Kindness is the desire to help people, and without demanding gratitude for it.
This property of the soul, which allows not to remain indifferent to the troubles of others,
to be around when it is so necessary for a person.
Kindness and sympathy are the basis of the character of Russians, who are always striving to help not only their neighbor,
but also to a total stranger.
Kindness is also a gentle, caring attitude towards people, all life on earth.
The kindness of a child is manifested in his caress for a cat or puppy,
in his care of flowers, kindness must be taught from childhood.

Kindness is a somewhat abstract concept.
Much can be invested in the meaning of this word.
At first glance, it is easy to answer the question: what does kindness mean.
But at the same time it is difficult. After all, kindness is the basis of such concepts as mercy, empathy, sympathy, selflessness and even heroism.
It is love for a person, kindness, the desire to save him that becomes the motivation for a heroic deed.

And what gives kindness to a person?
Of course, respect and love of loved ones, good relations with friends and colleagues.
But kindness is often shown so disinterestedly that the person who has committed a good deed even remains unknown. For him, the main thing is to help others.
An unknown person transferred a large amount of money for the treatment of a child in need.

Do good, and it will definitely return to you, even from the side of sometimes completely strangers to you!

Composition-reasoning on the thematic direction Kindness and cruelty
Cruelty is a rude, aggressive attitude towards living beings,
I don't feel any pity.
It can be expressed in words or in the use of force.
Cruelty can arise due to stress or some kind of mental trauma.
A young child may experience cruelty because someone in the family is cruel,
and it just copies the behavior.
Most often occurs in families where there are constant quarrels and assault.
The child looking at this either takes the side of the offender and behaves in the same way, or takes the side of the victim and becomes angry towards everyone because of suffering. And in a teenager, cruelty can arise either due to the fact that no one notices him either at home, at school, or with friends.

Cruelty is probably the result of the incorrect formation of the human personality, when, during upbringing in childhood, parents do not see a person in a child, do not evaluate him as a person.
Cruelty is generated either by dislike or indifference to the child, or vice versa by boundless blind love, which gives rise to permissiveness.
School or a bad group of friends, the Internet, all this breeds cruelty in a child, which grows and gets stronger over the years. From childhood, it is necessary to instill in the child respect for him as a person, to instill respect for the child for himself and for the people around him, to be able to evaluate his actions and the ability to be responsible for them.
But often this is not the case in many families when raising children.
And cruelty begins to manifest itself from small things, when children begin torturing animals, offending children weaker than themselves, not respecting the elderly, all this then grows into a tougher framework.

In simple words, cruelty can be called a rude and disgusting attitude towards others.
Where does it come from?
Many believe that such a character trait in a person is born due to a lack of love,
respect and attention from others.
However, there are cases when a person becomes cruel far from because of this.
Violent people feel no pity for those who are hurt.
The cause of cruelty can be both childhood psychological trauma,
and disappointment in someone or something.
It is not for nothing that there is such a science as psychology, which just encourages scientists and doctors to study the causes of such character traits.

Composition-reasoning on the thematic direction Kindness and cruelty
Kindness is a quality that should be familiar to every person,
every inhabitant of our planet should have it.
A kind person is always ready to help all those in need and give the last piece of bread,
without asking for anything in return.
Kindness must be selfless if a person does good for the sake of getting something in return,
then such a person cannot be called truly kind.
Kindness is something without which we cannot exist, and it is difficult to disagree with such a statement.
People donate blood to help others, do charity work and do everything to make other people feel good. Can good people be called altruists? – perhaps yes!
Many kind people can be called altruists, because such people do good without demanding anything in return.
Some people not only sometimes help others whenever possible, but also create entire charitable organizations in order to help a huge number of people.

People at all times considered kindness one of the most important human qualities, we observe the victory of goodness in folk tales, stories and other literary works of various genres. People like it when they see the victory of good over evil in books, so the authors of various works most often end their works with just this very victory.

Today, people with real kindness are becoming less and less.
Indifference and selfishness take their toll, depriving humanity of one of the most valuable qualities.
Many people calmly walk past other people's problems, pretending not to notice anything. Everyone has their own affairs - endless worries, work, people stop appreciating priceless qualities and gradually become robots.
I hope that someday humanity will again prefer real, live communication, will appreciate true friendship and will be not indifferent to people who need help. Now computers have made people more callous and less "alive", kindness has become not as important a quality as it used to be.

When we give up our seat on public transport or help elderly people cross the road, we are doing good, but, unfortunately, few people now think that such actions should be more correctly attributed to our duties, and not to the act of kindness as such.
Kindness is something more, accessible to everyone and, at the same time, characteristic of a few.

The theme of the relationship between man and the community of people is one of the most relevant, both in classical Russian literature and in the modern world. Society is a part of the world that lives, develops, has certain time frames, values ​​and traditions. And the unit of society is none other than man. He cannot choose to unite people specifically for himself: he becomes part of society from birth. It is he who subsequently forms the personality, its interests and way of thinking. But is a person capable of turning the lives of those around him? Can it develop outside its structure? How does social pressure affect individuals? In this selection, we have collected arguments from the literature for the final essay in the direction "Man and Society", which can help answer these questions.

1. In his epic novel "War and Peace" Leo Tolstoy reveals the duality of the nature of Russian high society in the early 19th century. On the one hand, the reader observes the life of the high society of St. Petersburg and sees the whole world, with its own laws and moral principles, oriented towards Europe. However, in all high relationships, Tolstoy emphasizes one striking detail - unnaturalness. Luscious strained smiles, ladies in the most beautiful dresses, but cold and deathly pale, as if made of marble, and behind all this imaginary splendor, emptiness and indifference are hidden. The discussion of foreign news at high-society receptions quickly bored a thinking person, and he soon became disillusioned with the outward splendor of pompous gentlemen. On the other hand, Tolstoy paints portraits of such noble and sensitive representatives of the upper class as Pierre Bezukhov, Andrei Bolkonsky, Natasha Rostova and others. A lively mind glimmers in them, there is an interest in the world and people, they are opposed to the dead from St. Petersburg salons. However, they all felt like strangers in high society, and were even deceived and disgraced by it more than once. Their individuality, which favorably differed from the dullness and hypocrisy of society, was able to form only at a distance from it, thanks to exceptional families or education abroad.
2. M. Gorky sang his romantic ideal in the work "Old Woman Izergil". He was embodied in the beautiful young man Danko, to whom the author contrasted the image of the young man Larra. Larra, the son of an eagle and a woman, incapable of true love, pity, self-sacrifice. Life, a great value kept by a person, becomes a living hell for him. He is not able to understand its fragility and transience. Selfish Larra can only receive, but not give in return. And Gorky emphasizes that Larra will never find freedom, since true freedom must be shared with other people in order to establish harmony. Danko, on the contrary, spares nothing for society. He is open to the world and, without hesitation, sacrifices his life to save his native tribe. He obviously does not expect gratitude, because his entire existence is aimed at the human good. Gorky saw the meaning of life in serving society.
3. M.A. Bulgakov in the novel "Master and Margarita" sharply raises the question of the relationship between society and an individual person. His hero is a true genius who wrote an amazing novel. However, after the publication, the Master does not gain popular love, but, on the contrary, is subjected to persecution in the press. And from whom does he get these infuriated reviews and pamphlets? From a society of miserable graphomaniacs from MASSOLIT, pseudo-writers and envious people. The author presents a group of “artists” as caustic and insidious, knowing himself firsthand about him. And in the end, this very society, with endless attacks and harassment, forces the Master to destroy his beautiful creation and brings him to a madhouse. He is no longer a part of this nasty gathering, and his beloved Margarita becomes his entire society, and his soul finds eternal peace.
4. Any society must develop. In comedy A.S. Griboyedov's "Woe from Wit" demonstrates the ossified Famus society - a gathering of noble people, miserable and ignorant. Famusov's guests, like exaggerated Westerners, go dumb with delight when Frenchmen from Bordeaux, Parisian milliners and rootless foreign crooks call in. Chatsky is opposed to them, denouncing their pernicious worship of the Western world and rejection of their own path. He is bright, hot, eager to learn something new, impatient and passionate. It is he who stands up for freedom, art, mind and brings a new high morality to the Famusov world, however, the prim world of Famusov does not accept change and cuts any rudiments of the new, bright and beautiful in the bud. Such is the age-old conflict between the progressive individual and the crowd, which gravitates towards conservatism.
5. The main character of the novel, M.Yu., is also filled with a rebellious spirit. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time". Pechorin does not accept many established social rules, but still tries to find a common language with the world around him. His personality, like the personalities of many others, is formed under the action of several forces: the first is his will, the second is the society and the era in which he exists. Internal torment makes Pechorin seek harmony among other people. He rips off their masks, gives them inner freedom, but invariably each of them fails. That is why the hero remains alone every time, immersed in deep introspection and the search for his own "I". In such a society, he simply cannot find himself and realize his inner potential.
6. In the novel by M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin's "Lord Golovlev" on the example of one prosperous family shows the life of the nobility. The Golovlev family, as a direct cell of high society, reflects all of its most monstrous vices: greed, idleness, ignorance, laziness, hypocrisy, stupidity, inability to work. Arina Petrovna Golovleva managed the estate all her life, thoughtlessly accumulated wealth, and at the same time morally and morally corrupted her offspring. She constantly used the word “family” in her speech, but when she saw how all the property she had acquired was snatched up by her insidious children, Arina Petrovna realized that she lived for the sake of a ghost, and there had never been a real family in her life. So the "higher" society, greedy, helpless and lazy, will certainly find its death in its own sins, as history has shown.
7. The world of A. And Solzhenitsyn's story "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" is bleak, stingy with colors, hopeless. Here people no longer have names, the main determinant is the camp number. Human life has lost its value, and the habits of the inhabitants of the camp are more like animals: all they think about is satisfying their biological needs in order not to die. Among them, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov himself should have gone berserk long ago, lost his human qualities. However, despite all the difficulties of fate, he rejoices at every day he lives on Earth. His small fortunes turn into big ones on the scale of the enclosed space of the camp. Prisoner number eight hundred and fifty-four did not sour or squint. He is still capable of sympathy and pity for his neighbor. In contrast to Ivan Denisovich, camp guards were placed, who ensured a wonderful life for themselves by turning prisoners into slaves. They put themselves above the inhabitants of the camp, thereby violating human laws, excluding themselves from human society.
8. Contrasts the hero with society and A.P. Chekhov in the story "Ionych". At the beginning of the work, Dmitry Ionych Startsev appears before us, a zemstvo doctor, who is opposed to the heroes of the city of S., gray and ignorant people. This is especially evident in the example of the Turkin family, whom Startsev visits. The whole family strives to show off their imaginary "talents", which actually do not exist, and each of them revels in their stupidity. Turkins are static, there is no development in their images. But Startsev is not trying to change anything, but on the contrary, he slowly begins to adapt to the world around him. Under the influence of external forces, he also degrades, sinks to the moral bottom, is carried away by hoarding, grows fat, becomes stupid, ceases to be interested in anything. And at the end we see simply Ionych, a man without a name and without a core, reshaped to fit the low standards of the society of the city of S.
9. In the novel by M.A. Sholokhov's Quiet Flows the Don, the protagonist goes a long way in search of his place in the troubled society of revolutionary times. Grigory Melekhov rushes about, trying to figure out which camp he should join and whom to support in a brutal fratricidal war. "Mad World" frightens the hero, internal torments torment him. In addition to this, there are also love ups and downs. His feelings for Aksinya, forbidden, but deep, push Melekhov to serious actions - he leaves his family, goes against generally accepted norms, in order to finally solve all the troubles and storms of the soul. He, tired of constant thoughts and discord, wants peace and tranquility. That is why, returning home, Melekhov throws the gun into the water. However, a short-sighted society does not accept his search, sticks the yoke of a "traitor" and persecutes an already unarmed and broken person, not knowing compassion.
10. F. M. Dostoevsky in his novel "Crime and Punishment" shows what the decline of society is pushing ordinary citizens to. There are several reasons why Rodion Raskolnikov decided to kill the old pawnbroker. One of them, of course, has roots in the personality of Rodion. But society, mired in poverty and sins, also played a significant role in the student's decision. Raskolnikov himself was choked by lousy poverty, and he, susceptible to other people's suffering, went to a terrible crime. Nothing else makes sense in a society where money, simple pieces of paper have become the main value, and everyone has long forgotten about high morality. A simple girl Sonya Marmeladova takes the path of a prostitute in order to earn money for her family. And her father, without thinking about his relatives, drinks everything in taverns that stink of rotten human souls, while weighty moneybags revel in their wealth earned on the lives of ordinary people. So the author shows that it is impossible to live in society and be free from it: its problems automatically become yours.

Interesting? Save it on your wall!

How do teenagers understand the laws by which modern society lives?

Text: Anna Chainikova, teacher of Russian and literature at school No. 171
Photo: proza.ru

As early as next week, graduates will test their skills in analyzing literary works. Will they be able to open the topic? Choose the right arguments? Will they meet the evaluation criteria? We'll find out very soon. In the meantime, we offer you an analysis of the fifth thematic area - "Man and Society". You still have time to take advantage of our advice.

FIPI comment:

For the topics of this direction, the view of a person as a representative of society is relevant. Society largely shapes the personality, but the personality is also able to influence the society. Topics will allow us to consider the problem of the individual and society from different angles: from the point of view of their harmonious interaction, complex confrontation or irreconcilable conflict. It is equally important to think about the conditions under which a person must obey social laws, and society must take into account the interests of each person. Literature has always shown interest in the problem of the relationship between man and society, the creative or destructive consequences of this interaction for the individual and for human civilization.

vocabulary work

Explanatory Dictionary of T. F. Efremova:
MAN - 1. A living being, unlike an animal, possessing the gift of speech, thought and the ability to produce tools and use them. 2. The carrier of any qualities, properties (usually with a definition); personality.
SOCIETY - 1. A set of people united by historically determined social forms of joint life and activity. 2. A circle of people united by a common position, origin, interests. 3. The circle of people with whom someone is in close contact; Wednesday.

Synonyms
Human: personality, individual.
Society: society, environment, environment.

Man and society are closely interconnected and cannot exist without each other. Man is a social being, he was created for society and from early childhood is in it. It is society that develops, shapes a person, and in many respects it depends on the environment and the environment what a person will become. If, for various reasons (conscious choice, chance, exile and isolation used as punishment), a person finds himself outside of society, he loses a part of himself, feels lost, experiences loneliness, and often degenerates.

The problem of interaction between the individual and society worried many writers and poets. What might these relationships be? What are they based on?

Relations can be harmonious when a person and society are in unity, they can be built on confrontation, the struggle of the individual and society, and maybe on an open irreconcilable conflict.

Often, heroes challenge society, oppose themselves to the world. In literature, this is especially common in the works of the Romantic era.

in the story "Old Woman Izergil" Maxim Gorky, telling the story of Larra, invites the reader to think about the question of whether a person can exist outside of society. The son of a proud free eagle and an earthly woman, Larra despises the laws of society and the people who invented them. The young man considers himself exceptional, does not recognize authorities and does not see the need for people: “... he, boldly looking at them, answered that there were no others like him; and if everyone honors them, he does not want to do this". Ignoring the laws of the tribe in which he found himself, Larra continues to live as he lived before, but the refusal to obey the norms of society entails exile. The elders of the tribe say to the impudent youth: “He has no place among us! Let him go where he wants”, - but this only causes the son of a proud eagle to laugh, because he is used to freedom and does not consider loneliness a punishment. But can freedom become burdensome? Yes, turning into loneliness, it will become a punishment, says Maxim Gorky. Coming up with a punishment for killing a girl, choosing from the most severe and cruel, the tribe cannot choose one that satisfies everyone. “There is a punishment. This is a terrible punishment; you won't invent something like that in a thousand years! His punishment is in himself! Let him go, let him be free", says the sage. The name Larra is symbolic: "rejected, thrown out".

Why, then, what at first aroused the laughter of Larra, “remaining free, like his father,” turned into suffering and turned out to be a real punishment? Man is a social being, therefore he cannot live outside society, Gorky claims, and Larra, although he was the son of an eagle, was still half a man. “There was so much longing in his eyes that one could poison all the people of the world with it. So, from that time on, he was left alone, free, waiting for death. And now he walks, walks everywhere ... You see, he has already become like a shadow and will be like that forever! He understands neither the speech of people, nor their actions - nothing. And he is looking for everything, walking, walking ... He has no life, and death does not smile at him. And there is no place for him among people ... That's how a man was struck for pride! Cut off from society, Larra seeks death, but does not find it. Saying “punishment to him is in himself,” the sages who comprehended the social nature of man predicted a proud young man who challenged society, a painful test of loneliness and isolation. The way Larra suffers only confirms the idea that a person cannot exist outside of society.

The hero of another legend, told by the old woman Izergil, becomes Danko, the absolute opposite of Larra. Danko does not oppose himself to society, but merges with it. At the cost of his own life, he saves desperate people, leads them out of the impenetrable forest, lighting the way with his burning heart torn from his chest. Danko accomplishes a feat not because he is waiting for gratitude and praise, but because he loves people. His act is selfless and altruistic. He exists for the sake of people and their good, and even in those moments when people who followed him shower him with reproaches and indignation boils in his heart, Danko does not turn away from them: “He loved people and thought that maybe without him they would die”. "What will I do for people?!"- the hero exclaims, tearing a flaming heart out of his chest.
Danko is an example of nobility and great love for people. It is this romantic hero who becomes Gorky's ideal. A person, according to the writer, should live with people and for the sake of people, not withdraw into himself, not be a selfish individualist, and he can only be happy in society.

Aphorisms and sayings of famous people

• All roads lead to people. (A. de Saint-Exupery)
• Man is made for society. He is unable and does not have the courage to live alone. (W. Blackstone)
• Nature creates man, but society develops and shapes him. (V. G. Belinsky)
• Society is a set of stones that would collapse if one did not support the other. (Seneca)
• Anyone who loves loneliness is either a wild beast or the Lord God. (F. Bacon)
• Man is created to live in society; separate him from him, isolate him - his thoughts will become confused, his character will become hardened, hundreds of absurd passions will arise in his soul, extravagant ideas will sprout in his brain like wild thorns in a wasteland. (D. Diderot)
• Society is like air: it is necessary for breathing, but not enough for life. (D. Santayana)
• There is no more bitter and humiliating dependence than dependence on the will of man, on the arbitrariness of one's equals. (N. A. Berdyaev)
• Don't rely on public opinion. This is not a lighthouse, but wandering lights. (A. Morua)
• It is common for every generation to consider itself called to remake the world. (A. Camus)

What are the questions to think about?

• What is the conflict between the individual and society?
• Can the individual win in the fight against society?
• Can a person change society?
• Can a person exist outside of society?
• Can a person remain civilized outside of society?
• What happens to a person cut off from society?
• Can a person become an individual apart from society?
• Why is it important to maintain individuality?
• Should I express my opinion if it differs from the opinion of the majority?
• What is more important: personal interests or public interests?
• Is it possible to live in society and be free from it?
• What leads to the violation of social norms?
• What kind of person can be called dangerous to society?
• Is a person responsible to society for his actions?
• To what does society's indifference to man lead?
• How does society treat people who are very different from it?

FIPI commentary on the direction "Man and Society" :
"For the topics of this direction, the view of a person as a representative of society is relevant. Society largely forms a person, but a person can also influence society. The topics will allow us to consider the problem of the individual and society from different angles: from the point of view of their harmonious interaction, complex confrontation or irreconcilable conflict.It is equally important to think about the conditions under which a person must obey social laws, and society must take into account the interests of each person.Literature has always shown interest in the problem of the relationship between man and society, the creative or destructive consequences of this interaction for the individual and for human civilization. "

Recommendations for students:
The table contains works that reflect any concept related to the direction "Man and Society". You DO NOT NEED to read all of the titles listed. You may have already read a lot. Your task is to revise your reading knowledge and, if there is a lack of arguments in one direction or another, fill in the gaps. In this case, you will need this information. Take it as a guide in the vast world of literary works. Please note: the table shows only a part of the works in which the problems we need are present. This does not mean at all that you cannot bring completely different arguments in your works. For convenience, each work is accompanied by small explanations (the third column of the table), which will help you navigate exactly how, through which characters, you will need to rely on literary material (the second mandatory criterion when evaluating a final essay)

An approximate list of literary works and carriers of problems in the direction of "Man and Society"

Direction	Approximate list of literary works	Carriers of the problem
Man and society	A. S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit"	Chatsky challenges the Famus society
	A. S. Pushkin "Eugene Onegin"	Eugene Onegin, Tatyana Larina- representatives of a secular society - become hostages of the laws of this society.
	M. Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time"	Pechorin- a reflection of all the vices of the younger generation of his time.
	I. A. Goncharov "Oblomov"	Oblomov, Stolz- representatives of two types generated by society. Oblomov is a product of a passing era, Stolz is a new type.
	A. N. Ostrovsky. "Thunderstorm"	Katerina- a ray of light in the "dark kingdom" of Kabanikh and Wild.
	A. P. Chekhov. "The Man in the Case".	Teacher Belikov with his attitude to life, he poisons the life of everyone around him, and his death is considered by society as getting rid of something difficult
	A. I. Kuprin "Olesya"	The love of a "natural man" ( Olesya) and human civilization Ivan Timofeevich could not stand the test of public opinion and social structure.
	V. Bykov "Raid"	Fedor Rovba- a victim of a society living in a difficult period of collectivization and repression.
	A. Solzhenitsyn "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich"	Ivan Denisovich Shukhov- a victim of Stalin's repressions.
	R. Brdbury. "A Sound of Thunder"	The responsibility of each person for the fate of the whole society.
	M. Karim "Pardon"	Lubomir Zuh- a victim of war and martial law.

"Man and Society" is one of the topics of the final essay on literature for 2019 graduates. From what positions can these two concepts be considered in the work?

For example, you can write about the individual and society, about their interaction, both about agreement and about opposition. Sample ideas that may come up in this case are varied. This is a person as a part of society, the impossibility of his existence outside society, and the influence of society on something related to a person: his opinion, tastes, life position. You can also consider the confrontation or conflict of a single individual and society, in which case it would be useful to give examples from life, history or literature in the essay. This will not only make the work less boring, but will also give you a chance to increase your score.

Another option for writing about in an essay is the ability or, conversely, the inability to devote one's life to public interests, philanthropy and its opposite - misanthropy. Or, perhaps, in your work you want to consider in detail the issue of social norms and laws, morality, the mutual responsibility of society to a person and a person to society for everything past and future. An essay dedicated to a person and society in the state or historical plan, the role of the individual (concrete or abstract) in history will also be interesting.

Man in a totalitarian state. This topic began to appear in the literature already in the 1920s-1930s, when it became clear that the policy of V.I. Lenin, I.V. Stalin led to the establishment of a far from democratic regime. Of course, these works could not be printed at that time. Readers saw them only in the 1980s, during the period of perestroika and glasnost. Many of these works have become a real discovery. One of them was E. Zamyatin's novel "We", written in 1921. The dystopia depicted by the writer showed what totalitarianism, the silence of people, blind obedience to the regime could lead to. The novel is like a warning that everything depicted in it can happen if society does not resist the terrible system of repression, persecution, when any desire of a person to achieve the truth is literally strangled. The inaction of society in a totalitarian state can lead to the fact that everyone becomes part of a huge state machine, turning into a "faceless WE", losing individuality and even their name, receiving only a number among a huge crowd of people (D-503, 90, I-330) . "... natural wayfrom insignificance to greatness: forget that you- a gram and feel like a millionth of a ton ... ". The value of a particular individual in such a society is lost. It would seem that people built it to be happy. But did it happen? Can life be called happiness by the clock in this United State, feeling like just a cog in a huge mechanism of the state machine (“Ideal is where nothing happens anymore…”)? No, not everyone agrees with such a regimented life when others think for them. They want to feel complete joy, happiness, love, suffering - in general, to be a person, not a number. Behind the walls of the state is real life, which attracts the heroine so much - I-330.

The benefactor decides everything, it is according to his laws that numbers live. And if someone opposes, then there are ways to make people either submit or die. There is no other way out. The author showed that some of the workers could not capture the spacecraft, involving one of the builders of the "Integral" D-503 (it was he who tried to charm I-330 for this purpose). Too strong is the Benefactor and his system. Dies in the Gas Bell I-330, unnecessary memory is erased from the number D-503, which continues to be confident in the justice of the state system (“ I am sure that we will win, because the mind must win!”) Everything in the state continues to go on as usual. How terrible the formula of happiness stated by the Benefactor sounds: “ True algebraic love for a person is certainly inhuman, and an indispensable sign of truth is its cruelty. But it is precisely in the victory of reason that the author believes, when society wakes up, understands that life cannot be like this, so that everyone would say to themselves: “ I ceased to be a term, as always, and became a unit. A person must be part of society, while continuing to be an individual. “WE”, consisting of many “I”, is one of the formulas of happiness, which readers of the novel come to realize.