a measure of the deviation of a social system or its individual link from the accepted as a reference normal, expected) state, which (deviation) is manifested in a decrease in the level of organization, efficiency of functioning, and the rate of development of the system. E. s. associated with the presence of objective uncertainty in the state of the environment, human activities, errors in management, planning, lack or underuse of knowledge (information) in the process of organizing (setting up) the considered system of an enterprise, institution, industry National economy, society as a whole. E. s. not just a measure of disorder, disorder social systems, but also a measure of the relevance (inconsistency) of their state to the accepted target settings. Through its prism, one can see that even with an ideal external (formal) order, the system can function inefficiently, and managerial and other employees included in it, for all their external workload, clarity and diligence, can be occupied, in fact, of little use and even destructive , from point of view ultimate goal system, activity (“anti-work”). The whole point is not in formal discipline (order), although it is, of course, necessary, but in the correspondence of the internal state of the system and each of its elements to the set integral goals. It follows that in the field of management rationalization social processes Fundamentally new reserves are opened up if this rationalization is based on the problem of reducing the entropy of the system. The introduction of the category of entropy into physics made it possible to estimate the coefficient useful action(efficiency) thermodynamic systems, which turned out to be very low (2-4%). By analogy with this, the entropy approach to management systems social nature allows you to detect their surprisingly low efficiency, that is, efficiency, which is associated with a large deviation of their real state from the optimum. E. s. unlike entropy in physics, it is not a formal mathematical, but a substantive category. This is a value that allows you to evaluate the functioning of the social system: how much it does not reach or deviate from the reference level. Such an assessment is carried out in a sociological way, primarily by methods expert analysis, historical and sociological research, structural-functional approach, etc. Other methods, for example, mathematical modeling based on the solution of scalar equations are less suitable here, since they allow us to characterize only outer sides functioning of social systems, their formal orderliness. In this case, it is important to open internal state systems, which requires a meaningful analysis of the goals and functions of their individual elements (and this can be done, for example, by an expert). With the concept of E. with. tied new approach to labor processes and to the time budget of employees, requiring a distinction between the concepts of “work” and “useful return” of employees and labor collectives(see Work). It seems trivial, but when organizing labor processes, one concept is often replaced by another. From the standpoint of the entropy approach, the well-known call “Increase in work!” requires analytical consideration. Rather, we need to add in useful returns, and not in work as such, because we hardly work less than other peoples, but we have too much useless labor and useless products (with a growing shortage of useful services and products). Surveys show that up to 60-70% of the working time of managerial and up to 50-60% of the labor costs of scientific and engineering workers are spent on the implementation of little useful, and sometimes simply meaningless procedures, unnecessary regulations, etc. The entropy of social systems has many faces, it manifests itself in the swelling of management structures, the growth of bureaucracy, an avalanche of document flows, cumbersome approvals, endless and little meaningful meetings, meetings, inspections, interdepartmental "inconsistencies", mismanagement, and spontaneity. Anti-entropy measures are largely reduced not only to the elimination of these negative manifestations, but also to increase information culture population, the formation of all employees modern thinking, an analytical approach to life, the ability to distinguish between useful and useless work, as well as informative and “empty” (“noise”) messages and documents, intolerance to disinformation, etc. Of paramount importance in lowering E. s. has activities for the informatization of society. Arming sociology with an entropy approach to social processes will allow it to sensitively detect the appearance of deformations in society. However, the application of this approach requires the development of its methodology and methodology, conceptual apparatus what social cognitology serves as a science that studies the principles and mechanisms of accumulation and use of knowledge in social systems.
Other related news:
Entropy social- a measure of the deviation of a social system or its individual link from the accepted as a reference (normal, expected) state, which (deviation) manifests itself in a decrease in the level of organization, efficiency of functioning, and the pace of the developed system. Social entropy is associated with the presence of objective uncertainty in the state of the environment, people's activities, errors in management, planning, lack or underuse of knowledge (information) in the process of organizing (setting up) the system in question - enterprises, institutions, branches of the national economy, society as a whole. Social entropy is not just a measure of disorder, disorder of social systems, but also a measure of the relevance (inconsistency) of their state to the accepted targets. Through its prism, one can see that even with an ideal external (formal) order, the system can function inefficiently, and managerial and other employees included in it, for all their external workload, clarity and diligence, can be occupied, in fact, of little use and even destructive , from the point of view of the ultimate goal of the system, activity ("anti-work"). The whole point is not in formal discipline (order), although it is, of course, necessary, but in the correspondence of the internal state of the system and each of its elements to the set integral goals. It follows that fundamentally new reserves open up in the field of rationalization of the management of social processes, if the task of reducing the entropy of the system is taken as the basis for this rationalization.
The introduction of the category of entropy into physics made it possible to estimate the coefficient of performance (COP) of thermodynamic systems, which turned out to be very low (2-4%). By analogy with this, the entropy approach to management systems of a social nature makes it possible to detect their surprisingly low efficiency, that is, efficiency, which is associated with a large deviation of their real state from the optimum. Social entropy, in contrast to entropy in physics, is not a formal mathematical, but a substantive category. This is a value that allows you to evaluate the functioning of the social system: how much it does not reach or deviate from the reference level. Such an assessment is carried out in a sociological way - primarily by the methods of expert analysis, historical and sociological research, structural-functional approach, etc.
Other methods, for example, mathematical modeling based on solving scalar equations, are less suitable here, since they allow us to characterize only the external aspects of the functioning of social systems, their formal order. In this case, it is important to reveal the internal state of the systems, which requires a meaningful analysis of the goals and functions of their individual elements (and this can be done, for example, by an expert). With the concept of social entropy, a new approach to labor processes and to the time budget of workers is connected, requiring a distinction between the concepts of "work" and "useful return" of workers and labor collectives. It seems trivial, but when organizing labor processes, one concept is often replaced by another. From the standpoint of the entropy approach, the well-known call “Increase in work!” requires analytical consideration. Rather, we need to add in useful returns, and not in work as such, because we hardly work less than other peoples, but we have too much useless labor and useless products (with a growing shortage of useful services and products). Surveys show that up to 60-70% of the working time of managerial and up to 50-60% of the labor costs of scientific and engineering workers are spent on the implementation of little useful, and sometimes simply meaningless procedures, unnecessary regulations, etc.
The entropy of social systems is "many-sided", it manifests itself in the swelling of management structures, the growth of bureaucracy, an avalanche of document flows, cumbersome approvals, endless and little meaningful meetings, meetings, inspections, interdepartmental "inconsistencies", mismanagement, spontaneity. Anti-entropy measures are largely reduced not only to the elimination of these negative manifestations, but also to increasing the information culture of the population, the formation of modern thinking in all employees, an analytical approach to life, the ability to distinguish between useful and useless work, as well as more informative and "empty" ( "noise") messages and documents, intolerance to misinformation, etc. Of paramount importance in reducing social entropy is the implementation of measures to informatize society.
Arming sociology with an entropic approach to social processes will allow it to sensitively capture the manifestation of deformations in society. However, the application of this approach requires the development of its methodology and methodology, the conceptual apparatus, which is served by social cognitology - a science that studies the principles and mechanisms of accumulation and use of knowledge in social systems.
Kamlesh D. Patel explains how the second law of thermodynamics plays a role in our relationships, leading to decay and destruction, and he also shares with us ways to overcome social entropy, resulting in stability and harmony.
What is entropy?
Let's try to understand it in a practical way. You bring home a book from the library, then your father gives you another book. Your girlfriend brings you magazines and you already have music CDs. It's all piled up on a small table in your room, so the table is now littered. The room is also a mess: clothes here, socks there, a towel hanging somewhere. This is an example of a broken system, it is out of order.
The mess becomes unpleasant to you, and you do the cleaning. Put each book in its place
wash your clothes and make your bed. Now the room looks cleaner than before, but only up to
until you start bringing more more books and things. Then the system will fall apart again and fall into disarray. Maintaining order requires constant energy costs.
Thus, entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness of a system. The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy increases with time. It reflects the instability of the system over time if there is no external influence to stabilize it.
AT human relations we interact with each other every day and our relationship
also come into disarray. We let things build up inside of us. The clutter inside increases as we bring in more and more things, like books and clothes in our room. We keep accumulating things and one day what we have accumulated explodes if we don't take any action. An effort must be made to stabilize any relationship and smooth out differences in a way that does not keep them forever. But do we need to do this every time we make a mistake? Do we need to buy the other person ice cream or candy to comfort them every time? This would mean that ongoing investment is needed to maintain the relationship.
If you have to constantly put in effort during a quarrel or quarrel with a friend or family member, then each time you will need more and more effort. You may even have to buy a Mercedes if you can afford it! At the same time, it is our duty to love each other at all costs. No doubt you will be hurt in the process, you will be required to a large number of energy, but if you are ready for this, then the relationship will improve.
If in a family you have to endure each other, then this requires a constant contribution of energy. If constant emotional return is required of you, the family is destroyed, even if you continue to be together.
Whereas if there is love and acceptance in the family, you do not need to constantly offer
ice cream or some heavenly vacation to mend the relationship. It goes without saying that you accept each other with love. Hence the conclusion: the love in your heart is what stabilizes the relationship. Now everything is all right. There are more high level acceptance.
I'm not talking about tolerance. Tolerance can be a great virtue, but when you feel, "I can't take this person's faults anymore," love can smooth things over and things will get better. Where does this love come from? From pure heart- truthful, sincere heart.
Distrust kills relationships, but in a family where we were taught to love, sacrifice ourselves and stay pure, in such a family we are able to give up everything. We can eradicate
incompatibility by understanding this principle of entropy.
When I am in a state of constant love, the need for a constant input of energy disappears and the costs are reduced to zero. When the need for effort is reduced to zero, this is the most stable relationship, the most stable family, where I don’t have to make excuses: “I did it because…”, “I didn’t want to do it because…”. Where there is love, there is no need for explanations.
ABOUT KAMLESH PATEL
FROM young years Kamlesh Patel was interested in spirituality and meditation. He became a disciple of his Guru in 1976 when he was still a student. Now he is the fourth spiritual leader of the Sahaj Marg system, based on the principles of Raja Yoga meditation.
Kamlesh has a wife and two sons. He is a role model for many students of spirituality seeking to find the perfect combination of Eastern heart and Western mind. Traveling actively, he finds mutual language with people different origin and different views. Special attention he devotes to fellowship with the youth.
Magazine "Heartfulness" №2
English entropy, social; German socialentropie. The measure of social deviation. system or its subsystem from the reference (normal, expected) state, when the deviation manifests itself in a decrease in the level of organization, efficiency of functioning, and the rate of development of the system.
Great Definition
Incomplete definition ↓
Entropy social
a measure of the deviation of a social system or its individual link from the accepted as a reference normal, expected) state, which (deviation) is manifested in a decrease in the level of organization, efficiency of functioning, and the rate of development of the system. E. s. associated with the presence of objective uncertainty in the state of the environment, people's activities, errors in management, planning, lack or underuse of knowledge (information) in the process of organizing (setting up) the considered system of an enterprise, institution, branch of the national economy, society as a whole. E. s. not just a measure of disorder, disorder of social systems, but also a measure of the relevance (inconsistency) of their state to the accepted targets. Through its prism, one can see that even with an ideal external (formal) order, the system can function inefficiently, and managerial and other employees included in it, for all their external workload, clarity and diligence, can be occupied, in fact, of little use and even destructive , from the point of view of the ultimate goal of the system, activity ("anti-work"). The whole point is not in formal discipline (order), although it is, of course, necessary, but in the correspondence of the internal state of the system and each of its elements to the set integral goals. It follows that fundamentally new reserves open up in the field of rationalization of the management of social processes, if the task of reducing the entropy of the system is taken as the basis for this rationalization. The introduction of the category of entropy into physics made it possible to estimate the coefficient of performance (COP) of thermodynamic systems, which turned out to be very low (2-4%). By analogy with this, the entropy approach to management systems of a social nature makes it possible to detect their surprisingly low efficiency, that is, efficiency, which is associated with a large deviation of their real state from the optimum. E. s. unlike entropy in physics, it is not a formal mathematical, but a substantive category. This is a value that allows you to evaluate the functioning of the social system: how much it does not reach or deviate from the reference level. Such an assessment is carried out sociologically, primarily by the methods of expert analysis, historical and sociological research, structural-functional approach, etc. Other methods, for example, mathematical modeling based on the solution of scalar equations, are less suitable here, since they allow characterizing only the external aspects of the functioning of social systems, their formal ordering. In this case, it is important to reveal the internal state of the systems, which requires a meaningful analysis of the goals and functions of their individual elements (and this can be done, for example, by an expert). With the concept of E. with. a new approach to labor processes and to the time budget of employees is connected, requiring a distinction between the concepts of "work" and "useful return" of employees and labor collectives (see Work). It seems trivial, but when organizing labor processes, one concept is often replaced by another. From the standpoint of the entropy approach, the well-known call “Increase in work!” requires analytical consideration. Rather, we need to add in useful returns, and not in work as such, because we hardly work less than other peoples, but we have too much useless labor and useless products (with a growing shortage of useful services and products). Surveys show that up to 60-70% of the working time of managerial and up to 50-60% of the labor costs of scientific and engineering workers are spent on the implementation of little useful, and sometimes simply meaningless procedures, unnecessary regulations, etc. The entropy of social systems has many faces, it manifests itself in the swelling of management structures, the growth of bureaucracy, an avalanche of document flows, cumbersome approvals, endless and little meaningful meetings, meetings, inspections, interdepartmental "inconsistencies", mismanagement, and spontaneity. Anti-entropy measures largely come down not only to eliminating these negative manifestations, but also to improving the information culture of the population, the formation of modern thinking in all employees, an analytical approach to life, the ability to distinguish between useful and useless work, as well as informative and “empty” (“noise” ”) messages and documents, intolerance to disinformation, etc. Of paramount importance in lowering E. s. has activities for the informatization of society. Arming sociology with an entropic approach to social processes will allow it to sensitively detect the appearance of deformations in society. However, the application of this approach requires the development of its methodology and methodology, the conceptual apparatus, which is served by social cognitology, a science that studies the principles and mechanisms of accumulation and use of knowledge in social systems.
