Identify the sentence in which NOT with the word is spelled CONTINUOUSLY. Open the brackets and write out this word.
It was an (un)known artist.
Often (not) strong enough to defend his convictions.
I had to endure an (in)describable horror.
He (not) had no conscience, no kindness, no honesty.
No one could call him an evil person.
Explanation (see also Rule below).
Here is the correct spelling:
It was an unknown artist. (Turnover to no one)
Often there is a lack of determination to defend their convictions. ( prefix NEDO)
I had to endure an indescribable horror. (communion and head word)
He had no conscience, no kindness, no honesty.
No one could call him an evil person.
There are no errors in the assignment.
Answer: NOT ENOUGH.
Answer: missing
Relevance: Used since 2015
Difficulty: normal
Codifier section: Continuous and separate spelling NOT with different parts of speech. Spelling NOT and NOR.
Rule: Task 13. Continuous and separate spelling NOT and NOR with different parts of speech
Spelling NOT and NOR.
According to the specification, the task of this type checks:
− the ability to distinguish a particle NOT from a particle NI;
- the ability to distinguish the prefix NOT from the prefix NI;
- the ability to write together or separately NOT with all parts of speech.
In this regard, we draw attention to the fact that the condition of tasks, depending on its goals, can vary significantly. At the same time, we also note that in the standard tasks of the USE (authors Tsybulko I.P., Lvov, Egoraeva) only the ability to write together or separately is checked NOT with different parts of speech, but in the tasks of other authors, including Senina, MMIO (StatGrad) there are also tasks to choose from NOT or NOR. The editors of RESHUEGE also consider it necessary to expand the types of this task within the specification of the current year.
We also draw attention to the fact that a number of rules by which spelling is checked are not studied in the school course. Such rules are marked with *.
12.1 Merged and separate spelling of particles NE and NI.
The particle is not written separately:
| 1) If there is or is implied opposition with names, adverbs and participles. It is necessary to distinguish between direct opposition, in which one of the two features called adjectives is denied, and the second is affirmed, and opposition with a concessive shade of meaning, in which both features, called adjectives, are attributed to the object, i.e. there is a contrast, but without negation . Wed: The lake is not deep, but shallow (the sign "deep" is denied and the sign "shallow" is affirmed). - The lake is shallow, but wide (both signs are affirmed: "both shallow and wide"; "although shallow, but wide") . | 1) This is not happiness, but grief. The river is not shallow (deep). You are not my friend. They didn't go fast, but slowly. Not a silent, but a growing rumble. |
| 2) * With adjectives, adverbs in -o and participles, words in -my, if the opposition is implied and the negation is reinforced by the words:
a) not at all, not at all, not at all, not at all, not at all; b) negative pronominal words: not at all, not at all, no one, no one, no one, never, nowhere, no not, nothing, nothing, nothing, etc. For convenience of explanation, we call them negative amplifiers. | a) This is not true at all; This case is by no means unique; This is by no means obvious; She is far from brave; He is by no means stupid; It's no fun to talk about it; Not in the least embarrassed; She is by no means more educated than her husband; b) The case is in no way suitable; A worthless project; He is no friend of mine; not at all envious, not needed by anyone, in no way useless, good for nothing, incapable of anything, not interesting in anything; He is not in the least prettier than his sister; |
| 3) *With short adjectives that are not used in full. | 3) not happy, not supposed to, not right, not visible, not intending, not disposed, not ready, not obligated, not needed, not agreeing. |
| 4) With full participles in the presence of dependent words (except for the words of degree enhancers, see the list) or opposition (as a general rule) | 4) Fields of rye not yet harvested could be seen. Not a laughing, but a crying child. |
| 4) * With verbal adjectives formed from transitive imperfective verbs with the help of suffixes -em-, -im- only if there is a dependent word in the instrumental case. | 4) The subject I did not like was to be taken this year. This case requires further explanation. It is necessary to distinguish between writing not with words in -my, formed from transitive imperfective verbs: such words can be both passive present participles and adjectives (in the first case, the spelling with is not separate, in the second - merged). They are participles if they use the instrumental case of the actor as an explanatory word, less often the instrumental instrument (the so-called instrumental); in the presence of other explanatory words, they become adjectives (lose the meaning of passiveness and the meaning of time and acquire a qualitative meaning). Compare: a child not loved by the mother - games unloved in childhood (in the second case, the word unloved indicates a permanent sign, meaning approximately the same as “unpleasant”, “undesirable”); motion not inhibited by air - the side of the moon invisible from the Earth. Adjectives of this type include: invisible, insane, inflammable, inextinguishable, immovable, indivisible, unforgettable, invisible, unchangeable, unloved, unthinkable, untaxable, inalienable, untranslatable, incommunicable, unknowable, unverifiable, unconjugated, intolerant and etc. Wed. their writing in the presence of explanatory words: a number indivisible by three, meetings that are unforgettable for us, through tears invisible to the world, records unthinkable in the recent past, feelings that cannot be expressed in simple words, accounts that have not been verified for a long time, mud that is impenetrable in springtime, nouns that are indeclinable in Russian , intolerant behavior in our society, etc. |
| 5) With verbs, gerunds, short participles, with numerals, conjunctions, particles, prepositions: | 5) was not, could not, without recognizing, not ordered, not removed, not one, not five, not that ... not that, not only, not above us. |
| 6) * With adverbs and words of the state category a) comparatively b) as a predicate impersonal predicate | 6) moved no louder, spoke no faster I don't need, she doesn't need |
| 7) in negative pronouns with an accented preposition | 7) not with anyone, not in anything, not about anyone |
| 7) in negative pronouns with a preposition without stress | 7) with no one, in nothing, about no one |
12.2 Continuous spelling NOT and NOR.
The particle is not written together:
| 1) If the word without NOT is not used. | a) Nouns: fable, tumbler, ignorance, ignoramus, adversity, unseen, invisible, slave, scoundrel, touchy, ailment, forget-me-not, hatred, bad weather, malfunctions, fidget, slob, foolish, loser, non-Christ; b) adjectives and adverbs derived from them: negligent, inconspicuous, irrevocable, unharmed, inevitable, unchanging, absurd, necessary, invincible, incessant, inseparable, inexpressible, endless, incessant, undoubted, incomparable, awkward, unfortunate, clumsy, unbearable, unshakable, indisputable, indomitable; carelessly, absurdly, necessary, undoubtedly; in) Verbs: to dislike, to dislike, to be indignant, to be unwell, to be unwell, to hate, to be unwell, to be sick, to be perplexed, to be numb, to be numb; G) adverbs and other invariable words: unbearable; unbearable; unbearable in spite of, in spite of (prepositions) |
| 2) *NOT is part of the prefix NEDO, which gives the verbs the meaning of incompleteness, insufficiency in comparison with some norm. The same rule also works in participles formed from verbs with the prefix NEDO. The prefix NEDO- is often antonymous with the prefix PERE-: undersalt - oversalt, underfulfilled - overfulfilled, underfilled - overfilled, underfilled - pass. | 2) The child was very lacking in the care of his parents. During the war, children were undernourished and undersleeped. Rozhdestvensky believed too much in his own strength, considering himself a genius, but underestimated the abilities of his opponent. |
| 3) With nouns, adjectives, adverbs in -o, -e, when a new word, a new concept is formed, often with a negative quality. | 3) misfortune (trouble), difficult (difficult), difficult, ugly, not far (close), nearby |
| 4) * In combination with adjectives and adverbs of the word denoting the degree of quality: very, extremely, quite, extremely, obviously, quite (pretty much), enough do not affect the continuous or separate spelling, therefore it is NOT written together. For the convenience of explanations, we call them strengths and degrees. | 4) A very unpleasant incident. A completely uninteresting game was invented. He spoke rather incomprehensibly. |
| 5) With full participles in the absence of dependent words or *when dependent words are degree enhancers | 5) We walked along the unlit streets of the town. I made a very rash decision. |
| 6) * In verbal adjectives formed from intransitive verbs or transitive perfective verbs with the help of suffixes -em-, -im-. These are not participles, since participles with suffixes -em, -them should only be imperfective, they are the present tense. | 6) unfading, inexhaustible, irreconcilable, irresistible, indomitable, inexhaustible, indestructible. |
| 7) in negative and indefinite pronouns and adverbs, depending on the stress, E or I, but together. | 7) nobody-nobody, nothing-nothing, nobody-nobody, nothing-nothing, nowhere-nowhere, nowhere-nowhere, no need-nothing, once-never. |
12.3. Particles NOT and NI differ in meaning:
For the correct choice of NE and NI particles, their semantic differences should be taken into account. Let's show them in tables.
The main uses of negative particles
| Particle NOT used | NI particle is used |
|---|---|
| 1) to express negation: There were no letters or telegrams. Brother does not look like a liar. Not the moon, not the stars interest me, but only meteorites. | 1) to strengthen the negation expressed by the particle NOT There were no letters or telegrams. The brother does not look like a deceiver or a joker. I'm not interested in the stars or the moon. |
| 2) to express a statement with a hint of obligation (double negation): He couldn't call. We couldn't help but notice. | 2) to express quantitative negation: The sky is clear. Not a dewdrop in my mouth. |
| 3) to express impossibility in impersonal sentences: Do not catch up with you crazy trio! Do not be war-fire! | 3) for the emotional expression of a prohibition, order, duty: Not one step back! Not a sound! Not a day without a line! |
| 4) when expressing uncertainty, fear or admiration: Are you my guest? No matter how frost strikes! Why not a hero! | 4) for the expression of uncertainty: He is neither old nor young, neither fat nor thin (cf.: He is either old or young). In phraseological units: Neither this nor that, neither fish nor meat. |
| 5) in interrogative-exclamatory sentences when expressing an underlined statement: Who has not cursed the stationmasters, who has not scolded them! (A. Pushkin) Is it not true that we have grown wiser? With your condition, how not to get married? (L. Tolstoy) | 5) in subordinate clauses with a generalized amplifying meaning (with allied words: whoever .., whatever .., wherever .. etc.). Whatever the child amuses, if only he does not cry. Whenever you ask him, he will not reach into his pocket for a word. |
Difficult cases of distinguishing between NI and NOT
| 1. In subordinate clauses. Compare: | |
| Does NOT express negation: When the brother did not come, everyone felt bored. There are no wars where soldiers do not die. | NI expresses a statement with a touch of generality: Whenever a brother came, he always brought animation and joy. Wherever soldiers die, they should be remembered and honored. |
| 2. In revolutions not one and none; not once and never. Compare: | |
| Doesn't express negation Not one of us (ie many) was ready for the ascent. More than once (that is, many times) I had to meet with a wild beast. | Ni expresses the strengthening of negation: None of us (i.e. none) were to ascend. Not once (i.e. never) did I have to meet with a wild beast. |
| 3. In pronominal phrases. Compare: | |
| Emphasizing phrases with NOT contain the meaning of a hidden opposition and are used in affirmative sentences (cf .: none other, but ..) None other than a woodpecker thumped dully in the forest. Before us was nothing but an ancient cave. | These turns are used in negative sentences and serve to strengthen the negation: nobody ... not; nothing is not: No one else would lead us to the right path. Nothing but music fascinated me so much. |
Remember!
Composite amplifying revolutions with a particle neither:
no matter what, no matter what, wherever, wherever, as if nothing had happened, etc.
Spelling varies not with verbal adjectives my and with participles -my; in the presence of explanatory words, the first ones are written together (like denominative adjectives), the second ones - separately, for example:
a) uninhabited long time island insoluble crystals in water indistinguishable figures of people in the dark;
b) reserves not visited by hunters, unreadable non-specialist magazines, not favorite mother child.
For adjectives on my include words formed from intransitive verbs (for example: independent, waterproof, fireproof) or from perfective verbs (for example: incorrigible, unworkable, indestructible). These words are subject to the general spelling rules not with adjectives, i.e. they are written together and in the presence of explanatory words (see examples above), as well as in short form (for example: island uninhabited, disease incurable, these countries are economically independent). However, the rule of separate writing of adjectives with not, if pronouns and adverbs starting with neither, or combinations far from, not at all, not at all(see above, paragraph 6, note 1. subparagraph 2), for example: with nothing incomparable impression, countries not dependent on anyone, by no means insoluble crystals; this phenomenon is neither from life nor from art not removable. The exception is words that not not used, for example: by no one invincible army, for no one incomprehensible case, under no circumstances unique experiment.
Note.
The spelling must be distinguished not with words to my formed from transitive imperfective verbs: such words can be either passive present participles or adjectives (in the first case, writing with not separate, in the second - merged). They are participles if they use the instrumental case of the actor as an explanatory word, less often the instrumental instrument (the so-called instrumental); in the presence of other explanatory words, they become adjectives (lose the meaning of passiveness and the meaning of time and acquire a qualitative meaning). Wed: not favorite mother child - unloved in childhood, play (in the second case, the word unloved indicates a permanent feature, meaning approximately the same as “unpleasant”, “undesirable”); traffic, not braked air - invisible from the Earth side of the Moon.
Adjectives of this type include: invisible, insane, inflammable, inextinguishable, immovable, indivisible, unforgettable, invisible, unchangeable, unloved, unthinkable, tax-free, inalienable, untranslatable, incommunicable, unknowable, unverifiable, unconjugated, intolerant, etc. Cf. their spelling in the presence of explanatory words: indivisible for three number unforgettable meeting for us, through invisible world tears, unthinkable recent records, non-transferable in simple terms feelings unverifiable for a long time accounts, impassable mud in the spring indeclinable nouns in Russian intolerable behavior in our society, etc.
My dear wife!
Departing on a campaign, I found it necessary, in accordance with the duty of the law and the obligations of my rank, equally and of Our Union, to leave you this letter, as to the person who has all my power of attorney mainly, both in her position and in the qualities of her soul and mind, I am so famous and precious.
I call on God's blessing on you and on Myself, I leave my children here under the eyes of my Most Beloved Mother and yours, with a full investigative certificate of their preservation and safety.
You know my heart and soul, and that I do not place my true pleasure and the supreme position of my being in anything else, as in the common good and its integrity.
This feeling has guided and always will guide all My deeds. It, united with filial love, makes me wish zealously that with real reign, the prosperity of the Fatherland will continue, as long as possible.
But my natural debt to him, and my heartfelt attachment to him, are so great that his provision alone now occupies my whole soul and has become the reason for this letter of mine to you, my dear wife.
Imagining the possibility of incidents that could happen in my absence, nothing is more sad for me, but for the Fatherland I can imagine more sensitively, as if by external providence it was destined at this very time to lose my mother, and Him the Empress.
Such an event would be a true visitation of God upon Us.
I confess to you that I consider it such a blow, which the possibility would remove with everything from my thoughts for my peace of mind, if my love for the Fatherland, and my duty to it did not impose on my conscience my obligation to grieve myself with the imagination of the possibility of this incident in order to so that His integrity and security at that unfortunate moment remain unshakable.
That's my whole intention; and since it is based on a single precaution, then I don’t want my will, now revealed to you, to be wrapped around the form of the Sovereign’s command ahead of time.
I will tell you only the measures that I recognize as necessary in this accident, the execution of which, with full power of attorney, I entrust to you, to whom love for me and zeal for the Fatherland and me, and Him are so known.
In the rightness of your soul and advice I have always found direct joy and benefit; and so I would have sinned before the Fatherland and before myself, if I had not especially entrusted you with the execution of all that, in my absence, for such a case, I need to supply.
First, I instruct you, as soon as the moment of this accident occurs, to immediately announce to the Senate, the Synod and the first three Colleges this letter of mine to you, the contents of which at the same hour will take on the force of My exact will and command, by which I confirm you as the ruler for the time of my absence, why make this unfortunate incident public, and announce this letter in the Senate, with the assurance of my good will to everyone. Order on behalf of My Synod, the Senate and the first three Colleges to accept from everyone the due oath to me and to my Son Alexander, as the heir, reassuring me with the indispensable care of my true welfare of all. Announce to the Synod, the Senate and the three Collegias to remain in their former rank suit, relatively to the exercise on State current affairs.
The Senate, the Synod, the first three Colleges, all other civil, military and judicial places, the chiefs of various commands and institutions, in a word, all places and all bosses, without exception, must, without the slightest stop, dispatch, according to their ranks, all ordinary current affairs , on already legalized grounds, which everyone has to remain exactly in the same position until my return, without introducing any and even the slightest news (and) changes into them, for whatever reasons and reasons.
You, as the Ruler, look with a vigilant eye so that it is everywhere, and in all accuracy it is observed.
To you, Dear Wife, I entrust, especially at the very moment of the alleged misfortune, from which God remove us, all of the Empress’s own Cabinet and papers, having gathered with me in one place, seal it with the State seal, attach reliable guards to them, and say My will, so that the imposed the seals remained intact until My return.
If in some government, or in the hands of a private person, there remained unknown to me, any command, decrees, or orders not published, until my return, they would remain not only without any and the slightest action, but and in the same impenetrable mystery in which they were preserved until that hour.
With anyone who dares to violate, or gives himself a fair suspicion of being ready (n) to break this will of mine, you have to act according to the circumstances, as with a real person, or as with a suspected State Villain, leaving the final fate of his decision to me on my own. my return; then I remain your faithful.
St. Petersburg. January 4th, 1788.
My dear wife!
God was pleased to bring me into the world for that state, which, although I did not achieve, but no less, all my life I strove to become worthy. His providence united me with you, Dear wife, at such a time for both of us, which no human insight could predestinate, and thereby showed both of us in an immediate way His will, and imprinted it, fulfilling Our union of Love and Concord, and giving us Pledge of this, children Beloved to Us. We have not deserved such His special mercy, and we should attribute it to His care for the Fatherland. O great obligations are entrusted to Us! Both of them you, O dearest Wife, fulfill, and I, at my last hour, help you with advice. But before I begin this important help, I must open my heart to you. You yourself know how much I loved you and was attached. Your purest soul before God and man was worth not only this, but respect from me and from everyone. You were my first joy and gave the best advice. I owe this confession before the whole world about your prudence. Attachment to children, the key to affection and love for me was. In one word, I can’t say enough gratitude to you for all this, evenly and for your patience, with which you endured your condition, for the sake of me and according to humanity, boredom and sorrow that occur in our life, for which I ask your forgiveness and for all this I owe you the following advice. Be steadfast in the Law which you have accepted and strive to keep His integrity in the State. Don't bother anyone's conscience. The state considers you its own, you deserve this, and you honor Him with your fatherland. Love Him and go forward to His good. I teach you the means to do so. You read my papers and you will find in them what I want from you and from my children, and fulfill it accordingly. Here is the greatest reward for your virtues, the glory that you will gain by doing what remains for the Fatherland and for which you acted with such determination and willingness. Your prudence will guide you on the right path and God will bless your good intentions. Strive for the direct good of everyone and everyone. Raise your children in the fear of God, as the beginning of Wisdom, in kindness, as the foundation of all virtues. Strive to teach them the sciences required for their rank, as that by teaching knowledge you open the mind. Do not neglect bodily benefits either, for from them health leads to labor and a good-looking appearance that captivates the eyes. All this tend to promote cheerfulness and firmness of spirit, which, being strained for good, all the qualities of the soul. Strengthen them in my intention about the inheritance and the law of it, and in putting the other parts in order, but try to instill in them that every person must submit himself to reason, and especially such, which God is called to subordinate the passions of others and control People and the whole State and Nation . Such submission alone can keep others in it, and especially his own descendants, setting an example for them, and calming his own conscience. Distinguish those who were faithful to us and were attached. You know their names, equally as well as exploits. Be merciful and indulgent and follow in this Your benevolent soul. Reward all those who have served with us. Those who brought up both you and me especially reward. Together with this, you will receive my will about children and other orders. Take it all apart and do it in your own time, but meanwhile be strengthened by patience and virtue. God bless your whole life. Forgive my friend, remember me, but do not cry for me; obey the will of the one who directs everything for the better. Please accept my thanks. Your always faithful Husband and friend
St. Petersburg. Genvara 4 days, 1788
Explanation
In the second sentence, the word DISCONTINUED - this is a full participle, in which there is no dependent word. So, it is NOT written together: The incessant rains ruined all our plans
In the third sentence, the word SPAL He barely slept at night.
THINKING - this is a participle with a dependent word ABOUT BENEFITS. So, NOT written separately: Only a person who does not think about the benefits of the forest can do this.
In the fifth sentence, the word EXPENSIVE - this is an adjective, to which there is a direct opposition to the union A, which means it is NOT written separately: Chintz is not expensive, but cheap.
Therefore, the correct answer is the word ONGOING from the second sentence.
Explanation
In order to determine whether a word is written together (or separately) with NOT (or NI), you first need to determine which part of speech this word refers to, and then select the appropriate rule.
In the second sentence, the word AVAILABLE - this is a participle with a dependent word DESCRIPTION, which means it is NOT written separately: I had to endure an indescribable horror.
In the third sentence, the word IT WAS He had no conscience, no kindness, no honesty.
In the fourth sentence, the word MISSING - this is a verb with the prefix NEDO- in the meaning of "to be in insufficient quantity", which is written together: Often there is a lack of determination to defend their convictions.
In the fifth sentence, the word MTF - this is a verb that is NOT written separately with a particle: No one could call him an evil man
Therefore, the correct answer is the word MISSING from the fourth sentence.
Explanation
In order to determine whether a word is written together (or separately) with NOT (or NI), you first need to determine which part of speech this word refers to, and then select the appropriate rule.
In the first sentence, the word VISIBLE is a participle, because in addition to the dependent word yet there is a dependent word EYE - a noun in the instrumental case. So, do NOT write separately: The sun, not yet visible to the eye, spread a fan of pink rays across the sky.
In the second sentence, the word UNHURRY is an adjective. The sentence contains an adversative union BUT, but there is no direct opposition, but there is a concessive meaning - albeit slow, but determined. So, in this case, it is NOT written together: Valentine walked slowly, but decisively.
In the third sentence, the word RAW is an adjective. In this sentence there is an adversative union A and there is a direct opposition. So, NOT in this case is written separately: Deep autumn dragged on, no longer damp and rainy, but dry and windy.
In the fourth sentence, the word IT WAS - this is a verb that is NOT written separately with a particle: There was no one around.
In the fifth sentence, the word SHUTTERING - this is a gerund that is NOT written separately with a particle: Foliage hangs without moving.
Therefore, the correct answer is the word SLOW from the second sentence.
Explanation
In order to determine whether a word is written together (or separately) with NOT (or NI), you first need to determine which part of speech this word refers to, and then select the appropriate rule.
In the first sentence IN SPITE OF - this is a derivative preposition with a concessive meaning (although it was deep autumn, the days were warm). NOT in this preposition is written together: Despite deep autumn, the days were warm and clear. Do not confuse this preposition with a gerund derived from the verb look, with a particle NOT ( played without looking at the notes).
In the second sentence, the word IT WAS - this is a verb that is NOT always written separately with a particle: Weren't you bored?
In the third sentence, it does NOT refer to a noun EGOIST preceded by the definition ( immoral), separating a noun and a particle NOT. In addition, there is a semantic opposition with the union A (a child, not an egoist), therefore NOT with in this case is written separately: Oblomov is a child, not an immoral egoist.
In the fourth sentence, the word BUILT - this is a short participle, which is NOT written separately with a particle: Bridge not built yet.
In the fifth sentence, the word EVIL - this is an adjective, in the sentence there is a direct opposition to the union A (not evil, but good). So, NOT written separately: His sleepy face was not evil, but rather kind.COLD preceded by the definition ( coming), separating a noun and a particle NOT. In addition, there is a semantic opposition with the union A (not cold, but lack of food), therefore, NOT in this case is written separately: The birds are driven south not by the coming cold, but by the lack of food.
In the third sentence, the word INEXHAUSTABLE is a short adjective my , which is not used without NOT (inexhaustible). So, we write NOT together: As a child, Chekhov was inexhaustible in inventions.
The fourth word is LIT - participle with the dependent word STILL, therefore it is NOT written separately: Andrey entered the yet unlit hotel lobby.
In the fifth sentence, the word WANTED - a verb that is NOT written separately with a particle: I didn't want to go home.
Therefore, the correct answer is the word UNEXHAUSTABLE from the third sentence.
