Cossack lullaby

Sleep, my beautiful baby,
Baiushki bye.
Quietly looks at the clear moon
Into your cradle
I will tell fairy tales
I will sing a song;
Well you dozed off, closing your eyes,
Baiushki bye.

The Terek flows over the stones,
Splashing muddy shaft;
An evil Chechen crawls ashore,
Sharpens his dagger;
But your father is an old warrior,
Forged in Battle:
Sleep, baby, be calm
Baiushki bye.

You will know, there will be time
swearing life;
Feel free to put your foot in the stirrup
And take a gun.
I am a fighting saddle
I'll rip it with silk...
Sleep, my dear child,
Baiushki bye.

You will be a hero in appearance
And a Cossack soul.
I will go out to accompany you -
You wave your hand...
How many bitter tears furtively
I will shed that night! ..
Sleep, my angel, quietly, sweetly,
Baiushki bye.

I will languish in melancholy,
Wait inconsolably;
I'll pray all day
Guessing at night;
I'll think you're bored
You are in a foreign land...
Sleep well until you know worries
Baiushki bye.

I will give you on the road
Saint pattern:
You are his, praying to God,
Put in front of you;
Yes, preparing for a dangerous battle,
Remember your mother...
Sleep, my beautiful baby,
Baiushki bye.

1840 cossack lullaby

Sleep, my beautiful baby,
Bayushki-bye.
Quiet month looks clear
In your cradle.
I "ll affect tales
Sing a song;
Well you dose, eyes closed,
Bayushki-bye.

Flowing over rocks Terek
Splashing muddy shaft ;
Angry Chechen crawlers ashore
Sharpening his dagger ;
But your father is an old warrior
Hardened in battle:
Sleep, baby, be calm,
Bayushki-bye.

Sam will know the time will come
Expletive habitation;
Boldly vdenesh foot in the stirrup
And take the gun.
I sedeltse martial
Razoshyu silk ...
Sleep, my child, native,
Bayushki-bye.

You'll be the hero with an
And Cossack soul.
I get to accompany you
You mahnesh hand...
How many bitter tears sneak
I will pour out on the night! ..
Sleep, my angel, quiet, sweet,
Bayushki-bye.

I "ll be longing to languish,
Inconsolably wait ;
I will pray the whole day,
At night wondering;
I will think that you miss
You're in a strange land ...
Sleep well, while worries do not know
Bayushki-bye.

I "ll give you on the road
holy scapular:
You did, molyasya God
put it in front of him;
Yes, ready to battle dangerous
Remember your mother...
Sleep, my beautiful baby,
Bayushki-bye.

1840

"PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM" is a communist attempt to introduce monotheism in Russia with an "eternally living" god - Lenin. The idea of ​​internationalism is very good in itself, and saving for Russia. Now it has become even more relevant.

But, as in TRINITARY CHRISTIANITY, declaring a person God is a disastrous path, started by the Romanov tsars in 1649. Prior to this, the Savior in Russia was considered a Prophet (ie the person who wrote the Psalms, ie proclaimed the One God). It was just as disastrous for Russia to declare Lenin a god and not a man.

The destruction of monotheism (God is one) was laid down in Russia immediately after the "Time of Troubles" (beginning of the 17th century), as soon as Western ideologists came to Russia, along with the Romanov dynasty (Council Code of 1649). Slavery was introduced in Russia under the auspices of the supposedly "Greeks", but in fact the totalitarian Catholics who lost in Europe as a result of the Reformation. Greek was introduced in all Orthodox schools, sometimes Latin in addition, throughout the 18th century!
How did the Russian people “break down” and become slaves so quickly? More than 20% of the population was destroyed under Alexei Mikhailovich, and more than 30% under Peter I (according to official data from modern Russian historians). This is where you break! Stalin could only envy such a scale.

It should be noted that the ideology of slavery introduced in the "new Orthodox" has not disappeared anywhere even today. In 1861, the tsar's manifesto decided nothing in essence. By 1917, the "land question" was just as acute. The peasants slowly began to come to life, fleeing to the city. The landowner remained. And the "right of the first night" with the bride from the side of the groom's father remained. WILDLIFE FULL! To what extent did these Romanovs (Romans) accustom the people to disgrace!

The main thing that the "Roman" Romanovs did was that they abolished the religion (ideology) of Ancient Russia. (Ideology in any country then had a religious character). Instead of the religion of the Psalms (the Religion of Freedom), the author of which in all Russian chronicles is the Prophet-Savior, who proclaimed Monotheism, in Russia, in 1649, they brought the religion of slavery and obscurantism. They banned the Russian language in worship, introduced serfdom in the name of the New Trinitarian Church. They replaced the name of the Vice-Savior with a Greek name unknown in Russia. And most importantly, they proclaimed the "disorder of the personality" of this worthy person. (See article "Trinity in Russia").

But the Prophet "Isesi", which in Egyptian means "truth", never claimed to have a "disorder of personality." The only thing he initially admitted was that, like any pharaoh, he was forced to admit that he was the "Son of God", such was the then ideological tradition. (By the way, the international word Essence means "essence", or, more simply, "truth"). Then he could not stand this lie, and declared himself as the "Son of Man." For which, in fact, he was crucified ...

In Islam, the name of the ancient Prophet has remained so to this day - Isa. The Russian (as well as the Egyptian) symbol of the Prophet: ATON, is written on a halo on all icons (His images) before the Romanovs. It means SUN (nimbus) or SOLAR (Man under a halo). In Greek it will be: "Chrysos" or "Christ". The Romanovs banned the Russian word, because a MEANING UNKNOWN IN RUSSIA was embedded in the Greek word - "PERSONAL DISORDER". At the same time they brought in the Greek tradition of slavery, unknown in Russia before.

The monotheistic religion (as Islam and Judaism) reappeared in Russia only under Catherine II. She did this only for the sake of preserving the slavery of the serfs "Kh (k) Christians". For this slavery was not regulated by anything, except for the "church lists" of the Orthodox Church.

Why am I writing all this?

Although I am a scientist, but not enough to go into the Cosmic Mind. The intergalactic "computer" is incomprehensible.
Although, it was on the Cosmic essence of God that our Prophet-Savior insisted ("Light (Sun) of Truth", in ancient Egyptian, and in Russian, too, there was "Light of Truth", the Sun of Truth" [before the Romanovs]. "Chrysos", in - in Greek it will also be "Sunny"). It is strange why in ancient Egyptian and in Russian - the same thing, because it is officially considered that between Ancient Egypt (18th dynasty) and Russia, which emerged in the 800s AD - about 2000 years. And the Psalms of which our Prophet is the author in Egyptian are identical in the text of the Novgorod Psalter, written in Russian 1000 years ago. In fact, the Egyptian Prophet lived in the 800s AD. This is easily calculated from astronomy. Why lie ?

Reviews

What should I do as an atheist?

It makes no difference to me whether God is one, or he is one in three persons, or out of many...

There is such a parable.

Lecturer - anti-religious lecturer:

"Everyone knows that there is no God, and we all arose as a result of evolution."

Question from the floor:

And what preceded biological evolution?
- Chemical evolution.
Where did matter come from in the universe?
- As a result of the Primary Explosion.
- And why did the Primary Explosion occur?
- God knows...

Another phrase from the Strugatskys:

"After all, I'm an atheist ... it seems to me ..."

Communism is in a deep, protracted internal crisis, and I still see no signs of a way out of this crisis.

The collapse of communism was a blow to all worldview systems, including logic and common sense, not only Alexander Zinoviev wrote about this, but Professor Kafyrin also spoke at that very memorable meeting of the Marxist Platform on August 22, 1991.

Atheism is also shaken, because modern scientific ideas about the structure of the universe and matter do not leave room for simplified mechanistic models, and therefore are accessible to understanding only by a narrow circle of specialists, which creates a feeling of unknowability of the surrounding World in the layman.

The train of religion has also left, any, both traditional and non-traditional.

All social science in general is in a deep crisis.

There are no revolutionary movements (except for marginal ones, like us), and the elite skillfully uses the protest moods among the masses in their own interests.

The only hope is that some processes are gradually going on in society that we do not notice yet, but which will soon manifest themselves and prompt the answer to your questions.

There are grounds for such a prejudice. My grandfather told me that in the 10s of the 20th century, before the revolution, there were also decadent moods, and everyone was waiting for the end to come (they said that natural resources were running out and ahead of the war that would destroy all life on Earth). And the fantasy then was appropriate.

Salvation then came through a revolution, which was unexpected even for the Bolsheviks themselves (Lenin learned about the February revolution from the newspapers).

Who knows, maybe now somewhere in Cologne, Osaka, Omsk or San Francisco a curly-haired boy is growing up, who in 10 years will say: "We will go the other way."
To be honest, I don’t see much point in introducing a new-old religion to replace the dominant ones now ...

Much of what you write is so new to me that it needs to be digested. I will refrain from my judgments on this topic for the time being: I have too little knowledge on this subject, too many contradictions.

But I ask you (namely you) to look at my article entitled "On Social Racism", which I am preparing and will publish in the next few days on "Prose ...", and express your opinion.

The horror that fettered the consciousness of the inhabitants of the South-East of Ukraine was embodied in a specific image - an evil, bearded Wahhabi Chechen, killing Ukrainians in cold blood.

Eyewitnesses and participants in the fighting will definitely remember the Chechens, they will be shown in pictures and videos. They are the last, lethal argument in the dispute about whether Russia is fighting on the territory of Donbass. They are remembered by US Secretary of State Kerry, our representative at the UN Security Council rhetorically asks about them: “So far we have not received an answer, what are hundreds of Chechens doing in Ukraine? Do they defend Slavic Orthodoxy?”

Well, all right, Kadyrov's oaths do not convince us. But the disgraced Prime Minister of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, Akhmed Zakayev, also said that Chechens do not fight in Ukraine.

Why do we put so much pressure on the word "Chechen", why is the nationality of terrorists so important to us?

Does “Svyatorus” Babai defend Slavic Orthodoxy on our territory? Isn't what Girkin and Ponomarev are doing more cynical and inhumane than the actions of those whom we call Chechens?

And don't you think that by scaring each other with Chechens, we somehow began to talk less about the professionals of the FSB and the GRU, who torture our compatriots in our cities?

Professor of Ilia University (Georgia), well-known journalist Oleg Panfilov carefully studied the videos and pictures of Chechens from the so-called Vostok battalion and posted his thoughts on LiveJournal.

“It seems to me that someone is setting up the Chechens quite well. I will clarify - real Chechens. Not Kadyrovtsy,” he writes in his blog. And shares his observations. Apparently, Panfilov believes, “some people who really look like Chechens deliberately do everything to be called“ Chechens ”- the index finger up is the sign of Allah, the letter“ alif ”, one even has a Chechen cap - pyas, that is, these people want to be called Chechens.”

There are other details as well. Not a single video clip, Panfilov notes, is even a hint of Chechen speech or a characteristic Chechen pronunciation or phonetics. And the cigarettes in the teeth of the "Chechens" cause astonishment - Ramzan Kadyrov has a categorical ban on smoking, "they would fly out in no time." In the CNN story, these "Chechens" act like they've never been in combat, "rolling their asses over the side of a truck."

“Look at the photo - a man with an armband “East” (!), He is not a Chechen. Moreover, it is completely absurd to put on a bandage - as if intentionally for a photo and a television camera.

“I still can’t understand why this fake hodgepodge of“ Chechens ”, but someone really needs it?” - Panfilov shares his doubts.

For us, living in central and western Ukraine, the phrase “Vostok Battalion” does not mean anything special - except that this is how a pack of bandits - immigrants from Russia - calls themselves.

But many Russians are shivering from him. According to the media, people who go out to Bolotnaya Street in Moscow sometimes wait in horror: will the government throw Chechens from the Vostok battalion, hidden somewhere in the Moscow region, to disperse the rally? ..

Such a "wild division" of General Kornilov, who came straight from 1917.

The Georgians encountered them in August 2008. Then in the vanguard of the Russian army, which occupied South Ossetia, there were armored vehicles plastered with black-bearded Caucasians of terrible appearance. This was the Vostok battalion, assembled, as the Russians write, from former defenders of Chechen independence. The FSB then carried out a Jesuit operation - having physically eliminated Dudayev and Maskhadov, popular among the people, they framed the marginal stranger Khattab for the Chechen opposition. Dissatisfied with him - some for money, and some to avenge their humiliation - went to the service of the federals. The battalion was directly subordinate to the GRU and was used both in Chechnya and in other territories where the people were dissatisfied with the actions of the federal authorities.

Did real Chechens fight in it? Or was it already then a product of propaganda? It is hard to say. In 2008, the battalion was apparently disbanded, as it was headed by Kadyrov's personal enemy. But the Russians still believe in its existence...

Why did Chechens become evil demons for Russians? Why not Ingush, not Ossetians, not Kabardians with Balkars?

This is an old story. Those who studied back in Soviet times remember reading from Lermontov: “An evil Chechen is crawling ashore, sharpening his dagger…”. Pushkin, by the way, also has something similar. The fact is that the Chechens, like the Ukrainians, have been fighting for independence from the Russian Empire for hundreds of years. So, they could not help but be enemies of the throne. And if so, then it was necessary to present them as enemies of the Russian people and Christianity as a whole.

Like the Crimean Tatars, the Chechen people were deported in 1944. In two weeks, under the personal leadership of Beria, 500,000 Chechens were forcibly taken to Central Asia. Those who could not move quickly - the elderly, the disabled, children - were shot (the KGB officers themselves reported about these "excesses"). In the 90s, information appeared in the open press and again was classified information about the 700 inhabitants of the village of Khaibakh who were burned alive ...

It so happened that during Yeltsin's time, Chechnya could gain independence following Ukraine. Then, in the 90s, many of us were worried about the Chechen people and wept when the FSB killers killed the first president of Chechnya-Ichkeria, military general, hero of the Soviet Union Dzhokhar Dudayev.

“Chechens remember how our refugees found refuge in Ukrainian cities, and we will never forget it,” Zakayev writes in an address to Ukrainians. And indeed it is. Refugees, usually women with children and the elderly, were hidden in Ukrainian families. Because in those days, the FSB agents felt at ease in Ukraine, and there were cases of the abduction of the wives of field commanders by the federals (obviously to use them as hostages).

Why, then, later in Ukraine, they started talking about Chechens exclusively as “bandits”?

Yes, the movement for the independence of Chechnya has become marginalized to some extent. But the reason is not only in this - but in television, cinema and popular literature. Even on our Ukrainian TV screen, we see Russian fighters with Chechens as bad guys. And what can we say about the Russian "zomboyaschik"? The Chechen theme has crept even into science fiction: in novels-"katatastofs" one can read about Chechnya almost as a pole of world evil. Such a Russian Mordor.

And this, do not forget, they write about the subject of the Russian Federation ...

All this "spiritual food" is readily absorbed by the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. Especially in the South and East. Therefore, to the question-reflection of Panfilov: is it not the Ukrainian army that is trying to intimidate the Chechens in this way, "propagandists from all sorts of Donburas and Luganda", I will answer in absentia - no.

Our soldiers, in fact, are not afraid of the Chechens. This horror story is designed for civilians. First of all, on those who first supported the separatists, and then changed their minds. Like, "Chechens will not forgive betrayal." Another task is to suppress peaceful resistance: demonstrations, pickets, just collective protests against terror (as was the case in Gorlovka and Slavyansk). And, finally, sow terror in those villages that the bandits are going to capture...

A survey conducted by a Donetsk newspaper after the “triumphant” appearance of KamAZ trucks with bearded “Chechens” on the central square of the city showed that the proportion of residents who are unsure of their safety has increased to 60%, and 20% would like to leave Donetsk forever.

Do you think that the mass exodus of Donetsk residents will upset Putin? Against! He wants territory, not people. People will be brought in.

But that's just part of the game! "Barbarian Chechens" are also needed in order to set off the "good" Abwehrs and Babaevs. So that the intimidated citizens feel joy and relief when the “wild division” is replaced by good-natured Ryazan guys from the regular Russian army. And to the applause of the Donetsk people they will liberate Donetsk... from the Chechens.

But this, I think, is not all. The "Chechen" theme in Russia is not a matter of tactics, but part of a strategy. And even more - this is one of the fundamental foundations of the existence of the empire: it clearly manifested the policy of pitting peoples against each other. It is likely that the Kremlin strategists are counting: having learned about the death of fellow countrymen and fellow believers at the hands of “wild Bandera”, the Chechens (in whose traditions the concept of blood feud has not yet been erased) will go en masse as volunteers to the Donbass ...

Let's not dance to Putin's tune. After all, Zakayev said smart words, the meaning of which is as follows: those who serve Kadyrov and the Russian Federation fought against their own people, which means that it is wrong to call them Chechens.

Hired killers do not have a nationality.

Let's get this on our nose. After all, who knows, maybe just at this moment Putin sends his "Ukrainian battalion" to pacify the rebellious Chechens. Cobbled together, indeed, from former citizens of Ukraine - traitors from the Crimean "golden eagle".

Yevhen Yakunov, Ukrinform.

Cossack lullaby

Sleep, my beautiful baby,
Baiushki bye.
Quietly looks at the clear moon
Into your cradle
I will tell fairy tales
I will sing a song;
Well you dozed off, closing your eyes,
Baiushki bye.

The Terek flows over the stones,
Splashing muddy shaft;
An evil Chechen crawls ashore,
Sharpens his dagger;
But your father is an old warrior,
Forged in Battle:
Sleep, baby, be calm
Baiushki bye.

You will know, there will be time
swearing life;
Feel free to put your foot in the stirrup
And take a gun.
I am a fighting saddle
I'll rip it with silk...
Sleep, my dear child,
Baiushki bye.

You will be a hero in appearance
And a Cossack soul.
I will go out to accompany you -
You wave your hand...
How many bitter tears furtively
I will shed that night! ..
Sleep, my angel, quietly, sweetly,
Baiushki bye.

I will languish in melancholy,
Wait inconsolably;
I'll pray all day
Guessing at night;
I'll think you're bored
You are in a foreign land...
Sleep well until you know worries
Baiushki bye.

I will give you on the road
Saint pattern:
You are his, praying to God,
Put in front of you;
Yes, preparing for a dangerous battle,
Remember your mother...
Sleep, my beautiful baby,
Baiushki bye.

Facebook began to actively block the accounts of users who use the word "crest" in the network space.

Account journalist Maxim Kononenko banned for posting a poem Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin"My family tree", containing this word:

My grandfather did not sell pancakes,
Didn't wax the king's boots,
I did not sing with the court deacons,
I did not jump from crests to princes.

Russia has a law “On counteracting extremist activity”, which prohibits, among other things, inciting social, racial, national or religious hatred, promoting the exclusivity, superiority or inferiority of a person on the basis of his social, racial, national, religious or linguistic affiliation.

What other works of Russian literature would be banned if someone had the idea to apply the law “On counteracting extremist activity” to them?

Most probably, it would Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky- the author of the most intolerant words, who declared: “The owner of the Russian land is only one Russian. So it was and always will be." That's so radical. If the writer had lived in our time, he would hardly have gotten away with one criticism. In general, in Russian literature over the centuries, it turns out, extremist sentiments flourished in all their diversity.

Fedor Dostoevsky. Photo: commons.wikimedia.org

Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol, for example, one would have to give explanations for such a paragraph in Taras Bulba: “- Hang all the Jews! came from the crowd. “Let them not sew skirts for their Zhids out of priestly robes!” Let them not put badges on holy Easter! Melt them all, bastards, in the Dnieper! These words, uttered by someone from the crowd, flew like lightning through all the heads, and the crowd rushed to the suburbs with a desire to cut all the Jews.

Nikolay Gogol. Photo: commons.wikimedia.org

Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin also did not keep away from it. So, in the poem "Black Shawl" we find the following words:

One day I called merry guests;
A despicable Jew knocked on my door;

Pyotr Konchalovsky. "Pushkin in Mikhailovsky". Photo: reproduction

But at Mayakovsky is no longer just an anti-Semitic attitude, but what would be called “a public knowingly false accusation of a person holding a public position in the Russian Federation”:

Russia
Jews
sell to Jews
and personnel
officers
already under the hood!

Vladimir Mayakovsky. Photo: www.russianlook.com

Nationalism in relation to the Caucasian peoples was a natural consequence of protracted and bloody wars in the Caucasus. And all the writers who visited those parts were imbued with an atmosphere of confrontation. It even got into Pushkin's "The Tale of the Dead Princess and the Seven Bogatyrs":

Brothers in a friendly crowd
Going out for a walk
Shoot gray ducks
Amuse the right hand
Sorochina hurry in the field,
Or a head with broad shoulders
Cut off the Tatar
Or etch from the forest
Pyatigorsk Circassian.

The absolute champion in hostility to the peoples of the mountains can be considered Mikhail Yurievich Lermontov.

So, in the "Hero of Our Time" from Maxim Maksimych, you can hear many harsh words about the peoples of the Caucasus. For example, about Ossetians:

"Stupid people! he answered. — Would you believe it? they can't do anything, they're incapable of any education! At least our Kabardians or Chechens, although they are robbers, naked, are desperate heads, and these have no desire for weapons either: you will not see a decent dagger on any of them!

Or: “Tatars are better for me: at least they don’t drink ...”.

From there: “Fear God. After all, you are not a cursed Chechen, but an honest Christian.”

Less often, but there are references to European peoples. So, - not only a famous poet, but also an experienced traveler - in the poem "Abyssinian Songs" comes to the following conclusion:

Rhinos trample our durro
Monkeys pick figs.
Worse than monkeys and rhinos
White vagrants Italians.

Nikolai Gumilyov. Photo: commons.wikimedia.org

Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev I would have to explain why the Germans did not please his hero. The hero of the book "Fathers and Sons" directly states: “I am a German, a sinful person, I do not favor. I no longer mention the Russian Germans: it is known what kind of birds they are. But the German Germans are not to my liking ... "

Ivan Turgenev. Fragment of a painting by Ilya Repin 1874. Photo: Public Domain

In the poem “To the Slanderers of Russia”, Pushkin addresses the French deputies and journalists with a clear challenge:

So send it to us, vitii,
His angry sons:
There is a place for them in the fields of Russia,
Among the coffins that are not alien to them.

Vladimir Mayakovsky in his "Paris" unexpectedly calls the city of love "a place of decay", Paris "smart and stupid" and "boulevard mouthers", and ends with a generally shocking appeal:

Make up your mind tower
get up now everyone
turning Paris from top to bottom!

But even more shocking may seem the extremist attitude of writers against Russia itself! At Alexander Blok in the poem "The Twelve" we meet:

Comrade, hold the rifle, don't be afraid!
Let's fire a bullet at Holy Russia -

Alexander Blok. Photo: commons.wikimedia.org

But the words from "Hadji Murat" sound the most Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy: “Nobody spoke about hatred of Russians. The feeling experienced by all Chechens, young and old, was stronger than hatred.” Isn't thinking about "feelings of disgust and contempt for Russians" extremist material?

Leo Tolstoy in his office. Photo: RIA Novosti

Another problem is the insult to the feelings of believers in Russian literature. aforementioned Fedor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky writes in the novel "Demons": "The Russian god has already given in to the 'cheap stuff'."

BUT Sergey Yesenin continues:

I'm not one of those who recognize the priests,
Who implicitly believes in God,
Who is ready to break his forehead,
Praying at every church threshold.

I don't like slave religion
Submissive from century to century,
And I have faith in wonderful words -
I believe in the knowledge and power of Man.

And how many more works could we lose by reasoning like this! The forbidden books would make a library of impressive size. This is what happens if you tear out individual phrases from the text and give the words of the writers extraneous meanings that are absolutely alien to the classical work.