Many people do not see the difference in which verb to use in a particular context - "to put on" or "to put on." Many even believe that any rules, explanations and clarifications are not needed at all. In their opinion, “putting on a hat” or “putting on a hat” sounds different, but the result will still be the same.
Dictionary Ushakov about the verbs "dress" and "put on"
In Ushakov's "Explanatory Dictionary" the following explanations of the verb "dress" are given:
- To clothe - to clothe someone or something in some kind of clothing. For example: "Dress the artists in fancy dress."
- To dress means to cover or wrap something for warmth. For example, dress a horse with a blanket, dress a sick person with a blanket.
- In a figurative sense, “to dress” means to envelop, cover, envelop. Examples are figurative expressions-metaphors: "Winter covered the whole earth with snow" or "Trees dressed the clearing with lacy shadows."
- To dress in wide to provide someone with clothes, to help in acquiring all kinds of robes. For example: "So she tried to dress her family, that she worked tirelessly."
About the verb "put on" Ushakov writes:
- Put on - pull, cover, pull on clothes, a piece of clothing or a blanket, blanket, fabric in order to hide from the cold, rain or wind, or hide, hide nakedness. Examples: “Since it’s raining, don’t forget to put on a hood!”, “A smart girl put on a net - and she became not naked and not in clothes!”
- To put on is to put something on something. “Petrovich put the duck on a skewer - and on the fire it, let it blush better!”
Figurative meaning of the verb "put on"
Some linguists argue that the word "put on" is not as ambiguous as its counterpart "dress". Like, it defines only specific actions, but in a figurative sense it is impossible to use it.
However, this is not entirely true. The verb "put on" can serve as part of a metaphor expression when there is animation or transfer of human actions to it.
Examples are such sentences: “The birch trees put on their earrings, as if the girls were of marriageable age” or “I put on a sheepskin coat made of snow, an oak tree, like an old grandfather, stands for itself, creaks.”
Back to Rosenthal
At school, teachers explain the use of “dress” and “put on” based on the following explanations by Rosenthal: they dress someone (or something, for example, a doll, a corpse, a stuffed animal) in something or something, and they put something on then on someone.
That is, you can dress or dress your son in a jacket, the bride in a wedding dress, a hand with a glove. But you can put something on someone or something: a jacket for a son, a wedding dress for a bride, a glove for a hand. Even a hint phrase is given: "Grandfather is dressed, a sheepskin coat is on."
Antonyms help us!
Some people, faced with the dilemma of how to say "put on" or "put on a coat", have come up with an easy way to choose the right option. It turns out that you can use the antonyms of these words.
A word with the opposite meaning of the verb “dress” will be the action “undress”, and the antonym of the verb “put on” is considered to be “take off”. Since the phrase "take off your coat" is meaningless, it is, of course, impossible to put on a coat.
In the same way, you can make the right choice between two expressions: "put on glasses" or "put on glasses." Can you take off your glasses? Of course not! Therefore, the second option should be considered correct - to wear glasses.
It is this explanation that most modern people are satisfied with, considering it the easiest and most correct.
semantic confusion
In fact, the use of the verbs “put on” or “put on” most often does not introduce confusion into the understanding of what has been said. Although such a possibility exists if, for example, the conversation is about a parsley doll, which, like a glove, is put on a hand.
An offer to dress a parsley doll will mean that the doll should be dressed in new clothes: change a hat, put on a cape or tie a scarf. But the request to put on the doll already means that you need to pull the parsley on your hand and get ready for the performance. So in this situation, the use of the verbs “put on” or “put on” radically changes the meaning of what was said.
A similar thing can also arise when it comes to the words “scarecrow” or “scarecrow”, because they can also be dressed in something, or put on a pole or pole.
Humor in Russian lessons
As you know, teenagers in all ages have been distinguished by nihilism. The majority enthusiastically perceives with hostility all generally accepted rules. And, of course, they are trying to prove that the words “put on” and “put on” are almost the same, so it makes no sense to figure out which one should be used in this or that case.
The teacher has to be an artist, a storyteller in the classroom, be able to masterfully conduct a discussion, select irrefutable evidence, and logically prove the need for knowledge of the rules of the Russian language. And he also needs to be ... a comedian.
After all, humor is probably the most powerful weapon against ignorance. And even if the situation told by the teacher will not be very plausible, but its imagery will leave a “notch” in the minds forever. Thanks to the funny “picture” created by the imagination of a wise teacher, students will understand what is the difference between the verbs “put on” and “put on”, and a huge one at that.
dressed chicken
The confusion in the use of these two verbs is due to the fact that both verbs are of the same root. However, the verb "put on" has more meanings. Along with the process of putting on garments, it can also carry the meaning of “putting on”, for example, on a skewer or pike. The story, which will make the guys laugh and remain in their memory, is just based on this ambiguity of the verb “put on”.
At one of the student picnics in the company there was a young man who understood everything literally. His name was Hernando, he was Mexican. The guys decided to cook chicken on a skewer.
When the fire in the fire blazed merrily, the person in charge of preparing the treat said to Hernando: “Dress the chicken - here is the skewer!” The guy to whom the request was addressed nodded his head and walked away from the fire to the table where the raw food lay.
He was absent for quite some time. But when he returned with a chicken in his hands, friendly laughter just blew up the neighborhood! The chicken was wearing a leather cap, her waist was adorned with a skirt with straps - a sort of sarafan made from a chiffon scarf of one of the flirtatious students, and the stumps of her legs were tucked into someone's sneakers.
The one who gave Hernando the order to "dress the chicken" was the most outraged, because it was his cap and his sneakers that were ruined by the stupid Mexican. But he calmly replied that he fulfilled the request exactly: to dress a chicken means to dress it in some kind of outfit. He already knows Russian!
Of course, at first the order seemed a little strange to him. But he reasoned like this: being familiar with some Russian customs, the young man never tired of being surprised by them. For example, at carols people dress up in the skins of various animals, and on New Year's Eve they decorate a Christmas tree. Maybe there is some other custom when you need to dress up a chicken before frying it?
An ironic illustration of the rules helps better memorization
By the way, after such a funny story, the teacher can present the children with pictures with captions: one picture, which depicts a “smart” chicken, and under it the phrase: “Put the chicken in clothes,” and the second picture with a carcass on a skewer, under which it is written: “ Put the chicken on a skewer."
After such a humorous and visual impact, the guys will never confuse what to say: “put on” or “put on”. Chicken dress, cap and sneakers - this picture will be remembered for sure!
When do we say "dressed"?
So it's time to deal with definitions formed from verbs. It should be remembered that the verb "clothe" is used only in relation to animate objects or inanimate, but having signs of a person (corpse, doll, stuffed animal, mannequin). As mentioned above, sometimes this verb appears in metaphors with animated objects of inanimate nature - the abilities of living beings are attributed to them.
Therefore, the word "clothed" can also serve as a definition of only a living being or animated by human fantasy. A dressed man, a dressed lady, houses dressed in snow caps - these are examples of the use of the word "dressed".
Although in fairy tales, heroes (animated inanimate objects in ordinary life) can be dressed: this is a table, a bed, and other things.
“The table, dressed in a festive tablecloth, proudly looked at its neighbors” or “A photograph of her father dressed in an elegant frame, still gathering dust in the closet, was extremely happy from these changes in her fate.”
"Glove on", "glove on" - which is correct?
In relation to inanimate objects, the definition "put on" should be used. That is, the suit cannot be dressed, but only worn. The same applies to the words "glasses", "skirt", "coat", "hat" and others, denoting items that are worn.
The glove example can be used in the classroom to explain the semantic difference between the terms “dressed” and “put on”. For better memorization, you can provide students with pictures with captions. Moreover, one of them will be reliable - with the signature "worn glove." But the picture signed with the phrase “wearing a glove” will be humorous in nature - there, on the glove, or rather, on one of her fingers, a hat is put on and a scarf is tied.
The phrase “wearing a glove” can only exist in a fairy tale or a fantasy story, where the accessory comes to life, can dress up, speak, think. For example, some ladies wear rings over gloves. And such a fantastic plot allows the use of this phrase: the hostess put a ring on top of one glove, but not on the other. And the "clothed glove", with a golden belt adorned with a diamond, taunts her sister, who "is forced to go out naked." This story may end with the fact that the hostess loses one glove - the one that was “undressed”. The “rich glove” rejoices - now she will no longer tolerate this annoying beggar next to her! However, misfortune awaits her: the hostess, having discovered the loss and grieved, throws a stupid asshole into the trash.
The difference between wear and dress confuses many. Incorrect use of them is designated as a speech error. These words are paronyms, they are similar in sound and spelling, but they have different meanings. Like any other paronyms, this pair of words is often misused.
To understand the differences between them, as well as learn the rule of how to use them correctly, you can use simple ways to remember them.
This pair of words was highlighted back in 1843 in the Reference Place of the Russian Word.
Already there, attention was focused on the complexity of using these words, it was indicated how each word was written, it was described what the difference between them was, when to write and say to put on, and when to put on.
Words are similar in morphemic composition and sound, these are verbs. But at the same time they differ in such characteristics:
- they have different prefixes (o- and na-);
- different lexical meaning.
Fixed in explanatory dictionaries. To dress means to dress someone in some kind of clothes, to cover someone, to help. Putting on is an action directed at oneself, at the one who speaks.
But even understanding the lexical differences between these words does not always help you choose the right option.
Important! Rules, tables, examples and “reminders” come to the rescue - ways of memorizing the rules for using words.
How to choose the right word
To select a word, you can use the table:
Examples can be used for better understanding. For the word put on:
- The girl put on a beautiful snow-white dress.
- I put on a hat because it's cold outside.
- In the evening a cool wind blew, do not forget to put on a warm coat.
- I put on those new jewelry you gave me.
- Put on the ring, I love it so much!
- When putting on trousers, do not forget to take out the belt.
- We put on the same overalls quite by accident.
For the word dress:
- I can't get ready so fast, I still have three kids to dress!
- Dressing children for a walk is the responsibility of educators.
- Dress warmly, it's cold outside!
- Don't wear that skirt to her, it doesn't fit under pantyhose!
- It seems strange to me to dress a dog in so many clothes.
- Put on her glasses, she can't see well!
There is a vivid example of a "memory" with a glove. A worn glove is one that has something on it: a hat or a scarf. A put on glove is a glove on the hand.
If these methods are not sufficient, other options can be used.
How to remember the difference forever
Remembering the difference between words and not making mistakes when using them helps not only the rules, but also “memory”: associative short rhymes, rhyming lines, short sentences, comic sketches. For example:
- Mom dressed her son, he put on the wrong pants again.
- I will put on a red coat, and I will dress you in a blue coat.
- I dressed in the new fashion, put on a dress from a chest of drawers.
- I put on a jacket for Maruska and put on my boots.
- Dress the doll in boots, put on those pants for yourself!
Advice!“Put on something, put on yourself!”, “Put on yourself, dress someone” - sometimes it’s enough to remember these simple phrases for the correct use of words in the future.
You can come up with your own phrase. It should be simple and rhythmic, easy to remember.
Help to choose between words antonymic pairs:
- put on / take off;
- dress / undress.
If in doubt about the use of these words, you can replace them. For example, which usage is correct: "put on gloves" or "put on gloves"? If in the second case we replace the word with an antonym, we get an incorrect phrase: "Undress gloves."
Is there a difference?
Disputes continue between researchers of the Russian language about the normative use of these words.
Some argue that there is not much difference, and the modern language is being modified.
This leads to the fact that there is no longer a need to follow the word usage so strictly.
For example, even in the explanatory dictionary of Ushakov, in the meaning of the word “dress”, it can be used instead of “put on”.
And in 1973, in the reference book “Difficulties in word usage and variants of the norms of the Russian literary language,” it was allowed to use both words freely without distinction, and this was not considered a mistake.
So all the same, you need to think about how to say: dress or wear? Or let everyone speak as he pleases?
Modern researchers are divided: some defend the variability of the Russian language and advocate the preservation of shades of meaning behind each word.
The other part supports the changes and the trend of the language towards simplification. This question is often raised, but there is no consensus on this matter yet.
Useful video
Summing up
When using one of two words, the target audience of the text should be taken into account: if it is an academic text, then it is desirable to write in accordance with the accepted norms of the Russian language.
In live speech, some mistakes may be made, but in any case, you always need to be able to argue your position. To do this, you need to arm yourself with rules, expenses from dictionaries and vivid examples and views of different linguists on this problem.
Dress up and put on
Question
Which is correct: "to put on" or "to put on a dress"?
Verbs dress and put on - multivalued. The meanings in which actions are indicated in relation to a person are as follows:
Dress up - whom, what. 1. Dress someone up. in some clothes. Dress a child, sick, wounded; cf. dress up a doll, mannequin…
put on - what. 1. Pull on, pull on (clothes, shoes, cover, etc.), covering, enveloping someone with something. Put on a suit, skirt, coat, jacket, shoes, mask, headphones…
Verb dress enters into combination with animate nouns (and with a small number of inanimate ones, denoting the likeness of a person: doll, mannequin, skeleton); put on - with the inanimate.
The difference in the semantics of these words is emphasized by the fact that they form different antonymic pairs: put on - take off, put on - undress .
This is confirmed by Novella Matveeva:
"Dress", "put on"… Two words
We confuse so stupidly!
Frosty dawn dawned,
The old grandfather dressed in a fur coat.
And the fur coat, therefore, was put on.
"Dress", "put on"... Let's see:
When to wear and what to wear.
I believe that on the grandfather
Three fur coats can be worn.
But I don't think that grandfather
It can be worn on a fur coat!
Distinguish
dress and put on.
. Yu. A. Belchikov, O. I. Razheva. 2015 .
See what is "put on and put on" in other dictionaries:
dress- dress. See: put on...
Look dress and wear ... Dictionary of difficulties of the Russian language
put on- and dress. In the meaning “clothe yourself, dress, put on something; to fit something on yourself” to put on. Put on a coat, a suit. Wear a hat and gloves. Put on boots. Put on glasses. In the meaning “to dress someone in some kind of clothes” to dress. dress the patient... Dictionary of pronunciation and stress difficulties in modern Russian
CLOTHING- DRESS, dress, dress, led. dress, sov. (to dress). 1. whom what into what or what. Put on some clothes. Dress up the child. || Cover, wrap something for warmth. Dress the horse with a blanket. Dress the patient with a blanket. 2. trans., what than. Cover by,… … Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov
WEAR- WEAR, put on, put on, led. put it on, sir. (to put on). 1. what to whom. To cover, clothe someone with something, attach something to someone with something, covering, clothing. Put a cover on the furniture. Put a hat on the child. Gave him…… Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov
put on- Put on, put on, we strongly recommend that you remember the difference between the verbs to put on and put on, otherwise you risk revealing your ignorance in the most inappropriate environment. We will dwell on this difference in more detail when we talk about ... ... Dictionary of Russian language errors
dress- Cm … Synonym dictionary
CLOTHING- CLOTHING, enu, enesh; day; child; sovereign 1. whom (what) into what or what. Cover someone. what n. clothing, cover. O. a child in a coat. O. with a blanket (cover). Winter covered the fields with snow (trans.) [not to be confused with what to put on someone (what)]. 2. whom (what) ... Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov
put on- what and what to what. Put on a coat. Put on glasses. Put the ring on your finger. Put the tip on the pencil. Put the backpack on your back. Alyosha put on a jacket, Kovbysh fathers a jacket (Gorbatov). He put on all his insignia (Chekhov). Wed dress ... Control Dictionary
dress- whom that in that or than. Dress the child in a coat. Winter covered the fields with snow. Grandmother was dressed in a silk shushun and a skirt and tied with a silk scarf (Aksakov). [Katerina] brought [Ordynov] to the bed, laid him down and dressed him with a blanket (Dostoevsky). Wed put on... Control Dictionary
Books
- Russian without load, Andreeva Julia, Turkova Ksenia. The book is deliberately conceived as a tool: Yulia Andreeva and Ksenia Turkova picked up typical mistakes in speech, written and oral, explained them in simple language and packaged them in a reader-friendly…
Other people's things - be it trinkets or clothes - carry the charge of the energy of the person who owned this thing. Therefore, not everyone is happy to collect other people's particles in their home. And yet, there are quite a lot of people shopping in second-hand shops in the world.
True, in Azerbaijan, second-hand is not particularly honored (in any case, there are no queues in stores), but this is compensated by the passion to use the things of friends and acquaintances. For example, among young fashionistas and close friends it is customary to exchange things. It is even more common to borrow things for children from friends. After all, kids grow up quickly, and often practically new things quickly become unnecessary. Here they are distributed.
Personally, I am a big opponent of any other people's things in the house, in the wardrobe, etc. And I prefer not to have something than to rent it or ask friends for it.
Nevertheless, among my acquaintances there are many people who prefer to dress not only themselves, but also their children in other people's clothes. the main argument is that children grow up quickly, you can’t get enough of them, and what is needed? Why do they need brands? You can also walk around in a worn one.
On the one hand, this, of course, saves the budget, but on the other hand, I don’t understand this.
Well, if we really go into the wilds of these conversations about the energy of other people's things, then a few years ago, acquaintances told me a story about a girl who tried on her friend's wedding dress. It was in this dress that the groom found her. I don’t know if the energy played its role, or the groom changed his mind, but then everything happened absolutely amazingly. The groom, a few days before the wedding, abandoned the bride and married her friend. In such a strange way, the girl, trying on her friend's dress, tried on her fate.
As for the experts in this matter, they unanimously assert that any thing has an energy-informational connection to you personally, to your consciousness (to thoughts, emotions, personal experiences and problems) and to certain Forces of the Subtle World that patronize you . In a sense, we can say that each of your things is a small, but source of your energy. That is, the person who started wearing your thing has access to your energy, and your energy will somehow influence him, writes esotericblog.ru.
If the owner of the thing is unfavorable, sick, or just a very bad person (carries a lot of evil in himself). All the things of such a person, as a rule, are filled with heavy, often destructive or simply very negative (dark) energy, from which a normal positive person can feel very bad. If you wear the thing of a dysfunctional or negative person, his problems, illnesses, negative karma, just destructive energy can have a detrimental effect on you and your destiny. I think you've heard that things can be cursed by their owner. Although, again, the thing can be cleaned with the help of a special esoteric ritual.
You should not wear the things of a deceased person, especially if they were removed from the corpse.
You don't need to wear clothes that aren't new if you have no idea who has worn them before you. But there is a nuance here, because any thing can be made your own by removing the energy of the previous owner from it and connecting it to your energy. Good esoteric healers always use such techniques, even when they get a completely new thing in the store.
If you have found some object or piece of jewelry, if someone gave you something, this thing must be energetically and informationally cleansed and connected to your energies.
How to energetically make a thing your own and remove the energy of another person from it?
The scheme of this ritual may shock many. But, in principle, there is nothing bad and dangerous in it, but in general terms it is the removal of alien energy from a thing in order to make it as comfortable as possible for oneself. At the same time, it is necessary to turn to higher powers, the guardian angel with a request to take someone else's energy from the thing.
But, as experts warn, if the owner of the thing has undergone jad (that is, damage), then it is not worth keeping this thing at home, and even more so wearing it. And no amateur performance will help here - you need a specialist.
So here it is...
By the way, Russian psychic Elena Yasevich spoke about the energy of other people's things and clothes on her website. According to her, clothing, like any other personal item of a person, contains the energy of its owner and has an invisible connection with him.
Second hand lovers
Second-hand stores have become increasingly popular. For many, these outlets are a great option to get a quality, but inexpensive item, albeit a little worn. If you do not take into account the hygienic side of this issue, is it not dangerous to wear other people's things? Psychic Elena Yasevich claims that choosing a second-hand shop can damage a person’s energy. No one knows who wore these clothes before you. Perhaps he had a serious illness or he had a very complex energy? No one is allowed to know this. Yes, and no need. Simply, when buying second-hand clothes, remember that the energy of the former owner can affect your destiny.
Is it possible to wear the things of the deceased
Elena Yasevich said that in many religions they have a positive attitude towards wearing the things of the deceased. There is even a custom according to which the clothes of the deceased are distributed after 40 days from the date of death. But does it harm the personal energy of a person? All things of dead people become dead, that is, they are endowed with the energy of death. Nothing terrible, however, in this energy is not. But in such clothes you will not see either good luck or development. Elena Yasevich recommends burning things of the dead.
Can children wear their older siblings' clothes??
Many parents do not see anything wrong with their youngest child wearing clothes for older children. This is practiced in many families in order to save money. On the one hand, a thing that has already been “saturated” with the energy of the family can become a strong amulet for a younger child. But there is also the other side of the coin. Wearing clothes is not always safe. So, if there is a large energy and psychological gap between the older and younger children (children do not get along with each other, or they are completely different in character), then you should not save on things for the younger. There is one wise saying among the people: "if you put someone else's shoes on a child, you will spoil your fate."
Psychic Elena Yasevich noticed that it is possible to clean clothes from the energy of his old master. To do this, the item must be rinsed in running cold water. You can do this in a river, stream or at a source. From ourselves we will add - it is possible and under the crane.
If you ask my opinion, then I think that regardless of whether you are a person far from prejudice or, on the contrary, who believes in signs, it is best to leave other people's things to their owners. After all, even if talking about someone else's energy is a fairy tale, the new thing will definitely be better than the old one.
If you formulate this for yourself once and for all, then, having a very modest wardrobe, in a few minutes you will choose an image suitable for the occasion. After all, how often for this or that occasion we put on our best things, but on the spot we feel out of place, because we either overdid it or didn’t finish the image. And it is for such cases that there are rules for several, but win-win things.1. We are sure you have a little black dress in your wardrobe.. Is there a little blue, gray or green? The choice of color depends on which one suits you best. But having a simple and well-fitting dress in a neutral shade is a worthwhile investment in your wardrobe. Let's say that in the evening your friends invited you to a restaurant. You do not know exactly what format it is, and you have only an hour before the release. You can, of course, wear the same little black dress, but this is the most banal thing you can think of. Yes, and in this outfit you will meet a lot of people there. And if you put on too colorful and solemn, you risk looking like this is your first trip to a restaurant in your life. In such cases, simple outfits save, without complex designs, bright colors, prints and decors. They are like a canvas on which you can draw whatever you want. Put on this simple dress, and pick up chic shoes for it.
black dress
black dress_1
Angela Harutyunyan
Fashion blogger
The main success of such a simple and appropriate dress for all occasions is that it should fit perfectly on your figure, emphasizing the advantages and hiding the flaws. It is difficult to find such a perfect dress, but if you find it, it will turn out to be the best that you can have in your wardrobe.
2. Stylish jacket with an interesting cut or rich decor you also need. He should attract all the attention in the image to himself. The jacket can be with rhinestones, with spikes and rivets, a complex style or a very bright shade. And with him you can just put on that same little black dress or an ordinary white shirt and black trousers. Even jeans and a black top with an interesting jacket will look attractive. So this thing will save you once again when you don't know what to wear for a special occasion.
basic wardrobe
Photo 1 of 15
1
In the basic wardrobe there must be a dress - better than fashionable blue ...
Photo 2 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
2
Or rich green.
Photo 3 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
3
And, of course, at least one little black dress.
Photo 4 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
4
Jeans should be in any wardrobe, and preferably not alone...
Photo 5 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
5
A white shirt will look great with jeans and a skirt.
Photo 6 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
6
A blazer with sequins is a great option for the evening.
Photo 7 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
7
A lace jacket can be worn with a pencil skirt.
Photo 8 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
8
Be sure to buy yourself a cardigan in beige or pastel shades.
Photo 9 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
9
A gray dress is suitable for meetings with friends.
Photo 10 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
10
In this summer dress with a floral print, you can go for a walk in the park.
Photo 12 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
12
A black jacket will go well with a gray top and jeans.
Photo 13 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
13
In such a brilliant evening dress you can go to a wedding.
Photo 14 of 15
Full screen Back to gallery
