Since 1503, a 50-year truce was in effect with the Livonian Order with the payment of the Yuryev tribute.
In 1554, it was extended for another 15 years.
In the Baltic States, the interests of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania, Sweden, Poland, Denmark and Russia clashed.
Reasons for the start of the Livonian War
1) weakening of the order;
2) land suitable for local distribution;
3) opportunities for expanding foreign trade (not so much the merchants as the king is interested in this, since sales are needed from the palace volosts);
4) hope to weaken the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.
Russian diplomatic miscalculation
They defeated Sweden in 1554-57, and considered that it was weakened.
They decided that the union of Sweden and Denmark is impossible.
It was decided that Lithuania would be neutral, since in 1556 the truce was extended for six years.
In 1558, having accused Livonia of non-payment of the Yuryev tribute, Moscow was the first to start the war.
Stage 1. 1558 - 1560 - commanded by M.V. Glinsky and Shah-Ali Kazansky. Almost all of Livonia is occupied. The master of the order is in captivity. Hasty distribution of estates → discontent of the population.
The Polish king Sigismund II August agreed with the new Livonian master on the vassal dependence of the order on Poland and the Grand Duke of Lithuania. He left the territory of Courland to himself. Part of the Livonian territories was ceded to Denmark (Ezel Island) and Sweden (northern Estonia). → new opponents do not intend to give their possessions to Moscow.
And so there is no Livonian Order, and the war has acquired a much greater danger, since the opponents are strong.
Stage 2. 1561 - 1577 - Ivan 4 himself commanded.
Russians are defeated on the territory of Belarus (Polotsk, Orsha).
Kurbsky's betrayal.
Repeated truce negotiations fail.
Operations on the Baltic coast are unsuccessful.
1570 - Russia achieved the proclamation of the Livonian kingdom. The Danish duke Magnus became its king.
This year began a five-year queenlessness in Poland. Ivan 4 lays claim to the Polish throne.
But since 1575 Stefan Batory became the king of Poland.
In 1577, the Russians recaptured many of the Livonian fortresses and pushed back the troops of Stefan Batory.
Stage 3. 1578 - 1583 years
Russian transition to defensive tactics. The Lithuanian troops were replaced by stronger Polish ones. Magnus went over to the side of Poland.
Since 1579, hostilities moved to Russian lands
1579 - the first campaign of Batory.
1580 - the second campaign of Batory
1583 - the third campaign of Batory.
The Russians lost Polotsk, Sokol, Velikiye Luki, Toropets.
In the siege of Pskov. Ivan Petrovich Shuisky was able to keep the fortress.
The Swedes began to advance.
1581 - the Swedes took Narva.
Negotiation.
1582 - Yam-Zapolsky truce with Poland for 10 years. Russia abandoned Livonia, Polotsk, Velizh.
1583 - Plyussky truce with Sweden. Russia abandoned Pit, Koporye, Ivan Gorod and conquered the territory of Finland.
The outcome of the war is the complete defeat of Moscow.
Until 1584 - the hope of an alliance with England to continue the war.
Reasons for the defeat :
1) lack of internal resources;
2) diplomatic isolation;
3) internal political instability → inconsistency of command.
Consequences of defeat
Deepening economic and political crisis.
Relations with Western Europe after the Livonian War.
1586 - S. Batory died and Fyodor Ioanovich claimed the Polish throne. Lost to the Swedish prince Sigismund.
1590 - 1595 - war with Sweden. Tsar Fedor and the queen were in Novgorod. F. Mstislavsky and D. Khvorostinin commanded. Yam is taken. Narva is besieged.
1595 - Tyavzinsky world. Returned Yam, Ivan Gorod, Koporye, Korela.
For him, the war has become a truly part of the reign and, one might even say, a matter of life.
It cannot be said that Livonia was a strong state. The formation of the Livonian state is attributed to the XIII century, by the XIV century it was considered weak and fragmented. The Order of the Knights of the Sword headed the state, although he did not have absolute power.
The order throughout its existence prevented Russia from establishing diplomatic relations with other European countries.
Reasons for the start of the Livonian War
The reason for the start of the Livonian War was the non-payment of the Yuryev tribute, which, by the way, happened throughout the entire period, after the conclusion of the treaty in 1503.
In 1557, the Livonian Order entered into a military agreement with the Polish king. In January of the following year, Ivan the Terrible advanced his troops to Livonian territory. During 1558 and by the beginning of 1559, the Russian army had already passed all of Livonia and was at the borders of East Prussia. Yuriev and Narva were also captured.
The Livonian Order needed to make peace in order to avoid complete defeat. In 1559, a truce was concluded, but it lasted only six months. Hostilities continued again, and the end of this company was the complete destruction of the Livonian Order. The main fortresses of the Order were captured: Fellin and Marienburg, and the master himself was captured.
However, after the defeat of the order, its lands began to belong to Poland, Sweden and Denmark, which, accordingly, dramatically complicated the situation on the war map for Russia.
Sweden and Denmark were at war with each other, and therefore for Russia this meant a war in one direction - with the king of Poland, Sigismund II. At first, success in military operations accompanied the Russian army: in 1563, Ivan IV took Polotsk. But the victories stopped there, and the Russian troops began to suffer defeats.
Ivan IV saw the solution to this problem in the restoration of the Livonian Order under the auspices of Russia. It was also decided to conclude peace with Poland. However, this decision was not supported by the Zemsky Sobor, and the tsar had to continue the war.
The war dragged on, and in 1569 a new state was created called the Commonwealth, which included Lithuania and Poland. With the Commonwealth still managed to make peace for 3 years. At the same time, Ivan IV creates a state on the territory of the Livonian Order and puts Magnus, the brother of the Danish king, at the head.
In the speech of the Commonwealth at this time, a new king was elected - Stefan Batory. After that, the war continued. Sweden entered the war, and Batory laid siege to Russian fortresses. He took Velikiye Luki and Polotsk, and in August 1581 approached Pskov. The inhabitants of Pskov swore an oath that they would fight for Pskov until their death. After the 31st unsuccessful assault, the siege was lifted. And although Bathory failed to capture Pskov, the Swedes at that time occupied Narva.
Results of the Livonian War
In 1582, peace was concluded with the Commonwealth for 10 years. According to the agreement, Russia lost Livonia along with the Belarusian lands, although it received some border territories. A peace agreement was concluded with Sweden for a period of three years (Plus Armistice). According to him, Russia lost Koporye, Ivangorod, Yam and adjacent territories. The main and saddest fact was that Russia remained cut off from the sea.
1) 1558–1561 - Russian troops completed the defeat of the Livonian Order, took Narva, Tartu (Derpt), approached Tallinn (Revel) and Riga;
2) 1561–1578 - the war with Livonia turned for Russia into a war against Poland, Lithuania, Sweden, Denmark. The hostilities became protracted. Russian troops fought with varying success, occupying a number of Baltic fortresses in the summer of 1577. However, the situation was complicated:
The weakening of the country's economy as a result of the ruin of the guardsmen;
A change in the attitude of the local population towards the Russian troops as a result of military raids;
By going over to the side of the enemy, Prince Kurbsky, one of the most prominent Russian military leaders, who, moreover, knew the military plans of Ivan the Terrible;
Devastating raids on the Russian lands of the Crimean Tatars;
3) 1578–1583 - defensive actions of Russia. In 1569, Poland and Lithuania united into a single state - the Commonwealth. Stefan Batory, elected to the throne, went on the offensive; since 1579, Russian troops fought defensive battles. In 1579, Polotsk was taken, in 1581 - Velikiye Luki, the Poles besieged Pskov. The heroic defense of Pskov began (it was headed by the voivode I.P. Shuisky), which lasted five months. The courage of the defenders of the city prompted Stefan Batory to abandon further siege.
The Livonian War ended with the signing of unfavorable for Russia Yam-Zapolsky (with Poland) and Plyussky (with Sweden) truces. The Russians had to abandon the conquered lands and cities. The Baltic lands were occupied by Poland and Sweden. The war exhausted Russia's forces. The main task - the conquest of access to the Baltic Sea - was not solved.
Assessing the foreign policy of Russia in the XVI century. - the conquest of the Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1556) khanates, the Livonian War (1558–1583), the beginning of the colonization of Siberia, the creation of a defensive line of the Muscovite state that protected against devastating raids, mainly from the Crimean Khanate, it is important to keep in mind that the greatest The country achieved foreign policy successes in the first period of the reign of Ivan the Terrible (50-60s).
In addition, it must be emphasized that Russia's military policy was determined not only by its fundamentally natural desire to defend the young statehood, secure borders, overcome the syndrome of more than two hundred years of yoke, finally reach the Baltic Sea, but also by expansionist and predatory aspirations. generated by the very logic of the formation of a centralized state and the interests of the military service class.
Features of the political development of the Muscovite state in the XVI century.
Unlike Europe, where national centralized states were formed, the unification of the Russian lands into the Muscovite state did not yet mean their merging into a single political and economic whole.
Throughout the 16th century there was a complex and contradictory process of centralization, the elimination of the specific system.
In the study of the features of the political development of the Russian state in the XVI century. some of the most controversial issues can be identified.
In domestic and foreign literature, there is no consensus on the definition of the state form, established in Russia. Some authors characterize this form as a class-representative monarchy, others - as a class.
Some define the political system of Russia in the 16th century. as autocracy, understanding by it the despotic form of absolutism and even Eastern despotism.
The discussion is influenced by the following factors:
Firstly, demonization in assessing the personality and politics of Ivan the Terrible, which was initiated by N.M. Karamzin;
Secondly, the vagueness of the concepts of "autocracy", "absolutism", "oriental despotism", their relationship.
The formal-legal, or purely rational, definition of these concepts does not take into account the traditional power characteristic of the medieval worldview, which influenced the essence and form of statehood. Autocracy in the 16th century - this is the Russian national form of Orthodox estate statehood, a churched state, which cannot be identified either with varieties of Eastern despotism or with European absolutism, at least before the reforms of Peter I (V.F. Patrakov).
MM. Shumilov drew attention to the fact that the opinions of the authors differ in characterizing the Russian autocracy. So, according to R. Pipes, the autocratic system in Russia was formed under the influence of the Golden Horde. The American historian believes that since for centuries the khan was the absolute master over the Russian princes, then "his power and greatness almost completely erased the image of the Byzantine basileus from memory." The latter was something very remote, a legend; none of the specific princes had ever been to Constantinople, but many of them knew the road to Saray very well.
It was in Saray that the princes had the opportunity to closely contemplate the power, "with which one cannot enter into an agreement, which must be obeyed unconditionally." Here they learned to tax courts and trade deals, conduct diplomatic relations, manage a courier service, and crack down on recalcitrant subjects.
S.G. Pushkarev believed that the political system of the Russian state was formed under the influence of the Byzantine church-political culture, and the power of the Moscow grand dukes (Ivan III, Vasily III) and tsars (with the exception of Ivan IV) was only formally unlimited. “In general, the Moscow sovereign was - not formally, but morally - limited by old customs and traditions, especially church ones. The Moscow sovereign could not and did not want to do what "did not happen."
Depending on the answer to the question about the essence of monarchical power in Russia, historians also speak differently regarding the political role of the Boyar Duma. So, according to R. Pipes, the Duma, having neither legislative nor executive power, performed only the functions of a registration institution that approved the decisions of the king. “The Duma,” he said, “did not have a number of important features that distinguish institutions that have real political power. Its composition was extremely unstable ... There was no regular schedule of meetings. There were no minutes of discussions, and the only evidence of the participation of the Duma in the development of decisions is the formula written in the text of many decrees: "The king indicated, and the boyars were sentenced." The Duma did not have a clearly defined sphere of activity.
In the XVI century. The Duma turned into a permanent government institution, where Duma people acted not only as advisers to the tsar on issues of legislation and administration, not only participated in the development of decisions, often discussing, and sometimes objecting to the tsar, but also managed central orders, carried out special assignments for central and local affairs. administration (V.O. Klyuchevsky).
Another facet of the question of the essence of Russian statehood in the 16th century. - activities of zemstvo sobors in 1549–1550, 1566 and 1598, the study of their formation, functions and relationships with the tsar.
Attempts to solve this problem in the spirit of Eurocentric concepts that dominate historiography give polar, sometimes mutually exclusive points of view of researchers. Zemsky Sobors in Russia did not have a permanent composition, clearly defined functions, in contrast to the class-representative authorities of European countries. If the Parliament in England, the States General in France and other class-representative bodies arose as a counterbalance to the royal power and were, as a rule, in opposition to it, then the Zemsky Sobors never came into conflict with the tsar.
In historical studies, an opinion is often expressed about the class-representative nature of the Zemsky Sobors (S.G. Goryainov, I.A. Isaev, etc.). However, M.M. Shumilov believes that, apparently, Zemsky Sobors of the 16th century. were neither popular, nor class-representative institutions, nor advisory bodies under the tsar. Unlike the corresponding institutions of Western Europe, they did not interfere in public administration, did not seek any political rights for themselves, and did not even perform advisory functions. The participants of the first Zemsky Sobors were not elected representatives. Their composition was dominated by representatives of the upper capital nobility and merchants appointed or called by the government itself. Although the work of the Zemsky Sobor of 1598, unlike the previous ones, was also attended by elected representatives who vouched for their worlds, however, it was still not they who prevailed, but representatives of the government itself: holders of power of various degrees, officials, managers, "agents of military and financial institutions "(V.O. Klyuchevsky). All of them were convened to councils not to tell the government about the needs and desires of their constituents, and not to discuss socially significant issues, and not to give the government any powers. Their competence was to answer questions, and they themselves had to return home as responsible executors of conciliar obligations (in fact, government decisions).
Nevertheless, it is difficult to agree with the opinion of some foreign and domestic historians about the underdevelopment of Zemsky Sobors. According to V.F. Patrakova, if the idea of separation of powers is being formed in the West, then in Russia the idea of conciliarity of power is developing on the basis of its spiritual, Orthodox community. Ideally, in the Councils a spiritual and mystical unity of kings and people was achieved (including through mutual repentance), which corresponded to Orthodox ideas about power.
Thus, in the XVI century. Russia has become a state with an autocratic political system. The sole bearer of state power, its head was the Moscow Grand Duke (Tsar). In his hands concentrated all the power of the legislative, executive and judicial. All governmental actions were carried out on his behalf and according to his personal decrees.
In the XVI century. in Russia, the birth of an empire and imperial politics takes place (R.G. Skrynnikov). Almost all historians see in the oprichnina one of the factors that prepared the Time of Troubles at the beginning of the 17th century.
Livonian War |
||
The struggle of Russia, Sweden, Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania for the "Livonian heritage" |
||
Victory of the Commonwealth and Sweden |
||
Territorial changes: |
Annexation by the Commonwealth of Velizh and Livonia; Swedish annexation of Ingria and Karelia |
|
Opponents |
||
Livonian Confederation (1558-1561) |
||
Don Army (1570-1583) |
Kingdom of Poland (1563-1569) |
|
Livonian Kingdom (1570-1577) |
Grand Duchy of Lithuania (1563-1569) |
|
Sweden (1563-1583) |
||
Army Zaporozhye (1568-1582) |
||
Rzeczpospolita (1569-1582) |
||
Commanders |
||
Ivan IV the Terrible Khan Shah Ali King of Livonia Magnus in 1570-1577 |
Former King Magnus after 1577 Stefan Batory |
Frederick II |
Livonian War(1558-1583) was fought by the Russian Kingdom for the territories in the Baltic and access to the Baltic Sea in order to break the blockade from the Livonian Confederation, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Sweden and establish direct communication with European countries.
background
The Livonian Confederation was interested in controlling the transit of Russian trade and significantly limited the possibilities of Russian merchants. In particular, all trade exchange with Europe could be carried out only through the Livonian ports of Riga, Lindanise (Revel), Narva, and it was possible to transport goods only on the ships of the Hanseatic League. At the same time, fearing the military and economic strengthening of Russia, the Livonian Confederation prevented the transport of strategic raw materials and specialists to Russia (see the Schlitte case), receiving the assistance of Hansa, Poland, Sweden and the German imperial authorities in this.
In 1503, Ivan III concluded a truce with the Livonian Confederation for 50 years, according to which it had to annually pay tribute (the so-called "Yuriev tribute") for the city of Yuryev (Derpt), which previously belonged to Novgorod. Treaties between Moscow and Derpt in the 16th century traditionally referred to the "Yuryev tribute", but in fact it had long been forgotten. When the truce expired, during the negotiations in 1554, Ivan IV demanded the return of arrears, the refusal of the Livonian Confederation from military alliances with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Sweden, and the continuation of the truce.
The first payment of the debt for Dorpat was to take place in 1557, but the Livonian Confederation did not fulfill its obligation.
In 1557, in the city of Posvol, an agreement was concluded between the Livonian Confederation and the Kingdom of Poland, establishing the vassal dependence of the Order on Poland.
In the spring of 1557, Tsar Ivan IV set up a port on the banks of the Narva ( “The same year, July, a city was set up from the German Ust-Narova River Rozsen by the sea for the shelter of a sea ship”). However, Livonia and the Hanseatic League do not allow European merchants to enter the new Russian port, and they are forced to go, as before, to the Livonian ports.
The course of the war
By the beginning of the war, the Livonian Confederation was weakened by a defeat in a conflict with the Archbishop of Riga and Sigismund II Augustus. In addition, the already heterogeneous Livonian society was even more split as a result of the reformation. On the other hand, Russia was gaining strength after victories over the Kazan and Astrakhan khanates and the annexation of Kabarda.
War with the Livonian Confederation
Russia started the war on January 17, 1558. The invasion of Russian troops in January-February 1558 into the Livonian lands was a reconnaissance raid. It was attended by 40 thousand people under the command of Khan Shig-Aley (Shah-Ali), governor of Glinsky and Zakharyin-Yuriev. They passed through the eastern part of Estonia and returned back by the beginning of March. The Russian side motivated this campaign solely by the desire to receive the due tribute from Livonia. The Livonian Landtag decided to collect 60 thousand thalers for settlement with Moscow in order to stop the outbreak of war. However, by May, only half of the amount claimed had been collected. In addition, the Narva garrison fired on the Ivangorod fortress, which violated the ceasefire agreement.
This time a more powerful army moved to Livonia. The Livonian Confederation at that time could put in the field, not counting the fortress garrisons, no more than 10 thousand. Thus, its main military asset was the powerful stone walls of the fortresses, which by this time could no longer effectively withstand the power of heavy siege weapons.
Governors Aleksey Basmanov and Danila Adashev arrived in Ivangorod. In April 1558, Russian troops laid siege to Narva. The fortress was defended by a garrison under the command of the knight Focht Schnellenberg. On May 11, a fire broke out in the city, accompanied by a storm (according to the Nikon chronicle, the fire occurred due to the fact that drunken Livonians threw an Orthodox icon of the Virgin into the fire). Taking advantage of the fact that the guards left the city walls, the Russians rushed to the assault. They broke through the gates and took possession of the lower city. Having seized the guns located there, the warriors deployed them and opened fire on the upper castle, preparing the stairs for the attack. However, the defenders of the castle themselves surrendered by the evening, on the terms of a free exit from the city.
The defense of the Neuhausen fortress distinguished itself with particular perseverance. She was defended by several hundred soldiers led by the knight von Padenorm, who for almost a month repelled the onslaught of the governor Peter Shuisky. On June 30, 1558, after the destruction of the fortress walls and towers by Russian artillery, the Germans retreated to the upper castle. Von Padenorm expressed a desire to keep the defense here, but the surviving defenders of the fortress refused to continue senseless resistance. As a sign of respect for their courage, Peter Shuisky allowed them to leave the fortress with honor.
In July, P. Shuisky laid siege to Dorpat. The city was defended by a garrison of 2,000 men under the command of Bishop Hermann Weiland. Having built a shaft at the level of the fortress walls and installing guns on it, on July 11, Russian artillery began shelling the city. The cores pierced the tiles of the roofs of houses, filling up the inhabitants who were hiding there. On July 15, P. Shuisky offered Weiland to surrender. While he thought, the bombardment continued. Some towers and loopholes were destroyed. Having lost hope of outside help, the besieged decided to enter into negotiations with the Russians. P. Shuisky promised not to destroy the city to the ground and to preserve its former administration for its inhabitants. July 18, 1558 Dorpat capitulated. The troops were stationed in abandoned houses. In one of them, the warriors found 80 thousand thalers in a cache. The Livonian historian bitterly narrates that, because of their greed, the Derptians lost more than the Russian Tsar demanded from them. The funds found would be enough not only for the Yuryev tribute, but also for hiring troops to protect the Livonian Confederation.
In May-October 1558, Russian troops took 20 fortress cities, including those that voluntarily surrendered and became subjects of the Russian Tsar, after which they went to their winter quarters, leaving small garrisons in the cities. The new energetic master Gotthard Ketler took advantage of this. Gathering 10,000 army, he decided to return the lost. At the end of 1558, Ketler approached the Ringen fortress, which was defended by a garrison of several hundred archers under the command of governor Rusin-Ignatiev. A detachment of governor Repnin (2 thousand people) went to help the besieged, but he was defeated by Ketler. However, the Russian garrison continued to defend the fortress for five weeks, and only when the defenders ran out of gunpowder, the Germans managed to take the fortress by storm. The entire garrison was killed. Having lost a fifth of his troops near Ringen (2 thousand people) and spending more than a month on the siege of one fortress, Ketler was unable to build on his success. At the end of October 1558, his army retreated to Riga. This small victory turned into a big disaster for the Livonians.
In response to the actions of the Livonian Confederation, two months after the fall of the Ringen fortress, Russian troops carried out a winter raid, which was a punitive operation. In January 1559, the prince-voivode Serebryany at the head of the army entered Livonia. The Livonian army under the command of the knight Felkenzam came out to meet him. On January 17, at the Battle of Terzen, the Germans were completely defeated. Felkenzam and 400 knights (not counting ordinary soldiers) died in this battle, the rest were captured or fled. This victory opened wide the gates to Livonia for the Russians. They freely passed through the lands of the Livonian Confederation, captured 11 cities and reached Riga, where they burned the Riga fleet on the Dyunamun raid. Then Courland lay on the path of the Russian army and, having passed it, they reached the Prussian border. In February, the army returned home with huge booty and a large number of prisoners.
After the winter raid of 1559, Ivan IV granted the Livonian Confederation a truce (the third in a row) from March to November, without consolidating his success. This miscalculation was due to a number of reasons. Moscow was under serious pressure from Lithuania, Poland, Sweden and Denmark, which had their own views on the Livonian lands. From March 1559, Lithuanian ambassadors urged Ivan IV to stop hostilities in Livonia, threatening, otherwise, to take the side of the Livonian Confederation. Soon, the Swedish and Danish ambassadors addressed with requests to stop the war.
With its invasion of Livonia, Russia also affected the trade interests of a number of European states. Trade on the Baltic Sea then grew from year to year and the question of who would control it was relevant. Reval merchants, having lost the most important item of their profits - income from Russian transit, complained to the Swedish king: “ We stand on the walls and watch with tears as merchant ships go past our city to the Russians in Narva».
In addition, the presence of Russians in Livonia affected the complex and intricate pan-European politics, upsetting the balance of power on the continent. So, for example, the Polish king Sigismund II Augustus wrote to the English Queen Elizabeth I about the importance of the Russians in Livonia: “ The Moscow sovereign daily increases his power by acquiring goods that are brought to Narva, because here, among other things, weapons are brought here that are still unknown to him ... military experts come, through which he acquires the means to defeat everyone ...».
The truce was also driven by disagreements over foreign strategy within the Russian leadership itself. There, in addition to supporters of access to the Baltic Sea, there were those who advocated the continuation of the struggle in the south, against the Crimean Khanate. In fact, the main initiator of the truce of 1559 was the roundabout Alexei Adashev. This grouping reflected the mood of those circles of the nobility who, in addition to eliminating the threat from the steppes, wanted to receive a large additional land fund in the steppe zone. During this truce, the Russians struck at the Crimean Khanate, which, however, did not have significant consequences. More global consequences had a truce with Livonia.
Truce of 1559
Already in the first year of the war, in addition to Narva, Yuryev (July 18), Neishloss, Neuhaus were occupied, the troops of the Livonian Confederation were defeated near Tirzen near Riga, Russian troops reached Kolyvan. The raids of the Crimean Tatar hordes on the southern borders of Russia, which happened already in January 1558, could not tie down the initiative of the Russian troops in the Baltic.
However, in March 1559, under the influence of Denmark and representatives of the major boyars, who prevented the expansion of the scope of the military conflict, a truce was concluded with the Livonian Confederation, which lasted until November. Historian R. G. Skrynnikov emphasizes that the Russian government, represented by Adashev and Viskovaty, “should have concluded a truce on the western borders,” as it was preparing for a “decisive clash on the southern border.”
During the armistice (August 31), the Livonian Landsmeister of the Teutonic Order, Gotthard Ketler, concluded an agreement in Vilna with the Lithuanian Grand Duke Sigismund II, according to which the lands of the order and the possessions of the Archbishop of Riga were transferred under “clientella and patronage”, that is, under the protectorate of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. In the same year, 1559, Reval ceded to Sweden, and the Bishop of Ezel ceded the island of Ezel (Saaremaa) to Duke Magnus, brother of the Danish king, for 30 thousand thalers.
Taking advantage of the delay, the Livonian Confederation gathered reinforcements, and a month before the end of the truce in the vicinity of Yuryev, its detachments attacked the Russian troops. Russian governors lost more than 1000 people killed.
In 1560, the Russians resumed hostilities and won a number of victories: Marienburg (now Aluksne in Latvia) was taken; German forces were defeated at Ermes, after which Fellin (now Viljandi in Estonia) was taken. The Livonian Confederation collapsed.
During the capture of Fellin, the former Livonian Landmaster of the Teutonic Order, Wilhelm von Furstenberg, was captured. In 1575, he sent a letter to his brother from Yaroslavl, where the land was granted to the former Landmaster. He told a relative that he "had no reason to complain about his fate."
Sweden and Lithuania, which acquired the Livonian lands, demanded that Moscow remove troops from their territory. Ivan the Terrible refused and Russia found itself in conflict with the coalition of Lithuania and Sweden.
War with the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
On November 26, 1561, the German emperor Ferdinand I banned the supply of Russians through the port of Narva. Eric XIV, King of Sweden, blocked the port of Narva and sent Swedish privateers to intercept merchant ships sailing to Narva.
In 1562, Lithuanian troops raided the Smolensk region and Velizh. In the summer of that year, the situation on the southern borders of the Muscovite state escalated, which moved the timing of the Russian offensive in Livonia to autumn.
The way to the Lithuanian capital Vilna was closed by Polotsk. In January 1563, the Russian army, which included "almost all the armed forces of the country," set out to capture this border fortress from Velikie Luki. In early February, the Russian army began the siege of Polotsk, and on February 15 the city surrendered.
According to the Pskov Chronicle, during the capture of Polotsk, Ivan the Terrible ordered all Jews to be baptized on the spot, and those who refused (300 people) ordered to be drowned in the Dvina. Karamzin mentions that after the capture of Polotsk, John ordered "to baptize all the Jews, and drown the disobedient in the Dvina."
After the capture of Polotsk, Russia's successes in the Livonian War began to decline. Already in 1564, the Russians suffered a series of defeats (Battle of Chashniki). The boyar and a major military leader, who actually commanded the Russian troops in the West, Prince A.M. Kurbsky, went over to the side of Lithuania, he gave the king agents in the Baltic states and participated in the Lithuanian raid on Velikiye Luki.
Tsar Ivan the Terrible responded to the military failures and unwillingness of eminent boyars to fight against Lithuania with repressions against the boyars. In 1565, the oprichnina was introduced. In 1566, a Lithuanian embassy arrived in Moscow, proposing to divide Livonia on the basis of the situation that existed at that time. The Zemsky Sobor, convened at that time, supported the intention of the government of Ivan the Terrible to fight in the Baltic states until the capture of Riga.
Third period of the war
The Union of Lublin had serious consequences, uniting the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in 1569 into one state - the Republic of Both Nations. A difficult situation developed in the north of Russia, where relations with Sweden again aggravated, and in the south (the campaign of the Turkish army near Astrakhan in 1569 and the war with the Crimea, during which the army of Devlet I Giray burned Moscow in 1571 and devastated the southern Russian lands). However, the offensive in the Republic of Both Nations of a long “kinglessness”, the creation in Livonia of the vassal “kingdom” of Magnus, which at first had an attractive force in the eyes of the population of Livonia, again allowed the scales to tip in favor of Russia. In 1572, the army of Devlet Giray was destroyed and the threat of large raids by the Crimean Tatars was eliminated (Battle of Molodi). In 1573 the Russians stormed the Weissenstein (Paide) fortress. In the spring, Moscow troops under the command of Prince Mstislavsky (16,000) met near Lode Castle in western Estonia with a Swedish army of two thousand. Despite the overwhelming numerical advantage, the Russian troops suffered a crushing defeat. They had to leave all their guns, banners and baggage.
In 1575, the fortress of Sage surrendered to the army of Magnus, and Pernov (now Pärnu in Estonia) surrendered to the Russians. After the campaign of 1576, Russia captured the entire coast, except for Riga and Kolyvan.
However, the unfavorable international situation, the distribution of land in the Baltic states to Russian nobles, which alienated the local peasant population from Russia, serious internal difficulties (the economic ruin that was looming over the country) negatively affected the further course of the war for Russia.
Fourth period of the war
Stefan Batory, who, with the active support of the Turks (1576), took the throne of the Republic of the Crown of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, went on the offensive, occupied Wenden (1578), Polotsk (1579), Sokol, Velizh, Usvyat, Velikiye Luki. In the captured fortresses, the Poles and Lithuanians completely destroyed the Russian garrisons. In Velikiye Luki, the Poles exterminated the entire population, about 7 thousand people. Polish and Lithuanian detachments ravaged the Smolensk region, Seversk land, Ryazan region, south-west of the Novgorod region, plundered Russian lands up to the headwaters of the Volga. The devastation they caused was reminiscent of the worst Tatar raids. The Lithuanian voivode Filon Kmita from Orsha burned 2000 villages in the western Russian lands and captured a huge full. The Lithuanian magnates Ostrozhsky and Vishnevetsky, with the help of light cavalry detachments, plundered the Chernihiv region. The cavalry of the gentry Jan Solomeretsky ravaged the environs of Yaroslavl. In February 1581, the Lithuanians burned Staraya Russa.
In 1581, the Polish-Lithuanian army, which included mercenaries from almost all of Europe, besieged Pskov, intending, if successful, to go to Novgorod the Great and Moscow. In November 1580, the Swedes took Korela, where 2 thousand Russians were exterminated, and in 1581 they occupied Rugodiv (Narva), which was also accompanied by a massacre - 7 thousand Russians died; the victors did not take prisoners and did not spare the civilian population. The heroic defense of Pskov in 1581-1582 by the garrison and the population of the city determined a more favorable outcome of the war for Russia: the failure near Pskov forced Stefan Batory to enter into peace negotiations.
Results and consequences
In January 1582, in Yama-Zapolny (near Pskov), a 10-year truce was concluded with the Republic of Both Nations (the Commonwealth) (the so-called Yam-Zapolsky peace). Russia abandoned Livonia and Belarusian lands, but some border lands were returned to it.
In May 1583, a 3-year Plyussky truce with Sweden was concluded, according to which Koporye, Yam, Ivangorod and the territory adjacent to them on the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland were ceded. The Russian state was again cut off from the sea. The country was devastated, and the northwestern regions were depopulated.
It should also be noted that the Crimean raids influenced the course of the war and its results: only for 3 years out of 25 years of the war there were no significant raids.
Formal reasons were found to start the war (see below), but the true reasons were the geopolitical need for Russia to gain access to the Baltic Sea, as the most convenient for direct ties with the centers of European civilizations, as well as the desire to take an active part in the division of the territory of the Livonian an order, the progressive disintegration of which was becoming obvious, but which, not wanting the strengthening of Russia, prevented its external contacts. For example, the authorities of Livonia did not allow more than a hundred specialists from Europe, invited by Ivan IV, to pass through their lands. Some of them were imprisoned and executed.
The presence of such a hostile barrier did not suit Moscow, which was striving to break out of continental isolation. However, Russia owned a small segment of the Baltic coast, from the Neva basin to Ivangorod. But it was strategically vulnerable, and there were no ports or developed infrastructure. So Ivan the Terrible hoped to use the transport system of Livonia. He considered it an ancient Russian fiefdom, illegally seized by the crusaders.
The forceful solution of the problem predetermined the defiant behavior of the Livonians themselves, who, even according to their own historians, acted imprudently. The reason for the aggravation of relations was the mass pogroms of Orthodox churches in Livonia. Outraged, Grozny sent a message to the authorities of the Order, in which he stated that he would not tolerate such actions. A whip was attached to the letter, as a symbol of imminent punishment. By that time, the truce between Moscow and Livonia had expired (concluded in 1504 as a result of the Russian-Lithuanian war of 1500-1503). To extend it, the Russian side demanded the payment of the Yuryev tribute, which the Livonians pledged to pay back to Ivan III, but for 50 years they never collected it. Recognizing the need to pay it, they again failed to fulfill their obligations. Then in 1558 Russian troops entered Livonia. Thus began the Livonian War. It lasted a quarter of a century, becoming the longest and one of the most difficult in the history of Russia.
Livonian War (1558-1583)
The Livonian War can be roughly divided into four stages. The first one (1558-1561) is directly related to the Russian-Livonian war. The second (1562-1569) included primarily the Russo-Lithuanian war. The third (1570-1576) was distinguished by the resumption of the Russian struggle for Livonia, where they, together with the Danish prince Magnus, fought against the Swedes. The fourth (1577-1583) is associated primarily with the Russian-Polish war. During this period, the Russo-Swedish war continued.
In the middle of the XVI century. Livonia was not a significant military force capable of seriously resisting the Russian state. Its main military asset remained powerful stone fortresses. But formidable for arrows and stones, knightly castles were by that time no longer very capable of protecting their inhabitants from the power of heavy siege weapons. Therefore, military operations in Livonia were reduced mainly to the fight against fortresses, in which the Russian artillery, which had already shown itself in the Kazan case, distinguished itself. The first fortress to fall from the onslaught of the Russians was Narva.
Capture of Narva (1558).
In April 1558, Russian troops led by governors Adashev, Basmanov and Buturlin laid siege to Narva. The fortress was defended by a garrison under the command of the knight Focht Schnellenberg. The decisive assault on Narva took place on 11 May. On this day, a fire broke out in the city, which was accompanied by a storm. According to legend, it arose due to the fact that drunken Livonians threw an Orthodox icon of the Virgin into the fire. Taking advantage of the fact that the guards left the fortifications, the Russians rushed to the assault. They broke through the gates and took possession of the lower city. Having seized the guns located there, the attackers opened fire on the upper castle, preparing the stairs for the attack. But it did not follow, because by the evening the defenders of the castle surrendered, pronouncing the condition of a free exit from the city.
It was the first major fortress taken by the Russians in the Livonian War. Narva was a convenient sea harbor through which direct relations between Russia and Western Europe began. At the same time, the creation of our own fleet was going on. A shipyard is being built in Narva. The first Russian ships were built on it by craftsmen from Kholmogory and Vologda, whom the tsar sent abroad "to supervise how guns are poured and ships are built in the west." A flotilla of 17 ships was based in Narva under the command of the Dane Karsten Rode, who was taken into Russian service.
Capture of Neuhaus (1558). The defense of the Neuhaus fortress, which was defended by several hundred soldiers led by the knight Fon-Padenorm, was distinguished by particular persistence in the campaign of 1558. Despite their small numbers, they staunchly resisted for almost a month, repelling the onslaught of the troops of the voivode Peter Shuisky. After the destruction of the fortress walls and towers by Russian artillery, on June 30, 1558, the Germans withdrew to the upper castle. Von Padenorm wanted to defend himself here to the last extremity, but his surviving associates refused to continue the senseless resistance. As a sign of respect for the courage of the besieged, Shuisky allowed them to leave with honor.
Capture of Dorpat (1558). In July, Shuisky laid siege to Derpt (until 1224 - Yuryev, now the Estonian city of Tartu). The city was defended by a garrison under the command of Bishop Weiland (2 thousand people). And here, first of all, the Russian artillery distinguished itself. On July 11, she began shelling the city. Some towers and loopholes were destroyed by the cannonballs. During the shelling, the Russians brought part of the guns almost to the very fortress wall, opposite the German and St. Andrew's Gates, and opened fire at close range. The shelling of the city lasted 7 days. When the main fortifications were destroyed, the besieged, having lost hope of outside help, entered into negotiations with the Russians. Shuisky promised not to destroy the city and to preserve its former administration for its inhabitants. July 18, 1558 Dorpat capitulated. Order in the city was indeed maintained, and its violators were subjected to severe punishments.
Defense of Ringen (1558). After the capture of a number of cities in Livonia, the Russian troops, leaving garrisons there, left in the autumn for winter quarters within their borders. This was taken advantage of by the new Livonian master Ketler, who gathered a 10,000-strong army and tried to return what was lost. At the end of 1558, he approached the fortress of Ringen, which was defended by a garrison of several hundred archers, led by the governor Rusin-Ignatiev. The Russians bravely held out for five weeks, repulsing two attacks. The detachment of governor Repnin (2 thousand people) tried to help the besieged, but he was defeated by Ketler. This failure did not dampen the spirit of the besieged, who continued to resist. The Germans were able to take the fortress by storm only after its defenders ran out of gunpowder. All the defenders of Ringen were destroyed. Having lost a fifth of his army near Ringen (2 thousand people) and spending more than a month on the siege, Ketler was unable to build on his success. At the end of October, his army retreated to Riga. This small victory turned into a major disaster for the Livonians. In response to their actions, the army of Tsar Ivan the Terrible entered Livonia two months later.
Battle of Tiersen (1559). In the area of this city in Livonia on January 17, 1559, a battle took place between the army of the Livonian Order under the command of the knight Felkenzam and the Russian army, led by the governor Serebryany. The Germans were completely defeated. Felkenzam and 400 knights died in battle, the rest were captured or fled. After this victory, the Russian army freely made a winter raid on the lands of the Order to Riga itself and returned to Russia in February.
Truce (1559). In the spring hostilities did not resume. In May, Russia concluded a truce with the Livonian Order until November 1559. This was largely due to the presence of serious disagreements in the Moscow government over foreign strategy. Thus, the closest advisers to the tsar, headed by the devious Alexei Adashev, were against the war in the Baltic states and advocated the continuation of the struggle in the south, against the Crimean Khanate. This grouping reflected the mood of those circles of the nobility who wished, on the one hand, to eliminate the threat of attacks from the steppes, and on the other, to receive a large additional land fund in the steppe zone.
The truce of 1559 allowed the Order to gain time and carry out active diplomatic work in order to involve its closest neighbors - Poland and Sweden - in the conflict against Moscow. With his invasion of Livonia, Ivan IV affected the trade interests of the main states that had access to the Baltic region (Lithuania, Poland, Sweden and Denmark). At that time, trade on the Baltic Sea was growing from year to year, and the question of who would control it was very relevant. But not only the problems of their own commercial gain were of interest to Russia's neighbors. They were worried about the strengthening of Russia by getting Livonia. Here is what, for example, the Polish king Sigismund-August wrote to the English Queen Elizabeth about the role of Livonia for the Russians: “The Moscow sovereign daily increases his power by acquiring items that are brought to Narva; for not only goods, but also weapons are brought here, until now unknown to him... the artists (specialists) themselves come, through whom he acquires the means to defeat everyone... Until now, we could defeat him only because he was a stranger to education. But if Narva navigation continues, then what will happen to him unknown?" Thus, the struggle of the Russians for Livonia received a wide international response. The clash in the small Baltic patch of interests of so many states predetermined the severity of the Livonian War, in which military operations were closely intertwined with complex and intricate foreign policy situations.
Defense of Dorpat and Lais (1559).
The master of the Livonian Order, Ketler, actively used the respite given to him. Having received help from Germany and made an alliance with the Polish king, the master broke the truce and went on the offensive in early autumn. He managed to defeat the detachment of governor Pleshcheev near Dorpat with an unexpected attack. In this battle, 1 thousand Russians fell. Nevertheless, the head of the Derpt garrison, governor Katyrev-Rostovsky, managed to take measures to defend the city. When Ketler laid siege to Derpt, the Russians met his army with gunfire and a brave sortie. For 10 days, the Livonians tried to destroy the walls with cannon fire, but to no avail. Not daring for a long winter siege or attack, Ketler was forced to retreat.
On the way back, Ketler decided to capture the fortress of Lais, where there was a small Russian garrison under the command of the head of the archery Koshkarov (400 people). In November 1559, the Livonians set up tours, broke the wall, but could not break into the fortress, stopped by the fierce resistance of the archers. The brave garrison of Lais steadfastly fought off the attacks of the Livonian army for two days. Ketler never managed to overcome the defenders of Lais, and he was forced to retreat to Wenden. The unsuccessful siege of Dorpat and Lais meant the failure of the autumn offensive of the Livonians. On the other hand, their treacherous attack forced Ivan the Terrible to resume hostilities against the Order.
Battles of Wittenstein and Ermes (1560). The decisive battles between Russian and Livonian troops took place in the summer of 1560 near Wittenstein and Ermes. In the first of them, the army of Prince Kurbsky (5 thousand people) defeated the German detachment of the former Master of the Order of Firstenberg. Under Ermes, the cavalry of the governor Barbashin (12 thousand people) completely destroyed a detachment of German knights led by Landmarshal Bel (about 1 thousand people), who tried to suddenly attack the Russian horsemen resting on the edge of the forest. 120 knights and 11 commanders surrendered, including their leader Bel. The victory at Ermes opened the way for the Russians to Fellin.
The Capture of Fellin (1560). In August 1560, a 60,000-strong army led by governors Mstislavsky and Shuisky laid siege to Fellin (known since 1211, now the city of Viljandi in Estonia). This most powerful fortress in the eastern part of Livonia was defended by a garrison under the command of the former Master Firstenberg. The success of the Russians near Fellin was ensured by the effective actions of their artillery, which for three weeks fired continuously at the fortifications. During the siege, the Livonian troops tried to help the besieged garrison from outside, but were defeated. After artillery fire destroyed part of the outer wall and set fire to the city, Fellin's defenders entered into negotiations. But Firstenberg did not want to give up and tried to force them to defend themselves in an impregnable castle inside the fortress. The garrison, not receiving a salary for several months, refused to comply with the order. On August 21, the fellines capitulated.
Having handed over the city to the Russians, its ordinary defenders received a free exit. Important prisoners (including Firstenberg) were sent to Moscow. The released soldiers of the Fellin garrison reached Riga, where they were hanged by Master Ketler for treason. The fall of Fellin actually decided the fate of the Livonian Order. Desperate to defend himself against the Russians on his own, Ketler in 1561 transferred his lands to the Polish-Lithuanian possession. The northern regions with the center in Reval (before 1219 - Kolyvan, now - Tallinn) recognized themselves as subjects of Sweden. According to the Treaty of Vilna (November 1561), the Livonian Order ceased to exist, its territory was transferred to the joint possession of Lithuania and Poland, the last master of the order received the Duchy of Courland. Denmark, which occupied the islands of Khiuma and Saaremaa, also declared its claims to part of the order's lands. As a result, the Russians in Livonia faced a coalition of states that did not want to give up their new possessions. Having not yet managed to capture a significant part of Livonia, including its main ports (Riga and Revel), Ivan IV found himself in an unfavorable situation. But he continued the fight, hoping to separate his opponents.
Second stage (1562-1569)
The most implacable opponent of Ivan IV was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. She was not satisfied with the capture of Livonia by the Russians, since in this case they received control over the export of grain (through Riga) from the Principality of Lithuania to European countries. Lithuania and Poland feared even more the military strengthening of Russia by receiving strategic goods from Europe through Livonian ports. The intransigence of the parties on the issue of the division of Livonia was also facilitated by their long-standing territorial claims to each other. The Polish-Lithuanian side also tried to seize northern Estonia in order to control all the Baltic trade routes leading to Russia. With such a policy, a clash was inevitable. By claiming Revel, Lithuania spoiled relations with Sweden. This was taken advantage of by Ivan IV, who concluded peace agreements with Sweden and Denmark. Having thus ensured the safety of the port of Narva, the Russian tsar decided to defeat his main competitor, the Principality of Lithuania.
In 1561-1562. hostilities between Lithuanians and Russians took place in Livonia. In 1561, Hetman Radziwill recaptured the Travast fortress from the Russians. But after the defeat near Pernau (Pernava, Pernov, now Pärnu), he was forced to leave it. The next year passed in petty skirmishes and fruitless negotiations. In 1563 Grozny himself took over the task and led the army. The goal of his campaign was Polotsk. The theater of operations moved to the territory of the Lithuanian principality. The conflict with Lithuania significantly expanded the scope and goals of the war for Russia. The long-standing struggle for the return of ancient Russian lands was added to the battle for Livonia.
Capture of Polotsk (1563). In January 1563, the army of Ivan the Terrible (up to 130 thousand people) set out for Polotsk. The choice of the purpose of the campaign was not accidental for a number of reasons. Firstly, Polotsk was a rich trading center, the capture of which promised great booty. Secondly, it was the most important strategic point on the Western Dvina, which had a direct connection with Riga. He also opened the road to Vilna and defended Livonia from the south. The political aspect was no less important. Polotsk was one of the princely centers of Ancient Russia, the lands of which were claimed by the Moscow sovereigns. There were also religious considerations. Large Jewish and Protestant communities settled in Polotsk, which was located near the Russian borders. The spread of their influence within Russia seemed highly undesirable for the Russian clergy.
The siege of Polotsk began on January 31, 1563. The decisive role in its capture was played by the power of Russian artillery. The volleys of two hundred of its guns were so strong that the cannonballs, flying over the fortress wall on one side, hit from the inside on the opposite side. Cannon shots destroyed a fifth of the fortress walls. According to eyewitnesses, there was such a cannon thunder that it seemed as if "the sky and the whole earth fell on the city." Having taken the settlement, the Russian troops laid siege to the castle. After the destruction of part of its walls by artillery fire, the defenders of the fortress surrendered on February 15, 1563. The wealth of the Polotsk treasury and the arsenal were sent to Moscow, and the centers of other faiths were destroyed.
The capture of Polotsk was the biggest political and strategic success of Tsar Ivan the Terrible. "If Ivan IV had died ... at the moment of his greatest successes on the Western Front, his preparations for the final conquest of Livonia, historical memory would have given him the name of the great conqueror, the creator of the world's largest power, like Alexander the Great," wrote historian R. Whipper. However, after Polotsk, a series of military failures followed.
Battle of the Ulla River (1564). After unsuccessful negotiations with the Lithuanians, the Russians launched a new offensive in January 1564. The army of governor Peter Shuisky (20 thousand people) moved from Polotsk to Orsha to join up with the army of Prince Serebryany, which was coming from Vyazma. Shuisky did not take any precautions during the campaign. No reconnaissance was conducted, people walked in discordant crowds without weapons and armor, which were carried on sledges. Nobody thought about the attack of the Lithuanians. Meanwhile, the Lithuanian governors Trotsky and Radziwill received accurate information about the Russian army through scouts. The governors lay in wait for him in a wooded area near the Ulla River (not far from Chashnikov) and unexpectedly attacked on January 26, 1564 with relatively small forces (4 thousand people). Not having time to take battle order and properly arm themselves, Shuisky's soldiers succumbed to panic and began to flee, leaving their entire convoy (5 thousand carts). Shuisky paid for his carelessness with his own life. The famous conqueror of Dorpat died in the beating that began. Upon learning of the defeat of Shuisky's troops, Serebryany retreated from Orsha to Smolensk. Shortly after the defeat at Ulla (in April 1564), a major Russian military leader, a close friend of the young years of Ivan the Terrible, Prince Andrei Mikhailovich Kurbsky, fled from Yuryev to the side of Lithuania.
Battle of the Lakes (1564).
The next failure of the Russians was the battle near the town of Ozerishche (now Ezerishche), 60 km north of Vitebsk. Here, on July 22, 1564, the Lithuanian army of voivode Pac (12 thousand people) defeated the army of voivode Tokmakov (13 thousand people).
In the summer of 1564, the Russians set out from Nevel and laid siege to the Lithuanian fortress Ozerishche. An army under the command of Pac moved from Vitebsk to help the besieged. Tokmakov, hoping to easily deal with the Lithuanians, met them with only one of his cavalry. The Russians crushed the advanced Lithuanian squad, but could not withstand the blow of the main army approaching the battlefield and retreated in disorder, losing (according to Lithuanian data) 5 thousand people. After the defeat at Ulla and near Ozerishchi, Moscow's onslaught on Lithuania was suspended for almost a hundred years.
Military failures contributed to the transition of Ivan the Terrible to a policy of repression against part of the feudal nobility, some of whose representatives at that time embarked on the path of conspiracies and outright treason. Peace talks with Lithuania also resumed. She agreed to cede part of the land (including Derpt and Polotsk). But Russia did not get access to the sea, which was the goal of the war. To discuss such an important issue, Ivan IV did not limit himself to the opinion of the boyars, but convened the Zemsky Sobor (1566). He firmly spoke in favor of continuing the campaign. In 1568, the Lithuanian army of Hetman Khodkevich launched an offensive, but its onslaught was stopped by the staunch resistance of the garrison of the Ulla fortress (on the Ulla River).
Unable to cope with Moscow alone, Lithuania concluded the Union of Lublin with Poland (1569). According to it, both countries were united into a single state - the Commonwealth. This was one of the most important and very negative results of the Livonian War for Russia, which had an impact on the future fate of Eastern Europe. With the formal equality of both sides, the leading role in this association belonged to Poland. Having left behind Lithuania, Warsaw is now becoming Moscow's main rival in the west, and the final (4th) stage of the Livonian War can be considered the first Russian-Polish war.
Third stage (1570-1576)
Combining the potentials of Lithuania and Poland sharply reduced Grozny's chances of success in this war. At that time, the situation on the southern borders of the country became seriously aggravated. In 1569, the Turkish army made a campaign against Astrakhan, trying to cut off Russia from the Caspian Sea and open the gates for expansion in the Volga region. Although the campaign ended in failure due to poor preparation, the Crimean-Turkish military activity in the region did not decrease (see Russo-Crimean wars). Relations with Sweden also worsened. In 1568, King Eric XIV was overthrown there, and he developed friendly relations with Ivan the Terrible. The new Swedish government went to the aggravation of relations with Russia. Sweden established a naval blockade of the port of Narva, which made it difficult for Russia to purchase strategic goods. Having completed the war with Denmark in 1570, the Swedes began to strengthen their positions in Livonia.
The deterioration of the foreign policy situation coincided with the growth of tension within Russia. At that time, Ivan IV received news of a conspiracy of the Novgorod leaders, who were going to surrender Novgorod and Pskov to Lithuania. Worried about the news of separatism in a region located near military operations, the tsar in early 1570 set out on a campaign against Novgorod and committed a cruel massacre there. People loyal to the authorities were sent to Pskov and Novgorod. A wide range of people were involved in the inquiry in the "Novgorod case": representatives of the boyars, the clergy, and even prominent guardsmen. In the summer of 1570, executions took place in Moscow.
In the context of the aggravation of the external and internal situation, Ivan IV undertakes a new diplomatic move. He agrees to a truce with the Commonwealth and begins a fight with the Swedes, trying to force them out of Livonia. The ease with which Warsaw agreed to a temporary reconciliation with Moscow was explained by the internal political situation in Poland. The elderly and childless King Sigismund-August lived out his last days there. Expecting his imminent death and the election of a new king, the Poles tried not to aggravate relations with Russia. Moreover, Ivan the Terrible himself was considered in Warsaw one of the likely candidates for the Polish throne.
Having concluded a truce with Lithuania and Poland, the king opposes Sweden. In an effort to enlist the neutrality of Denmark and the support of part of the Livonian nobility, Ivan decides to create a vassal kingdom on the lands of Livonia occupied by Moscow. The brother of the Danish king, Prince Magnus, becomes its ruler. Having created the kingdom of Livonia, dependent on Moscow, Ivan the Terrible and Magnus begin a new stage in the struggle for Livonia. This time the theater of operations is moving to the Swedish part of Estonia.
First siege of Revel (1570-1571).
The main goal of Ivan IV in this area was the largest Baltic port of Revel (Tallinn). On August 23, 1570, Russian-German troops led by Magnus (over 25 thousand people) approached the Reval fortress. The call to surrender was refused by the townspeople who accepted Swedish citizenship. The siege began. The Russians built wooden towers opposite the fortress gates, from which they fired at the city. However, this time he was not successful. The besieged not only defended themselves, but also made bold sorties, destroying the siege structures. The number of besiegers was clearly insufficient to take such a large city with powerful fortifications.
However, the Russian governors (Yakovlev, Lykov, Kropotkin) decided not to lift the siege. They hoped to succeed in the winter, when the sea would be frozen over and the Swedish fleet would be unable to supply reinforcements to the city. Not taking active actions against the fortress, the allied troops were engaged in the devastation of the surrounding villages, restoring the local population against them. Meanwhile, the Swedish fleet managed to deliver a lot of food and weapons to the Revalians before the cold weather, and they endured the siege without much need. On the other hand, murmuring increased among the besiegers, who did not want to endure the difficult conditions of winter standing. After standing at Revel for 30 weeks, the allies were forced to retreat.
Capture of Wittenstein (1572). After that, Ivan the Terrible changes tactics. Leaving Revel alone for the time being, he decides to first completely oust the Swedes from Estonia in order to finally cut off this port from the mainland. At the end of 1572, the tsar himself led the campaign. At the head of an 80,000-strong army, he besieges the stronghold of the Swedes in central Estonia - the Wittenstein fortress (the modern city of Paide). After a powerful shelling, the city was taken by a fierce attack, during which the tsar's favorite, the famous guardsman Malyuta Skuratov, died. According to the Livonian chronicles, the tsar, in a rage, ordered the captured Germans and Swedes to be burned. After the capture of Wittenstein, Ivan IV returned to Novgorod.
Battle of Lod (1573). But hostilities continued, and in the spring of 1573, Russian troops under the command of the voivode Mstislavsky (16 thousand people) converged in an open field, near Lode Castle (Western Estonia), with the Swedish detachment of General Klaus Tott (2 thousand people). Despite a significant numerical superiority (according to the Livonian chronicles), the Russians could not successfully resist the martial art of the Swedish warriors and suffered a crushing defeat. The news of the failure at Lod, which coincided with the uprising in the Kazan region, forced Tsar Ivan the Terrible to temporarily stop hostilities in Livonia and enter into peace negotiations with the Swedes.
Fighting in Estonia (1575-1577). In 1575 a partial truce was concluded with the Swedes. It assumed that until 1577 the theater of military operations between Russia and Sweden would be limited to the Baltic states and not spread to other areas (primarily Karelia). Thus, Grozny was able to concentrate all his efforts on the struggle for Estonia. In the campaign of 1575-1576. Russian troops, with the support of Magnus' supporters, managed to capture the whole of Western Estonia. The central event of this campaign was the capture by the Russians at the end of 1575 of the fortress of Pernov (Pärnu), where they lost 7 thousand people during the assault. (according to Livonian data). After the fall of Pernov, the rest of the fortresses surrendered almost without resistance. Thus, by the end of 1576, the Russians actually took over all of Estonia, with the exception of Reval. The population, weary of the long war, rejoiced at peace. It is interesting that after the voluntary surrender of the powerful Gabsal fortress, the locals staged dances that so impressed the Moscow nobles. According to a number of historians, the Russians were amazed at this and said: “What a strange people the Germans are! If we Russians surrendered such a city without need, we would not dare to raise our eyes on an honest person, and our tsar did not know what kind of execution to execute us And you Germans are celebrating your shame."
Second siege of Revel (1577). Having mastered all of Estonia, the Russians in January 1577 again approached Revel. The troops of the governor Mstislavsky and Sheremetev (50 thousand people) approached here. The city was defended by a garrison led by the Swedish general Gorn. This time, the Swedes prepared even more thoroughly for the defense of their main stronghold. Suffice it to say that the besieged had five times as many guns as the besiegers. For six weeks, the Russians bombarded Revel, hoping to set it on fire with red-hot cannonballs. However, the townspeople took successful measures against fires, creating a special team that monitors the flight and fall of shells. For their part, the Reval artillery responded with even more powerful fire, inflicting severe damage on the besiegers. One of the leaders of the Russian army, voivode Sheremetev, who promised the tsar to take Revel or die, also died from a cannonball. The Russians attacked the fortifications three times, but each time unsuccessfully. In response, the Reval garrison made bold and frequent sorties, preventing serious siege work from being carried out.
The active defense of the Revelians, as well as cold and illness, led to significant losses in the Russian army. On March 13, it was forced to lift the siege. Leaving, the Russians burned their camp, and then conveyed to the besieged that they were not saying goodbye for good, promising to return sooner or later. After the lifting of the siege, the Revel garrison and local residents raided the Russian garrisons in Estonia, which, however, was soon stopped by the approach of troops under the command of Ivan the Terrible. However, the king moved no longer to Reval, but to the Polish possessions in Livonia. There were reasons for that.
Fourth stage (1577-1583)
In 1572, the childless Polish king Sigismund-August died in Warsaw. With his death, the Jagiellonian dynasty ended in Poland. The election of a new king dragged on for four years. Anarchy and political anarchy in the Commonwealth temporarily made it easier for the Russians to fight for the Baltics. During this period, Moscow diplomacy was actively working to bring the Russian tsar to the Polish throne. The candidacy of Ivan the Terrible enjoyed a certain popularity among the petty gentry, who were interested in him as a ruler capable of putting an end to the dominance of the big aristocracy. In addition, the Lithuanian nobility hoped to weaken the Polish influence with the help of Ivan the Terrible. Many in Lithuania and Poland were impressed by rapprochement with Russia for joint defense against the expansion of Crimea and Turkey.
At the same time, Warsaw saw in the choice of Ivan the Terrible a convenient opportunity for the peaceful subjugation of the Russian state and the opening of its borders for Polish noble colonization. So, for example, it has already happened with the lands of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania under the terms of the Union of Lublin. In turn, Ivan IV sought the Polish throne, primarily for the peaceful annexation of Kyiv and Livonia to Russia, with which Warsaw categorically disagreed. The difficulties of combining such polar interests ultimately led to the failure of the Russian candidacy. In 1576, the Transylvanian prince Stefan Batory was elected to the Polish throne. This choice destroyed the hopes of Moscow diplomacy for a peaceful solution to the Livonian dispute. In parallel, the government of Ivan IV negotiated with the Austrian emperor Maximilian II, trying to get his support in terminating the Union of Lublin and separating Lithuania from Poland. But Maximilian refused to recognize Russia's rights to the Baltic states, and the negotiations ended in vain.
However, Batory did not meet with unanimous support in the country. Some regions, primarily Danzig, refused to recognize it unconditionally. Taking advantage of the turmoil that broke out on this basis, Ivan IV tried to annex southern Livonia before it was too late. In the summer of 1577, the troops of the Russian tsar and his ally Magnus, violating the truce with the Commonwealth, invaded the southeastern regions of Livonia controlled by Poland. The few Polish units of Hetman Khodkevich did not dare to join the battle and retreated beyond the Western Dvina. Encountering no strong resistance, the troops of Ivan the Terrible and Magnus captured the main fortresses in southeastern Livonia by autumn. Thus, all of Livonia north of the Western Dvina (with the exception of the regions of Riga and Revel) was under the control of the Russian tsar. The campaign of 1577 was the last major military success of Ivan the Terrible in the Livonian War.
The tsar's hopes for a long turmoil in Poland did not come true. Batory turned out to be an energetic and decisive ruler. He laid siege to Danzig and obtained an oath from the locals. Having suppressed the internal opposition, he was able to direct all his forces to the fight against Moscow. Having created a well-armed, professional army of mercenaries (Germans, Hungarians, French), he also concluded an alliance with Turkey and the Crimea. This time, Ivan IV was unable to separate his opponents and found himself alone in the face of strong hostile powers, whose borders stretched from the Don steppes to Karelia. In total, these countries surpassed Russia both in terms of population and military power. True, in the south the situation after the formidable 1571-1572. deflated somewhat. In 1577 Khan Devlet Giray, an implacable enemy of Moscow, died. His son was more peaceful. However, the peacefulness of the new Khan was partly due to the fact that his main patron - Turkey - was at that time busy with a bloody war with Iran.
In 1578, the governors of Bathory invaded southeastern Livonia and managed to recapture almost all of their last year's conquests from the Russians. This time, the Poles acted in concert with the Swedes, who almost simultaneously attacked Narva. With this turn of events, King Magnus betrayed Grozny and went over to the side of the Commonwealth. An attempt by Russian troops to organize a counteroffensive near Wenden ended in failure.
Battle of Wenden (1578).
In October, Russian troops under the command of governor Ivan Golitsyn, Vasily Tyumensky, Khvorostinin and others (18 thousand people) tried to recapture Venden (now the Latvian city of Cesis) taken by the Poles. But arguing about which of them is more important, they lost time. This allowed the Polish troops of Hetman Sapieha to connect with the Swedish detachment of General Boye and arrive in time to help the besieged. Golitsyn decided to retreat, but on October 21, 1578, the Poles and Swedes decisively attacked his army, which barely had time to line up. The Tatar cavalry was the first to waver. Unable to withstand the fire, she fled. After that, the Russian army retreated to their fortified camp and fired from there until dark. At night, Golitsyn fled to Dorpat with his close associates. Following rushed and the remnants of his army.
The honor of the Russian army was saved by artillerymen under the command of the okolnichi Vasily Fedorovich Vorontsov. They did not abandon their guns and remained on the battlefield, determined to fight to the end. The next day, the surviving heroes, who were joined by the detachments of governor Vasily Sitsky, Danilo Saltykov and Mikhail Tyufikin, who decided to support their comrades, entered the battle with the entire Polish-Swedish army. Having shot the ammunition and not wanting to surrender, the Russian gunners hanged themselves on their guns. According to the Livonian chronicles, the Russians lost 6022 people killed near Wenden.
The defeat at Wenden forced Ivan the Terrible to seek peace with Batory. Resuming peace negotiations with the Poles, the tsar decided in the summer of 1579 to strike at the Swedes and finally take Revel. For the march to Novgorod, troops and heavy siege artillery were drawn up. But Batory did not want peace and was preparing to continue the war. Determining the direction of the main attack, the Polish king rejected proposals to go to Livonia, where there were many fortresses and Russian troops (up to 100 thousand people). Fighting in such conditions could cost his army heavy losses. In addition, he believed that in Livonia, devastated by many years of war, he would not find enough food and booty for his mercenaries. He decided to strike where he was not expected and take possession of Polotsk. By this, the king provided a safe rear for his positions in southeastern Livonia and received an important springboard for a campaign against Russia.
Defense of Polotsk (1579).
In early August 1579, Batory's army (30-50 thousand people) appeared under the walls of Polotsk. Simultaneously with his campaign, Swedish troops invaded Karelia. For three weeks, Batory's troops tried to set fire to the fortress with artillery fire. But the defenders of the city, led by the governors Telyatevsky, Volynsky and Shcherbaty, successfully extinguished the fires that arose. This was also favored by the established rainy weather. Then the Polish king, with the promise of high rewards and booty, persuaded his Hungarian mercenaries to storm the fortress. On August 29, 1579, taking advantage of a clear and windy day, the Hungarian infantry rushed to the walls of Polotsk and managed to light them with the help of torches. Then the Hungarians, supported by the Poles, rushed through the flaming walls of the fortress. But its defenders have already managed to dig a moat in this place. When the attackers broke into the fortress, they were stopped at the moat by a volley of cannons. Having suffered heavy losses, Batory's soldiers retreated. But this failure did not stop the mercenaries. Enticed by the legends about the huge wealth stored in the fortress, the Hungarian soldiers, reinforced by the German infantry, again rushed to the attack. But this time the fierce assault was repulsed.
Meanwhile, Ivan the Terrible, interrupting the campaign against Revel, sent part of the search to repel the Swedish onslaught in Karelia. The tsar ordered the detachments under the command of the governor Shein, Lykov and Palitsky to rush to the aid of Polotsk. However, the governors did not dare to engage in battle with the Polish avant-garde sent against them and retreated to the area of \u200b\u200bthe Sokol fortress. Having lost faith in the help of their search, the besieged no longer hoped for the protection of their dilapidated fortifications. Part of the garrison, headed by the voivode Volynsky, entered into negotiations with the king, which ended with the surrender of Polotsk on the condition of a free exit for all military people. Other governors, together with Bishop Cyprian, locked themselves in the church of Hagia Sophia and were captured after stubborn resistance. Some of those who voluntarily surrendered went to the service of Batory. But the majority, despite the fear of reprisals from Ivan the Terrible, chose to return home to Russia (the tsar did not touch them and placed them in border garrisons). The capture of Polotsk brought about a turning point in the Livonian War. From now on, the strategic initiative passed to the Polish troops.
Defense of the Falcon (1579). Having taken Polotsk, Batory on September 19, 1579 laid siege to the Sokol fortress. The number of its defenders by that time had significantly decreased, since the detachments of the Don Cossacks, sent along with Shein to Polotsk, arbitrarily left for the Don. During a series of battles, Batory managed to defeat the manpower of the Moscow army and take the city. On September 25, after a heavy shelling by Polish artillery, the fortress was engulfed in fire. Her defenders, unable to stay in the flaming fortress, made a desperate sortie, but were repulsed and after a fierce fight they ran back to the fortress. A detachment of German mercenaries burst in behind them. But the defenders of the Falcon managed to slam the gate behind him. Lowering the iron bars, they cut off the German detachment from the main forces. Inside the fortress, in fire and smoke, a terrible slaughter began. At this time, the Poles and Lithuanians rushed to the aid of their comrades who were in the fortress. The attackers broke the gate and broke into the burning Falcon. In a ruthless battle, his garrison was almost completely exterminated. Only the voivode Sheremetev was captured with a small detachment. The governors Shein, Palitsky and Lykov died in a battle outside the city. According to the testimony of an old mercenary, Colonel Weyer, in none of the battles did he see such a number of corpses lying in such a limited space. They counted up to 4 thousand. The chronicle testifies to the terrible abuse of the dead. So, the German women cut out fat from dead bodies to make some kind of healing ointment. After the capture of Sokol, Bathory made a devastating raid on the Smolensk and Seversk regions, and then returned back, ending the campaign of 1579.
So, this time Ivan the Terrible had to expect strikes on a broad front. This forced him to stretch his forces, which had thinned over the years of the war, from Karelia to Smolensk. In addition, a large Russian group was in Livonia, where Russian nobles received land and started families. A lot of troops stood on the southern borders, waiting for the attack of the Crimeans. In a word, the Russians could not concentrate all their forces to repel the onslaught of Batory. The Polish king also had another serious advantage. We are talking about the quality of combat training of his soldiers. The main role in the army of Batory was played by professional infantry, which had a wealth of experience in European wars. She was trained in modern methods of combat with firearms, possessed the art of maneuver and interaction of all branches of the armed forces. Of great (sometimes decisive) importance was the fact that the army was personally led by King Batory - not only a skilled politician, but also a professional commander.
In the Russian army, the main role continued to be played by the horse and foot militia, which had a low degree of organization and discipline. In addition, the dense masses of cavalry, which formed the basis of the Russian army, were highly vulnerable to infantry and artillery fire. There were relatively few regular, well-trained units (archers, gunners) in the Russian army. Therefore, the total significant number did not at all speak of his strength. On the contrary, large masses of insufficiently disciplined and united people could more easily panic and flee from the battlefield. This was evidenced by the unsuccessful, in general, for the Russian field battles of this war (at Ulla, Ozerishchi, Lod, Wenden, etc.). It is no coincidence that the Moscow governors sought to avoid battles in the open field, especially with Batory.
The combination of these unfavorable factors, along with the growth of internal problems (the impoverishment of the peasantry, the agrarian crisis, financial difficulties, the fight against the opposition, etc.), predetermined Russia's failure in the Livonian War. The last weight thrown on the scales of the titanic confrontation was the military talent of King Batory, who turned the tide of the war and snatched the cherished fruit of his many years of efforts from the tenacious hands of the Russian Tsar.
Defense of Velikie Luki (1580).
The following year, Batory continued his attack on Russia in a northeasterly direction. By this, he sought to cut off the communication of the Russians with Livonia. Starting the campaign, the king had hopes for the dissatisfaction of part of society with the repressive policies of Ivan the Terrible. But the Russians did not respond to the king's calls to raise an uprising against their king. At the end of August 1580, Batory's army (50 thousand people) laid siege to Velikie Luki, which covered the path to Novgorod from the south. The city was defended by a garrison headed by the governor Voeikov (6-7 thousand people). 60 km east of Velikiye Luki, in Toropets, there was a large Russian army of governor Khilkov. But he did not dare to go to the aid of Veliky Luki and limited himself to individual sabotage, waiting for reinforcements.
Meanwhile, Bathory launched an attack on the fortress. The besieged responded with bold sorties, during one of which they captured the royal banner. Finally, the besiegers managed to set fire to the fortress with red-hot cannonballs. But even under these conditions, its defenders continued to fight valiantly, turning around to protect themselves from fire with wet skins. On September 5, the fire reached the fortress arsenal, where gunpowder was stored. Their explosion destroyed part of the walls, which made it possible for Batory's soldiers to break into the fortress. The fierce battle continued inside the fortress. In a ruthless massacre, almost all the defenders of Velikiye Luki fell, including the governor Voeikov.
Battle of Toropetsk (1580). Having mastered Velikiye Luki, the king sent a detachment of Prince Zbarazhsky against the voivode Khilkov, who stood inactive at Toropets. On October 1, 1580, the Poles attacked the Russian regiments and won. The defeat of Khilkov deprived the southern regions of the Novgorod lands from protection and allowed the Polish-Lithuanian detachments to continue military operations in this area in the winter. In February 1581 they raided Lake Ilmen. During the raid, the city of Kholm was captured and Staraya Russa was burned. In addition, the fortresses of Nevel, Ozerische and Zavolochye were taken. Thus, the Russians were not only completely ousted from the possessions of the Commonwealth, but also lost significant territories on their western borders. These successes ended the Batory campaign of 1580.
Battle of Nastasino (1580). When Batory took Velikiye Luki, a 9,000-strong Polish-Lithuanian detachment of the local military leader Philon, who had already declared himself governor of Smolensk, set out from Orsha from Orsha. Having passed through the Smolensk regions, he planned to connect with Batory at Velikie Luki. In October 1580, Philon's detachment was met and attacked near the village of Nastasino (7 km from Smolensk) by the Russian regiments of the voivode Buturlin. Under their onslaught, the Polish-Lithuanian army retreated to the wagon train. During the night, Philo abandoned his fortifications and began to withdraw. Acting energetically and persistently, Buturlin organized the persecution. Having overtaken Philon's units 40 versts from Smolensk, on Spassky Lugah, the Russians again decisively attacked the Polish-Lithuanian army and inflicted a complete defeat on it. 10 guns and 370 prisoners were captured. According to the chronicle, Philo himself "barely walked into the forest." This single major Russian victory in the 1580 campaign protected Smolensk from a Polish-Lithuanian attack.
Defense of Padis (1580). Meanwhile, the Swedes resumed the onslaught in Estonia. In October - December 1580, the Swedish army laid siege to Padis (now the Estonian city of Paldiski). The fortress was defended by a small Russian garrison led by the governor Danila Chikharev. Deciding to defend himself to the last extreme, Chikharev ordered the death of a Swedish truce envoy who had come with an offer to surrender. Lacking food supplies, the defenders of Padis suffered a terrible famine. They ate all the dogs, cats, and at the end of the siege they ate straw and skins. Nevertheless, the Russian garrison staunchly held back the onslaught of the Swedish troops for 13 weeks. Only after the third month of the siege did the Swedes manage to storm the fortress, which was defended by half-dead ghosts. After the fall of Padis, its defenders were exterminated. The capture of Padis by the Swedes put an end to the Russian presence in the western part of Estonia.
Pskov defense (1581).
In 1581, having hardly obtained the consent of the Sejm for a new campaign, Batory moved to Pskov. Through this largest city was the main connection between Moscow and the Livonian lands. By taking Pskov, the king planned to finally cut off the Russians from Livonia and end the war victoriously. On August 18, 1581, the army of Bathory (from 50 to 100 thousand people according to various sources) approached Pskov. The fortress was defended by up to 30,000 archers and armed townspeople under the command of governor Vasily and Ivan Shuisky.
The general attack began on 8 September. The attackers managed to break through the fortress wall with gun fire and capture the Svina and Pokrovskaya towers. But the defenders of the city, led by the brave governor Ivan Shuisky, blew up the Pig Tower occupied by the Poles, and then knocked them out from all positions and closed the breach. In the battle near the gap, courageous Pskovite women came to the aid of the men, who brought water and ammunition to their soldiers, and at a critical moment they themselves rushed into hand-to-hand combat. Having lost 5 thousand people, Batory's army retreated. The losses of the besieged amounted to 2.5 thousand people.
Then the king sent a message to the besieged with the words: "Surrender peacefully: you will receive honor and mercy, which you do not deserve from the Moscow tyrant, and the people will receive a benefit unknown in Russia ... In case of insane stubbornness, death to you and the people!" The answer of the Pskovites has been preserved, conveying through the centuries the appearance of the Russians of that era.
"Let your Majesty, the proud ruler of Lithuania, King Stephen, know that in Pskov even five years old a Christian child will laugh at your madness... us your holy Christian faith and submit to your mold? And what gain of honor is there in leaving us your sovereign and submitting to an infidel foreigner and becoming like the Jews? .. Or do you think to seduce us with crafty caress or empty flattery or vain wealth? But also the whole world of treasures we do not want for our kiss on the cross, by which we swore allegiance to our sovereign. And why do you, king, scare us with bitter and shameful deaths? If God is for us, then no one is against us! We are all ready to die for our faith and for our sovereign, but we will not surrender the city of Pskov... Get ready for the battle with us, and who will defeat whom, God will show."
A worthy response from the Pskovites finally destroyed Batory's hopes of exploiting Russia's internal difficulties. Having information about the oppositional moods of a part of Russian society, the Polish king did not have real information about the opinion of the overwhelming majority of the people. It did not bode well for the invaders. In the campaigns of 1580-1581. Batory met with stubborn resistance, which he did not count on. Acquainted with the Russians in practice, the king noted that they “did not think about life in defense of cities, cold-bloodedly took the place of the dead ... and blocked the gap with their chests, fighting day and night, eating only bread, dying of hunger, but not surrendering” . The defense of Pskov also revealed the weak side of the mercenary army. Russians died defending their land. Mercenaries fought for money. Having met with a staunch rebuff, they decided to save themselves for other wars. In addition, the maintenance of a mercenary army required huge funds from the Polish treasury, which by that time was already empty.
On November 2, 1581, a new assault took place. He was not distinguished by his former pressure and also failed. During the siege, the Pskovites destroyed tunnels and made 46 bold sorties. Simultaneously with Pskov, the Pskov-Caves Monastery also heroically defended, where 200 archers, led by the governor Nechaev, together with the monks, managed to repel the onslaught of a detachment of Hungarian and German mercenaries.
Yam-Zapolsky truce (signed on 15.01.1582 near Zapolsky Yam, south of Pskov). With the onset of cold weather, the mercenary army began to lose discipline and demand an end to the war. The battle for Pskov was the final chord of Batory's campaigns. It is a rare example of a successfully completed defense of the fortress without outside help. Having failed at Pskov, the Polish king was forced to start peace negotiations. Poland did not have the means to continue the war and borrowed money from abroad. After Pskov, Batory could no longer get a loan secured by his success. The Russian tsar also no longer hoped for a favorable outcome of the war and was in a hurry to take advantage of the difficulties of the Poles in order to get out of the fight with the least losses. On January 6 (15), 1582, the Yam-Zapolsky truce was concluded. The Polish king renounced claims to Russian territories, including Novgorod and Smolensk. Russia ceded the Livonian lands and Polotsk to Poland.
Defense of Nut (1582). While Batory was at war with Russia, the Swedes, having reinforced their army with Scottish mercenaries, continued offensive operations. In 1581 they finally ousted the Russian troops from Estonia. The last to fall was Narva, where 7,000 Russians perished. Then the Swedish army under the command of General Pontus Delagaree transferred hostilities to Russian territory, capturing Ivangorod, Yam and Koporye. But the attempt of the Swedes to take Oreshek (now Petrokrepost) in September - October 1582 ended in failure. The fortress was defended by a garrison under the command of the governors of Rostov, Sudakov and Khvostov. Delagardie tried to take Nut on the move, but the defenders of the fortress fought off the attack. Despite the setback, the Swedes did not retreat. On October 8, 1582, in a strong storm, they launched a decisive assault on the fortress. They managed to break the fortress wall in one place and break inside. But they were stopped by a bold counterattack by the garrison units. The autumn flood of the Neva and its strong excitement that day did not allow Delagardie to send reinforcements to the units that broke into the fortress in time. As a result, they were killed by the defenders of Nut and thrown into a stormy river.
Plyussky truce (concluded on the Plyussa River in August 1583). At that time, Russian cavalry regiments under the command of governor Shuisky were already hurrying from Novgorod to help the besieged. Having learned about the movement of fresh forces to Nut, Delagardie lifted the siege of the fortress and left the Russian possessions. In 1583, the Russians concluded the Truce of Plus with Sweden. The Swedes had not only Estonian lands, but also captured Russian cities: Ivangorod, Yam, Koporye, Korela with districts.
Thus ended the 25-year Livonian War. Its completion did not bring peace to the Baltics, which henceforth for a long time became the object of fierce rivalry between Poland and Sweden. This struggle seriously distracted both powers from affairs in the east. As for Russia, its interest in entering the Baltic has not disappeared. Moscow saved up strength and waited in the wings until Peter the Great completed the work begun by Ivan the Terrible.
