Technique san results in tables. Analysis of the obtained data according to the methods of dignity

To take the test, you will need a piece of paper and a pen.

Instruction:

This blank test is intended for the rapid assessment of well-being, activity and mood (the questionnaire is named after the first letters of these functional states).

The essence of assessment is that the subjects are asked to correlate their state with a number of signs on a multi-stage scale. This scale consists of indices (3 2 1 0 1 2 3) and is located between thirty pairs of words of opposite meaning, reflecting mobility, speed and rate of functions (activity), strength, health, fatigue (well-being), as well as characteristics of the emotional state ( mood). The subject must select and mark the number that most accurately reflects his condition at the time of the examination. The advantage of the technique is its repeatability, that is, it is permissible to repeatedly use the test with the same subject.

During processing, these figures are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; index 2 following it - for 2; index 1 - for 3 points and so on until index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points (note that the poles of the scale are constantly changing).

So, positive states always score high, and negative states always score low. According to these "reduced" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood. For example, the average scores for a sample of Moscow students are: well-being - 5.4; activity - 5.0; mood - 5.1.

It should be mentioned that when analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. The fact is that in a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. And as fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease in well-being and activity compared to mood.

Test material:

1	Feeling good	1	2	3	1	2	3	Feeling bad	1
2	Feel strong	3	2	1	1	2	3	I feel weak	2
3	Passive	3	2	1	1	2	3	Active	3
4	Sedentary	3	2	1	1	2	3	Mobile	4
5	Cheerful	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sad	5
6	Good mood	3	2	1	1	2	3	Bad mood	6
7	workable	3	2	1	1	2	3	Broken	7
8	Full of strength	3	2	1	1	2	3	Exhausted	8
9	Slow	3	2	1	1	2	3	Fast	9
10	Inactive	3	2	1	1	2	3	Active	10
11	Happy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Unhappy	11
12	Cheerful	3	2	1	1	2	3	Gloomy	12
13	Tense	3	2	1	1	2	3	Relaxed	13
14	Healthy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sick	14
15	Indifferent	3	2	1	1	2	3	Hooked on	15
16	Indifferent	3	2	1	1	2	3	Excited	16
17	Enthusiastic	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sad	17
18	Glad	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sad	18
19	Rested	3	2	1	1	2	3	Tired	19
20	Fresh	3	2	1	1	2	3	Exhausted	20
21	Sleepy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Excited	21
22	Desire to rest	3	2	1	1	2	3	A desire to work	22
23	Calm	3	2	1	1	2	3	preoccupied	23
24	Optimistic	3	2	1	1	2	3	Pessimistic	24
25	Hardy	3	2	1	1	2	3	weary	25
26	Bouncy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sluggish	26
27	It's hard to think	3	2	1	1	2	3	It's easy to think	27
28	scattered	3	2	1	1	2	3	Attentive	28
29	full of hope	3	2	1	1	2	3	Disappointed	29
30	Pleased	3	2	1	1	2	3	Dissatisfied	30

Test key:

Questions on well-being – 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26.
Questions on activity – 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28.
Questions on mood – 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30.

Processing and interpretation of test results:

When processing, the estimates of the respondents are recoded as follows: index 3, corresponding to unsatisfactory health, low activity and bad mood, is taken as 1 point; following him index 2- for 2; index 1- for 3 points and so on index 3 on the opposite side of the scale, which is accordingly taken as 7 points ( Attention: the poles of the scale are constantly changing).

Positive states always score high and negative states always score low. According to these "reduced" scores, the arithmetic mean is calculated both in general and separately for activity, well-being and mood. For example, the average grades for a sample of Moscow students are:

well-being - 5.4;
activity - 5.0;
mood - 5.1.

When analyzing the functional state, not only the values of its individual indicators are important, but also their ratio. In a rested person, the assessments of activity, mood and well-being are usually approximately equal. As fatigue increases, the ratio between them changes due to a relative decrease well-being and activity compared with mood.

The most important task of a school psychologist is to control the psychological well-being of adolescents. The SAN method (“Health, activity, mood”) can help with this - the most effective way to identify the current state of students.

Methodology "Health, activity, mood": authors and purpose

This technique was developed in 1973 by a group of Soviet scientists headed by physiologist and hygienist Valery Doskin.

Doskin Valery Anatolyevich (born September 23, 1941, Stalingrad) - physiologist, hygienist, Doctor of Medical Sciences (1986), professor (1991), Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation (2001). RMA NPO Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

Purpose - a quick assessment of the current psychological state of the individual. It is used in work with schoolchildren and students. It is important to remember that this method of assessment is designed for students 14 years of age or older.

Description of the diagnostic procedure

To conduct diagnostics using the SAN method, ask a student (or a group of students) to fill out a special form. The form contains 30 alternative states, for example, "I'm happy - I'm unhappy", "I'm happy - I'm sad." Between these definitions is a scale: 3-2-1-0-1-2-3. If the student feels happy, he underlines the number "3" placed next to the statement "I am happy." If unhappy, chooses the opposite "troika". If the student feels neither happy nor unhappy, marks "0". If he feels that he is “almost happy”, he highlights “two”, if “rather happy than unhappy” - “one”.

It is very important that the teenager clearly understands that the answer should reflect the current state, and not how he overall assesses life satisfaction. It is critical that the student gives honest answers. This must be warned before starting the diagnostic procedure.

The study takes 10-15 minutes.

Data processing, calculation of results and their interpretation

For summarizing, use the upgraded scale, in which the most negative answer (“I am unhappy”) is rated 1 point, and the most positive (“I am happy”) is 7 points. The answer "+2", respectively, will cost 6 points, the answer "+1" - 5, "0" - 4, etc. At the same time, remember that in some questions the most negative option is located not on the right, but on the left, therefore prepare the key carefully.

In order to assess the student's well-being, sum up his scores received for answers to questions 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26. Activity is assessed on questions 3, 4, 9, 10, 15 , 16, 21, 22, 27, 28. The remaining ten questions help gauge the teen's current mood.

Divide the amount received in each category by 10. Thus, the maximum score in each category is 7, the minimum is 1. Valery Doskin wrote that a score above four indicates a favorable state of health of the subject. If the score is below four, then you should pay attention to it. If the score is below 2.5, it makes sense to have a separate conversation with the student. Perhaps the child needs urgent psychological help. However, it is important to remember that categories cannot be judged in isolation from each other. Let the low scores in the “well-being” category not cause you much anxiety if the teenager’s “mood” category is above four. This situation only means that the subject feels physically tired, but his psychological state is at a completely acceptable level.

This technique is a reliable and proven way to quickly and effectively assess the psychological state of students.

(Savchenko M.Yu. Career guidance. Personal development. - M., 2006.)

Instruction. You are invited to describe your condition using a table consisting of 30 polar signs. In each pair, you must choose the characteristic that most accurately describes your condition, and mark the number that corresponds to the degree (strength) of this characteristic.

Participants are given forms to fill out.

Full name ________ age ______ class _____ the date______

“+” features7 6 5 4 3 2 1 “-” features
1. Feeling good		Feeling bad
2. Feel strong		I feel weak
3. Active		Passive
4. Movable		Sedentary
5. Cheerful		Sad
6. Good mood		Bad mood
7. Workable		Broken
8. Full of strength		Exhausted
9. Fast		Slow
10. Active		Inactive
11. Happy		Unhappy
12. Cheerful
13. Relaxed		Tense
14. Healthy
15. Passionate		Indifferent
16. Caring		Indifferent
17. Enthusiastic
18. Joyful		Sad
19. Rested
20. Fresh		Exhausted
21. With a clear mind		Sleepy
22. Desire to work		Desire to rest
23. Calm		Excited
24. Optimistic		Pessimistic
25. Hardy		weary
26. Cheerful
27. It's easy to think		It's hard to think
28. Attentive		scattered
29. Full of hope		Disappointed
30. Satisfied		Dissatisfied

Data processing. When calculating, the extreme degree of severity of a positive sign is evaluated at 7 points the extreme severity of the negative sign is assessed in 1 point, average degree - in 4 points; don't forget the existence intermediate degrees, which are evaluated accordingly 6, 5, 3, 2 points. Points are grouped into three categories and the number of points for each of them is calculated:

well-being(sum of points on scales): 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26.

Activity(sum of points on scales): 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28.

Mood(sum of points on scales): 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30.

The results obtained for each category are divided by 10. The average score of the scale is 4. Estimates exceeding 4 points indicate a favorable condition of the subject. Ratings below 4 points indicate an unfavorable condition of the subject. Normal assessments of the state lie in the range of 5-6 points (the calculation is carried out on all three scales separately - well-being, activity, mood).

Note. This test can be used as soon as there is a need to find out the state of your health, activity, mood.

The study of the socio-psychological climate in the class team

Methodology "Psychological atmosphere in the team"(L.G. Zhedunova).

Purpose: to study the psychological atmosphere in the team.

Progress. Each student is invited to assess the state of the psychological atmosphere in the team according to a nine-point system. Polar qualities are evaluated:

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
	Friendliness	Hostility
	Agreement	disagreement
	Satisfaction	Dissatisfaction
	Passion	Indifference
	Efficiency	Inefficiency
	Warmth of relationship	The coldness of the relationship
	Cooperation	Lack of cooperation
	mutual support	Malevolence
	amusement
	success	failure

The higher the score, the higher the assessment of the psychological climate and vice versa. Analysis of the results involves subjective assessments of the state of the psychological climate and their comparison with each other, as well as the calculation of the average assessment of the atmosphere for the team.

Methodology "Our relationship"

(Friedman L.M. et al. Studying the personality of a student and student groups.-M., 1988.)

Purpose: to identify the degree of satisfaction of students with various aspects of the life of the team.

Progress. The student is asked to read six statements. It is necessary to write down the number of the statement that most of all coincides with his opinion. There may be an identification of various spheres of relationships between children in a team. For example, to study the mutual acceptability of each other (friendship, solidarity, or vice versa, conflict), a series of statements can be proposed:

Our class is very friendly and close-knit.

Our class is friendly.

There are no quarrels in our class, but everyone exists on his own.

There are sometimes quarrels in our class, but our class cannot be called conflict.

Our class is unfriendly, quarrels often arise.

Our class is very unfriendly. It's hard to study in such a class.

Another series of statements reveals the state of mutual assistance (or lack of it):

In our class, it is customary to help without being reminded.

In our class, help is provided only to our friends.

In our class, they help only when the student asks for it.

In our class, help is provided only when the teacher requires it.

In our class, it is not customary to help each other.

In our class they refuse to help each other.

Those judgments that are noted by the majority of students indicate the state of relationships and the atmosphere in the team. At the same time, the opinion of a particular student shows how he feels himself in the system of these relations.

The results of the study on the questionnaire "SAN"

Questionnaire SAN

This blank test is intended for the rapid assessment of well-being, activity and mood (the questionnaire is named after the first letters of these functional states).

The results of the pre-experimental study of the scale "Well-being"

As can be seen in the diagram (Fig. 1), there are no special differences in the dynamics of well-being before the start of the experiment. From this we can conclude that all three groups of subjects are in equal conditions before the start of the experiment.

The results of the pre-experimental study of the "Activity" scale

In general, activity (Fig. 2) is on the same level, except that they are slightly more active than the average group, which will take the course of training on the "Key". Again, it is clearly seen that all three groups are in the same conditions before the start of the experiment.

The results of the pre-experimental study of the scale "Mood"

On the “Mood” scale, it can be seen that in the control group, the background of mood (Fig. 3) is slightly elevated, relative to the “key” and “AT” groups. This can be explained by the influence of environmental factors, or the presence of some kind of irritant.

The results of the study group "AT" Table 1

test subject	Feeling good 1	Feeling good 2	Activity 1	Activity 2	Mood 1	Mood 2

Activity (Figure 5) also increased compared to pre-experimental measurements. This can be explained by the fact that the head of the MOB has changed, and this could play a role.

Setup1 & Setup2

The mood (Fig. 6) of the group after the classes improved significantly. Group cohesion tendencies are observed. The quarrelsomeness of the team has decreased, tolerance towards each other is observed.

Group results KEY. table 2

Feeling good 1	Feeling good 2	Activity 1	Activity 2	Mood 1	Mood 2

The results of an experimental study of the scale "Well-being"

It is clearly seen (Fig. 8) that from an average activity of 3.8 before the experiment, the activity after the classes increased to 5.6.

The results of an experimental study of the scale "Mood"

Setup1 & Setup2

The mood (Fig. 9) also has a positive trend from 4.0 to 5.3 after the classes, the group trained according to the "Key" system has a higher dynamics of positive shifts than the group trained according to the "AT" method

Instruction

You are invited to describe your current state using a table consisting of 30 pairs of polar signs. Choose in each pair the characteristic that most accurately describes your condition, and mark the number that corresponds to the severity of this characteristic.

Test

1	Feeling good	3	2	1	1	2	3	Feeling bad
2	Feel strong	3	2	1	1	2	3	I feel weak
3	Passive	3	2	1	1	2	3	Active
4	Sedentary	3	2	1	1	2	3	Mobile
5	Cheerful	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sad
6	Good mood	3	2	1	1	2	3	Bad mood
7	workable	3	2	1	1	2	3	Broken
8	Full of strength	3	2	1	1	2	3	Exhausted
9	Slow	3	2	1	1	2	3	Fast
10	Inactive	3	2	1	1	2	3	Active
11	Happy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Unhappy
12	Cheerful	3	2	1	1	2	3	Gloomy
13	Tense	3	2	1	1	2	3	Relaxed
14	Healthy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sick
15	Indifferent	3	2	1	1	2	3	Hooked on
16	Indifferent	3	2	1	1	2	3	Excited
17	Enthusiastic	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sad
18	Glad	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sad
19	Rested	3	2	1	1	2	3	Tired
20	Fresh	3	2	1	1	2	3	Exhausted
21	Sleepy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Excited
22	Desire to rest	3	2	1	1	2	3	A desire to work
23	Calm	3	2	1	1	2	3	preoccupied
24	Optimistic	3	2	1	1	2	3	Pessimistic
25	Hardy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Tired
26	Bouncy	3	2	1	1	2	3	Sluggish
27	It's hard to think	3	2	1	1	2	3	It's easy to think
28	scattered	3	2	1	1	2	3	Attentive
29	full of hope	3	2	1	1	2	3	Disappointed
30	Pleased	3	2	1	1	2	3	Dissatisfied

Thanks for answers!

The key to the test for diagnosing well-being, activity and mood (SAM)

Description

The test for diagnosing well-being, activity and mood (SAN) consists of 30 pairs of opposite characteristics, according to which the subject is asked to evaluate his condition. Each pair is a scale on which the subject notes the degree of severity of one or another characteristic of his condition.

Key to the test

When calculating, the extreme degree of expression of the negative pole of the pair is estimated at 1 point, and the extreme degree of expression of the positive pole of the pair is 7 points. At the same time, it should be taken into account that the poles of the scales are constantly changing, but positive states always receive high scores, and negative states always receive low ones. The points obtained are grouped according to the key into three categories, and the number of points for each of them is calculated.

Well-being - the sum of points on scales 1, 2, 7, 8, 13, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26.

Activity - the sum of points on scales 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 27, 28.

Mood - the sum of points on scales 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 23, 24, 29, 30.

The results obtained for each category are divided by 10. The average score of the scale is 4.

Result interpretation

Estimates greater than 4 points indicate a favorable state of the subject, below 4 - an unfavorable state. Normal state scores are in the range of 5.0–5.5 points. It should be noted that when analyzing the functional state, not only the values of individual indicators are important, but also their ratio.

Portal for the student. Self-training