Interestingly, it seems to me alone that such a solid world structure as the United Nations is hiding something from us? Or rather, it does not even hide, since this information is in plain sight, but simply does not finish speaking. Don't you see anything strange in the image of the emblem of this organization? Nothing confuses you and does not cause any associations? Now let's compare these images.

This is a picture of a flat earth and is exactly the same as the picture on the UN emblem. I hope all people with normal vision can see it perfectly. It turns out that on the emblem of this organization, which is considered a visible "face" and the official analogue of the "world government", our planet is clearly depicted as flat, and not in the form of a ball, as official science interprets.

That is, its emblem depicts exactly the same flat Earth, the hypothesis of which is officially considered a "delusion" and "pseudoscience". And all the official textbooks "for general use" convince us that the Earth is a spherical body. But why, then, does the UN use the flat Earth as its official emblem? And it's not just the UN. It is the same images that are on the emblems of some other organizations.

Maybe we are "not catching up" with something? I am not a supporter of the "flat earth" hypothesis, but when I read "100 proofs of a flat earth", I noticed that along with the obviously "far-fetched" among them there are those that, at least, make you think about do our textbooks really tell us the truth? Or maybe there is a science "for general use" and there is a science "for the elite"?

And then, don't the numerous "fighters against pseudoscience" want to say that the UN and other organizations using the flat Earth emblem are dumber than them, or are they deliberately trying to mislead people with the help of "pseudoscience" and "superstitions"? I am more inclined to think that they are simply hiding some information from us. And let everyone else think for themselves and with their own brains.

Hello, friends! What if you find out that there is no space, the earth is flat, there are several suns? NASA is funded by the secret world government, led by the Masons, to mislead everyone living on the planet. No one has been in space, the moon is artificial.

Isn't it shocking statements that at first glance seem like the ravings of a crazy ignoramus? But do not rush to twist your finger at the temple.

There is a considerable army of adherents, growing every day, for whom the theory of a flat earth is not nonsense or pseudoscientific fiction, but, on the contrary, seems to be the only truth.

Proponents of this theory conduct experiments, studies, provide hundreds of weighty evidence that we do not live on a geoid ball, spinning around its axis and rushing around the sun at a speed of 30 km per second, but on a flat "plate" covered with a transparent dome .

This topic is incredibly mind-boggling. A thousand and one questions immediately arise: how then do the oceans not pour out, why do we not see the sun at night, what about all these photos and videos of space expeditions, planets, moons, space suits, shuttles, moon rovers, satellites, astronauts? This is what the article will be about.

flat earth society

At school, we were taught that only ancient people believed in such fairy tales. Remember where you can find references to a flat earth? In Sumerian, Scandinavian, cosmogonic mythology, among the ancient inhabitants of Egypt, Babylon, Greece, in biblical legends, Vedic literature, in Hinduism and Buddhism.

This was all in antiquity, in the Middle Ages there were also followers of this theory. In our time, it is generally accepted that the earth has the shape of a ball, or rather, the shape of a geoid, and all ancient ideas are swept aside and recognized by modern science as absolutely untenable.

However, this does not mean that everyone safely abandoned the ancient treatises, forgot about the ideas of their ancestors and believed school textbooks. There is a so-called "Flat Earth Society". It originated in England in the 19th century with the light hand of the English inventor Samuel Rowbotham. He conducted various experiments and experiments, during which he saw what he wanted to see - the earth is flat.

Under the pseudonym Parallax, he wrote a small book called "Zethetic Astronomy", where he detailed the results of some of his experiments and evidence that the earth is not spherical, and the surface of the world's oceans is a flat plane.

For several years, the book was reprinted, each time the number of pages in it increased, as did the number of followers of Rowbotham's theory. Parallax himself conducted paid lectures, sometimes behaved aggressively, and was even able to attack those who dared to disagree with his point of view.

Followers appeared in America and Europe, the movement subsequently spread throughout the world. Hitler, by the way, was also an adherent of this theory. The most interesting thing is that there are more and more supporters of this idea, the society has broken up into several different movements and organizations.

It doesn't matter that many scientists empirically proved the truth of the statement that the earth is spherical, adherents of the "flat theory" do not pay attention to this and give their unshakable arguments. It is enough to type the appropriate query in the search engine and voila! A whole bunch of videos, facts, evidence, reasoning, rebuttals, forums, discussions on this topic.

But before moving on to describing the most common and similar arguments, let's look at the main postulates of the adherents of the flat earth theory:

• Imagine a disk in the center of which is the north pole, the diameter of the disk is a little more than forty thousand kilometers - this is our planet.
• The earth is covered with a transparent dome, above which the sun rotates and, like spotlights, this provides a change of day and night, gravity, in its usual representation, does not exist.
• There is no Antarctica, and instead of the South Pole, the edge of the earth, it is surrounded by an ice wall around its entire circumference.
• All photographs from space are fakes processed in Photoshop or other programs. Spaceships and other contraptions are made of cardboard and plywood, all space travels are filmed from fictional scenarios on earth.
• The dominant point of view about the sphericity of the earth is just a conspiracy sponsored by the Masons to hide the truth from the entire population of the planet.
• Everyone who knows the truth: scientists, NASA employees, astronauts are funded by Freemasons and are also participants in the conspiracy.

Does the solar system exist

Let's start with the idea of ​​​​the solar system, does it look like it was taught at school: in the center of the Sun, around which the planets revolve, the Earth takes third place. Could this be true? According to the adherents of the flat earth society, of course not.

Why? Everything is logical: such a model of the solar system could exist if the sun hung motionless in space, but this is not so, because everything moves in space. If everything were so, then the sun, according to the logic of things, should fly at great speed, and the planets should follow it and spin in a spiral, but this cannot be.

The second fact: the force of attraction and repulsion of the planets and the sun. The force of attraction allows the planets not to “fly away” from the sun, and the repulsive force allows them not to collide with each other and keep at a certain distance from the sun.

But the masses of the planets are different. And if the solar system would exist in the model that is described in books, then planets with a larger mass should be closer to the sun, and with a smaller mass further, since the force of attraction for small planets is required much less than for large ones.

Small planets simply would not have enough repulsive force if they were at such a relatively small distance. So, our planet would be located in sixth place (according to its mass) in a number of other planets and it would be unrealistically cold on earth.

Evidence and facts

We will not torment you and move on to the most interesting: the evidence and facts that adhere to the theory that the earth is a flat disk, not a spinning ball.

Does atmospheric pressure not exist?

Let's figure it out. Atmospheric pressure was discovered empirically by the physicist Evangelista Torricelli, who invented the mercury barometer. He experimented with mercury and water, thus refuting Aristotle's statement that there is no emptiness in nature, that is, there is no vacuum.

Torricelli proved that vacuum exists, and there is also atmospheric pressure, which presses on any body. But this trick doesn't work with water. Why did it turn out with mercury, it can also turn out with alcohol.

In fact, water barometers also exist, but they are very large, because it takes many times more water than alcohol or mercury to start evaporating. You can read more books or the internet about this experience. Yes, the question still arises, where did Torricelli get a whole bucket of mercury, which is thirteen times heavier than water, and even radioactive? But that is another story.

So, as the supporters of the flat-earth theory show us, in the case of Torricelli's experiment, no vacuum formed in the test tube, and the resulting apparent emptiness, in fact, just a vapor of mercury, which, at a minimum pressure at the very top of the inverted test tube, began to boil at room temperature. temperature. That is, it turns out that atmospheric pressure does not exist? And there is no gravitational force in the usual representation.

The space above the earth does not move anywhere, it becomes clear, adherents of the flat earth theory suggest looking at birds that fly freely, clouds that move depending on the direction of the wind.

And a helicopter or a balloon in general can hover motionless in the air and their pilots, according to the logic of things (well, if the earth is spherical and rotates) should see the moving earth under them, but this does not happen.

Then, even a stone thrown up and flying for a few seconds, then falling for a few seconds, should land many meters from the place of the throw, if the earth rotates, but this does not happen. Why? Because the earth is flat, the adherents of the anti-scientific theory answer.

Curvature of the earth beyond the horizon

Rowbotham began to conduct these experiments, in our time there are more of them, and they are diversified. If the earth is a sphere, then there is a curvature, and nothing should be visible beyond the horizon line. But in practice, such tall objects as lighthouses, mountains, statues are visible from such distances from which they should be significantly below the horizon line, and, therefore, should not be visible if the earth is spherical.

For example, the Needles lighthouse, located near Hampshire in the UK, whose height is 54 meters, is visible at a distance of up to 60 kilometers, and the curvature of the earth at this distance is 282 meters. It turns out that the point where the lighthouse is located should be 282 meters below the horizon line, if the earth is spherical. But this does not happen - the lighthouse is visible from such a distance.

The situation is the same with ships that are on the high seas, and we look at them from the shore. An illusion is created that moving away from the coast, the ship disappears beyond the horizon, which seems to confirm that the spherical earth has a bend.

However, if we take good equipment and adjust the magnifying zoom, the ship that "disappeared over the horizon" will reappear in our field of vision. That is, our vision is limited by the perspective dispersion point, and not by the horizon line. If you "arm the eye", then there will be no horizon line that limits visibility due to the curvature of the earth.

All photographs from space are a hoax, the sky is a dome, stars and the sun, and indeed the whole world is artificial. Airplane windows give the illusion of a rounded earth, but this is an optical illusion. Look at the UN coat of arms, isn't that a flat earth model?

Flying to the Moon: Truth or Big Deception

Supporters of the flat earth theory claim that the Americans have never been to the moon, for example, consider Apollo 11, on which the inhabitants of the earth allegedly made the first trip to the moon.

If you zoom in on the photo, you can see what the "lunar rover" is made of: oilcloth, cardboard, foil, plastic and other material that is by no means intended to overcome atmospheric pressure, and even more so travel into space.

Click to enlarge

This is just a mock-up photographed against the background of the astronauts, who are all freemasons without exception. In some photos, you can even see that on the fingers of the astronauts or on their wrists there are rings or watches with generally accepted Masonic symbols: a compass and a square, inside of which is the letter G.

Where are photos taken from Mars?

The situation is the same with photographs that were allegedly taken on Mars. Adherents of the "flat theory" argue that the images from Mars are actually just processed photographs of the earth's surface, taken in certain places.

Have you seen pictures from the Red Planet - a rocky lifeless place? The fact is that if you pass them through the Photoshop filter, it will become clear that in these pictures it’s quite a surface of the earth, over which the blue sky stretches. Such landscapes can be found in many regions of our planet.

Air routes

Using the flat earth theory, it is easy to explain some seemingly illogical air travel. For example, from Sydney () to Santiago (Latin America) it is convenient to fly directly with refueling, for example, in New Zealand. But in fact, the route passes through North America.

If you look at a round globe, it turns out that the plane in this case makes a strange angle. And if you transfer the same route to a flat earth map, you can see that this is a direct adequate path.

This can be checked on almost any route, applying which to a flat earth map, it becomes clear that such a flight path is very logical and adequate, which cannot be said about them when applied to a spherical model.

moon, sun, stars

The picture will be incomplete without understanding what is actually (or not really, but according to the adherents of the theory of flat earth) the moon, sun and stars. Here again we see the claim that all photographs "in the moon" are taken on earth.

The Flat Earth Society even conducts special expeditions, the purpose of which is to search for places on our planet where supposedly space photographs are taken. During such an expedition to Iceland in August 2015, they shot landscapes that are exactly the same as those pictures and videos that we are told that they were taken on the moon.

Astronauts participating in the Apollo program (recall that this was the first manned landing on the moon, which ended in 1975) one and all refused to swear on the Bible that they really were on the moon. Fragments of this video are easy to find on the Internet. Some of the astronauts swear, some avoid answering, some rudely send a journalist who asks to swear on the Bible about the reality of walking on the lunar surface.

We present you a video that proves that flying to the moon is a fiction:

If we collect all the arguments, add to them the data obtained as a result of observations by some alternative researchers, season the information received with knowledge about the flat earth and systematize the material, it turns out that the Moon is not a satellite of the earth, it does not exist in principle. How do we see it? This is a huge hologram hanging from above and periodically updated.

Now let's turn to the stars. It is known that astrology is the oldest science and many constellations, such as Ursa Major, were discovered thousands of years ago. And during this time, the constellations have not changed in any way. Isn't it strange if all the bodies in space are constantly moving at a huge different speed?

In addition, if the Earth is constantly rotating around its axis, and even around the sun, then why do we see the same stars above our heads on starry nights? After all, the earth turns to them in different directions, moreover, it flies around the sun, and the stars “stand” as if rooted to the spot in the same place. Doesn't this seem absurd? We don’t know about you, but it seems to supporters of the flat earth theory. They claim that stars are also holograms.

Now let's deal with the Sun. Is the sun also a hologram? There are many pictures, articles and videos that indicate the presence of not one, but many suns, and they "hang" in different parts above our earth and shine in different ways. There are even listings with brief descriptions of all seventeen suns, from California to Chinese. Of course, scientists will say that this is all nonsense. But let's see how the adepts who believe in a flat earth explain this.

The fact is that the sun cannot have such a color as we see it (from yellow to red). Indeed, according to the official theory, the blue color of the sky is due to the fact that the light of the sun, passing through the atmosphere, is divided into spectra and one of the spectra (blue-blue) colors the sky in this color. Why then does the sun itself appear yellow?

Since we see it through the atmosphere, it must also be colored blue, like the sky. Does this mean that we see the sun not through the atmosphere? The sun is not above the atmosphere, but much lower and it is not real? What is the result?

The earth has the shape of a disk and is located under a dome from which artificial hologram lamps shine: the moon, the sun, the stars. If it is interesting to delve into this topic, then books, videos, materials distributed by adherents of the flat earth theory are easy to find.

Closer to the light source - warmer

Everyone loves to give book evidence based on theory. but no one can answer the simplest question without books.

When we get closer to a heat source, we get hotter. Why is it colder at airplane altitude than on the ground? No, do not write about the temperatures of a certain layer of the atmosphere, you still take it again from books and did not check it yourself.

Let's in fact - closer to the heat source - warmer. Those. closer to the sun should be warmer. But this is not actually the case. This suggests that the heat source is false. It must be much hotter in space than on earth in direct sunlight.

False Map of the World (addition)

We supplement this article with new information, which we have taken out in a separate review due to its volume.

- the article clearly considers the sizes of the continents, which are shown by the official source - Yandex.Maps and which strongly contradict the world map that we have known since childhood.

Finally, I would like to point out that all information for the article was prepared and collected from free sources, the purpose of the article is not to persuade readers to one point of view or another. All material is for informational purposes only and we are interested in what you think about the theory of a flat earth. Which evidence seems to be the most weighty, and which is sucked from the finger?

Leading Russian NUMEROLOGIST JULIE PO about the dome and flat earth

Irrefutable evidence of a flat earth - VIDEO film:

Scientists have proven that the Earth is NOT round - VIDEO facts

VOTE - Which Earth?

Article in video format

Share the article with friends, discuss, subscribe to our updates, and we say to you: "see you" and go in search of new secrets of the universe.

We will be glad to hear your opinion on the topic of flat earth in the comments.

It hurts to see today's rampant diabolism, which is the work of perverts! Unfortunately, the word "revelry" is not even quite appropriate. Now comes the real one psychic attack on the minds of the Russians. In general, this is the real mental warfare! In this article, I will not talk about the propaganda of pederasty in Russia and the world and about the widespread revelry of the so-called "homosexuals" in the form of gay parades, although this is also one of the powerful factors in the mental war of the "devil's seed" against humanity.

Here I want to point out how powerfully, literally as a united front, the "children of the devil" act in their desire to turn the brains of everyone who has very poorly developed thinking and weak logics in reasoning.

This new mental attack is designed primarily for such weak-minded people. Everyone else, listening to this literally devilish logic they just twist their fingers to their heads and think that all these "lecturers-propagandists" are just crazy. And they, in fact, are not schizos, they are very smart people for evil, and their main goal now is to check how many suggestible people are in our society, and how many can be introduced with the help of such mental attacks into a state of schizophrenia per hour. X!

So, watch and listen for yourself! This information has already been removed from the Internet by Boyarshinov Boris Sergeevich, preserved in the Yandex archive:

.

Today professor of physical and mathematical sciences Boyarshinov Boris Sergeevich explains to students that scientists have blatantly lied to people before, including him, saying that the Earth has the shape of a ball. According to him, the truth is that the earth is flat!

Obvious-unbelievable?!

The 21st century is in the yard, every sailor or astronaut knows that the Earth has a spherical shape, and this scientist is trying to convince everyone that the Earth is flat, as Catholics in the Holy Roman Empire did in the Middle Ages, being opponents of the heliocentric system?!

If only one Boyarshinov claimed this! In this case, one could say that the person went crazy in his old age! What a mind has gone for his mind!

However, dozens of other "agents of influence" who are in our field of vision and actively use the mass media assert the same thing today!

Look at the next representative of the "children of the devil" sect - Andrey Tyunyaev, Russian writer and journalist, editor-in-chief of the socio-political newspaper "President", founder of the non-profit organization "Organismika Academy of Fundamental Sciences".

Hear what he has to say about the shape of the earth! Andrei Tyunyaev explains that in fact it is not flat, but has the shape of a saucer with edges turned up, but it seems to people that it is flat due to the phenomenon of refraction in the Earth's atmosphere. This is the real form of the Earth according to Tyunyaev!

Tyunyaev A.A., The Book of Ra: the origin of letters, numbers and symbols. — M.: White Alvy. — 2014.
Tyunyaev A. A., Russian China: the export of civilization. — M.: White Alvy. 2014.
Tyunyaev A.A., Dikusar V.V., Vacuum: concept, structure, properties // Otv. ed. corresponding member RAS Yu. A. Flerov. - M .: Computing Center. A. A. Dorodnitsyna RAS. — 2013.
Tyunyaev A.A., Moscow - the halls of Mokosha. — M.: White Alvy. — 2011.
Tyunyaev A.A., Ancient Russia. Svarog and Svarog's grandchildren. — M.: White Alvy. 2010.
Klyosov A. A. and Tyunyaev A. A., The origin of man (according to archeology, anthropology and DNA genealogy). — M.: White Alvy. 2010.
Parent language: Experience of reconstruction. (Coll. auth.). — M.: White Alvy. T. 1. 2009.
Tyunyaev A. A. Periodic system of elementary particles // Organisms - the fundamental basis of all sciences. Volume III, Physics / Ed. d.f.-m. n., Professor O. A. Khachaturian. — M.: Sputnik+, 2009.
Tyunyaev A. A. Syndrome of homeological-chromosomal immunodeficiency // Organisms - the fundamental basis of all sciences. Volume III, Medicine / Ed. b. n., Professor O. D. Doronina. — M.: Sputnik+, 2009.
Tyunyaev A. A. The history of the emergence of world civilization (system analysis). - M .: 2006-2009.
Evolutionary Economics: Innovations, Investments, Institutions, Intellectual Capital: A Collective Monograph". Under the scientific editorship of N. A. Shaidenko and M. P. Pereverzev. - Tula: Publishing House of the Tula State Pedagogical University named after L. N. Tolstoy, 2008 - 460 C, section 1, paragraph 1.5., pp. 104-113.
Tyunyaev A. A. Languages ​​of the world (textbook). - M .: In, 2007-2008.
Tyunyaev A. A. Organism is the fundamental basis of all sciences. Volume I. - M .: In, 2004, 368 p.
Tyunyaev A. A. Organisms - a new fundamental science. Started. — M.: In, 2003, 80 p.
Fiction[edit | edit wiki text]
Tyunyaev A. A. Battle for the Throne of the World (Gospel of Yarila). Novel. - M .: White Alvy, 2014. - S. 575: ill. ISBN 978-5-91464-104.
Tyunyaev A. A. Tales from the library of Ivan the Terrible. - M .: White Alvy, 2015. - S. 288: ill. ISBN 978-5-91464-124-9.

Capitals of the World, 2007, 978-5-98034-100-8;
"From writing to the Internet", 2007, 5-98034-075-0;
Little Red Riding Hood, 2007, 5-98034-093-9;
"ABC, counting, colors, notes", 2006, 5-98034-098-X;
"Home alphabet", 2006, 5-98034-089-0;
"Automotive alphabet", 2006, 5-98034-096-3;
"Flower meadow", 2006, 5-98034-071-8;
"Antarctic Account", 2006, 5-98034-085-8;
"ABC of animals and birds", 2005, 5-9640-0262-5; 5-9640-0223-4; 2004, 5-96400069-X;
"Merry Geometry", 2005, 5-98034-046-7;
"All about water", 2005, 5-98034-067-X;
"Magic Flight", 2005, 5-98034-069-6; 5-98034-022-X;
"In the park", 2005, 5-98034-043-2;
"Sea counting rhyme", 2005, 5-98034-073-4;
"We play ball", 2005, 5-98034-037-8; 5-98034-044-0;
"Account with animals", 2005, 5-98034-061-0;
“Who has what baby”, 2005, 5-98034-054-8;
"Fruits, berries, mushrooms", 2005, 5-98034-036-X;
"ABC of Names", 2004, 5-98034-058-0;
"Who eats what", 2004, 5-98034-053-X;
"Rules of traffic", 2004, 5-98034-059-9;
"Colors", 2004, 5-98034-051-3;
"Color Geometry", 2004, 5-98034-066-1;
"ABC of Candy", 2003, 5-98034-046-7;
"Birthday of a tiger cub", 2003, 5-98034-041-6;
"Mouse's birthday", 2003, 5-98034-031-9;
"Jungle", 2003, 5-98034-018-1;
"What kind of water is", 2003, 5-98034-011-4;
"Cosmos", 2003;
“Who lives in the forest”, 2003, 5-98034-026-2;
“Who is wearing what”, 2003, 5-98034-025-4;
"Forest Tale", 2003, 5-98034-019-X;
"Machines", 2003, 5-98034-049-1;
"Sea Tale", 2003, 5-98034-024-6;
"Musical Instruments", 2003, 5-98034-009-2; 2002;
“I will draw”, 2003, 5-98034-008-4; 2002.
"Locomotive and his family", 2003, 5-98034-048-3;
Feathered Friends, 2003, 5-98034-012-2;
"Learning to speak", 2003, 5-94582-033-4;
Formula 1, 2003, 5-98034-038-6;
"Flower meadow", 2003, 5-98034-023-8;
"Chocolate", 2003, 5-98034-010-6;
"Frog", 2002;
"Fish", 2002;
"Spider bugs", 2002.

Another "agent of influence", a representative of the devilish forces, but already a female, - Julie Poe.

Listen now as she delivers to the audience flat earth theory:

Julia Poe explains that the distance from the observer's eyes to the Sun is not 150 million kilometers, as it is written in all encyclopedic reference books, but only 6 thousand kilometers! That is, the distance from us to the Sun is like from Murmansk to Vladivostok! Just!

About what it is psychic attack goes to the brains of the Russians, I realized back in April of this year, when I received such a "friendly" letter from a kont user with the nickname "Stone", living in Germany:

“I’m actually a writing person, I used to do this. With age and experience, I can say that today I already see almost the entire picture of the universe as a whole, I keep it in a single field of vision, many times I tried to write the most valuable book in our time, I have a lot of information and knowledge in all spheres of life, but ... not for anyone and there is no need!

Pinch the article for one topic, then for another—not that calico. Information should be presented as in the book of the Apocalypse - absolutely brilliant and divine. This is the word of God himself! Several layers and levels of understanding. In Revelation, after all, the entire history of mankind for 2000 years and a little earlier, as well as for the next 1000 years. From the state structure, to the legal system and the socio-political status of all survivors after the 7th trumpet...

Explaining Revelation can take up to dozens of volumes! And the people are not ready now. Maximum spiritual level—this is a belief in some kind of higher mind, and then even film planets, akkunaki, etc. Nobody knows God. And God knows no one! All in the matrix up to the nostrils.

I'm leaving Comte too—nefig throw beads. And I recommend you to deal with the issue of flat earth—a lot of information, only a lot of stuffing—you need to be able to weed out. Education allows—technical. I also have a mathematical mindset and with physics, astronomy and chemistry az on "you".

You can't even imagine what kind of lies and matrix we live in! globalism—it's from the globe. At first they said that there is a globe and a heliocentric, they fooled, in connection with this they said that there is no God and began to control the cattle. And "they" know what's what! Now that there is no God—and everyone is "in the know", they discovered the truth about the flat earth, but they already say that the film planets created us and they say they will soon arrive to deal with the mess. Wait—you will see how interesting it will be. Okay, I'm sorry..."

In vain he wrote "about a flat Earth" to me, a former sailor who spent 20 years on ships on the seas and oceans! For those who saw the sea not in candy wrappers, the spherical earth is the very evidence! Therefore, even in ancient times, they tried to draw sea charts in such a way that the sphericity of the Earth was reflected as much as possible:

The last card is completely unique! First, it is dated 140 AD. It was compiled by the famous Ptolemy! Secondly, she demonstrates non-flat earth! Thirdly, this map shows that there was more water at the equator than in the circumpolar region, which is now heavily flooded by the waters of the Arctic Ocean. Obviously, the polar region went under water, which destroyed Hyperborea (indicated on this map, by the way) and gave rise to the legend of the "global flood". Pay attention to the outlines of India! Now they are different. Fourthly, the current Kola Peninsula was not a peninsula then! Well, and so on.

As an application article:

"Think about it! Lack of spirituality fights with spirituality! The task is to corrupt as many people as possible!"

It is hardly possible to reveal the incomprehensible secrets of the universe to the end. And even what at first glance seems to be an indisputable truth, in some cases can be very controversial. for the sake of political, economic, moral and ethical interests, it is no longer such a surprise, because the concept of alternative history is becoming more and more adherents every day. And even those who until recently believed in fairy tales about the existence of Peter I, today are no longer so confident in supporting their beliefs.

And what if not only history is distorted? Modern geography, geodesy and other sciences have elevated the idea that the Earth is round to the rank of axiom, but this theory also has its opponents. At first glance, the idea of ​​a flat Earth can be perceived as a joke, only its adherents are providing more and more convincing evidence in favor of their theory, which looks quite logical and reasonable. Is this true, or is science not lying in this case? Who knows…

Flat Earth Theory: Basic Concepts

The essence of this theory reveals its very name. According to flat earthers, the globe is a circular disk centered on the North Pole. But in principle, there is no South Pole on this map - instead of it there is a high ice wall that encircles the territory of the Earth. What lies behind this wall is a mystery. Some suggest that behind it there is only ice and permafrost, others believe that there is a parallel life of other inhabitants of the planet hiding there, while others believe that the wall serves as a fence behind which there is absolutely nothing. A map that visually reflects the device of a flat Earth is called azimuthal.

The diameter of the planet is 40,000 kilometers. Above this huge disk, like a dome, the constellations, the Sun and the Moon rise. And so that the day goes on as usual, and the day turns into night, it is not the planet itself that rotates, but the dome located directly above it. That is why the constellations move during the night, the bright sun is replaced by a mysterious and cold moon, and sunrise and sunset alternate regularly.

And since the Sun is constantly moving, then the usual ideas about the solar system have no right to exist. In principle, the Solar system is not considered in the Flat Earth concept, since the rotation of the Sun is carried out at a frantic speed, and the planets simply could not follow it and rotate about their own axis. The force of attraction of the planets also acts as a weighty argument. According to modern scientists, the Earth ranks third among the planets located around the Sun. That's just according to the laws of physics, the force of attraction is directly related to the mass, which means that the smaller the size of the planet, the closer it should be to the Sun. Having carried out simple mathematical calculations, one can understand that the Earth should not be in third, but in sixth place. Then our world would be shrouded in permafrost, because the atmosphere simply physically could not warm up enough to comfortably sustain life.

But if everything is arranged exactly as the adherents of the Flat Earth theory see it, what about space flights, numerous photographs of the Earth taken from outer space, data on other planets and other information that clearly demonstrates the structure of the universe. According to the flat earthers, all this is nothing more than a fiction, a staging and a fraud on a huge scale. The illusion created by the Freemasons allows you to hide the truth from the population. One of the proofs of this assumption is the picture of Apollo 11, in which the Americans allegedly flew to the moon. With a detailed magnification, you can see that the spacecraft is made of "improvised materials" - foil, planks, oilcloth, cardboard, etc. In fact, this is just a scenery intended for filming astronauts, who, by the way, did not even bother to remove jewelry (bracelets and rings), on which an engraved letter G is visible inside a compass and square - a symbol of the Masonic movement.

What about pictures of Mars? The unreal and mysterious beauty of this mysterious planet, according to the adherents of the Flat Earth theory, is nothing more than photo filters, the play of light and shadows, classic computer programs that any “advanced” schoolboy can work with. If you remove the effects of Photoshop from these pictures, you get very beautiful, but still very real landscapes, taken in remote corners of the Earth, untouched by human hand.

A bit of history, or where does the flat earth theory come from?

At first glance, it may seem that the theory of the flat shape of our planet is nothing more than a fashion trend, of which there are now quite a few on the Internet. However, this is not at all the case: peering through the prism of history, one can track how opinions about the shape of the Earth have changed. The mention of this theory was found in the ancient mythology of Egypt and Babylon, Hindu and Buddhist scriptures, and the Scandinavian epic. And even the ancient philosophers, whose teachings are considered a historical legacy, including Leucippus and his student Democritus, were firmly convinced that the Earth is flat. The same idea was held in the oldest manuscript of the Book of Enoch, found in Qumran. However, over time, these beliefs gave way to astronomical knowledge, and the idea of ​​a Flat Earth sunk into oblivion.

In the Middle Ages, the question of the shape of the Earth again became discussed. One of the clearest examples of this idea was the "Christian Topography" written by Cosmas Indikoples in 535-547. In it, the planet is presented in the form of a rectangular plane, on top of which there is a dome: “Some people, hiding behind the name of Christians, argue, along with pagan philosophers, that the sky has a spherical shape. No doubt these people are deluded by the eclipses of the Sun and Moon.” This work in translation was widely used in Russia, because at that time it was a unique encyclopedia of medieval knowledge, which there was no reason not to believe.

One illustrative example of the theory was an engraving published in the book "Atmosphere: Popular Meteorology", published by the French astronomer Camille Flammarion in 1888. It depicts a pilgrim who has reached the edge of the Earth and looks out from under the dome towards new worlds. The caption for the image reads: "A medieval missionary says he found the point where the sky touches the Earth."

How was the Flat Earth Society formed?

In the 19th century, adherents of the described concept united in a group - the Flat Earth Society - headed by the English scientist Samuel Rowbotham. For several decades, he conducted all kinds of experiments, experiments, studies in support of his theory and, importantly, found a lot of evidence. Using the pseudonym Parallax, he wrote "Zethetic Astronomy", in which he thoroughly and clearly outlined all his achievements and results that refute the spherical shape of the planet. Initially, Rowbotham's small work was reprinted several times, becoming more and more large-scale and evidence-based literature, because it was constantly supplemented by students of the Society. Until his death, Samuel Rowbotham defended his theory, holding numerous lectures and seminars around the world.

Adherents of Rowbotham's theory subsequently united in the Universal Zethetic Society, which found its adherents in all corners of the planet. Since 1956, this organization, headed by Samuel Shenton, has again become known as the Flat Earth Society, but with the significant prefix "International". When Shenton saw photographs of the globe from orbit, he never doubted his beliefs for a moment: "It is easy to see how photographs of this sort can fool the uninformed."

Since 1971, the head of the organization has been Charles Johnson. He launched a major campaign to promote his ideas, handing out leaflets, pamphlets and booklets, in which he defended the flat earth model. Thanks to such activity, during his leadership, the number of supporters of the theory has increased several times.

Arguments in favor of the flat earth theory

In order to make an informed decision about the shape of our planet, one should consider the arguments of both sides, finding out which of them is the most reasonable and consistent. So what do flat earthers say about their theory?

1.The speed of the earth's rotation.

Scientific data says that the Earth rotates around its axis at a speed of about half a kilometer per second. It's hard to even imagine such a fast object! In favor of the flat earthers are a few simple experiments, for example, with a jump. Everyone knows that, having jumped, a person lands in the same place. But what about rotation? After all, in those fractions of a second that he was in a jump, the planet had to move a considerable distance, and another point would become the landing site. The same result gives a shot from a cannon into the sky. In addition, if you shoot to the east (against the direction of rotation), the core should fly twice less than the norm, and if to the west - twice as much. However, this does not happen. And the pilots flying over the Earth have never registered how it rotates, although who, if not them, should be able to see the change in the position of the planet from above.

2.Perfectly flat horizon.

Look into the distance. Look carefully, not losing sight of the slightest detail. What do you see? The standard flat edge of the horizon in the area where it is clearly visible - fields, meadows, sea surface - cannot deceive. After all, in a free area, the view spans several kilometers in the distance, so why are they perfectly even? According to the adherents of the theory, the answer is obvious - the Earth is flat! In addition, tall objects (for example, towers, lighthouses, mountain peaks) would simply not be visible, because the spherical surface covered them from the attentive eye, since the horizon line would be much higher. But this does not happen, and you can admire the mountains from a very long distance, numbering more than one kilometer.

3.Air routes.

Many flights, especially long-distance flights, at first glance seem illogical from the point of view of the sphericity of the Earth. Looking at the globe, one may wonder why pilots choose such, at first glance, illogical route and inconvenient points for refueling. However, there is no mystery and irrationality in this: if you compare these routes with a flat map, it becomes clear that the route is laid perfectly.

4. Star drawing.

If all objects in the Universe are in constant motion, then why are the stars in the sky located exactly the same way both today and several centuries ago. Indeed, in theory, the star pattern should change, if not every day, then once a week for sure. However, this does not happen. The thing is that the stars are just holograms on the celestial dome, which cannot change, move relative to each other, and even more so fall. And the famous meteor shower, which all the romantics of the world are looking forward to, to make a wish, is a holographic effect.

5. The yellow color of the sun.

The scientific laws explain quite extensively why the sky is blue and the Sun is yellow. According to official data, ultraviolet passing through the atmosphere is scattered into spectra, one of which colors the sky canvas. However, this does not explain in any way why a part of the rays concentrated around the Sun does not break up, because then it should be blue-blue. Isn't it because the Sun is below the dome-sky, which limits the space. Rotating around the Earth, it alternately illuminates the territory, so the light hours regularly replace each other.

6. Space flights are a hoax.

None of the flat earthers have seen outer space with their own eyes, which means that its existence can be disputed to the point of hoarseness. Photos are fake, videos are solid special effects, and space flights are fantastic stories. Convinced adherents of this theory even organized several times an investigation expedition to find places for photography "on the Moon". And when the astronauts were asked to swear on the Holy Scriptures that they were on the moon, they all showed aggression and evaded the answer.

7. Free flow of rivers.

According to the law of communicating vessels, the network of reservoirs enveloping the Earth simply could not exist on a spherical planet in the form in which we see it today. However, the rivers flow to the west, east, north and south in almost equal numbers, and their depth and full flow are in no way connected with the geographical position. Such characteristics are possible only if the Earth is flat.

8. View of technicians.

One of the weighty arguments in favor of their theory, flat earthers use the universal conspiracy of engineers, technicians and other personalities, one way or another connected with work in vast spaces. For example, surveyors do not take into account the curvature of the Earth when designing buildings and structures. But in this case, the building, made according to this project, simply could not withstand the total load and collapsed. However, this does not happen, and the buildings stand idle for decades. There is only one conclusion: they are aware that the Earth is actually flat, but they keep this secret from the population. The same applies to aircraft pilots who, when taking off from a spherical surface, no longer correct their flight path until landing. How? After all, under such conditions, the plane would have flown into outer space. And if you look at it from the point of view of a flat Earth, everything falls into place.

This evidence is the most common evidence that the Flat Earth Society uses to refute a generally accepted theory. To judge their fidelity, one must also consider the beliefs of the so-called "ballooners", who adhere to a scientific point of view.

Why is the Earth a sphere? Flat Earth Arguments

The concept that the scientific community adheres to has many justifications in its favor, some of which look quite convincing. What are the ballers talking about in favor of their theory?

1. Moon and its eclipse.

Even if we do not take into account photographs that prove the existence of the Moon as a satellite of our planet, the shadow that the Earth casts, gradually reaching a lunar eclipse, directly indicates its sphericity. Even Aristotle, who supported the spherical nature of the planet, considered the cast shadow as an oval, which directly contradicted the theory of the flat shape of the Earth.

2.Constellation change.

This argument was also considered as early as the time of Aristotle. Traveling around the world, he recorded the position of the stars in the sky and the visibility of each of them. So, being at the equator, constellations were opened to him, which were not visible in other latitudes. And the farther from the equator the scientist was, the less familiar stars he saw, which were replaced by others. This effect could only be explained by the fact that a person looks at the sky from a spherical surface, otherwise the location would not have such a strong effect on the visibility of the stars.

3.Time Zones.

And although half-Earths claim that the change of time of day occurs due to the rotation of the Sun, balloonists are sure that it is the Earth that rotates around its axis. That is why different times are set in different countries, and when, for example, it is deep night in America, the sun is shining in China, and the day is in full swing.

4. Force of gravity.

Another proof of a spherical planet is gravity - the force of attraction between objects. According to the laws of physics, it acts relative to the center of mass. But after all, when falling, the apple lands from top to bottom, and not at an angle to the center, and a person, walking along the surface of the Earth, feels attraction to the bottom, and not sideways, closer to the center of the “disk”. That is why it can be judged that under it every time there is the center of the Earth, from which the maximum gravity comes, which means that the Earth has a spherical shape. However, flat earthers reject this evidence because they believe that gravity is just the result of the planet's upward movement with an acceleration of 9.8 m/s2.

5.Visibility of objects from a height.

If you climb a mountain, a tall tree or a lighthouse, looking at the outlines of the horizon through binoculars, you will notice that the visibility distance increases in direct proportion to the height at which the person is located. Of course, visible obstacles can interfere with the purity of the experiment, but in a field or meadow, this effect is most noticeable. But if the Earth were flat, the height of the observation platform would have no effect on the visibility of objects on the horizon. This is possible only if the planet has the shape of a ball.

6. ship on the horizon.

When sailing, the ship does not immediately disappear on a perfectly flat sea surface. First of all, its hull is lost from sight, and only after that the sails disappear over the horizon. The same thing is observed when it approaches the shore: sails are immediately visible, and only then - the ship itself. This directly proves that, despite the apparent straightness of the horizon, it is curved by the spherical shape of the Earth.

7.Sundial.

The sundial effect is calculated based on the shadow cast by the Sun at different times. By sticking a stick into the ground, you can observe how the shadow from it gradually changes its shape. And if the world were a plane, the position of the wand would not affect the shape of the shadow, and at different points it would be identical. However, even a seemingly insignificant distance of several tens of kilometers between two experimental rods gives a different result, and the shadows differ by at least a few tenths of a millimeter. This principle was used even before our era when calculating the circumference of the Earth, which was carried out by Eratosthenes.

8. documentary facts.

And although flat earthers claim that photographs from satellites and space flights are a hoax, balloonists are firmly convinced of their existence. Numerous images of our planet obtained from outer space, flights to the Moon and exploration of other planets are the scientific heritage that humanity has achieved over hundreds of years of experiments and developments. True, considerable funds are invested in these studies, and their effectiveness is confirmed only by photographs, but this is already the other side of the coin.

Flat Earth in the context of contemporary art

No matter how controversial the theory that denies the generally accepted shape of our planet, it has repeatedly surfaced in the works of science fiction writers, filmmakers and writers. One need only recall the well-known Chronicles of Narnia by Clive Lewis to understand that this idea appeals to a wide audience. The cosmology of Narnia presents the idea of ​​the plane of the Earth, beyond which lies paradise - Aslan. The heroes go there, following the routes of an old map, reminiscent of a medieval one.

The English science fiction writer Terry Pratchet devoted a whole series of works to the concept with the predictable name Discworld. According to him, based on ancient Indian myths, four elephants support the disk-shaped planet, and those, in turn, stand on a centuries-old turtle. And what about Pirates of the Caribbean, beloved by a multimillion-dollar crowd of spectators? Captain Jack Sparrow's team managed to reach the end of the planet, where a bottomless waterfall was seething.

This concept was not bypassed by domestic writers. So, the story "The Monk at the End of the Earth" by Sergei Sinyak describes an expedition to the heavenly dome, after which its participants were subjected to repression by the state. However, the results of the expedition were undeniable: flight into space is nothing more than a fiction based on a distortion of the picture of the universe.

Afterword

What to believe, what concept to adhere to is a personal matter for everyone. It is more convenient for some to believe that the Earth is a ball, while others are also unshakably convinced that our planet is flat. One way or another, it is not possible for most people to go up into space in order to visually verify the correctness of one of these movements, so we will have to use what we have - eyes, logic and common sense. It is enough to close textbooks, open a satellite map and drive a considerable distance along it, checking the mileage and trajectory with official data. Simple practical experiments will allow you to understand where reality ends and hoax begins.

It is best to end this argument with the words of the wisest Dalai Lama: “Anyway, all this is very insignificant, isn't it? The basis of the Doctrine is; what they say about the structure of life, about the nature of suffering, about the nature of the mind. This is the foundation of the teaching. This is what matters most; that is directly related to our lives. Whether the world is square or round does not matter much as long as prosperity and peace reign in it.

In our world, the unity of opposites, there are many conflicting theories, including the theory of a flat earth. There is even an international society with that name. In the modern world, such a theory, contrary to conventional scientific opinion about the sphericity of the earth, began to take shape in the nineteenth century thanks to the bold statements of Samuel Rowboth. Despite the fact that the final evidence (if there is such a thing) confirming the sphericity, sphericity or flattening of our planet will not change anything in the lives of the people living on it, this issue is becoming more and more discussed. On this occasion, conferences are held where the activists of the "flat earth" provide various evidence in defense of their theory.

Latest videos:

Evidence 2019

Among the arguments given to debunk the idea that the earth is spherical, the following are of interest. So, according to the defenders of the flat earth theory, it is such because:

1. the bend of the horizon is not visible;
2. there is no convincing exhaustive evidence that the planet Earth has a spherical, more precisely spherical shape;
3. photographs from space can easily be the result of work in Photoshop;
4. even from an airplane, the earth's surface looks flat;
5. quite likely there are conspiracy theories and hiding the plane of the earth is one of the tasks of the conspirators, and the emblem of the UN (alleged conspirators) clearly illustrates the map of the flat earth;
6. the ship gradually disappearing behind the horizon line, leaving for the open sea (ocean), simply moves away from the observer and visually decreases in size until it becomes completely indistinguishable, and not the earth is round, but the lens of the human eye;
7. to Antarctica, which in fact, according to the "flat theory" in the form of the earth's pole, was closed to the public back in 1959 so that the deception would not be revealed;
8. the outline of the month that we see in the sky is explained by the spherical shape of the sun and moon, and not the earth: when the sun shines on the moon below it, a shadow creeps onto the night star;
9. the moon is also not a natural creation, but an artificial one, because it has its own source of light inside, otherwise (if the moon was illuminated by the sun) it would have a round glare;
10. if you want to make a "round the world" trip, thanks to the only existing north pole, a north-pointing compass will make you move in a circle, and according to the classical theory of the earth, supposedly on the surface of a ball;
11. when you are surrounded by spherical bodies (for example, the sun and the moon), this does not mean that you are also on a spherical body (example: balls on a billiard ball);
12. the change of day and night is most easily explained by such a hidden truth: the sun moves over the surface of a flat earth in a circle, so the illuminated part of the earth is in the “day” state, and the unlit part is in the “night” state (the same principle works to explain the warm and cold weather throughout the year)
13. the concepts of polar night and polar day exist only for the north pole (this happens only when the sun predominantly flies over this area), and due to the complete inaccessibility of the south pole (see item number 7 of this list), no one can see such a phenomenon in this area;
14. many influential people (including the elite clergy in the person of the richest man of our time, Patriarch Kirill) periodically discover an urgent need to go on an honorary mission to Antarctica, where the path of “mere mortals” is completely closed (an example of this is Kirill’s visit to that area on February 18, 2016, President Obama in March of the same year, US Secretary of State John Kerry, who over the course of a couple of days signed an agreement at the North Pole in November 2016 banning "unauthorized persons" from entering there for fishing);
15. the sun decreases when moving to the east, when you watch the sunset, because it moves away from you, and in the case when it goes beyond the horizon line large (in some conditions this can be easily observed), it simply hides behind the unevenness of the earth, since the flat it is only under general consideration;
16. the imperfection of our vision allows the brain to mislead that an object receding from us seems to “leave the horizon”, that is, it disappears behind it (however, this is not the case; the role of the horizon was the phone, then with a sufficiently good focus you will be able to notice that a person is actually still visible beyond this horizon.

Is the earth round or flat?

Above were parts of the theory of "flat earthers", which should prove to everyone that our planet is still not a flattened ball in its shape. What can I say, some of them (if not all) can really convince a person who does not want to figure everything out on their own. However, one should not think that each of them took into account all the laws of physics and other related sciences. A theory can always be presented in such a way that some indisputable, spoiling facts remain "behind the scenes", that is, in the shadows, like some of the regions of the earth during the onset of a phenomenon called "night".

The problem is that for people of one mindset, some thoughts, observations or conclusions will look like real facts, and others for another mindset or way of thinking. Since it is always possible to find “pitfalls” or “inconsistencies” in any theory, and also due to the impossibility of covering all the facts of life by one specific person, each of the theories has the right to exist, but there will always be someone who will see new and obvious for others facts for him.

It turns out that any scientific or pseudoscientific dispute is nothing more than a game of arguments and facts, which, upon special consideration, is our whole life, so no one can say with certainty that the earth is flat. However, it is worth noting that the same thought cannot convince an individual and actually prove to him that the earth is round, although for the vast majority of people this explanation looks the most natural today.

Here are some final memes for you: