29/09/2014

The legendary cruiser Aurora, which went to Kronstadt for repairs, reminded the public about itself and its sacramental question: did it shoot or not shoot. The official version of his participation in the storming of the Winter Palace has changed so often that it is almost impossible to distinguish truth from lies in it. In this sense, it is not so much the answer itself that is interesting, but rather its evolution over time.

26 October 1917, on the morning after the capture of Zimny ​​by the Bolsheviks, none of the actors seemed to have any doubts that the Aurora was firing live shells at Zimny. Izvestia, at that time still not under the control of the Bolsheviks, on the day after the coup, presented the chronicle of the events of the past day in this way. “In view of the information received in the City Duma about the shelling of the Winter Palace from the Aurora cruiser, the Duma majority sent three delegations: to the Soviet of Workers 'and Soldiers' Deputies, to the Provisional Government and to the Aurora cruiser in order to avoid bloodshed. The meeting was adjourned until the return of the delegation.” This was some time before the assault. The delegations returned with nothing. Then the Duma managed to establish a telephone connection with the Provisional Government. The Winter Palace is under fire from the cruiser Aurora.

The newspaper described the night assault itself as follows: “As they say, at 9 o’clock in the evening, 4 destroyers and the training ship Verny arrived in Petrograd from Helsingfors. Together with the cruiser Aurora, they approached the Winter Palace and opened fire. Then the troops, standing on the side of the military revolutionary committee (the structure of the Bolsheviks, which was at the head of the coup. - A.M.) launched an attack on the palace. Junkers answered from the palace only occasionally.

However, as Izvestia writes, the Second Congress of Soviets, which opened immediately after the Bolsheviks seized power, was attended by “representatives of the Aurora cruiser and the Zabiyaka destroyer, who said that they fired at the Winter Palace only with blanks. On the cruiser, one was accidentally killed. Not satisfied with the performance, the crew of the Aurora wrote an open letter: “The press writes that the Aurora opened fire on the Winter Palace, but do the reporters know that the cannon fire we opened would not have left stone unturned, not only from the Winter Palace? palace, but also the streets adjacent to it. It is a common device of the bourgeois press to throw dirt and lack of solidity into the facts of incidents, to intrigue the working proletariat. As for the shots from the cruiser, only one blank shot was fired, indicating a signal for all ships standing on the Neva, and calling them to vigilance and readiness. The letter was published in Pravda on 27 October.

Why was this official denial necessary? The fact is that the Leninists who seized power were in political isolation. Not only the few liberals who survived until October 1917, but practically all socialist parties frankly called them pogromists. Therefore, in the first days, the Bolsheviks did their best to improve their image: they emphasized the “practical bloodlessness” of the coup (the term “coup”, by the way, they themselves used), assured that they would not smash embassies, etc. In the same row, the story of blank shots also rises. Moreover, the Winter Palace was then not only a refuge for capitalist ministers, but also a military hospital in which wounded comrade soldiers lie.

However, with the defeat of all enemies, the need for modesty disappears, instead of it there is a need for revolutionary pathos. On the occasion of the 11th anniversary of October, the Ogonyok magazine publishes a photograph of the room with a small hole in the wall and the caption: “One of the rooms of the Winter Palace with a wall pierced by a volley from the Aurora in the October days of 1917.” The Short Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, published in 1938, illuminates this story with one evasive sentence: “The cruiser Aurora, with the thunder of its cannons aimed at the Winter Palace, heralded on October 25 the beginning of a new era.”

Post-war vegetarian communists could only in a nightmare see how the legendary cruiser Aurora fires live shells at the immortal creation of Rastrelli. So the version of the blank shot became canonical.

When all the values ​​of the Soviet government were ridiculed and trampled into the mud, and the classic photograph of the storming of the Winter Palace turned out to be a frame from Eisenstein's film, the Aurora also fell under suspicion. Hesitantly returned version of the shooting combat. Now she is again not in honor, although for a different reason: the legendary Russian cruiser, who once fought with the Japanese and twice with the Germans, could not shoot at the immortal creation of Rastrelli.

Logic usually helps answer the riddles of history, but not in this case. Theoretically, standing in front of the Nikolaevsky Bridge, the Aurora could hit the eastern wall of the Winter Palace, which the Admiralty does not completely cover from it. On the other hand, the Peter and Paul Fortress was in the hands of the rebels, from which it is much more convenient to shoot at Zimny. The story with a blank shot as a signal for the beginning of an uprising is all the more illogical: the one who brought the soldiers to the square must command them when and where to run. Moreover, as we see from the letter of the Aurora sailors, in 1917 there was no idea about the connection between the assault and the shot.

There is a version that the Aurora fired live fire, but not at the palace, but at Palace Square or the garden in front of the Winter Palace, where the cadets defending it were located. And missed a little. This version explains why they fired from a cruiser, and not from a fortress: the building of the palace covers Palace Square from fortress guns. In addition, as the newspapers wrote, the shelling from the cruiser began long before the assault. What fits into this scheme. However, if you shoot at people, then you need to shoot high-explosive shells with a large amount of explosive. But the hit of such a projectile on the wall of the Winter Palace would have caused damage, the existence of which the Bolsheviks would have been unable to deny. Perhaps the junkers only wanted to scare and therefore fired shells without fuses. You can also scare blanks, but they have a different sound of a shot, and a trained ear will immediately distinguish one from the other.

However, there is another universal version that cannot be neglected: then the revolutionary sailors had no shortage of alcohol and drugs. Therefore, they could shoot for any reason. .

The myth of the "volley of Aurora" was born literally the day after the storming of the Winter Palace, the signal for which was a shot from the legendary cruiser. Such information began to appear in the local press. Subsequently, already in the Stalin years, the version that the Aurora fired at Zimny ​​with real shells was actively replicated: this was written about it in the “Short Course on the History of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks”, the play “Aurora Volley” was staged at the Moscow Art Theater, according to which a film of the same name was released in the 1960s; in 1937, Mikhail Romm made the film "Lenin in October", where the audience's attention is also focused on this episode. The myth of the “volley” did not bypass literature either: Alexei Tolstoy in his “Walking Through the Torments” writes about the roof of the Winter Palace pierced by a shell.

Examples of using

It was all that was left of the once noisy and drunken hustle and bustle of the capital. The idle crowds left the squares and streets. The Winter Palace was empty, pierced through the roof by a shell from the Aurora. (Alexey Tolstoy. "Walking through the torments." Book 2)

On October 21, commissars of the Military Revolutionary Committee were sent by the Bolsheviks to all revolutionary units of the troops. All the days before the uprising in military units, in factories and plants, vigorous combat training was going on. Certain tasks were also received by combat ships - the cruiser "Aurora" and "Dawn of Freedom"<…>The revolutionary units of the troops, prepared for the uprising by the work of the Bolsheviks, faithfully carried out military orders and fought side by side with the Red Guard. The navy did not lag behind the army. Kronstadt was a stronghold of the Bolshevik Party, where the authority of the Provisional Government had long since ceased to be recognized. Cruiser "Aurora" on October 25, with the thunder of his cannons aimed at the Winter Palace, he announced the beginning of a new era - the era of the Great Socialist Revolution. (A short course in the history of the CPSU (b))

Reality

The first and main debunkers of the myth were the sailors themselves from the Aurora cruiser. The day after the events described in the Pravda newspaper, an article appeared in which the sailors tried to prove that there had been no shelling of the Winter Palace on their part: if the cruiser had fired “for real”, not only the palace, but also surrounding areas, they argued. The text of the rebuttal was:

“To all honest citizens of the city of Petrograd from the crew of the cruiser Avrora, which expresses its sharp protest against the accusations thrown, especially the accusations that have not been verified, but throw a stain of shame on the cruiser crew. We declare that we have come not to destroy the Winter Palace, not to kill civilians, but to protect and, if necessary, die for freedom and revolution from counter-revolutionaries.
The press writes that the Aurora opened fire on the Winter Palace, but do the gentlemen reporters know that the cannon fire we opened would not have left stone unturned not only from the Winter Palace, but also from the streets adjacent to it? But does it really exist?

We appeal to you, workers and soldiers of the city of Petrograd! Do not believe provocative rumors. Do not believe them that we are traitors and rioters, and check the rumors yourself. As for the shots from the cruiser, only one blank shot was fired from a 6-inch gun, indicating a signal for all ships stationed on the Neva, and calling them to vigilance and readiness. Please reprint all editions.
Chairman of the ship's committee
A. Belyshev
Tov. Chairman P. Andreev
Secretary /signature/”. ("Pravda", No. 170, October 27, 1917)

For many years, while official propaganda benefited from the myth of the power of revolutionary weapons, in which a single blank shot grew into a whole volley of military guns, no one remembered this note. Already during the Khrushchev "thaw" this text appeared in the journal "New World", in the article by V. Cardin "Legends and Facts" (1966, No. 2, p. 237). However, the Pravda newspaper responded not at all friendly to the quotation of itself 50 years ago, publishing in March 1967 a message on behalf of the Secretariat of the Writers' Union of the SSR, warning Soviet people against reading articles "imbued with false tendencies to unjustified revision and belittling of revolutionary and heroic traditions of the Soviet people. The article did not leave indifferent the top leadership of the country. In one of his speeches to the Politburo, L.I. Brezhnev was indignant: “After all, some of our writers (and they are published) agree that there was supposedly no Aurora salvo, that it was supposedly a blank shot, etc., that there were no 28 Panfilov’s, that there were fewer of them, this fact was almost invented that there was no Klochko and there was no his call that "Moscow is behind us and we have nowhere to retreat ...".

Many years later, already in perestroika, the article “permeated with a false trend” was reprinted in the Ogonyok magazine.

The military also refutes the myth about the shelling of Zimny ​​from a cruiser: the ship, which really won military glory by participating in the Russo-Japanese and World War I, was undergoing major repairs since 1916, which means that all the ammunition from it by the time of the October events should have been there for a long time removed - in accordance with the instructions in force.

Sources and literature

Cardin W. Legends and facts. // New World, 1966. No. 2. S. 237.

V. N. Smolin

Letters from the gunner-igniter of the Petrograd separate fortress artillery company.

"We're getting ready to fight. The fortress can only fire from machine guns and rifles: the guns, menacingly standing on the parapets, were not adapted for firing and were placed solely for greater effect (only one gun fired, loaded from the muzzle and announcing the time). It was necessary to think about how to get guns and install them ... ”These words belong to G. I. Blagonravov, the commissar of the Peter and Paul Fortress in the October days of 1917. If you read his memoirs further, you can find out that the soldiers of the fortress company were considered unreliable by the commissar of the Military Revolutionary Committee, but still he managed to find several three-inch guns in the Kronverksky arsenal and roll them out to the "camps" - the space between the Alekseevsky ravelin and the banks of the Kronverksky channel and the Neva River , - to shoot at the Winter direct fire.

The artillery soldiers refused to fire these guns, citing their malfunction. Then artillery sailors were called from the Naval training ground on Okhta, who then fired shots at the Winter Palace. “Immediately upon my return,” Blagonravov writes further, “I informed the sailors about what was required of them. At the same time, he ordered to open concentrated fire along the embankment and at the palace. Soon the crackle of shots showed me that the order had been carried out with precision. With the guns, too, everything was ready.
The memoirs of the fortress commissioner became the main source for describing this fact. Comparing them with other sources recreates the picture of the shelling of Zimny: the guns of the fortress are out of order, the gunners refuse to fire from the three-inch cannons rolled out onto the camp meadow, artillery sailors are called in, they fire 30 - 35 shots, only one of the shells hits the target - into the room on third floor of the Winter Palace. Such a scheme can be found in many books up to the present day. A photograph taken in this room has also survived to this day, which recorded the destruction caused by the projectile.
And it was this photograph that was the first drop that began to “grind the stone”. Dozens of people have seen it in archives and books. But it never occurred to anyone to look for this room, so to speak, to examine the "accident scene." However, this is not entirely true. In any case, one person acted as the common sense and instinct of the researcher suggested to him. This person is Pavel Filippovich Gubchevsky, a senior researcher at the State Hermitage. Back in 1947, while on behalf of the administration, preparing for the thirtieth anniversary of the October Revolution, he began to collect documents and photographs about the Winter Palace on October 24-25, 1917. As a true museum worker, as a man in love with his Hermitage, whose head of security he was during the harsh time of the blockade, P. F. Gubchevsky began to travel around the Winter Palace with these photographs, “tying” them to the current topography of the museum.
He also reached the room into which a shell from the Peter and Paul Fortress hit. He began to look for a hole in the wall, captured in the photograph. When he found this place and looked around, he saw with amazement in a small side window, from where only a shell could fly in, the Naryshkinsky bastion of the Peter and Paul Fortress! But it was known that they were shooting from the splash of the Neva, from the left flank of the fortress. So wrote G. I. Blagonravov, so all the specialized literature spoke. And only the hole, only the trajectory of the projectile spoke about something else. This shot was taken from the Naryshkinsky bastion, located in the center of the fortress. The room where the shell hit is corner and has two windows. One wide, overlooking the Neva. And the second narrow one, which offers a view of the Naryshkinsky bastion and the Troitsky (now Kirovsky) bridge. If a projectile had been fired from a splash cannon, it would have shattered a corner of a building or a large front window and crashed into the opposite wall. And then the right side wall and the side window were broken. But P. F. Gubchevsky was neither a specialist in ballistics nor a historian of the October Revolution. All he had on his side was a frozen photograph, a wall, a window, an imaginary line of trajectory. On the other side are the authorities of the participants in the revolution and professional historians.
Then, in 1947, all this remained his personal conjecture, a conclusion prompted by intuition. P. F. Gubchevsky did not tell about his doubt in the press, but kept it in his memory. Then other concerns distracted him from this topic, and only in recent years, under the most unexpected circumstances, did he return to firing from the Naryshkinsky bastion.
In the same year, 1947, many hundreds of kilometers from Leningrad, in the Vologda region, in the city of Veliky Ustyug, an elderly man retired due to disability. His name was Vasily Nikolaevich Smolin.
There was one remarkable detail in his biography. Since 1915, he was a soldier-artilleryman of the same Petrograd separate fortress artillery company, which was located in the Peter and Paul Fortress. And he, Smolin, was in the fortress on October 25, 1917. He kept his soldier's book and some documents, kept in his strong peasant memory many, many details of that historical night when he himself stood at the cannon on the Naryshkinsky bastion and fired at the Winter Palace. But for the time being, few people were interested in this, and he himself rarely talked about it in those years. But then the neighbors found out, then they began to invite me to speak with memoirs as a participant in the events. V. N. Smolin wrote down “setting data”, as he himself calls them, in a school notebook, and began to conduct conversations in the museum of local lore, in schools. Much in this notebook came from the popular literature on the October uprising, but there were own memories, especially valuable for listeners.
In March 1964, Smolin arrived in Leningrad. In the Artillery Museum, in an exhibition called "Russian artillery of the period of capitalism", he suddenly saw his six-inch (or 24-pounder) copper gun No. 5181 of the 1867 model. Starting from 1908 (when 11 of these six-inch guns replaced older guns on the Naryshkinsky bastion), a midday shot was fired from it every day. From the same gun, Smolin himself and his comrades fired a blank shot after 9 pm on October 25, which served as a signal for the six-inch Auror.
In the spring of 1964, an elderly man with a beard came to the Hermitage to P. F. Gubchevsky and introduced himself as a public researcher at the Museum of the History of Leningrad, Alexander Grigoryevich Petrov. In the past, a military artilleryman, now a pensioner and a passionate lover of the history of his city. He came with anxiety. I was afraid that during the repair the holes from shrapnel bullets on the grating of the ramp of the Oktyabrsky entrance of the Hermitage would not be repaired. In his opinion, these potholes were made during the artillery shelling of the Winter Palace on the evening of October 25, 1917. A conversation ensued. Their meetings began to repeat. And the conversation has moved more widely. How many shots were fired at the palace, how many hits... P. F. Gubchevsky again remembered his old doubts, and he told A. G. Petrov about the room on the third floor. Together they went up there, measured the walls, studied the photographs.
Conversations with P. F. Gubchevsky gave a new direction to the search for A. G. Petrov. And then he accidentally learned from the museum staff that some old man came to the Peter and Paul Fortress, claiming that he had fired at the Winter Palace from the Naryshkinsky bastion. But VN Smolin had already left. And then, on March 17, 1964, the first letter of A. G. Petrov flew after him, which marked the beginning of their correspondence. Soon an answer came from Veliky Ustyug.

Dear Alexander Grigorievich,
Hello dear!
This letter is written to you by that old man from Veliky Ustyug, to whom you sent a huge registered letter No. 667 on March 17, 1964 with assignments about the Peter and Paul Fortress.
I am writing to you with my own hand. Very happy to answer a friend.
In Leningrad, I stayed with my brother for 7 days - March 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. I spent all these days walking around places of interest, such as: Smolny, in the apartment-museum of S. M. Kirov, on the cruiser "Aurora", where they gave me good documents as a veteran of the Great October battles ... I saw my historical copper cannon in the museum from which they fired on November 7 (message). Weight 83 pounds 8 pounds (without a lock), sample 1867. They also gave me a good memo with a metal AIM badge, which they themselves wear on their chests.
I spent most of the time in the fortress itself near the museum administration, where I have to fill out and deliver a personal card (questionnaire) with a photograph of a soldier of 1917.
On March 10, he met with the guys from the Signal Gun Zinoviev, Strikov, Kudryavtsev, with whom, at their invitation, they jointly fired a traditional shot at the fortress at 12 noon. As an old veteran, a guest from Veliky Ustyug, they entered me in the shooting log with the issuance of a good memorandum (letter) to me. Thank you very much for this. In the fortress, I met the guides, they copied from my notebook memories of the great revolutionary events of 1917 (the storming of the Winter Palace) ...
Your questions.
1) Were there fireworks after the war started in 1914? Answer. Salutes were produced before the February Revolution of 1917.
2) What type were the three-inch cannons that stood in the yard? 1891, as I remember.
3) Why do you call copper guns six inches and not 24 pounds?
Therefore, they called it six-inch, since its caliber is 6 inches. I do not deny that we also knew that she was 24 pounds (this is in diameter). But they called it six-inch more - the old fashioned way.
4) What projectile was placed in the barrel of a copper cannon to fire at the Winter Palace? Answer. Grenade.
5) Was the red flag raised on the flagpole on February 27, 1917. Answer. Was not.
6) Did the cannon shoot at noon in the summer of 1917? Answer. Yes, she shot.
7) How the salute was made when those who died in February 1917 were buried on the Field of Mars
Answer. The salute was fired at the funeral of the victims of the February Revolution of 1917. Soldiers of the Pavlovsky regiment fired from rifles. This past phenomenon is claimed by former artillerymen Smolin V.N. and Selin V. Iv. Salute from the Peter and Paul Fortress, like you, Smolin. N., I remember, was not performed at the funeral of the victims of the February Revolution. Until the February Revolution of 1917, all the salutes we made were recorded by our command in the soldier's books, according to which the soldiers were given a monthly salary of 75 kopecks. per month and at the same time for the salute, if there was one, 17 kopecks. In total, Smolin received 92 kopecks in a month. So it was recorded by the command until 17, and after the February Revolution, in the soldier's paybooks, like mine, there are no marks or records of salutes. In addition to the salary received - 75 kopecks. per month. Which testifies that after the February Revolution until the October Revolution, no shooting was carried out from the Peter and Paul Fortress, except for the signal gun.
The soldier's book is currently in storage at the local museum of Veliky Ustyug, along with my submitted documents.
8) Did the signal gun fire at noon on July 5, 1917, when there were sailors from Kronstadt in the fortress? Answer. Shot.
9) What gun was fired on October 25, 1917 as a signal to the Aurora? Answer. From the messenger shot was given. Idle.
This is where I finish writing. I send you greetings and wish you good health.

Your friend. Smolin.

Monday, May 11
Alexander Grigorievich,
Hello dear!
I received your letter dated April 24, I am very grateful for it... Alexander Grigoryevich, thank you very much for the photo. It's very, very interesting for me. It is interesting that after 47 years, as I served in the fortress, and you somehow managed to find me in the archives in the orders, that I, Smolin V.N., received 2 rubles from the house. of money. This is absolutely correct: for the entire service of 3 years 2 months I received only 2 rubles from home, since my father and mother lived poorly. It is also very interesting: order No. 54 of February 23, 1915 - on taking the oath.
You're asking.
1. Are these 24-pound copper guns in the photo?
I answer yes. Copper 24 lbs. One of them is a messenger, which stands first on the right side, how to climb the stairs to the fortress. And then this weapon before the October (revolution) was pumped into the middle to 3rd place.
2. What material are the puff cases?
Answer. The muzzle covers were made of thick, harsh tarpaulin.
About badges.(1)
Yes, they were, only a few. I also had a badge, which I later lost. What is the benefit in it?
About the signal gun team in the days when we served.
1. The permanent head of the old soldiers, scorer comrade. Golubev, who was in charge of this case. His duty is to charge the gunpowder daily until 12 noon, which he brought in the morning from the powder magazine.
2. After each midday shot, the vesting gun was cleaned, for which two escorts were appointed daily, according to order or for punishment, to clean the guns.
I am an old man, I want to give the right answers to all the questions you ask.
I also took part in the funeral of the victims of the February Revolution in the first days of March 1917 on the Field of Mars, where oblong graves-ditches with sheer walls were dug, where 137 brown coffins were placed across the ditches. There was a mourning meeting, the Bolsheviks made heated speeches, when the mass graves were buried, black mourning banners with an inclination were hoisted on the graves. But about the fireworks in the fortress at that time, which was done without me, I can’t remember about this until the discussion of this issue with my comrades, former artillerymen.
Your question. Was there a midday shot on July 5, 1917? I am writing that at this time from June 20 to July 11 for 21 days I was on vacation in the city of Ustyug.
On the Civil War of 1918 Since September 5, I served on the Northern Arkhangelsk Front. Wreed Head of the horse stock. Many horses died from starvation, and the desertion was terrible.
Very interesting
Two soldiers served with us in the Petrograd fortress.
1. Savin Fedor, Novgorod region.
2. Zamyatin Sevastyan Mikhailovich, Arkhangelsk region.
They were very badly served. They carried punishment after punishment from their commanders: either to clean the latrine out of turn, or to clean the messenger gun out of turn, there was simply no rest for these soldiers.
When the February Revolution broke out, one of them, Zamyatin Sevastyan Mikhailovich, sensing freedom like a lion, reared up in front of his command. Instead of cleaning out the messenger cannon for him, he grabbed a heavy cleaver-axe on the fortress, which was used to upholster the ice on the stairs, and with this cleaver he chopped with all his heroic swing along the edge of the muzzle of the upper part of the messenger gun of the 1867 model. This tool is easy to find with an ulcer on the cut doula - it is in the museum b. Kronverksky Arsenal on the lower floor. Gun-copper, with a shiny barrel, especially the breech.
Participant of the revolution Smolin VN from the city of Veliky Ustyug.

July 25, 1964
Dear Alexander Grigorievich, hello, dear!
You write that we are going to write an article about the gun that signaled the Aurora. And who was at the gun in the evening of 25/X 1917? Writing. Here are the servants of this gun, as far as I remember, but not all of them.
1. Skolotnev Afanasy Yakovlevich, scorer from the reserve soldiers of the Kadnikovsky district of the Vologda province
2. Villanen (gunner), a Finn who loaded the gun,
Smolin Vasily Nikolaevich, gunner - gun igniter.
To your question, who brought the order to shoot and who gave the command “Fire!”, this has not been preserved in my memory from time immemorial.
3. How many salute guns were there?
For the salute, 5 guns were prepared, but they fired from 4 for lack of servants.

Alexander Grigoryevich!

To your questions, what shells and where did we get them for firing on the evening of October 25, 1917 from the fortress cannons at Zimny ​​from the fortress?
Answer. Shells, grenades were received by us from the Powder Cellar warehouse, which was located in the fortress,
To a question. How many guns fired?
Answer. 4 guns fired. 6-inch guns. Including the news.
Question. How many shots were fired?
Answer. Shots were fired 5 blanks and 2 live shells.
There was great confusion on my part about the messenger gun. In my past memoirs, it was written that on 25/X, 1917, we fired from the fortress guns from the Peter and Paul Fortress at Zimny. That's right, our common shooting is one whole. You understood: on October 25, the signal gun not only fired a blank shot, as a signal to the Aurora, but also fired live shells. This is not true.
After a long puzzle, I remembered. That the news gun on the evening of October 25, 1917, from which we fired one blank shot. And no more shots were fired from it. Especially with shells - this is a mistake. This is also confirmed by the gun itself, its mint, inflicted at the height of the February Revolution by Comrade Zamyatin, [on] the cut of the cannon's muzzle. The flattening of the mint, the lower part of which hung below the internal rifling of the trunk. If in the October days of October 25 a projectile was fired from it, then the projectile that flew out of the muzzle would definitely cut off [the] hanging canopy of the mint.
After reading this letter, I ask you to go to the art museum and look at the mint. Is it true?(2)
The remaining three guns fired 2 shots each, that is, four blanks and 2 live shells. One shell was fired at Zimny, apparently, it turned the corner of the building. And the 2nd shell, which was fired from the 4th gun by mistake of the igniter, which, not allowing the gunner to really aim at Zimny, hurried up, pulled the cord earlier, and the shell flew off to Sennaya Square, where 4 people were killed, that is, the worker's family. What the next day, 26/X, was announced by a man who came to the fortress, but it all turned out that way. After all, there is no revolution without victims. Complaining is useless - who was killed ... (3).

November 18, 1964
Alexander Grigorievich,
Hello dear!
I have received your letter of October 28 and your greeting card of November 3. Thank you very much for your congratulations. I read your letter several times, from which I see all your efforts and efforts to collect various references and materials. Then you write that your help is needed. And I will answer your questions.
9) Question. Did you see how the arrested ministers of the Provisional Government were brought to the fortress?
Answer. When the escorts led the ministers to the fortress, it was at 3 am on October 26th. We met this procession at the Petrovsky Gates, from which a crowd of arrested people and escorts emerged, and interested people ran along the sides of this crowd: workers and other outsiders. These strangers ran trotting on the sides, overtaking one another, ran far ahead, and, turning around to face this procession, everyone tried to reliably see these ministers in the face, moving backwards, but it was very difficult to see them, they were in a large environment of escorts, and the light of the street lamps that night was very poor, dim, not all the lamps were on. The ministers were brought in and taken to the cells of the Trubetskoy bastion. After that, we, the artillerymen, went to our company through the kitchen entrance, which was located next to the Trubetskoy bastion. Our barracks turned out to have entrance doors and floors, the windows on the Neva side were open, glass was broken in them, it was cold in the barracks, and we soldiers, wet since yesterday, never went to bed.
To the question, did you know where the former ministers were sitting? Of course, we knew, and we, soldiers, were let in after the October Revolution. And from the February Revolution until the October Revolution under the Provisional Government, when the tsarist ministers were in office, they did not let us in there, although our company was close to the cells of the Trubetskoy bastion. It was divided by only one wall, and the street passage between the fortress and the Mint (courtyard) was blocked by a wooden plank fence along the surface with barbed wire, on which we, the soldiers, after washing in the bath, hung linen to dry to dry, but this linen was all smoked with soot flying from the pipes of the Mint Factory.
Once, under the Provisional Government, shortly after the February Revolution, during a visit by relatives of those arrested, I managed to get into the first cells where the tsarist ministers were sitting, on whose beds newspapers were spread out instead of a bed, and later these tenants, under the auspices of their good, kind host began to grow rapidly economically. Before the October Revolution, in the evenings, relatives began to deliver down jackets, mattresses, pillows and blankets to those arrested during their visit, and this was all done before our eyes. And we are direct witnesses to this case - soldiers of a separate company, I, Smolin, for my part, can give at least 100 signatures in confirmation.
To the question about the gun in the museum, about the scratches on the breech.
I answer. These scratches are the result of careless cleaning. The vesting gun was cleaned daily after each shot, different soldiers cleaned it for punishment, no one watched how and with what the guilty ones cleaned the guns, if only the barrel, the surface of the gun shone. Some daredevils cleaned wood on a rag and bricks. There were no good banniks for cleaning the internal channels of the gun, but there were only bases, the metal bristles of hair were worn off from them, often the bannik was wrapped with rags, wrapped around, strengthened with wire, and this all spoke of damage to the gun.
To the question about 11 guns on the bastion.
I answer. All these 11 guns stood on the bastion: arranged in order. There were 5 guns on the right side of the tower, and 6 guns on the left side.
I didn’t have time to rewrite this sketch for a finishing one, which will be incomprehensible to you, write a second time. I will try to answer.
With sincere respect Smolin.

January 4, 1965
Lot
I am very sorry that I was late in answering your letter of November 24, 1964 ...
To the question, was the palace illuminated by searchlights?
Answer. Illuminated at times, and that is bad. On the fortress at that time there was one unimportant searchlight on the Nevsky Curtain, which, diving, threw its rays in a sheaf for a very short time in the direction of the Winter, as if looking for something there.
To the question, were the cannons directed at a certain place or only at the palace?
Answer. The order of the government(4) was given not to destroy the costly building, but to shoot at certain places only.
Question. Why was there a lantern with red glasses in the fortress?
Answer. According to the plan developed by the Field Headquarters of the Military Revolutionary Committee, the flash of a lantern with red glasses on the flagpole of the fortress should serve as a signal for the assault. But we did not find such a lantern with red glasses in the fortress. They ran for a long time looking for a lantern. And then they already guessed to arrange their own lantern. They used a simple company household small lantern, tied it with a red scarf, and pulled it up to the flagpole (on the mast) so that it was visible, but the lantern emitted a dim light, but still served as a sign to start signal firing from the fortress and the Aurora cruiser. The lantern was equipped and pulled up on the flagpole by the captain of a separate company of artillery Krylov, a draft scorer in 1911 ...
Your friend Smolin.

(February) 1965
Dear Alexander Grigorievich!
You asked me a few questions back that confuse me. You write, you ask me where 4 horse artillery guns came from. And why were they in the fortress? I won't tell you anything about this. I know that these 4 cannons, which stood along the Catherine Curtain, that is, under the windows of our barracks, stood with us in the summer of 1916 for no more than 3-4 months, for training soldiers. And then they were gone, they say that these guns were sent to the front near Dvinsk [to] an air-piercing battery.
...2. Six pieces of three-inch guns that stood on the parade ground of the Naryshkin bastion, on October 25, 1917 at 11 o’clock in the afternoon, were rolled out by us onto the splash of the river. Not you. And in addition to these, we rolled out several cannons from the Kronverk arsenal, which stood there in the yard between the sheds. These cannons from the Arsenal were rolled along the Kronverksky bridge through the Ivanovsky and Petrovsky gates, rounding at the cathedral, again rolled out into the Nikolsky gates on the Kronverksky coast and through the Camp meadow to the splash. This is how it appears at present. Like a sleepy dream. After all, 48 years have passed since then. Where do you remember everything (5).
In March 1964, when I visited the Peter and Paul Fortress, the inside of the fortress seemed unrecognizable. Fences that were previously * all demolished, as well as small buildings. Anywhere and everywhere you can freely go. I went into my barracks, into that casemate, the 1st platoon, where we served, were placed, where we climbed in 1917 through the window. I really wanted to see everything in the company, but the working carpenters asked me to get out of there, and I left offended - why are they sorry? I stayed in Leningrad for seven days at that time with my brother Grisha, who lives in Petrodvorets. Out of 7 days, I got lost in the Peter and Paul Fortress for 5 days - I wandered, I looked like a wolf.
Writing. After all, there is only one bridge across the Kronverk Strait. Walking from Trinity Square along the bridge to the fortress, you enter the Ivanovsky Gates of Ioanovsky Ravelin, and then enter the fortress - the second gate. This will be the Petrovsky Gate, isn't it? We called the Kronverk gates those gates that were at the fence of the Arsenal. There is a moat and a bridge behind it. We stood at these gates, on duty for 2 shifts a day for 12 hours. On February 27 - 1917, at the height of the February Revolution, revolutionary workers climbed through these gates for weapons ...
Your friend Smolin.

(early May) 1965
Dear Alexander Grigorievich!
You write that you are in great need of my answers about guns and shells, which you need for further work that is far from being completed. What are we going to do, my friend?
To the question, what happened to the 3 cannons that were rolled out on October 25, 1917 on the splash of the Neva River, and what was done with unsuitable 87 mm trained shells? This is where I find it difficult to answer you. Shortly after the October Revolution, the boxes with shells were removed, where they were taken away, removed, I don’t know. The guns on the splash were left standing there for a long time. At the end of November 1917, as I wrote to you earlier, we artillerymen were evicted from the fortress outside the city to the Srednyaya Rogatka station, which is located 12 versts from Leningrad along the Varshavskaya railway line. etc. And from there they were sent to the front. And therefore, I cannot say what happened to these guns that were on the splash, where were they put later?
I send you greetings. Write. Smolin.

Dymkovo. October 24, 1965
Dear Alexander Grigorievich, hello!
Write what you have now new with preparations for the 48th anniversary of the Great October Revolution. What materials do you need the most?
In your last letter, you asked me to answer a few questions.
1. Where was the headquarters of the Military Revolutionary Committee?
I answer. at the Smolny Institute.
2nd question. What was the name of Warrant Officer Karpov?
I answer. Karpov's name was Rostislav Rostislavovich.
3rd question. Was there a passage from your barracks to the shore (through the window)?
I answer. There were no passages from our barracks to the shore. And soldiers climbed through the window after the February Revolution, when from the windows on the side of the Neva River the soldiers themselves were hacked from the spans of the window bars, and these bars were outside attached to the walls against the windows, which served as stairs from the barracks to go down to the garden. I already wrote about this earlier in my materials. The way to the shore was through the Nevsky Gates.
4. Question. Have you seen the sailor from the "Amur", he was in contact with the cruiser "Aurora"?
Answer. We did not know such a connected sailor from the Amur.
To the question: the English correspondent Philip Bryce saw a red flag on the flagpole of the fortress in the days of October.
I answer. If there had been a red flag on the flagpole before the start of the assault, then why did we need to look for a rope to pull a red lantern onto the flagpole. We would then lower the flag to the bottom, and tie the lantern, and pull the lantern together with the flag on one rope. And then we didn’t have any rope on the mast at that moment, which is why the beginning of the assault on the palace was delayed for a long time. Only then could the flag be on the flagpole when the shooting ended, that is, they took the Winter. The last one is the most correct. Yes, at the end of the assault, the red flag hoisted from the mast. It was well remembered. Then Philip Bryce is right...

Dear Alexander Grigorievich!
... Here you write that the training guns in a separate artillery company were without sights and panoramas. This is not true, how can it be without sights and panoramas? There were sights, but they were separated from the guns after each firing, and before firing they were again installed on the front breech of the gun.
All these three-inch guns were castle side, like the fortress six-inch ones. The guns from the Kronverk arsenal were in the same condition.
The guns that stood at the Ekaterininsky curtain of the 1900 model, which were sent to the front in the summer of 1916 in air-piercing batteries near Dvinsk. Both those and others did not have armor shields. Yes, there was indeed no oil in the compressors. There was no oil not only in the compressors of the guns, but it was also missing from the battery of the fortress. It is not surprising that the fortress six-inch and three-inch guns turned out to be out of order and rusty by the day of the assault on October 25, since these guns were not cleaned due to lack of oil on the battery.
About the Kronverk bridge.
Your drawing scheme dated May 20, 1966 is given correctly in your letter.
This bridge was temporary on wooden piles (pillars), [with] a wooden transverse flooring. In the strait, near the bridge, there were wooden barges loaded with aspen logs, melted down from nowhere. This melted firewood from the barges was unloaded by workers and soldiers and laid on the shore against the walls of the fortress, and from there they were transported by the military units located in the fortress for their own needs for kitchen and barrack heating. A little higher than this bridge, on the same left bank, two wooden plank sheds were built, in which evacuated and captured various property brought from the fronts, somehow worn uniforms, horse equipment, etc. were tightly packed. was knocked down in sheds, and large objects, such as church bells, factory machines, huge boilers, cannons, on which there were inscriptions in white chalk: “Przemysl”, “Warsaw”, etc. Apparently, this property was evacuated from there, which was littered with was the entire coast almost to the military bath. All this was littered with various junk: irons, copper shoe studs, which were scattered in the boilers, as can be seen from large state military shoe shops, and all this goodness was not one year in the open air, in the rain. There were also searchlights, lying in these heaps. You can't read everything. To protect this property, a separate company artillery was allocated a guard post, where 2 people were assigned for a day. They stood for 4 hours, and a day came out 12 hours. I, Smolin, also often had to freeze my snot in this post.
I also forgot to write that near this Kronverksky bridge there was a high pillar in the water, on which a wide board was nailed and a warning was written on it:
Don't drop anchors!
Electrical cable.

Well, whatever you need, write.
Smolin.

Dear Anna Ivanovna and Alexander Grigorievich!
I have received your dear letter dated August 6 this year, thank you very much. Sorry for the delay in answering. We have some eternal things to do, now harvesting, then another, third ...
I keep all your various photographs sent and memoirs brought back in March 1964. Now, in addition to the Great Ustyug Museum, in which a lot of mine is exhibited there, I have a whole museum at home in my large front room. Even I got a signal light with red glasses, which is pulled up to the ceiling so that everyone can see it. And I tell the people who have gathered in my room, pointing to the lantern with my hand. Here, a signal lamp lit up on the fortress, and immediately two blank cannon shots thundered: the 1st from the fortress, and the 2nd from the cruiser Aurora (6). From the bright flashes of gun shots in the darkness of the night, the Neva River and its embankments lit up for a moment, etc.
Yes, you and I, Alexander Grigorievich, have now understood well about all the bridges leading from the fortress to the Kronverk arsenal.
This bridge disappeared, we will assume, in 1918-1919, during the civil war, for firewood. Now there are no traces left of the bridge, only memories. On this bridge that disappeared on the day of October 25, 1917 at 10 am, the artillerymen of the Peter and Paul Fortress Vasily Nikolayevich Smolin, Grigory Novoselov, Afanasy Yakovlevich Skolotnev, Andrey Villanen and others (forgotten names), all these named soldiers of a separate company 1- The first platoon at 10 o'clock in the morning rolled light three-inch cannons from the yard and from the sheds of the Kronverksky arsenal, across the camp meadow and installed these guns on the banks of the Neva on the splash near the Trubetskoy bastion with muzzles in the direction of the Winter Palace. To your question to me: “Did you personally hear the Aurora shot?
My answer. Yes, very well I heard the shot of the Aurora.
Write. Your friend Smolin.

AFTERWORD

The letters of V. N. Smolin, published with abbreviations, are interesting primarily because they cover the participation of soldiers of the Petrograd separate fortress artillery company in the October armed uprising. The stories about the "neutrality" of the company have some basis. She really declared her non-interference in the events of the July days. On July 5, when the fortress was occupied by Kronstadt sailors, the noon shot was not fired, so as not to give grounds for suspicion of a provocation. "Neutralist" sentiments were also strong in the Oktyabrsk days. But the fact remains: it was the artillerymen of the company who rolled out the famous three-inch guns onto the splash of the Neva. Finally, it was they who fired several live shots. The only hit inside the palace from the side of the Neva is also the result of their work.
V. N. Smolin also speaks of the artillerymen's refusal to fire from three-inch guns. But he gives this fact another, purely psychological explanation. It seemed strange to the soldiers why they were forced to roll these cannons over the fortress walls, when “their own” cannons, quite suitable for combat, were standing on the bastion?
V. N. Smolin denies the fact of firing from three-inch guns that were in the "camps". Perhaps they were firing at the same time as the six-inch guns of the Naryshkinsky bastion, and therefore the roar of shots merged. Maybe it's just a memory lapse. Artillery sailors really came to the Peter and Paul Fortress and fired from three-inch guns. This is mentioned in many memoirs. Employees of the Artillery Museum in Leningrad are now busy establishing the names and surnames of these gunners.
There are other gaps in the memories of the former gunner. So it remains unclear when they received the order to prepare six-inch guns for battle, who exactly gave them this order?
In addition to a number of actual details of the shelling of the Winter Palace, Smolin's letters are also interesting from the point of view of depicting the revolutionary life of the Petrograd garrison, and even the life of the old royal barracks. In this sense, the story of the soldier Zamyatin is remarkable. In Smolin's story there is a lot of value for a sociologist as well. The psychology of a soldier - yesterday's peasant is clearly manifested in many letters. Look with what masterly regret V. N. Smolin describes the disorderly warehouse of things outside the walls of the Peter and Paul Fortress, at which he stands at his post. How many thoughts raced through his mind as he considered all this possessions so carelessly kept! And how interesting and figurative in its own way the folk language of letters, among which there are real finds, wonderful descriptions!

1. We are talking about signs issued in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Petrograd separate fortress artillery company in 1911.
2. Dent and overhang are exactly as described.
3. In the newspapers of that time there is a mention of the fall of an unexploded shell on Demidov per. next to Sennaya Square. There are no reports of casualties.
4. This refers to the Military Revolutionary Committee.
5. Subsequently, V. N. Smolin remembered that the route for rolling out the guns from the Kronverk arsenal was different. See last letter
6. A. G. Petrov found out that the blank charge of the six-inch gun of the Naryshkinsky bastion consisted of 8 pounds of smokeless powder, and the blank charge of the six-inch gun of the Kane system of the cruiser Aurora consisted of 17 pounds. Thus, the Aurora shot was more powerful and was heard further.

V. N. Smolin How they shot at the Winter Palace on October 25, 1917. Letters from the gunner-igniter of the Petrograd separate fortress artillery company. Publication by V. I. Michkov.// PROMETHEUS. Historical and biographical almanac series<<Жизнь замечательных людей>>. T. 4. Editor-compiler N. Pirumova. M .: Young Guard, 1967. pp. 164-173

Historical shot or volley?

On the embankment of the Red Fleet, near house number 44, a granite stele was installed with the inscription: “October 25 (November 7), 1917. Opposite this place, the cruiser Aurora, with the thunder of its cannons aimed at the Winter Palace, announced on October 25 the beginning of a new era - the era of the Great Socialist Revolution.
Indeed, in 1917 the cruiser's crew took part in the October events. According to the order of the Bolshevik Military Revolutionary Committee, the cruiser stood at the Nikolaevsky Bridge (Lieutenant Schmidt Bridge) to shell the Winter Palace, where the Provisional Government was located. A blank charge was fired from the bow gun of the Aurora (in Soviet literature, the shot was called a "volley", "thunder of cannons", etc.), which was considered the signal to start the assault on the Winter Palace.
Sailor N. A. Khovrin, a member of the Central Committee of the Baltic Fleet, said that the Aurors deliberately loaded the cannon with a blank charge. They could not help but go on a raid and follow the order of the Military Revolutionary Committee, because they were afraid of the reprisals of the Bolshevik sailors from Kronstadt and Helsingfors. In case of failure of the coup, the Aurors could justify themselves. This version has been around for a long time. Subsequently, the story was "combed", linking the blank shot of the cruiser with the signal given from the Peter and Paul Fortress, and the beginning of the assault on the Winter. On the days of the celebration of the 10th anniversary of the October Revolution, a copper plaque appeared on the tank gun with the inscription: “6-inch tank gun, from which a historic shot was fired on October 25, 1917 at the time of the capture of the Winter Palace. Cruiser Aurora, 1927.
This stereotype has firmly entered our consciousness: no one doubted that the shot from the Aurora tank gun heralded the “beginning of a new era”, and the ship is deservedly considered “legendary”.
In the encyclopedia “The Great October Socialist Revolution” (1987) we read: “On the morning of October 25 (November 7), the Aurora radio station transmitted the appeal of the Military Revolutionary Committee written by V. I. Lenin ““ To the citizens of Russia! ” On the same day at 21 hour 40 minutes, according to a conventional sign from the Peter and Paul Fortress, the bow gun of the Aurora with a blank shot gave the signal to storm the Winter Palace, in which the sailors of the cruiser participated.
A bit of history. The cruiser inherited its name from a frigate of the Russian fleet, which distinguished itself in August 1854 while repelling an attack by an Anglo-French squadron on the port of Peter and Paul in Kamchatka. In June 1896, the designers began developing the cruiser project, and on May 23, 1897, it was laid down at the shipyard of the New Admiralty (now the Admiralty Shipyards). On the eve of the laying of the ship, according to the decree of Nicholas II of March 31, 1897, the cruiser was given the name "Aurora". On May 11, 1900, the ship was launched, and on September 18, 1903, after sea trials, it was included in the Baltic Fleet.
The project and drawings were developed by the designers of the Baltic Shipyard. Engineer K. M. Tokarevsky supervised the construction of the ship. The cruiser had a displacement of about 7,000 tons, a length of 126.8, a width of 16.8, a draft of 6.6 meters and a top speed of 19 knots. The cruising range at an economic speed of 10 knots was 4000 miles. It was armed with fourteen 152 mm main battery guns, six 76.2 mm anti-aircraft guns, one surface and two underwater torpedo tubes. The ship could take 152 galvanic impact mines. Crew - 723 people.
During the Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905), the Aurora cruiser, as part of the 2nd Pacific squadron, made the transition to the Far East, where it took part in the Tsushima battle, which was unsuccessful for the Russian fleet, during which the commander of the ship, captain 1st rank, died E. R. Egoriev. The ship broke through to the port of Manila, where it was interned. After the end of the war and the signing of peace with Japan, the cruiser returned to Kronstadt in 1906. Many relics remind of the events of the Russo-Japanese War, including the portrait of E. R. Egoriev, placed in a frame made of charred deck planks and cruiser armor pierced by a Japanese shell.

After the repair, the ship became a training ship: midshipmen of the senior companies of the Naval Cadet Corps practiced on it. From May 1907 until the outbreak of the First World War (1914-1918), the Aurora cruiser made six training trips with a total duration of 47 months, covering more than 65 thousand miles. In 1911, at the invitation of the Italian government, the cruiser visited the port of Messina. In 1916, the cruiser was upgraded.
In 1918-1923. the ship was stored in the port of Kronstadt. In January 1923 she was repaired and became a training ship again. On February 23, 1923, it became part of the division of ships of the training detachment of the Naval Forces of the Baltic Sea. In 1927, during the celebration of the 10th anniversary of the October Revolution, the ship was awarded the Order of the Red Banner. Until 1933, the ship sailed continuously, having made several long-distance trips abroad. In 1933, it was put in for a major overhaul. Since 1935, the Aurora has become a non-self-propelled training cruiser, on which cadets of naval educational institutions were trained. During the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945), the cruiser was in the port of Oranienbaum (since 1948 - Lomonosov). In August 1945, it was handed over to the Nakhimov Naval School established in 1944, and on November 17, 1948, it was put into eternal parking at Petrogradskaya Embankment on the Neva.
In November 1947, the cruiser occupied a historical place on the Neva, below the Lieutenant Schmidt bridge, where it stood in October 1917. At the command of the first commissar of the cruiser A.V. Belyshev, a blank shot was fired from the bow gun in memory of the historical event. In 1967, during the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the October Revolution, this shot was repeated. In 1968, the Aurora cruiser received the Order of the October Revolution, becoming the only ship in the Soviet Navy with two orders on its flag. Since 1956, a museum has been operating on the ship, which has become a branch of the Central Naval Museum. In 1960, the cruiser "Aurora" became one of the monuments protected by the state.
In 1984-1987 at the Leningrad Shipbuilding Plant. A. A. Zhdanova (now the Severnaya Verf Shipbuilding Plant) completed the restoration and restoration repair of the Aurora cruiser. On the eve of the 70th anniversary of the October Revolution of 1917, the cruiser again stood at the eternal parking lot at the Petrogradskaya embankment. The transfer of the Aurora from the factory berth to the parking lot took place on August 16, 1987. On October 2, 1987, the museum ship was opened to visitors. July 26, 1992 on the cruiser "Aurora" raised the flag of St. Andrew.
Looking through the periodicals of the first half of the 20th century, one can see that the cruiser Aurora was canonized in 1927 as a symbol of the October Revolution. The former cruiser driver, chairman of the ship committee and commissar of the Aurora, the Bolshevik A. V. Belyshev became almost the main character in the events that took place in Petrograd on October 25, 1917. After 1927 on November 7, not a single solemn meeting and parade on Uritsky Square ( Palace Square) were not held without the participation of Belyshev.
Immediately after the coup, rumors spread throughout Petrograd that the Bolsheviks were shelling the Winter Palace - Rastrelli's creation - with live shells from the Aurora guns. On October 27, the Auror sailors published a letter in the Pravda newspaper: “The crew of the cruiser Avrora protests against the accusations thrown, especially the accusations that are unverified, but throw a stain of shame on the cruiser crew. We declare that we have come not to sack the Winter Palace, not to kill civilians, but to defend against counter-revolutionaries and, if necessary, to die for freedom and revolution. The press writes that the Aurora opened fire on the Winter Palace, but do the gentlemen reporters know that the cannon fire we opened would not have left stone unturned, not only from the Winter Palace, but also from the streets adjacent to it? We appeal to you, workers and soldiers of the city of Petrograd! Do not believe provocative rumors ... As for the shots from the cruiser, only one blank shot was fired from a 6-inch gun, indicating a signal for all ships standing on the Neva, and calling them to vigilance and readiness.
As follows from this document, the purpose of the shot was different. Witnesses of the events do not even mention any “signal for the beginning of the assault on the Winter Palace”. A participant in the uprising in Petrograd, a member of the Bolshevik Party since 1915, N. A. Khovrin wrote: “The blank shot of the Aurora grew into ... a volley! But in fact, everything that has been written and is being written about the Aurora and the sailors in machine-gun belts is, from beginning to end, a distortion of the reality of history. After 15-20 years, a blank shot is called the signal for a general assault on the Winter Palace, and we, the participants in this assault, will learn about this signal 15-20 years later. It is also characteristic that long before the Aurora shot, cannons were fired from the Peter and Paul Fortress - after all, this could also serve as a signal. So, apart from a blank shot, the Aurora has nothing more active, and all attempts to prove that this cruiser played almost a leading role in the uprising are not based on anything and are a complete invention of today's heroes. The absence of a logbook of that time on the cruiser, of course, is due to the not entirely fair game of heroes, who are credited with the high honor of being at the forefront of the Great October Revolution. I can safely say that the logbook of that time was deliberately destroyed as evidence that this "legendary" cruiser is not at all what it is considered to be.

AT a shot from guns located near the stock exchange was fired during the Epiphany parade.
This happened on January 6 (19), 1905 (on the feast of Epiphany), during the blessing of water on the Jordan (on the ice of the Neva), in front of the Winter Palace, in the presence of the emperor and members of his family. Romanov was mortally wounded... but not the emperor. Perhaps it was this shot that became the harbinger of all the troubles of the Russian Empire and led to the "Bloody Sunday" (which happened a few days later), as a result of the 1905 revolution, and then to the October meat grinder.

Jordan on the Neva on the feast of the Epiphany. The royal family descended the Jordan Stairs of the Winter Palace to the river, where the ceremony of consecrating the water took place.

There are still many versions of what it was? Criminal negligence or terrorist attack? The shot rang out at the very beginning of the singing of the troparion. It was like a challenge for the anointed of God! And after all, "accidentally" it was from the gun that was aimed at the emperor (other guns would have fired to the side). As the investigation found out, in the artillery gun accidentally (according to the official version) there was a charge of buckshot after the exercises on January 4th. It's hard for me, as an artilleryman, to believe in chance. These are the basics of artillery... especially when firing is carried out in the direction of the first person of the state and his family in the presence of all the nobility of the city...

Most of the buckshot hit the ice next to the royal pavilion and into the facade of the palace, in 4 windows of which glass was broken. The imperial family, by a lucky chance, did not suffer.

The Novoye Vremya newspaper collected the following information from eyewitnesses: “During the majestic Jordanian ceremony, when Metropolitan Anthony performed the blessing of water and at the signal of a rocket at the moment the cross was immersed, an artillery salute rang out, in an incomprehensible way, in one of the blank charges there were several cartridges with old-style bullets, which, when fired, flew over the Neva, showered part of the Jordan, the entrance box and the columns of the Winter Palace, leaving noticeable marks on them. One bullet pierced the banner of the naval corps, one bullet wounded a policeman; two bullets pierced the upper glass of the Nikolaevsky Hall and flew into the hall itself, falling under choirs.

Despite the shot, there was no panic or stoppage - the ceremony continued as usual. From and to. Banners and standards passed, loud cries were heard in response to the gracious words of the Sovereign, who thanked the troops for the parade.

Nicholas II met the news of the shot and the wounding of the policeman quite calmly, went to see the pierced banner, despite persuasion to return to the palace, remained, and listened to the entire service to the end; then, without accelerating his pace, he returned to his place with the procession. But despite outward restraint and calmness, Nicholas II was frightened, as evidenced by the fact that the tsar left the Winter Palace and moved to Tsarskoye Selo (now Detskoye), where he is behind a triple chain of protection.

The British ambassador, Sir Charles Harding, was also a witness to the incident, which surprised many.

Isn't it a coincidence that a few days later there was "Bloody Sunday"? After all, initially the demonstration was allowed, and only after this incident troops entered the city.

To investigate the accident, a commission was appointed chaired by the head of artillery of the guards corps, Lieutenant General Khitrovo, consisting of the temporary commander of the Life Guards of the 1st Artillery Brigade, Colonel Golovachev, the commander of the Life Guards of the 2nd Artillery Brigade, Major General Ivashentsov, and the commander of the Guards Cavalry artillery brigade of Colonel Prince Masalsky, under the personal supervision and guidance of the inspector of all artillery of His Imperial Highness Grand Duke Sergei Mikhailovich.

The police department and military authorities tried to gloss over the matter and reduce it to the inexperience of the lower ranks and oversight on the part of the officers. The commission, the military and police authorities came to the conclusion "that in the absence of indications of any criminal intent in the case file, the shooting that took place in January can be explained with sufficient probability by non-compliance with the established rules when handling guns in the park and at saluting shooting."

"... in the channel of one of the guns of the 1st platoon of the 3rd battery of the Guards Cavalry Artillery Brigade, one of the training shots remained from the time of the exercise on January 4, and in this form the gun was in the artillery shed for two days. The presence of the forgotten shot in the canal of the gun was would inevitably be discovered if the guns were banned, as required by the charter when firing with blank charges. The remains of the canister shell collected on the snow indicate that it was a training projectile ... "

The case of the St. Petersburg Military District Court No. 144 for 1905, dedicated to this incident, was also mentioned in the book by M.I. Akhuna and V.A. Petrov "Bolsheviks and the army in 1905-1917".

In connection with the incident, the editor of the synodal publication wrote that “it is impossible not to see something special” in the fact that only one policeman by the name of “Romanov” (a sign?) Was mortally wounded. Buckshot hit him right in the eye. In addition, the flagpole of the "nursery of our ill-fated fleet" was shot through - the banner of the naval corps ... " near the Jordanian chapel, standing on a wooden platform, to the left of the entrance and about six steps from the location of His Majesty the Sovereign Emperor, denominator of the Naval Cadet Corps, sergeant major of the midshipman company Salov, one of these bullets hit the banner shaft, knocked off the nail head and, breaking through the banner panel in the right bottom corner, slid down Salov's nose without causing him any damage "... born in a shirt. And the emperor and his family stood ten paces away from him.

The court ruled: to deprive captain Davydov, staff captain Kartsov and lieutenant Rota II: the first two - some special rights and advantages personally and acquired or acquired by service, to exclude from military service without deprivation of ranks and subject to imprisonment in the fortress: Davydov for a year and 6 months, Kartsova - for a year and 5 months, and Rota II - for a year and 4 months, with the legal consequences of this punishment; sub-lieutenant Rota I subject to detention in the guardhouse, with the restriction of some benefits in the service, for 3 months; the junior fireworker Gondarev and the gunner Apalkov to be deprived of some special rights and advantages personally and acquired by the state of service, namely: the first - to the deprivation of the fireworks rank, and to be sent to a disciplinary battalion for two years each ...

"Here, all the military unanimously express that the events of January 6 are an obvious attempt, and that no such accident could have happened. For some reason, there is a rumor in the public that this attempt comes from the very reigning house, which is extremely dissatisfied and says that the Sovereign will destroy all of them.".

Info and pictures (C) Internet. Main sources:
Strumillo B. Shot at the Winter Palace on January 6, 1905 Hard labor and exile. M., 1935. No. 1 (116).
Right. No. 2 dated January 18/31, 1905, column. 106
Lyubimov D.N. Gapon and 9 January. // Questions of history. M., 1965. No. 8, p. 123
Verkhovsky A.I. At the turning point of life. Memories of 1905. // Past. 1924. No. 27-28, p. 160-162
"25 years ago". (From the diaries of L. Tikhomirov.)