The staff also understood the discrepancy between the amount of work and the allotted time, so they gave me an extra 10 minutes. After 55 minutes of work, I solved 24 tasks without checking. I handed in my work and left in a terrible state, told my dad about everything. Dad turned to the administration, and without any dispute, I was allowed to write the work for as long as it took. I worked another 60 minutes. It was uncomfortable: it seemed to me that I was detaining people.

The answer sheet deserves special mention. It was standard, contained 26 points and did not correspond to the format of the work: in terms of the number of tasks, in the absence of a form for a detailed answer. All this had to be written on the back in free form. At subsequent diagnostics, I was also given this form, and it also did not coincide with the format of other works.

About a week later, we received an e-mail response with the results of the diagnostics (file attached). For each task, the table shows the topic of the task, the maximum score and the grade obtained. It turned out that I got a much lower mark than I expected. At the screening, we were given assignments and my work; again there were no specifications and evaluation criteria. In many ways, my mistakes turned out to be stupid - I myself wondered how I could write such a thing. We considered that some assignments were assessed incorrectly, and one assignment did not correspond to the standard program. Photographing was not allowed, a copy of the work was not provided.

At home, we prepared and submitted an appeal by e-mail, which remained unanswered. A little later, we received a certificate (the file is attached), which indicated the initial result. They refused to give us a certified sheet with a transcript of the results.

In addition to the above, it should be added that the impossibility of analyzing errors at home significantly reduces the educational value of such diagnostics. I was well prepared for the diagnosis, that's for sure, and counted on "5". At first the impression was so bad that I didn't want to go there anymore.

It should be noted that at this diagnostic, the administration and staff were interested in us, as in the SO-shniks. We were given a personal registration sheet, we were open to dialogue, we met halfway in everything that was not prohibited. Then the situation changed, but more on that next time.