Front line July 1943 events. The Battle of Kursk is a fundamental turning point in the Great Patriotic and World War II

The horseshoe-shaped ledge of the Eastern (Soviet-German) front of the Second World War in the Kursk region was formed during the winter-spring campaign of 1942-1943. in connection with the defeat of the German troops at Stalingrad, the major Soviet offensive from Voronezh to Kharkov and the subsequent successful counter-offensive of Army Group South under the command of Field Marshal Erich Manstein.

As a result of a heavy defeat near Stalingrad in late 1942 - early 1943. The German Eastern Front was under strong pressure from the Soviet army. While the Soviet Don Front in January-February 1943 liquidated the encircled Stalingrad grouping of the enemy, a number of offensive operations of the Red Army were carried out in other sectors of the Soviet-German front, aimed at developing the strategic initiative captured by the Russians. The Soviet high command planned to launch a general offensive along the entire front, conducting a series of offensive operations coordinated with each other in terms of goals and time. Accordingly, on the southern wing of the front, the following were carried out: the Rostov operation - from January 1 to February 18; Nalchik-Stavropol - from January 3 to February 4; liquidation of the Stalingrad group - from January 10 to February 2; Krasnodar-Novorossiysk operation - from January 11 (ended only in May). The center carried out: Ostrogozhsk-Rossosh operation - from January 13 to 27; Voronezhsko-Kastornenskaya - from January 24 to February 2. On the northern wing, the following activities were carried out: breaking through the blockade of Leningrad - from January 12 to 18; liquidation of the Demyansk bridgehead of the German troops - from February 15 to 28. As you can see, all operations were organized in the second half of the winter military campaign of 1942-1943 in order to paralyze the German army with a whole series of simultaneous and successive attacks on several main directions at once.

During the Voronezh-Kastornoe and Ostrogozh-Rossosh offensive operations, the 2nd German and 2nd Hungarian armies, the German 24th Panzer Corps and the Italian Alpine Corps of the 8th Italian Army, which held the front, were partially surrounded and destroyed, partially driven back to the west. Army Group "B" in the strip between Army Groups "Don" and "Center". As a result, in the defense of army groups "B" and "Don" in the Kursk and Kharkov directions, a gap was formed with a length of 350 - 400 kilometers from Voronezh to Voroshilovgrad, poorly covered by troops. Building on their success, the armies of the Voronezh and Southwestern fronts switched to the Kharkov and Millerovo-Voroshilovgrad offensive operations. The armies of the Voronezh Front took Kursk on February 8, Belgorod on February 9, captured Kharkov on February 16, and reached Rylsk, Lebedin and Opishna on the left flank. On the right flank of the Voronezh Front, the 13th Army of the Bryansk Front, which joined the operation on February 7, drove the Germans out of the city of Fatezh. The formations of the mobile group of troops of the Southwestern Front on February 8 crossed the Seversky Donets River southeast of Kharkov and continued their offensive to the crossings across the Dnieper, on February 20 reaching the approaches to Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye, which created a threat of encirclement of the German Army Group "South" (German: Heeresgruppe "Sud", formed on February 13, 1943 from the Army Group "Don", German Heeresgruppe "Don"). It seemed that on the Day of the Red Army on February 23, the Russians would celebrate another catastrophic defeat of the Germans in the East. However, the commander of Army Group South, Field Marshal Erich Manstein, prepared and successfully carried out a counterattack (a series of concentric attacks on the flanks of the advancing enemy), which made it possible, according to German data, to defeat and partially destroy eight corps from February 19 to March 5, three brigades and seven rifle divisions of the Voronezh and Southwestern fronts - almost 35,000 Soviet soldiers were killed, more than 9,000 were captured, not counting the loss of about 700 tanks and 650 guns. On March 6, the counterattack turned into a full-scale counteroffensive, as a result of which the irretrievable casualties of the troops of the Voronezh and Southwestern fronts in the period from March 4 to March 25, 1943, during the Kharkov defensive operation, according to Soviet historiography, amounted to more than 45 thousand people, total - more than 80 thousand, and 322 tanks, 3,185 guns and mortars were also lost. On March 16 and 18, German troops recaptured Kharkov and Belgorod and reached approximately the front line in this area, which they occupied in the spring of 1942. Thus, the Germans quite adequately responded to the defeat at Stalingrad and seized the strategic initiative, since they imposed their will on the enemy and created conditions that limited his ability to switch to active operations in the strategic direction, the theater of operations and on the entire front as a whole for a long period. The Soviet command had to respond to the enemy counteroffensive, engage strategic reserves to repel it and temporarily postpone their far-reaching offensive plans (for example, in mid-March 1943, the large-scale offensive of the Bryansk, Western and newly organized Central Fronts was stopped, and the 21 The Central Front had to be transferred to the Voronezh Front to strengthen its defense in the Oboyan area; in the period from March 9 to April 4, the 1st Tank Army was transferred to the Oboyan direction from the Leningrad Front, which took part in the front-line operation to lift the blockade of Leningrad).

The surname Manstein (German Manstein), adopted by the nee Erich Lewinsky after adoption by relatives (on the maternal side, Manstein belonged to the Sperling family, from which many Swedish and German military leaders came from, who fought with the Russians, in particular, Colonels Kaspar and Jacob Sperling died during the Northern War in Ukraine in the winter of 1709 during the storming of the Veprik fortress by the Swedes, and their relative Countess Elena Shperling, wife of the commandant of the Narva fortress General Henning Horn (Henning Horn), died during the Russian siege of Narva in the summer of 1704), literally translated from German means "stone man" or "stone man". This definition perfectly reflects the self-consciousness and the corresponding style of behavior of this commander, whose appearance shows a schizotymic personality type. An emotionally cold analyst, laconic, thinking in abstract categories, apparently internally considering himself the "cornerstone" on which the German army is based, very domineering and ambitious, seeking appointment to the post of Commander-in-Chief of the Eastern Front, Manstein tried to appear close to the soldiers, but many the front-line soldiers who communicated with him understood that they were only material for the implementation of his ambitious strategic and operational-tactical plans. This is well shown in the work of V. Ninov, dedicated to the Battle of Korsun-Shevchenkovsky, where Manstein refused to provide further assistance to the encircled group of German troops, when the analysis showed the futility of further efforts, although the encircled themselves continued to make attempts to break out of the "cauldron".

Belonging to a hereditary military family, as well as kinship with Jews, which was not even hidden by Manstein (on the paternal side of the Lewinsky family, German Lewinsky), suggest a certain genetic predisposition - a combinatorial style of thinking combined with intuition in the military sphere (Manstein repeatedly foresaw the actions of his opponents), which determined his success as a military leader. In any case, analytical qualities alone would not be enough to advance from among the numerous officers trained by the German General Staff.

In his memoirs, Manstein often criticizes the attempts of the Commander-in-Chief (German: Fieldherr) of the German armed forces, Adolf Hitler, to control the course of hostilities and indicates that he firmly defended his point of view before the Fuhrer on all issues related to the command of his subordinate troops. However, other evidence is also known. General Heinz (Heinz) Guderian (Heinz Guderian) noted that under Hitler, Manstein was often "unlucky", he was "not up to par." Captain Winrich Behr, officer of the General Staff of the German Army, recalls the statements of his friend, Colonel Bernhard Klamroth (Bernhard Klamroth, participant in the conspiracy against Hitler in July 1944, executed. - P. B.), who advised him to be careful with Manstein, since he contradicts Hitler only in words, but in fact he will carry out any of his orders. From the point of view of some historians, Manstein sharply criticized the German military strategy only in private conversations (at home he allowed himself to defiantly teach his dachshund dog to imitate the National Socialist salute. - P. B.), but in reality he was so in awe of the personality of Adolf Hitler that he was very shy and even stuttered in his presence. Be that as it may, in the spring of 1944, having decided to remove Manstein from command of Army Group South, Hitler rewarded him and parted with the field marshal quite amicably, and in October of the same year, with the assistance of General Heinz Guderian, Manstein was given permission to acquire ownership estates.

From the point of view of the current psychological state of the field marshal on the eve of the Battle of Kursk, it is interesting to report about the appearance of signs of cataract in him, and not yet explained by age, the development of which the German doctors tried to prevent in April 1943 by removing Manstein's tonsils (the operation to remove the cataract of the right eye was made to him a year later, immediately after being removed from command). Some authors who have devoted their research to the theoretical background and philosophy of the disease believe that the symptoms of a particular disease are a form of physical expression of mental conflicts and, therefore, are able to highlight the patient's personality problems. According to this view, the most common symptoms of illness must be learned to be understood and interpreted as forms of expression of certain mental problems. Accordingly, a cataract, which leads to loss of visual acuity, expresses the patient's desire to distance himself from the outside world, to hide it behind a cloudy veil in order to see as little as possible, since the future seems dangerous and bleak.

Apparently, in the spring of 1943, Manstein was in a state of deep depression, which even affected his physical health and was caused by severe stress associated with the nervous tension that the field marshal had experienced since December 1942. Manstein's propensity for depression is also confirmed by some personal evidence, according to which he preferred to see optimistic people in his business environment - for example, such were the chief of staff of Army Group South, General Theodor Busse, and the chief of staff of the 6th Army, General Walter Wenck (Walter Wenck ). This was all the more important because, according to R. Paget (Reginald Paget) - the English lawyer Erich Manstein - the field marshal hated paperwork and rarely read the documents that were delivered to him, preferring to navigate their content according to the oral reports of competent officers.

For four months, Manstein was responsible for holding the front of Army Group Don, tried to organize the release of the encircled Stalingrad group, actually ensured the withdrawal of most of the troops of Army Group A from the Caucasus, prepared and carried out a successful counterattack against the Red Army. At the same time, additional nervous forces were taken away by the need to constantly hold the mask of the “stone man”. Given his age - in November 1942, Manstein turned 55 years old - he needed a long recovery period, which, however, the field marshal did not receive, being forced to immediately take part in the preparation of Operation Citadel.

Some interested persons, for example, the senior translator of the German Foreign Office (in the rank of envoy) Paul Schmidt (Paul-Karl Schmidt), who worked with Adolf Hitler and Joachim Ribbentrop, and after the war became a historian and journalist, writing under the pseudonym Paul Karel (Karell, Paul Karell), believe that the "Manstein counterattack" in February - March 1943, if it developed, could lead to a turning point in the course of the entire war. However, a more sober assessment shows that the Germans had neither the strength nor the time to even reach Kursk before the spring thaw. According to some reports, the total irretrievable losses of the German army on all fronts in February-March 1943 exceeded 100 thousand people and 2,800 tanks and self-propelled artillery mounts (hereinafter referred to as self-propelled guns), of which a significant part falls on the Eastern Front (according to the integral estimate ~ 75% losses; although strong battles took place in North Africa since February 14, 1943, however, the number of tanks in German units in Libya on February 10 was 408 vehicles, and at the same time there was one tank division and several separate tank battalions in Tunisia , therefore, in total, there were no more than 600 - 700 vehicles in this theater of operations), and here - for the losses of the troops of Army Group South, incurred during counterattacks and the subsequent counteroffensive.

The formations involved in these operations were seriously weakened and needed to be replenished. Thus, the losses of three divisions of the 1st SS Panzer Corps, transferred to the Eastern Front from France in January-February 1943 (German I SS-Panzerkorps, from April 1943 - the 2nd SS Panzer Corps), in less than two months amounted to 11.5 thousand soldiers and officers killed and wounded. According to the intelligence department of the headquarters of the Voronezh Front, the divisions of this corps "Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler" (German 1 SS-Panzer-Division "Leibstandarte Schutzstafel Adolf Hitler") and "Reich" (German 2 SS-Panzer-Division "Das Reich" ) in January-March lost up to 30% of the personnel, and the division "Dead Head" (German 3 SS-Panzer-Division "Totenkopf") in February-March (the main forces of the division took part in the hostilities from February 22) - up to 35% of personnel and materiel. After the March battles for Kharkov, only 14 combat-ready tanks remained in parts of the SS Life Standard Adolf Hitler division, and the loss of personnel exceeded 4.5 thousand people.

On the other hand, when trying to advance on Oboyan, the German 48th Panzer Corps, the 1st SS Panzer Corps and the motorized division "Gross Deutschland" (German: "Gross Deutschland") collided on the line of the Belgorod heights with units being transferred here and formations of newly equipped and equipped with the Soviet 64th, 21st and 1st Tank Armies, as well as the 3rd Guards Tank Corps allocated for their reinforcement (from the 5th Guards Tank Army). By that time, the 69th Army of the Voronezh Front, having left Belgorod, entrenched itself on the left bank of the Seversky Donets, and the 40th Army retreated north west of Belgorod, in the general direction of Gotnya, so that a significant gap formed in the Belgorod-Kursk direction in the front line . However, the Russians preempted the Germans by quickly transferring reserves to the threatened direction. In the period from 18 to 21 March, formations of the 21st Army, reinforced by the 3rd Guards Kotelnikovsky Tank Corps, advanced south of Oboyan and went on the defensive at the line of Dmitrievka, Prirechnoye, Berezov, Shopino, blocking the main highway to Kursk (3rd Guards Tank the corps already deployed on March 14 at the turn of Tomarovka - Kalinin - Middle); On March 18, the 1st Panzer Army passed through Kursk, and on March 23, the main forces made a 40-kilometer march to the Oboyan area after unloading 25 km south of Kursk; The 64th Army deployed on the eastern bank of the Seversky Donets River near Belgorod by March 23, strengthening the defenses of the 69th Army already there. The fighting in the Oboyan direction began on March 20 and continued until the 27th, without success for the German troops, after which the front line on the northern flank of Army Group South stabilized at the line of Gaponovo, Trefilovka, Belgorod, Volchansk, where the 4th Panzer Army took up positions and the newly formed task force "Kempf" (German: Armee-Abteilung "Kempf"), consisting of the 11th, 42nd and 52nd army corps, the 3rd and 48th tank corps, as well as the 2nd tank body CC (see the picture). From the Soviet side, the 21st, 38th, 40th and 64th armies of the Voronezh Front were deployed in this sector in the first echelon, and the 1st tank and 69th armies in the second echelon. This is how the southern face of the Kursk ledge was formed.

At the same time, the Army Group Center (German: Heeresgruppe "Mitte") could not provide any assistance to the South Group with a strike from the north or west, because it repelled the advance of the Soviet troops and did not have additional forces or reserves. Based on the results of the offensive operations of the Soviet troops in January 1943, taking into account the imminent surrender of the Stalingrad enemy grouping, at the end of January, the Soviet Supreme High Command and the General Staff of the Red Army developed a plan for a number of interrelated operations in the central and northwestern directions. Five fronts were to take part in these operations: the North-Western, Kalinin, Western, Bryansk, as well as the newly created Central. The idea of ​​the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command was to defeat the 2nd German Panzer Army in the Orel region with the forces of the Bryansk and the left wing of the Western Fronts; with the arrival of the troops of the Central Front, develop an offensive through Bryansk to Smolensk and go to the rear of the Rzhev-Vyazma grouping of the enemy; in cooperation with the Kalinin and Western Fronts, destroy the main forces of Army Group Center; encircle and destroy the enemy grouping in the Demyansk region with the troops of the North-Western Front and ensure the exit of the mobile front group to the rear of the enemy acting against the Leningrad and Volkhov fronts. The German command preempted the implementation of this plan, since at the same time - at the end of January - Hitler decided to withdraw troops from the Rzhev-Vyazma and Demyansk bridgeheads. However, when the Stalingrad grouping of German troops capitulated on February 2, 1943, the command of the Army Group Center still planned to withdraw from the Rzhev-Vyazma bridgehead the formations of the 9th and 4th armies, which could be used to form reserves, strengthen defenses and counterattacks against advancing enemy. In particular, the withdrawal of divisions of the 9th Army from the front began in March, and their redeployment from Smolensk to the Bryansk region took more than 18 days, fully completed only in early April. At the same time, the Soviet command immediately used the opportunity to transfer the troops of the Don Front to the central direction. On February 5, 1943, the Central Front was formed by the Stavka directive, consisting of the 21st, 65th, 70th, 2nd tank and 16th air armies (2nd tank and 70th armies from the Stavka reserve), commander who was appointed General Konstantin Rokossovsky, and the field administration of the Don Front was renamed the field administration of the Central Front. On the night of February 6, the Headquarters set him the task of moving to the Dolgoye, Yelets, Livny area by February 12, deploying his troops between the Bryansk and Voronezh fronts at the Kursk-Fatezh line, and from the 15th, advancing in the direction of Sevsk, Bryansk, and then Roslavl , Smolensk. According to the plan of the operation prepared by the Operational Directorate of the General Staff, the defenses of Army Group Center were to break through the Western and Bryansk Fronts, and the troops of the Central Front were to use their successes to capture Roslavl, Smolensk and part of the Orsha forces, creating a situation for the enemy close to environment. To strengthen the Central Front and create mobile strike groups, the 2nd Tank Army and the 2nd Guards Cavalry Corps, two separate tank regiments and three ski-rifle brigades were transferred from the reserve to it.

The troops of the Bryansk Front, which went on the offensive on February 12, 1943, found themselves tied up in heavy fighting on the enemy’s positional defense prepared in advance and did not achieve significant success. The maximum advance in the zone of the 13th and 48th armies of the Bryansk Front, which attacked the right flank of the enemy's 2nd Panzer Army, trying to bypass Orel from the south and southeast, amounted to 30 kilometers. The 61st and 3rd Armies, advancing on Orel from the north (through Bolkhov) and the east, advanced even less. By February 24, the offensive of the Bryansk Front was finally stopped at the Novosil - Maloarkhangelsk - Rozhdestvenskoye line. On the Western Front, the 16th Army, reinforced by the 9th Tank Corps, with the support of one rifle division of the 10th Army, on February 22 went on the offensive through Zhizdra to Bryansk, towards the troops of the 13th Army of the Bryansk Front, but was stopped after breaking through the first defensive stripes on the left flank of the 2nd German Panzer Army, advancing 13 kilometers (according to Marshal of the USSR Ivan Bagramyan, who then commanded the 16th Army, the reason for the failure of the Zhizdrinskaya operation was the lack of tactical surprise, as well as the fact that the commander of the Western Front, General Konev twice forbade him to bring the 9th Panzer Corps into the gap). Now the result of the battle for each of the parties began to be determined by the speed of concentration of reserves in the main directions, and the Soviet side was hindered by a considerable distance (from Stalingrad to Kursk), and the German side had to carry out a complex maneuver, withdrawing troops from the Rzhev-Vyazma bridgehead under pressure from the enemy. The Germans were able to withdraw troops in difficult conditions and managed to regroup faster, which should be regarded as a major failure of the command of the Kalinin and Western fronts (the commanders, Generals Maxim Purkaev and Ivan Konev, were relieved of command in March 1943, after which Purkaev was appointed commander in April Far Eastern Front, and Konev was initially transferred to a secondary direction - the commander of the North-Western Front instead of Marshal Semyon Timoshenko (according to Marshal Georgy Zhukov - at his suggestion), and in June he received the post of commander of the Steppe Military District). Due to the significant difficulties of a transport nature that arose during the transfer of troops from near Stalingrad (Konstantin Rokossovsky notes that the front had the only single-track railway at its disposal, and the supplied trains were not adapted for transporting people and horses, but measures to speed up the transfer of troops were received by employees of the state security organs, due to which the traffic schedule was completely disrupted, units and formations were mixed together and unloaded in places for other purposes), the start of the offensive of the Central Front was postponed from February 15 to February 24. Thanks to this, the German command promptly brought into battle in the Central Front a number of divisions of the 4th Army that had arrived in the Bryansk region, the order to withdraw which was given on February 17, and then the 9th Army, which began to withdraw on March 1.

Upon completion of the concentration of the main part of the troops of the Central Front, on February 26 they launched an offensive in the Bryansk direction with the forces of the 65th and 2nd tank armies, as well as the cavalry rifle group (21st and 70th armies were still on the march to the area concentration east of the city of Livny). The enemy put up stubborn and organized resistance, outpacing the Soviet troops in regrouping and deploying forces in threatened directions. The large separation of the rear units and bases from the concentration areas made it difficult to provide the armies of the Central Front with the main supplies, the almost complete absence of road and transport units limited the ability to maneuver forces and means. As a result, the 65th combined-arms and 2nd tank armies achieved limited success, pushing the enemy back 30-60 kilometers by March 6, to Komarichi, Lyutezh and Seredina-Buda. The entry into battle of the 70th Army, deployed by March 7 at the junction of the Central and Bryansk fronts in the Khalzevo, Trofimovka, Ferezevo, Bryantsevo sector, did not change the situation, since the army went on the offensive directly from the march, understaffed with technical means, without the necessary artillery support of their actions, the command staff did not have combat experience - battle control and communications were not organized, rifle formations attacked on the move, in parts, there was no interaction within the combat formations of infantry units, the road service worked poorly - the supply of supplies and the evacuation of the wounded were almost absent (already On March 18, the army was forced to go on the defensive, therefore, as a result of the operation, the headquarters of the 70th Army was reinforced with experienced officers, and the commander, General German Tarasov, was removed from his post). Participation in the offensive of the 21st Army did not take place, since, by order of the Headquarters, it was transferred to the Voronezh Front to strengthen the Oboyan direction. Significant aviation forces were redirected to the same direction.

However, the cavalry rifle group under the command of General Vladimir Kryukov, formed on the basis of the 2nd Guards Cavalry Corps (3rd and 4th Guards Cavalry Divisions and corps units), reinforced by the 28th and 30th Ski Rifle Brigades and a separate tank regiment, successfully advanced on the left flank of the front in the direction of Starodub, Novozybkov, Mogilev, captured the city of Sevsk on March 2, and then advanced detachments reached the Desna River north of the city of Novgorod-Seversky, breaking through 100-120 kilometers to the west. As a result of this breakthrough (the so-called "Sevsky Raid"), a real threat arose for the communications of Army Group Center, but it turned out to be impossible to develop or consolidate success due to the lack of mobile reserves. Despite the orders of Rokossovsky, General Kryukov did not take timely measures to consolidate and defend the achieved lines when his group was counterattacked by the enemy from the flanks. By March 12, the front of the cavalry rifle group stretched along an arc 150 kilometers long, the tanks were without fuel, the cavalrymen had no fodder, while the enemy struck from the north and south on the flanks with six tank and infantry divisions, hoping to completely cut off the cavalry corps. Kryukov's group began to retreat to the east, to Sevsk. According to Soviet data, a total of nine German divisions were sent against the cavalry rifle group, which by March 20 threw back the Soviet formations that had broken through and surrounded their advanced units west of Sevsk. From the front, the cavalry rifle group was held by units of the 137th Infantry Division, the 102nd and 108th Infantry Divisions of the 8th Hungarian Army Corps and the military formations of the "Special Lokotsky District" - the so-called "Kaminsky Brigade", and the cavalry attacked from the flanks SS division (later the 8th SS Cavalry Division "Florian Geyer", German 8 SS-Kavallerie-Division "Florian Geyer"), 72nd Infantry and 9th Panzer Divisions of the 9th Army (from the north); 4th Panzer, 340th and 327th Infantry Divisions (from the south).

In order to repel the counterattack of the German troops, the command of the Central Front was forced to stop the offensive and deploy the 65th Army on a wide front along the eastern bank of the Sev River. Having suffered heavy losses, parts of the cavalry rifle group fought for Sevsk until March 27, when they were finally driven out of the city, but managed to retreat and escaped from the encirclement through the Sev River valley thanks to help from the newly arrived 7th Far Eastern Cavalry Division, troops 65th and 2nd Tank Armies (11th Separate Guards Tank Brigade). The losses of the cavalry rifle group during the "Sevsky raid" amounted to up to 15 thousand soldiers and officers, so the 2nd Guards Cavalry Corps had to be withdrawn to the rear for reorganization, and to find out the reasons for the unsuccessful operation, the commission of the Military Council of the Central Front worked, but the commander front, General Rokossovsky decided not to bring General Kryukov and other officers of the corps to court. On March 21, the 48th, 65th, 70th and 2nd tank armies of the Central Front went on the defensive along the line of Mtsensk, Novosil, Sevsk, Rylsk, forming the northern face of the Kursk salient, and the 13th and the 60th Army of the Bryansk and Voronezh fronts, transferred along with the areas they occupied. The troops of the Army Group "Center" were deployed against the Central Front, consisting of the 7th and 13th army corps of the 2nd army, the 20th and 23rd army and 46th tank corps of the 9th army, as well as part of the forces of 35 th Army Corps of the 2nd Tank Army (see picture).

Thus, after the completion of the spring operations of 1943, the Eastern Front near Kursk stabilized along the line: Chernyshino, Mtsensk, Maloarkhangelsk, south of Dmitrovsk-Orlovsky, east of Sevsk, Rylsk, Sumy, north of Tomarovka and Belgorod, and further south along the banks of the Seversky Donets River. The area of ​​penetration of the Soviet troops at the junction of Army Groups "Center" and "South", called the German command "Kursk Balcony", remained a problem area, which went into the location of the Germans by 150 km (increasing the total length of the positions by almost 500 km) and interrupted line communications between the indicated army groups, disrupting the connectivity of the front and creating the threat of deep attacks on their flanks and rear. Therefore, the Kursk ledge, turned into a powerful bridgehead, deeply cut into the enemy's defenses, was of exceptionally important strategic importance for the Red Army. The large groupings of Soviet troops concentrated here not only fettered the enemy's Oryol and Belgorod-Kharkov groupings, but also posed a constant and very real danger to them. The troops of the Central Front, which occupied the northern part of the Kursk salient, had the ability to deliver concentric strikes against the rear and flanks of the Oryol group of Germans, acting together with the troops of the Bryansk Front and the left wing of the Western Front. A similar opportunity was created for the troops of the Voronezh Front, which could strike from the north and east on the flanks and rear of the Belgorod-Kharkov enemy grouping. Accordingly, the holding of the Kursk ledge provided the Soviet side with favorable conditions for launching an offensive in order to defeat the most important enemy groupings and develop operations on the territory of Ukraine and Belarus.

On the other hand, the defeat at Stalingrad, the stage of forced defense associated with this and the subsequent mastery of the strategic initiative in March 1943 again raised the question of the goals, objectives, methods and means of continuing the war against the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (hereinafter - the USSR) before the German command.

From the book Fights at Lake Balaton. January–March 1945 author Kolomiets Maxim Viktorovich

From the book The Battle for Donbass [Mius Front, 1941–1943] author Zhirokhov Mikhail Alexandrovich

The general situation on the Soviet-German front and the plans of the parties by the beginning of 1943 The Battle of Stalingrad, which began on November 19, 1942, radically changed the entire course of hostilities on the Soviet-German front. It is well known that already on November 23

From the book All fortified areas and defensive lines of World War II author Runov Valentin Alexandrovich

Chapter 4 Breakthrough of the Mius Front in the Summer of 1943

From the book Tenth IAS Flotilla (with illustration) author Borghese Valerio

Fortified areas of the southern wing of the Soviet-German front South of the 26th was defended by the 12th Army of the Kyiv Special Military District (commander - Major General P.G. Ponedelin, member of the Military Council - Brigadier Commissar I.P. Kulikov, chief of staff - General Major B.I.

From the book The Largest Tank Battle of the Great Patriotic War. Battle for the Eagle the author Shchekotikhin Egor

Chapter VII The first success of assault means. Victory at Souda Bay in March 1941 Greece enters the war. Hiking to Santi Quaranta and Corfu. Organization of a British naval base in Souda (Crete). The boats are based on Beros. Futile attempts in January and February. Finally

From the book The Tragedy of Fidelity. Memoirs of a German tanker. 1943–1945 author Tike Wilhelm

OREL IS THE STRATEGIC CENTER OF THE SOVIET-GERMAN FRONT It is known that in accordance with the plan "Barbarossa" (German attack on the Soviet Union), the Oryol region came under attack from the left flank of the German troops of the Army Group "Center", the tip of which was directed

From the book 14th Panzer Division. 1940-1945 author Grams Rolf

Chapter 1. Formation of the 3rd (German) SS Panzer Corps The 3rd (German) SS Panzer Corps was created in accordance with the order of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of March 30, 1943. Huge losses in manpower suffered by our troops during the war

From the book Crimea: battle of special forces author Kolontaev Konstantin Vladimirovich

From the book Border Troops of Russia in Wars and Armed Conflicts of the 20th Century. author History Team of authors --

Chapter 5. Actions of the reconnaissance detachment of the Black Sea Fleet in January - May 1942

From the book Battle of Kursk, which we started author Bukeikhanov Petr Evgenievich

Chapter 10. Creation in March 1944 of the underwater special forces of the Black Sea Fleet (detachment of combat swimmers)

From the book Stalingrad author Lagodsky Sergey Alexandrovich

Chapter 6. Creation and combat activity of the "Separate paratrooper battalion of the Air Force of the Black Sea Fleet in May 1943 - January 1944

From the author's book

Chapter 6

From the author's book

3. BORDER TROOPS IN COMBAT ACTIONS ON THE SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN SECTIONS OF THE SOVIET-GERMAN FRONT

From the author's book

§ 1.2.3. Formation of the operational plan for the spring-summer campaign of 1943 in the East - the concept of Operation Citadel, its discussion and final approval When Hitler decided to deliver a preemptive strike, questions arose before the German command about

From the author's book

§ 1.2.4. The validity of the decision to conduct Operation Citadel due to the delays in the start of the offensive. Changes in the positions of the parties in March-June 1943

From the author's book

Chapter One ON THE FRONT LINE By the beginning of the Battle of Stalingrad, the head of the UNKVD in the Stalingrad region was the 34-year-old senior major of state security Alexander Ivanovich Voronin. It was not only a professional Chekist, but also a well-trained military leader: in

Military operations in autumn 1943

By September 1943, the front of the Eastern Army was basically a solid line, and only one gap remained open between Army Groups South and Center. However, the strength of the newly created front left much to be desired. There were no significant reserves. The divisions were worn out in battle, their numbers and weapons indicated that they would not be able to withstand new severe tests. On huge sectors of the front, the positions were poorly equipped, the stretching of the front of individual formations did not allow the Germans to create a sufficient operational density of troops even in the main defense zone, not to mention the construction of a deeply echeloned and well-equipped defense system. The problem of the number of formations, which ran like a red thread through the entire Eastern campaign, began to become more and more acute. It became quite obvious that Hitler had set a task for the armed forces in the East that was beyond their power.

Under such conditions, the conclusion suggested itself that it was necessary once again before the start of a new Russian offensive to withdraw troops in an organized manner and occupy the least extended and well-prepared line of defense. First of all, it was necessary to withdraw troops from the Crimea, as well as from the arc protruding to the east along the Dnieper south of Kyiv. This was the only way to achieve some reduction in the front of individual formations and create at least a minimum of reserves. But Hitler did not agree to this for the political and economic reasons already partially indicated above. Although Hitler was constantly up to date with accurate reports and reports and knew how many people and weapons were in individual divisions, he overestimated their ability to resist, as well as underestimated the offensive capabilities of the Russians. In addition, he believed that such a wide water barrier as the Dnieper could be successfully defended even with insignificant forces.

On October 7, the Russians, having previously captured a small bridgehead on the right bank of the Dnieper in the area south of Kyiv, which the Germans failed to liquidate, went on the offensive. They concentrated their main effort at first between Kremenchug and Dnepropetrovsk, as well as in the area of ​​Zaporozhye and Melitopol. After heavy fighting, during which the German troops and command, realizing the decisive importance of holding the occupied lines for the entire Eastern campaign, strained all their forces and stubbornly repulsed the onslaught of superior Russian forces, the latter managed to break through the front of the 6th Army in the Melitopol region on October 23. They threw back the army behind the Dnieper in its lower reaches and cut off the Crimea, blocking the Perekop isthmus. At the same time, they landed in the eastern part of the Crimea on the Kerch Peninsula. However, both near Perekop and on the Kerch Peninsula, the advance of Russian troops was temporarily stopped. The Crimean peninsula continued to remain in the hands of the Germans.

On the front of the 1st Panzer Army, which took place in the sector from Chigorin to Nikopol, the Russians, having failed in an attempt to eliminate the German bridgehead in the Zaporozhye region, crossed the Dnieper between Dnepropetrovsk and Kremenchug and broke through the defenses of the German troops along the Dnieper on a wide front. With forces of up to about 100 divisions, including many tank units and formations, they struck in a westerly direction and reached Krivoy Rog. Army Group A, whose right wing was still holding the defense along the Dnieper in its lower reaches, turned around from Nikopol with its front to the west. Now the front line passed through Krivoy Rog and west of Kirovograd. Army Group South, having pulled back the troops of the right wing of the 8th Army after the 1st Panzer Army, at first continued to hold the old positions in the zone of this army. As a result, a new protrusion of the front was formed here, strongly elongated to the east.

A critical situation also developed on the front of the 4th Panzer Army, which operated as part of Army Group South. This army, in the course of bloody battles that lasted almost four weeks, repulsed all the attacks of the enemy, who was trying to make a breakthrough in the Kyiv region. Only in a few sectors did the enemy manage to slightly push her troops. But after these battles, the army was bled and unable to continue resistance.

When, on November 3, the Russians, with up to 50 divisions, launched a decisive offensive from the bridgeheads they had captured on the right bank of the Dnieper, the 4th Panzer Army was unable to offer sufficient resistance to the Russian strike force. Kyiv fell on November 6th. The front of the German troops was broken, and the Russian tank and motorized units, almost without resistance, rushed to the west. On November 11, the advanced units of the advancing Russian troops approached Zhitomir.

At the same time, the Russians also went on the offensive on the front of the 2nd Army, which operated on the right flank of Army Group Center. Having struck south and north of Gomel, the Russians pushed the army back to the northwest. As a result, the gap that existed between the army groups widened even further. A desperate situation arose. If the Russians now began to build on the success they had achieved, then the fate of Army Groups "A" and "South", and at the same time the fate of the entire Eastern Front, would be finally decided. The situation could only be saved by striking the left flank of the Russian troops that had broken through. Having gathered all the forces that could be withdrawn from other sectors of the front, replacing them with temporary, hastily formed units from vacationers, as well as consolidated units of rear services, etc., and transferring here individual units from other theaters of military operations, the Germans managed to to create in the area between Fastov and Zhytomyr the grouping necessary to carry out this task. This strike force launched a counteroffensive against the left flank of the Russian troops that had broken through and stopped their advance to the west. Although the Germans did not have enough forces to achieve a decisive success, they nevertheless managed to eliminate the mortal danger of a deep breakthrough of Russian formations and their entry into the operational space. By transferring part of the forces to the west, the Germans were able to detain the enemy approximately on the Fastov-Radomyshl-Korosten line. For this failure, the Russians tried to respond with a new offensive on the front of the 8th Army and Army Group A. In the course of heavy fighting, which dragged on until December 1943, they managed to achieve some local successes here: to seize a bridgehead in the Kherson region and capture Chigirin and Cherkassy. But the Germans still retained the integrity of their front. The serious danger that threatened the front in October-November had passed. However, despite this seemingly satisfactory development of events, the German troops, despite everything that was done to increase their combat effectiveness, became even weaker. The fact that in the course of its counteroffensive the 4th Panzer Army, despite the skillful leadership of the command, favorable conditions and selfless actions of the troops, failed to build on the initial tactical success and achieve victory on an operational scale, should have been a new alarm signal for the Germans. . The superior forces of the Russians, operating as part of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Ukrainian Fronts, threatened to break through the thin fabric of the German defense in any place they desired with a new blow.

Battles for the Dnieper in autumn 1943

The troops of Army Group Center, meanwhile, made a systematic withdrawal and also took up new defenses. The front line now ran along the Sozh and Pronya rivers and, continuing further north east of Orsha and Vitebsk, connected in the area east of Nevel with the front line of Army Group North. But the troops of the army group could not get at least a small respite on this new frontier. The large forces of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Belorussian Fronts operating here made frequent attacks on the German troops, trying to outflank them, in the sector of the 2nd Army and break through the weak front of the army group. However, the German troops, with the support of the small, but extremely operational aviation units of Colonel-General von Greim, successfully overcame numerous and sometimes very dangerous positions.

The situation that developed on the right flank of the 2nd Army, where the defeats suffered by the Army Group South, made itself felt especially strongly, took on the most critical character. Becoming more and more open, this flank forced the army command to allocate part of the forces to cover it. The Russians took advantage of the difficult situation in which the army found itself and went on the offensive in the direction of Gomel. In stubborn battles, the Germans at first managed to hold their positions and prevent the enemy from breaking through their front. However, in early November, when the front of the neighboring 4th Panzer Army (Army Group South) was broken through and the Russians began to advance in the direction of Korosten, the situation deteriorated significantly. Now the enemy launched an offensive also against the completely uncovered junction of Army Groups "South" and "Center". After fierce fighting, the Russians broke through the front of the 2nd Army, which threw its last reserves into battle, and, turning then to the northwest, began to advance towards Rechitsa and Mozyr. As a result, the formations operating on its right flank south of the Pripyat River were cut off from the army, and a threat was created to the main communications of the Germans, the Minsk-Mozyr railway. Communication with the 4th Panzer Army, maintained for quite a long time only by moving units, was completely lost. The enemy went deep into the rear of the troops of the right flank of the 2nd Army in the Ovruch area. The small southern grouping, cut off from the main forces of the army, was under the threat of encirclement, which it managed to avoid only as a result of a quick breakthrough in the north-western direction. The breakthrough was carried out successfully, and the grouping again connected with the main forces of the army in the area southeast of Mozyr. But the gap that existed between Army Groups Center and South widened to more than 100 km. A serious threat arose to the troops defending on the eastward ledge of the front in the Gomel region. Despite this, Hitler rejected a proposal to withdraw these troops to new positions. As a result, the situation became even more aggravated. On November 17, Rechitsa was surrendered, and after that the Russians went to the Mozyr-Zhlobin railway and thereby cut the last communication linking the troops defending Gomel with the main German forces.

Now the Russians went on the offensive and, in the sector of the front north of Gomel, in the Propoisk region, in the course of heavy fighting, they broke through the German defenses to a considerable depth. The advance of the enemy was stopped approximately only at the Chausy-Bykhov line. German troops operating in the Gomel region were under the threat of encirclement. The resulting situation forced the German command at the very last moment to withdraw its troops from the ledge of the front they occupied. By mid-December, the troops took up new positions along the Dnieper, and their position was somewhat strengthened. The gap formed during the fighting between the main forces of the Army Group and the 2nd Army was liquidated as a result of the counteroffensive undertaken here. Thus, by the end of the year, the troops of the right wing of Army Group Center again occupied a more or less strong position, and only the gap that existed at the junction of Army Groups Center and South in the area south of Mozyr was still not closed. From the beginning of winter, the Pripyat swamps became relatively passable, at least it was now possible to conduct military operations here, and this forced the Germans to allocate additional forces to cover the swamps.

In front of the central sector of the front of the army group, the Russians concentrated their main effort on the direction of Smolensk - Orsha - Minsk. Here they tried several times with large forces to launch an offensive with the aim of breaking through the front of the 4th Army on its right flank. Thanks to the exceptional stamina of the troops, the skillful actions of the commanders of units and formations, as well as the presence of a deeply echeloned and well-equipped defense here, the Germans managed to repulse all the attacks of the significantly superior enemy forces that they made until December 1943. The Russians suffered great damage here.

Less successful were the actions of the 3rd Panzer Army, which was defending on the right wing of the army group. In early October, the Russians broke through its front near Nevel in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe junction with the 16th Army (Army Group North). The inner flanks of both armies had to be turned back. It was not possible to close the ever-widening gap, and since Hitler this time again rejected the proposal to withdraw the troops located on the flanks of both armies and found themselves in danger of being captured, the danger was gradually created that the Russians would go behind the rear of the left wing of the 3rd Panzer Army from the north and northwest. Since both army groups did not have the strength to close the gap by counterattack, as Hitler repeatedly demanded, the pressure of the enemy against the open left flank of Army Group Center became more and more sensitive. Gradually, a great threat arose for the main communications of the 3rd Panzer Army, which passed through Polotsk. On December 13, the Russians launched a decisive offensive. They launched a series of attacks in converging directions from the east, north and northeast. The division, which was defending on the left flank of the army, was defeated; its remnants managed to break through the encirclement, but at the same time all the materiel was lost. The tank army was thrown back to Vitebsk, but here it managed to gain a foothold and hold a bridgehead on the right bank of the Western Dvina. All attacks of the enemy, who tried to break through the front of the army, were repulsed. The gap between Army Group Center and Army Group North, covered only by insignificant forces, continued to exist and posed a serious danger, since the Russians could use it to advance along the Western Dvina to the northwest in order to deeply envelop Army Group North ".

On the front of Army Group North, the Russians limited themselves to a slight increase in activity. However, this allowed them to pin down the significant forces of the army group, which, because of this, was unable to find the means to eliminate the crisis near Nevel, which also posed a serious danger to it.

The results of hostilities in 1943

1943 brought Germany equally disappointing results both in the Mediterranean and in the East. The last attempt by the Germans to seize once again the initiative in the East into their own hands failed amazingly quickly in the Kursk region. In subsequent offensive operations in the summer and autumn, the Russian army demonstrated its high fighting qualities and showed that it had not only significant manpower reserves, but also excellent military equipment. The active actions of the Russians were the cause of numerous crises, the catastrophic consequences of which the Germans managed to avoid only thanks to the tactical superiority they retained and the exceptional dedication of the German soldiers. However, there could be no doubt - and this has to be constantly emphasized - that serious signs of fatigue began to appear in the German troops, who had experienced tremendous strain for a number of years. As a result of huge losses in the officers, non-commissioned officers and specialists who made up the backbone of the German troops, their stamina became less and less strong, in connection with which the German command met with great anxiety each new enemy offensive.

The German High Command could stabilize the situation in the East only if the Germans were able to decisively eliminate the first attempt by the Western Allies to launch an invasion of the continent, definitely expected next year.

The Tehran Conference clearly showed that the Western Powers were completely unaware of the danger that could arise for the entire international situation after the defeat of Germany. They firmly adhered to the course of defeating Germany, and therefore, at that time, the Germans could not find any way out of the situation with the help of political means, even if Hitler had decided to take this step.

Thus, the task of the German Eastern Army remained the same - to weaken the forces of the Russians and to hold the lines located as far as possible to the east of the borders of Germany and the most important sources of raw materials that were still in the hands of the Germans. Unfortunately, as experience showed, it was difficult to hope that the political and military leadership would be able to convince Hitler of the need to find for this task a method of conducting combat operations that would best suit the forces and means of the Eastern Army.

The offensive of Russian troops in the winter of 1943-1944 on the southern sector of the front and their exit to the Carpathians

By the end of the autumn battles of 1943, German troops in the southern sector of the front occupied a weak defense, covered only in some areas by natural obstacles, in which there were many dangerous ledges and dents. Hitler, for reasons that have been repeatedly pointed out, all the time refused to level the front line and withdraw the troops back to more advantageous lines. The troops of the right wing of Army Groups "A" and "South" were still behind the Dnieper, holding a large bridgehead to the east of Nikopol, covering the manganese mines. Further, the front line went west through Krivoy Rog and again went to the Dnieper, covering a large Russian bridgehead at Cherkasy. Then the front again turned to the northwest, forming a large arc, passed east of Brusilov and Radomyshl and ended east of Korosten. Here, between Army Group South and Army Group Center, whose right flank was in the Mozyr area, there was a wide gap. The dividing line between Army Group A (6th Army and 1st Tank Army) and Army Group South (8th Army and 4th Tank Army) ran from Kirovograd to the west.

Thus, the southern sector of the front, with its salient in the Nikopol region and with the excessively extended defense zones of its formations, gave the enemy many opportunities for conducting offensive operations here. Of course, Hitler understood this too. But for some reason that was becoming more and more incomprehensible, he constantly overestimated his own strength and underestimated the strength of the enemy. This was probably due to political and economic considerations.

During the winter, troops of the 1st Russian Ukrainian Front inflicted a series of powerful blows on the southern sector of the German front. So, on Christmas Day 1943, they went on the offensive in the area west of Kyiv in the sector of the 4th Panzer Army. They managed to break through a gap in the German defenses in the Radomyshl area, quickly expand it and make a deep breakthrough. The Germans were forced to leave Brusilov, Korostyshev and Radomyshl. On January 1, 1944, the Russians approached Zhitomir. The resistance of the 4th Panzer Army was broken, and the Russian troops, expanding the breakthrough to the south and north, rushed in an unstoppable stream in a westerly direction. A few days later, having put forward large forces to cover their left flank, they reached the old Polish-Soviet border and crossed it. By mid-January, the enemy, almost without meeting any resistance, reached the line of Sarny - Shepetovka - Berdichev - Pogrebishchensky.

Due to the fact that the advancing Russian troops and their communications turned out to be excessively stretched, in early February the Germans managed, by taking a number of emergency measures to strengthen their defenses, to stop the enemy, who was striking in a westerly direction, at the turn east of Dubna, Lutsk and Kovel. However, the enemy troops, advancing on the left flank of the strike force, turned to the south-west and tried to encircle the 8th Army with a strike on Uman. The German reserves managed to stop the advance of these troops and, as a result of a skillfully executed counterattack, threw them back to the Zhashkov-Pogrebishchensky line.

The next blow the enemy brought down directly on the 8th army. Despite the fact that as a result of the defeat of the 4th Panzer Army, a serious threat was created to the left flank of the 8th Army, to cover which almost all of its reserves were thrown, Hitler continued to keep the army on the Dnieper, wanting to maintain contact with the army group advanced far to the east. "BUT". Even the strikes of the 2nd and 3rd Ukrainian fronts, which were carried out with the aim of probing the German front in January 1944 and which led to the loss by the Germans of Krivoy Rog on the right and Bila Tserkva on the left flanks, clearly showing the intentions of the Russians, did not force the Germans to accept the self-evident decision to withdraw the 8th Army. The reason that the only correct conclusion was not drawn from this situation should, obviously, be sought in the fact that the withdrawal of the 8th Army would inevitably entail the retreat of the entire Army Group "A" and the surrender to the enemy of the important areas of Krivoy Rog and Nikopol.

But since no such decision was made, the 8th Army was doomed to defeat. On January 28, the advanced units of the Russian troops, advancing from the north and southeast, united in the rear of the 8th Army in the Zvenigorodka region and surrounded its two corps. Having gathered into a fist all the tank units of the 8th Army and the 1st Tank Army, the Germans in early February made an attempt to free their encircled troops, which were initially supplied by air. The attempt failed. The advancing troops did not have enough strength to break through to the encircled corps. Despite this, both corps launched an excellently prepared offensive with the aim of breaking through to the southwest, while achieving significant success on the night of February 16-17. But the corps failed to fully connect with the tank formations advancing towards them. Only a few days later, about 30 thousand people, having lost almost all heavy weapons and equipment, left the encirclement, uniting with the main forces of the German troops. The disastrous method of operational leadership used by Hitler and expressed in the words "hold on at all costs" became his constant principle, which he very rarely changed, and even then only under the influence of his closest military assistants. This principle led the Germans to new heavy losses, which, with the right actions of the command, could have been avoided.

The Russians delivered their third blow on the front of the 1st Panzer and 6th armies. Their presence on the Krivoy Rog-Kherson arc, where they defended the iron and manganese mines, now, after the defeat of Army Group South, was completely meaningless from an operational point of view, but Hitler continued to keep them there. The superior forces of the Russian 3rd Ukrainian Front launched an offensive against the positions of the 1st Tank and 6th Armies from the north and south. Part of the German troops was trapped in the Nikopol area. Only at the very last moment did they manage to withdraw with heavy losses across the Ingulets River. On February 22, the Russians captured Krivoy Rog.

Exit of Russian troops to the Carpathians

The southern sector of the front still had a ledge on its right flank, which went far into the enemy's disposition. The front line began in the Kherson region, passed along the Dnieper, continued further along the Ingulets River to the northeast and, turning then to the northwest, went to Shepetovka, thus forming a large arc. To the north of Shepetovka, the solid front ended, and before the Pripyat swamps, the troops were located only in separate strongholds, carrying out security service at the turn east of Brody, Dubna, Lutsk and Kovel. At the first glance at the map, it becomes clear to anyone, not even a military specialist, that such a disposition of troops was fraught with great danger for the entire southern sector of the front. After all, the remnants of Army Group A, as if on purpose, were located in such a way that they could easily be bypassed from the north and surrounded. Only by the brutal pressure that Hitler exerted at that time on his military commanders, who directed military operations in the East, can one explain the fact that, in spite of all counterproposals and objections, and proceeding only from considerations of political and economic order, he was able to carry out his decision in life, leaving the troops of the southern sector of the front, in fact, to the mercy of fate. The Russians, of course, could not miss the opportunity so kindly provided to them to close the trap.

In early March, the 1st Ukrainian Front, now commanded by Marshal Zhukov, went on the offensive again. In the course of short battles, his troops broke through the weak defenses of the 4th Panzer Army and turned their main forces to the south in order to completely close the trap by means of a deep enveloping blow from the north. Despite the fact that in the area east of Ternopil, the Germans made an attempt to quickly gather their tank units into a fist and stop the offensive of the Russian troops with a counterattack, the latter, like an avalanche, moved uncontrollably south. Soon the railway line Ternopol - Proskurov was cut, the most important communication that provided the Germans with communication with Army Group A.

Meanwhile, on March 6, the troops of the 2nd Ukrainian Front under the command of Marshal Konev also went on the offensive. They quickly broke through the front of the significantly weakened 8th Army, but were briefly stopped in the Gaisin area by a counterattack by one German tank group, which fought with exceptional dedication and stubbornness. By March 10, the Russians reached Uman. Without stopping, they continued to advance to the southwest and on March 13 they reached the Southern Bug in the Gaivoron region on a wide front, capturing small bridgeheads on the unprotected right bank of the river. The German troops, still defending in the Vinnitsa area, in the gap between the advancing troops of the 1st and 2nd Ukrainian fronts, were under the threat of encirclement from the adjacent wings of both fronts and were forced to quickly withdraw in a southwestern direction.

Both Russian strike groups, interacting with each other, continued their offensive to the southwest in order to encircle the troops of Army Group A, which were still far to the east. On March 20, the advanced units of the Russians reached the Dniester and crossed it in the area of ​​Soroka and Mogilev-Podolsky, thereby depriving the Germans of the opportunity to gain a foothold on this new, advantageous line for them.

The German command, with all the forces at its disposal, sought to prevent the rupture that threatened to materialize between Army Group South and Army Group A and to stop the Russian offensive, which even spatially approached its climax.

The 8th Army was reinforced and received an order, clinging to all lines convenient for defense, to counteract the Russian offensive. The headquarters of the 1st Panzer Army received the task of stopping the Russian offensive in the area south of Proskurov and Ternopol, which was developing in a southerly direction towards the Carpathians, using the forces of formations reassigned to it. But these measures were taken by the Germans too late and therefore only partially led to the desired results.

On March 21, the 1st Ukrainian Front, whose troops achieved the greatest operational successes, again went on the offensive from the Ternopil-Proskurov line. After heavy fighting, the Russians knocked down the barriers created with great difficulty by the 4th Panzer Army and threw them back in a general direction to the west. Encountering weak resistance here from the troops of the 1st Panzer Army, which, after reforming, were pulled up to the front, the Russians bypassed them north of the Dniester in the area of ​​​​Kamianets-Podolsky and Skala-Podolskaya and surrounded them with part of the forces, sending the main forces further through Kolomyia and Chernivtsi to the spurs Carpathians. The 1st Panzer Army, which was in the "cauldron" and somehow supplied by air, stubbornly resisted. In early April, she managed, interacting with units trying to free her from the west, to break through in the direction of Stanislav.

Interestingly, since the time of Stalingrad, "boilers" have already ceased to seem so terrible to the Germans. The German soldier and the German command realized that even surrounded, almost unsupplied troops have a lot of opportunities to avoid destruction or surrender. But this discovery did not at all remove the blame from the German High Command, which, by its directives, again and again put its troops in a position from which they could be freed only at the cost of unjustified and at the same time completely irreparable human and material losses.

The 8th Army was also able to delay the advance of superior enemy forces only for a very short time. Striking with large forces between Soroca and Rybnitsa across the Dniester, the Russians advanced southwest in the direction of Iasi and south between the Prut and Dniester and along both banks of the Dniester.

Following the capture of Krivoy Rog at the end of February, the troops of the 3rd Ukrainian Front continued their offensive against Army Group A. Delivering the main blow to her left wing, the Russians tried to bypass the army group and press it to the Black Sea. As a result of the offensive of the concentrated Russian forces between the rivers Ingul and Ingulets, the 1st Panzer Army, even before the dissolution of its headquarters, fell into a very difficult situation. However, despite the fact that during the pursuit the Russians went through the Kinburn Peninsula to the rear of the German troops, the German command still managed to timely withdraw to the west through the Southern Bug both the right wing of the 1st Panzer Army and the entire 6th Army operating to the south, in the region of Kherson and Nikolaev. Meanwhile, the troops of the left wing of the 1st Panzer Army were still far advanced to the northwest in the area between Novoukrainka and Novoarkhangelsk. Here the enemy has not yet attacked. When the Russians, bypassing them from the west, crossed the Southern Bug and approached the Dniester, the Germans had to quickly withdraw these forces through the crossings near Voznesensk and Pervomaisk, which were still in their hands, and include them in the new front created beyond Tiligul.

At the end of March, the 6th Army, together with units of the former 1st Tank Army now subordinate to it, occupied a new defense behind Tiligul. In the Ananiev area, it joined up with the 8th Army, whose front was turned to the north and, crossing the Odessa-Lvov railway, reached the city of Iasi. Defending in the direction of the main Russian attack, the 8th Army tried to stop the enemy offensive, which had begun to gradually weaken. From the area west of Yass to the Carpathians, Romanian units operated, commanded by the headquarters of the 4th Romanian army. On the northeastern spurs of the Carpathians, the Hungarian troops defended themselves.

Completely unacceptable from a military point of view, Hitler's leadership of the fighting on the southern sector of the Eastern Front led the Germans to huge and unnecessary losses. It caused sharp disagreements between the Supreme High Command and the commanders of the troops operating there, Field Marshals von Manstein and von Kleist. Hitler unjustly blamed these eminent military leaders for all the failures that had taken place and replaced the first with Colonel-General Model, and the second with Colonel-General Schörner, hoping that the latter would more vigorously implement his decisions.

Army groups were again renamed. Army Group South became Army Group Northern Ukraine and Army Group A became Southern Ukraine. They were given the task of finally stopping the offensive of the Russian troops at the turn: the mouth of the Dniester, the area east of Chisinau, north of Yass, the eastern spurs of the Carpathians, Kolomyia, the area west of Ternopil, Brody, Kovel. In pursuance of this directive, the southern wing of the German troops was withdrawn beyond the Dniester, and on April 9, Odessa was evacuated. In the northern part of the Carpathians, the Germans managed to push back the advanced Russian units to Kolomya, which advanced to the Yablunytsky Pass, but the Germans failed to release the Ternopil garrison, which had been surrounded for several months. On April 25, after fierce resistance from the units that were part of the garrison and fought to the last drop of blood, the enemy stormed the city.

Fight for Crimea

Let us now turn to what was happening at that time on the Crimean peninsula. The main forces of the German troops were already several hundred kilometers from it, and meanwhile the troops remaining there continued to chain significant Russian forces to themselves. The supply and evacuation of these troops could only be carried out by sea.

Even at a time when German troops could be withdrawn from the Crimea through the Isthmus of Perekop, a proposal was made to Hitler for the planned evacuation of the Crimea. But Hitler decided to defend the peninsula. The reasons that prompted him to do so remain unclear to this day. The peninsula, the narrow approaches to which could be easily blocked, was not a base from which, on occasion, it would be possible to strike against the open left flank of the Russian troops advancing to the west, and the forces of the 17th Army left on the peninsula were insufficient and unsuitable for conducting such offensive actions. In addition, while holding the Crimea, the Germans could not, of course, tie down such a large number of Russian troops that this would to some extent justify the forces and means spent on the defense of the peninsula. Obviously, the decisive factors in Hitler's decision were considerations related to the need to ensure the operation of the Romanian oil fields, since with the fall of the Crimea the threat of air attack on these areas increased significantly, as well as considerations related to the possibility of continuing to put pressure on Turkey, which supplied Germany with extremely the raw material she needs is chromium. With the entry of the Russians to the Carpathians, these considerations, of course, completely lost their significance, but it was not possible to convince Hitler of making a timely decision to evacuate the Crimea, until in early April the troops of the 4th Ukrainian Front went on the offensive and with a swift blow threw off peninsula, the forces stationed there (4 German and 6 Romanian divisions).

On April 8, the Russians launched an offensive against the positions of the 17th Army simultaneously on the Kerch Peninsula, on the Perekop Isthmus and across the Sivash. In the Kerch region, during many days of fighting, the Russians somewhat pressed the German troops defending the isthmus. But since the Russians, meanwhile, managed to break through from the north and put all the troops in the eastern part of the peninsula at risk of encirclement, the troops defending the Kerch Peninsula had to retreat. In the north, the enemy, having pinned down the troops operating on the Perekop Isthmus, suddenly crossed the Sivash - a shallow bay of the Sea of ​​\u200b\u200bAzov, replete with islands, along which the Melitopol-Dzhankoy railway was also laid. Thus, bypassing the Perekop group of Germans from the flank, the Russians deprived the defense system of the peninsula of its strength. Due to the fact that it was impossible to create defenses on the islands with the insignificant forces available, the army command, not being able to contain the strongest onslaught of the enemy, was forced to decide on the immediate withdrawal of all units to the well-defended fortress of Sevastopol. Under the strong influence of enemy aircraft, in the conditions of superiority of the enemy in the Naval Forces, the evacuation of the peninsula was begun. It was carried out with the help of a very small number of available marine vehicles. First of all, the rear services and units of the Germans, as well as the Romanian units, were evacuated. German divisions held the city and its environs, providing loading.

In the course of heavy fighting, which lasted about three weeks, the Russians pushed back the stubbornly resisting German divisions to the line of the old forts of the fortress. On May 7, having launched a night attack, the Russians captured this line. After fierce battles for the city, port and separate defensive structures of the fortress, the remnants of the German troops were thrown back to the Cape of Chersonesus. Here, repulsing the attacks of superior enemy forces and hoping for an early evacuation, they held out for another day, but the ships promised to them for evacuation were not sent. All hopes of rescuing these forces squeezed into a tiny space collapsed, and continuous Russian attacks from land and air strikes, together with devastating artillery fire, forced them to capitulate. The main forces of the 17th Army, as well as the remnants of the Romanian units and all military equipment, were lost.

The loss of the Crimea by the Germans, the advance of Russian troops in Romania and the threat of an invasion of Hungary - all this, of course, could not but affect Germany's allies. The unrest caused by the development of events in Romania and Hungary led to a further reduction in the already very insignificant contribution of the allies to the common cause. Hitler failed to achieve a serious increase in their ability to fight through political influence on these countries. The Romanians, having taken a number of measures to defend their territory from the Russians, apparently as a distraction, at the same time tried to establish contact with Soviet Russia and the Western powers behind the back of the dictator Antonescu.

In order to prevent the withdrawal of Hungary, whose troops were always unreliable, and which was now more busy arguing with Rumania over the remaining unresolved border issues than fighting against Russia, German troops suddenly occupied it, occupying the most important points of the country. The Hungarian regent Horthy was forced to form a new government. But the new government failed to achieve a serious intensification of the struggle against the Bolsheviks, who were already standing at the borders of Hungary.

From the book History of Russia from Rurik to Putin. People. Developments. Dates author Anisimov Evgeny Viktorovich

Military operations in the second half of 1943 - spring 1945 After the turning point of the Battle of Kursk, the war moved back - to the west. The Soviet command, taking advantage of its growing superiority in technology and manpower, using the precious experience of previous years of the war, kept

author Westphal Siegfried

Military operations in the summer of 1943 Operation "Citadel" The views of individual representatives of the German command regarding the most expedient method of conducting combat operations in the East in the summer of 1943 diverged sharply. However, it was clear to everyone that to lead a major

From the book Protracted Blitzkrieg. Why Germany lost the war author Westphal Siegfried

Military operations on the front of the Army Group North in the winter of 1943-1944 On the front of the Army Group North, there have so far been far fewer crises than on the rest of the Eastern Front. With the exception of the remaining very unstable position on the right wing and in

From the book Neither Fear nor Hope. Chronicle of the Second World War through the eyes of a German general. 1940-1945 author Zenger Frido background

BATTLE ACTIONS BETWEEN JULY 12 AND 17, 1943 On July 12, the commander of the 6th Italian Army gave the following order to the 16th Italian Army Corps: “In view of the situation created as a result of the known actions of the enemy, at the moment I consider it inappropriate

From the book Big landing. Kerch-Eltigen operation author Kuznetsov Andrey Yaroslavovich

2. Crimea in the plans of the parties in the fall of 1943 By September 1943, in the very south of the Soviet-German front, the enemy continued to hold the Kuban bridgehead. Hitler hoped to use it for a new invasion of the Caucasus. But after the defeat at Kursk, it became clear that these

From the book German-Italian military operations. 1941–1943 author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Battle of Tunisia Fighting in North Africa (November 8, 1942 - May 12, 1943) After the defeat of the French Republic in July 1940, control over the North African colonies of this country, including Tunisia, was carried out by the collaborationist government

From the book Trial by Fire author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Actions of the Black Sea Group (January 11 - February 4, 1943) The offensive operation in the Krasnodar-Tikhoretsk direction was the first offensive operation of the troops of the Black Sea Group of the Transcaucasian Front, which went on the offensive after a long period

From the book Trial by Fire author Moshchansky Ilya Borisovich

Actions of the Northern Group (January 1 - February 4, 1943) On December 25, 1942, preparing for the transition to a general offensive, the commander of the Northern Group of Forces decided to create a strike force on the right wing of the group in the 44th Army zone, consisting of two rifle corps (10- th

author Goncharov Vladislav Lvovich

ACTIONS OF THE 2ND UKRAINIAN FRONT IN SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 1943

From the book Battle for the Dnieper. 1943 author Goncharov Vladislav Lvovich

Actions of the 37th Army on the foothold south of Kremenchug in September-October 1943 NGSH comrade. ANTONOV 24.9.43, 16:15. I ORDER: 1. By 24:00 25.9.43 take combat area 69

From the book Battle for the Dnieper. 1943 author Goncharov Vladislav Lvovich

Actions of the 52nd Army in the Cherkassy region in November 1943 , mp "Germany", TD SS "Viking", 72 pd, 331 pp 167 pd and 585 pp 320 pd with support up to 5

From the book Battle for the Dnieper. 1943 author Goncharov Vladislav Lvovich

II. Actions of the 2nd Ukrainian Front in September-December 1943 Operations of the 37th Army 1. The situation in the Steppe Front by September 20, 1943 and the decision of the front commander to force the Dnieper. (2 lanes)2. The operational situation of the troops of the Steppe Front on September 24, 1943

From the book Baltic divisions of Stalin author Petrenko Andrey Ivanovich

4. The actions of the Latvian division during the operation against the Nazi bridgehead Demyansk. Transformation of the division into a guards division (July 1942 - January 1943) The command of the division and the leadership of the republic made significant efforts to preserve people, ensure

From the book Tenth IAS Flotilla author Borghese Valerio

FRONT Narrows, 10th Flotilla ACTIVATES ITS ACTION MAY - SEPTEMBER 1943 On May 1, 1943, Captain 2nd Rank Forza left command of the 10th Flotilla MAC in connection with his assignment to one of the ships; I was appointed instead of him. Our flotilla turned into a large

From the book Solovetsky Monastery and the defense of the White Sea in the XVI-XIX centuries author Frumenkov Georgy Georgievich

§ 4. Military operations in the White Sea and near the Solovetsk Islands in the summer of 1855 At the end of October 1854, the Solovetsky rector, on a call from the synod, went to the capital to personally explain the needs of the monastery "for its future security." Petersburg, he was received by Nicholas I, passed

From the book Anatoliy_Petrovich_Gritskevich_Borba_za_Ukrainu_1917-1921 by the author

MILITARY ACTIONS IN UKRAINE IN THE SUMMER - AUTUMN OF 1919 THE INVASION OF THE VOLUNTEER ARMY The first attempts at an organized offensive by the White Guards into Ukraine date back to January 1919, when the Austro-German troops left the country. The departure of these troops from Donetsk

April 2, 1943. 650th day of the war

April 3, 1943. 651st day of the war

April 4, 1943. 652nd day of the war

North Caucasian Front. (see North Caucasian offensive operation (January 1 - February 4, 1943) 1.29 MB) On April 4, the troops of the North Caucasian Front (I. I. Maslennikov) launched an offensive against the German 17th Army, which had entrenched itself on the Taman Peninsula. At 9 o'clock in the morning, the 56th Army launched an offensive against the village of Krymskaya, the main stronghold of the enemy's entire defense. Defending on a heavily fortified line, the enemy put up stubborn resistance. It was especially difficult for the troops of the 56th Army to advance. In the zone of their actions, the enemy had a large number of machine guns that were not suppressed during artillery preparation. By the end of the day, the formations of the army moved forward and reached the railway east of the Crimean. The Nazis fiercely resisted, often turning into counterattacks. By the end of the day, the weather deteriorated sharply. The artillery could no longer support the infantry advance with its fire, as visibility was reduced to 500 m due to heavy rain. When units of the 383rd Infantry Division, now commanded by Colonel E. N. Skorodumov, moved forward, the enemy met them with strong fire. And then the enemy threw more than an infantry regiment and 20 tanks onto this wedge that had advanced forward. Counterattacked from the flanks, parts of the division after fierce battles were forced to retreat to their original position. />(p. 321)

April 5, 1943. 653rd day of the war

North Caucasian Front. On April 5 the weather was still bad. Continuous heavy rains greatly hampered the actions of the troops. The rivers Adagum, Vtoraya, Abin burst their banks and flooded the area where the 2nd Guards Rifle and 83rd Mountain Rifle Divisions were operating. All roads were washed out and flooded with water. Ammunition and food were delivered to the troops with great difficulty, manually. Soviet soldiers often had to wade through wetlands. Despite this, the front commander I. I. Maslennikov decided to continue the offensive.

April 6, 1943. 654th day of the war

April 7, 1943. 655th day of the war

April 8, 1943. 656th day of the war

April 9, 1943. 657th day of the war

April 10, 1943. 658th day of the war

April 11, 1943. 659th day of the war

April 12, 1943. 660th day of the war

On the evening of April 12, at a meeting at Headquarters, as a result of a thorough analysis of the situation, everyone agreed that the most likely goal of the summer offensive of the Nazi troops would be to encircle and destroy the main forces of the Central and Voronezh fronts on the Kursk salient. Subsequently, the development of success in the eastern and southeastern directions, including Moscow, was not ruled out. On this occasion, I.V. Stalin showed particular concern. As a result, it was decided to concentrate our main efforts in the Kursk region, bleed the enemy here in a defensive operation, and then go on the counteroffensive and finally complete his defeat. In order to avoid surprises, it was recognized as necessary to create a deep and strong defense on the entire strategic front, but a particularly powerful one in the Kursk direction. In the event that the Nazi command did not launch an offensive in the near future, but delayed it for a long time, another option was envisaged - the transition of the Soviet troops to active operations, without waiting for enemy strikes. (p.123)

April 13, 1943. 661st day of the war

April 14, 1943. 662nd day of the war

North Caucasian Front. On April 14, the troops of the North Caucasian Front again went over to the offensive. All day, formations of the 58th, 9th and 37th armies made repeated attacks, but they could not break through the enemy's defenses. The situation was more successful in the zone of operations of the 56th Army. At the turn of the river The second troops of the army broke the resistance of the enemy and went to the railway southeast of the bridge across the river. Adagum, the state farm "Pyatiletka" (5 km south of Krasnoe), the Taranova beam, and on the site of the dairy farm, they almost came close to the village of Krymskaya. The enemy put up fierce resistance, turning into continuous counterattacks. Particularly strong fighting flared up south of Krymskaya, where the 383rd division and the 61st rifle division of Major General S. N. Kuznetsov were advancing. On April 14, in the afternoon, the enemy threw more than two infantry regiments and 60 tanks from the Pyatiletka state farm. As a result of a long and extremely tense battle, he managed to push our units, but he could not completely restore the position of his defense. The reasons for the failure of the offensive were that the reconnaissance of the front line of the enemy's defense was weak, as a result of which the enemy's firing points were not suppressed. The artillery offensive was poorly organized: there was no artillery observation in the combat formations of the infantry, there was no proper communication with the infantry, and the artillery did not receive requests in a timely manner. Regimental artillery and anti-tank guns lagged behind the infantry, poor visibility prevented firing. The requirements of the army commander to take the initial position before the attack no further than 200 m from the enemy were not met. Before the attack, the 10th Guards Rifle Corps was 600 meters from the front line of the enemy's defense. With the beginning of the attack, the infantry unfriendly went forward. The movement in the attack took place without application to the terrain, without self-entrenching at the necessary moments of the battle. The aviation did not fulfill its task of delivering a bomb attack on the enemy's defensive positions. (p. 322)

April 15, 1943. 663rd day of the war

North Caucasian Front. The command of the North Caucasian Front (I. I. Maslennikov) decided on April 15 from 7 a.m. to resume the offensive of the 56th Army, but at 6 a.m. 30 minutes the enemy himself launched a counterattack. The advance of the enemy was strongly supported by aviation. Enemy planes hovered continuously over our positions. On that day, 1560 enemy sorties were noted. Such a massive air strike pinned our troops to the ground, and the artillery was forced to cease fire. For three days the enemy continuously counterattacked our troops, trying at all costs to restore the situation in the Krymskaya area. (p. 322)

April 16, 1943. 664th day of the war

April 17, 1943. 665th day of the war

On April 17, 1943, intense air battles began in the Kuban. Using favorable opportunities, German aviation seized the initiative in the air on this sector of the front. The command of the North Caucasian Front is transferring the main forces of the 4th and 5th air armies to the Novorossiysk region to help the troops of the 18th army.

April 18, 1943. 666th day of the war

North Caucasian Front. On April 18, Deputy Supreme Commander-in-Chief Marshal of the Soviet Union G.K. Zhukov arrived at the front headquarters. After reviewing the situation, he ordered the front commander to postpone the start of the offensive of the 56th Army from April 20 to April 25. But this time was not enough. In the period from April 18 to April 29, at the direction of Marshal Zhukov, a number of very important measures were taken in the troops of the front to improve the operational management of units, their material and technical support. The formations were urgently staffed with fresh forces, and the governing bodies were strengthened. In the 9th and 37th armies, special detachments were created from volunteers to operate across the floodplains in order to capture bridgeheads on opposite banks of the Kurka and Kuban rivers. For these detachments, guides were selected from local residents. The sappers and troops were preparing crossing facilities. In addition to preparing the offensive of the 56th Army, measures were also taken to restore the defense of the troops on Myskhako, to ensure the stability of the defense and to establish an uninterrupted supply of everything they need. All these measures allowed the troops of the North Caucasian Front to prepare well for the offensive. (p. 330)

April 19, 1943. 667th day of the war

North Caucasian Front. From April 17 to April 19, air battles took place in the Myskhako area with varying success. Soviet pilots inflicted significant losses on enemy aircraft, reducing the effectiveness of its strikes, but they could not prevent these strikes with a still felt lack of forces.

April 20, 1943. 668th day of the war

North Caucasian Front. Pulling up reserves, the enemy prepared for a general attack in order to cut the bridgehead into two isolated parts, and then destroy a group of landing troops. On April 20, the enemy launched the most powerful offensive against the defenders of Malaya Zemlya. The combat operations of the aviation of both sides in the Myskhako region reached the highest tension. With their massive actions, Soviet aviation fettered the enemy's offensive, forced enemy aircraft to reduce their activity. On our side, for the first time, part of the forces of the arriving air corps of the RGK was put into battle for the first time, which made it possible during the day to deliver two massive strikes against the combat formations of the infantry and artillery of the enemy in front of the front of the landing group. After these blows, the enemy stopped their offensive. Having failed to eliminate our bridgehead on Myskhako, General Ruoff was forced to admit that “it is impossible to continue the offensive. He (Ruoff) would like to concentrate forces, since there is a danger that the expected Russian offensive in the sector of the 44th Army Corps cannot be repelled.

In order to force the enemy to withdraw part of his forces from the Myskhako sector, the commander of the North Caucasian Front decided to strike on April 20 with the troops of the 56th Army south of the Crimean in the direction of Nizhne-Grechesky, Gorno-Vesely and Moldavanskoye. For this purpose, a tank group was created in the direction of the main attack of the 56th Army. To build up forces, there was a second echelon consisting of a special rifle division of the NKVD, the 32nd Guards Rifle Division and a tank group (63rd and 151st tank brigades). Fire support for the army was carried out by up to 15 reinforcement artillery regiments, and the entire aviation of the front was supposed to support the offensive of the troops from the air.

In the second half of April, the Supreme High Command transferred three aviation corps from the Stavka reserve to the North Caucasian Front: a bomber (2 tank), mixed (2 tank), fighter (3 Iac) and one separate fighter aviation division (287 above). By April 20, 300 aircraft from these air formations arrived in the Kuban, the transfer of the remaining forces (up to 200 aircraft) and their sequential entry into battle took place in late April - early May. Thus, by April 20, the Air Force of the North Caucasian Front, together with the aviation group of the Air Force of the Black Sea Fleet, the long-range aviation group and the main forces of the RGK air corps that had arrived, had 900 combat aircraft, of which up to 800 in front-line aviation (fighters - 270, attack aircraft - 170 , daytime bombers - 165 and night bombers - 195). This made it possible to eliminate the balance of forces, which was unfavorable for our aviation, and a tense struggle for air supremacy in the Kuban unfolded, in essence, with an equal number of aircraft. (p. 328)

April 21, 1943. 669th day of the war

April 22, 1943. 670th day of the war

April 23, 1943. 671st day of the war

North Caucasian Front. Analyzing the reasons for his failure at Myskhanko, the commander of the German 17th Army, Colonel-General Ruoff, at a meeting on April 23, said: “The offensive was unraveled by the Russians primarily because, due to bad weather, the offensive had been postponed all the time since April 7. Therefore, the offensive ran into fully prepared resistance. In addition, both advancing divisions - 4 gs and 125 pd - were not strong enough ... The poorly prepared replenishment also made itself felt. There was no interaction between infantry, artillery and aviation. The enemy was on favorable ground. All this led to the fact that the offensive aimed at capturing the city of Myskhako on April 17 was not successful. The offensive of April 20, in which all available forces took part, suffered greatly from the fact that it was hampered by a Russian air attack, in which 100 aircraft took part. Thus, this offensive was suppressed "...

On April 21-23, the power of our aviation strikes against the enemy increased even more due to the continued increase in the forces of the three RGK air corps being put into operation. On April 23, about 300 aircraft from these corps participated in the hostilities, which made it possible to change the overall balance of forces in aviation in the Myskhako area in our favor. The most important task assigned to aviation, to prevent organized strikes by bombers against the combat formations of the landing troops, was completed. This was noted in its order by the Military Council of the North Caucasian Front: “Starting from April 20, for three days, continuous air battles took place over the area of ​​​​the landing group, as a result of which enemy aircraft, having suffered exceptionally heavy losses, were forced to leave the battlefield. Air supremacy has passed into our hands. This determined the further ground situation. (p. 323) April 27, 1943. 675th day of the war

April 28, 1943. 676th day of the war

North Caucasian Front. Enemy aviation activity in the area of ​​the village of Krymskaya increased sharply on the eve of the transition of the 56th Army to the offensive. On the morning of April 28, German bombers in groups of 10-15 aircraft tried to drop bombs on the battle formations of our troops. During the day, the enemy made 850 air raids. Soviet fighters to repel an air enemy made 310 sorties and shot down 25 enemy aircraft in air battles, losing 18 of their own. From that day on, an air battle began over the village of Krymskaya, which, with short breaks, continued for many days. (p. 332)

April 29, 1943. 677th day of the war

North Caucasian Front. The offensive of the troops of the 56th Army on April 29 was preceded by a 40-minute air preparation, which then developed into air support. For three hours, 144 bombers, 82 attack aircraft and 265 fighters operated over the battlefield. During the day, our pilots made 1268 sorties, 379 of them at night. In air battles, they destroyed 74 enemy aircraft. In the combat report of the headquarters of the North Caucasian Front to the General Staff, the results of aviation actions for April 29 were assessed as follows: “The air forces of the front, having achieved air superiority, destroyed the enemy’s manpower and artillery by night and day, covered our units in the band of the 56th Army. During the day, fierce continuous air battles were waged "...

On April 29, at 07:40, after artillery preparation, which lasted 1 hour and 40 minutes, the main forces of the northern and southern strike groups of the 56th Army went on the offensive. The enemy unleashed massive air strikes on the advancing troops. The attacking Soviet soldiers were met with strong artillery and machine-gun fire. During the first day of the offensive, the army troops failed to break through the enemy defenses, and only by the end of the day the northern strike group wedged into enemy positions for 2 km. The reasons for the unsuccessful offensive were insufficiently clear planning of the artillery offensive. Despite a lengthy artillery preparation, the enemy's firepower was not suppressed. Moreover, when the infantry went on the attack, the artillery fire began to noticeably weaken, and in some areas the infantry was left without fire support at all. (p. 330)

April 30, 1943. 678th day of the war

North Caucasian Front. Over the next two days, the fighting became even more fierce. The advance of the troops of the 56th Army was hampered by numerous minefields and the fire of enemy strongholds located in the depths of his defenses. At the same time, enemy aircraft inflicted strong blows on the combat formations of our artillery, depriving it of the ability to conduct effective fire. In an effort to hold on to their defenses, the enemy often went over to violent counterattacks. He made especially strong counterattacks against units of the 11th Guards Rifle Corps. For two days, the guardsmen courageously fought off 6-8 counterattacks a day.

Wikipedia

Chronicle of the Great Patriotic War 1941: June July August September October November December 1942: January February March ... Wikipedia

The Soviet Armed Forces, having firmly mastered the initiative in conducting military operations, won the grandiose battles on the Kursk Bulge and for the Dnieper, entered the territory of Belarus and the Right-Bank Ukraine, and significantly approached the western borders of the USSR. The front line with a total length of 4400 km now ran (map 2) from the Rybachy Peninsula to the area west of Murmansk and Belomorsk, along the coast of Lake Onega, the Svir River, through Lake Ladoga and the Karelian Isthmus to the Gulf of Finland. Further, skirting Leningrad from the west, south and southeast, it went south east of Novgorod to Nevel, east of Vitebsk, Mogilev, Mozyr, Korosten, west of Cherkasy, east of Kirovograd and Nikopol, along the lower reaches of the Dnieper to Kherson, through the Perekop isthmus and eastern part of the Kerch Peninsula.

Soviet troops occupied an advantageous operational-strategic position, which made it possible to strike at the flanks of large enemy groupings. In the northwest, they covered the enemy grouping in the area of ​​Pushkin, Tosno. Chudovo, and in the west - in the eastern part of Belarus. In the southwestern direction, Soviet troops had two large strategic bridgeheads on the western bank of the Dnieper in the regions of Kyiv and Dnepropetrovsk. Owning the Kyiv bridgehead, they hung from the north over the entire grouping of Nazi troops in the Right-Bank Ukraine, creating a threat to its communications. The Dnepropetrovsk bridgehead made it possible to strike at the flank of the enemy, who was defending along the Dnieper near Kanev, and at the rear of his Krivoy Rog-Nikopol grouping. At the same time, the enemy, holding the Kanev ledge and bridgehead on the left bank of the Dnieper near Nikopol, threatened the flanks and rear of the Soviet troops operating south of Kyiv, in the Pyatikhatki area and on the Perekop isthmus.

In the north, from the Rybachy Peninsula to Lake Ladoga, the troops of the Karelian Front and the 7th Separate Army were opposed by the 20th German Mountain Army, the Maselskaya and Olonets operational groups of the Finnish troops, supported by formations of the 5th German air fleet and Finnish aviation . Here the parties occupied positional defense, limiting themselves to battles of local importance.

In the northwestern direction, from Lake Ladoga to Nevel, the German Army Group North and the Finnish Task Force Karelian Isthmus, supported by the 1st Air Fleet and Finnish aviation, defended against the troops of the Leningrad, Volkhov and 2nd Baltic fronts. On the Karelian Isthmus, as well as from the Gulf of Finland to the Hill, the parties occupied heavily fortified lines. The troops of the Leningrad and Volkhov fronts, after a long defense, were preparing for offensive operations. The enemy continued to improve defensive positions. The troops of the left wing of the 2nd Baltic Front were advancing northwest of Nevel and deeply engulfed the southern flank of Army Group North.

In the western strategic direction, from Nevel to the Pripyat River, the 1st Baltic, Western and Belorussian fronts operated. Their troops continued their offensive in the Vitebsk, Orsha, Mogilev, Bobruisk directions. The Nazi Army Group Center, supported by the 6th Air Fleet, defended itself against them on previously prepared lines. In December, the troops of the right wing of the 1st Baltic Front broke into the enemy defenses north of Vitebsk, engulfing the enemy grouping located in the city area from the north. In connection with the breakthrough of the troops of the 1st and 2nd Baltic Fronts at the junction of Army Groups "North" and "Center", a former Hitlerite General V. Erfurt wrote later, "an extremely difficult situation." The German command, “despite repeated attempts, failed to gather enough forces to simultaneously launch counterattacks from the north and south. Attacks made by insufficient forces were not successful, and the situation near Nevel turned into a source of constant danger ”(118) . The troops of the left wing of the Belorussian Front reached the approaches to Mozyr. As a result, the enemy's central and southern strategic groupings were separated by Polissya, which made interaction between them difficult.

The largest forces of the belligerents operated in the southwestern direction. Here, from the Pripyat River to the Kerch Peninsula, the troops of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Ukrainian Fronts and the Separate Primorsky Army were advancing. They included more than 42 percent of rifle divisions, 82 percent of tank and mechanized corps, and 45 percent of air divisions from all front-line formations. The main part of the reserves of the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command was also located here - the 47th and 69th combined arms, 2nd and 4th tank armies. The fascist German army groups "South" and "A", which were defending in this direction, included about half of all infantry and over 70 percent of tank and motorized divisions located on the Soviet-German front. They were supported by the strongest German 4th air fleet and Romanian aviation.

There were fierce battles between the Soviet and fascist troops. The battle for the Dnieper developed into a struggle for the Right-Bank Ukraine. The counter-offensive launched in November by Army Group South in the Zhytomyr region did not achieve its intended goals: it failed to push back Soviet troops from the western bank of the Dnieper and recapture Kyiv. The 1st Ukrainian Front, repelling enemy counterattacks on the Kiev bridgehead, was preparing for the offensive. The 2nd and 3rd Ukrainian fronts, completing the operations of the summer-autumn campaign, thwarted the enemy's attempts to liquidate the Dnepropetrovsk bridgehead and fought on the outskirts of Kirovograd and Krivoy Rog. The troops of the 4th Ukrainian Front in November reached the Dnieper in its lower reaches, broke into the Perekop Isthmus, locking the enemy in the Crimea, crossed the Sivash and captured the bridgehead on its southern bank. Due to the failure of the offensive in the Kiev-Zhytomyr direction, the Wehrmacht high command was forced to cancel the attack planned for mid-November from the Nikopol bridgehead in order to deblockade the Crimean group (119) . “In these heavy battles,” E. Manstein, commander of Army Group South, admitted, “an increasingly severe drop in the combat capability of our formations was inevitable. Infantry formations were constantly in battle. Tank formations, like a fire brigade, were thrown from one sector of the front to another ... OKH did not have the replenishment necessary for us in equipment and people to compensate for the losses ... "(120)

The Soviet Armed Forces also experienced great difficulties caused by a long offensive. The troops needed to be replenished with people, weapons, primarily tanks and means of transport. Communications stretched, and the rear lagged behind the troops. Due to the fact that the railways were badly destroyed by the retreating enemy, their restoration was extremely difficult, which further complicated the supply of troops, especially ammunition and fuel.

The situation in the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas was determined mainly by the course and results of military operations on land. The Northern, Baltic and Black Sea Fleets were moving from participation in defensive operations of ground forces in coastal areas to joint operations with them in offensive operations. The protection of their own sea lanes remained an important task for the fleets, while at the same time, the proportion of combat operations aimed at disrupting the enemy's sea lanes increased.

The air situation favored the Soviet Armed Forces. The aviation of the fronts, fleets, long-range and Air Defense Forces of the country firmly held strategic air supremacy.

The success of the Soviet Army and Navy was facilitated by the struggle of the patriots behind enemy lines, which reached its highest scope and activity since the beginning of the war. Partisans and underground fighters, disrupting the work of the enemy rear and command and control, undermined the combat capability of the enemy, diverted significant forces of his troops.

The active fronts and fleets of the Armed Forces of the USSR had, in general, a certain advantage in forces and means over the enemy.

Table 1. The balance of forces and means of the parties on the Soviet-German front by the beginning of 1944 (121)

Forces and means

Active fronts and fleets of the Armed Forces of the USSR (*1)

Armed forces of Nazi Germany and its allies

The balance of forces and means

Personnel (thousand people)

Tanks and self-propelled guns (assault guns)

Combat aircraft

By imposing cruel discipline, intensifying the intensity of indoctrination, multiplying repression against the discontented, the OKW continued to keep the army in obedience, forcing it to fight for interests alien to the German people. This army represented an even greater force.

From the above facts it is clear that on the whole the situation on the Soviet-German front was favorable for the Armed Forces of the USSR. The successful implementation of the summer-autumn offensive, which ended with the breaking of the enemy defenses on the Dnieper, the high morale of the Soviet troops, their quantitative and qualitative superiority over the enemy, strategic air supremacy, as well as the widespread partisan movement in the enemy rear created favorable conditions for conducting new offensive operations. with determined goals. The Soviet command, firmly in possession of the initiative in conducting military operations, had the opportunity to choose the forms and methods of armed struggle, the directions of the main attacks, and the place and time of operations.

Vostochny Val or the Panther-Wotan line is a defensive line of German troops, partially erected by the Wehrmacht in the fall of 1943 on the Eastern Front. The shaft passed along the line: the Narva River - Pskov - Vitebsk - Orsha - the Sozh River - the middle course of the Dnieper River (the basis of the Eastern Wall) - the Molochnaya River. The dual name was adopted to avoid confusion with the German border fortifications of 1939.

Map of the Eastern Front in July-December 1943. The Panther-Wotan line is indicated by a red zigzag.

The decision to build the Eastern Wall was made by order of Hitler on 08/11/1943. The shaft was divided into two frontiers - "Panther" (northern) and "Wotan" (southern). The defensive line of the German troops "Panther" was created in the zone of the Army Group "North" and the Army Group "Center". The Wotan line was built on the southern front in the zone of action of Army Group South and Army Group A.

In the north, the fortifications were erected approximately from Vitebsk and included two lines of defense: the 1st ran along the shores of Lake Pskov, the Velikaya, Pskova and Cherekha rivers, the 2nd ran along the western bank of the Velikaya River and the Narova River to the Baltic Sea near Narva. The Wotan line ran from the Sea of ​​Azov, along the right bank of the Molochnaya River to the Dnieper floodplains. From Smolensk to the Black Sea, the line ran for the most part along the right bank of the Dnieper or its large tributaries. The Wotan line, connecting with the Panther line, created a continuous defensive line from the Azov to the Baltic Sea.

The Panther line extended over 550 km from the Baltic Sea. Only in the sector of the army group "North" there were about 6 thousand fortifications, incl. 800 reinforced concrete. The rest of the fortifications were small log dugouts, although some of them had towers. In addition, 180 km of barbed wire barriers were installed, about 30 kilometers of anti-tank ditches were dug, and barriers were erected in tank-prone areas.

Construction work on the Panther line began in September 1943. The detachment of builders numbered 50 thousand people, despite the fact that, according to the calculations of engineers, at least 70 thousand workers were needed. According to some estimates, about 400 thousand people were required to carry out all the work on the Eastern Wall. However, according to experts, it is unlikely that the total number of workers available to all four army groups exceeded 200,000.

In the sector of Army Group Center in August 1943, key defensive points were created on sections of roads and railways that ran in the east-west direction. Defensive fortifications were also built on the lintel between the Dnieper and the Dvina. At the junction of the fronts of Army Group North and Army Group South, by November 1, 1943, the main points had anti-tank and anti-personnel defensive structures. These structures included barbed wire fences, trenches, anti-tank ditches, and other types of anti-tank fortifications.

According to the requirements of the Wehrmacht, the Panther line was to consist mainly of field positions with strongholds in the main deployment areas, which were to include separate concrete bunkers made of reinforced concrete. The priorities were distributed as follows:

1) anti-tank ditch and natural obstacles in the main direction of resistance;

2) winter shelters on the first line;

3) a continuous line of battle trenches;

4) anti-tank positions;

5) observation positions;

6) wire fences;

7) open firing points of heavy infantry weapons;

8) creation and clearing of the firing zone;

9) artillery positions;

10) communication trenches and communication passages.

The demolition of houses, the clearing of sectors of fire and the creation of a zone of devastation to a depth of 20 kilometers in front of the main direction of resistance were envisaged. The main line was also to be located 10 kilometers in front of the vital airfields of Gomel and Vitebsk. The work had to continue until the winter of 1943/44, since the positions had to be marked out before the snow fell. In addition, it was necessary to organize the quartering of troops.

It was also planned to build roads and bridges on the Panther line. The construction of the second line of defense, which ran along the Dnieper and was named the "Bear" line, was planned for August 1943. The line was to stretch along the Dnieper bank from the right flank of the army group to the Mogilev fortified area. In this area, the Dnieper is quite wide, and the high western bank of the river near Orsha rises above the eastern one.

Behind the "Panther" line, another defensive line was to be built under the name "Tiger" line - in the area of ​​the so-called earthen bridge and around Vitebsk. In August, the creation of a bridgehead in Bobruisk was planned, the importance of which increased even more in 1944, after most of the southern sections of the Panther line were lost in 1943.

However, the builders of the line had neither material nor human resources. And most importantly, they were catastrophically limited in time. In this regard, the southern part of the line was completed by no more than 30%. Since in the area of ​​the northern part of the line, active hostilities were not carried out by the Red Army at that time, the readiness of construction work reached 60%.

The line "Wotan" was much weaker fortified than the "Panther", especially in places where it departed from the Dnieper. The most powerful fortifications were in the area of ​​Zaporozhye and Melitopol. They consisted of anti-tank ditches, barbed wire in 4-6 rows, deep trenches and communication passages, dugouts, minefields, pillboxes and bunkers, reinforced concrete shelters and command posts. For every kilometer of defense, there were an average of 8 armored caps and 12 bunkers.

Despite the loud name, Vostochny Val was formidable only in German propaganda. In fact, all the structures belonged to the field fortification and were the second defensive line of the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front, after the Hagen line. It was not for nothing that the commander of Army Group North suppressed such propaganda in his troops, so as not to inspire false hope in them.

By the end of September, Manstein's Army Group "South" and Army Group "A", located to the south, were pushed back to the Eastern Wall. The 6th Army, which was driven out of the Wotan line and thrown back beyond the Dnieper, was included in Army Group A. The Eastern Wall caused disappointment among the German soldiers, since the Todt Organization completed only a small part of the planned work in the short time allotted to it. In addition, a large number of experienced OT workers who needed construction were sent to destroy buildings and material resources in areas subject to evacuation, since from 1943 Hitler began to pursue a policy of "scorched earth". Nevertheless, the Dnieper River, with its steep, steep western bank and low eastern bank occupied by Soviet troops, formed a serious natural obstacle in many areas. In some places, the width of the river was more than 3 kilometers.

The Red Army immediately tried to break through the line in order to prevent the German troops from strengthening for a long-term defense, launching a strategic offensive operation on a 300-kilometer front along the Dnieper. The line was particularly weak in the area north of the Black Sea, where it branched off from the Dnieper to cover the approaches to the Crimea. The Soviet Southern Front broke through the barely fortified line with relative ease, thereby cutting off the German 17th Army on the Crimean Peninsula from its route of withdrawal to the mainland. This was followed by the gradual establishment of several Soviet footholds across the Dnieper. Despite the fact that the crossing of the Dnieper was extremely difficult for the Red Army, the German troops were unable to throw off the Soviet troops from any bridgehead, which grew as troops were deployed to them. By the beginning of November 1943, Kyiv was liberated by the Red Army, which broke the line along the Dnieper, forcing the Wehrmacht to retreat to the Polish border in 1939.

The only part of the line that remained at the disposal of the Wehrmacht after 1943 was the northernmost part, the Panther line between Lake Peipus and the Baltic Sea at Narva. This small part of the line was attacked during the Battle of Narva, and the Baltic states and the Gulf of Finland remained in German hands well into 1944.

Thus, weak defensive positions along the Dnieper were able to slow down, but not stop the advance of the Soviet troops. The river was a significant obstacle, but the length of the defensive line made it difficult to defend. The inability of the Germans to eliminate the Soviet bridgeheads meant that this line would inevitably be broken. The much better fortified northern part of the defensive line turned out to be a more difficult task for the Red Army to break through it and was able to hold out for almost a year longer in comparison with its southern part. At the same time, the entire defensive line was more of a binding of field fortifications to favorable landscape conditions, rather than a fortification. Therefore, she was able to partially fulfill only the tactical tasks of the Wehrmacht, and absolutely did not influence the strategic plans - to strengthen herself on the occupied line for a long time, making it the eastern border of the Third Reich.