The war is undoubtedly a terrible tragedy that befell the Russian people. It forced our huge country to unite against the enemy. A.P. Platonov in this text says that only thanks to the responsiveness, mercy of ordinary people, Russia survived this terrible period. The writer poses the problem of showing compassion during the war, helping one's neighbor.
Position A.P.
Platonov can be clearly seen in the cited text. The author believes that only together people can resist the enemy. Responsiveness and love help a person to pass even the most difficult tests. The writer tells about two boys who are doing hard work for their age. They soften the soil for a garden to feed those who remained in the village, who were not taken by the Germans. But the Nazis did not need only old people and small children, the boys were left only because of illness: “We are alone and can still endure work, while others do not have the strength - they are small children.” Heroes feel responsible for the lives of other people, therefore, despite their age, they work for everyone. And most importantly, the little hard workers do not resist, they are driven by the desire to help their neighbors: “We have a desire: you see, we are plowing together and the wind will help us.”
After all, only together people can survive any difficulties.
In the work "Farewell of the Slav" Natalya Sukhinina describes the hard life in the conditions of the Great Patriotic War. The children, whose father was taken to the front, were taken in by the godmother. She herself had five children, but she still received six children with tenderness and love, who had nowhere else to go. The mercy, the cordiality of this woman saved the lives of six people.
In the story of M.A. Sholokhov "The Fate of a Man" raises the problem of not only the heroism of a simple Soviet soldier in the war, but also the problem of preserving human feelings, readiness to help those who need it, cordiality and attentiveness to the weak and defenseless. Andrei Sokolov is an example of a real hero, capable of performing not only a military, but also a moral feat. By adopting the boy, he thereby saved his life, gave hope and true fatherly love. I think that thanks to such people, our country won such a terrible and bloody war against the Nazis.
Thus, I believe that responsiveness and sensitivity to others must be maintained in any, even the most difficult situations.
Effective preparation for the exam (all subjects) - start preparing
Updated: 2018-01-17
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
Useful material on the topic
Is there a place for mercy in war? And is it possible to show mercy to the enemy in war? The text of V.N. Lyalin makes us think about these questions. Here the author raises the problem of showing mercy to the enemy.
In the text, the author tells about Mikhail Ivanovich Bogdanov, who in 1943 was sent to the war to serve as an orderly. In one of the fiercest battles, Mikhail Ivanovich managed to protect the wounded from SS submachine gunners. commissar of the battalion. The next day after the battle, noticing the corpse of a German soldier lying in a ditch, Mikhail Ivanovich showed mercy, deciding to bury the German. The author shows us that despite the war, Mikhail Ivanovich was able to preserve his humanity, not remaining indifferent to the enemy. Having learned about this case, the battalion commissar decided to cancel the order of Glory presentation of the orderly. However, it was important for Mikhail Ivanovich to act according to his conscience, and not to receive an award.
I agree with the position of the author and am convinced that there is a place for mercy in war. After all, it doesn’t matter whether the enemy is dead or unarmed, he no longer poses any danger. a German soldier. It is very important in a brutal war to be able to preserve your humanity and not let your heart cool down.
The problem of showing mercy to the enemy is raised in the works of V.L. Kondratiev, Sashka, The main character Sashka captured a German during a German attack. like himself. He no longer saw him as an enemy. Sashka promised the Germans life, he said that Russians are not animals, they would not kill the unarmed. He showed the German a leaflet saying that prisoners were guaranteed life and return to their homeland. However, when Sashka brought the German to the battalion commander, the German did not tell anything, and therefore the battalion commander gave Sasha the order to shoot the German. Sashka's hand did not rise to the unarmed, so similar to him soldier. and this allowed him to remain human. As a result, the battalion commander, after analyzing Sasha's words, decided to cancel his order.
The problem of showing mercy to the enemy is touched upon in the work of L.N. Tolstoy, War and Peace. One of the heroes of the novel, the Russian commander Kutuzov, shows mercy to the French fleeing Russia. He pities them, because he understands that they acted on the orders of Napoleon and in no case dared to disobey him. Speaking to the soldiers of the Preobrazhensky Regiment, Kutuzov says:> We see that all the soldiers are united not only by a feeling of hatred, but also by pity for the defeated enemy.
Thus, we can conclude that in a war it is necessary to show mercy even to the enemy, no matter whether he is defeated or killed. A soldier is first of all a person and must preserve in himself such qualities as mercy and humanity. It is they who allow him to remain a man.
Effective preparation for the exam (all subjects) - start preparing
Updated: 2017-02-27
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
In the text proposed for analysis, the Russian writer B.L. Vasiliev poses the problem of mercy during the war.
To draw the reader's attention to this problem, the author tells an incident that happened to a soldier during the war. The writer notes that the Soviet soldier, when meeting with the enemy, reacted with lightning speed, shooting at both, and only an accident helped one of the Germans survive. This is clear from sentences 5-6: “and the second German was saved by an accident ...”, “... the cartridge was skewed when serving.” The author points out that the German did not resist Pluzhnikov, on the contrary, he dutifully followed the instructions of the Soviet soldier, answering his questions. So, in sentences 19-29, we are talking about the fact that the German talks about his civilian life and connection with the German army: “and he is a worker, mobilized in April ...”, “he shows his kids”.
B.L. Vasiliev emphasizes that Pluzhnikov showed mercy to the German soldier due to the fact that he could not come to terms with his act, because by killing the first German, he was in danger, and now he had to kill a defenseless old man, even if he was fighting on the side enemy. Sentences 57-58 confirm this idea: “… he did not shoot this German after all for himself. For my conscience, which wanted to remain clean.”
I agree with B.L. Vasiliev. Indeed, a person who realizes the value of human life is capable of compassion even towards the enemy.
Let us turn to the literature and confirm the stated idea. Recall the novel by A.S. Pushkin's "The Captain's Daughter", in which the invader Pugachev was capable of mercy towards Pyotr Grinev. Even before the capture of the Belgorod fortress, Peter once helped a stranger by giving him a sheepskin coat. This stranger turned out to be Pugachev, who then decided to do the right thing, leaving Peter alive, believing that Grinev was worthy of mercy on his part.
Truly merciful was the decision of the protagonist of "Sasha" V. Kondratiev. This story shows how, despite the order of the battalion commander, on martial law, a person can be capable of compassion for the enemy. Sashka was ordered to kill the captured German, but his conscience did not allow him to shoot an unarmed, albeit an enemy. As a result, at the risk of being sent to court, Sasha decided to take him to headquarters in order to ensure the safety of the German, which shows what humane and humane deeds people can be capable of during the war.
In conclusion, we can say that a person can always remain a person. Even in times of war, a person has a choice.
Effective preparation for the exam (all subjects) - start preparing
Updated: 2018-03-24
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
4. /SAMPLES of essays in the Russian language/The problem of choice.docx
5. /SAMPLES of essays in the Russian language/Reasoning about honor.doc
6. /SAMPLES of essays on the Russian language/The meaning of life.docx
7. /SAMPLES of essays in the Russian language/Let's keep the memory of the fallen comrades!.docx
8. /SAMPLES of essays in the Russian language/Let's save the past for the sake of the future!.docx
9. /SAMPLES of essays on the Russian language/Wanderers as a phenomenon of Russian life.docx
10. /SAMPLES of essays on the Russian language/The price of friendship....docx
11. /SAMPLES of essays on the Russian language/A man at war.docx I read the text of the Russian writer L. Leonov, his thoughts did not leave me indifferent
Tells us about how he "one morning, walking in the woods, pondered what talent means." Prishvin saw a "tiny bird"
The problem of heroism, choice
T. M. Jafarli reflects on the problem of preserving moral values in modern life by modern man
Is it possible to give a teenager "the meaning of life on a silver platter"?
Is it necessary to preserve the memory of fallen comrades? The Soviet writer D. Granin discusses this moral problem
Sample essay-miniature (exa in Russian) part (Text by L. Zhukhovitsky)
I read the text of the famous Russian singer F. I. Chaliapin, and his thoughts did not leave me indifferent
What is the price of true friendship and how is it tested? Publicist T. Tess reflects on this problem
V.P. Astafiev believes that a person, in spite of everything, even the death of comrades and hatred for the enemy, is able to maintain faith in people, compassion and not lose his human appearance. After all, both a Russian doctor and a German from the military
download docx
The author tells a story that took place during the Great Patriotic War. At a halt, the soldiers who repulsed the attack of the Nazis witnessed a barbaric scene: a Russian soldier, in a fit of anger, decided to take revenge on the captured Germans (“knackers”) for the death of his relatives (“Marishka was burned-and-and! The villagers of all ... The whole village ... "), grabbing machine gun and firing several bursts at them. Boris, a soldier from his platoon, rushed to save the captured Germans, covering them with his body. Some time later, the author shows the military hospital, where the wounded, "even ours, even strangers," were bandaged by a Russian doctor. Astafiev, showing that in the war the wounded are not divided into friends and foes, uses a detail - a "wooden washing trough" full of "bandages, scraps of clothing, shrapnel and bullets, in which the blood of different people mixed and thickened."
V.P. Astafiev believes that a person, in spite of everything, even the death of comrades and hatred for the enemy, is able to maintain faith in people, compassion and not lose his human appearance. After all, both the Russian doctor and the German "from military doctors" together assisted the wounded in this shootout. In the souls of these people at the moment there is no place for a “sense of revenge”, as L.N. once wrote. Tolstoy, "it gave way to a feeling of pity." I fully agree with the opinion of the author. Of course, war is a terrible and cruel test. But people, despite all the horrors of wartime, for the most part, did not turn into a fierce beast, but retained the ability to compassion, mercy, retained the high moral qualities of a person.
Russian literature "taught" a person to boldly look into the eyes of the enemy, brought up a feeling of contempt for him, calling to smash him everywhere. Reading M. Sholokhov (“The Science of Hatred”), K. Simonov (the poem “Kill him!”, The novel “Soldiers Are Not Born”) we understand the holy feelings of warriors who despised the enemy, who mercilessly swept away everything in their path. But when the victory was won, the enemy for our soldiers, especially the prisoner, became not a warrior, but a simple person worthy of pity and compassion. Let us recall the scene with the French prisoners (Rambal and Morel) in the novel by L.N. Tolstoy "War and Peace". Not enemies, no, - "... also people," - this is how the author himself writes about them. This “people too” was also said by Kutuzov: “We did not feel sorry for ourselves, but now you can feel sorry for them.”
Wars have always been a measure not only of a man's courage, but above all a measure of his humanity. We can also see the image of this sense of humanity in the works of the 20th century dedicated to the military war of 1941-1945. V. Nekrasov (“In the trenches of Stalingrad”) spoke about how Russian soldiers pulled the German wounded from the burning German hospital out of the fire. V. Kondratiev ("Sashka") tells about the complex feelings of a young soldier who has to escort a German prisoner alone. These are complex feelings: hatred for the fascist, and interest in the German soldier and his service, and pity for the prisoner, similar to his classmate, and the understanding that he is not an enemy, but an ordinary prisoner. And yet, a feeling of mercy prevails (“terrible non-humans, those who attacked from behind a hillock, those he mercilessly and ruthlessly killed - enemies, and this one ... is the same as me. Only deceived ...”). Of course, for Russian writers It has always been the main thing, the best quality of a person is humanity.
It seems to me that it was precisely the feeling of humanity that helped us win more than one war, to triumph over barbarism, savagery and cruelty.
Prepared by the teacher of Russian language and literature Parfenova N.V.
Mercy and compassion... These are two eternal moral categories, over the solution of which the great classics I. Turgenev and A. Chekhov, F. Dostoevsky and M. Gorky struggled. All of them shared the point of view of L. N. Tolstoy: "To believe in good, people must start doing it." Tolstoy's words will be relevant during the Great Patriotic War.
Thus, understanding that humanity is inherent in a person in war, I can conclude that it is during the days of battles and combat everyday life that people need to be at least a little more merciful to each other, strive to share the pain of another, console and support the suffering.
Mercy and compassion... These are two eternal moral categories, over the solution of which the great classics I. Turgenev and A. Chekhov, F. Dostoevsky and M. Gorky struggled. All of them shared the point of view of L. N. Tolstoy: "To believe in good, people must start doing it." Tolstoy's words will be relevant during the Great Patriotic War.
Millions of Soviet people lost their relatives, friends, and laid down their lives on the Altar of Victory. Despite the terrible crimes of the enemy invaders, Soviet soldiers humanely treated the captured Germans, women and children of defeated Germany, gave them the opportunity to warm up, satisfy their hunger and receive medical care. Mercy and humanity, the noblest feelings of man, reigned in the hearts of the fighters.
V. Astafiev tells about this in the wonderful story "The Shepherd and the Shepherdess", in which there is a vivid episode that reflects the different attitudes of people towards prisoners. A soldier in camouflage, who recently learned about the death of people close to him, executed by the Nazis, could not restrain himself. In a wild rage, he began to shoot at the prisoners. Grief overshadows the human mind. Some people find a way out and continue to live on, and some go out like a candle, broken by misfortune. That was our avenger. The protagonist of the work, Boris, did not let the prisoners be executed until the end, because he believed that the prisoners were defeated enemies, and they should be treated humanely. The same applies to the wounded Germans and the doctor assisting the soldiers, without understanding who is in front of him: a Soviet or a German soldier.
But in the story of Vyacheslav Degtev "Choice" tells about another war, the Chechen campaign, and about a soldier thrown into that inhuman meat grinder. What brought him to Chechnya? Loneliness, hopelessness that Roman felt after the departure of his wife, the exchange of an apartment, and the onset of drunkenness. Realizing that in a quiet, calm life he will wither away, the man goes to war. There he meets Oksana, who works at a field bakery. Roman will not say a word to the girl he likes, but his harsh life slowly began to brighten up with her presence. Once, during the shelling, Oksana was seriously wounded and lost both legs. It is not known what will happen to her next ... Roman, in order to support the girl who still does not know about the grief that has befallen her, invites her to marry him ... The fighter’s mercy towards the victim is incredible ... The nurse is crying silently, watching this picture, crying because I realized: there is also compassion in war!
