What is the name of the shock preceding the main seismic. Impact of seismic waves

Introduction
Physics is one of the greatest and most important sciences studied by man. Its presence can be seen in all spheres of life. Not infrequently, discoveries in physics change history. Therefore, the great scientists and their discoveries, over the years, are still interesting and significant for people. Their work is relevant to this day.
Physics is the science of nature that studies the most general properties of the world around us. It studies matter (substance and fields) and the simplest and at the same time the most general forms of its movement, as well as the fundamental interactions of nature that control the movement of matter.
The main goal of science is to reveal and explain the laws of nature, which determine all physical phenomena, in order to use them for the purposes of practical human activity.
The world is cognizable, and the process of cognition is endless. The study of the world around us has shown that matter is in constant motion. Under the movement of matter understand any change, phenomenon. Consequently, the world around us is an eternally moving and developing matter.
Physics studies the most general forms of motion of matter and their mutual transformations. Some patterns are common to all material systems, for example, the conservation of energy - they are called physical laws.
So I decided to find out what are the interesting facts surrounding us that can be explained from the point of view of physics.
Here, for example, I found information about how many times you can fold a sheet of paper.

Video:
Files:
Expert evaluation results

Expert map of the interdistrict stage 2017/2018 (Experts: 3)

Average score: 1

0 points
The purpose of the work is not set, the tasks are not formulated, the problem is not identified.

1 point
The goal is outlined in general terms, the tasks are not formulated specifically, the problem is not identified.

2 points
The goal is unambiguous, the tasks are formulated specifically, the problem is not relevant: either it has already been solved, or the relevance is not substantiated.

3 points
The goal is unambiguous, the tasks are formulated specifically, the problem is identified, relevant; the urgency of the problem is justified.

Average score: 1.7

0 points
No review of the literature of the study area / area of ​​study is not presented.
There is no list of used literature.

1 point
The description of the research area is given.
The list of used literature is given, but there are no references to sources.
Sources are outdated, do not reflect the modern view

2 points

The sources cited are outdated and do not reflect the modern view.

3 points
An analysis of the research area is given, indicating the sources, links are formatted in accordance with the requirements.
The sources are relevant, reflect the modern view.

Average score: 1.7

0 points
1) There is no description of research methods.
2) There is no research plan.
3) There is no experimental scheme.
4) No sampling (if required).

1 point
Only one of the following is present:

2) Research plan.
3) Scheme of the experiment.
4) Sample (if required).

2 points
Only two of the following are present:
1) Description of research methods.
2) Research plan.
3) Scheme of the experiment.
4) Sample (if required).

3 points
The research methods, the research plan are given.
The scheme of the experiment is given.
The sample (if required) meets the sufficiency criterion.

Average score: 1.3

0 points
The study has not been conducted, the results have not been obtained, the tasks set have not been solved, the conclusions are not substantiated.

1 point
The study was carried out, the results were obtained, but they are not reliable.
Not all tasks have been completed.
The conclusions are not well founded.

2 points
The study was carried out, reliable results were obtained.

The conclusions are justified.
The value of the result obtained in relation to the results of predecessors in the area is not shown.

3 points
The study was carried out, the results were obtained, they are reliable.
All assigned tasks have been completed.
The conclusions are justified.
The value of the result obtained in relation to the results of predecessors in the region is shown.

Average score: 1.7

0 points
There is no understanding of the essence of the study, no personal contribution has been identified.
Low level of awareness in the subject area of ​​research.

1 point
There is an understanding of the essence of the study, personal contribution is not specific.
The level of awareness in the subject area of ​​the study does not allow confidently discussing the state of affairs on the issue under study.

2 points

He is well oriented in the subject area of ​​the study, which allows him to confidently discuss the state of affairs on the issue under study.

3 points
There is an understanding of the essence of the study, personal contribution and its significance in the results obtained are clearly indicated.
Freely oriented in the subject area of ​​research.
The further direction of research development is determined.

Average score: 1

1-2 points
The presented work really contains results that are significant for science (it has theoretical / practical significance), can be presented at scientific conferences, and it is recommended to prepare scientific publications on its basis.

Total points: 8.3

We have never been able to find the original source of this widespread belief: no sheet of paper can be folded twice more than seven (according to some sources - eight) times. Meanwhile, the current record for folding is 12 times. And what is more surprising, it belongs to the girl who mathematically substantiated this “mystery of the paper sheet”.

Of course, we are talking about real paper, having a finite, not zero, thickness. If you fold it carefully and to the end, excluding breaks (this is very important), then the “refusal” to fold in half is detected, usually after the sixth time. Less often - the seventh. Try doing this with a piece of notebook paper.

And, oddly enough, the limitation depends little on the size of the sheet and its thickness. That is, just take a larger thin sheet, and fold it in half, let's say 30 or at least 15 times - it doesn’t work, no matter how you fight.

In popular collections, such as "Do you know what ..." or "Amazing is nearby", this fact - that it is impossible to fold paper more than 8 times - can still be found in many places, on the Web and beyond. But is it a fact?

Let's reason. Each addition doubles the thickness of the bale. If the thickness of the paper is taken equal to 0.1 millimeters (we do not consider the size of the sheet now), then folding it in half “only” 51 times will give the thickness of the folded pack of 226 million kilometers. Which is an obvious absurdity.

World record holder Britney Gallivan and a paper tape folded in half (in one direction) 11 times (photo from mathworld.wolfram.com).

It seems that here we begin to understand where the well-known limitation of 7 or 8 times comes from (once again - we have real paper, it does not stretch to infinity and does not tear, but it will tear - this is no longer folding). But still…

In 2001, an American schoolgirl decided to come to grips with the problem of double folding, and this turned out to be a whole scientific study, and even a world record.

Actually, it all started with a challenge thrown by the teacher to the students: “But try to fold at least something in half 12 times!”. Like, make sure that this is from the category of completely impossible.

Britney Gallivan (note that she is now a student) initially reacted like Lewis Carroll's Alice: "It's useless to try." But after all, the Queen said to Alice: "I dare say that you did not have much practice."

So Gallivan took up the practice. Having suffered quite a bit with various objects, she folded a sheet of gold foil in half 12 times, which put her teacher to shame.


An example of folding a sheet in half four times. The dotted line is the previous position of the triple addition. The letters show that the points on the surface of the sheet are displaced (that is, the sheets slide relative to each other), and as a result, take a different position than it might seem at a cursory glance (illustration from pomonahistorical.org).

This girl did not calm down. In December 2001, she created a mathematical theory (well, or mathematical justification) for the process of double folding, and in January 2002 she did a 12-fold folding in half with paper, using a series of rules and several folding directions (for lovers of mathematics, a little more -).

Britney noticed that mathematicians had previously addressed this problem, but no one had yet provided a correct and proven solution to the problem.

Gallivan was the first person to correctly understand and justify the reason for the limits on addition. She studied the effects that accumulate when a real sheet is folded and the “loss” of paper (and any other material) on the fold itself. She obtained equations for the folding limit, for any given leaf parameters. Here they are.


The first equation refers to folding the strip in only one direction. L is the minimum possible length of the material, t is the thickness of the sheet, and n is the number of doubled folds. Of course, L and t must be expressed in the same units.

Gallivan and her record (photo from pomonahistorical.org).

In the second equation, we are talking about folding in different, variable directions (but still - twice each time). Here W is the width of the square sheet. The exact equation for folding in "alternative" directions is more complicated, but here is a form that gives a very realistic result.