The results of the OGE in the Russian language of the 2014-2015 academic year, the proficiency of the exam participants in the subject in 2015 was 99.6% compared to 99.9% in 2014. - the minimum score in 2015 was reduced from 14 points to 12 points due to a decrease in the number of tasks in part 2. - The quality of linguistic education of graduates of the basic school is satisfactory
The results of the OGE in the Russian language for the 2014-2015 academic year In 2015, 39 (0.4%) graduates received the mark "2", in 2014 - 99 (0.96%) students, which is an indicator of positive dynamics in teaching the Russian language. One hundred percent level of performance was demonstrated by examinees of Babaevsky, Vashkinsky, Verkhovazhsky, Vozhegodsky, Gryazovetsky, Kichmengsko-Gorodetsky, Mezhdurechensky, Nyuksensky, Sokolsky, Syamzhensky, Totemsky, Ust-Kubinsky, Ustyuzhensky, Kharovsky, Chagodoshchensky, Sheksninsky municipal districts, GOU. The percentage of students who received marks "4" and "5" on the exam increased from 48.91% in 2014 to 55% in 2015. more than 50% of students received marks “4”, “5” in the exam in Babaevsky, Babushkinsky, Vashkinsky, Verkhovazhsky, Vozhegodsky, Gryazovetsky, Kichmengsky-Gorodetsky, Mezhdurechensky, Nyuksensky, Sokolsky, Syamzhensky, Totemsky, Ust-Kubinsky, Ustyuzhensky, Kharovsky, Chagodoshchensky, Sheksninsky municipal districts, GOU.
A brief meaningful analysis of the OGE in the Russian language Part 1 of the work consisted in writing a concise summary of the listened text. Statistical data: 37.7% of graduates cannot identify all the micro-themes of the text, 14.58% of graduates do not know how to compress the text, 65.87% of graduates are not able to realize their intention in an appropriate compositional form that ensures the semantic integrity, coherence and consistency of the written statement . The skills of information processing of texts in students of grade 9 are not sufficiently formed.
Brief meaningful analysis of the OGE in the Russian language Among the tasks with a short answer (B 1-B 9), the following tasks have the lowest percentage of completion: tasks 8, 11 (determining the grammatical basis of a sentence) - 0.57%; task 9 (isolated members of the sentence) - 0.53%; task 10 (recognition of introductory words in a sentence) - 0.71%; tasks 12, 13 - syntactic analysis of a complex sentence - 0, 42%. . The punctuation preparation of the examinees, as well as in 2013, 2014, is lower than the spelling. Methodological miscalculations in the study of syntax and punctuation are due to the fact that when analyzing a syntactic or punctuation phenomenon, its features are not taken into account: semantic, grammatical, intonation, punctuation, features of use in speech.
Brief meaningful analysis of the OGE in the Russian language Part 3 of the work contained three tasks (essay-reasoning on a linguistic topic, two types of essays related to text analysis) that test the communicative competence of schoolchildren: C 1 To 1 - the presence of a reasonable answer to the question posed. Only 59.42% of the examinees received the highest score on this criterion. 40.58% of graduates did not cope with the task according to this criterion. The reason for the difficulties: insufficient formation of universal educational activities: to define concepts, analyze the text, systematize, generalize, draw conclusions.
Brief meaningful analysis of the OGE in the Russian language K 2 Argumentation of the thesis Could not give convincing examples-arguments from the read text - 46, 10% of graduates. The ability to analyze and evaluate linguistic phenomena and facts is not sufficiently formed
Brief meaningful analysis of the OGE in the Russian language Analysis of the performance of the examination work according to the criteria for assessing literacy and the actual accuracy of speech: 40, 14% of graduates demonstrate an unsatisfactory level of spelling literacy; 50, 70% of graduates - punctuation; 27.58% of graduates make more than two grammatical errors; 15, 69% of graduates - more than four speech errors. . In comparison with the results of the SIA in the Russian language in 2015, the practical literacy of students remains at the same level.
Brief meaningful analysis of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language Analysis of the performance of tasks with a short answer of the examination paper: Difficulties were caused by tasks that tested knowledge of such spelling and punctuation rules as: - spelling NE and NI; - spelling -Н- and -НН- in words of different parts of speech; - punctuation marks in a simple complicated sentence. - punctuation in a compound sentence and a simple sentence with homogeneous members; - lexical norms; - punctuation marks in a complex sentence with different types of connection; - functional-semantic types of speech
A brief meaningful analysis of the USE in the Russian language Conclusion on the level of readiness of students in the region to complete the tasks of part 1 of the examination work: Analysis of the results of Part 1 of the examination work allows us to state that the preparation in the subject as a whole is satisfactory: most of the graduates of the region have mastered the main components of the content of education in the Russian language at a basic level.
Brief meaningful analysis of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language Analysis of the performance of tasks with a detailed answer of the examination paper: K 1 (Formulation of the problem of the source text) - the majority of students (96.66%. Compared in 2014 - 98.2%). text K 2 (Comment on the problem) - 2 points for a comment were given only in 50.38% of works (Compare in 2014 - in 41.8% of works) K 3 (Formulation of the author's position on the problem) - in 2015 1 point for K 3 it was set at 91.54% (Compare: in 2014 - 95.6% of works) K 4 (Argument of one's own opinion) - the percentage of completion in the Vologda Oblast is 27.54%
A brief meaningful analysis of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language Analysis of the performance of tasks with a detailed answer of the examination paper: K 5 (Semantic integrity, speech coherence and consistency of presentation), K 6 (Accuracy and expressiveness of speech) Compared to previous years, the work has become more structured, they have less errors associated with paragraph division of the text, violation of logic. But a lot of clichéd texts appeared.
Brief meaningful analysis of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language Analysis of the performance of tasks with a detailed answer of the examination paper: K 7 - K 10 - practical literacy In 2015, the literacy of students was assessed, as in previous years, according to four criteria (spelling, punctuation, language and speech norms) , The level of spelling and especially punctuation literacy of graduates is low: K 7 -38, 58%; K 8 - 21, 64%; K 9 - 42, 22%; K 10 - 40, 80%
Choice of topic “Whoever says that it’s not scary in war knows nothing about war” (Yu. V. Drunina) - 53% of graduates What is more important: to love or be loved - 19% of graduates What events and experiences in life help a person grow up? - 11% of graduates How can the work of M. Yu. Lermontov be interesting to the modern reader? (Based on one or several works by M. Yu. Lermontov) - 11% of graduates Nature and the inner world of man: consonance and dissonance - 7% of graduates
Criteria for evaluating an essay Criterion No. 1 "Relevance to the topic" This criterion aims to check the content of the essay. The graduate discusses the proposed topic, choosing the path of its disclosure (for example, answers the question posed in the topic, or reflects on the proposed problem, or builds a statement based on theses related to the topic, etc.). “Failure” was set only if the essay did not correspond to the topic or it did not trace the specific purpose of the statement, i.e., the communicative intention (in all other cases, “pass” was set). Total examinees - 5198 Received "pass" - 5056 graduates Received "fail" - 142 graduates
Criteria for evaluating an essay Criterion No. 2 “Argumentation. Attracting literary material This criterion aims at testing the ability to use literary material (fiction, diaries, memoirs, journalism) to build a reasoning on the proposed topic and to argue one's position. “Failure” was set on the condition that the essay was written without the involvement of literary material, or the content of the work was significantly distorted in it, or literary works were only mentioned in the work, without becoming a support for reasoning (in all other cases, “pass” was set). Total examinees - 5198 Received "pass" - 4992 graduates Received "fail" - 206 graduates
Criteria for evaluating an essay Criterion No. 3 “Composition and logic of reasoning” This criterion aims to test the ability to logically build a reasoning on the proposed topic. The graduate argues the expressed thoughts, trying to maintain the ratio between the thesis and evidence. "Failure" was set on the condition that gross logical violations interfered with the understanding of the meaning of what was said or there was no thesis-proving part (in all other cases, a "pass" was given). Total examinees - 5198 Passed - 4948 graduates Passed - 250 graduates
Criteria for evaluating an essay Criterion No. 4 "The quality of written speech" This criterion aims to check the speech design of the text of the essay The graduate accurately expresses thoughts using a variety of vocabulary and various grammatical structures, if necessary, appropriately uses terms, avoids speech stamps "Failure" was set on the condition that poor speech quality, including speech errors, made it difficult to understand the meaning of the essay (in all other cases, a "pass" was given) Total examinees - 5198 Received a "pass" - 4194 graduates Received a "fail" - 1004 graduates
Criteria for evaluating an essay Criterion No. 5 "Literacy" This criterion allows you to evaluate the literacy of a graduate. "Failure" was given if grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors made in the essay made it difficult to read and understand the text (more than 5 errors per 100 words in total). Total examinees - 5198 Received "pass" - 3898 graduates Received "fail" - 1300 graduates
Exam results Number of participants - 5383 Number of papers marked "pass" - 5162 Number of papers marked "failed" - 221 (4% of the total number of graduates
MAIN CONCLUSIONS When paying attention to all types of speech activity, it is necessary first of all to solve the problem of introducing the student to reading. The reflection of the reader's experience can become the basis for preparing for the presentation, composition and performance of tasks for understanding the text. It is necessary to continue to use the text-centric approach in teaching the Russian language more widely, to actualize the problem of forming the reading competence of students. We recommend using texts of different styles, types of speech, the content of which is aimed at the spiritual and moral education of students, at expanding background knowledge. Comprehensive analytical work with the text will provide an opportunity to ensure the relationship between the study of new material and repetition in the classroom.
MAIN CONCLUSIONS When organizing the educational activities of students, special attention should be paid to the development of independent work skills. It is necessary to purposefully develop the dialogic and monologue speech of students in the lessons of the Russian language and literature. One of the main requirements in the organization of educational activities for the acquisition of language and literature should be constant attention to language meanings, literary concepts, students should realize the importance of theoretical knowledge for the successful formation of practical speech and analytical skills. The results of the OGE and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language, the final essay convince the teacher of the need to use modern methods of criteria-based testing of students' knowledge, skills and abilities in the work of the teacher. It is necessary to update the methodological methods for the formation of practical literacy of students in primary and secondary schools.
Forms of scientific and methodological support of the GIA and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language, the final essay in the 2015-2016 academic year In accordance with the List of instructions of the President of the Russian Federation, a set of measures has been developed for additional professional education of teachers of the Russian language and literature. Approved at a meeting of the working group with the participation of representatives of universities. A meaningful analysis of the results of the OGE and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language, the final essay was carried out. "Recommendations for improving the quality of teaching the Russian language, taking into account the results of the OGE", "Methodological recommendations for preparing students for the final essay in 2015" have been developed. Posted on the VIRO website. A discussion of the results of the final essay of 2014 was organized with the participation of representatives of universities and municipal tutors in the Russian language and literature. There was a discussion of the results of the OGE and the USE in the Russian language at the round table "Professional competence of a teacher as a factor in improving the quality of school philological education" as part of the August meeting. Teachers were informed about changes in documents and materials for the Unified State Examination and the OGE in September 2015 through the VIRO website (Section "Final Attestation"). A webinar "Final essay - 2015" was organized (lecturer A. G. Narushevich, head of the Russian language department of the Taganrog State Pedagogical Institute named after A. P. Chekhov, author of textbooks and teaching aids in the Russian language).
The main directions of scientific and methodological support of the GIA and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language in the 2014-2015 academic year Discussion of the results of the Unified State Examination and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language was organized at methodological associations of municipal districts and city districts. Action plans have been drawn up to improve the quality of teaching the Russian language in educational institutions of municipal districts and urban districts. More than 40 meetings are planned on the problem of preparing students for the OGE and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language. Analytical materials and plans of the Ministry of Defense are posted on the VIRO website in the "Final Attestation" section for the exchange of experience.
The main directions of scientific and methodological support of the State Academic Examination and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language in the 2014-2015 academic year It is planned to organize a discussion of the results of the Unified State Examination and the Unified State Examination, the final essay at a meeting of the All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Teachers of Literature and the Russian Language" with the participation of members of the Russian Language Council under the Governor of the Vologda Region . Conduct a seminar “Final essay in grade 11: assessment criteria, methods of preparing students” Organize a discussion on improving the quality of teaching the Russian language at a meeting of the Russian Language Council in February 2016. To conduct advanced training courses on the problems of preparing students for the OGE and the Unified State Examination in the Russian language, the formation of the reading competence of students, the methodology for the formation of practical in the first half of 2016. Within the framework of the courses, organize master classes of the best teachers. Conduct courses for the training of experts of the OGE in the Russian language. Continue summarizing the experience of teachers in preparing for the final certification in the Russian language.
In accordance with Part 5 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; No. 6, item 566; No. 19, item 2289 ; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53; Article 72) and subparagraph 5.2. 36 of the Regulations on the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 3, 2013 No. 466 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2013, No. 23, Art. 2923; No. 33, Art. 4386; No. 37, Art. 4702; 2014, No. 2, item 126; item 582; No. 27, item 3776), I order:
1. Approve the attached Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs.
2. Recognize invalid the order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated March 25, 2003 No. 1155 "On approval of the Regulations on the final state certification of graduates of higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation" (registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 5, 2003, registration No. 4490).
| Minister | D.V. Livanov |
Registration number 38132
Application
The procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs
(approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of June 29, 2015 No. 636)
1. The procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs establishes the procedure for organizing and conducting educational activities for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs (hereinafter - organizations, educational programs), state final certification of students (cadets) (hereinafter referred to as students, graduates), completing the development of state-accredited educational programs, including forms of state final certification, requirements for the use of training and education tools, communication facilities during the state final certification, requirements presented to persons involved in the state final certification, the procedure for filing and considering appeals, changing and (or) canceling the cut ltats of the state final certification, as well as the features of the state final certification for students from among persons with disabilities.
2. State final certification is carried out by state examination boards in order to determine the compliance of the results of mastering basic educational programs by students with the relevant requirements of the federal state educational standard or educational standard * (1) (hereinafter together - the standard).
3. A student who does not have academic debts and who has fully completed the curriculum or individual curriculum for the relevant educational program of higher education * (2) is allowed to the state final certification.
4. Ensuring the conduct of the state final certification for educational programs is carried out by organizations * (3).
5. Organizations use the means necessary for the organization of educational activities during the state final certification of students.
6. Students and persons involved in the state final attestation are prohibited from having and using means of communication during its conduct.
7. Persons mastering an educational program in the form of self-education or studying in an educational program of higher education that does not have state accreditation, have the right to externally pass the state final certification in an organization for an educational program that has state accreditation, in accordance with this Procedure * (4).
8. The state final certification for educational programs containing information constituting a state secret is carried out in compliance with the requirements provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation on state secrets.
9. It is not allowed to charge students for passing the state final certification * (5).
10. State final certification of learning organizations is carried out in the form of:
state exam;
defense of the final qualifying work (hereinafter together - state certification tests).
Specific forms of conducting the state final certification are established by organizations, taking into account the requirements established by the standard.
11. The state exam is held in one or more disciplines and (or) modules of the educational program, the results of the development of which are of decisive importance for the professional activities of graduates. The state examination is conducted orally or in writing.
12. Graduation qualification work is a work done by a student (several students together), demonstrating the level of preparedness of a graduate for independent professional activity.
13. The type of final qualifying work, the requirements for it, the procedure for its implementation and the criteria for its evaluation are established by the organization independently.
14. The volume (in credit units) of the state final certification, its structure and content are established by the organization in accordance with this Procedure.
15. The state final certification is carried out within the terms determined by the organization, but no later than June 30.
16. The results of each state attestation test are determined by the marks "excellent", "good", "satisfactory", "unsatisfactory". Grades "excellent", "good", "satisfactory" mean successful passing of the state attestation test.
17. Successful completion of the state final certification is the basis for issuing a student a document on higher education and on the qualification of the sample established by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation * (6).
18. By decision of the collegial management body of the organization, as well as in cases provided for by the Federal Law of November 10, 2009 No. 259-FZ "On Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University" * (7), persons who have successfully passed the state final certification are issued documents on education and qualifications, samples of which are independently established by organizations * (8).
19. Features of conducting state attestation tests using e-learning, distance learning technologies are determined by the local regulations of the organization. When conducting state attestation tests using e-learning, distance learning technologies, the organization ensures the identification of students and control over compliance with the requirements established by the specified local regulations.
20. To conduct the state final certification and conduct appeals based on the results of the state final certification, the organization creates state examination commissions and appeal commissions (hereinafter collectively - commissions). Commissions are valid during the calendar year.
21. Commissions are created in the organization for each specialty and area of training, or for each educational program, or for a number of specialties and areas of training, or for a number of educational programs.
22. The chairman of the state examination commission is approved no later than December 31, preceding the year of the state final certification:
a) for organizations that have the right to independently establish educational standards - by an administrative act of the organization;
b) for organizations that are under the jurisdiction of federal executive bodies, with the exception of organizations from among those specified in subparagraph "a" of this paragraph, by the founders of organizations on the proposal of organizations;
c) for organizations that are under the jurisdiction of the subjects of the Russian Federation, municipal organizations and private educational organizations - by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the proposal of organizations.
23. The organization approves the composition of the commissions no later than 1 month before the start date of the state final certification.
24. The chairman of the state examination commission is approved from among persons who do not work in this organization, who have the academic degree of doctor of science and (or) the academic title of professor, or who are leading specialists - representatives of employers or their associations in the relevant field of professional activity.
The head of the organization (the person performing his duties or the person authorized by the head of the organization - on the basis of the administrative act of the organization) is approved as the chairman of the appeal commission.
25. The chairmen of the commissions organize and control the activities of the commissions, ensure the unity of the requirements for students during the state final certification.
26. The composition of the state examination commission includes at least 4 people, of which at least 2 people are leading specialists - representatives of employers or their associations in the relevant field of professional activity (hereinafter referred to as specialists), the rest - persons related to the teaching staff of this organizations and (or) other organizations and (or) scientists of this organization and (or) other organizations with an academic title and (or) academic degree.
The appeal commission includes at least 4 people from among the persons belonging to the teaching staff of the organization and not included in the state examination commissions.
From among the persons included in the composition of the commissions, deputy chairmen of the commissions are appointed as chairmen of the commissions.
27. For the period of the state final certification to ensure the work of the state examination commission, from among the persons belonging to the teaching staff of the organization, scientists or administrative workers of the organization, its secretary is appointed as the chairman of the state examination commission. The Secretary of the State Examination Commission is not a member. The secretary of the State Examination Commission keeps minutes of its meetings, submits the necessary materials to the Appeal Commission.
28. The main form of activity of the commissions are meetings.
Meetings of the commissions are competent if at least two thirds of the members of the commissions participate in them.
The meetings of the commissions are held by the chairmen of the commissions, and in their absence - by the deputy chairmen of the commissions.
Decisions of the commissions are taken by a simple majority of votes of the members of the commissions participating in the meeting. In case of an equal number of votes, the chairperson has the casting vote.
29. Decisions taken by the commissions are documented in protocols.
The minutes of the meeting of the state examination commission for the admission of the state certification test reflect the list of questions asked to the student and the characteristics of the answers to them, the opinions of the members of the state examination commission on the level of preparedness of the student to solve professional problems identified during the state certification test, as well as the identified shortcomings in theoretical and practical training of the student.
The minutes of the meetings of the commissions are signed by the chairpersons. The protocol of the meeting of the State Examination Commission is also signed by the Secretary of the State Examination Commission.
The minutes of the meetings of the commissions are bound into books and kept in the archives of the organization.
30. The program of the state final certification, including the programs of state exams and (or) requirements for final qualification works and the procedure for their implementation, criteria for evaluating the results of passing state exams and (or) defending final qualification works, approved by the organization, as well as the procedure for filing and considering appeals are brought to the attention of students no later than six months before the start of the state final certification.
31. The state exam is conducted according to the program approved by the organization, containing a list of questions submitted for the state exam and recommendations for students on preparing for the state exam, including a list of recommended literature for preparing for the state exam.
Before the state exam, students are consulted on the issues included in the state exam program (hereinafter referred to as the pre-examination consultation).
32. The organization approves the list of topics for graduation qualification works offered to students (hereinafter referred to as the list of topics) and brings it to the attention of students no later than 6 months before the start date of the state final certification.
At the written request of the student (several students performing the final qualifying work together), the organization may, in the manner established by it, provide the student (students) with the opportunity to prepare and defend the final qualifying work on the topic proposed by the student (students), if the expediency of its development for practical application is justified in the relevant field of professional activity or at a specific object of professional activity.
For the preparation of the final qualifying work for the student (several students performing the final qualifying work together), the administrative act of the organization assigns the head of the final qualifying work from among the employees of the organization and, if necessary, a consultant (consultants).
33. Not later than 30 calendar days before the day of the first state certification test, the organization approves by an administrative act the schedule of state certification tests (hereinafter referred to as the schedule), which indicates the dates, time and place of the state certification tests and pre-examination consultations, and brings the schedule up to information of the student, members of the state examination commissions and appeal commissions, secretaries of the state examination commissions, supervisors and consultants of final qualifying works.
When forming the schedule, a break between state attestation tests lasting at least 7 calendar days is established.
34. After the completion of the preparation of the final qualifying work by the student, the head of the final qualifying work submits to the organization a written review of the work of the student during the preparation of the final qualifying work (hereinafter referred to as the review). In case of completion of the final qualifying work by several students, the head of the final qualifying work submits to the organization a review of their joint work during the preparation of the final qualifying work.
35. Graduation papers for master's and specialist's programs are subject to review.
To conduct a review of the final qualifying work, the specified work is sent by the organization to one or more reviewers from among persons who are not employees of the department, or the faculty (institute), or the organization in which the final qualifying work was completed. The reviewer analyzes the final qualifying work and submits to the organization a written review of the specified work (hereinafter referred to as the review).
If the final qualification work is of an interdisciplinary nature, it is sent by the organization to several reviewers. Otherwise, the number of reviewers is set by the organization.
36. The organization ensures that the student is familiarized with the feedback and review (reviews) no later than 5 calendar days before the day of defense of the final qualification work.
37. The final qualifying work, review and review (reviews) are submitted to the state examination commission no later than 2 calendar days before the day of defense of the final qualifying work.
38. The texts of final qualifying works, with the exception of texts of final qualifying works containing information constituting a state secret, are placed by the organization in the electronic library system of the organization and checked for the amount of borrowing. The procedure for placing texts of final qualifying works in the electronic library system of the organization, checking for the amount of borrowing, including content, identifying unauthorized borrowings is established by the organization.
Access of persons to the texts of final qualification works must be provided in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, taking into account the withdrawal of industrial, technical, economic, organizational and other information, including the results of intellectual activity in the scientific and technical field, on the methods of carrying out professional activities, which have actual or potential commercial value due to their unknown to third parties, in accordance with the decision of the copyright holder.
39. The results of the state attestation test, conducted orally, are announced on the day it is held, the results of the state attestation test, conducted in writing, on the next business day after the day it is held.
40. Students who did not pass the state final certification due to failure to appear at the state certification test for a good reason (temporary disability, performance of public or state duties, subpoena, transport problems (flight cancellation, lack of tickets), weather conditions or in other cases , the list of which is established by the organization independently), has the right to pass it within 6 months after the completion of the state final certification.
The student must submit to the organization a document confirming the reason for his absence.
A student who has not passed one state attestation test for a good reason is allowed to pass the next state attestation test (if any).
41. Students who have not passed the state certification test due to failure to appear at the state certification test for an unexcused reason or in connection with receiving an "unsatisfactory" grade, as well as students specified in paragraph 43 of this Procedure and who have not passed the state certification test in the period established for them term (due to failure to appear at the state attestation test or receiving an "unsatisfactory" grade), are expelled from the organization with the issuance of a certificate of study as having not fulfilled their obligations for the conscientious development of the educational program and the implementation of the curriculum.
42. A person who has not passed the state final certification may re-pass the state final certification no earlier than one year and no later than five years after the deadline for the state final certification, which was not passed by the student.
In order to re-pass the state final attestation, the specified person, upon his application, is reinstated in the organization for a period of time established by the organization, but not less than the period of time provided for by the calendar study schedule for the state final attestation for the relevant educational program.
When re-passing the state final certification, at the request of the student, by the decision of the organization, he may be assigned a different topic for the final qualifying work.
43. For disabled students, the state final certification is carried out by the organization, taking into account the peculiarities of their psychophysical development, their individual capabilities and health status (hereinafter referred to as individual characteristics).
44. When conducting the state final certification, the following general requirements are observed:
carrying out the state final certification for the disabled in the same classroom together with students who do not have disabilities, if this does not create difficulties for students when passing the state final certification;
the presence in the audience of an assistant (assistants) who provides students with disabilities with the necessary technical assistance, taking into account their individual characteristics (take a workplace, move around, read and complete an assignment, communicate with members of the state examination committee);
use of the technical means necessary for students with disabilities when passing the state final certification, taking into account their individual characteristics;
ensuring the possibility of unhindered access for students with disabilities to classrooms, toilets and other premises, as well as their stay in these premises (the presence of ramps, handrails, widened doorways, elevators, in the absence of elevators, the audience should be located on the first floor, the presence of special chairs and other devices) .
45. All local regulations of the organization on the issues of conducting the state final certification are brought to the attention of students with disabilities in an accessible form for them.
46. At the written request of a student with a disability, the duration of passing a state certification test by a student with a disability may be increased in relation to the established duration of its delivery:
the duration of passing the state exam, held in writing, - no more than 90 minutes;
the duration of the preparation of the student for the answer to the state exam, conducted orally, - no more than 20 minutes;
the duration of the student's speech during the defense of the final qualifying work - no more than 15 minutes.
47. Depending on the individual characteristics of students with disabilities, the organization ensures that the following requirements are met when conducting the state certification test:
a) for the blind:
assignments and other materials for passing the state attestation test are drawn up in Braille or in the form of an electronic document accessible using a computer with specialized software for the blind, or read out by an assistant;
written tasks are performed by students on paper in Braille or on a computer with specialized software for the blind, or dictated to an assistant;
if necessary, students are provided with a set of writing utensils and paper for writing in Braille, a computer with specialized software for the blind;
b) for the visually impaired:
assignments and other materials for passing the state attestation test are drawn up in an enlarged font;
individual uniform illumination of at least 300 lux is provided;
if necessary, students are provided with a magnifying device, it is allowed to use magnifying devices available to students;
c) for the deaf and hard of hearing, with severe speech impairments:
the availability of sound amplifying equipment for collective use is provided, if necessary, students are provided with sound amplifying equipment for individual use;
at their request, state attestation tests are carried out in writing;
d) for persons with disorders of the musculoskeletal system (severe disorders of the motor functions of the upper limbs or the absence of upper limbs):
written tasks are performed by students on a computer with specialized software or dictated to an assistant;
at their request, state attestation tests are conducted orally.
48. A student with a disability, no later than 3 months before the start of the state final certification, submits a written application on the need to create special conditions for him during the state certification tests, indicating the features of his psychophysical development, individual capabilities and health status (hereinafter referred to as individual characteristics). The application is accompanied by documents confirming that the student has individual characteristics (in the absence of these documents in the organization).
In the application, the student indicates the need (lack of need) for the presence of an assistant at the state certification test, the need (lack of need) to increase the duration of the state certification test in relation to the established duration (for each state certification test).
49. Based on the results of state certification tests, the student has the right to appeal.
50. The student has the right to file a written appeal with the Appeal Commission about the violation, in his opinion, of the established procedure for conducting the state certification test and (or) disagreement with the results of the state exam.
51. An appeal is filed by a student personally to the appeal commission no later than the next working day after the announcement of the results of the state certification test.
52. To consider the appeal, the secretary of the state examination commission sends to the appeal commission the minutes of the meeting of the state examination commission, the conclusion of the chairman of the state examination commission on compliance with procedural issues during the state certification test, as well as the written answers of the student (if any) (for consideration of the appeal on conducting state examination) or final qualifying work, review and review (reviews) (to consider an appeal for the defense of the final qualifying work).
53. The appeal is considered no later than 2 working days from the date of filing the appeal at a meeting of the appeal commission, to which the chairman of the state examination commission and the student who filed the appeal are invited.
The decision of the appeal commission is brought to the attention of the student who filed the appeal within 3 working days from the date of the meeting of the appeal commission. The fact of familiarization of the student who filed the appeal with the decision of the appeal commission is certified by the signature of the student.
54. When considering an appeal about a violation of the procedure for conducting a state attestation test, the appeal commission takes one of the following decisions:
on the rejection of the appeal, if the information contained in it about violations of the procedure for conducting the state final certification of the student was not confirmed and (or) did not affect the result of the state certification test;
on the satisfaction of the appeal, if the information contained in it about the violations of the procedure for conducting the state final certification of the student was confirmed and affected the result of the state certification test.
In the case specified in paragraph three of this paragraph, the result of the state attestation test is subject to cancellation, in connection with which the protocol on the consideration of the appeal is submitted to the state examination commission no later than the next business day for the implementation of the decision of the appeal commission. The student is given the opportunity to pass the state attestation test within the time limits established by the educational organization.
55. When considering an appeal about disagreement with the results of the state certification test, the appeal commission makes one of the following decisions:
on the rejection of the appeal and the preservation of the result of the state attestation test;
on the satisfaction of the appeal and the presentation of a different result of the state attestation test.
The decision of the appeal commission is submitted to the state examination commission no later than the next working day. The decision of the appeal commission is the basis for the cancellation of the previously issued result of the state attestation test and the issuance of a new one.
56. The decision of the Appeal Commission is final and not subject to revision.
57. The re-conduct of the state attestation test is carried out in the presence of one of the members of the appeal commission no later than July 15.
58. An appeal to re-conduct the state attestation test is not accepted.
______________________________
*(1) Part 4 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).
*(2) Part 6 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).
*(3) Paragraph 3 of Part 12 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2326; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289 ; No. 22, item 2769; No. 23, item 2933; No. 26, item 3388; No. 30, item 4263; 2015, No. 1, item 42; Item 53, item 72).
*(4) Part 3 of Article 34 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).
*(5) Part 8 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).
*(6) Part 4 of Article 60 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).
*(7) Part 5 of Article 4 of the Federal Law of November 10, 2009 No. 259-FZ "On Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2009, No. 46, Art. 5418, 2013, No. 19, item 2311, No. 27, item 3477).
*(8) Part 5 of Article 60 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).
Document overview
A procedure has been established for conducting state final attestation (SFA) for bachelor's, specialist's and master's programs.
A student who has completed the curriculum (including individual) for the relevant program and has no debts is allowed to the GIA.
Certification is carried out in the form of a state examination and defense of the final qualifying work. The state exam is taken in 1 or several disciplines and (or) modules of the educational program, the results of the development of which are of decisive importance for the professional activities of graduates. It may be oral or written. The list of questions submitted for the exam is established by the educational organization.
The type, topics, order of execution and criteria for evaluating final qualification works, requirements for them are also determined by the university. Graduation papers on master's and specialist's programs are reviewed.
Upon successful completion of the GIA, a document on higher education and qualifications is issued. Its sample is approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Moscow State University M.V. Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University have the right to establish their own samples of such documents.
Examination and appeal commissions are created to conduct the GIA and appeals based on its results. They are valid for a calendar year. It is established how they are formed and work.
30 days before the start of the certification tests, the university approves their schedule. The break between exams must be at least 7 days.
You can retake the GIA in a year, but not later than 5 years after its completion.
The features of the GIA of students with disabilities have been established.
Based on the results of the GIA, the student has the right to file an appeal. The procedure has been written.
The former procedure for conducting the final state certification of graduates of Russian universities is no longer valid.
What is the state certification of educational institutions? We will identify the main features of such a process, the algorithm of actions.
Option
State final certification is carried out according to the main educational programs. The main purpose of its implementation is to determine the level of training of graduates. There is a certain procedure for carrying out such a procedure, approved by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.
Varieties
Conducting the state final certification for graduates of the middle stage of education is carried out in the form of a unified state exam. In addition, since 2015, a final essay has been additionally introduced. There are certain rules and an algorithm for holding such events, which should be mentioned in more detail.
Final essay for graduates
State certification in this form was introduced last academic year. The expediency of introducing such a form was determined by the President of the country. The children are offered various topics on which they must write their essays in the form of reasoning (essay) for three academic hours. Evaluation of works is carried out according to five criteria. Three criteria must be used to qualify.
The minimum essay size is 250 words. Upon receipt of a failure in the spring of the current academic year, graduates are given the opportunity to rewrite the essay. Note that without a positive mark (offset) for this type of certification, graduates are deprived of the right to take compulsory subjects that give them the right to receive a certificate of secondary education.
Required subjects
State certification of 11th grade graduates involves passing two compulsory academic disciplines: mathematics and the Russian language. As for the rest of the subjects, the delivery of which is possible in the form of the exam, they are optional, chosen at the request of the student himself.
If a graduate passes one of the compulsory subjects as “unsatisfactory”, he receives the right to retake it within the time limits established by the USE schedule. Upon receipt of the mark "two" in two compulsory academic disciplines, retake is prohibited.
The graduate receives a certificate of completion of the course of study, but is not issued to him. He gets the right to retake the mandatory exams only after a year.
Electives
State certification of secondary school graduates involves the delivery of elective subjects that are included in the list of academic disciplines, the delivery of which is allowed in the form of the Unified State Examination. After the introduction of the basic and profile level in mathematics as an optional exam, children can take a complicated level in this subject. This is true for graduates who have chosen technical educational institutions to continue their education.
State certification in the form of the Unified State Examination is carried out in biology, chemistry, social science, a foreign language, physics, computer science, history, geography. Each subject has its own duration of the exam, and there are certain requirements.
Procedure
What is the peculiarity of the state final certification? Educational institutions must provide the regional center for assessing the quality of education with a complete database of graduates by February 1. In addition to the passport data of each child, the database contains additional subjects selected for delivery in the USE form. Each child writes an application addressed to the head of the educational institution, in which he indicates all the subjects, puts a personal signature.
The student's parents must also give their consent. After February 1, there must be a good reason for adding new academic disciplines to the database, while the child has the right to refuse to take optional subjects until the day of the exam itself.
On the day of the exam, a graduate with a passport comes to the point of passing the unified state exam, brings with him a Russian passport, a black (gel) pen.
Depending on the specifics of the subject being passed, additional subjects may be used in the exam. For the exam in chemistry and physics, for example, you can bring a non-programmable calculator. The graduate goes to the audience, he gives his personal belongings to the organizer, for the duration of the exam they are placed in a special safe.
Among the latest innovations is the use of surveillance cameras during the final certification. Any attempts to use the tips, mobile phone are recorded by the organizer in the protocol, the results of this student are canceled.
The results of the final certification can be found in the educational institution where the final certification took place. In addition, it is possible to find the results on the official website.
The program of state certification in all subjects, as well as the timing of the exams, the planned days for issuing results, are presented on the official website of the unified state exam. You can also learn them at a secondary school in which the graduate will pass the final certification.
How to challenge the results of the final certification
Those high school graduates who are not satisfied with the scores obtained on the exam can file an appeal. This must be done within three days after reviewing the results. You can submit an application at the general education institution where the student passed the final certification. If the commission decides to revise the results in the direction of their increase, then the graduate will receive additional points in the contested academic discipline.
Certification of graduates of the basic school
Ninth-graders pass the final certification in the form of the OGE. For them, subjects are mandatory: mathematics and Russian. In addition, they must choose two more items from the proposed list. The procedure for conducting the OGE is similar to the unified state exam, including the possibility of filing an appeal.
The State Final Attestation (SFA) is an integral part of the educational program of higher education (EP HE) and is organized for all graduates of the University in accordance with the Regulations on the State Final Attestation of Students of Educational Programs of Higher Education - Bachelor's, Specialist's and Master's Programs of the National Research University Higher School of Economics » on the final state certification of graduates of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, which regulates the procedure and rules for organizing and conducting the State Examination of students of educational programs of all forms of study at the Higher School of Economics, including its branches, as well as the procedure for creating and operating state examination commissions (SEC).
The GIA of students completing their studies in educational programs is mandatory (it is carried out for all educational programs that have state accreditation). A specific list of mandatory state attestation tests that are part of the State Academic Examination of students of an educational program is determined by the OS of HE, on the basis of which the educational program is implemented, in the section “Requirements for the structure of the program”.
The GIA may consist of one or more state attestation tests of the following types:
- state exam: final exam in a separate discipline; final interdisciplinary exam in the field of study (specialty);
- defense of the WRC (mandatory included in the GIA).
A student who has fully completed the curriculum or individual curriculum for the relevant educational program and does not have academic debts for all elements of the educational program is allowed to the GIA.
When conducting state attestation tests, the use of electronic means or remote technologies is allowed.
Basic information about the preparation and defense of the final qualifying work (WQR).
The procedure for creating appeal commissions (AC), organizing and conducting appeals is posted.
The procedure for re-passing state certification tests is posted.
Features of the organization of the GIA for students with disabilities are posted.
ATTENTION!
For members of the SEC and AC in the current Directory, a special section "Reference Materials for Members of the State Examination Commission" has been created, dedicated to the description of various procedures for organizing and conducting the GIA. If you are included by order in the SEC or AC, we strongly recommend that you familiarize yourself with the posted materials BEFORE starting your work in the SEC or AC.
The section contains the following materials:
- Local regulations on GIA
- General issues of the GIA
- The procedure for conducting state certification tests, including recommendations for actions in non-standard situations
- Procedure for detecting a disciplinary offense
- Procedure for organizing and conducting appeals
The site is closed, in order to enter it, you must enter the login and password from your personal account on the portal in the window that opens (they match the login and password from corporate mail). We kindly ask you not to disclose your username and password to third parties.
If for some reason you do not have a personal account on the HSE portal, you need to go to the page "Access to editing a personal page (creating a personal account on the portal)", fill out an application "for employees" and send it to . Please note that applications are only accepted from corporate mail addresses.
By the end of elementary school, namely, by the end of the 4th grade, teachers draw a line to all education, and this line is the GIA - the state final certification. GIA - almost the same exam. This is also a system of tests and tasks. Writing mathematics is mandatory, and the final tasks are quite difficult. That is why teachers pay (or should pay) attention to the thorough preparation for the GIA of fourth-graders throughout the last quarter. And to help both parents and teachers - our article. On this page we will collect assignments for the GIA of different years, test papers in mathematics that will help fourth-graders prepare for the upcoming final assessment. Children will not only consolidate their knowledge, but also learn how to fill out an examination form.
Any file can be downloaded and/or printed by clicking on the cover.
Maths. Final certification in elementary school. Morshneva L.G.
Tasks are given by options, each option in three parts. Each option is accompanied by an answer sheet. At the end there are answers to tasks for checking the student by the parent (teacher).
It is equally important, when preparing a student for the GIA, to pay attention to especially difficult tasks and work them out. Such tasks are collected in the manual
The most insidious tasks on tests in mathematics. Final examination. 4th grade. Uzorova O., Nefedova E.
A collection of the most necessary and difficult examples and tasks that are offered at the final tests in mathematics in grade 4. The questions cover all topics covered in elementary school.
Maths. Final certification for the course of elementary school: typical test tasks. Ilyashenko L.A. 2016
Preparation for the final complex work. Mathematics, work with information, reading grade 4. Exercise book for schoolchildren. Planet.
Maths. Final works based on a single text for the course of elementary school 2016. A.V. Volkov, V.V. Khvostin.
The notebook is designed to prepare 4th grade students to complete the final work for the elementary school course and contains material for testing knowledge and skills in mathematics. Includes 5 works in two versions. Each work consists of a single text and 16 tasks, during which you need to find and use information from the text. The test form will help teach children how to fill out such documents correctly, which will accompany them until graduation. The notebook also contains the answers to the tasks. The allowance complies with the Federal State Educational Standard.
