Stradze: The Ministry of Education and Science will conduct an audit of sports facilities in universities. Stradze: The Ministry of Education and Science will audit sports facilities in universities Alexander Eduardovich Stradze appointed

The problem of physical training of Russian schoolchildren and students is increasingly being discussed at the highest level. Officials are looking for ways to get the younger generation to think about health and take up sports. In an interview with RIA Novosti special correspondent Irina Goryunova, Director of the Department of Additional Education, Upbringing and Youth Policy of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Alexander Stradze spoke about the development of student sports in educational institutions and universities.

— Alexander Eduardovich, how many sports infrastructure facilities are available in universities today, and are all of them used for their intended purpose?

- In the universities subordinated to the Ministry of Education and Science, there are only about two thousand indoor sports facilities that meet modern requirements. But basically the material and technical base leaves much to be desired. More than 300 thousand square meters require major repairs and cannot be used for their intended purpose, many universities have to rent gyms. Now universities rent 169 gyms and 231 swimming pools.

Of course, we consider this to be wrong and we want every university to have its own sports facilities. In this regard, a positive example is the 500 Pools project, which we have been implementing together with United Russia since 2010. More than 30 pools have already been built as part of the project. In 2013, it is planned to build swimming pools in 13 higher education institutions subordinate to our ministry, and in four higher education institutions subordinate to the Russian Ministry of Health.

Unfortunately, we have examples when physical culture and sports facilities are not used for their intended purpose, but now we have practically stopped this, at least in subordinate universities. But there is another problem when students do not have the opportunity to use gyms due to unacceptable conditions. Today, 76.3% of the total number of students pay for physical education and sports outside of school hours, the average monthly fee is 1,353 rubles.

In our opinion, the management of universities is obliged to create the most favorable conditions for students to study at sports facilities. Now we are analyzing the situation, and soon we will have a complete picture of how universities use their sports grounds. Based on the results of the analysis, we will take action against the management of universities where sports facilities are used for other purposes. They will be of the most serious nature.

How many students are involved in sports?

- Currently, out of seven million students, only about 25% regularly go in for sports.

In accordance with the strategy for the development of physical culture and sports in Russia until 2020, the number of students involved in sports should increase to 80%. This means that today it is necessary to apply unprecedented support measures in order to reach such an indicator.

With regard to enhanced scholarships for merit in sports, how does the payment scheme work?

- The Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation provides for the allocation of increased scholarships, including for student achievements in sports activities.

Of the allocated funds, which is about nine billion rubles a year, about 20% is directed to encouragement for achievements in university sports. In addition, each university has the right to establish its own scholarship from an off-budget fund, and many do this. We have a lot of examples when the rector, who is interested in the development of sports, finds forms and ways of development. There are also scholarships awarded by regional and municipal authorities, commercial companies and various foundations.

Student sports are gaining popularity and need quality management, infrastructure, fans, brands.

What is the size increased scholarships and who develops the criteria by which they are paid?

- Today, increased scholarships for students' achievements in sports activities are awarded in almost all universities.

For example, in universities subordinate to the Ministry of Education and Science, about 12,000 students receive such scholarships. The size of scholarships in universities is different - from 1.25 thousand to 20 thousand rubles a month. The average amount for all universities is about five thousand rubles a month.

Each university has the right to develop its own procedure for awarding scholarships and detailed criteria. But today we insist that students and student associations take an active part both in the formation of the order and in the distribution of the scholarship fund, and the regulation on the payment and appointment of scholarships should be posted on the university website.

How does the ministry encourage universities to allocate funds for student sports?

We have two big competitions. One is devoted to the organization of physical culture and sports work in an educational institution, and the second is a comprehensive assessment of the conditions for the formation of a healthy lifestyle in a university. But you must admit that getting a diploma for winning a competition is not as interesting as a prize in the form of a new sports facility, equipment or inventory, so we are working on creating new incentives to raise the status of competitions.

We are also thinking about creating a rating that would allow us to evaluate the contribution of the university to the development of university sports. I do not think that the rector will be pleased to know that out of three hundred universities his university is in 298th place. Although the results will begin to be disputed, they will say that the assessments are not objective and were given by the wrong people, but nevertheless we will develop criteria, try to discuss and approve them.

Another incentive is proper PR-support of sports competitions of student teams. We'll take care of that too.

- Russian President Vladimir Putin recently said that he was ready to consider the idea of ​​creating a special fund to finance projects to develop university sports. What are the prospects?

- This is very correct and timely, although the issue remains to be discussed and the mechanism of operation of such a fund has yet to be understood.

- Will the ministry participate in the creation of the Association of Student Sports Clubs, which the head of state also spoke about?

- From an organizational point of view, we are already participating in the creation of the Association, but in no case are we going to interfere in its activities.

How does the ministry evaluate the idea of ​​​​returning to the TRP?

- I would leave the concept familiar to our ears - "TRP standards". Rather, it should be a kind of national standard of physical fitness, different for each age.

If we are talking about people who cannot play sports at full strength, then we need to understand that there are other forms of work with them that will nevertheless allow them to evaluate their physical fitness.

In fact, some standards have already been developed and are being piloted in many regions. The All-Russian Research Institute of Physical Culture, by analogy with the TRP, has developed a complex "Ready for work and defense of the Fatherland." In Moscow, for example, the complex "Moscow athlete" is being implemented. In the Sverdlovsk and Arkhangelsk regions, they went on their own experiment. That is, in every subject of the Russian Federation, where they considered it interesting, there is such a form.

When developing the All-Russian physical fitness standard, we must use a comprehensive individual approach to assessing the physical development of each child, which would fall into the general line of his achievements.

When will this standard come into effect?

- In the near future, we will develop such a standard together with the Ministry of Sports. We will create a working group, discuss it with experts, and, I think, by the summer we will have approximate proposals for its design and content.

We hope that at least as an experiment we will launch the standard from the beginning of the next academic year.

Do you already have an understanding of how the results of the TRP will be taken into account when entering universities?

— This is yet to be discussed, but there is an understanding that, to one degree or another, these results should be taken into account when graduating from an educational institution.

Will the TRP system be designed only for schoolchildren?

- No, in the future it should be extended to all age groups, but I want to emphasize that this system should be voluntary. If we start to force the implementation of some norms, we will get the opposite effect and it is unlikely that we will achieve something positive.

It should be a social movement in which each person will find his own drive, his own logic of participation and achievement of results.

If we talk about schoolchildren, then in the future we can create a kind of "passport" that characterizes their development, and not only physical. That is, a person will have certain data that will later allow him to create a story of his success, in other words, a kind of portfolio, where, in addition to sports success, his achievements in studies, creativity, and social activities will be reflected.

FULL NAME: Stradze Alexander Eduardovich
Date of Birth: September 06, 1966
Place of Birth: Krasnodar city
Education: higher – Kuban State Academy of Physical Culture, Saratov State Socio-Economic University
Family status: married, has two children
Work: Director of the Department of State Policy in the Sphere of Education of Children and Youth of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Motto in life:"Be ready!"

Tell us about your student life.
My student life is unlikely to be a role model for other students, because as a child I played a lot of sports, swimming, and all my time spent as a student was devoted to sports. This means that I trained twice a day: before and after school. And at lectures sometimes he slept, sometimes he behaved in a wrong way and skipped them. Nevertheless, I received my first education at the Kuban State Academy of Physical Culture, and, in principle, I finished it well: without a red diploma, but well, without triples. Still, it seems to me that the student life of a real student should be a little different. On the other hand, I wish the students the same student life as I had: playing sports is also great! Later I received a second higher education - economics. But since I already received it on a paid basis, and I could afford to study easily, it was closely related to my work. Those. then I could no longer call myself a student, but a professional who already worked in a certain sector. All my life I devoted myself to pedagogy, and my education is actually pedagogical.

What projects have been implemented by your Department over the past year, and how effective was it?
Basically, these are projects that actually reflect the activities of the Department. Let's take a few key ones. First, one of the most important projects is the modernization of additional education. This is a project that gives the opportunity and the right to all of us, who have already gathered within the framework of the activities of some university or other educational institution, to remember why we got here, to this university. In our opinion, this system of additional education can radically change the consciousness of people entering a higher educational institution for the sake of a crust, and encourage them to study for the sake of knowledge. The second project is to support the activities of student associations: we financed this project, as a result of which 95 universities received subsidies for the implementation of this project. In 2013, one of its stages ends, and now it is important that we correctly evaluate its results, see how effective it was, and, based on the data received, continue it or close it. Another important project is related to the development of physical culture and the need to form a healthy lifestyle on the basis of educational institutions - this is the issue of developing school and student sports clubs. In general, we have a lot of projects, completely different, and we can talk about them for a very long time.

What is the relationship between the Department and student public organizations?
It is very important for us that we could form an understanding for student organizations of their own importance in the university. Today, the times have passed when these very student organizations were appointed or, at the behest, became the head of the students. Today, it is important for us to organize a natural process of elections and the realization of the student's right to be elected - to become a leader. And it is important that such elections take place in all universities everywhere, so that they affect the entire interested student part, and, most importantly, that as a result of these elections, the university administration will have equal partners. Because in some universities, unfortunately, they think that the main ones are the administration, the rector, etc., but, you know, this is absolutely not the case. The main thing in the university has always been and will be students. Therefore, if we fail to organize their proper management of the university, the development of their own university, then it will be very bad. And the task of the Department is to organize and show this work as very important and a priority.

Do you like what you are doing now?
Very like. In general, I believe that you can not do work that you do not like. To all the people around me, friends, colleagues, I always advise not to do what they do not want. Moreover, work should bring pleasure and satisfaction. It so happened to me that the work is very hard: a lot of trips, business trips, meetings. On the one hand, it is interesting, on the other hand, it is a great return of energy. When there is not enough time for the family, when you do not have time to keep track of how the youngest son grows and changes, this is not great at all and this is not an example to follow. They say that a person who does not leave work on time, distributes his duties incorrectly, performs them incorrectly, such a person is inefficient. And I never leave work on time.

That is, you spend little time with your family?
Catastrophically small. Sometimes I find myself with my family on weekends, and, thank God, there is such a thing as a vacation. But it is extremely rare, maybe once a year, and even then I can’t take a vacation for more than two weeks, it’s just not right. In this, I am a very bad example in the position of director of the department of state policy in the field of education. Unfortunately, I do not deal with the topic of raising a native child.

Do you have time for other hobbies besides your main job?
Interested in sport. I believe that a person should be involved in some kind of active activities. I love to swim, run and play. I love movies, good movies. Even if I have very little time, I devote it to watching good films. At the same time, I do not exchange for films that are in the ranking of the most gigantic box office.

What is your favorite film?
I can't name any specific films. I’d rather say my favorite directors: Emir Kusturica (“Dad on a business trip”, his documentaries, “Maradona” is a masterpiece), Pedro Almodovar (recently I watched his film “Return” with Penelope Cruz for the hundredth time). I also love the work of Andrei Zvyagintsev (The Return), Pavel Lungin (The Island).

How do you see your further personal and career growth?
I see it applied to the activity that I am doing today. If they tell me that I will work as some minister in a topic that I do not understand at all, I will definitely refuse. I see my career growth only in accordance with my activities - this is pedagogy, work with students, teaching. With pleasure, when I mature for this, I would work at a university, perhaps as a leader. For me, this is a very important job. And working for a pastime or a decent pension in the future is not mine. I need to get satisfaction from what I do.

In your opinion, what qualities should a person have in order to achieve success in any field?
I will name four qualities that a person must possess in order to achieve success. I will call them "Qualities of the four" K ", because. they all begin with the letter "K", like the word "quality" itself:

  • firstly, a person must be competent in the business in which he wants to achieve success, he must have a certain level of competence in this topic;
  • secondly, he must be sociable, because if you are at least three times competent, but you cannot communicate with people, find an environment of your own kind, friends in organizing this business, then, unfortunately, nothing will work out for you;
  • the third “K”, which is very important for me, is the ability to work in a team, i.e. a person must understand what a team is for him personally;
  • and the fourth “K” is the control over all the previous three “Ks”, so that you are constantly competent, sociable and able to work in a team.

But it is also very important that each person must have a sense of their place in life. If you understand that you are not occupying someone else's place in life, but your own, you will definitely succeed. If you are uncomfortable, uncomfortable, if you are worried every morning that you are going where you don’t want to go and doing what you don’t want to do, then you need to change your job, you need to change the type of activity, because this is already a bad story.

Your motto for life.
Be ready! When I was a pioneer, they told me: “Be ready!”, And I answered: “Always ready!” And over time, I realized that my motto in life: “Be ready!” Be ready for any changes, for any difficulties, for any meetings, for any, unfortunately, misfortunes - you need to be ready for this. And in order to be ready for anything, you need to be in excellent moral, physical, social condition. This motto, be ready, obliges me to always be in shape.

The main scientific provisions formulated by the author on the basis of the research:
1. Social activity is a mass activity aimed at social changes in society, categorized in sociological thought on three semantic grounds. Firstly, as a form of representation, articulation and realization of social interests. Secondly, as an activity aimed at increasing or consolidating the achieved social and status positions. Thirdly, as an activity associated with the ability to influence ongoing social processes and events for the purpose of social transformation or the conservation of social relations. In the process of development of sociological thought, the understanding of social activity is characterized by a transition to multiparadigmality associated with the interpretation of social activity as a result of social subjectivity under the influence of certain structural and institutional circumstances.

2. The study of social activity of the population is dominated by institutional, structural-functional, structural-activity and conflictological approaches. In the structural-functional model, social activity is associated with the processes of social differentiation and integration, with the inclusion of new socio-professional groups of people in the system of social relations through the occupation of certain social niches. Structural-activity and conflictological approaches proceed from the understanding of the dynamic and flexible nature of activity in the process of internalization as the ability to influence and participate in social changes.

At the same time, in the structural-activity approach, emphasis is placed on the process of internalization (recognition and inclusion of structural norms as immanent in life strategies) while recognizing subjectivity as an opportunity to participate in social transformations. The socio-conflictological paradigm aims at the analysis of social activity in the process of formation, emergence and resolution of social conflicts as the interaction of parties with multidirectional vectors of social activity. Thus, in an integrative sense, social activity is seen as a type of activity aimed at social change through the inclusion of collective subjectivity.

3. In Russian society, social activity is characterized by localization, concentrated either at the level of the active metropolitan “minority” or in groups of “infringed” interests (deceived equity holders), which leads to segmentation of the space of social activity and the need to take into account differences in activity at the social macro level associated with promotion of institutional changes, and at the social micro level, produced by the deterioration of social well-being.

Under these conditions, the main criteria for the study of social activity are the attitude of various social groups to social activity as a way to change circumstances, as well as the preference for a specific form of social activity. At the same time, it should be taken into account that the non-overlapping of activity at the social macro- and micro-levels contributes to the formation of an attitude towards social activity as a mechanism of forced action, which determines the operationalization of the criterion. Thus, the main criterion for the study of social activity in Russian society, which characterizes its common features and special features, is a survey toolkit associated with obtaining empirical and analytical data on the criteria for positioning social activity as a social attitude and a way of forming life strategies, choosing a specific form of social activity. activity, trust in institutionalized forms of social activity and assessment of the prospects for social activity in Russian society.

4. The social structure of Russian society, characterized by excessive social inequalities, produces mistrust at the interpersonal level and a deficit of points of attraction between different social groups. Groups with a high social resource are focused on social activity in the context of defending corporate interests, demonstrating low interest at the macro level, which is expressed in the demand for institutional changes associated with the growing role of the formed new urban strata in socio-political life.

At the same time, for the basic strata of the Russian population, the selected adaptive strategies are aimed at sporadic forms of activity in order to attract the attention of power structures to solve everyday problems. Such a neo-paternalistic orientation leads to the fact that social activity is localized in certain problem areas and, due to the influence of narrow group interests, does not achieve a socially transformative impact, reproducing a situation of social lack of subjectivity, in which no group of the population can claim the role of a "nuclear", driving force. social activity in Russian society.

5. In the institutional dimension, social activity, traditionally directed to the institutions of civil society, in the Russian version is affected by a lack of institutional resources, which is associated, on the one hand, with the delayed effect of the impact of formal legal norms, and on the other hand, with the fact that in Russian society the institutions of order, acting as a guarantor, but not a guide and a catalyst for social activity, have the highest priority. The emerging civil institutions aimed at maintaining activity in the field of human rights protection are not included in the integration into the infrastructure of emerging social associations of interest. The institutionalization of social activity in Russian society includes multidirectional trends: on the one hand, the growth of institutional platforms for positive social activity (volunteer movements), and on the other hand, the formation of a socially destructive minority that has a fairly high degree of negative mobility, occupying marginal positions in the growing “fourth » sector of public life. In this situation, it seems that the development of social activity is connected both with the strengthening of its institutional and legal framework, and with the fact that socially active groups include the dialogue of the state at various macro levels as an institutional strategy.

6. The algorithm of social everyday life, including activity at the social microlevel, creates a mosaic picture of localized areas of social activity, which, although it does not produce a cumulative social effect, form the basis for translating irregular social activity into a state of collective social practices. In the social activity of the Russian population, everyday life is of priority in comparison with macrosystemic problems, and the possibility of including social, sociocultural innovations in the public sphere, the social macrolevel depends on activity at the social microlevel. At the level of everyday life, activity is situational in nature, associated with mass social reactions, which requires the formation of conditions for converting forms of everyday activity into a position of awareness of collective action at the social macro level. In the behavioral strategies of the majority of Russians, social activity takes the place of a situational factor, except for the group of increased hypertrophied social activity (“anti-systemic” opposition), and they can be classified as social-pragmatic and as social-altruistic. Socio-pragmatic practices are based on the satisfaction of vital interests, and are associated, as a rule, with the attenuation of social activity after realizing the expectations or partial satisfaction.

7. Social activity in Russian society is determined by the parallelism of organizational forms and social self-organization. The point is that the development of social activity of the population according to the traditional organizational scheme, although it is outwardly obvious, has limits, firstly, the priority of the state in comparison with public organizations and the logic of adhering to the state, and secondly, in the distrust of Russians in the structures social representation and delegation of interests. Social self-organization formed at the social microlevel creates networks of mutual assistance and mutual support, having the effect of strengthening only in cooperation with authoritative public organizations.

8. Strategies of social activity of the Russian population are formed under the influence of both socially differentiating (status factors) and the specifics of attitudes towards social activity as a way of building life priorities. The social activity of the population is manifested through traditionalist practices focused on the unconditional support of the state as a guarantor of order and stability and carried out at the level of manifestation of political loyalty, which can be characterized as a strategy of active loyalty. The conditional support strategy for social activity is aimed at recognizing social activity as an important factor in social life and social self-realization, contains both obligations to support social activity and expectations from the activities of public organizations to meet group needs and influence strategic decisions on the development of Russian society as an integrator public expectations. The uncertainty strategy fixes the non-inclusion of social activity in the system of life priorities or focuses on social activity as “activity in the future”.

9. Highly educated socially mobile urban strata claim to be the leader of social activity. At the same time, a collective subject of social activity, correlated with the state of civil society, has not been formed. Under these conditions, the Russian state assumes the role of coordinator of social activity, which, on the one hand, increases the level of representation of socially active segments of the population, and on the other hand, contains the risk of separation from the social microlevel, from the level of social everyday life and deepening differences between the actors of everyday action. and social-expert community, claiming a monopoly in the field of social activity.

10. Russian society has not overcome the period of social disintegration, which is associated with the lack of formation of the basic integrating values ​​of social life. Among various social groups and individuals, their own symbolic codes are formed, which causes the effect of distrust and lack of recognition. Despite the fact that the tendency of social altruism, the priority of social utility of social activity, is growing in Russian society, the conflict pluralism of values ​​leads to the fact that this area turns into a field of competition between the value of social activity and instrumental activism based on the situational perception of social activity. Social activity belongs to the semi-core values ​​of Russian society, that is, going beyond the framework of instrumentality, it does not have a value-motivational impact at the social macro level.

11. Identification trends in Russian society show that social activity is being converted into civic identity in the context of building the potential of socially active segments of the population. It should be noted that the state of the identification matrix of social activity is influenced by the priority of social micro-level identities, which limits the identity of "community and solidarity" to the circle of relatives and the formation of Russian civic identity, in which social activity acts as a fixing factor. In the context of increasing public demand for social altruism, associated mainly with the policy of "small deeds", social activity becomes a form of social belonging and self-determination of small groups, which contains a tendency to develop into an integrative identity in the context of the formation of an infrastructure of social activity at the social macro level.

12. Prospects for the development of social activity in Russian society are associated with the process of institutionalization of civic activity, with an increase in the role of the population in the reproduction of political, legal and social relations, on the basis of a framework consensus that establishes and forms a positive attitude towards social activity, as the most relevant option for combining personal and public interests.

The state of social activity in Russian society shows that the localization of social activity is overcome in the context of the implementation of socially mobilizing projects and the formation of an integrating civic identity. The network principle, which plays a certain role in activity at the social microlevel, reproduces distancing from state structures, which, in the conditions of the unconsolidated Russian society, reproduces or deepens social gaps in the system of social relations in Russian society. It is obvious that social activity can be included in the system of social positioning while focusing on modernization trends in Russian society on the basis of social dialogue between political and economic elites and the emerging "creative" class, acting from the position of social altruism and social creativity.

Articles in journals refereed by the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation

1. Stradze A.E. Sociological thought on social activity: analytical potential // Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2010. No. 7. Special issue. 0.5 p.l.

2. Stradze A.E. Sociological approaches to the study of social activity// Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2010. No. 11. 0.5 s.l.

3. Stradze A.E. Social activity of Russians: the micro-level effect // Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2012. No. 11. 0.5 s.l.

4. Stradze A.E. Social activity and identification trends in Russian society // Bulletin of KIGI RAS. 2013. No. 3. 0.5 s.l.

5. Stradze A.E. Russian society: prospects for social activity of the population // Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2013. No. 7. 0.5 s.l.

6. Stradze A.E. Social changes in Russian society in the context of the social activity of Russians // Historical and socio-educational thought. 2013. No. 3. 0.5 s.l.

7. Stradze A.E. Social activity in Russian society: axiological aspect // Historical and socio-educational thought. 2013. No. 4. 0.5 s.l.

8. Stradze A.E. Adaptive strategies of the Russian population and social activity // Bulletin of the Higher School "Alma Mater". 2013. No. 7. 0.5 s.l.

9. Stradze A.E. Social activity, the limits of self-organization and organization // Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series "Regional studies: philosophy, history, sociology, jurisprudence, political science, cultural studies". 2013. No. 2. 0.5 s.l.

10. Stradze A.E. Social activity: positioning in the social space // Theory and practice of social development. 2013. No. 5. 0.5 s.l.

11. Stradze A.E. Social activity in Russian society: the specifics of manifestation and identification criteria // Humanitarian, socio-economic and social sciences. 2013. No. 4. 0.5 s.l.

12. Stradze A.E. Institutionalization of social activity: theoretical and applied problems // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. 2013. No. 3. 0.5 s.l.

13. Stradze A.E. Integration of sociological approaches to the study of youth policy / A.E. Stradze // Social and humanitarian knowledge. 2008. No. 10. 0.5 s.l.

14. Stradze A.E. Dynamics of youth policy in modern Russia in the context of political rhetoric // A.E. Stradze // Bulletin of the Saratov State Technical University. 2008. No. 2. 0.5 s.l.

Monographs

16. Stradze A.E. Essence and problems of youth socialization in modern conditions / A.E. Stradze. Saratov: Privolzhskoe book publishing house, 2006. 6.2 pp.

17. Stradze A.E. Structural and activity dimension of social activity in Russian society. Rostov n/a: SKNTS VS SFedU, 2013. 8 pp.

19. Stradze A.E. Social activity as a factor of social changes in Russian society. Rostov n / a, 2013. 1 p.

20. Stradze A.E. Prospects for social activity in Russian society. Rostov n / a, 2013. 1 p.

Articles in collections

21. Stradze A.E. New generation / A.E. Stradze // Youth of Russia and Challenges of the 21st Century: Proceedings of the Intern. conf. M.: Publishing House of the Academy of Labor and Social Relations, 2003. 0.4 pp.

22. Stradze A.E. Project culture of youth / A.E. Stradze // Socialization of youth as a resource for regional development: materials of the interregional. conf. Orenburg, 2003. 0.8 p.

23. Stradze A.E. Schoolboy - student - young specialist / A.E. Stradze // Preservation and development of the scientific potential of the Volga Federal District: materials of the interregional. conf. Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing house of UNN, 2003. 0.1 pp.

24. Stradze A.E. New generation: new values, new orientations, new goals / A.E. Stradze // Spiritual world of a young man and the future of Russia: materials of the region. interuniversity scientific-practical. conf. Arzamas: Publishing house of AGPI, 2004. 0.5 pp.

25. Stradze A.E. Analysis of problems and prospects for the development of physical culture and sports in the Volga Federal District / A.E. Stradze // Materials of the meeting of the Coordinating Council for Physical Culture and Sports under the Plenipotentiary Representative of the President of Russia in the Volga Federal District. Yoshkar-Ola, 2005. 1.0 pp.

26. Stradze A.E. State youth policy: prospects and risks / A.E. Stradze // Volunteerism: values, organization, technologies: Sat. scientific works. Saratov: Publishing House of PAGS, 2008. 0.4 pp.