In contact with
Ilnar Garifullin
Alabuga (Tatarstan) is the most successful Special Economic Zone in the Russian Federation
The image of the future is not just a dream, but it is precisely a plan-representation, which in a good scenario will become a ready-made program of action.
Therefore, the most important, in my opinion, is the question of the form of the political system. Do we need a presidential republic or a parliamentary one? This issue should be put in a general referendum. In my opinion, the parliamentary form has more advantages, including from the point of view of building a real federalist model (or maybe a confederal one - that's up to the citizens themselves) of governance.
The whole history of mankind is a path from restrictive power to universal power. And humanity has tried all forms of both representative and direct democracy (democracy). Obviously, we will not be able to completely get away from representative democracy in the near future. But the role of mechanisms of direct democracy should certainly increase. And all this should be regulated in the legislative form. Referendums, territorial gatherings of citizens living in a certain territory, collection of signatures, etc. - all this should be legally regulated so that they become the real will of citizens, which will not only be taken into account by the executive authorities, but immediately implemented.
And of course, the current legislation, which does not allow the civil society to hold a referendum on any issue, should be immediately revised. This is necessary so that any group of citizens can easily (in the presence of public requests) initiate a direct expression of the will of citizens - a referendum.
The proportion of elected managerial positions should also be increased. For example, along with the election of the head of municipalities, judges and heads of district and city police departments, as well as district police officers, should be elected. In the event of an increase in elected positions, the citizens themselves will feel their responsibility for the decisions they make, and the administrative bodies will no longer depend on the whim of the higher authorities, but on the will of the citizens themselves.
As for Tatarstan itself, the first issue raised in the referendum should be the question of reunification of territories with a compact residence of Tatars, bordering on today's Tatarstan. The fact is that when the current borders of the Republic of Tatarstan were created after the end of the Civil War, many territories densely populated by Tatars were not included in the republic. Moreover, these were not territories located far from the borders of the future Tatarstan, but the most near-border ones. For example, this is a number of territories of the Ulyanovsk, Samara and Kirov regions, etc. But the most egregious example is the territory of present-day western Bashkortostan.
After the creation of Tatarstan, the future territorial structure of the three districts of the Ufa province (compactly populated by the Tatar population) was to be decided by a general referendum. However, despite the repeated requests of the chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the ATSSR (later TASSR) S. Said-Galiyev, this story ended with .... the entire territory of the Ufa province in a directive way, without any polling of the opinion of the population itself, was included in the Bashkir Republic. Later, in the era of stagnation, an attempt to artificially "Bashkirize" the Tatars led to the resignation in 1987 of the entire leadership of Bashkortostan. Already in the post-Soviet period, this history repeated itself again. During the 1990s and the beginning of the XXI century. Tatar organizations repeatedly and unsuccessfully initiated a referendum on the fate of the territory of the former Ufa province. The unresolved "Tatar issue" is still a permanent problem for both Bashkortostan itself and the entire Tatar ethnonation. Therefore, this issue must be resolved once and for all, and the population itself must have the last word.
The reunification of the territories densely populated by Tatars with the republic itself will significantly reduce the acuteness of the national question. However, in addition to this, it is necessary to return to the question on the status of national-cultural autonomies. It is the independence of the national republics, on the one hand, and a clear definition of the legal status of extraterritorial national-cultural autonomies (the Federal Law of 1996 does not work de facto today) that can solve this problem. The need for this is due to the fact that at present only 1/3 of the Tatar population lives in Tatarstan itself. And the Tatars, as the largest (after the Russians) and dispersed people in the Russian Federation, are interested in clarifying these issues as soon as possible.
It is worth mentioning that the national republics were created precisely as territorial autonomies for the political self-determination of individual peoples. Therefore, the national factor here should play a more significant role than just territorial or economic.
But in any case, in the wonderful future of our common country (which, I hope, awaits us all), acute territorial issues should also be resolved at referendums. It is the citizens themselves, and not “big” officials hiding behind their petty interests, and most importantly, not Moscow snobs who think that all the keys to the country’s future are in their hands, should determine their own destiny.
In a wonderful future, all current overt and covert bans on the development of the Tatar ethnonation should be lifted from Tatarstan. For example, the full and free functioning of the Tatar language is ensured along with the Russian language - after all, according to the constitution of Tatarstan and the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the federal and regional state languages have an equal status on their territory. This will allow once and for all to solve the problem of expanding the scope of the Tatar language both in Tatarstan itself and in regions where Tatars are densely populated. Restrictions on the development of national education should be lifted, such as: 1) a ban on taking the exam in the native language (this will immediately solve the problem of the functioning of national schools), 2) immediate permission to build the Tatar National University, a resolution on which was adopted back in 1994, but it has never been implemented.
For Tatarstan, as a Muslim republic, the Islamic factor is of great importance today. On an all-Russian scale, which way the entire Tatar ethnonation will go is important, first of all, for the simple reason that the Tatars have always been at the forefront of the entire Muslim Ummah of our country. This was the case even in Soviet times, when, it would seem, more numerous Uzbeks, Tajiks or Azerbaijanis should have neutralized the Tatar factor. That is, the fate and future of the entire Muslim Ummah of Russia, no matter how pathetic it sounds, depends precisely on the Tatar nation.
What should the Tatars do today? First, based on the traditions of the Tatar theological heritage, it is necessary to restore our theological school, which was characterized by free-thinking, tolerance and the ability to quickly respond to the challenges of the time - this is what the modern Muslim ummah around the world so lacks. And the Bulgarian Islamic Academy, which is scheduled to open in autumn 2017, should play a big role here. Secondly, mosques, madrasahs should become not just places for performing purely religious rites, but also cultural and educational centers. This will not only contribute to the preservation of the national self-consciousness and identity of the Tatars themselves, but will also breathe a great meaning into the existence of religious institutions. Moreover, there is no need to reinvent the wheel here - all this successfully functioned even in the pre-revolutionary period. It is only necessary to return the principle - not Tatars for Islam, but Islam for Tatars.
Of course, true federalism and the normal development of the regions cannot be built without the financial independence of the subjects of the Federation. The current situation, when the federal center collects about 75% of all taxes, cannot be called normal. The ideal option is no more than 40%. This will allow not only the regions to keep most of their income for their own socio-economic development (preventing the outflow of citizens in search of a better life in the "non-rubber" or abroad), but will also stimulate the subjects of the federation to increase the tax base - the development of the real sector of the economy.
I also think that in the bright future of Russia, the reform of the armed forces should be carried out. And instead of internal troops (now included in the Russian Guard) regions should be given the right to form their own republican guard(the word “national” here immediately introduces some undesirable ethnic connotation). To some extent, they will have to repeat the function of the American National Guard, but of course, taking into account Russian realities.
The republican guards should obey the representative bodies - the parliaments of the subjects of the federation, in order to remove the possible problem of using their parts for political purposes.
All restrictions on both interregional and international cooperation between subjects of the Russian Federation and foreign states should be removed. The presence of a special Treaty on the delimitation of powers between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tatarstan, even today, allows Tatarstan to pursue a cautious, but semi-independent economic policy. Thanks to this, for example, during the Russian-Turkish cooling (caused by the downed Russian plane on the Turkish-Syrian border in 2015), Tatarstan managed not only to maintain normal foreign relations with Turkey, but to increase Turkish investment in the Tatarstan economy, which eventually became a definite plus for the economy of the entire Russian Federation. The Alabuga Special Economic Zone (where the lion's share of investments of Turkish companies is concentrated) is by far the most successful example of a SEZ throughout Russia. That is, even today's example of the scanty and limited economic independence of Tatarstan clearly shows that it benefits not only one region, but the whole country as a whole.
Although it is worth noting right away that the clause of the Treaty that Tatarstan “promotes the linguistic and cultural development of the Tatars living in other regions of the Russian Federation” is not being implemented de facto. There are several reasons for this, but undoubtedly, in the future, such issues should be resolved. And Tatarstan itself should directly participate in defending the ethno-cultural and political interests of the Tatars living outside the republic. The removal of various kinds of restrictions on foreign economic and cultural ties will increase the attractiveness of individual regions and strengthen the position of the entire federation as a whole.
It makes sense to transfer part of the capital functions of Tatarstan to other cities located, not like the current Kazan on the outskirts, but deep inside the republic. The spread of metropolitan functions between two or even three centers will allow more active development of not only the center, but also peripheral territories. And in the conditions of a modern developed information society, there is no need to go to the capital for any paperwork or for solving an important issue. Now, a meeting of government departments (except, of course, the most urgent and vital ones) can be held online, and an electronic signature can be easily put remotely (by the way, this is already practiced by officials in Tatarstan).
That is, hyper-centralization in the economic sense of the word can and should be fought both at the federal level and at the regional level. And, by the way, the experience of successful Tatar villages (Middle Yeluzan in the Penza region, Shygyrdan in Chuvashia, Alkino in the Samara region, etc.) can serve as an example for the rest of Russia on how to stop the outflow of population to megacities. After all, a situation in which in the near future 1/5 of the population of the entire country will live in the Moscow region cannot be called normal.
And the state policy itself should not be aimed at building megacities, but at resettling people in small towns and villages. This meets several tasks at once - economic, social, demographic, as well as the simple preservation of a healthy gene pool of numerous Russian nations.
Tatarstan itself in a wonderful future is a national republic, where all the interests of the development of the Tatar ethnonation are taken into account, and representatives of other nationalities not only feel comfortable here, but also strive in every possible way to settle here. And the good socio-economic indicators (compared to most Russian regions) of the current republic (despite the presence of such all-Russian problems as corruption, etc.) against the backdrop of the current economic crisis clearly show that this is quite possible.
Some Russian journalists allow themselves to wishful thinking. For example, the Kazan journalist S. Beschetnova in the 33rd issue of Literaturnaya Gazeta for 1990 claimed that Russians “have also been living on the territory of Tatarstan for almost a thousand years.” And all this is asserted on mere emotions, without a single argument - without reference to a source or document.
If Russians have been living here for so many years, then why does the capital of the republic bear the Tatar name “Kazan” (“boiler”), this is how the great Russian linguist Vladimir Ivanovich Dal explains the name of the city, who, judging by his “Explanatory Dictionary”, thoroughly mastered not only Russian, but also knew the Tatar language well.
Before the conquest of Kazan and Astrakhan by Ivan the Terrible, the Middle and Lower Volga regions never belonged to Russia. Yes, the names of the ancient Volga cities testify to this: Simbirsk, Saratov, Astrakhan - these names are of Tatar origin. By the way, the name Tsaritsyn is also of Tatar origin. Those who doubt, I refer to the 6th volume of the classic edition "Russia" edited by V.P. Semenov, released exactly one hundred years ago, in 1901, in St. Petersburg not by Tatars, but by Russians.
Returning to the ignorance of the Tatars, I cannot keep silent about the fact that, unfortunately, they are inert, indifferent, and absolutely do not think about their future. Such Tatars believe that Shaimiev and Mukhametshin should protect them. They themselves are completely indifferent to their fate.
Every year in mid-October, Kazan celebrates the Day of Remembrance of the victims of the genocide of Ivan the Terrible in relation to the conquered people. This event gathers no more than a few thousand people on Freedom Square. But in the capitals of the Baltic republics, at least one hundred thousand people come out to such demonstrations.
I will dwell on the message that I put in the title of this article. Why do the Tatars have no future? Because they don't have their own state. Any nation deprived of its own state recognized by the world community is doomed to degeneration, it has no future - this is an axiom, which, unfortunately, does not reach the mind of other Tatar intellectuals either. It was as a result of the collapse of their own states that the Etruscans, Hittites, Parthians, Khazars disappeared - peoples who had a high culture for their era. For the same reason, there are very few Assyrians left in the world, and in fact in ancient times there was a great Assyrian power.
As a historian, I know to what extent the Tatars were oppressed under tsarism in the Kazan province.
As the Kazan historian N.N. Firsov, Russian, of course, "both the state authorities and the state church advised not to consider a Tatar even as a person if he is not baptized."
The situation of foreigners in other provinces was no better. So, in the Kovno province, where many Poles lived, in retaliation for the Polish uprising of 1863, the Polish language “was expelled from all public and private institutions and even just from public places - at railway stations, at the post office there were inscriptions: “Speak Polish prohibited." This is recalled in his essay “Imperial Policy in Lithuania” by the prominent tsarist dignitary Nikolai Pokrovsky. His essay was published in the 23rd issue of the Novoye Vremya weekly in 1991.
From all of the above, what is the conclusion? The conclusion is disappointing: any day our republic can be abolished and turned into an ordinary Russian province. Our already fairly Russified Tatar people do not even know how to behave in the conditions of the province. Here are the Balts, whom in the 18th century Peter I deprived of their own statehood, living in the provinces, they knew how to behave. In order to preserve themselves as a separate ethnic group, they lived separately, did not marry representatives of other ethnic groups. They believed that the time would come when they would revive their states. And such a time has come - by 1920 they revived their own states.
The Tatars, conquered by Russia almost 450 years ago, no longer believe in the possibility of creating their own state recognized by the world community. Some of them ask in surprise: “How can you create your own state while living in a real enclave?”
You can create your own sovereign state while living in an enclave. For example, on the Apennine Peninsula, in addition to Italy itself, in a real enclave there are two more independent states - the Vatican and San Marino. Both of these states are recognized by the world community, and no one in the Italian Parliament is demanding the abolition of these states. We must be optimists - believe in the possibility of creating our own state and, most importantly, strive for this. Only having their own state, our people will be able to confidently look into their future.
How does a schoolboy who was president for one day see the future of Tatarstan
For some, but tenth grader Amil Nurullin's New Year's dream came true - he spent the day in the chair (and even on board) of the president of Tatarstan. It happened like this: he wrote a letter addressed to Rustam Minnikhanov and was invited to see how the presidential work looks from the inside. A schoolboy who cares about the future of his native republic, talks in an interview with Realnoe Vremya about the humanitarian issues of Tatarstan's development.
“I spent my childhood in Portugal, I can compare this country and Tatarstan”
Tell me honestly, was it really your dream to be president? If so, can we say that it came true before the New Year?
Yes, one of my dreams came true. In a letter where I was thinking about Tatarstan and the Tatar people, I noted that in the future I want to become president. To spend one day as president is interesting. I wanted to gain experience, on the basis of which I can draw conclusions, what I need to pay attention to and what qualities to develop in myself for the future.
Why is it necessary to become president?
I have a desire to help the republic, participate in its development, move it forward and forward, improving the life of every inhabitant.
- What was written in the letter?
I wrote the letter in general terms, when we met with Rustam Nurgalievich, we talked about more specific projects. I spent my childhood in Portugal, I can compare this country and Tatarstan. There is something that we would like to improve, because Tatarstan should not only be ahead of other regions of Russia, but also ahead of the world. We must strive for this and become a competitor for developed countries. I spoke about two specific ideas (there are many different ideas, but these are formulated). The first is about the arrangement of school territories. This greatly affects the attitude towards the school. In my opinion, this is the same public space as a park or square, and it should look beautiful and clean. You can sit there before, between or after class. You can read and eat there. It must be a public place.
Any person can influence the situation. It should not be that among the entire population of the republic, only five were active. Everyone should be active and understand that you can influence
My second project is connected with the Tatar people and the Tatar language. What happened (the decision on the voluntariness of the study of the Tatar language, - approx. ed.) caused a lot of controversy. But, in my opinion, the problem is that the Tatars have an undeveloped national identity. When I returned from Portugal, I spoke Tatar and Portuguese. The Russian language only later became the language of communication for me. The Tatar language gradually began to be forgotten. It’s good that I have a dauani (“grandmother” in Tatar), who taught me Tukay’s poems. Thanks to her, I did not forget the Tatar language, but I began to forget. In the 5th-6th grade, I became interested in world history and noticed that the ancestors of the Tatars and the Tatars themselves are involved in so many events. It was at this moment that I awakened national self-consciousness. People are beginning to understand who, where they are from, who the Tatars are, what they did, what merits they have. I started learning the Tatar language myself. So I think the problem with the Tatar language is that people themselves don't know where they come from.
- Why did it happen that you moved to Portugal and who are your parents?
Dad is a massage therapist, mom is a financier. We moved to Portugal because of my father's work when I was 3 years old, but I already went to the first grade in Kazan.
“There must be a joint work of the government and children”
- How can the problems you are talking about be corrected?
Some say that the subject "History of Tatarstan and the Tatar people" should be introduced. But I don't think this is the right way. For the student, this will look like an additional burden and imposition. Cause only rejection. It seems to me that it is necessary to quietly give some facts from the history of the Tatars from the first grade. It could be a physics lesson where the teacher mentions that such and such physicists were born in Tatarstan and made such and such discoveries. The same Golden Horde poet Sayf Sarai says: "He circled around her, like the Earth around the Sun." This is shocking information considering we are always told that Copernicus was the first to discover heliocentrism. But all facts must be verified, of course. Just because a story is beautiful doesn't mean it's actually true. But this is just one example.
Is it necessary to be president in order to translate your ideas into reality? Is it possible to do something at the level of a schoolboy, without waiting for the entry into the presidency?
Certainly. Any person can influence the situation. It should not be that among the entire population of the republic, only five were active. Everyone should be active and understand that you can influence. I'm not the president. But even if I had not written to the president and had not received such publicity, I would still be sure that something could be done, at least on the scale of my school. If each class contains a part of some school territory and coordinates this with the leadership, so that everything is not motley, not like a fire in the jungle. If you distribute the territory, you can change your yard. But still, it should be a joint work of the government and children. There must be financial support.
I wanted to see a typical president's day, and I saw it. Maybe the president does not go to Nizhnekamsk and Almetyevsk every day, but still this day did not fit me
You are against the imposition of additional hours of Tatar culture at school, but you speak with regret about the voluntary format of language learning. How should Tatar education be structured?
I even wrote an article, I have it on the VKontakte page. If we look for the guilty, then everyone is to blame, and first of all the Tatars, who could not make the Tatar language a truly state language. At one time, the government made it a state one, but the support of the people quickly disappeared, this is not quite the support that was needed. And it was necessary to speak the language. Even among those who used to be active, children do not always speak Tatar or not always well. This is the mistake of the Tatars. The government missed the moment when it was possible to teach Tatar well, so that it was not an imposition. Good methods appeared rather late. This is untimely work. But I do not blame everything on the government, the people themselves did not participate, there was no self-awareness. I think we can fix this by getting to know history. Not everyone studies the history of Russia well, but we hear and see some facts - even in advertising, these are well-known facts. And I myself have not heard anything about the history of the Tatars. I only saw that the Institute of History. Marjani released a video - a brief history of the Tatars, this is a very good and correct method, but there should be more such things.
"On both sides of the parents so"
- When officials, teachers and parents argued about Tatar, how did your peers react to these discussions?
I myself was wondering how my friends perceive this issue. I also talked to friends from other schools and did not notice that someone was very upset or very happy. It was more of a parenting struggle. They even cursed among themselves - I have not heard such quarrels at our school, but I know that there were disputes, and even heated ones, in other schools. This is a short-term war of the parents themselves, the students did not participate in this problem. The load has not decreased. Instead of Tatar, they put Russian watches, and in some schools rhetoric, somewhere - the history of Tatarstan. But I hear from my friends that they wanted their parents to leave them the Tatar language, they say, it was more interesting to learn it than other subjects. But not all, there are those who are happy to go to a new lesson. But there were no heated arguments among the students. It's good, of course.
- Children demonstrated a more balanced position than adults?
Probably. The kids didn't pay much attention to it. Nobody allowed themselves to be insulted. I heard that parents said "chaplashka", "dungiz", "margin" - words that are below human dignity. Parents on both sides said so. But among children, I have not heard this.
The president told me: you never know what knowledge and skills will come in handy, and I think that the work of the president fully reveals this phrase
- Great news. Amil, so in the end, what conclusions did you draw from your presidential day?
I wanted to see a typical president's day, and I saw it. Maybe the president does not go to Nizhnekamsk and Almetyevsk every day, but still this day was not chosen for me. For example, I am more interested in social science and international law, and we visited TANECO, the board of directors of Tatneft. For me it was a completely new experience. The first thing I noticed for myself is that the ability to plan time is the main thing. If you know how to manage time, you can do everything you want. It can be said that the president does not do this himself (they make up a schedule for him), but I think that Rustam Nurgalievich knows how to manage time well himself. The second conclusion is that you need to learn how to quickly analyze information, quickly understand and draw conclusions based on the data. And the third - it is necessary to have knowledge in all areas of life. The president told me: you never know what knowledge and skills will come in handy, and I think that the work of the president fully reveals this phrase.
- Has the desire to move towards the presidency strengthened?
I was not disappointed, I liked it. I only became more convinced that we should strive for it.
Aigul Chuprina, photo vk.com
1. On secular power, Islam and Orthodoxy
Any godless ruler who has become the head of the country is afraid of the excessive religiosity of his subjects. The secular state began to actively intervene in the spiritual affairs of the inhabitants of Russia even under Peter 1. It was he who inflicted colossal harm on Orthodoxy, and indeed on the whole of Russian culture as a whole, subordinating religion to the interests of worldly life. After him, Christianity was finished off by his royal descendants and continued by the Bolsheviks. What can we say about Islam in pre-revolutionary Russia. The state machine was able not only to subdue, but also to nurture such a Muslim clergy in the Volga region that the Tatar people enthusiastically accepted the October Revolution of 1917.
One of my older Tatar comrades surprised me with a skeptical attitude towards Islam in his family, where the Muslim clergy could not stand the spirit. It turned out that his father's childhood fell on the 20s, when a terrible famine swept through Tatarstan. His parents died of malnutrition. The "special mullah" came and buried his parents. Then he went into the barn and took away the last sheep, which the parents took care of even from themselves, in order to somehow feed their offspring. The lean, bleating animal was followed by several pairs of hungry children's eyes. The spiritual mentor left these children to an obvious death, but he believed that this ram belongs to him by right - these are gur-sadakas. It was the degradation of this corrupt stratum of society that led the Tatars to support the revolution and became for the Bolsheviks a powerful striking force in the fight against the old regime and its henchmen in the form of the official clergy. But the so-called "grave alms" has nothing to do with Islam. This is a Tatar custom, which is unclear where and when it came from. Charging such sadaqah is a sin and is condemned in Islam.
It is not surprising that at present, the vast majority of Tatars do not read namaz and do not even go to the mosque for the Friday sermon, which is mandatory for a Muslim man. For the Orthodox, the situation is no better. For most of the population, secular authorities reduced Christianity to wearing a cross around the neck, and to religious trips to shrines. The celebration of the baptism of the Lord, for such "Christian women" comes down to wagging their tail in a bathing suit in front of other people's men. It got to the point that Russians believe that alcohol and smoking, an unrighteous way of life, are part of Christian culture: “we are not infidels to you” or “am I, a nun?”.
In order to somehow distance themselves from this demonism, a concept appeared in true Orthodoxy - churched. This is what they say about Christians who strive to live according to the commandments of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him). They periodically confess, take communion, perform other sacraments in accordance with their religion, do not drink alcohol, ignore the majority, the so-called. "civil holidays" February 23, March 8. Some of them do not even celebrate the New Year. As for Muslims, when it comes to a person striving to live according to the Koran and the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), they say that he is a practicing Muslim. They also do not recognize secular holidays, they read namaz 5 times a day at a clearly defined time, and go to the mosque on Fridays. Among Tatars and Russians, believing Muslims and Christians make up no more than 2% of the population. They are united by the main thing - faith in God.
It is symbolic that one tale is circulating among the Muslims of Tatarstan and, in my opinion, it is quite plausible. The Kul Sharif Mosque was originally closed for worship and used only as a museum. The late Patriarch of All Russia Alexy II once came to Kazan and Mintimer Shaimiev gave him a tour of the Kremlin. Upon learning that the Kul Sharif mosque was inactive, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church allegedly said: “We must pray,” and after that the mosque was opened for Muslims.
2. About modern semi-paganism
And who are these other 98% of the Russian population then? I think, better than the journalist of "Moskovsky Komsomolets" Elizaveta Alexandrova-Zorina, no one can indicate the religious affiliation of these people: "our religion is consumption, our temple is a supermarket." People continue to invent idols for themselves, despite the fact that this is a clear delusion. Thus, from the point of view of monotheistic religions, they are actually pagans. Despite ethnic diversity: Russians and Tatars, Dagestanis and Chuvashs, they all perform the same pagan rites. They celebrate the same holidays: New Year, March 8, February 23, they watch the same TV channels, where violence and debauchery are promoted around the clock, they listen to the same primitive songs. Their youth is equally dissolute, uneducated and unable to respect other people's cultural characteristics. Ethnic Russians from the village of Kushchevskaya, during their 19 years of lawlessness, raped at least 220 girls aged 14 to 20. They are not much different from the same scum from the representatives of the peoples of the Volga region, the North Caucasus or Central Asia. The only difference is that some profess semi-paganism with elements of Orthodox culture, while others profess semi-paganism with elements of Muslim culture.
Nothing can be done, but faith in the Lord is a great gift that is not given by the Lord to everyone. You can spend a day on the span in prostrations with a request to Him to allow him to believe in Him, but if He does not want it, then no force will lead a person to the righteous path, and if Allah guides a person to the right path, then no force will be able to knock him off that path. Therefore, truly unfortunate are those people whose hearts God has sealed and who cannot get out of ignorance until the end of their days. They are forced to fill the void in their souls with various delusional ideas, to create “plush” idols for themselves.
This godless majority of the population of Russia, as it is not regrettable to admit, includes most of the intelligentsia, politicians, representatives of the special services, the armed forces, and even part of the official clergy - in short, a political party that determines the present and future of the country. For the most part, these are decent people, law-abiding citizens of Russia. By inertia, they call themselves Muslims or Orthodox, because they think that for this it is enough to be just a good person. And this, in turn, in their opinion, gives them the right to interfere in the religious life of the two percent religious community in the country.
3. Russian nationalism as a factor in the fight against Islam in Russia
The most intellectual part of the godless majority, which does not want to worship vodka, money or some stage semi-finished product, goes into nationalism. Such Tatars, for example, are trying to build an independent Tatarstan, exalting their national characteristics, and such Russians have put Great Russia in the place of God. At the same time, they see a lot of flaws in her and do not want to love her for who she is. They are in constant fuss, perfecting their god - they need Russia without “chocks” and other “exotics”. The desire for unification and absorption of other peoples in the Russian people is genetic, since this, in their understanding, leads to the strengthening of Russia, which, perhaps, is not devoid of logic. It is worth noting that Russian chauvinism by its nature has never been overly squeamish towards representatives of other peoples. In his view, having been born a “chump”, one can successfully be reborn into a “full-fledged person”, having lost their cultural characteristics.
Thus, Russian semi-pagans are opposed to semi-pagans from national minorities. And since the elements of Islam complicate the policy of Russification of ethnic Muslims, who, however, paradoxically no longer profess this religion, it is necessary:
To lead people into mythology and nationalism, albeit anti-Russian, at first (for this they are ready to tolerate even Rafael Khakimov),
In the Russian majority, to create a feeling of intolerance towards Islam and towards the peoples - its bearers,
Constantly divide Muslims among themselves, inciting each other,
And, most importantly, to discredit Islam in the eyes of ethnic Muslims.
The Russian, and by the way, not entirely Russian, nationalist-minded intellectual elite is constantly fueling intolerance towards Islam. The media, especially television, creates a negative image of Muslims, using the same semi-pagans who have lost touch with God from among the visiting Caucasians and Asians. Domestic conflicts involving "newcomers" are presented as interfaith strife. And it is difficult to explain to anyone that there can be no interfaith strife between a Russian atheist and a Dagestan atheist. They have a religion, in general, one - it is paganism, because the believer would try to avoid the condemned. This means that this is an intra-confessional disassembly of atheists. At the same time, they very often play tricks alone, and true believers, who are many both among Russian people and people from the North Caucasus, have to answer. But it is not customary for us to demonstrate the positive influence of Islam on the minds of people for all to see.
Meanwhile, the “problem” of the Russification of the peoples of Russia is no longer just psycho-loners, but entire institutions financed from the budget. How not to quote Alexander Dugin, professor, head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations at Moscow State University: “The development of Sufism, ethnomythology, a return to the ethnic traditions of local peoples, which will strengthen their fragmentation, which will exacerbate a very complex mosaic structure, is extremely beneficial for us.” He seems to be a very patient person and does not seek to immediately impudently "baptize" the Tatars and other non-Russians, as his predecessors did. He has a whole plan: first, we will split Islam, at the same time we will lead him into ethnomythology and national traditions.
The bloggers Yana Amelina and Nina Zveroboeva are more categorical in their statements. The lawyer of the Kama Human Rights Center, Rustem Valiullin, who analyzed their publications on the Internet, came to a disappointing conclusion that these names were hiding the same citizen who, judging by her records, is committed to Orthodox Christianity and sees salvation in a fanatical commitment to Orthodox fundamentalism, and in “Orthodox fascism." At the same time, she accepts an exclusively forceful method of solving problems in preaching Orthodox Christianity to others and denies other methods of persuading people. In addition, he considers the arrests of the Orthodox, organizing pogroms among people of other faiths, unfair. She herself threatens people who do not adhere to her views with reprisals; openly denies the need for tolerance in society; openly supports persons who commit violent acts motivated by national, religious and racial hatred. The victory of Orthodoxy, in her opinion, is inevitable.
Muslims of the republic are sure that these calls for hatred belong to Yana Amelina, head of the Caucasus sector of the presidential Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, which is located in Moscow. This person is considered in Tatarstan as an "expert on Islam" and it was she who for a long time tried to tell the authorities which Muslims should be fought and which ones should be supported. She did this under the guise of fighting the terrorist threat, however, her true motives are visible after visiting her blogs, in which she naturally refused authorship, after the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Tatarstan paid attention to them. All these extremist blog entries soon disappeared, but copies of these pages are kept by Muslim anti-fascists. Some analysts attribute the current destabilization of the situation in Tatarstan to the arrival in Kazan a few years ago of this very fighter against Wahhabism and the creation in Kazan of her offspring - the Volga Center for Regional and Ethno-Religious Studies of the RISS. At present, she is in South Ossetia, but after returning from there, she may continue her work to further divide the Muslims of the republic. In the meantime, this “difficult and responsible” work is being done by her associate Rais Suleymanov. In the last issue of the Zvezda Povolzhya newspaper, in an article with the characteristic headline "Wahhabi revenge", he went so far as to accuse Tatneft's leadership of supporting Wahhabism. There was a feeling that this was done at the suggestion of the Spiritual Muslim Board of the Republic of Tatarstan, whose leadership closely cooperates with the Suleiman-Amelin "New Baptism Office", which uses the rhetoric of the odious "Muslim official" Valiulla Yakupov. It can be assumed that the whole point is in the personal resentment of Ildus Fayzov, against the general director of Tatneft, Shafagat Takhautdinov, who, as they say, refuses to personally meet the infamous mufti.
4. Struggle within the Muslim Ummah of Tatarstan
In Tatarstan, out of 2 million Tatars, 20,000-40,000 are practicing Muslims. The main part of the Muslims of the republic are adherents of the madhab of Abu Hanifa (Hanafis), in addition, there are quite a few non-madhabists (Salafis, Wahhabis), i.e. those who do not recognize the existing religious-legal schools in Islam. In theological matters they have no unity. In addition, even among the Hanafi there are certain disagreements: there are followers of the Maturidi aqida, there is a small part of the Sufis, and so on. That is, Islam in Tatarstan, despite its small number, is very mosaic, which creates certain inconveniences. The Hanafi and the unmadhhab in matters of faith are irreconcilable rivals. However, this did not prevent them from coexisting quite peacefully over the past 20 years. The fact is that they are all followers of the Sunnah of the Prophet (s.a.s.) and are not carriers of extremist views. They pray in the same mosques, stand behind the same imams.
Nevertheless, intimidation of Islamic fundamentalism, Wahhabism, which was allegedly spread by the predecessor of the current mufti, has simultaneously begun in the local media. All this was accompanied by a purge of the "old" Muslim cadres. For example, in Yelabuga, a respected muhtasib, who actively promoted the Hanafi madhhab in Yelabuga without noise or pomp, was replaced by a hyperactive babai, who in a short time was able not only to quarrel with representatives of traditional Islam, but also discredited him in the eyes of young people. In Almetyevsk, the mukhtasib was a very authoritative person, but allegedly did not adhere to traditional Islam. In his place, they put a fairly competent Hanafi, but, apparently, devoid of organizational skills. He never managed to establish contact with the local population, which periodically provokes scandals in Almetyevsk mosques. In Nizhnekamsk, a man was appointed head of the madrasah, whose resume leaves much to be desired - wherever he worked before, everywhere his activities ended in conflicts. These actions led to tension among the Muslims of Tatarstan, exposing the absolutely illiterate personnel policy of the muftiate.
Having failed to maintain the unity of the Ummah, and, in fact, having spoiled the image of the republic, our mufti, as if nothing had happened, is already encroaching on the Kazan Kremlin. At the recently held plenum of the Spiritual Muslim Board of the Republic of Tatarstan, he already openly offered himself as the first imam of the Kul Sharif mosque. Now it is clear what the campaign for discrimination against Ramil Yunusov, the current imam of the main Muslim temple of the republic, was connected with. It is obvious that the current mufti does not like competitors, since he is not competitive himself. But there is one intrigue here - the Kul Sharif mosque does not belong to the DUM RT. Offering himself as an imam, Ildus Fayzov makes a challenge, already to the president of the republic, putting the latter in an awkward position.
At the same time, figures from the Spiritual Muslim Board of the Republic of Tatarstan, with their characteristic rhetoric, justify their actions by fighting extremism, citing the “Nurlat events” as an example. It is worth noting that the representatives of the group destroyed there had nothing to do with Almetyevsk, Nizhnekamsk, or Yelabuga. They were just from the “prosperous Hanafi areas”, where apparently they could not find authoritative Muslims, and eventually found them on the Internet.
Well, the attempt of Muslim “leaders” to promote the Hanafi madhhab with the help of secular authorities, including with the help of special services, speaks of their mediocrity and illiteracy in matters of theology, their inability to defend their point of view, to convince the fallacy of Salafi views. Unfortunately, all this fuss had the opposite effect, creating a false sense of the uncompetitiveness of the Hanafi madhhab in relation to the Salafis. By the way, to this day, no one has made a single attempt to start a dialogue between representatives of Salafis and Hanafis, and there is no other way to lead a person to a change of beliefs.
5. Why are Salafis being fought in Russia?
In some regions of Russia, the official Muslim clergy, with the support of the authorities, is fighting the so-called. Salafis or Wahhabis. At the same time, it should be noted that this trend of Islam is not prohibited in Russia. Through some media, people are being instilled with the idea that the reason for such dislike for representatives of non-traditional Islam lies in the fact that they profess some kind of special Islam, the followers of which are terrorists and extremists. But the Muslims of Tatarstan communicate with each other and, as a rule, are personally acquainted with these guys. They know that the non-madhabs are the same normal Muslims, and among them there are many people who have a huge amount of knowledge and whose lifestyle often becomes a role model. They are active, well-read and constantly talk about Islam. The Hanafis do not agree with them and often consider them as lost, which, however, is mutual, but do not see these brothers as a danger to others.
Special services officers explain their dislike for Salafists by bitter statistics - in their opinion, most of the terrorist attacks in Russia were committed by Salafis. But, in my opinion, this is only part of the truth. In the North Caucasus, as you know, there is a civil war, which some politicians are trying to give a religious character. It is led by people who are faced with bureaucratic greed, police lawlessness, and Russian corruption in general. But the authorities will never admit that terrorist attacks in Russia are carried out by disgruntled citizens of the country, who have very different motives for these reckless actions. Of course, the Islamic factor is present here, but it lies in the fact that compassionate rich co-religionists from abroad help their brothers who find themselves in a difficult situation to wage this war. If the Arabs of the kingdom were representatives of, say, the Maliki madhhab, they would still not leave their brothers in faith without financial assistance. All this means that the Salafists in some regions of Russia are waging war not because of their own, some special belief, as they are trying to instill in us, but because of the circumstances. Their faith does not pose a threat to society. I think that analysts in Moscow are well aware of this, but for some reason they are misleading us.
Perhaps the real reason is, sadly enough, to admit that the Saudi sheikhs are heavily influenced by the US. And this is one of the most terrible and insidious opponents of Russia. We see how the Americans are bringing their democracy to various corners of the world in the most unscrupulous way. Wherever these servants of Satan appear with their striped flags, confusion begins. I do not rule out that some analysts in Russia are afraid that through the Arab political elite, the Americans can stir up the situation in our country, using adherents of non-madhabism. Of course, it is difficult to imagine that a well-fed resident of Tatarstan, buying into the agitation of an Arab, would tie an orange ribbon on a Kalashnikov assault rifle. Therefore, one gets the feeling that the Salafis after all are just an excuse for purposefully destabilizing the situation in the republic. And, perhaps, this is a maneuver that distracts us from their main goal - the traditional Hanafi madhhab for the Tatars?
6. Do Muslims have an alternative to Arabs?
Iran, as one of the powerful Muslim centers not controlled by the United States, should not even be considered as an alternative - it is a Shiite country. But in the world, strange as it may seem, there is another major center of Islam, independent of the Arab world and the Americans. Moreover, they promote the Hanafi madhhab and adhere to the Maturidite aqida (belief), beloved by the Tatarstan clergy. And that's not all - they are Sufis! We are talking about the countries of South and Central Asia - India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. It would seem that this is a gift for the fighters against the Salafis. However, representatives of this Islam in Russia are known under the brands "Dushmans" and "Taliban" and I think that Moscow analysts are more afraid of them than the Salafis.
If they come to Central Asia, then the "Basmachi" of the 20s will seem like child's play. Real, vigorous, and not some kind of pro-American Islamism in the end, of course, will seep into Russia. It should not be forgotten that in Afghanistan people from the Volga region, united in the Bulgar Jamaat, are also fighting the Americans. I want to draw attention to the fact that the jamaat is called not Tatar, but Bulgarian. During its heyday, Volga Bulgaria was an emirate within the Arab Caliphate. The ruins of a mosque of the 12th century, located in the city of Yelabuga, testify to that great era. Thus, from the point of view of Muslims, Tatarstan is the northernmost primordial Islamic territory.
That is why, despite the uncompromising struggle of the Taliban against drug dealers inside their country, Russia does not seek to support them. At the same time, she turns a blind eye to NATO's actions in Afghanistan, which, on the contrary, contribute to the drug industry, primarily oriented towards Russia. Secular power in the Central Asian republics is certainly a natural filter given by the spread of this Islam, but everything can crumble overnight. They are already trying to plant a "bomb" under Russia in this region, and, as always, not without the participation of the United States. In Central Asia, talk is being circulated about the creation of a "Great Uzbekistan". We are talking about joining to Uzbekistan the territories inhabited by Uzbeks, not only Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan, but even northern Afghanistan. Thus, on the territory of the former USSR there will appear citizens who have never been members of the pioneers, the Komsomol and the CPSU. And an attempt to redraw the borders will draw the region into a military conflict for at least several decades, which will certainly lead to the Islamization of the people inhabiting this region. In the meantime, while there is time and the "Basmachi" are not on the border with Kazakhstan, some anti-Islamic forces inside Russia will convince the country's political elite of the need to fight Islam in the Volga region.
7. Traditional Russian Islam
The obvious conclusion for the federals is that if there is to be Islam in Russia, then it must be its own home-grown traditional Islam. It should not be controlled by anyone in the world, except for the Russian state. Naturally, this is not about adherence to some traditional madhhab, as some Muslims perceive it, for example, the Hanafi among the Tatars or the Shaifi among the Dagestanis. We are talking about traditional pre-revolutionary loyalty, mixed with superstition and ignorance. It should serve ethnic Muslims from a traditional ritual point of view: naming a newborn, nikah, funeral. Gradually, preparing this mass, professing semi-pagan Islam, for the transition to the same semi-pagan Orthodoxy.
No one will allow turning Russia into a genuine Muslim center with serious theologians. On the one hand, this will allow the growth of popular, low-intellectual Islam, which will scare away sane people, on the other hand, there will always be smart people who go to study abroad. Returning from there, they will come into conflict with local literates, and this will create the constant tension necessary for the authorities within the Muslim Ummah of Russia. The struggle between traditional and non-traditional Islam will thus continue indefinitely. And this will more and more lead to the aversion of ethnic Muslims from Islam.
Thus, the coming to power of the current mufti Ildus Fayzov was not accidental. After all, genuine Islam of both directions began to take serious roots in the republic. It became obvious that in 20 years respected women in mosques will not be semi-literate old people who came to Islam after retirement, but Muslims who have practiced Islam throughout their lives, who have deep knowledge and an excellent reputation. So, apparently, they decided to use a person who became famous for his intolerance of dissent for the construction of "fake Islam". For adherents of this religion, it is important that there are more holidays in the country, beer and gasoline do not rise in price and free fishing is preserved.
Islamic expert
Yelabuga journalistic organization
Union of Journalists of the Republic of Tatarstan
Linur Miftakhov
Recently, more and more often in the media, the Republic of Tatarstan is somewhat exaggeratedly positioned as the last stronghold of federalism in Russia, which has long ceased to be a federation. Predictions about the republic are very different: starting from the fact that the Kremlin will soon change the leadership of the republic to one more loyal to the federal center, and ending with the fact that the republic will be completely liquidated as a subject of the federation. In any case, the forecasts that are found on the pages of completely uninterested Internet publications speak of the imminent and complete end of Tatarstan statehood as part of the Russian Federation and the departure of the republic to Moscow with giblets.
The main reasons for such conclusions, which were not comforting for the previously relatively independent Tatarstan, were two interconnected events. The first, natural: the expiration of the term of the agreement between Russia and Tatarstan, extended in 2007 for another ten years, which no one is in a hurry to extend for a new term. The second event, already artificial and certainly not accidental: the collapse of Tatfondbank, the largest commercial bank in the republic. The bankruptcy of this usurious organization gave rise to almost a Maidan on the scale of the republic. Depositors left with nothing, realizing that they will not see money as their ears, go out to protest every day, not forgetting to send a petition to Putin demanding the resignation of the government of Tatarstan. It is possible that, under this plausible pretext, the leadership of the republic will indeed be removed as having lost the trust of the people and replaced by another, more loyal to the Kremlin. Although much more loyal than Minnikhanov? In my opinion, his timid criticism of the policy of dispossession of economically prosperous regions does not activate any powerful Tatar national forces (are there any left at all?), capable of adequately objecting and responding to the federal center, and does not make any difference at all.
Be that as it may, the second version of the development of events for the republic, according to which Tatarstan will be completely liquidated as a subject of the Russian Federation and territorially merged with Mari El, Chuvashia and the Ulyanovsk region , we will reject it as untenable and unconfirmed for now. It is strange in general that it was picked up by such a publication as the "Voice of Islam", for which "yellowness" is completely uncharacteristic. In any case, if we are talking about the program of consolidation of regions until 2030, then when I tried to get acquainted with it in general terms, I did not find anything about Tatarstan there. As for the first version, according to which the Kremlin will put its own people in power in the republic, it seems quite plausible and natural.
It is not worth being surprised if all the above predictions still come true. The systematic attack on federalism in Russia was carried out slowly, but purposefully, throughout Putin's rule. Recall that the current division of the country on a national-territorial (mixed) basis began with the Bolsheviks, who acted very prudently, giving the peoples within Russia the right to self-determination, which the leaders of the white movement refused to grant them (Denikin, for example). After the collapse of the USSR, Yeltsin, who came to power, also fully respected the right of all, even the smallest, peoples to self-determination. It was under Yeltsin that the current constitution was adopted, according to which the newly minted Russian Federation included twenty-one republics, boldly called "states" in the text of the constitution, and ten autonomous regions. When Putin came to power, having solved more pressing issues for himself, he gradually got to the federal structure.
It was 2005. I was a second year student at the time. We have just begun a subject called "Constitutional Law". And it was then that in the composition of the Russian Federation, as they say, "the first went." The Komi-Permyatsky Autonomous Okrug was liquidated, merged with the Perm Region, forming a new single entity called the Perm Territory. I remember how, at seminars on constitutional law, we discussed this event with a teacher. We, inexperienced students, were unaware that a unique precedent had been created in Russia in its entire recent history, which became the first step in the offensive against the self-determination of peoples and federalism. Of the eighty-nine subjects of the federation that were under Yeltsin, eighty-eight remained. And then, as if on knurled, year after year, they began to reorganize the rest of the autonomous okrugs, either merging them with other regions, forming new ones, or simply including them in their composition, without forming new ones. So gradually all the autonomous okrugs, with the exception of Chukotka, dissolved into the composition of regions and territories. Now, taking into account the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol, I find it difficult to say how many subjects are in the Russian Federation. Who is not lazy, count in the 65th article of the constitution. Of course, there was no dissatisfaction on the part of the indigenous inhabitants of the national autonomous regions. And if it was, no one noticed. I must say that Russia generally treated some indigenous peoples quite nasty, bringing them to complete degradation, so that they generally did not care about all the natural wealth of their native places. an example of this degradation is described.
That is why it is not surprising that over time, from the Nenets, Khanty, Evenki and other Eskimos, they got to the more numerous and civilized inhabitants of the national republics. Even such seemingly petty factors as changing the title of the post "president" to "head of the republic" do not happen by chance. They make you forget that the republics are still called states in the constitution (Part 2, Article 5). It is quite logical that the head of state is the president. And that is why it is not surprising that the clouds are gathering over Tatarstan. The Republic seems to be reminded: "You have sat too long with your sovereignty and the president, you forgot what year it is. It's time to respect the Empire and stop playing independence."
And yet, those people who escalate the situation and paint the future of Tatarstan in dark colors, predicting complete assimilation of the Tatar people, consider this issue only from the point of view of ordinary Tatar nationalism. Perhaps, from this side they are losing something, although in many ways they exaggerate the criticality of the situation. Those who wish to preserve the language and national identity, and as part of the empire, will easily preserve this. Those who themselves want to dissolve into the titular nation, call themselves Russian names, be baptized, so after all, mankurts are mankurts in Africa, where without them? We must consider possible reforms of federalism from the point of view of harm and benefit for Islam and Muslims.
Firstly, all processes taking place in state power structures occur only by the will and desire of Allah. Whatever decisions were made and carried out, it happened only because Allah so willed:
"You will not desire it unless Allah, the Lord of the worlds, desires it.(Twisting, 29).
Secondly, in every decision of Allah there is a good for people, even if initially this decision is seen by people as unfavorable for them.
"Perhaps you dislike what is good for you. And perhaps you love what is evil for you. Allah knows, but you do not know" (Cow, 216).
Therefore, no matter how some people escalate the situation regarding a possible future, one should never panic ahead of time. Nobody knows how everything will turn out. Conversely, those who find occasion for gloating in possible forthcoming events should not be in a hurry to rejoice. We all remember how the Russians, zombified by propaganda, rejoiced at the unleashed conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which at first developed in favor of the first. And today many compatriots are trying to put a good face on a bad game. However, everyone is well aware that life in Russia will never be the same as it was before the events of 2014. Russians will never live the way they did in the first decade of the 21st century. Life in the country has not changed for the better - and this is not liberal whining, but ordinary realism.
Thirdly, people receive that power, that economy and internal politics that they deserve through their faith and their deeds.
"Say: "O Allah, Lord of the kingdom! You give power to whomever You wish, and You take away power from whomever You wish ..."(Family of Imran, 26).
Qatada ibn Diam (tabi'in) said: "The children of Israel said, 'O our Lord! You are in heaven and we are on earth. How can we tell when You are pleased with us and when You are angry?" He replied: "If I put the best of you over you, then I am pleased with you, and if I put the worst of you over you, then this means that I am angry with you! "
Therefore, predicting a possible future for Islam and Muslims, one should first of all look not at who is in power in the country and in the republic, but at what kind of Muslims are in the republic and throughout the country. And I dare to note that at the grassroots level, the Muslims of Tatarstan are very promising. Islam takes root more and more firmly in their hearts and penetrates into all spheres of life. In fact, we already have an invisible and tacit autonomy, a kind of state within a state. Or the ghetto - whichever you prefer. There is solidarity and mutual trade among Muslims. We have "our own" sellers of all kinds of goods, and cafe owners, and car mechanics, and tire workers, and realtors, and doctors, and hairdressers, and builders - in other words, experts in a wide variety of areas of everyday life from among Muslims. If I need some kind of specialist, I just find a Muslim who does this and turn to him. You need to find an apartment - Muslims and Muslim women provide realtor services. We need a move - a Muslim with his "Gazelle" and with his loaders will come and transport. You need to see a doctor - there are Muslims in medicine. More and more people from among non-Muslims turn to my co-religionists, because they understand that Muslims do not deceive anyone. Everywhere you can only hear from people that there are scammers and swindlers around who take money for services and then disappear, or sell some low-quality products. And Muslims, in principle, are deprived of such risks. We do not even think about it, because each of us is aware of the responsibility before Allah, Who sees everything. Thus, while the official clergy are fighting with each other for a place in the sun, while they are figuring out among themselves whose muftiate is more "true", the Ummah, independently of them, develops and is, in the apt expression of Heydar Dzhemal, "passionately seething cauldron" . It's simple: if Allah is pleased with us, then He will put normal power over us. If He is angry with us or wants to test us with temporary hardships, He will establish some other power over us. Everything happens in one way or another according to His wisdom and predestination.
Fourth. No matter how competent forecasts for the future are, no matter how far-sighted people who assess the political situation in the republic and in the country, we must not forget that the final decision on the future belongs to Allah, besides Whom no one knows this future.
"No man knows what he will gain tomorrow, and no man knows in what land he will die. Verily, Allah is Knowing, Knowing" (Lukman, 34).
Experts can make forecasts only on the basis of a detailed analysis of an already existing situation. However, Allah often decides everything in the most unpredictable way. So, not a single political scientist or analyst is able to foresee what is commonly called force majeure: a plane crash, death, death, the murder of a person on whom much depends in the current state of affairs, and so on. Strategies and planning are good and important in politics, but the result is up to Allah Almighty.
Fifth. If the supreme power decides to apply an option that for the foreseeable future is still seen as unlikely, colossally costly for a country that is in debt, like silk, and generally fantastic - that is, a radical change in the federal structure of Russia by abolishing the republics and switching to provinces - then it is not fatal. We should not forget that we Muslims are not nationalists, but rather internationalists (in the good sense of the word). It is not so important for us the right of nations to self-determination, not what language our descendants will speak, but the worship of the One Creator without assigning partners to Him. It is Islam that serves as a unifying factor and a guarantee of peace between representatives of different races and peoples.
"Remember the mercy that Allah showed you when you were enemies, and He united your hearts, and by His mercy you became brothers" (Imran Family, 103).
Our predecessors, the Muslims of the Russian Empire, already lived under such a state system, when no one gave them any autonomy and no republics. At the same time, they were given the opportunity to freely practice their religion and worship Allah while living on this earth. Of course, the current explosive mixture of the tsar and the scoop has little in common with the true Russian monarchy, the properties of which have apparently been lost forever. However, once again we recall that the power of any person is not unlimited, no matter how powerful he may feel. Power is limited by limits set by Allah. And we know that in history there were cases when some people wished harm to Islam and Muslims, built insidious plans against them, but as a result, Allah punished them by starting to quarrel with each other and eliminate each other from the road, while while Muslims at that time continued to live their lives quietly and worship Allah.
Summing up, we note that the future belongs to Allah. As true knowledge of this future, and all the events that will take place there. As for the state structure - whether it is a federation, whether it is a unitary - then this is nothing more than one of the small particles of centuries-old worldly life, which sooner or later will dissolve in millions of others, like a molecule.
And praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds.
