After reading Mayakovsky's poem "Listen", it becomes clear that this is a kind of cry from the writer's soul. And it begins with a request that is addressed to the reader and other people. In his poem, he asks rhetorical questions, argues with himself, convincing through this that it is necessary to fight the impotence, grief and suffering that fill the whole world.

This poem became a kind of impetus for people who somehow lost faith in themselves, lost their way. Mayakovsky introduces God into the poem, but he is not an imaginary being, but a real person with strong, working hands. It is this God who provides assistance to the lyrical hero. Also in the poem there are "they" - people who have abandoned their attempts to reach for the stars. The poet draws a kind of comparison shown on the stars, because for some it is something more, called pearls, while for others the stars mean nothing.
It can be seen that the lyrical hero in this poem is very sensitive to the issues of the Earth and the situation with the world - he cares, he is trying to deal with impending problems.

When reading the poem, it is clear that the poet does not scold and does not teach people, but speaks from a pure heart - calmly, thereby confessing. With this tone, Mayakovsky wants to prove to the world that it is important for a person, first of all, a dream and a goal, and then everything else. The stars in this case are the dream that every person should strive for.

In the end, when the lyrical hero reaches his dream - he takes out a star, he understands that he is no longer afraid of anything.

Also, this poem raises the problem that a person began to forget what he lives for, succumbing to some false ideals, losing himself.

With his work, he pushes the reader to think about the question of the meaning of life, which each person sets for himself independently.

Analysis of the poem Listen! Mayakovsky

In this poem by Mayakovsky, his author's style is clearly manifested: a special construction of stanzas, an abundance of exclamations, energy ...

Here the poet addresses the listener to "You" or to the listeners: "Listen!" As often happens, Vladimir Mayakovsky uses a paradox at the heart of the verse: someone lights the stars. This is stated as an axiom, although the reader understands that the stars shine on their own. However, this paradox deeply hurts, because it is metaphorical, it is based on a comparison of a star with a spark, a candle (in a church), a lighthouse. There were many legends in antiquity that some kind deity kindles this light, and another extinguishes it. Something gives birth to life, something ends it...

From such a poetic axiom, the conclusion follows: who needs what the stars light up? Everything has a reason ... Mayakovsky expands the reader's consciousness, knocks him out of his usual thoughts.

And then the story of the One who needs the stars is drawn. As He resorts in blizzards of midday dust (this is how the hot summer sun appears in this oxymoron) to God himself, he is afraid that it is already too late. The petitioner even cries, kisses the hand of the Creator. (The working hand is "wiry".) And he asks, asks for at least one star. He swears he can't take the rejection. Here the poet uses the phrase "starless torment" as hopeless suffering. Then his psychological state changes somewhat. Having received, apparently, a positive answer, he is outwardly calm - he did everything in his power. But the petitioner is still very worried. And now he tells someone that there will be a Star. Necessarily.

Where is the clue: who needs the stars and why. (Mayakovsky makes it clear that he ignites from the Demiurge.) Everyone, probably, answered for himself. And yet, in the poem there is a Petitioner, to whom, indeed, this is important. But he also speaks with someone on "you". This interlocutor really needs the light of the stars ... someone should not be scared. Indeed, if the street is not pitch dark, if there is at least one star (at least a ray of hope in the situation), then it is not so scary. You can imagine the image of a woman or a child.

In the final, all the same questions sound again, but a little differently. After all, a star always lights up (even if it is not visible from the Earth), so someone needs it.

Interestingly, the atheist Mayakovsky speaks, in fact, about faith. The light that the Universe bares to people is equal to psychological hope. That is, the conclusion suggests itself that people need faith.

However, the questions in the poem remain rhetorical.

Analysis of the poem Listen! according to plan

Perhaps you will be interested

• Analysis of the poem I still love, I still languish Fet

  Fet's lyrics were often distinguished by elements of a philosophical attitude to reality and some sadness. As a rule, his melancholy moods are associated with the figure of Maria Lazich, the beloved he lost.

• Analysis of the poem Bunin's Mirror

  Reality and fiction are things that intersect, the line between them is rather blurred. The mirror is an image of a challenge to fate, it is a mystical element

• Analysis of Yesenin's poem I remember my beloved I remember

  The poem “I remember, my love, I remember” was written by Yesenin in 1925. According to many testimonies, it was dedicated to the actress Augusta Miklashevskaya. The poet, as you know, was a very amorous person, which was always reflected in his work.

• Analysis of the poem Prayer (I, the mother of God, now with a prayer) by Lermontov

  Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov expressed his requests in the form of a prayer in poetic form. He turns to the Mother of God on behalf of a wanderer with a plea for the protection of some girl, whom he calls "an innocent virgin."

• Analysis of the poem On Bunin's Pond

  The work, which describes the morning on a reservoir located near a small settlement, was written in 1887. The author is just starting his career and learn a lot from his mentor in the person of Fet

The futuristic poem "Understand Nothing" was written by V. Mayakovsky in 1913. At this time, the young poet led a somewhat outrageous and even hooligan lifestyle. He liked to shock the pious public and considered himself a literary genius, thinking that with the help of an unusual form any content can be transformed. The poem describes a scene from ordinary life and, although researchers have not found facts proving that this incident really happened to the poet, very it is easy to see Mayakovsky in the literary hero.

Reading the verse “They don’t understand anything” by Vladimir Vladimirovich Mayakovsky is fun, but it’s difficult to teach. The lyrical hero of the poem went into an ordinary barbershop and asked the master to comb his ... ears. Naturally, the hairdresser was at first confused, and then burst into abuse, which attracted the attention of many curious inhabitants. The scene would seem strange and absurd if it were not for the fact that the futurist Mayakovsky is trying to draw readers' attention to this trend in literature with its help and express regret about the fact that no one understands them, the futurists. Mayakovsky in this way denotes the problem of a young man who, because of his lop-earedness, is embarrassed to get acquainted with girls, especially since the poet himself was lop-eared, complexed about this, but later realized that no one UNDERSTANDS his torment, that no one cares about his mental anguish, so he simply stopped paying attention to this detail of his appearance.

The poem has a double bottom, and in order to understand its content, one must "plunge" into the life of Mayakovsky himself with his head. The text of Mayakovsky's poem "Understand Nothing" is published in full on our website. The book can be read online or downloaded. They study it at the lessons of literature in the 11th grade.

Lesson of studying and consolidating new material

Teacher Sergeeva O.S.

Lesson topic:“V.V. Mayakovsky. The origins of the rebellious spirit of early creativity or "a slap in the face of public taste".

The purpose of the lesson:"Formation of the reader's position in relation to the early work of V. Mayakovsky"

Board layout:

Theme, epigraph.

Preparation for the analysis of the poem "Could you?"

(FUTURUM - future). "Only we - the face of our time Steamboat of Modernity»

During the classes:

I want to be understood by my country.

V.V. Mayakovsky

At the beginning of the lesson, I would like to cast a spell on everyone in this audience.

Velimir Khlebnikov

Laughter spell

Oh, laugh, laughers!
Oh, laugh, laughers!
That they laugh with laughter, that they laugh with laughter.
Oh, laugh wickedly!
Oh, mocking laughs - the laughter of clever laughers!
Oh, laugh merrily, laughter of mocking laughers!
Smeyevo, smeyevo,
Smile, dare, laughers, laughers,
Laughs, laughs.
Oh, laugh, laughers!
Oh, laugh, laughers!
1910

What is unusual? (Content and form)

What is the root of all words? (Laugh)

No one will dispute that this poem is one of the most cheerful and positive, although at first glance it shocks. I want you to be positive in the lesson too.

This is Velimir Khlebnikov, one of the members of the seven poets, including Mayakovsky, who called themselves "people of the new life", and who spoke on December 18, 1912 with the program manifesto "Slap in the face of public taste." Later, under this name, a futuristic collection began to appear. These poets called themselves Futurists (FUTURUM - future). "Only we - the face of our time… The past is crowded. The Academy and Pushkin are more incomprehensible than hieroglyphs. Throw Pushkin, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy and so on and so forth. with Steamboat of Modernity»

Question: What would you say to these people if you heard them from the podium?

Do not rush to blame the "brisk" youth, let's figure it out together, maybe their bold goals still have their own values.

They wanted to bring art as close as possible to the understanding of the people, for which it was necessary to create a fundamentally new poetry in terms of content and forms.

In ordinary life, the arrival of everything new, which radically changes the prevailing stereotypes, causes a negative reaction. During the time of the Inquisition, people of science and, in general, people who think outside the box were burned at the stake. Humanity is inherently conservative. Often we reject everything that is incomprehensible to us: the movie is bad, the book is uninteresting, the person is stupid if he does not agree with me in his views, and much more. We forget to add the word BECAUSE to our statements. To add it, you need to answer the question “why”, and for this, in turn, you need to apply knowledge, analyze the situation, phenomenon, and then make your verdict with weighty arguments.

Especially pay attention to the epigraph to our lesson "I want to be understood by my country." So wrote V.V. Mayakovsky in his poem. Not recognized, not rejected, namely UNDERSTOOD. And that was the desire of his whole life. Let's try to understand the poet, not judge him superficially.

"Understand Nothing" Vladimir Mayakovsky

He went to the hairdresser, said - calm:

"Please, comb my ears."

Smooth hairdresser immediately became coniferous,

the face was drawn out like a pear.

"Crazy!

Ginger!"-

words jumped.

Swearing rushed from squeak to squeak,

and do-o-o-o-lgo

someone's head chuckled

plucking out of the crowd like an old radish.

Why was the hero scolded and ridiculed? For the fact that he asked not in the usual way, figuratively, putting a figurative meaning into what was said. He did not offend anyone (this is what the magic word “be kind” says). It just turned out to be not like everyone else, but, as it usually happens in life, no one wanted to understand this. If not like everyone else, it means bad.

Today we will talk about the early period of this poet's work, we will try to come to the realization and understanding of Mayakovsky. And right away we need to agree, not to take it literally. In sharp, rude at first glance, expressions contain meaning. Let's read between the lines. Perhaps we will decipher what his lyrical hero is telling us about and not become like a hairdresser from a poem.

Question: What poems or poems by Mayakovsky do you know?

The little son came to his father and asked the little one, What is Good and what is Bad?

Eat pineapples, chew grouse, Your last day is coming, bourgeois!

Shine always, Shine everywhere Until the last days of the bottom. Shine! And no nails! Here is my slogan and the sun!

………….

Exercise: Let's go back to the tutorial article you read earlier. Take the prepared sheets. Answer the questions. For now, do the bare minimum, i.e. assignment for grade "3"

From the course of history, we know that in Russia, starting from the end of the 19th century, a pre-revolutionary situation developed. In 1908, Mayakovsky left the gymnasium, devoting himself to underground revolutionary work. At the age of fifteen, he joined the Bolshevik Party, carried out propaganda tasks. Arrested three times; in 1909 he was imprisoned in Butyrskaya prison in solitary confinement. There he began to write poetry. From 1911 he studied at the Moscow School of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture. In 1912 he published his first poem - "Night" - in the futuristic collection "A Slap in the Face of Public Taste".

Night

Crimson and white discarded and crumpled,

handfuls of ducats were thrown into the green,

and the black palms of the runaway windows

handed out burning yellow cards.

Boulevards and squares were not strange

see blue togas on the buildings.

And before running like yellow wounds,

the lights adorned the legs with bracelets.

Crowd - variegated fast cat -

floated, curving, drawn by the doors;

everyone wanted to drag at least a little

a mass of laughter from a cast coma.

I, feeling the dresses calling paws,

squeezed a smile into their eyes, frightening

with blows to the tin, the Arabs laughed,

above the forehead, the wing of a parrot blossomed.

Conclusion: the literary process has always and at all times been a reflection of the historical process, therefore, the revolutionary situation in society is the revolutionary situation in literature.

Innovation. Mayakovsky's verse is based not on the music of rhythm, but on semantic stress, on intonation. The number of syllables in a line lost its decisive significance for Mayakovsky, the organizing role of rhyme increased and changed qualitatively, the colloquial nature of the verse, perceived primarily by ear, from the voice, in a wide audience, was sharply revealed. Researchers will later call his verse accent.

Therefore, Mayakovsky owns the largest since the time of Pushkin, a fundamentally new step in the development of Russian poetry.

Open the poem "Could you?"

I read a poem (we analyze together)

AND YOU COULD?
I immediately smeared the map of everyday life,
splashing paint from a glass;
I showed on a platter of jelly
oblique cheekbones of the ocean.
On the scales of a tin fish
read I the call of new lips.
And you
nocturne play
we could
on the drainpipe flute?
(1913) .

Which word occurs three times in the text? (pronoun "I")

What pronoun is the opposite of "I"? (you)

Let's assume what words define the hero's position in life? (paint, nocturne, flute - creative). What about the "you" position? (card, dish, jelly - household)

Pay attention to the support with the analysis of this poem. It will help you with your own analysis of the poem.

Read the poem "Listen!"

Listen!
After all, if the stars are lit -

So - someone wants them to be?
So - someone calls these spittles
pearl?
And, tearing up
in blizzards of midday dust,
rushes to god
afraid of being late
crying
kisses his sinewy hand,
asks -
to have a star! -
swears -
will not endure this starless torment!
And then
walks anxious,
but calm on the outside.
Says to someone:
"Are you okay now?
Not scary?
Yes?!"
Listen!
After all, if the stars
ignite -
Does that mean anyone needs it?
So, it is necessary
so that every evening
over the rooftops
lit up at least one star ?!
1914

Let's work on it verbally according to the given scheme.

The poem begins with a rhetorical exclamation-request. What? (Listen!)

Subject- “What (about whom) does the work say?”

Problem:"What question

Do your own writing on the poem "I Love"

Analysis of the poem "Could You?"

Lyrical hero - "I".

"You" are other people.

Paint is color.

Dish - dishes.

Nocturne is a piece of music.

The jelly is a cold jelly-like snack.

Flute is a musical instrument.

The map is the routine.

Conclusion: the poem is built on antithesis (opposition)

"I" chooses a free, raging ocean, sees its mysterious outlines in a dish of jelly, and it doesn't cost him anything to play a nocturne on a drainpipe.

"You" live differently, see things as they are.

"I" is not fenced off from everyday life - he just knows how to transform it, color it, enrich it

“You” are content with food, the daily routine, do not know how and, moreover, do not want to transform life.

Conclusion: This poem is microcosm of early Mayakovsky. It gives movement to the two most important images of creativity: “I” with its “sharp vision” and attraction to the bright, sunny world of the ocean, ships, stars, outlandish birds, ostriches and “You”, endowed with “scanty” vision, choosing shell houses , cottages, bank account, jelly, borscht. The first image is always heroized in opposition to the world, the second is sharply satirical.

The poem ends rhetorical question, suggesting different answers depending on who will answer it. In this case, yes or no, plus a variety of justifications.

Subject - " About what (about whom) does it say in the work?

About a hero who knows how to transform everyday life and the rest of society, living according to the usual schedule.

The hero opposes himself and his vivid vision of the world to everything boring, gray, dull, everyday, than the rest live.

Problem: " What question(questions) are posed in the work? This question involves various answers, ways out of the current situation (usually this is a life situation)

Whose life should be a role model? Why?

What good (bad) can be seen in this or that position?

And etc.

FULL NAME_______________________________________________________________________

Grade "3"

Years of life

How many years did he live?

In what country was he born?

In what village?

How many children were in the family?

What were the parents doing? What are the leading character traits of the father and mother?

What did the children in the family do?

Why did the family move to Moscow?

Who was the first to call V. Mayakovsky a brilliant poet?

When did he join the futurists?

Rating "4"

Subject - " About what (about whom) does it say in the work?

Problem: " What question(questions) are posed in the work? This question involves various answers, ways out of the current situation (usually this is a life situation)

Rating "5"

What thoughts and feelings does this poem evoke in you? (do the work on the back).

In the early poems of Mayakovsky, depicting a modern city, there is a passionate protest against the capitalist way of life. The theme of the tragedy of human existence under capitalism permeates Mayakovsky's largest works of the pre-revolutionary years - the tragedy "Vladimir Mayakovsky", the poems "A Cloud in Pants", "Spine Flute", "War and Peace".

Mayakovsky, barely stepping over the draft age, was already talking about the eternity of his poetry:
My scream in the granite of time is beaten out
and it will rumble and rumble,
because of
in a heart scorched like Egypt,
there are a thousand thousand pyramids!
("Me and Napoleon", 1915).

But then he already predicted his tragic death:
More and more I think
wouldn't it be better to put
bullet point at its end.
("Flute - spine", 1915).

Or:
After so many, so many years
- in a word, I will not survive -
I'll die of hunger
I'll get under the gun...
("Giveaway", 1916).

Homeless Velimir Khlebnikov "died of hunger". And Mayakovsky, "having stood under the gun, put a point of a bullet at his end."<…>

In early 1930, Mayakovsky joined the Association of Proletarian Writers, adherents of socialist realism, and therefore completely opposed to Mayakovsky's poetic concepts. On March 16, there was a catastrophic failure of the production of "The Bath". On March 25, he applied for a new permit to travel to Paris, to which he finally became attached, despite his poems. However, the Soviet authorities, having familiarized themselves with The Bedbug and The Bathhouse, realized that Mayakovsky may indeed have decided to "live and die" in Paris and, perhaps, to tell some truth about the Soviet regime there. Travel abroad, this time, was forbidden to him.
Mayakovsky's poetry is dead. This was a decisive fact in his biography. Romantic failure (in love) should be added here. Then the approaching police threats.
On April 14, Mayakovsky shot himself.
He was 37 years old. Fatal age: Raphael, Byron, Pushkin, Van Gogh, Khlebnikov died at this age ...
After Mayakovsky's suicide, Stalin limited himself to only one phrase:
"Mayakovsky is and will remain the best and most capable poet of our Soviet era, and indifference to his memory and his works is a crime."

Many Soviet critics talked about how talented, universally recognized, happy he was, but ...
A happy life never leads to suicide.

Conclusion: The most important task of the lesson for me was the task for each of you to form your own opinion about the work of the poet. I wanted to show you him as a person who is also worthy of respect and has the right to his own position, even if it is not similar to the position of others. And first of all, the fact that he was true to himself until his death, did not adjust, did not submit, is worthy of respect. Unhappy in life, rejected by the literary elite, he remained forever young in our memory. And by the way, I would like to say that he himself loved the youth very much, and the youth understood and accepted him.

I want to thank everyone for their attention and for the work separately……………………………

Grades will be given after checking the written work in the next lesson.

Vladimir Vladimirovich Mayakovsky

He went to the hairdresser, said - calm:
"Please, comb my ears."
Smooth hairdresser immediately became coniferous,
the face was drawn out like a pear.

"Crazy!
Ginger!"-
words jumped.
Swearing rushed from squeak to squeak,
and do-o-o-o-lgo
someone's head chuckled
plucking out of the crowd like an old radish.

Vladimir Mayakovsky

The early works of Vladimir Mayakovsky are designed in the spirit of futurism. The poet remained faithful to this direction until the end of his life, although he changed his views on poetry, recognizing that before him in Russian literature there were many outstanding people worthy of going down in history.

However, the young Mayakovsky did not bother with such philosophical reflections, believing that with the help of the form it is possible to transform any content. Therefore, his poems often wore a shade of hooliganism. However, in ordinary life, the poet was not distinguished by a calm disposition. He could joke publicly in such a way that the object of his attention burned with shame, or go out into the street barefoot to shock the pious public. The poem “Understand Nothing”, written in 1913, belongs to this period of Mayakovsky’s life and work. It is a short sketch from life, although there is no evidence that such an incident actually took place in the life of the poet. Nevertheless, the scene that took place in the barbershop is presented so vividly and figuratively that there is no doubt that Mayakovsky was really a direct participant in it and deliberately provoked a conflict.

It all starts with the fact that the poet asks the hairdresser to comb his ears. Moreover, he addresses the master calmly and extremely politely. However, looking at the strange visitor, “the hairdresser immediately became coniferous, his face stretched out like a pear”, it is natural that after such an offer he burst into abuse at the joy of curious passers-by, whose heads continually flashed outside the window, “pulling out of the crowd like an old radish.

Now it is worth returning to the title of the poem itself, in which the author has invested the main meaning of the entire work. If we consider it from the point of view of futurism, then Mayakovsky just wanted to say that no one simply understands him and other poets who are adherents of this direction. And in order to convey this idea to the readers, an absurd scene was played before them. However, the poet's desire to have combed ears hides the usual complex of a young man who was embarrassed to meet girls because of his excessive lop-earedness. And this is exactly what Mayakovsky wanted to tell in his poem, overflowing with personal experiences that others simply refused to notice.

Years passed, and the poet also stopped paying attention to his lack of appearance, but at the same time he became stronger in the idea that no one needs him at all, and not a single person in the world cares about his emotional experiences hidden under the mask of indifference.

The poem "Night" by Mayakovsky. Analysis.

A conversation about the lyrics of the early Mayakovsky usually begins with the poem "Night", the very one that the poet wrote about in his biography as "the first professional one." What is "Crimson and White ..." about? It is difficult for a layman with a primitive, non-artistic mindset to understand a poet, and often “be mindful” causes nothing but irritation, although in general the beginning of the poem is quite clear. The colors of the day fade, recede into the background. Green twilight sky, stars are lit, "blue togas" on buildings ...

But already in the second stanza, an image that is not always clear arises: “Even before, running like yellow wounds, / the lights hung bracelets on their legs ...” What did the poet see here? After all, Mayakovsky is an artist who cannot stand the “beautiful”, And he is very accurate in every detail depicted. They tell about his dialogue with David Burliuk about a line from the poem "From the street to the street": "The magician pulls the rails from the mouth of the tram." To Burliuk’s remark, they say, the tram should devour the rails, Mayakovsky replied: “David, you are not standing there. You stand on the back platform and look!” So how did these "bracelets" on the legs appear? It is clear that this is light. But where is the source of this light? Neither the moon, nor street lamps can "wrap legs with bracelets" - they give diffused light, and here "bracelets", a narrow strip of light. This is no longer the case in a modern city, but this is Moscow

1912, Gilyarovsky's Moscow! And this light, this light from the basement windows, rising only at the very edge above the ground, of course, is a trifle and relates rather indirectly to understanding the idea of ​​the poem, but how important and sometimes interesting all sorts of "unimportance"!

Together with the poet, having passed through the outskirts of Moscow, we go out to the city center. Fashionable restaurants, expensive shops, joyful, happy, discharged public:

Crowd, variegated fast cat,

floated, curving, drawn by the doors;

everyone wanted to drag at least a little

a mass of laughter from a cast coma.

Wonderful image - the crowd-cat!

in Mayakovsky, the word is often ambiguous and creates an image at the level of the subconscious, associations. A motley crowd is a "motley-haired" cat. But this is only the first layer. Cat - what is she? Graceful, flexible (that's why the crowd floats, wriggling), soft, "homely" - and at the same time predatory, aggressive, subject to incomprehensible instincts.

And now let's try to imagine an eighteen-year-old boy, a beggar, ragged, but with a claim to an invaluable genius, eager for recognition, not alien to shocking; which combines the subconscious fear of being different from everyone else, and then the unwillingness to be like everyone else. And all this is superimposed on the desire to love and be loved - at the same time with boyish complexes. Sometimes it can be interesting to compare with some phenomena of modern youth culture, because in the minds of schoolchildren there is often a gap between the work being studied and the reality surrounding it. In one of the compositions of Vyacheslav Petkun there are lines: “I am walking towards the colored shop windows, expensive limousines are passing by; women rush through them with burning eyes, with cold hearts, with golden hair. The same “city of a fairy tale, city of a dream” appears before the lyrical hero of Mayakovsky. And if you look, two poets write about the same thing. Perhaps the most difficult is the last stanza, and especially its last two lines:

I, feeling the dresses calling paws,

squeezed a smile into their eyes; frightening

with blows to the tin, the Arabs laughed,

above the forehead, the wing of a parrot blossomed.

It is in this stanza that the key to understanding the whole poem. Here is a fleeting glance of a beauty dressed in furs, accompanied by a fat rich man, getting out of a car, a look that combines sensual interest and contempt for a beggar ragamuffin, and a poet’s response, combining contempt for “looking like an oyster from the shell of things” with passion, which is akin to malice. The verb “squeezed” is interesting, containing a certain indication of resistance, the poet seems to make his way into a world alien to him. But this world does not accept the "rude Hun", and the "butterfly of the poet's heart" is crushed. What happened to the hero at the end of the poem? What are these araps with the wing of a parrot above their foreheads, why do they “laugh with blows to the tin”?

Let's return to a kind of video sequence created by the poet. Several styles appeared in expensive Moscow establishments at the beginning of the century, and two dominated among them: classical, old Russian, with a gray-bearded gatekeeper in medals, and modern, attracting with extraordinary, exotic, where young araps in caps decorated with bright feathers served as doormen.

The task of the doorman is to “hold and not let go”, to cut off unwanted elements that destroy the illusion of the serenity of life, and the doors to the world shining with lights slam shut in front of a strange young man in a yellow blouse.

The same theme of the conflict between the lyrical hero and the world around him sounds not only in this poem. Here, for example, "Understand nothing." Again the "strange" line: I went to the hairdresser, said - calm:

"Be kind, comb my ears!" What is here, just shocking the reading public? Let's try to ask a question, what is a "hairdresser", what does he do? Of course, she cuts, makes beautiful, in other words, embellishes, smoothes, cuts off whirlwinds, irregularities, roughness, levels, "cuts everyone one size fits all." -Hairdresser ”is a society that puts a person in a certain framework, tight for a lyrical hero, he is not like the others, he is -unkempt-, his ears stick out! And yet he strives to be understood and accepted by the world, And if for this it is necessary to "be combed", he will try! But here is the reaction of society: “A smooth hairdresser immediately became coniferous, / his face stretched out like a pear ...” The word “smooth” In Russian is very ambiguous. This is both “smooth”, “non-rough”, and “well-fed”, “burly”, “well-fed”, hence the association with pink. (In Bunin's "Antonov apples" the headman is smooth, like a Kholmogory cow.) And "coniferous" is clearly the antonym of "smooth": green, prickly, needle-like, bristling. The world of well-fed and self-satisfied bourgeois does not accept the lyrical hero, in the mind of the layman he is a jester, a clown, a "redhead". The “flabby radish” of their heads cannot understand and accept a person who is not like them.