The sentence contains information, asks about it, or directs to action. Most often it has a basis and secondary members describing it. In order to assimilate or refresh the memory of a topic, it is useful to study examples of the grammatical analysis of a sentence in Russian.

Grammatical basis in parsing a sentence

The basis is quite logical in application. It consists of a subject that directly names a thing or phenomenon, and a predicate - an action performed or directed at an object.

The subject is always used in the initial form (nominative), but can be not only a noun. It could be:

• numeral - to indicate quantity, set, number (there were three in line; four was his best estimate);
• personal pronoun (he quietly walked along the corridor; we left the classroom);
• indefinite pronoun (someone was sitting in the room; something bothered me);
• negative pronoun (no one could stop them);
• adjective in the sense of a noun (the person in charge was appointed by the management; the duty officer kept order).

In the grammatical analysis of a sentence, it is customary to highlight the subject with an underline, and the predicate with a double underline.

The predicate is most often a verb, but has several types:

• simple verb, expressed by the verb in any mood (the dog ran down the alley; the student gets up early);
• compound verb, consists of an auxiliary verb (modal word) and an infinitive (she started running in the morning; I have to go to work);
• compound nominal, having a linking verb (most often - to be) and a nominal part (a student became a student; bread is their main food; three times two is six(the word "will" is omitted);

Completeness of the offer

Based on the composition of the basis, sentences are two-part, where both main members are present or one is implied (incomplete) (night has come; where is he(omitted "is") ?) , and one-part. The latter are:

• definitely personal, in which it is clear from the face of the verb who it is about (I do my best(I); let's go for a walk(we));
• indefinitely personal, expressed by the past tense verb in the plural (a floor below made a noise; somewhere in the distance they sang);
• generalized-personal, which attribute the action to everyone (often found in proverbs and sayings) (if you want to eat a fish, you need to climb into the water; you go and admire the view);
• impersonal, implying no object (it got dark; he was very sorry; it was cold in the room).

Secondary, but no less important

To give detailed information, the object and action are supported by third-party words and constructions. They are:

When performing a grammatical analysis of a sentence, they must also be taken into account. If there are minor members, the proposal is considered widespread, respectively, without them - non-common.

Complicated sentences - it's not difficult at all

Various plug-in components complete the offer by increasing the amount of information. They are embedded between the main and secondary members, but are already defined as a separate part, which goes as a separate paragraph in the grammatical analysis of the sentence. These components can be removed or replaced without losing the meaning of the text. Among them:

• separate definitions applicable to an object member (describe a property, stand out as a definition), are participial phrases (the kettle, which was warming on the stove, whistled sharply; the road led to a house standing in the forest);
• isolated circumstances (highlighted as a circumstance) are adverbial phrases (he ran, stumbling over stones; looking wary, the dog held out its paw);
• homogeneous members of a sentence - perform the same function and always ask the same question (were scattered on the floor(what?) books, notebooks, notes(homogeneous subject); on weekends we only(what they were doing?) sleeping and walking(homogeneous predicate); he looked at(whom?) mother and sister(homogeneous addition));
• address to someone, which is always separated by a comma and is an independent member of the sentence (my son, you did the right thing; You, Andrei, misunderstood me);
• introductory words (probably, perhaps, finally, etc.) (I probably got excited; tomorrow, most likely, it will be hot).

How to make a grammatical analysis of a sentence, taking into account all the components?

For parsing, a clear algorithm has been created that does not cause difficulties if you know all the above constructions and components of the proposal. Among them, simple and complex ones stand out - the order of analysis is slightly different for them. The following is a grammatical analysis of sentences with examples for individual cases.

Simple sentence

At the beginning of autumn, covered with a golden carpet, the city alleys whimsically shimmer.

1. Define the main members. The basis should be one, as in this example: alleys- subject, shimmer- predicate.

2. Select minor members: (when?) at the beginning of autumn- circumstance (what?) covered with golden carpet- separate definition, (how?) whimsically- circumstance (what?) urban- definition.

3. Define parts of speech:

At the beginning of the noun. autumn n. , covered with golden adj. carpet n. , bizarrely overflow urban adj. alleys n.

4. Describe the signs:

• the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative);
• intonation (exclamatory, non-exclamatory);
• on the basis (two-part, one-part - indicate which one);
• completeness (complete, incomplete)
• by the presence of secondary (common, non-common);
• complicated (if yes, then by what) or not complicated;

The characteristic of this is non-exclamatory, two-part, complete, widespread, complicated by a separate definition.

This is what a complete grammatical analysis of a sentence looks like.

Difficult sentence

Since a complex sentence includes two or more simple ones, it is quite logical to parse them separately, but the parsing algorithm is still different. The grammatical analysis of a sentence in Russian is ambiguous. Compound sentences related to simple ones are:

An example of parsing a compound sentence

In the family, regardless of age, everyone was very busy, but on weekends everyone got together at one big table.

1. All bases are highlighted. There are several of them in a complex sentence: everyone- subject, been busy- compound nominal predicate; all- subject, were going- predicate.
2. Define parts of speech.

In the pr. family, noun. , regardless of from pr. age n. , each is a place. was ch. very nar. busy app. , nose. on pr. weekend adj. all place. were going to for pr. large adj. table su sch.

1. Find out if there is an alliance. Here - "but". So the proposal is allied.
2. It is possible to characterize by the position of simple ones if there is a union (paragraph 2). This example is a compound sentence, the simple ones are equivalent in it (that is, if you wish, you can divide it into two independent ones). In the case of non-union, this item is not indicated.
3. Make a general description: narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied, compound.
4. Disassemble simple inside separately:

• in the family, regardless of age, everyone was very busy (narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, full, common, complicated by a separate definition of "regardless of age")a
• on weekends everyone gathered at a large table

Complex sentence

The algorithm will be similar, only with the indication of the subordinating union. It is also part of the composition. You also need to highlight the main thing and find out how the subordinate clauses (parentheses) are “attached” to it.

This is a kind of submission, not a mandatory item, but it is also often taken into account.

The main thing to remember is that grammatical and syntactic analysis are synonyms. The meeting of one of the words in the task should not be frightening, since the topic is quite general and quickly digestible. For foreigners, it is difficult because of the great variability, but that's what makes the Russian language beautiful.

Remember:

Member of the proposal		Indicates/shows	Answers the questions	emphasized
Subject	main members of the proposal	who or what the sentence is about	who? what?
Predicate		names what the object does, its state, what it is	what is he doing? what have you been doing? what will do? what?
Definition	minor members of the sentence	object attribute	which? which? which? which? whose? whose?
Addition		what object or phenomenon is directed action	whom? what? to whom? what? whom? what? by whom? how? about whom? about what?
Circumstance		how the action is performed, when the action is performed, where the action is performed, for what reason the action is performed, for what purpose the action is performed	where? where? when? where? why? why? And How?

Write out an offer.

Do it like this : With high mountains ran voiced streamlets.

1. Basis of the offer:

the proposal refers to streamlets, hence, streamlets - is the subject

ran, hence, ran - is a predicate.

2. There are minor members in the proposal.

I ask a question from the subject:

streamlets what kind?- voiced is a definition.

I ask a question from the predicate:

ran where? - from the mountains is a circumstance of place.

from the mountains what? - high is a definition.

39. Scheme for parsing a sentence (syntactic parsing).

I. Type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement.

II. Type of sentence by intonation.

III. The basis of the sentence (subject and predicate).

IV. Type of proposal by the presence of secondary members.

V. Secondary members of the proposal.

Write out an offer.

Do it like this : With high mountains ran voicedstreamlets. (Narrative, unexclaimed, circ.)

This offer

I. Narrative.

II. Non-exclamatory.

III. Basis of the proposal:

the proposal refers to streamlets, hence, streamlets - is the subject

brooks are said to be ran, hence, ran - is a predicate.

IV. The sentence has minor members, so it is common.

V. I ask a question from the subject:

streamlets what kind?- voiced is a definition.

I ask a question from the predicate:

ran where? - from the mountains is a circumstance of place.

I ask a question from the secondary members of the proposal:

From the mountains what? - high is a definition.

Remember:

III. Punctuation

40. Punctuation marks at the end of sentences (.?!).

Write the sentence correctly. Come up with your own or find a sentence with the same sign in the textbook. Underline the punctuation mark.

Do it like this : Glory to our Motherland ! Glory to Labor !

41. Homogeneous members of the proposal.

Write out an offer. Put the signs right. Underline the homogeneous parts of the sentence. Draw a proposal outline.

Do it like this : Rooks, starlings and larks fled to warmer climes. (Oh, oh and oh)

Punctuation marks for homogeneous members:

Oh yes (=and) Oh

Oh yes (= but) Oh

and oh and oh and oh and oh

or O, or O, or O, or O

Oh and oh and oh and oh

42. Complicated sentence.

Write the correct sentence. Emphasize grammatical basics. Draw diagrams.

Do like this:

dormant fish under the water, resting catfish gray-haired.

[ ], [ ].

43. Offers with direct speech.

Write the correct sentence. Make a diagram.

Do it like this :

1) Oleg reassured his mother: "Everything will be fine."

2) He shouted: "Forward, guys!"

3) He asked: "Where are you from, boy?"

4) "I won't betray you," Ivan promised.

5) "Fire!" Tanya shouted.

6) "Who was it?" Olya asked.

7) "I'm a doctor," he said, "I'm on duty today."

"P, - a, - p."

8) "Our presence is necessary," Petrov finished. "Leaving in the morning."

"P, - a. - P."

9) "Why at five?" the brother asked. "It's very early."

"P? - a. - P."

10) "Well, great! - exclaimed Anya. - Let's go together."

"P! - a. - P."

11) "He is from our group," Ivan said. "Sit down, Peter!"

"P, - a. - P!"

FOR TEACHER AND PARENTS

"Memo on the performance of work on errors in the Russian language" consists of three sections: "Spelling rules", "Types of parsing", "Punctuation".

In the first and third sections, instructions are given on what operations and in what sequence students need to perform when working on mistakes. In order for the student to quickly and easily find the required spelling in the memo, each rule has its own serial number.

We propose to work on the memo in the following way. To the traditional notation of errors in the margins, attribute the number of the spelling placed in the memo. After the verified work, skip two lines and indicate these numbers on subsequent lines.

The student, having received a notebook, must complete the work on the mistakes strictly according to the memo. The teacher checks and evaluates each work, while taking into account the correctness and accuracy of the correction.

For example: there is a heavy frost outside - in the fields the student sees | No. 20. He opens a memo book and reads the algorithm of work:

№20 Moreau h– moro hs.

Thus, the main types of independent work of students on mistakes are:

Self-correction (then you can offer self-search) of errors;

Independent writing out words in which a mistake is made;

Selection of test words;

Repetition of rules.

Considering the need for continuity in the primary and secondary levels of education, when compiling the third section “Types of parsing” (morphemic, phonetic, morphological, syntactic), we relied on a textbook for the 5th grade of educational institutions, the authors T.A. Ladyzhenskaya, M.T. Baranov, L.A. Trostentsova and others.

"Reminder on doing work on mistakes in the Russian language" can be used in educational work on any elementary school program, both in group work and in individual, independent work of the student in the classroom or at home.

Literature

1. Russian language: grade 3: comments on the lessons / S.V. Ivanov, M.I. Kuznetsova.- M.: Ventana-Graf, 2011.-464 p.- (Primary school of the XXI century).

2. Russian language: Theory: Textbook for 5-9 cells. general education textbook institutions /V.V. Babaitseva, L.D. Chesnokova - M.: Enlightenment, 1994.-256 p.

3. Russian language: textbook for grade 5. general education institutions / T.A. Ladyzhenskaya, M.T. Baranov, L.A. Trostentsova and others - M .: Education, 2007.-317 p.

4. Reference book for elementary grades. A guide for students in grades 3-5, their parents and teachers. /T.V. Shklyarova - M.: "Literate", 2012, 128 p.

A sentence is a grammatical unit that forms a statement - a message, a question, a motivation. It has a grammatical basis, consisting of the main members of the sentence (subject and predicate) or one of them. Depending on this, primitive sentences are divided into one-part and two-part sentences. How to parse them?

Instruction

1. Highlight the grammatical basis of the sentence. The subject can be expressed by a noun in the nominative case, a pronoun-noun, a numeral, an indefinite form of a verb, any part of speech in the meaning of a noun, as well as a phrase that is integral in meaning. Predicates by type are divided into primitive, combined verbal and combined nominal.

2. Underline the secondary parts of the sentence, if any. These include definitions (an appendix is ​​a variation), which may or may not be consistent; additions (direct or indirect); circumstances (time, place, mode of action, etc.). Make a summary of the prevalence (non-proliferation) of the proposal.

3. Determine the completeness of the sentence: complete or incomplete - by the presence or partial absence of all the necessary members of this sentence construction.

4. Specify the offer type. If the grammatical basis is complete, i.e. consists of a subject and a predicate, then the sentence is two-part. Offers with one main member are called one-part.

5. If the sentence is one-part, determine its type: a) denominative - a sentence in which only one main member is the subject. b) definite-personal - a one-part sentence with a predicate, an expressed verb in the form of 1 or 2 persons of the true or future tense. c) indefinitely -personal - a one-part sentence in which the verb-predicate is in the form of the 3rd person plural of the true or future tense, as well as in the form of the plural of the past tense or conditional mood. d) generalized-personal. In such a sentence, the predicate can be expressed by a verb in the form of the 2nd person of the singular person, occasionally in the form of the 1st or 3rd person of the plural person.

When schoolchildren in Russian language lessons start parsing suggestions, they are obliged to characterize it by the presence and number of main members suggestions. In the event that there is only a subject or a predicate, they will also need to name view one-component suggestions .

Instruction

1. Define the grammatical basis suggestions(subject and predicate).

2. Pay attention to whether there are both main members in the sentence or only one of them (subject or predicate). So, in the sentence “Friends had a joyful time during a trip to the mountains”, there is a subject “friends” and a combined predicate “spent time”. Such a proposal is called a two-part proposal. But in the sentence “Help a friend do his homework” there is only a combined verbal predicate “help him do it”. It is one-piece.

3. Find out exactly which main member (subject or predicate) is in a one-part sentence. Say, in the sentence "Early morning" you will be able to find only the subject. Such syntactic constructions are called one-part, nominal suggestions mi.

4. Keep in view y, that a sentence in which there is only a predicate can be both definitely-personal, and indefinitely-personal, generalized-personal, and even impersonal.

5. Determine in what person and tense the verb that is the predicate is used. To do this, try to substitute pronouns for it. If you need the pronouns “I”, “we”, then this means that the verb is used in the form of the first person, if the pronouns “you”, “you” are in the form of the second person, and if “he”, “she”, “ it" or "they" - in the form of the third person.

6. If you have determined that in a one-part sentence a verb that is a predicate is used in the first or second person, in real or in the past tense, then such a sentence will be definitely personal. In it, the lack of a subject does not interfere with understanding the meaning suggestions. For example, in the sentence “I love a thunderstorm in early May,” the verb “love” is used in the first person (I love) and in real time (the action is happening at this moment). There is no subject in this sentence. Therefore, it is definitely personal.

7. If you find during the review suggestions that there is only a predicate (verb) in the form of a third person, true or past tense, in the plural, know that this is a one-part indefinite personal sentence.

8. If you have determined that the predicate is a verb in the form of an exceptional number, true tense, and the action is generalized (applies to everyone), then conclude that this is a one-part generalized personal sentence. For example, in the sentence “As you sow, so shall you reap,” the verbs “sow” and “reap” are in the form of an exceptional number. second person (you will sow and you will reap). This is a generalized offer.

9. Remember that in an impersonal sentence, the predicate is either an impersonal verb, a category of state (light, drizzle, chills, etc.), or words with a negative meaning (no), or an indefinite form of the verb (infinitive). In such syntactic constructions, there is no and cannot be a subject, and it is unthinkable to determine the face of verbs. Let's say, in the sentence “I was shivering more and more for the 2nd day in a row”, the word “shivered” is a category of state. It is impossible to identify his face. There is no subject in the sentence and you will not be able to restore it. Consequently, it is a one-part, impersonal sentence.

Tip 3: How to define a vaguely personal sentence

A sentence expresses a message, a prompt, or a question. Two-part sentences have a grammatical basis consisting of a subject and a predicate. The grammatical basis of a one-part sentence is represented by either the subject or the predicate.

Instruction

1. Among one-part sentences, denominative and verbal ones are distinguished. In denominative sentences, there is only a subject, but there is no predicate: “Siberian winter”. Verbs are divided into definite-proper, indefinite-proper and impersonal.

2. All verbal one-part sentences have a predicate but no subject. Moreover, in a definite personal sentence, the form of the verb and the meaning of the message suggest that the action refers to a specific person: “I like to read books”, “Find the right solution”, “Take care of the dress again, and honor from a young age.”

3. The verb can be in the form of the first or second person, singular or plural, indicative or imperative. The first person means that the verb question is asked from the pronouns "I", "we"; second person - from the pronouns "you", "you". The imperative inclination encourages action, the indicative primitive informs information.

4. In an indefinite personal sentence, the action is performed by indefinite or unmarked persons. This action is significant in itself. The verb is in the form of the third person plural of the original or past tense. Examples: “The news is shown on TV”, “On Friday they announced the trouble”, “The poster was removed from the door.” To get a verb in the third person plural form, ask a question for the pronoun "they".

5. In an impersonal sentence, the predicate indicates a process or state that in the thesis does not depend on the energetic figure: “It got dark outside”, “It’s stuffy in the room”, “It smells of wormwood in the field”, “This was previously agreed upon”. The predicate is expressed by an impersonal verb (it got dark), an impersonal form of a personal verb (smells), an adverb (stuffy) and a short passive participle (it was agreed). Adverbs and short participles can go with the linking verb "to be" or without it. Also, the predicate in an impersonal sentence can be expressed by the words "no", "was not": "There are no gaps in skills more huge."

Related videos

Note!
Do not confuse one-part sentences with incomplete two-part sentences. The omitted main member of a two-part incomplete sentence is easily restored from the context and speech environment. Let's say if the person doing the action is named in the previous sentences.

Pronouns own some signs of nouns, adjectives and numerals. The personal morphological category of this part of speech is the value category. Knowing how to establish a category, the grammatical meaning of a pronoun will help to correctly determine its signs. Perform morphological analysis in accordance with the plan.

Instruction

1. Pronouns are used to indicate an object or person, sign or number, without naming them. Similar to the remarkable words they replace, pronouns own a number of morphological categories, act as the main or secondary member of the sentence. Pronouns are characterized by the properties of nouns, adjectives or numerals. Install all available signs, following a specific procedure.

2. Find the word from which it is allowed to ask a question to the pronoun. Write out the phrase corresponding to the scheme: “main word + dependent pronoun”. Having indicated the grammatical response of the pronoun, put it in its original form. Find out what nominal part of speech the word replaced by the pronoun belongs to. If it correlates with nouns or numerals, the nominative case will determine the original form. For pronouns-adjectives, it corresponds to the nominative case, masculine gender, exceptional number.

3. Look at the pronoun all the available signs. Start with continuous, immutable collations. Determine which category it belongs to. In accordance with the value issued: proper, relative, interrogative, reflexive, negative, indefinite, possessive, attributive and demonstrative. Own differ from pronouns-nouns belonging to other grammatical categories, invariable signs of person and number (in the 1st and 2nd person).

4. Then proceed to the consideration of signs that can change. Set the case form for all pronouns. Other acceptable non-permanent morphological collations will depend on grammatical meaning and rank. If you have pronouns that replace adjectives, or your own (3 persons), first determine the category of the number. After that, it is allowed to find out what gender the pronoun belongs to (this sign is determined only in the exceptional number).

5. This question from the main word will help you decide whether the main or secondary member is the pronoun in the sentence. This part of speech performs various syntactic functions in the sentence. Traditionally, the subject and object in the sentence are pronouns-nouns and numerals, and the definition - pronouns-adjectives.

6. Consider an example of a morphological analysis of a pronoun according to an established plan: The sentence “Look at yourself from the side” has in its composition the pronoun “yourself”, indicating a person.I. (Look "at whom?") - at yourself - seats.II. N. f. - myself. Fast. - return; non-post. - wine. item III. Supplement (underlined by a dotted line).

Note!
The nominative case is absent in the negative pronoun "no one" and the reflexive - "myself". The gender of pronouns-adjectives is established only in cases of their use in the exceptional number.

Related videos

Note!
Distinguish from one-part sentences two-part incomplete ones, in which there is also one main member of the sentence. The sentence is two-part incomplete if the predicate is expressed by the verb in the form of: a) indicative mood, past tense, feminine or masculine gender, exceptional number; b) conditional mood; c) indicative mood, true or future tense, 3rd person, exceptional number.

Helpful advice
In a difficult sentence, by composition, determine any primitive sentence that is part of a difficult one.

One of the basic forms of syntactic analysis is the parsing of a sentence by the members of the sentence. This allows you to track the nature of the links between different CLs of the sentence, determine the specifics of intonation, and also find the phrases used in the sentence. Despite the fact that such an analysis is taught from school, many people encounter a number of difficulties when performing such an analysis, and turn to the network for help. Below I will consider the scheme of such an analysis of the CL of a proposal, give the features of its key steps, and also tell you if there are online resources that can help us in performing analyzes of this type.

Why parse a sentence into parts of speech?

It is important for the formation and training of spelling literacy in people, honing the necessary spelling skills.

This is especially important in today's educational environment, when:

• the average level of independent reading falls;
• there is an insufficient number of manuals on the method of spelling;
• the general level of cognitive interest among students decreases.

When you regularly parse a proposal by members, you perform several basic tasks at once:

1. Get acquainted directly with a lot of syntactic constructions in sentences;
2. Learn to express your thoughts both directly and metaphorically, hone your logical thinking;
3. Express your thoughts both orally and in writing;
4. Prevent the appearance of various speech errors;
5. Learn to ask the right questions.

According to the existing methodology, syntactic parsing of a sentence is possible in three main forms:

• Formal form (members of the proposal are distinguished by questions);
• Semantic form (subject, object, predicate, etc. are distinguished);
• Communicative form (theme and rheme will stand out, that is, given and new information).

In this case, sentences are usually analyzed in which their formal structure does not conflict with the communicative and semantic structure.

How to Parse a Sentence

The implementation of this analysis involves following the methodological template, which consists of the following:

1. We determine whether this sentence is simple or complex (that is, how many grammatical bases are in it - if one, then simple, if two or more - complex);
2. We identify the sentence by the purpose of its statement (it is narrative, interrogative or incentive);
3. What is it in terms of intonation (exclamatory or non-exclamatory).

If this sentence is simple, then we determine its further typology:

1. We establish whether our proposal is widespread or non-common (that is, if it has only main members, then it is non-common, and if, in addition to the main members, there are secondary ones, it is common);
2. We analyze it into main (subject and predicate) and secondary members of the sentence (definition, addition, circumstance), identify what part of speech they are expressed;
3. We single out homogeneous members of the sentence (if any), that is, are there members that answer the same question and are associated with the same word.

If this sentence is complex, then:

Features of parsing

When performing this type of parsing, it is necessary to remember that:

• Any grammatical concept is expressed by the unity of its grammatical features;
• One word cannot be different members of a sentence;
• The greatest difficulty is the differentiation of secondary members of the sentence being analyzed, which are expressed by a noun.

Online resources for parsing proposals by members

In Runet, there are practically no network resources that allow you to parse a sentence online. This is primarily due to the complexity of developing such tools. For example, the same word in a sentence can have a different semantic load. At the same time, in the English-speaking segment, there are a number of such services that allow you to parse English-language sentences by sentence members online.

In particular, I would like to draw the reader's attention to the following resources:

Let's now take a look at a few proposals for CL in practice.

Example #1

“White, yellow and blue butterflies fluttered over the dandelions.”

This offer:

• simple;
• has a narrative character (tells us about something);
• common (has members other than the main one);
• non-exclamatory;
• complicated by uniform definitions.

In terms of parts of speech, it looks something like this:

Example #2

“Children were decorating a New Year tree, my wife was preparing a festive dinner, my mother helped her.”

This offer:

• complex (has three grammatical bases);
• has a narrative character;
• common;
• non-exclamatory.

The parts of speech are as follows:

Example #3

"The holidays have arrived."

This is a simple declarative sentence, it is also not widespread and non-exclamatory.

Conclusion

The online resources available on the net do not provide a full opportunity to analyze the proposals for the CL. Therefore, it is recommended to use the methodology given in the article, and hone your own knowledge, skills in parsing the sentences you need.

First, let's deal with the terminology: for a sentence, there is only parsing. In this analysis, the subject, predicate and other members of the sentence are indicated. You can specify the part of speech only for a word. However, parsing a sentence often involves the task of specifying the part of speech for each word. And there are services where you can enter either the whole sentence or one word at a time. And they give you information on parts of speech for each word.

goldlit

In this service, you can enter a whole sentence and get a morphological analysis of each word. Which, of course, includes a part of speech. For example:

As you can see, the detected word is put in the initial form and the following is indicated for it:

• Initial form.
• Part of speech.
• Grammar - what is indicated here depends on the part of speech.
• Word forms.

We are interested in the part of speech. But be careful, the service is not smart enough to always correctly determine it. For example, the particle "already". In the above sentence, this is a particle, and not a noun "already". There is no talk of snakes here. So the results of word-by-word parsing of the sentence must be manually rechecked. In this sense, it does not outperform services where one word is entered. If he could determine the meaning from the context, he would win, but otherwise he would not. So pay attention to the usual online morphological parsing services, they work the same way. I have one such service is also described further.

Let's take another example, the declarative sentence "There is no time."

What will Goldlit tell us?

initial form: TIME
Part of speech: personal verb
Grammar: second person, active voice, singular, transitive, imperfective, imperative (imperative)

That is, he understood the word "time" as the verb "time". Which is clearly not true. Further, the second meaning is indicated:

initial form: TIME
Part of speech: noun
Grammar: singular, inanimate, genitive, neuter
Forms: time, time, time, times, times, times, times, times

That's right, noun. In general, be careful when using such services.

To use the service:

1. Go to http://goldlit.ru/component/slog
2. Enter an offer.
3. You will receive a morphological analysis of each word.

Wikislovo

You can only enter one word here. At the same time, they will additionally tell you which part of the sentence this word can be. Either one option, or, if there are several, then they write it that way. Parsing the word "time" looks something like this:

But the analysis of the word "adding". Here the member of the proposal is already clearly indicated. This is a circumstance. Because gerunds are always circumstances.

Morphologyonline

I like this service even more: the design is cleaner, there are fewer ads, and it works just as well.

To use:

1. Go to the site http://morphologyonline.ru/
2. Enter a word in the empty field.
3. Click the Parse button.

You will get parsing:

Here the third line is "Syntactic Role". This is the same as "Sentence member" in the Wiktionary service.

And the second line is "Morphological features", which in the first line are designated as "Grammar". Here they are spelled out better, as they are divided into permanent and non-permanent. It means that depending on the form of the word, some signs may change, but some may not. For example, the noun "time" is always common noun, inanimate, neuter and 2 declensions. These are permanent signs. And the case and number can change depending on the form of the word: “no time”, “give time”, “from ancient times”. It's genitive, dative, genitive again. And singular, again singular and plural. What form of the word "time" you use, such a case and number will be. Therefore, these are inconsistent signs.

Morphological vs Morphemic

Morphological parsing of a word should be distinguished from morphemic parsing. The morphemic analysis of a word includes the definition of the root, suffix, ending, stem of the word. There are also many services for morpheme parsing, they are described.

If you need to determine not only the parts of speech of all the words of a sentence, but also analyze the sentence as a whole: according to the purpose of the statement, emphasize the members of the sentence, then use cheat sheets, of which there are plenty on the Internet. In some places you can even practice online. I have a comparison of similar services.