, to be an interesting interlocutor,
honesty, the habit of telling the truth and not uttering unverified information (which may turn out to be a lie),
attentiveness during communication, the ability to accurately retell what was heard,
the ability to objectively accept and correctly understand what is said by the interlocutor,
the ability to “translate” the words of the interlocutor, determining for themselves their very essence,
the ability to take into account the level of intelligence and other individual psychological characteristics of the interlocutor (for example, not to use terms whose meanings the interlocutor probably does not know),
mood for a positive assessment of the speech of the interlocutor and his personality, the ability to find good intentions of a person even in negative words.

There are many other communication skills that are important for anyone who wants to be successful in their profession and happy in their personal lives.

What an excellent interlocutor it would not be possible to become, it must be borne in mind that human speech is imperfect.

Verbal communication is a mutual exchange of information, in which there are always several barriers. The meaning of words is lost, changed, misinterpreted, deliberately changed, and so on. This is because the information coming from the mouth of one person, coming to the second, overcomes several barriers.

Psychologist Predrag Mitsich in the book “How to conduct business conversations” described a scheme for the gradual impoverishment of information during verbal communication.

The complete information (all 100%) that needs to be conveyed to the interlocutor is contained only in the mind of the speaker. Inner speech is more varied, richer and deeper than outer speech, therefore, already during its transformation into external speech, 10% of information is lost.

This is the first barrier to verbal communication, which Mitsich called "The Limit of the Imagination." A person cannot express everything he wants through words because of their limitations (compared to thoughts).

The second barrier is the "Barrier of Desire". Even a thought that is ideally formulated to oneself is not always possible to express out loud the way one wants for various reasons, at least due to the fact that one has to adapt to one’s interlocutor and take into account the situation of communication with him. At this stage, another 10% of information is lost.

The fourth barrier is purely psychological - the “Attitude Barrier”. What and how one person hears, listening to another, depends on his attitude towards him. As a rule, out of 70% of the information heard, the interlocutor understands only 60% precisely for the reason that the need to logically comprehend what is heard is mixed with a personal attitude towards the speaker.

And finally, the last barrier is “memory volume”. This is not so much a barrier to direct verbal communication as human memory. In memory, on average, only about 25-10% of the information heard from another person remains.

This is how out of 100% of the information that was originally in the mind of one person, only 10% is transmitted to another.

That is why it is so important to convey your thought as accurately and fully as possible, to convey it clearly and unambiguously, to express it in words understandable to the interlocutor, to try to make him hear, understand and remember what was said.

Language as a means of communication

Do we know our native language? Of course, everyone will answer in the affirmative, because language is our main means of communication! But it turns out that grammar is only a component of the language, and the essence is not only in it. The bottom line is that language, as a means of communication, is the main component of speech.

Language is a historically formed system of meaningful forms, with its help people can turn their thoughts into a kind of public property and even into the spiritual wealth of society.

We all think we can communicate, but more often than not, our communication is just a banal exchange of information. However, everyone knows that the concept of "communication" can be much broader, deeper. This becomes clear when looking into the past. Educated people, since the sixteenth century, have communicated at a level that we simply cannot communicate at. Language served as a means of communication, but not only - it was a means of knowledge, a real art. Now we console ourselves, justifying ourselves with a lack of time, and continue to communicate, alas, at a fairly low, limited level.

The nature of language as a means of communication

Such a means of communication as language was formed historically, as human society and its needs developed. The nature of the language is symbolic, which means that every word that is a sign has a clear connection with objects and phenomena of the outside world. For each word, as a sign, historically, for several millennia, a certain meaning was assigned, understandable only to that group of people who know and use this language.

The nature of language stands out in its dual function: it is both an instrument of thought and a way of communication for people. Language also keeps the spiritual values ​​of society, works as a mechanism of social, cultural heredity.

With the development of technical and social progress, mankind slowly but surely expanded the range of its needs, because of this, the language also improved and developed, its vocabulary increased, its grammatical essence became more perfect. All this today allows society to transmit not only absolutely any information, but also many details of the information object, any of its shades.

Language is a means of communication and knowledge, but not only. It is also a means of accumulating and transferring social experience. Thanks to communication using language, the reflection of reality in the minds of one person is supplemented by what was in the minds of other people, because of this process, opportunities for information exchange grow.

Language and other means of communication

Communication with the help of words (verbal) is the main, most perfect form of communication. The level of language proficiency, culture and richness of speech determine the possibilities of communication, its effectiveness. But, in addition to language, there are other means of communication, these are: gestures, facial expressions, pauses, intonations, manners and even the appearance of a person. Communication, being a live communication of subjects, quite naturally shows the emotions of those who communicate, while it creates a non-verbal aspect of the exchange of information, information.

Non-verbal communication is a special language of feelings, a product of human development. It tends to significantly enhance the meaningful effect of verbal communication. Sometimes, under certain circumstances, non-verbal communication can replace verbal communication. For example, silence can sometimes be more eloquent than words, and glances can convey more feelings than sentences.

And the means of communication can be musical sounds, deeds and actions, images, drawings, drawings, symbols, signs and even mathematical formulas! The sign language of the deaf and dumb is also a means of communication. The main thing that people should remember when using means of communication is that it is important to maintain clarity of thought, and then the language of communication will always be clear.

Communication Development Tool

Communication is a complex multifaceted process of developing contacts between people, generated by the need for joint activities and including the exchange of information, the development of a unified interaction strategy, and the perception and understanding of another person.

Thus, there are three aspects to communication:

Communication (information exchange),
interaction (organization of interaction),
social perception (perception and knowledge of each other by partners).

In communication, content, purpose and means are distinguished.

Means of communication - ways of encoding, transmitting, processing and decoding information (through the senses, tactile contact, sign contacts).

Types of communication:

Direct (with the help of natural human organs);
- indirect (with the help of special means and tools);
- indirect (through intermediaries);
- interpersonal;
- role (participants-carriers of certain roles);
- verbal;
- non-verbal.

When they talk about communication in the narrow sense of the word, they mean that people communicate in the course of joint activities with their ideas, ideas, moods, feelings, attitudes. However, human communication is not limited to the transfer of information: information in the conditions of human communication is not only transmitted, but also formed, refined, and developed.

Firstly, communication cannot be understood only as sending information to some transmitting system and receiving it by another system, since, unlike the simple movement of information, we are dealing with the relationship of two active individuals, and their mutual informing involves the establishment of joint activities. When sending information to another participant, it is necessary to focus on him, that is, to analyze his motives, goals, attitudes, and contact him. Schematically: S=S (communication is an intersubjective process). It must also be assumed that in response to the information sent, new information will be received from the other partner.

In the communication process, there is not only the movement of information, but also an active exchange of it. The significance of information plays a special role for each participant in communication: after all, people do not just share knowledge, but also strive to develop a common meaning. This is possible only if the information is not just accepted, but also understood, comprehended, not just information, but a joint comprehension of the subject. Therefore, in each communication process, communication, activity and cognition are presented in unity.

Secondly, the exchange of information involves the impact on the partner's behavior. The effectiveness of communication is measured by how successful this impact was. When exchanging information, there is a change in the very type of relationship that has developed between the participants in communication.

Thirdly, communicative influence is possible only when the person sending the information (communicator) and the person receiving it (the recipient) have a single or similar codification system (everyone must speak the same language). Even the meaning of the same words is not always understood by people in the same way. The exchange of information is possible only when the signs and, most importantly, the meanings assigned to them, are known to all participants in the communication process (then they will be able to understand each other).

Thesaurus is a common system of meanings understood by all members of a group. The reason for the unequal understanding of the same words can be social, political, age characteristics of people. “Thought is never equal to the direct meaning of words” (L.S. Vygotsky). If what a person has conceived for the statement is taken as 100%, then only 90% is clothed in verbal forms (sentences), and only 80% is expressed. 70% is listened to from the planned, only 60% is understood, and 10-24% remains in memory.

Communicators also need the same understanding of the situation of communication (this is possible only if communication is included in a certain general system of activity). For example, a husband greeted at the door by his wife's words, "I bought some light bulbs today" should not be limited to their literal interpretation: he should understand that he needs to go to the kitchen and change the light bulb.

Fourthly, in the conditions of human communication, specific communication barriers may arise:

The transfer of any information is possible only through sign systems. Verbal communication uses human speech as a sign system. Speech is the most universal means of communication, since when information is transmitted using speech, only the style of the message is lost.

Speech has two functions:

1) communicative (means of communication),
2) significative (the form of the existence of thought).

With the help of speech, information is encoded and decoded: the communicator, in the process of speaking, encodes his intention with the help of words, and the recipient, in the process of listening, decodes this information. Disclosure of the meaning of the message is unthinkable outside the situation of joint activity. The accuracy of understanding can become obvious to the communicator only when the recipient himself turns into a communicator and, by his statement, lets know how he revealed the meaning of the received information. The success of verbal communication in the case of dialogue is determined by the extent to which the partners provide the thematic orientation of information, as well as its two-way nature.

How to increase the effect of speech impact?

A set of special measures aimed at improving the effectiveness of speech impact is called "persuasive communication".

Here are some persuasive communication techniques as an example. The speaker must have the ability to include the attention of the listener, if he resists the acceptance of information, to attract him with something, to confirm his authority, to improve the manner of presenting the material. An important factor in influencing the audience is the interaction of information and attitudes of the audience.

There are 3 positions of the communicator:

Open - the communicator openly declares himself a supporter of the stated point of view, cites facts to support it;
- detached - the communicator is emphatically neutral, comparing conflicting points of view, does not exclude orientation towards one of them, but does not openly declare it;
- closed - the communicator is silent about his point of view, even hides it, resorting to special measures.

Each of the positions has a certain efficiency to increase the effect of the impact, its choice depends on the purpose and objectives of the communication impact.

To fully describe the process of mutual influence of people on each other in the process of communication, it is necessary to refer to those sign systems that are included in communication in addition to speech. It is known that the transmission of information occurs due to words by 7%, sound means (tone of voice, intonation, sound) - by 38% and by non-verbal means 55%. If the verbal channel is used to convey information, then the non-verbal channel is used to "discuss" interpersonal relationships, and sometimes instead of verbal messages.

Non-verbal communication includes the following sign systems:

1. Optical-kinetic system (gestures, facial expressions, pantomimics). The motility of various parts of the body reflects the emotional reactions of a person, giving communication various nuances that may be ambiguous in different national cultures;
2. Paralinguistic system - vocalization system (voice quality, range, tonality). Extralinguistic system - the inclusion in speech of pauses, crying, laughter, coughing, the very pace of speech;
3. Organization of space and time of the communication process. Proxemics (founded by E. Hall) is a special area dealing with the norms of the spatial and temporal organization of communication.

Here are the distances of communication characteristic of American culture (each has a certain system of communication):

Intimate distance (0-45 cm) - intimate and friendly contacts, struggle, protection, communication with a small child.
Personal (45-120 cm) - friendly conversation, family conversation.
Social (120-400 cm) - the distance at which we keep with unfamiliar and unfamiliar people.
Public (400-750) - an appeal to a group of people, a ceremony.

Placement of partners carries a great semantic load. For example, placing partners face to face contributes to the emergence of contact, symbolizes attention to the speaker. Yelling at the back can evoke negative feelings.

Visual contact indicates readiness to support or prevent communication, encourages the partner to continue the dialogue, helps to more fully discover one's "I" or hide it. Addressing people usually look into each other's eyes (no more than 10 s). In the future, this period decreases and the more unpleasant the conversation, the less it is. An intrusive, persistent look causes a feeling of protest in people, as an invasion of the sphere of personal experiences, and is perceived by many as a sign of hostility.

Non-verbal means of communication are necessary in order to:

Create and maintain psychological contact,
give new shades to the verbal text,
express emotions, assessments, accepted role, meaning of the situation.

Non-verbal means are finely coordinated between themselves and words in general.

Means of speech communication

Speech communication is an active process of verbal communicative interaction of its participants (senders and recipients of information), which is characterized by a certain motive and is aimed at the implementation of a specific target setting. The communicative process proceeds based on the feedback in specific types of verbal activity.

Speech communication organically enters into all kinds of activities of the individual, for example, professional or social, since activity is impossible without communication. Verbal communicative interaction can be realized between several individuals or at least two. Speech communication is mutual and purposeful, as well as social. The form of manifestation of verbal communication is speech behavior, the responses of communication partners.

Etiquette of speech communication

Speech etiquette and communication rules are a system of norms of verbal behavior and invariable formulas of polite communications. Mastering the etiquette of verbal communication helps to gain authority, gives rise to trust and respect. Mastering the canons of verbal etiquette, their observance, contributes to the feeling of being a confident person, not experiencing a sense of awkwardness and difficulties in communication.

Mandatory adherence to the etiquette of verbal communication in business interactions leaves the partners with a pleasant impression of the person and the company as a whole, maintains its positive and attractive image.

The etiquette of verbal communication is determined by national specifics, since each nation in the process of its evolution developed its own system of rules for verbal behavior. In our modern society, such qualities as correctness, tact, courtesy, tolerance, goodwill, endurance are of particular value.

Tactfulness is an ethical canon that implies understanding by the speaker of the interaction partner, avoiding inappropriate remarks and questions, and discussing unpleasant topics.

Courtesy implies the ability to anticipate possible interrogative remarks and wishes of a communication partner, the readiness to discuss in detail with him all the points that are essential for the conversation.

Tolerance implies a calm attitude towards possible differences in positions and views, avoidance of sharp criticism in judgments. It is necessary to respect the views of other individuals, to strive to comprehend why it was they who formed this or that position. Tolerance is closely related to such a personal quality as restraint, which is the ability to calmly and calmly respond to sudden or tactless and interrogative remarks of the interlocutor.

Goodwill is necessary not only in relation to communication partners, but also in the process of the conversation itself, in its form and content, in the choice of words and intonation.

The etiquette of verbal communications has a close relationship with ethics, which prescribes the canons of moral behavior. Etiquette involves the use of certain styles of behavior in verbal communications and outwardly expressed formulas of politeness in specific verbal actions.

Following the requirements of etiquette will be considered deception of others and hypocrisy in violation of ethical standards. At the same time, ethical behavior that is not accompanied by the observance of the canons of etiquette will inevitably make an unfavorable impression and lead to doubts about the moral qualitative characteristics of the individual. Therefore, in oral communications, it is necessary to follow a whole range of ethical and etiquette canons, which are closely interconnected. Such a complex presupposes, firstly, a respectful and benevolent attitude towards the interlocutor. It is strictly forbidden to inflict insults, insults, and express disdain on the interlocutor with the help of verbal means. It is also recommended to avoid direct negative assessments of the personality of the interlocutor in a conversation, only specific actions are allowed to be assessed, while observing tact.

In intelligent communication of educated individuals, the use of rude words, obscene expressions, arrogance, cheeky formulas of speech is unacceptable. In a practical aspect, such speech formulations are also considered inappropriate, since they will never lead to the achievement of the desired communication results.

Politeness in communicative interaction is aimed at understanding the situation as a whole, taking into account the age category, gender, professional and social status of the interlocutor. These factors determine the degree of official communications, determine the choice of etiquette formulas, suitable topics for discussion.

The speaking partner needs to be modest in self-assessment, try not to impose personal judgments, avoid excessive categoricalness and ultimatum in speech.

In addition, one should direct all attention to the communication partner, show interest in his personality, opinion, take into account his interest in a particular topic. It is also necessary to take into account the ability of the interlocutor to perceive and understand the meaning of the speaker's statements. Therefore, in the process of a monologue, you should give him time to “breathe” and concentrate. To this end, it is necessary to avoid too long statements, it is useful to make small intervals in the course of a conversation, to use verbal formulas for maintaining contact. Norms of communication also determine the behavior of the listener.

Speech etiquette and communication rules for the listener, firstly, suggest the need to spend time and postpone business in order to be able to listen to the speaker.

In the process of listening, a person should treat the speaker with respect and patience, while striving to carefully listen to all the information to the end. In official verbal communication, it is absolutely unacceptable to interrupt a communication partner, to insert various remarks during his monologue, especially those that negatively characterize the speaker's judgments and requests. The listener, as well as the speaker, should focus on his interlocutor, emphasize his own interest in interacting with him.

Speech etiquette, communication rules and ethics also cover written speech.

Speech means of communication

Verbal (sign) communicative interaction is realized with the help of words. Human speech is considered a verbal means of communication. Studies show that the modern "homo sapiens" pronounces approximately 30 thousand words per day, and about three thousand per hour. Words form a variety of speech texts that are formed depending on the goals of the communicants, for example, to inform or learn something, to express an attitude or to induce to something. Such texts are oral or written. They implement language systems, which are systems of signs and methods of their combination. Language systems serve as a kind of tool that contributes to the expression of thoughts, the manifestation of feelings and desires of subjects. They are the most important means of verbal communication.

Language as a means of verbal communication has various purposes. It acts as a core means of communicative interaction. Thanks to this purpose of language systems, people have the ability to fully interact in society as a whole and with subjects individually. This purpose of language systems is considered to be their communicative function. In addition to the function of communication, language as a means of verbal communication has a number of other functions, such as cognitive, accumulative, constructive, emotional, contact-establishing and ethnic.

The cognitive function of language is an expression of the activity of human consciousness. After all, people receive an essential part of information about the outside world through language.

The accumulative function involves the accumulation and preservation of experience, the storage of knowledge for use in later life. In everyday life, people are helped by keeping diaries or notebooks. And a kind of "notebooks", the heritage of all mankind is all kinds of monuments of writing and literature.

The constructive function is to form thoughts and various judgments. With the help of language systems, thought, as it were, acquires a material shell and a sound form. Expressed with the help of words, the thought becomes clear and understandable, first of all, for the individual who expressed it.

The emotional function is one of the tools for expressing feelings and emotional states. This function is realized through speech only under the condition of a direct expression of the individual's emotional attitude to the information that he reports. In this case, intonation plays a major role.

The contact-establishing function is expressed in establishing contact between individuals. At times, communication can be aimless, and its information content can be zero, which means preparing the ground for further productive and trusting communication.

The ethnic function lies in the unification of the people.

Speech and verbal communication

Speech is the most important component of the communicative interaction of people, which serves to express their thoughts, emotional moods, goals and plans. With the help of verbal communication, the individual has the opportunity to interact with the surrounding society. Any speech is focused on the intellect, feelings, intentions and desires of the listeners.

In the context of communicative verbal interaction, speech is characterized by a number of psychological properties that reflect the individual (personal) and group (collective) characteristics of people who have entered into verbal interaction. These include information content, clarity, content, expressiveness, impact. The listed properties are determined by various skills, such as speaking logically, achieving semantic unity of phrases, using paralinguistic means, using kinetic techniques, and using extralinguistic details of communication.

The external expression of feelings and emotional states, as well as the attitude of the speaker himself in relation to what he says, is called the expressiveness of speech. Expressiveness tools include facial expressions and gestures, rhythm, intonation, accents, intervals and stress, aphorisms and jokes. Some people, unfortunately, justify rude words and the use of obscene expressions during a conversation with this property of speech. They consider profanity an integral part of the language system, which leaves an imprint on speech culture and etiquette as a whole.

The informativeness of speech is due to the importance of the voiced message for the interlocutors. A vivid example of the low information content of the material is the following statements: “water is wet”, “fish is found in water”, etc. The informativeness of speech increases by 15% with the proper use of intonations and pauses.

The impact of speech is the possibility of its impact on communication partners, directs their thoughts and actions in the right direction.

Speech communication serves to express a specific communicative intention of the speaker and consists of communicative components that have different functions. The condition for effective communication is a complex, multifaceted category, which is a unity of linguistic understanding, cultural and social knowledge, and psychological experience.

Effective verbal communication involves not only mastering linguistic and linguistic skills, but also knowledge related to understanding the patterns of verbal communication in the integrity and interconnectedness of all its components, namely the material and spiritual culture of the language, the structural and content structure of communication activities; sociocultural canons and models of verbal communication, etc.

Types of speech communication

Speech is the main mechanism of verbal communication. Speech communication occurs with the help of language systems. Verbal communication can be both internal and external. External verbal communication, in turn, is oral and written. Oral verbal interaction is divided into monologue and dialogic speech.

Types of verbal communication are closely related. They are united by pronouncing words to themselves or aloud. Along with this, each of the types of verbal communication has subjective specific characteristics. A thought cannot be formulated without a language system and material verbal processes. In preparation for oral or written speech, an intermediate phase of pronouncing the text to oneself is distinguished. This phase is called inner speech.

External written speech is mediated by text. It is more concentrated in its content than colloquial. Verbal writing is understood as a verbal process with the use of written signs. Written speech is formed by a complex correlation of sounds that are formed due to the perception of letters by the hearing aid, visible to the eye, and speech movements reproduced by the individual. It follows that written speech is based on oral speech.

The audible speech spoken by someone is called oral speech. She is limited by space and time, which is imprinted on her character, since in general, communication partners are at a distance of visibility or hearing from each other. The nature of verbal communication during television broadcasting changes significantly, when the audience does not have the opportunity to respond.

Speech communication can be classified by content, namely material, cognitive (cognitive), conditional (emotional), motivational, activity. It can also be classified according to the interaction techniques used and depending on the tasks, namely the contact of masks, secular communication, formal role-playing and business communication, interpersonal, manipulative communication.

Material communication is the exchange of products of activity. Cognitive or cognitive communication involves the exchange of data, knowledge, experience. Emotional or conditional interaction contains the exchange of emotional moods between individuals who have entered into communication. Motivational interaction is an exchange of intentions, motives, tasks, interests, plans or needs. Activity communication covers the exchange of skills carried out as a result of joint activities.

The contact of masks is called formal communication, which consists in the absence of the desire to comprehend and take into account the characteristic features of the partner's personality.

The essence of secular communication lies in its pointlessness. In other words, communicating individuals do not talk about what they think, but about what is supposed to be said in the circumstances.

Formal role communication consists in regulation and content, where the main role is played by the social status of the interlocutor and his place in the official or social hierarchy.

Business communication is a process of interaction in which data and messages are exchanged in order to achieve the desired result.

Interpersonal communication, or it is also called intimate-personal communication, consists in revealing deep personal structures. Manipulative interaction is aimed at obtaining benefits from the interlocutor.

Culture of communication and speech etiquette

One of the main criteria of an individual's culture is the level of culture of his speech. Therefore, each person needs to strive to improve their own communication styles and speech etiquette. The level of speech culture depends not only on the ability to avoid mistakes in communications, but also on the desire to regularly enrich vocabulary, the ability to listen and the desire to understand a partner, respect his views, and the ability to choose the right words depending on the situation of interaction.

Speech is considered one of the most important characteristics inherent in personality. The impression that people make on the surrounding society depends on the style of communicative interaction.

The speech of an individual has the ability to attract society, other individuals to his personality or, conversely, repel them. Speech can also have a strong effect on the mood of communication partners. Thus, the culture of verbal communications is formed from the ability to listen to the speaker, speech etiquette, and following the rules of good manners.

Often, people, being carried away by the topic of conversation, forget about the culture of communication interaction. They try to impose their own judgments, positions and views on the topic of conversation on the partner, do not try to delve into the counterarguments that the opponent gives and simply do not listen to him, which ultimately leads to the neglect of speech etiquette and the cessation of monitoring what they say.

The culture of communication and speech etiquette categorically prohibits any pressure on a conversation partner. In addition to the fact that imposing one's own position looks rather ugly from the outside, it is also ineffectual. This style of behavior will most likely cause a defensive reaction on the part of the partner, which at best will lead to ineffective conversation, and at worst to conflict situations.

If a communication partner does not listen to his opponent, constantly interrupts him, not allowing him to finish his speech, then this will not only be a demonstration of the lack of culture of speech, but also a manifestation of disrespect for the personality of the partner, which will characterize the interlocutor who does not know how to listen, not at all positively. The ability to listen is an integral part of the culture of communicative interaction.

A verbal communication tool and speech etiquette are today considered two of the most important components of success, both in communication and in other activities. They contribute to establishing contacts with people, increasing the effectiveness of communication, inclining the mass audience to their own position. The influence of speech culture on the behavior of the speaker is invaluable.

Features of speech communication

Speech today is the most important mechanism of human communication. It goes from an individual to one individual, several or many. The communicative process itself can be simplified as follows: on the one hand, there is a speaking subject (sender of information), and on the other hand, a recipient of information or a listening subject (addressee). The sender and receiver interact to broadcast information represented as a sequence of signals consisting of a set of letters, sounds, etc. To receive information, there must be a certain system of adequacy of elementary messages and reality, which is familiar to both the speaker and the listener. Such a system of correspondences is called a language system or language.

The difference between language and speech is the presence of categories in language systems, while speech contains a continuous series (continuum). It follows that the communication process consists of six components: contact and message, sender and recipient, code and reality. The human personality is always the source of speech, since it is not the person who speaks, but his personality.

Features of verbal communication are marked by target settings, which can be many. After all, they are closely related to the needs of the individual in a communicative influence on the surrounding individuals, for example, the desire to force them to perform a certain action, to convince of something, to evoke some emotion, etc. They also distinguish between the target settings of the speech process, which are not in the general sense a communicative interaction, for example, a prisoner in a punishment cell makes a speech not for communication, but in order not to forget the words, the construction of sentences and their sound.

The main component of any target setting of the speech process should be an additional aspect of morality, which excludes conscious deception, lies, misinformation, etc.

Means of communication for preschoolers

The definition of communication is necessary, first of all, because the term itself is widely used in Russian everyday everyday speech, where it has an intuitively understood, but not scientifically defined meaning. Such a definition is also required because in the scientific literature the meaning of the term "communication" depends on the theoretical positions of the researchers who use it.

The nature of communication, its individual and age characteristics, the mechanisms of flow and change have become the subject of study by philosophers and sociologists (B. D. Parygin, I. S. Kon), psycholinguists (A. A. Leontiev), specialists in social psychology (B. F. Porshnev, G. M. Andreeva), child and developmental psychology (V. S. Mukhina, Ya. L. Kolominsky). However, different researchers invest in the concept of communication is not the same meaning.

So, N. M. Shchelovanov and N. M. Aksarina call the affectionate speech of an adult addressed to a baby as communication; M. S. Kagan considers it legitimate to talk about the communication of man with nature and with himself.

Some researchers (G. A. Ball, V. N. Branovitsky, A. M. Dovgyallo) recognize the reality of the relationship between a person and a machine, while others believe that “talking about communication with inanimate objects (for example, with a computer) has only metaphorical meaning. It is known that many definitions of communication have been proposed abroad. So, referring to the data of D. Dens, A. A. Leontieva reports that by 1969 alone in the English-language literature, 96 definitions of the concept of communication had been proposed.

Communication is a complex and multifaceted process that can act at the same time as a process of interaction between individuals, and as an information process, and as the attitude of people to each other, and as a process of their mutual influence on each other, and as a process of empathy and mutual understanding of each other.

The subjects of communication are living beings, people. In principle, communication is characteristic of any living beings, but only at the human level does the process of communication become conscious, connected by verbal and non-verbal acts.

Communication is also characterized by the fact that here each participant acts as a person, and not as a physical object, a “body”. Examination by a physician of an unconscious patient is not communication. When communicating, people are tuned in to the fact that the partner will answer them, and count on his feedback. A. A. Bodalev, E. O. Smirnova and other psychologists pay attention to this feature of communication. On this basis, B. F. Lomov argues that "communication is the interaction of people entering into it as subjects," and a little further: "Communication requires at least two people, each of whom acts precisely as a subject." Communication is the interaction of two (or more) people aimed at harmonizing and combining their efforts in order to establish relationships and achieve a common result.

We agree with everyone who emphasizes that communication is not just an action, but precisely an interaction: it is carried out between the participants, each of whom is equally a carrier of activity and assumes it in his partners.

The concept of communication is closely related to the concept of communication. The act of communication is evaluated and analyzed according to the following components: the addressee - the subject of communication, the addressee - to whom the message is sent; message - transmitted content; code - the means of transmitting a message, a communication channel and a result - what is achieved as a result of communication.

This approach is presented in the works of Ch. Osgood, J. Miller, G.M. Andreeva, Yu.A. Sherkovin and others. This is a system-communicative-information approach.

Another common approach to communication, considering it as a psychological category, we interpret it as an activity, and therefore the term communicative activity is a synonym for communication for us.

Therefore, there are several approaches to understanding communication. It is most expedient to consider communication as an inseparable unity of communication and activity.

Several different theories of activity have been developed. The concepts of S. L. Rubinshtein, B. G. Ananiev, L. S. Vygotsky, A. N. Leontiev received the greatest recognition among them. The following aspects of communication are distinguished: communicative, interactive, perceptual. These aspects of communication appear simultaneously. The communicative side is manifested in the exchange of information, the interactive side - in the implementation of the interaction of communication partners, provided that they unambiguously encode and decode sign (verbal, non-verbal) communication systems, the perceptual side - in the "reading" of the interlocutor due to such psychological mechanisms as comparison, identification, apperception, reflection.

The most universal means of human communication is language and speech. Language is the main system by which we encode information and is the main tool of communication. With the help of language, knowledge of the world is carried out, self-knowledge of the individual is objectified in language. Language exists and is realized through speech.

In speech communication, such features as:

Meaning, meaning of words, phrases. The accuracy of the use of the word, its expressiveness and accessibility, the correct pronunciation of sounds, the expressiveness and meaning of intonation play an important role.

Speech sound phenomena: speech rate, voice pitch modulation, voice tonality, rhythm, timbre, intonation, diction.

Non-verbal influences include facial expressions, pantomime, gestures, as well as the distance at which the interlocutors communicate.

Monologue communication provides for interpersonal communication of unequal partners who do not have equal activity. Dialogue, on the other hand, presupposes conjugation and simultaneity of actions; change of positions of influencing and reflecting, mutual intellectual-volitional activity; exchange action.

There are two types of monologue communication: imperative and manipulative.

Role-playing communication involves some form of regulation of the content, means of communication; communication is carried out from the positions of the corresponding social roles. Personal communication is possible with the knowledge of the personality of the partner, the ability to anticipate his reactions, interests, beliefs, attitude.

Ritual communication is most often a prologue to building relationships, but it can also perform independent functions in the life of a modern person: strengthening the psychological connection with the group, increasing self-esteem, demonstrating one's attitudes and values, that is, in ritual communication a person confirms his existence as a member of society some important group. At its core, it is role-playing. A distinctive feature of ritual relations is their impersonality.

Dialogue communication is an equal subject-subject interaction aimed at mutual knowledge, self-knowledge and self-development of communication partners.

Relations on which social norms and rules have an unexpressed, indirect influence can be characterized as direct, contact, and the type of communication that creates them can be characterized as an interpersonal type of communication.

By means of communication can be direct and indirect, direct and indirect.

Direct communication is carried out with the help of natural organs given to a living being by nature: hands, head, torso, vocal cords, etc.

Mediated communication is associated with the use of special means and tools for organizing communication and information exchange. These are either natural objects (a stick, a thrown stone, a footprint on the ground, etc.), or cultural ones (sign systems, symbol recordings on various media, print, radio, television, etc.).

Direct communication involves personal contacts and direct perception of each other by communicating people in the act of communication itself, for example, bodily contacts, conversations of people with each other, their communication in those cases when they see and directly react to each other's actions.

Indirect communication is carried out through intermediaries, which can be other people (say, negotiations between conflicting parties at the interstate, international, group, family levels).

Among the types of communication, one can also distinguish business and personal, instrumental and targeted. Business communication is usually included as a private moment in any joint productive activity of people and serves as a means of improving the quality of this activity. Its content is what people are doing, and not those problems that affect their inner world. Unlike business personal communication, on the contrary, it is focused mainly around psychological problems of an internal nature, those interests and needs that deeply and intimately affect a person’s personality: the search for the meaning of life, the definition of one’s attitude to a significant person, to what is happening around, resolution some internal conflict, etc.

Communication can be called instrumental, which is not an end in itself, is not stimulated by an independent need, but pursues some other goal, in addition to obtaining satisfaction from the very act of communication.

Target - this is communication, which in itself serves as a means of satisfying a specific need, in this case, the need for communication.

In human life, communication does not exist as a separate process or an independent form of activity. It is included in individual or group practical activity, which can neither arise nor be realized without intensive and versatile communication.

The most important types of communication in humans are verbal and non-verbal. Non-verbal communication does not involve the use of spoken language, natural language, as a means of communication.

Non-verbal communication is communication through facial expressions, gestures and pantomime, through direct sensory or bodily contact. These are tactile, visual, auditory, olfactory and other sensations and images received from another person. Most of the non-verbal forms and means of communication in humans are innate and allow him to interact, achieving mutual understanding at the emotional and behavioral levels, not only with his own kind, but also with other living beings.

Verbal communication is inherent only to a person and, as a prerequisite, involves the acquisition of a language. In terms of its communicative capabilities, it is much richer than all types and forms of non-verbal communication, although in life it cannot completely replace it. And the very development of verbal communication initially certainly relies on non-verbal means of communication.

So, in the course of communication, people address each other in the hope of getting an echo, an answer. This makes it easy to separate acts of communication from all other acts. If the child, listening to you, looks into your face and, smiling in response to your kind words, looks into your eyes, you can be sure that you are communicating.

But then the child, attracted by the noise in the next room, turned away or tilted his head, looking with interest at the beetle in the grass - and communication was interrupted: it was replaced by the child's cognitive activity. Communication can be separated from other types of human activity into a separate episode.

This happens, for example, when people are concentrated, discuss their relationships, show each other opinions about their own or someone else's actions, actions.

In preschool children, communication, as a rule, is closely intertwined with the game, the study of objects, drawing and other activities and is intertwined with it. The child is either busy with his partner (adult, peer), then switches to other things. But even brief moments of communication are a holistic activity that children have a peculiar form of existence. Therefore, as a subject of psychological analysis, communication is a well-known abstraction. Communication is not completely reduced to the sum of the observed isolated contacts of the child with other people, although it is in them that it manifests itself and on the basis is constructed into an object of scientific study. Different types of communication are usually combined with each other in everyday life.

Thus communication is many-sided; includes many forms, types. Until now, there is no unity in the interpretation of the concept of "communication" and its mechanisms. This gives rise to various approaches to the study of communication, however, almost all researchers note that without human communication, the full development of the child is impossible; communication is the most important factor in the formation of personality, so communication is the best way to know yourself.

Means of communication with children

Basic human needs are the needs for security, acceptance and communication, without which the harmonious development of the individual is impossible.

Traditionally, Russian psychology considers the process of mental development as the result of a person's appropriation of social experience. A. N. Leontiev wrote: “This is a process that results in the reproduction by an individual of historically formed human properties, abilities and ways of behavior.” A.N. Leontiev, comparing the mechanisms of development of the psyche of animals and humans, focused on the fact that the development of the human psyche is subject to the laws of socio-historical development.

For the first time, K. Marx and F. Engels wrote about the role of communication in the mental development of a person. F. Engels pointed out that the development of the human psyche took place under the influence of joint labor activity, where the transfer of the results of practical, theoretical activity to the older generations to the younger ones played a decisive role. Marx considered communication both as a condition for the existence of a person and as a condition for his development, he attached special importance to communication as a means of self-knowledge and self-understanding of a person.

Unique studies on the role of communication in the mental development of a child were carried out by employees of the Hungarian Methodological Center for Orphanages named after E. Pikler. In the works of E. Pickler, Y. Falk and others, the negative impact of impersonal communication between an adult and a child on the intellectual, emotional and social development of the child was proved, the “hospitalism syndrome” was studied and described in detail. As an alternative to the existing system of education in state guardianship institutions, a new system of raising children was created. This system is based on full-fledged, personal communication between an adult and a child, joint activities with the maximum activity of the child himself. E. Pickler considered it important for teachers to show love for children within the framework of high professionalism. Communication with children should not be impersonal, indifferent, stereotyped by an adult. However, the love of the educator for the child will not be able to replace his maternal love, and the teacher should not strive for this, you cannot promise the children what he is unable to do. At the same time, teachers should direct their efforts towards the overall development of the child, laying the foundation for emotional security for all children in the group without exception. E. Pickler considered the manifestation of the child's activity in situations of communication with an adult to be a significant condition for the overall development of children.

In modern domestic research, communication is considered as a condition for self-actualization and self-realization of a person, which is carried out in a single space of a person with other people (V. I. Slobodchikov, Z. I. Ryabikina, E. G. Somova, etc.). Self-realization is manifested in creative individuality in the processes of interaction with other people (M. S. Kagan, E. L. Zlobina, etc.).

Studies have appeared in which communication, meeting with the Other, coexistence is considered as an external prerequisite for the self-development of the individual (K. A. Albukhanova-Slavskaya, A. A. Bodalev, V. S. Mukhina, A. B. Orlov, I. S. Yakimanskaya and etc.).

However, in domestic science, studies of the role of communication as a condition for the socialization of a child are most common. The conceptual ideas of research in this direction were developed by L. S. Vygotsky. He believed that the higher mental functions are initially presented as external, arising as a result of cooperation with other people, and only gradually they become internal, turning from "interpsychic" into "intrapsychic". The child's internalization of joint activity with an adult is the main source of socialization, communication in this case is the mechanism of this process.

Emphasizing the importance of a child's communication with adults, M. I. Lisina points out that it appears much earlier than communication with a peer and "serves as the only possible context in which he comprehends and" appropriates "what people have previously obtained." Determining the importance of communication for the development of a child, M. I. Lisina wrote: “Communication with adults affects the development of children at all stages of early and preschool childhood. There is no reason to say that with the age of the child, the role of communication increases or decreases.

According to M. I. Lisina, communication with an adult can accelerate or slow down the course of a child’s development, correct defects that have arisen due to improper upbringing of a child. This position is confirmed in the studies of U.V. Ul'enkova, E.E. Dmitrieva, V.P. Kritskaya and others. The role of communication in the development of children with mild forms of psychological underdevelopment, as well as in the development of autistic children, has been proved.

We can talk about the effect of the complex developmental nature of communication on the mental development of preschool children on the basis of studies conducted in the domestic school of psychology. It has been proven that communication develops various areas of the child's psyche: the very field of communication (Kh. T. Belbaeva, E. O. Smirnova, M. I. Lisina); curiosity of children (D. B. Godovikova, T. D. Sartorius); emotional experiences (S. Yu. Meshcheryakova); formation of attitudes towards adults and peers (S. V. Kornitskaya, R. A. Smirnova); in the field of mastering speech (M. G. Elagina, A. G. Ruzskaya); in the sphere of personality and self-awareness of children (N. N. Avdeeva, M. I. Lisina, I. T. Dimitrov, A. I. Silvestru); in the field of arbitrary regulation and the internal plan of action (M. I. Lisina, G. I. Kapchelya); in the field of the formation of a child's general ability to learn (U. V. Ul'enkova, E. E. Dmitrieva).

The mechanisms of the influence of communication on the mental development of a child were studied by M. I. Lisina and her students. M. I. Lisina suggested that the development of a child’s personality is determined by the types of relationships that he develops in practical activities, and the appearance of neoplasms in otnogenesis occurs at the points of mutual intersection and mutual transformation of three lines of relationships: attitudes to the objective world, attitudes towards other people, attitudes to himself. M. I. Lisina considers communication in the context of the leading activity of the child, she believes that "the leading activity of the child is always associated with communication, which takes a form that is adequate to the leading activity." “Taking into account communication, one can come closer to understanding the mechanisms of change of leading activities. Communicating in the course of activities with older children and especially with adults, the child acts at a level that exceeds his usual norm. More precisely, he finds himself within the "zone of proximal development."

Analyzing the nature of the leading activity and the features of communication between a child and an adult, M. I. Lisina identifies several forms of communication with a child: situational-personal, situational-business, extra-situational-cognitive, extra-situational-personal.

Based on the works of M. I. Lisina, E. E. Dmitrieva, T. I. Chirkova and others, we presented in the table the ratio of the nature of the leading activity and the specific forms of communication with preschool children, it was also important for us to highlight the nature of the reinforcing and developmental influences of an adult.

Means of communicative communication

Communication is a process of two-way exchange of information leading to mutual understanding. Communication - translated from Latin means "common, shared with everyone." If mutual understanding is not achieved, then communication has not taken place. To ensure the success of communication, you need to have feedback on how people understood you, how they perceive you, how they relate to the problem.

Communicative competence - the ability to establish and maintain the necessary contacts with other people. Effective communication is characterized by: achieving mutual understanding of partners, a better understanding of the situation and the subject of communication (achieving greater certainty in understanding the situation contributes to solving problems, ensures the achievement of goals with the optimal use of resources). Communicative competence is considered as a system of internal resources necessary to build effective communication in a certain range of situations of interpersonal interaction.

Reasons for poor communication can be:

A) stereotypes - simplified opinions about individuals or situations, as a result there is no objective analysis and understanding of people, situations, problems;
b) "preconceived notions" - the tendency to reject everything that contradicts one's own views, that is new, unusual ("We believe what we want to believe"). We rarely realize that another person's interpretation of events is just as legitimate as our own;
c) bad relations between people, because if a person's attitude is hostile, it is difficult to convince him of the justice of your view;
d) lack of attention and interest of the interlocutor, but occurs when a person realizes the meaning of in for himself: with the help of this information, you can get the desired or prevent an undesirable development of events;
e) neglect of facts, i.e. the habit of making conclusions in the absence of a sufficient number;
f) errors in the construction of statements: wrong words, complexity of the message, weak persuasiveness, illogicality, etc.;
g) the wrong choice of strategy and tactics of communication.

Communication strategies:

1) open - closed communication;
2) monologue-dialogical;
3) role-playing (based on the social role) - personal (heart-to-heart communication). Open communication is the desire and ability to fully express one's point of view and readiness to take into account the positions of others. Closed communication - unwillingness or inability to express clearly one's point of view, one's attitude, the available information.

The use of closed communications is justified in the following cases:

1) if there is a significant difference in the degree of subject competence and it is pointless to spend time and effort on raising the competence of the "low side";
2) in conflict situations, the opening of one's feelings, plans to the enemy is inappropriate. Open communications are effective if there is comparability, but not the identity of subject positions (exchange of opinions, ideas). “One-way questioning” is a semi-closed communication in which a person tries to find out the position of another person, and at the same time does not reveal his position. “Hysterical presentation of the problem” - a person openly expresses his feelings, problems, circumstances, not being interested in whether the other person wants to “enter into other people's circumstances”, listen to “outpourings”.

There are the following types of communication:

1) "Mask contact" - formal communication, when there is no desire to understand and take into account the personality of the interlocutor, the usual masks are used (politeness, severity, indifference, modesty, sympathy, etc.) - a set of facial expressions, gestures, standard phrases that allow hide true emotions, attitude towards the interlocutor. In the city, the contact of masks is even necessary in some situations so that people do not “hurt” each other unnecessarily in order to “isolate themselves” from the interlocutor.
2) Primitive communication, when they evaluate another person as a necessary or interfering object: if necessary, they actively make contact, if it interferes, they will push away or aggressive rude remarks will follow. If they received what they wanted from the interlocutor, then they lose further interest in him and do not hide it.
3) Formal-role communication, when both the content and the means of communication are regulated, and instead of knowing the personality of the interlocutor, knowledge of his social role is dispensed with.
4) Business communication, when the characteristics of the personality, character, age, mood of the interlocutor are taken into account, but the interests of the business are more significant than possible personal differences.
5) Spiritual, interpersonal communication of friends, when you can touch on any topic and it is not necessary to resort to the help of words, a friend will understand you by facial expression, movements, intonation. Such communication is possible when each participant has an image of the interlocutor, knows his personality, can anticipate his reactions, interests, beliefs, attitudes.
6) Manipulative communication is aimed at extracting benefits from the interlocutor, using different techniques (flattery, intimidation, “splurge”, deceit, de kindness, etc.) depending on the personality of the interlocutor.
7) Secular communication. The essence of secular communication is its pointlessness, that is, people do not say what they think, but what is supposed to be said in such cases; this communication is closed, because the points of view of people on a particular issue do not matter and do not determine the nature of communications.

Secular Communication Code:

1) politeness, tact - "observe the interests of another";
2) approval, consent - “do not blame another”, “avoid objections”;
3) sympathy - "be friendly, affable."

Code of business communication is different:

1) the principle of cooperativeness - “your contribution should be the one that the jointly accepted direction of the conversation requires”;
2) the principle of information sufficiency - "say no more and no less than what is required at the moment";
3) the principle of information quality - "do not lie";
4) the principle of expediency - "do not deviate from the topic, be able to find a solution";
5) “express the thought clearly and convincingly for the interlocutor;
6) “know how to listen and understand the right thought;
7) "be able to take into account the individual characteristics of the interlocutor for the sake of the interests of the case."

If one interlocutor is guided by the principle of "politeness", and the other - by the principle of cooperativeness, they can get into ridiculous, ineffective communication. Therefore, the rules of communication must be agreed upon and followed by both participants.

Communication tactics is the implementation of a communicative strategy in a specific situation based on the possession of techniques and knowledge of the rules of communication. Communication technique is a set of specific communicative skills of speaking and listening skills.

Functions of communication tools

Communication functions are the roles and tasks that communication performs in the process of human social life:

1) the information and communication function consists in the exchange of information between individuals. The constituent elements of communication are: the communicator (transmits information), the content of the message, the recipient (receives the message). The effectiveness of information transfer is manifested in the understanding of information, its acceptance or rejection, assimilation. To implement the information and communication function, it is necessary to have a single or similar system for codifying/decodifying messages. The transfer of any information is possible through various sign systems;
2) incentive function - stimulation of the activity of partners for the organization of joint actions;
3) integrative function - the function of bringing people together;
4) the function of socialization - communication contributes to the development of skills for human interaction in society according to the norms and rules adopted in it;
5) coordination function - coordination of actions in the implementation of joint activities;
6) function of understanding - adequate perception and understanding of information;
7) the regulatory-communicative (interactive) function of communication is aimed at regulating and correcting behavior in the direct organization of joint activities of people in the process of their interaction;
8) the affective-communicative function of communication consists in influencing the emotional sphere of a person, which can be purposeful or involuntary.

Means of communication - ways of encoding, transmitting, processing and decoding information transmitted in the process of communication. They are verbal and non-verbal.

Verbal means of communication are words with meanings assigned to them. Words can be spoken aloud (oral speech), written (written speech), replaced by gestures in the blind, or spoken silently.

Oral speech is a simpler and more economical form of verbal means.

It is divided into:

1) dialogic speech, in which two interlocutors take part;
2) monologue speech - a speech delivered by one person.

Written speech is used when oral communication is impossible or when accuracy and accuracy of each word is necessary.

Non-verbal means of communication is a sign system that complements and enhances verbal communication, and sometimes even replaces it. With the help of non-verbal means of communication, about 55-65% of information is transmitted.

Non-verbal means of communication include:

1) visual aids:
a) kinesthetic means are visually perceived movements of another person that perform an expressive and regulatory function in communication. Kinesics includes expressive movements, manifested in facial expressions, posture, gesture, gaze, gait;
b) gaze direction and eye contact;
c) facial expression;
d) eye expression;
e) posture - the location of the body in space (“foot on foot”, cross of arms, cross of legs, etc.);
f) distance (distance to the interlocutor, angle of rotation to him, personal space);
g) skin reactions (redness, perspiration);
h) auxiliary means of communication (body features (sex, age)) and means of their transformation (clothes, cosmetics, glasses, jewelry, tattoos, mustaches, beards, cigarettes, etc.);
2) acoustic (sound):
a) related to speech (loudness, timbre, intonation, tone, pitch, rhythm, speech pauses and their localization in the text);
b) not related to speech (laughter, gnashing of teeth, crying, coughing, sighing, etc.);
3) tactile - associated with touch:
a) physical impact (leading the blind by the hand, etc.);
b) takevika (shaking hands, clapping on the shoulder).

One of the greatest treasures of mankind and the greatest pleasures of man is the opportunity to communicate with his own kind. The happiness of communication is estimated by everyone who, for one reason or another, had to lose it, to remain alone for a long time. Human society is inconceivable without communication between members of society, without communication. Communication- this is, first of all, the exchange of information, communication (from lat. communication- ‘to make common’). This is an exchange of thoughts, information, ideas, etc., this is an exchange of information, information interaction.

One of the first information needs of a person is to receive information from another person or transfer information to him, i.e. information exchange. The very formation of information often occurs in the process of information exchange between people. Information flows permeate all types of human activity - social, scientific, cognitive, etc.

Two layers of information accumulate in the mind of every person: scientific and everyday. There are also such two types of information as information that is part of the public consciousness and information that has uniqueness, originality, belonging only to this individual.

The concept of information is applicable when there is a system and some interaction during which certain information is transmitted. Without taking into account the consumer, even an imaginary, potential one, it is impossible to talk about information. Information is sometimes understood as a message. However, it is impossible to talk about information without regard to the process of perception of the message. Only by connecting with the consumer does the message "highlight" the information. By itself, it does not contain informational substance. The same message to one consumer can give a lot of information, but little to another.

Information has a producer and a consumer, a subject and an object. In the twentieth century the information model of communication has become widespread. Automatic (cybernetic) systems using (de)coding devices began to be used



Thanks to communication, the input information is reproduced at the other end of the chain. Information is converted into code signals, which are broadcast through a communication channel.

Human communication involves a sender (the speaker) and a receiver (the listener). The speaker and listener own a language (de)coding device and mental processors. This is a simplified understanding of human communication.

Information communication of a person with the outside world is two-way: a person receives the necessary information and, in turn, produces it. Man himself as a social individual develops due to the interaction of two information flows, genetic information and information that continuously comes to a person throughout his life from the environment.

Consciousness is not inherited. It is formed in the process of communicating with other people, learning their experience, as well as the experience accumulated by many generations. A person receives both live, momentary information, and information accumulated, stored in the form of books, paintings, sculptures and other cultural values. The acquisition of such information makes a person a social being. The information that is inherited in this way is called social information.

Linguists consider verbal information, information extracted from speech messages.

A natural (though not the only) way of exchanging information is verbal communication. Speech materializes consciousness, making it the property of not one person, but also other members of the collective, turns individual consciousness into a part of the social, individual information into public, and also reveals the information of the whole society for its individual members.

Among linguists, the speech communication scheme described by R. Jacobson is widespread. A communicative act, according to R. Jacobson, includes the following components: 1) message, 2) addresser (sender), 3) addressee (recipient). Both partners use 4) a code, "totally or at least partially shared." Behind the message is the context perceived by the addressee 5) (or referent, denotation). Finally, 6) contact is needed, understood as “a physical channel and a psychological connection between the addresser and the addressee, which determines the possibility of “establishing and maintaining communication”.

According to R. Jacobson, each of the identified communication factors corresponds to a special function of the language.

Sharing information means spreading it. By acquiring information, we do not deprive this information of its former owner.

The fixation of information in material carriers has a dual function: to remind the primary owner of the content of information and to serve as a means of transmitting information.

Speech is the materialization of information. However, speech is fleeting and short-range. At present, means of transmitting information over distances, means of fixing information have been invented.

A radical revolution in the development of means of fixing and transmitting information was the transition to the transfer by written means of the plan of expression of linguistic signs.

Communication of people is a symbolic interaction of communicants. In the process of communication, contact is established between people, an exchange of ideas, interests, assessments is carried out, the assimilation of socio-historical experience, and the socialization of the individual take place.

Communication is defined as the process of interconnection and interaction of individuals and their groups, in which there is an exchange of activities, information, experience, abilities, skills, as well as the results of activities. Communication is “one of the necessary and universal conditions for the formation and development of society and the individual” (Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1983). Communication includes mental contact that occurs between individuals and is realized in the process of their mutual perception of each other, as well as the exchange of information through verbal or non-verbal communication and interaction and mutual influence on each other.

Communication- this is a process that flows through many channels: sound, visual, taste, olfactory, tactile (smile, handshake, kiss, smell of perfume, food, etc.). War, duel is anti-communication. The exchange of activity here is aimed at mutual destruction, at the termination of interaction, at the destruction of contact. These types of interaction can be called communication with a minus sign.

For a speech act, the situation is not typical when both the transmission and reception of a message is carried out by one person (for example, in the case of memorization, rehearsals, etc.). Sometimes it is possible for the same person to communicate with himself on the time axis. Sometimes people can, in search of an interlocutor, turn to someone who exists in the mind of the speaker, or to an object, an animal. In this case, it is important for the speaker to express his thoughts in a specific address.

A typical case of communication is the communication of two people. However, tuples (ordered limited sets) communicating are quite frequent and larger than two people. In conditions of free regulated communication, a cortege of two to four people is optimal. In the case of regulated communication (when there is a coordinator, for example, a chairperson, toastmaster, etc.), large tuples of communicating people are also possible (see Suprun 1996)

Biocommunication

Human communication is qualitatively different from animal communication ( biocommunications). Animal communication is based on innate responses to certain stimuli. Animal communication takes place only with a present stimulus, it is instinctive. The ability to communicate is inherited by animals and does not change. Animals have a signaling system by which individuals of the same species or different species can communicate. Animals do not go beyond the first signaling system. They react to the sound signal as a physical stimulus.

The sounds made by animals have no content, no meaning. They don't report anything about the outside world. They give only instructions on which of the possible options for behavior must be chosen at a given moment in order to survive.

No matter how complex the sound combination emitted by one or another animal (for example, the speech of a parrot), it always corresponds in its psychophysiological organization to speech learned by heart. The parrot pronounces the words like a tape recorder, not like a person. The cries emitted by the animal only join the behavior that already exists and without sound.

Do animals understand human speech? For example, a dog seems to understand a person. However, it turns out that the dog does not understand the word in the human sense at all. She does not hear in the word all the sounds that make it up, but reacts to the general sound appearance of the word, to the place of stress and, most importantly, to the intonation with which we speak.

American psychologists, the Gardners, tried to teach the chimpanzee Washoe human language. They taught Washoe sign language for the deaf and dumb. She learned to use 132 signs, and used these signs in situations less and less similar: water, liquid, drink, rain. Washoe learned to use combinations of signs. For example, to get a treat from the refrigerator, she reproduced three signs: “open - key - food”.

The sign communication activity of monkeys developed mainly against a mimic-gestural background, because the larynx of monkeys is poorly adapted to pronouncing sounds. This can be confirmed by the experiments of the Gardner spouses, who taught chimpanzees the language of the deaf and dumb. The chimpanzee Washoe studied 90 figures as signs of objects, actions and events. The deaf-mute acquaintances of the Gardners could accurately recognize up to 70% of her gestures.

The German scientist Keller described his observations of the behavior of chimpanzees. He notes that the intelligence of a chimpanzee is a practical intelligence, it manifests itself only in direct activity. A person plans his activities. His intellect, although connected with practical activity, is not directly woven into it, does not coincide with it. In an adult, practical thinking is combined with theoretical.

By studying the behavior of elephants, researchers using highly sensitive equipment found that animals communicate using "infrasonic language". It turned out that when “talking”, elephants, in addition to ordinary sounds, also use signals at a frequency of 14 hertz, which the human ear does not perceive. With the help of such a language, elephants can communicate at such distances at which even the most powerful roar is powerless. This immediately explains two old mysteries: how males detect a silent female who is out of sight, and how a herd can, without an explicit “audible” command, disciplinedly make a “turn all of a sudden”, take off, stop, leave the area of ​​​​the alleged danger.

Ants have a wide range of innate postures and signals that allow them to transmit information. With the help of postures, ants can “tell” about hunger, food, demand help, subjugate someone, etc. Ants learn quite well and are able to capture logical connections.

K. Firsch's observations of the so-called dances of bees proved that with the help of such dances, bees transmit information about the direction and distance to the food source. Bees can recognize classes of figures regardless of their size and mutual rotation, i.e. generalize figures on the basis of form.

The domestic cat has many vocal cues to express its feelings. Short jerky sounds express a willingness to communicate or a desire to get to know each other. Strangled sounds indicate resentment. High tones, screams speak of aggressiveness, readiness for a fight. Gentle, affectionate intonations are emitted by cat mothers in communication with kittens.

An interesting and very diverse form of sign communication is the ritual communication of animals, which has reached a very wide variety in birds. Courtship postures are very complex and varied, including decorating the nest, “gifting” and so on. Various postures used in ritual communication are informational signals that characterize the emotional mood and intentions of the partners. When studying the “language of birds”, computers come to the aid of the imperfect human ear, allowing ornithologists to instantly identify the song of a bird and decipher the meaning of its message. At present, it was possible to understand many bird musical phrases. For example, the language of thrushes became clear, consisting of 26 basic phrases, which in various combinations make up various musical themes. Scientists have found that birds also have their own dialects. The finch from Luxembourg, for example, does not understand well its counterpart from Central Europe.

The number of signals that animals use is limited; each animal signal conveys a complete message; the signal is inarticulate. The linguistic communication of people is based on the assimilation (spontaneous or conscious) of a particular language, not on innate, but on acquired knowledge. Human language consists of a finite set of language units of different levels that can be combined. Thanks to this, a person can produce an almost unlimited number of statements. A person can talk about the same thing in different ways. The speech of a person is creative. It is conscious in nature and is not only a direct reaction to an immediate stimulus. A person can talk about the past and the future, generalize, imagine. Human speech is not just a communication of any facts, but also an exchange of thoughts about these facts.

24 .Paralinguistics

Human communication can be verbal, i.e. communication using sound or graphic linguistic signs, and non-verbal, carried out in the form of laughter, crying, body movements, facial expressions, gestures, some changes in the sound signal - tempo, timbre, etc. A person uses means of non-verbal communication from the first days of life. In a person who has mastered the art of verbal communication, non-verbal communication accompanies verbal communication.

Means of non-verbal communication do not provide an opportunity to exchange thoughts, abstract concepts, compose texts, etc. All non-linguistic factors only accompany speech, play an auxiliary role in communication.

Non-linguistic factors that accompany human communication and participate in the transmission of information are studied by paralinguistics. The field of paralinguistics is non-verbal (non-verbal) human communication.

One of the sections of paralinguistics is kinesics, which studies gestures, pantomimes, i.e. expressive body movements involved in the communication process.

The attraction of paralinguistic means to participate in communication is dictated not by the inferiority of the language system, but only by external circumstances related to the nature of communication.

The use of paralinguistic means is characteristic of a particular speech activity, but paralinguisms can be studied as typified extralinguistic means used in communication.

Phonation is a paralinguistic phenomenon. Voice timbre, manner of speaking, intonation can tell a lot about a person. The voice is warm and soft, rough and gloomy, frightened and timid, jubilant and confident, malicious and insinuating, firm, triumphant, etc. There are hundreds of shades of voice that express a wide variety of feelings and moods of a person. The area of ​​expressive phonation is not included in the structure of the language, it is superstructure. In each language community, a certain stereotype of prosodic signs of communication is formed, associated with the expression of such aspects of communication as rudeness, delicacy, confidence, doubt, etc. Such stereotypical phonations are the subject of consideration in paralinguistics.

Another branch of paralinguistics is kinesics, body language. Oral communication makes extensive use of the physical manifestations of the speaking subject, aimed at orienting the listener to unambiguously perceive the statement. These means primarily include gestures (body movements) and facial expressions (facial expression of the speaker). Gestures can be international and national in nature. For example, a gesture of solidarity is a raising of a hand clenched into a fist, a gesture of agreement / disagreement is a nod of the head. Gestures include body movements such as shrugging the shoulders, shaking the head, spreading the arms, snapping fingers, waving the hand, etc.

The paralinguistic component of communication can acquire an independent meaning, and can be used without text. Such, for example, are gestures that replace words: bowing, raising the hat, nodding the head, shaking the head, pointing the direction with the hand, etc. Each society (public, social collective) develops its own system of paralinguistic means. They are used in conjunction with actual speech acts. The set of independently functioning paralinguistic signs mainly concerns the following conceptual and communicative circles: greetings and farewells, direction indications, calls to move and indications to stop, expressions of consent-disagreement, prohibition, approval, and some others.

The letter also uses specific paralinguistic signs, such as underscores, brackets, quotation marks, arrows.

25. Speech activity

Speech activity for the most part is an activity for the transfer of information. The essence of speech activity is that it serves the communication of people, the transfer of information. Speech activity has its own specifics in relation to other types of activity. The process of speech comes down to the fact that a certain thought of one person materializes in the form of phrases spoken or written by this person, which are perceived by another person, who extracts from the material shell the ideal content embedded in it by the first participant in communication.

In the process of speech activity, images-meanings are transmitted. Meaning is always the personal attitude of a particular individual to the content to which his activity is currently directed (Tarasov 1977). Meanings are units of the content of the language, and meanings are the units of the content of speech (text). In speech activity, there is a transfer of meanings, not meanings, or rather, the embodiment of meaning in meanings.

The content of speech is not reduced to the combinatorics of linguistic meanings, but is a system of images loaded with a certain meaning. These images are not fixed reflections of objective reality, attached to some linguistic meanings that exist in the form of frozen linguistic forms (signs). These images act as reflections of some specific fragments of reality; each time they add up to a special dynamic system, correlating with different linguistic meanings. But there must be some universal characteristics, otherwise linguistic communication would be impossible.

Speech activity suggests that the subject of activity must have a motive for activity and be aware of the purpose of the activity. The purpose of speech activity is to convey to someone (more precisely, to arouse in the mind of someone) a thought, some kind of image loaded with meaning. This idea is embodied in the word, in linguistic meanings. It is necessary to compare the result with the goal, i.e. see if the result matches the intended goal, i.e. whether the speech action is effective (effective). If the subject feels that the intended goal has not been achieved or has not been fully achieved, he can correct the action. The subject can judge the effectiveness of an action by the reaction to it from the addressee.

So speech action involves:

Goal setting (albeit subordinate to the overall goal of the activity);

Planning (drawing up an internal program);

Implementation of the plan;

Comparison of purpose and result.

Speech activity can occur in parallel with other activities or autonomously.

Like most other actions, speech activity is learned, although the ability to learn it is inherent in a person.

Speech activity is not directed at itself: we speak, as a rule, not just to speak, but in order to convey some information to others. And we usually listen to someone else's speech not just for the pleasure of listening, but in order to get information.

Speech activity can proceed in conjunction with other activities that do not require reflection, concentration. This is usually a mechanical, standard activity, familiar and familiar to the speaker, not distracting him from the conversation, i.e. a process that includes not only the actual speech act as such, but also its mental basis.

Two speech activities are not compatible. It is difficult to read one text and listen to another or speak and listen at the same time, participate in two dialogues at the same time. Mental activity is possible together with speech, when both of these activities proceed with very little stress.

Speech activity often occurs in conjunction with the movements of the hands, eyes, and various body movements, which is the paralinguistic component of speech activity.

Speech Component communication is its most important component. But this should not negate or belittle the importance of other components of communication. extremely important video sequence. We really miss the visual channel, for example, when talking on the phone.

The more complete the contact, the more open to each other those who communicate, the more emotional and rational prerequisites for communication they have, the more complete and exciting is the “luxury of human communication” (in the words of Antoine de Saint-Exupery). In the polyphonic orchestra of communication, speech communication plays the part of the first violin (Suprun 1996). It occupies such an indisputably leading role that sometimes communication is understood as its speech manifestation. When communication occurs in an ensemble of various means, including the speech form, it is on it that the most significant part of intersubjective interaction falls. The speech component of communication is considered to be the most important.

Speech activity is an object of study of the theory of speech activity, or psycholinguistics.

The minimum implementation of verbal communication (communication) is speech act. The totality of speech acts constitutes speech activity. In the process of a speech act, a speech (verbal) message is transmitted from one or more participants in communication to another or other participants in communication.

The communicative nature of the speech act suggests its two-way nature. A speech act has two sides: the production and reception of a speech message. Accordingly, we can talk about two participants in a speech act: a speaker and a listener, a writer and a reader, an addresser and an addressee. The addressee (speaker, writer) produces a speech message and transmits it to the addressee (listener, reader), who receives (perceives) it and understands it. The first encodes, encrypts, and the second decodes, decrypts the message; the first turns the idea of ​​the message into a speech chain, and the second extracts meaning from it.

In a speech act, the roles of the speaker and listener (addresser and addressee) are usually inconsistent. The addresser becomes the addressee and the addressee becomes the addressee. In some cases, one of the speakers is dominated by the role of the speaker, while the other is the listener. The more democratic the relations in a given society, in a given collective, between given participants in a speech act, the more natural is the change of roles and the more often it occurs (see Suprun 1996).

Speech acts are studied within the framework of the theory of speech acts developed by J. Austin, J. Searle and P. Strawson. The theory of speech acts proceeds from the fact that the main unit of communication is not a sentence or any other expression, but the performance of a certain kind of activity: statements, requests, thanks, apologies, etc.

The speech act is presented within the framework of the theory of speech acts as consisting of three links:

locution act - the act of utterance;

Illocutionary act - manifestation of the purpose of the statement;

Perlocution act - recognition of communicative intention, intention, addressee and his reaction to the speech act of the speaker.

The illocutionary force of an utterance can sometimes be expressed by an illocutionary verb, for example: I ask you to do it. Verb I beg expresses the illocutionary force of the request.

Statements containing illocutionary predicates of the type I swear, I promise, I declare etc., are called performative utterances. They kind of create a situation. No utterance I promise, there can be no act of promise. Such statements do not describe the situation, but express the intention of the speaker. Such predicates have performative power only if they are used in the 1st person singular. number, present tense, i.e. if they are related to the I-speaker. statement He promised to do it- does not have the performative power of a promise, it is a statement of the fact that a promise was accepted by some other person.

Some statements have illocutionary ambiguity. Such expressions are used in indirect speech acts which are understood as such speech acts that are expressed by language structures intended for a different type of speech acts, for example: Could you tell me how to get to the station? Naturally, the speaker does not expect an answer: I can. The speech act has the power of a polite request, although it has the form of a question. The addressee correctly establishes the illocutionary force of the utterance and adequately responds to the utterance as to a request.