Depth psychology main provisions and representatives. Key concepts of the concept

What is depth psychology and why is depth psychology "deep"?

Abstract of a lecture given in the summer of 1999 at the Institute of Biology and Human Psychology, St. Petersburg.

The term "depth psychology" (from German Tiefenpsychologie) was proposed by Eugene Bleiler in 1913 to refer to the "new science" - psychoanalysis. It is an umbrella term for a number of different psychological theories that explore the relationship between consciousness and the unconscious, and refers to psychotherapeutic systems developed by Pierre Janet, William James, Sigmund Freud, Alfred Adler and Carl Jung. Although the concept of the unconscious was used long before the advent of psychoanalysis - in particular, by mesmerists and hypnotists (Ellenberger, 2001), - its first "deep" justification, and even with a claim to scientificity, it received in the works of Freud. The interest of both the creator of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, and the founder of analytical psychology, Carl Jung, was especially concentrated around the concept of the unconscious. At the same time, the attention of researchers was transferred from the activity of dividing the observed things to considering them in depth- vision has been replaced by "penetration". "Depth" refers to what is below the surface of psychic manifestations: behavior, conflicts, relationships, dreams, social, religious and political events, in which soul dynamics are reflected. This "what" includes some deep fantasies or figurative systems that are inaccessible to a number of literalist approaches that do not recognize, in particular, the unconscious mental as a metaphor, and the mental as reality. The expression "seeing through" has taken on an analytic form. The new field of knowledge also received a new foundation, less focused on physical connections and concentrated primarily on philosophy and metaphysics in its quest for more deep understanding the essence of things.

But this new foundation was not at all new, but, on the contrary, very old, dating back to the works of Heraclitus (6th century BC), in which the concepts of depth and soul were linked together:

“You will not find the boundaries of the soul (psyche), no matter which path you take: its measure (logos) is so deep” (Fragments of Early Greek Philosophers, 1989, p. 231).

The Heraclitean image of “deep” denotes the specificity of the soul and the sphere of mental activity: it has its own dimension, which does not fit into the concept of physical space.

We can assume that since the advent of psychoanalysis in European history, the psychic has come into being and the soul has acquired its quality and dimension. The study of the soul has come to mean going "in depth," because whenever we move into the psychological depth, the soul is involved in this movement. Soul Logos, or psychology, implies a journey through the mental labyrinth, moving through which we never get deep enough.

Since its inception, depth psychology has been busy listening to what is relegated to the back of culture and individual consciousness, whether it be painful symptoms or various forms of political or cultural resistance, including mass riots - the language of an unheard condition left unheeded. The tendency of such a language, be it personal, cultural, archetypal, ecological or spiritual, is, according to Jung's statement, the construction of this or that myth, dressed in clothes appropriate to time and culture.

Carl Jung built his own version of depth psychology and addressed it to those people for whom the traditional rites, rituals and symbols that have developed in their cultures have ceased to carry numinous energy, retain a divine charge, and accumulate the “living water” of spiritual experiences.

After Freud's seminal work The Interpretation of Dreams appeared in 1900, the existence of the unconscious became a psychological fact. Depth psychology postulates the general notion that consciousness is just the tip of a huge iceberg called mental. The elucidation of a more precise nature of the unconscious and its constituent elements led to the emergence of various schools and trends in depth psychology - various levels of "depths".

Beneath the conscious mind lies a vast layer of forgotten or repressed personal memories, feelings, and actions, which Jung called the personal unconscious.

In Freud, the unconscious contains various forms of forgotten or repressed feelings and actions, instincts and memories in the form of a personal unconscious, which has emotional and somatic properties and manifests itself in a complex form (Oedipus, Electra, castration).

“However, the essence of the unconscious is not fully embraced by the concept of the personal unconscious. If the unconscious were only personal, then it would be theoretically possible to reduce all fantasies in mental illness to individual experiences and impressions. Undoubtedly, most of this material can be reduced to the history of personal life, but there are such fantasies, the origins of which are in vain to look for in individual history. What are these fantasies? In one word, it is - mythological fantasies. There are fantasies that do not correspond to any personal experience, but only to myths" (Jung, cw, vol. ten).

With Jung, this personal unconscious is based on an even deeper level - the collective unconscious or objective psyche - a boundless ocean, vast, much older than the individual life cycle, filled with archetypes: primordial images and actions that are repeated over and over again throughout history. only of mankind, but also from the very beginning of life in general. As Jung said: "... The deeper you go, the wider the base becomes."

Archetypes have not only emotional or psychosomatic qualities, but also psychic and spiritual qualities that appear everywhere in visions, ecstasy, meditation, dreaming and synchronic manifestations.

Synchrony is a Jungian term for meaningful coincidences that make up the overtone of a deep psychological experience. The objective psyche in Jung's understanding also forms a kind of guiding, organizing center, or Self, very reminiscent of the "inner god" or the Hindu Purusha, the first man from which the elements of the cosmos, the world soul, the "I" and the world of multiple things that tend to repeat (Friedrich Nietzsche).

Depth psychology in its most general form operates according to the following assumptions:

1) Any psychological activity arises on the basis of a fantasy or an image (Freud’s “primary process”, “the image is the mental”, according to Jung).

2) The human mind is the site of the interaction of dynamic unbridled forces associated with the somatic base.

3) Mental is process- in other words, rather a verb than a noun - partly conscious and partly unconscious.

4) The unconscious, in turn, carries repressed experiences and other contents of the personal level, as well as transpersonal (i.e., collective, not related to the Self, archetypal) contents, carried into the psyche by the deep forces of "anima mundi", - the world souls.

5) The psychic is not reducible either to neurochemical processes or to a "higher" spiritual reality; its role and mission is to be the “third”, middle principle between matter and spirit, otherwise called “soul”, the principle that requires its own language for its expression. This principle of psychic reality is known in analytical psychology as the "objective psyche" (Jung).

Archetypal psychologists, who represent an offshoot of classical Jungian psychology, view the intermediate quality of the objective psyche as "liminal" or "figurative" ("imaginal").

The main obstacle to the integration of depth psychology and academic psychology is the deterministic bias inherent in the academic approach and materialistic thinking in general. However, the archetypal psychology now developing in Russia recognizes the free and unique essence of the human soul and nature and re-formulates the achievements of rationalistic and materialistic psychology in a deep psychological light.

Since the psyche constitutes its own realm of experience and experience, it must be studied by methods that take into account its autonomy. Examples of such methods are the interpretation of symbols and symptoms, the analysis of dreams, depth-oriented studies of culture and mythology.

The psychic spontaneously generates mytho-religious symbols and by its nature is both spiritual and instinctive manifestations. The consequence of such a myth-generating function is the absence of a choice between a spiritual and a non-spiritual person. The only question is: where do we direct our spirituality? Do we live this spirituality consciously or do we invest it unknown to ourselves in non-spiritual projects (perfectionism, addictions, greed, fame, etc.) that eventually take over us due to the fact that we ignore these frightening and powerful numinous forces?

Any symptoms are important messages addressed to the individual, and they should be carefully considered ("read") - if necessary, contact an analyst or psychotherapist - but not hushed up. (Jung wrote, "The gods have become diseases.") A symptom is one of the ways the psyche notifies us that we are not listening to voices from its depths.

After Freud and Jung, the human psyche found even greater depths in the works of modern successors of the Jungian tradition: the archetypal psychology of James Hillman, his followers and associates (P. Kugler, L. Zoya, W. Gigeriech, M. Adams, G. Mogenson, J. Paris and others), in spiritual psychology (Sardello, 1995), ecopsychology (Roszak, 1992).

In all of these writers, the rational, purposive human mind, the waking consciousness, or "gift of reason" appears as only one player in the larger field of the psyche. Depth psychology approaches human experience and experience in terms of multiple interpretations and expressions.

Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose and Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code have become the undoubted bestsellers of recent years, giving new life to the study of symbols. The reader saw that life is not at all empty and does not come down to mechanical “work for the good of the Motherland”, but that it is full of meaning, has many different goals and has an “archetypal resonance”, an archetypal echo is heard in it.

There is a "place of meaningful experience" where the poles of the personal and transpersonal psyches meet; this place is defined as soul. Hillman considers this place as an imaginative deepening and transformation of events into experiences. One of the goals of today's depth psychology is to bring the soul back into psychology.

Soul seen as subjectivity, which is spilled everywhere; everything has its own "inside" - an idea coming from Schopenhauer and Teilhard de Chardin.

Depth psychology rejects as philosophically archaic the absolute Cartesian split between self and otherness and instead introduces a changing interactive field of subjective and objective activities. For example, projection is seen as an imaginal dance in the space between the "sender" and the "receiver".

The applied aspect of interactivity lies in the fact that "objective" research is limited in its application to the mental and even misleading by the fact that we ourselves change everything that we investigate.

Empirical research reveals only those facets and aspects of the psyche that are somehow amenable to quantitative measurement. Depth psychology deconstructs this "as if" empiricism, presenting the psychic, which studies itself, as a kind of "mirror room" or "hall with mirrors." In it consciousness, sensitive to its own relativity, participates in a constant and never-ending reflection of current realities.

Traditional deep psychological thought carries with it all the sexist disinformation, cultural predilections and biases of the 19th century. Today's depth psychology criticizes the equalization of biological and cultural sex, frees itself from theoretical concepts and ideas that support old stereotypes regarding women and men (for example, the mother is considered the primary source of psychopathology, the woman is identified with passive Yin, and the man with active Yang, etc. d.), and explores the psyche in its personal, biological, cultural and archetypal contexts.

In its extreme expression, all people, all minds and all human lives are in one way or another embedded in a certain myth-making. Mythology is not at all a set, and not even a system or complex of obsolete explanations of natural events that once took place in the world; it is, above all, the very wealth and wisdom of mankind, expressed in the amazing, amazing, wonderful and symbolic telling of all kinds of stories.

Personal symptoms, individual conflicts, obsession with something have a mythical or transpersonal core that, when interpreted, can reacquaint the client with the meaning of his struggle (for example, the pain that accompanies leaving home can be transformed into an ageless and eternal adventure a wanderer who goes in search of the unknown). Everyone knows for himself how the sadness of parting on the station platform is gradually transformed into curiosity for the neighbors in the compartment. The danger in striving only for the transpersonal turns into inflation of the Ego (spiritual "detour" and New Age gingerbread); the danger in reductive focusing (reductive concentration) on the personal leads to a narcissistic devaluation of spiritual experiences. (Jung, 2006a).

Depth psychology arose as a movement to cleanse the world of the debris of past delusions. It is opposed to the death of perception as such, or to identification with mental numbness or immobility. It draws attention to what the colonial-hierarchical Ego represses, ignores, silences and suppresses in itself after contact: internal and external voices and images and movements from the transcendent stream of consciousness. This is the psychotherapeutic purpose of depth psychology, and from this point of view perspective healing is a form of decolonization.

Because there is a psychic share in everything that surrounds us. We are healthy and whole only to the extent that we care about our environment and are able to take responsibility for the world in which we live.

Depth psychologists believe that the ego consciousness, our daytime self, is not the master of the psychological house. As early as the beginning of the last century, this was proved by Carl Jung in studies of associations that led to the emergence of the theory of complexes, in which the subject, along with the usual reactions to the stimulus word, could suddenly give too long an answer. Such a reaction, along with a host of other deviations in responses, was associated with specific emotions, memories, repressed experiences, which we now call complexes. Subsequently, the metaphorical nature and internal drama of the complexes allowed the current archetypal psychologists to establish their approach to the mental, based on the notion of the "poetic basis of the mind" (Hillman, 2006, p. 31).

The "poetic basis of the mind" thesis was first put forward by Hillman in his lectures at Yale University in 1972. They stated, among other things, that archetypal psychology "begins not with the physiology of the brain, the structure of language, the organization of society, or the analysis of behavior, but with the processes of imagination." The relationship between psychology and artistic imagination is due to the nature of the mind. Thus, Hillman argues, the most fruitful approach to the study of the mind relies on the diverse responses of the imagination, where images are given the greatest freedom, as well as the opportunity to consider them.

Hillman, in his developments of archetypal psychology, decided to get rid of the dogmatism of Jung's Self. He declared that our psychological depths are inhabited by archetypes, but all of them have complete autonomy and, ultimately, they do not accept any organizing center. In other words, spiritual depths are polycentric, and if the Self exists, then the best manifestation of respect for it will be to refrain from the intention to dictate certain rules of behavior to it. According to Hillman, the archetype and God in the classical (antique or polytheistic) sense turn out to be one and the same. In addition, when discussing the mental, he uses the word "soul", which saturates with related concepts. He's writing:

“…these terms constitute the everyday practical language of the analyst, form the context for his root metaphor [soul] and are its expressions. Other words that have long been associated with the word "soul" further deepen its meaning: mind, spirit, heart, life, warmth, humanity, personality, individuality, intentionality, essence, innermost, purpose, emotion, quality, virtue, morality, sin. , wisdom, death, God. The soul is said to be "alarmed", "old", "incorporeal", "immortal", "lost", "innocent", "inspired". About the eyes - that they are "soulful", for they are the "mirror of the soul"; but a person can be "soulless" if he is unable to show compassion. Even the most ancient languages ​​have developed notions of principles, which ethnologists translate as soul. From the ancient Egyptians to the modern Eskimos, "soul" is a highly differentiated idea that refers to a reality that has a huge impact on a person. The soul is imagined as the inner man and as the inner sister or spouse, the seat or voice of God within; as a cosmic force in which all mankind and even all living creatures participate as created by God and thus divine; as consciousness, as multiplicity and as unity in opposition; like harmony, liquid, fire, dynamic energy, etc. Anyone can "search for his soul", and everyone's soul can be "tested". There are parables describing the possession of the soul (by demons or the devil) and the sale of the soul to the devil, the temptation of the soul, the curse and resurrection of the soul, the development of the soul through spiritual practices, the journey of the soul. Attempts have been made to locate the soul in individual organs of the body or its regions, to trace its development from sperm or egg, to divide it into animal, vegetable and inorganic components, while the search for the soul always leads to the “depths”.” (Hillman, 2004a, pp. 105–106).

On the contrary, Robert Sardello seeks to free the "soul" from the limitations of Hillman's thought. In particular, he denies the idea of ​​an archetypal soul rooted in Hellenistic culture.

According to Sardello (in many respects resurrecting Vladimir Solovyov's ideas about the meaning of love and God-manhood), the imaginal ability of our being can be best appreciated when the soul serves not so much past gods or the Self, but when it seeks co-creation with the world of a deeper cultural future, based on as far as possible, on Love. He points out that “for people who lived in past times, the care of the soul was natural and instinctive, maintained through the rituals of ceremony, mystery centers, the oral tradition of the transmission of stories, myths, through art and technology” (Sardello, 1995, p. 7 ).

Finally, Theodor Roszak, the author of the book The Voice of the Earth, who proposed that we return the “depth” found in the collective psyche back to nature and the cosmos, can also be counted among the depth psychologists. Roszak argues that the health of the entire environment of our planet and the psychological health of mankind are in close connection with each other, that one cannot be complete and safe without the other. It testifies that humanity is close to collective madness (if not completely crazy) in its relation to nature and, more broadly, to the biosphere. Roszak argues that we have tremendous power capable of causing irreparable harm to everything that we are called upon to preserve by our very lives, and we tirelessly do this harm to the planet and to ourselves. This indicates that the culture "has gone berserk in the frenzy with which it exploits natural resources and destroys all life in the way of this exploitation, and ultimately kills itself" (Roszak, 1992, p. 70).

Based on the ideas of Jung, Hillman and Sardello about the built-in of human psychology in nature, Roszak in his statements closes the full cycle of the return of the soul from its journey already in the form of the world soul or Anima Mundi. He considers Jung's idea of ​​the collective unconscious as the most useful for the formation of a new discipline - ecopsychology (ibid., p. 102). Today we call ecopsychological theory Gaia. The Earth itself is a living being, and it acquires consciousness as we acquire this consciousness.

“The collective unconscious, at its deepest level, hides the ecological intelligence of all biological and geological species and forms, the source from which, ultimately, all our culture unfolds” (ibid., p. 301).

From the book The Structure of Magic (in 2 volumes) by Richard Bandler

DEEP STRUCTURE AND BEYOND As has been repeatedly said, people who come to a therapist and want help to change usually come to him because they feel they don't have enough choice, that "they are not able to behave

From the book Runner with Wolves. Female archetype in myths and legends author Estes Clarissa Pinkola

From the book Entertaining Psychology author Shapar Viktor Borisovich

CHAPTER 15 TRACKING: CANTO HONDO, THE DEEP SONG Tracking means walking lightly, stepping silently, and thereby being able to move freely through the forest, noticing everything, but remaining invisible. The she-wolf hunts down everyone and everything that invades her territory. This is her way

From the book History of Psychology. Crib author Anokhin N V

What is psychology Apparently, people began to think about the existence of some kind of spiritual ideal that guides their behavior in the distant prehistoric times. People of that period already possessed the basic qualities: they walked on two legs, were omnivores, knew how to

From the book Transpersonal Project: Psychology, Anthropology, Spiritual Traditions Volume II. Russian transpersonal project author Kozlov Vladimir Vasilievich

60 DEPTH PSYCHOLOGY Depth psychology is the general name for a wide variety of concepts in psychiatry and psychology. These concepts are based on the position of the leading role of irrational, unconscious, instinctive,

From the book The Way to the Fool. Book one. Philosophy of Laughter. author Kurlov Grigory

37. Philosophical anthropology and depth psychology of P. Gurevich Pavel Semenovich Gurevich – specialist in philosophical anthropology, psychoanalysis, philosophy of culture and modern Western philosophy; Doctor of Philology and Doctor of Philosophy, Professor.

From the book Neurotic Personality of Our Time by Karen Horney

"INTERNAL LAUGHTER" DEEP DISCHARGE OF LAUGHTER PROGRAMS BY THIN SHELLS

From the book Creation of Consciousness. Jung's myth for modern man. author Edinger Edward

Chapter 5 Anxiety can be entirely explained by the current conflict situation. If, however, in character neurosis we are confronted with an anxiety-producing situation, we always have to take into account previous

From the book Intelligence: instructions for use author Sheremetiev Konstantin

From the book What is psychology [in two volumes] the author Godefroy Jo

Sign 2. Calm deep joy You feel pleasure not only from the small joys of life: you ate ice cream or managed to jump on a departing bus, but you feel the joy of life that comes from the very depths of your soul. And this joy does not overshadow

From the book Kabbalistic Visions the author Drob Sanford

Chapter 2. What is psychology? Introduction According to Coppens (1983), early humans already possessed many of our “qualities”: they walked on two legs, were omnivorous, adaptable, skilled in crafts, socialized, cunning, and

From the book Dramatherapy the author Valenta Milan

CHAPTER 1 Kabbalah and Depth Psychology When Carl Gustav Jung was asked in his later years to comment on "the importance of Freud's Jewish background in the development, content, and acceptance of psychoanalysis," Jung replied that in order to adequately answer this

From the book Ways Beyond the "Ego" author Walsh Roger

3.4.1. Depth psychotherapy Depth psychotherapy is associated primarily with the work of three scientists who undoubtedly occupy a place of honor at the top of the psychotherapeutic Olympus, namely, the psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud, the individual psychology of Alfred Adler and

From the book Process Mind. A Guide to Connecting with the Mind of God author Mindell Arnold

DEEP ECOLOGY: LIVING AMONG SIGNIFICANT NATURE Bill Devall and George Sessions

Depth psychology

1. General characteristics of depth psychology.

  1. Psychoanalysis by Z. Freud.
  2. Analytical psychology of C.G. Jung.
  3. Individual psychology of A. Adler.
  4. Neo-Freudianism (K. Horney, E. Fromm, G. Sullivan and others).

Depth psychology- this is a group of directions in modern foreign psychology, focused mainly on unconscious mechanisms psyche.

General provisions of depth psychology are based on theories Z. Freud, K. G. Jung, A. Adler, while somewhat generalizing and expanding the boundaries of each of the theories. Unconscious of a person is considered wider than just repressed sexual desires or archetypes of the collective unconscious. Moral can also be considered as one of the forces of such an "unconscious". " Where the spiritual self plunges into the realm of the unconscious as its last foundation, there we can, depending on the circumstances, speak of knowledge, love or art. Where, on the contrary, the psychophysical id breaks into consciousness, we are dealing with neurosis and psychosis.", - wrote W. Frankl. The spiritual principle in a person is not only the result of the sublimation of aspirations, it is not a kind of concomitant phenomenon of the body-psychic complex, but initially exists along with it. Soul and body are considered as two complementary ways of manifestation of the living.

Depth psychology, with its appearance, stimulated the development of a new field of medicine that studies the influence of psychological factors on the occurrence of certain diseases. This branch of medicine is called psychosomatics. As a therapeutic method, psychosomatics proceeds from the fact that there is not a single disease of the body that would not be accompanied by mental causes.

Depth psychology refers to:

  • psychoanalysis by Z. Freud;
  • analytical psychology of C. G. Jung;
  • individual psychology of A. Adler;
  • neo-Freudianism of K. Horney, E. Fromm, G. Sullivan and others.

Depth psychology uses methods partially borrowed from psychoanalysis, namely:

  • free associations,
  • projective methods,
  • methods of psychodrama, etc.

Depth psychology opposes itself behaviorism(behavioral psychology), which studies only the observable manifestations of the human psyche.

According to depth psychologists, what we are aware of is only a small part of our personality, like the tip of the iceberg. With the help of depth psychology, you can discover the amazing reserves of your own personality, better understand and know yourself, and solve many long-standing problems.

2. Psychoanalysis 3. Freud

Psychoanalysis 3. Freud(1856-1939) was formed in the conditions and under the influence of the political and social development of Austria at the end of the past - the beginning of this century. Such features of the socio-psychological atmosphere of Austria at that time as the collapse of patriarchal principles in a collision with the bourgeois way of life, the rivalry between the political forces of liberals and conservatives and the defeat of liberalism, the flourishing of nationalism and on its basis the spread of anti-Semitic sentiments, the feeling of which is repeatedly described by Freud 3. ("Interpretation of Dreams", "Autobiography", etc.)



Economic upheavals (crises) gave rise to pessimism, loss of faith in the rationality of being and ideas about the irrationality of life, various forms and varieties of irrational consciousness. At the end of the XIX century. there is a wide interest in the unconscious - not only in special, scientific literature, but also in fiction, as well as in philosophy. The views of Z. Freud, his understanding of man, according to which, under the pressure of the instincts of sexuality and due to the unconsciousness of mental processes, it was recognized that “I” is “not the master in my own house”, objectively reflected the crisis of the bourgeois personality, the typical self-perception of the individual in bourgeois society, in including that part of it with which Freud dealt as a medical practitioner. However, Freud himself presented his historically conditioned theory of man as the only scientific - the natural concept of man.

Psychoanalysis emerged in the early 1990s. 19th century from the medical practice of treating patients with functional mental disorders. 3. Freud, after graduating from the medical faculty of the University of Vienna (1881), worked as a practicing physician in Vienna. In 1938 he was forced to emigrate to England. Died in London in 1939.

Dealing with neuroses, mainly hysteria, 3. Freud studied the experience of the famous French neurologists J. Charcot and I. Bernheim. The latter's use of hypnotic suggestion for therapeutic purposes, the fact of post-hypnotic suggestion made a great impression on Freud and contributed to such an understanding of the etiology of neuroses, their treatment, which formed the core of the future concept. It was set forth in the book An Investigation of Hysteria (1895), written jointly with a well-known Viennese physician I. Breuer(1842-1925), with whom Freud was collaborating at the time.

In its general form, Freud's theory during this period amounted to an understanding of neurotic illnesses as a pathological functioning of "impaired affects", strong, but detained in the unconscious area of ​​​​experiences. If, through hypnosis, the patient is able to relive these traumatic experiences and re-experience them emotionally, healing can occur. The decisive moment in the formation of the original theory 3. Freud was the departure from hypnosis as a means of penetrating the hurt and forgotten painful experiences: in many and just the most difficult cases, hypnosis remained powerless, met with "resistance" that it could not overcome.

Freud was forced to look for other ways to the hurt affect and eventually found them in the interpretation of dreams, free-floating associations of small and large psychopathological symptoms (manifestations), excessively increased or decreased sensitivity, movement disorders, slips of the tongue, forgetfulness, etc. Research and Freud called the interpretation of this diverse material psychoanalysis - a new form of therapy and method of research. The core of psychoanalysis as a new psychological trend is the doctrine of the unconscious.

Freud's scientific activity spanned several decades. Over the years, his concept of the unconscious has undergone significant changes. In his teaching; It is possible to distinguish, albeit somewhat conditionally, three periods. The first period (1897-1905) was when psychoanalysis basically remained a method of treating neuroses, with occasional attempts at general conclusions about the nature of mental life. The main works of this period: The Interpretation of Dreams (1900), The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (1904), Wit and its Relation to the Unconscious (1905), Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905), An Excerpt from an Analysis of Hysteria "(1905, the first and complete exposition of the psychoanalytic method of treatment).

Work is of particular importance "The Interpretation of Dreams", which sets out the first version of the doctrine of the system of mental life as having a deep structure. It distinguishes three levels - conscious, preconscious and unconscious with censorship between them.

During this period, psychoanalysis began to gain popularity, a circle formed around Freud (1902) from representatives of various professions (doctors, writers, artists) who wanted to study psychoanalysis and apply it in their practice.

In the second period (1906-1918), Freudianism turns into general psychological doctrine of personality and its development. Freud formulates the basic principles of his psychology, a description of mental processes from three points of view - dynamic, topical and economic.

During this period, “Analysis of the Phobia of a Five-Year-Old Boy” (1909), “Leonardo da Vinci” (1910) and “Totem and Taboo” (1912) are published - works in which Freud extends psychoanalysis to the field of artistic creativity and the problems of human history, “ Regulations on the two principles of mental activity” (1911).

Psychoanalysis is arousing interest in many countries. In 1909, Freud, at the invitation of Hall, lectured at Clark University (Worchester) and this marked the beginning of the spread of psychoanalysis in America ("On Psychoanalysis, Five Lectures", 1909).

A significant event in the development of psychoanalysis during this period was the departure from Freud of his first collaborators A. Adler (1911) and C. Jung (1912). The best and most complete exposition of psychoanalysis as it developed by the beginning of the First World War, and the work that, together with The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, received the widest distribution compared to other works of 3. Freud, are his Lectures on Introduction to Psychoanalysis ( in 2 volumes; in 1932, Freud added the 3rd volume to them), which are records of lectures given to doctors in 1916-1917. In the 3rd, last, period, the concept of 3. Freud undergoes significant changes and receives its philosophical completion.

Under the influence of the events of the First World War, the the doctrine of instincts(“Beyond the Pleasure Principle”, 1920). The structure of the personality is now presented in the form of a doctrine of three instances - "I", "It", "Ideal-I" ("I and It", 1923). In a number of works 3. Freud extends his theory to the understanding of culture and various aspects of social life: religion - "The Future of an Illusion" (1927), anthropology, social psychology, problems of civilization - "Psychology of the masses and analysis of the human "I" (1921), Moses and Monotheism (1939) and others. Psychoanalysis is becoming philosophical system and merges with other irrationalist currents of bourgeois philosophy.

ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY by C. Jung- one of the areas of depth psychology and psychotherapy, which originally arose within the framework of the psychoanalytic movement, but later acquired the status of an independent existence.

The founder of analytical psychology is the Swiss psychotherapist Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961), who developed the method of associative experiment in the psychiatric clinic Burgholzli led by psychiatrist E. Bleyer (1898–1927) and discovered the presence of sensory complexes in a person, who established correspondence with Z. Freud, and in 1907 paid his first visit to him, shared psychoanalytic ideas for a number of years and was the editor of the Yearbook of Psychoanalytic and Psychopathological Research, as well as president of the International Psychoanalytic Association from March 1910 to April 1914.

After the publication of the work of Z. Freud "The Interpretation of Dreams" (1900), K.G. Jung read it, referred to it in his doctoral dissertation On the Psychology and Pathology of So-Called Occult Phenomena (1902), re-read it in 1903, and beginning in 1904 made extensive use of psychoanalytic ideas in diagnosing associations and the psychology of early dementia (dementia praecox), later called schizophrenia by E. Bleuler. For several years, a fruitful exchange of views on the development of psychoanalytic ideas and concepts was carried out between the two researchers and practitioners, as a result of which, at the second International Psychoanalytic Congress, held in March 1910 in Nuremberg, it was Z. Freud who recommended K.G. Jung as the first president of the International Psychoanalytic Association. Moreover, the founder of psychoanalysis considered C.G. Jung as his ideological heir and placed great hopes on him in terms of the further development of the psychoanalytic movement.

In 1911, between Z. Freud and K.G. Jung found differences in the understanding of some psychoanalytic ideas. The publication of the last work "Libido, Its Metamorphoses and Symbols" (1912), in the second part of which the Freudian concept of libido and ideas about the "incestuous complex" was revised, led to a deepening of theoretical differences between them. Subsequent conceptual and subjective differences led to the fact that at the beginning of 1913 between K.G. Jung and Z. Freud stopped first personal, and a few months later, business correspondence. Later K.G. Jung began to develop his own doctrine of man and his mental illness, the totality of ideas and therapeutic techniques of which was called analytical psychology, which was reflected in his work Preface to Selected Papers on Analytical Psychology (1916).

Unlike classical psychoanalysis, K.G. Jung, the following general theoretical ideas were put forward: a person should be considered on the basis of his health, and not from pathology, which is characteristic of the views of Z. Freud; the doctrine of introverted and extroverted personality types is based on the assumption that in the picture of the world there are internal and external principles, and between them there is a person who is turned to one or the other pole, depending on temperament and inclinations; mental energy is born from the interaction of opposites, it is not limited only and exclusively to sexual energy, and, therefore, the concept of libido is broader in content than is commonly believed in psychoanalysis; in order to break the vicious circle of biological phenomena associated with sexuality, incest, it is necessary to recognize the presence of the spirit and relive it; a person naturally develops a religious function and therefore, for a long time, the human psyche has been permeated with religious feelings; all religions are positive and in the content of their teachings there are those figures that one has to face in the dreams and fantasies of patients; The human ego suffers not only because of its separation from humanity, but also from the loss of spirituality.

As K.G. Jung in Freud and Jung: A Difference of Views (1929), it is on these general assumptions that all the many divergences that take place between classical psychoanalysis and analytical psychology are based. Differences concerning both the “genetic” (instead of purely sexual) understanding of libido and the rejection of the polymorphic-perverse characteristics of the child, taken from the psychology of neuroses and projected back into the psychology of the infant, and the division of the unconscious into individual and collective, the differences between the Self and the Self, as well as opposing the constructive (synthetic) method of research to the causal-reductive (analytical) interpretation of mental processes.

If Z. Freud appealed to the unconscious mental, then K.G. Jung distinguished between the individual (personal) unconscious, containing sensory complexes, and the collective (superpersonal) unconscious, which is a deep part of the psyche, which is not an individual acquisition of a person, and owes its existence to "exclusively inheritance", manifested in the form of archetypes, acting as a "model and a pattern of instinctive behaviour.

If the founder of psychoanalysis singled out It, I and Super-I in the personality structure, then K.G. Jung singled out such components in the human psyche as Shadow, Persona, Anima, Animus, Divine Child, Virgo (Kora), Old Sage (Philemon), Self and a number of other figures.

If in classical psychoanalysis the father complex played a decisive role in the development of the personality, then in analytical psychology it was the mother complex, which absorbed the image of the Great Mother.

If Z. Freud undertook a causal (causal) interpretation of dreams, then, like the founder of individual psychology, the Austrian psychologist and psychotherapist A. Adler (1870–1937), K.G. Jung was guided by the final (goal-setting) way of considering dreams, believing that "everything psychological requires a double way of considering, namely causal and final" (in this respect, analytical psychology was a kind of synthesis of some ideas of classical psychoanalysis and individual psychology).

If Z. Freud believed that the dream has a reducing, biological compensatory function, then K.G. Along with this function, Jung also recognized the prospective function of the dream, which contributes to the emergence in the unconscious of a certain plan, the symbolic content of which is a blueprint for solving intrapsychic conflicts.

If the founder of psychoanalysis emphasized the exceptionally important role of the unconscious in human life, then the founder of analytical psychology proceeded from the fact that “the meaning of the unconscious is approximately equivalent to the meaning of consciousness” and one is an addition to the other, since consciousness and the unconscious are connected with each other by bonds of mutual compensation.

If, in Z. Freud's view, there is nothing accidental in the psyche, and in the internal, as well as in the external world, everything is due to a causal relationship, then in the understanding of K.G. Jung, mental and physical are different aspects of a single reality, where, in addition to the causal connection, the acausal connecting principle or synchronicity is also effective, indicating the parallelism of time and meaning between various events that take place in the life of an individual, other people and in the world as a whole.

If for Z. Freud the center of personality is I (consciousness), and the position “Where It was, I must become” was the psychoanalytic maxim, then for K.G. Jung, the central position in the personality is occupied by the Self, which includes consciousness and the unconscious, uniting, thanks to the “transcendental function” (combining the contents of consciousness with the contents of the unconscious), conscious and unconscious representations into a kind of unity or “mental integrity”, which implies the implementation of individuation, that is, the process , generating a psychological individual, that process, the symbol of which can be a mandala (the image of a circle in a square and a square in a circle or a quarter and a circle, embodying the integrity of the psyche, the completeness and perfection of the personality).

General and particular conceptual differences of K.G. Jung with a number of psychoanalytic ideas put forward by Z. Freud were reflected in analytical practice - in the use of appropriate methods of working with the unconscious of patients, the strategies and goals of analytical psychology in assisting those who turned to the analyst for help.

Based on analytical psychology, psychotherapy includes an attitude towards the individualization of the treatment method and the irrationalization of the target activity. Both are associated with specific types of patients (introverts and extroverts, young and old, with mild and severe mental disorders, adapting to reality with difficulty or without difficulty) and various stages of psychotherapeutic problems - recognition (confession, catharsis, corresponding to the cathartic method of treatment J. Breuer), clarification (an explanation of the phenomena of resistance and transfer, characteristic of the method of interpretation of Z. Freud), education (in many cases, clarification leaves behind “albeit an understandable, but nevertheless unadapted child” and therefore social education is required that reflects the aspirations of A. Adler’s individual psychology) and transformation (self-education of the educator, based on changes not only in the patient, but also in the doctor, who, before becoming a practicing analyst, must himself undergo an educational analysis in order to deal with his own unconscious).

Thus, analytical psychology not only includes the methods of treatment used in classical psychoanalysis and individual psychology, but also represents a healing of the soul, which is put at the service of self-education and self-improvement. The fourth stage of analytical psychology (transformation) expands the horizon of healing and leads to the fact that in psychotherapy "not a doctor's diploma, but human qualities" is essential. Self-education and improvement become integral components of psychotherapy, which focuses on the internal tendencies of the development of the person himself, capable of leading to spiritual integrity in the process of mutual transformation of the patient and the doctor involved in the analysis. Thus, as K.G. Jung, analytical psychology fills a deep gap that previously testified to the spiritual inferiority of Western European cultures compared to Eastern ones, and becomes nothing more than a kind of "yoga of the twentieth century."

Analytical therapeutic practice of K.G. Jung was based on the following approaches, methods and techniques for understanding the unconscious and healing the soul: a constructive (synthetic-hermeneutic) approach to mental processes, in which analysis is not a panacea, but a more or less thorough putting in order in the patient's psyche, involving liberation "from partitions between consciousness and the unconscious” and insight into its potential creative possibilities; dialectical approach, which consists in comparing mutual data, recognizing the fact of the possibility of different interpretations of symbolic contents, understanding that any mental impact is in fact the interaction of two systems of the psyche; the dialectical method of establishing such relationships between the doctor and the patient, in which the individuality of the patient requires respect no less than the individuality of the analyst, and the therapist ceases to be an active party, but becomes simply "an accomplice in the individual development process"; the technique of "amplification" that expands and deepens the images of dreams through historical parallels from the fields of mythology, alchemy, and religion; the method of "active imagination", which is an effective way of bringing the contents of the unconscious to the surface and activating creative fantasy, due to which the transcendental function becomes effective, initiating the process of individuation, giving a person the opportunity to achieve his liberation, contributing to his gaining unity, completeness, integrity and leading to the establishment of an internal harmony.

The main task of the analyst is, according to K.G. Jung, not in delivering the patient from momentary difficulties, but in preparing him to successfully confront possible difficulties in the future. The effect sought by the analyst is the emergence of such a state of mind in which the patient begins to experiment, express himself with a brush, pencil or pen, shape his fantasies into material images of reality, make the transition to mental maturity and creative independence from his complexes and from the doctor. .

Critical rethinking of K.G. Jung a number of psychoanalytic ideas and concepts of Z. Freud predetermined the formation of analytical psychology. The innovations he introduced into the practice of psychotherapy (the method of “active imagination”, the reduction in the frequency of analytical sessions from five to three or two or even once a week, breaks in treatment for two to two and a half months so that the patient was provided with the usual environment and etc.) contributed to its further development. And although analytical psychology has acquired the status of an independent existence, and its modern representatives tend to dissociate themselves from psychoanalysis as such, it is nevertheless obvious that there are not only differences, but also similarities between them. It is no coincidence that in the report “The Goals of Psychotherapy”, published in the report of the Congress of the German Psychotherapeutic Society in 1929, K.G. Jung remarked that he viewed his therapeutic technique as a direct continuation of the development of the Freudian method of free association.

Some modern authors, in particular, the Italian psychoanalysts P. Fonda and E. Yogan, come to the conclusion that "the distance between analysts belonging to Jung's circle and those belonging to Freud's circle has decreased, and their language is similar" . This opinion was expressed by them in the work "The development of psychoanalysis in recent decades" (1998).

Psychoanalysis (depth psychology) is one of the first psychological directions that appeared as a result of the division of psychology into different schools. The subject of psychology in this school was the deep unconscious structures of the psyche, and the method of their study was developed by this school.

The main provisions of psychoanalysis:
1) understanding as motivational, personal;
2) consideration of development as an environment, although later other psychoanalysts did not understand the environment as completely hostile, however, it always opposes the concrete;
3) the driving forces of mental development are always innate and unconscious and represent mental energy given in the form of human drives or aspirations and striving for discharge (i.e. satisfaction);
4) the basic mechanisms of development, which are also innate, lay the foundations for it already in early childhood. Hence the interest of psychoanalysis in the memories of early childhood and the traumas received in this.

Basic theories of depth psychology


Congenital unconscious drives to life and death (eros and thanatos), transforming libidinal, aggressive and suicidal drives. Id, Ego and Superego. Identification with a close adult of the same sex. Repression, regression, rationalization, projection, sublimation.


The desire for rootedness and independence, individualization. A typology based on the dominance of one of the two needs - to be or to have. Sadism, masochism, conformism, destructiveness.

E. Erickson
A personality develops throughout life, passing through 8 main stages of its formation, at each of which the form of psychic energy changes (feeling of guilt, identity, etc.). The leading structure of the ego, striving for a somatic, personal and social identity. The desire for integrity, (with oneself, one's culture, ethnic group, etc.).

mental processes. As a synonym for the concept of "depth psychology" is often used the concept of " dynamic psychology”, although the term “dynamic” denotes only a special case of a deep approach (along with economic and topographical ones), which describes mental phenomena not in a static, but in a dynamic aspect - as a result of a collision and addition of unconscious drives.

From the history

The merit of introducing the concept is recognized by the Swiss psychiatrist E. Bleuler, who worked closely with Z. Freud. Through joint research, the authors laid the foundation for the study of mental phenomena through the prism of the unconscious. Psychoanalysis became the leading direction in depth psychology, from which numerous directions and currents later broke away.

Theories and directions

Depth psychology includes:

  • Neo-Freudianism (K. Horney, E. Fromm, G. Sullivan and others)

"Depth psychology" is a concept that arose in modern medical psychology (E. Bleuler), and denotes that psychological science that deals with the phenomena of the unconscious.

It is interesting

The basis of the term Tiefenpsychologie ("typhopsychology") is borrowed by Ph.D. Yu. R. Vagin to designate his own approach, which he called “typhoanalysis” (“deep analysis”). Typhoanalysis is a monistic psychological concept, the subject of study of which is the field of metapsychology of classical psychoanalysis.

see also

Sources

  • Freud Z. Psychology of the unconscious. Translation from him. A. M. Bokovikova. - M., 2006
  • Laplanche J., Pontalis J.-B. Dictionary of psychoanalysis. M., 1996
  • Rycroft C. Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. - St. Petersburg, 1995
  • Psychoanalytic terms and concepts: Dictionary / Ed. Borness E. Moore and Bernard D. Fine/Translated from English. A. M. Bokovikov, I. B. Grinshpun, A. Filz. - M., 2000

Links

  • Psychoanalysis (deep psychology)//M. G. Yaroshevsky History of psychology
  • Depth psychology - a dictionary of psychoanalytic terms of the site Psychoanalysis in Russia

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010 .

  • Deep Star Number 6
  • Deep-over-Vltava

See what "Depth Psychology" is in other dictionaries:

    DEEP PSYCHOLOGY- (German Tiefenpsychologie), the designation of a number of areas of modern. foreign psychology, who made the subject of their research the so-called. the deepest forces of the personality, its drives and tendencies, which are opposed to the processes taking place on ... ... Philosophical Encyclopedia

    depth psychology- a number of areas of Western psychology that attach decisive importance in the organization of human behavior to irrational motives, tendencies, attitudes hidden behind the "surface" of consciousness, in the "depths" of the individual. The most famous directions of G ... Great Psychological Encyclopedia

    DEEP PSYCHOLOGY- see DEEP PSYCHOLOGY. Antinazi. Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2009 ... Encyclopedia of Sociology

    DEEP PSYCHOLOGY- (German: Tiefenpsychologie) the collective designation of the directions of psychology of the 20th century, which made the subject of research the so-called. the deepest forces of the personality, its drives and tendencies, which are opposed to processes on the surface of consciousness (psychoanalysis Z. ... ... Big Encyclopedic Dictionary

    Depth Psychology- a number of areas in psychology and psychiatry, in which the leading role of the unconscious (irrational, affective-emotional, instinctive and intuitive processes) is postulated in the activity of the individual, in the formation of his personality. Includes:… … Psychological Dictionary

    DEEP PSYCHOLOGY- a collective concept, through which they denote a number of different directions, currents, schools and concepts of psychology, emphasizing the activity and study of various unconscious components, mechanisms and processes, ... ... The latest philosophical dictionary

    DEEP PSYCHOLOGY- (from German tifenpsy chologie letters, depth psychology) a number of areas of modern, primarily foreign psychology, the main subject of study of which is the unconscious as the main factor in organizing human behavior (Freudianism, ... ... Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychology and Pedagogy

    depth psychology- (German: Tiefenpsychologie), a cumulative designation of the directions of psychology of the 20th century, which made the subject of study the so-called deep forces of the personality, its drives and tendencies, which are opposed to processes on the "surface" of consciousness ... ... encyclopedic Dictionary

    DEEP PSYCHOLOGY- (Depth psychology; Tiefenpsychologie) the general name of psychological currents that put forward the idea of ​​​​the independence of the psyche from consciousness and seek to substantiate and explore this independent mentality as such, in its dynamic ... ... Analytical Psychology Dictionary

    depth psychology- (from German tifenpsychologie letters, depth psychology) a number of areas of modern, primarily foreign psychology, the main subject of study of which is the unconscious as the main factor in the organization of human behavior (Freudianism, ... ... Ethnopsychological dictionary

Books

  • Wisdom of the Mind: Depth Psychology in the Age of Neuroscience, Paris Ginette. In this book, Ginette Paris opens up a new genre of psychological writing that connects intimate personal biography, humanly touching patient stories, and radical,…

100 r first order bonus

Choose the type of work Graduation work Term paper Abstract Master's thesis Report on practice Article Report Review Test work Monograph Problem solving Business plan Answers to questions Creative work Essay Drawing Compositions Translation Presentations Typing Other Increasing the uniqueness of the text Candidate's thesis Laboratory work Help on-line

Ask for a price

Depth psychology began its development path with the psychoanalysis of Freud, who developed his own methodology, different from the traditional one, based on identifying the characteristics of human experiences and actions due to unconscious motives. Freud proposed a kind of psychological technique - the method of free associations. The purpose of the method was to return to consciousness repressed ideas and experiences that could be the cause of neurotic disorders or abnormal behavior of the patient. Freud was thoroughly introspective, and much of his theoretical reasoning was based on his own neurotic disorders. He undertook a work of introspection in order to better understand himself and understand his patients. Freud considered the analysis of dreams to be the main means of introspection, and in 1900 summarized his experience in the book The Interpretation of Dreams, which is still considered one of his main works today. In 1901, Freud published the book The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, where he suggested that unconscious ideas, competing with each other for a breakthrough into consciousness, have a significant impact on the thoughts, actions and actions of a person, changing them. In 1902, Freud was approached by a group of students, including Adler and Jung, to direct a weekly seminar on problems in psychoanalysis. This is how the psychoanalytic school of Freud arose, which created the basic theoretical prerequisites for the formation of one of the three dominant areas of modern psychology and psychotherapy - a dynamic direction that combines a large number of theories based on the concept of the unconscious. Freud was the first theorist to point out the importance of the study of childhood for understanding the nature of the human psyche.

In 1911, due to theoretical differences, one of Freud's favorite students, Adler, the founder of individual psychology, left the Freudian Society. In 1914, Freud also left the Swiss psychiatrist Jung, whom he considered his spiritual son and heir to the psychoanalytic school. Jung developed his own analytical psychology.

In addition to Adler's individual psychology and Jung's analytical psychology, Freud's psychoanalysis was the source of a vast current in psychology that arose in the 1930s. 20th century - neopsychoanalysis. Its largest representatives were Horney, who developed characterological analysis, Fromm with his humanistic psychoanalytic theory, Sullivan, who created the interpersonal theory of psychiatry, Erickson, the author of the psychosocial concept. The period of creation of these theories spans decades both before the Second World War and after it. Depth psychology has penetrated not only psychiatry and psychology, but also literature and art, cultural studies, anthropology and sociology.

In Russia, interest in depth psychology was accompanied by clinical testing of Freud's hypotheses; it had both its supporters and opponents. Russian scientists met Freud's ideas about the leading role in the origin of neuroses (F40-F48) of sexual experiences with calm interest.

Criticism of psychoanalysis concerned only the one-sidedness of Freud's views, ignoring other factors in the origin of neuroses, in addition to sexuality. Almost every publication of Freud was reflected in abstract reviews on the pages of the Journal of Neuropathology and Psychiatry. Most of the major works were translated into Russian and published as separate books. The issues of psychoanalysis were given special attention by such Russian doctors and scientists as Osipov, Vyrubov, Asatiani, Wulf, Rosenthal, Luria, Livshits and others.

After the October Revolution of 1917 and the civil war in Soviet Russia, the study of psychoanalysis continued. There were naive attempts to combine psychoanalysis with Marxism, which bore the general name of Freudo-Marxism (Luria, Friedman). After Marxism-Leninism became the only theory in the USSR, Freudianism, like behaviorism and other psychological concepts, were severely criticized and banned as propaganda of bourgeois ideology. In the 1920s, the scientific works of foreign psychologists were actively published in our country: Freud, Adler, Koehler, Koffka, Thorndike, Piaget, Kretschmer, in the introductory articles to which domestic scientists gave a detailed description of their theories and methods. New personal contacts between Soviet psychologists and foreign psychologists continued and were established. Representatives of Soviet psychology actively participated in international congresses and symposiums. Applied psychology developed rapidly, especially psychotechnics and pedology. By 1923, there were 13 scientific institutes in the country engaged in the study of the problem of labor, and a large number of pedological laboratories. Since 1928, the journal "Psychology, Pedology and Psychotechnics" began to appear, where the results of research conducted in our country were published. Psychodiagnostics developed actively. Thus, at the Moscow branch of VIEM, the psychology of mental retardation was studied in the pathopsychological laboratory under the direction of Vygotsky, Birenbaum, and Zeigarnik. Pathopsychological studies were developed at the Psychoneurological Institute under the direction of Bekhterev, and then Myasishchev.