Mikhail Flegontovich Vladimirsky-Budanov(May 15 (27) - March 24 (April 6) or (May 11 (23) - March 25 (April 7) - Russian historian, Doctor of Russian History, Ordinary Professor of the History of Russian Law at the Kiev University of St. Vladimir. Representative Russian school state studies.

Biography

Son of a village priest. He studied at the Venevsky Theological School, at the Tula Theological Seminary (graduated in 1857) and for three years at the Kyiv Theological Academy. With last year Academy in 1860 left and entered the Kyiv University of St. Vladimir - the Faculty of History and Philology, where he completed the course in 1864 with a candidate's degree. He was left as a scholarship holder to prepare for a professorship and, at the same time, in the same year he entered pedagogical courses, open at Kyiv gymnasiums. In 1865 he passed the master's exam.

national movement, which took place in the southwestern region, and the common Slavic ideas that occupied the South Russian intelligentsia, drew the attention of Vladimirsky-Budanov to Polish law in comparison with the common Slavic. On the basis of unpublished acts of the Kyiv Central Archive, he wrote and defended in 1869 his dissertation "German law in Poland and Lithuania" (), for which, in addition to a master's degree, he received the Uvarov Prize.

During the year he was abroad, where he listened to almost full course lectures by well-known jurists Vangerov and Bluntschli; when returning to Russia in the Königsber University Library, he got acquainted with a number of publications of German-Polish city law. Since 1870, he began to read at the Yaroslavl Law Lyceum as an extraordinary professor. general course on the history of Russian law, which included Western Russian law. At this time, he undertook the publication of his Reader on the History of Russian Law, guided by the idea of ​​making the necessary sources available to students (issues 1-3, Yaroslavl, 1872-1875). The topic of his doctoral dissertation was the attitude of the state to public education in Russia since the time of Peter I (Yaroslavl, 1874. - Part 1). After defending his dissertation “The State and Public Education in Russia XVII in." in Kharkov University in May 1874 he was approved for the degree of Doctor of Russian History.

In May 1875 he was appointed ordinary professor Kyiv University in the Department of the History of Russian Law, where he lectured until 1915.

Since 1882, he was the editor-in-chief in the Kyiv temporary commission for the analysis of ancient acts, and in 1887-1893 - chairman of the Historical Society of Nestor the Chronicler, of which he was a full member since 1875.

M. F. Vladimirsky-Budanov published a number of critical articles in the Kyiv University News and in the Collection of State Knowledge, and from 1887 he supervised the publication of the Settlement Acts southwestern Russia"(" Archive of Southwestern Russia", Part VII). To the first volume of this edition, compiled by Professor Antonovich, Vladimirsky-Budanov wrote a preface, and the second volume was compiled by him in full.

Proceedings

Major works M. F. Vladimirsky-Budanov, except for those mentioned:

• "The state and public education in Russia since the 17th century" (St. Petersburg, 1874)
• « Zemsky Sobors in the Muscovite State”, regarding the article by V.I. Sergeevich in the “Collection of state. knowledge "(" Kyiv. Univ. Izv. "1875);
• "On the obligatory public education in Russia” (“Pedagogical Museum”, 1876);
• "Code and Lithuanian statute”, about the “History of Codification” by prof. Pakhman (“Collection of state knowledge”, vol. VI).
• “Unpublished laws of the southwestern Slavs. Lawyer of the mountains Castes and the law of the Veprinskaya community” (“Journal of the Ministry of People's Education”, 1881);
• "Story Imperial University St. Vladimir”, vol. I: University of St. Vladimir in the reign of Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich (Kyiv, 1884);
• "Review of the history of Russian law" (Kyiv, 2nd ed., 1888);
• "The movement of the South Russian population in the era of Bogdan Khmelnitsky" ("Kyiv Starina", 1888, 7);
• "Features family law Western Russia” (“Reading in the Historical Society of Nestor the Chronicler”, book IV, Kyiv, 1890);
• "Forms of peasant land ownership in the Lithuanian-Russian State XVI in." (“Kyiv collection to help victims of crop failure”, Kyiv, 1892).

Full list works, see " biographical dictionary professors and teachers of the Imperial University of St. Vladimir" (ed.

In the preface to the 3rd edition of the Review of the History of Russian Law, we said:

“A real book, intended from the first edition of its learning goal, and retains the same meaning in the current edition. We would not want to confuse a textbook with a textbook: the first should only help the study of science, the second contains all the content of science that is mandatory for the student; in higher educational institutions the latter has no place.

The educational nature of the book determines its concept. It contains many headings and subdivisions, not because of the author's special predilection for them, but because of the need to focus the student's attention on the essential shades of thought or phases in the development of phenomena. These milestones, which point the way of thought for students, may seem like obstacles for a person who has already stopped learning. But, unfortunately, this book is not intended for these readers. Of course, it would be more pleasant for the author to draw whole pictures continuous movement rights in its mighty historical stream and swim along this stream without barriers and dams; but in educational book he is obliged to stop his impulse every minute and point out to the student at every step the meaning of the phenomenon encountered. It goes without saying that, speaking of a different, freer presentation of science, we do not mean a presentation of it "from a bird's eye view" (as they sometimes say), because a bird's eye view is devoid of perspective, and in a historical perspective the whole meaning of history.

However, this whole reservation is mainly due to the separation in our book of the history of criminal and civil law from the history of state law. This circumstance has already been explained in our previous editions: it is the result of our firm conviction (based on experience) that the first two plots cannot be taught to first-year students and must be separate subject teaching for more prepared students. The rest of the architecture of the book, with all headings and divisions, corresponds to the usual structure of historical and legal works: it is necessary to conduct separate speeches about the prince, the Duma, the Veche, administration, legislation, etc., and in each of these subjects the moments of their gradual development are indicated. (for example, veche - a tribal gathering - and veche - city ​​meeting– two very different phenomena; a thought consisting of boyars and elders, not like a thought of boyars alone; royal power under John IV and the royal power under Catherine II are somewhat different, etc.).

The author of this book did not consider himself entitled to evade objections when the controversies concern such essential questions of the history of law as the question of the origin of customary law (more precisely: law in general); about the forces that make state union(pp. 22–23); on the acquisition and transfer of supreme (princely) power (38–40); about forms supreme power: Duma and Veche (45–61); about the influence of the Mongolian state law into Russian (103–112); about the foundations of autocracy (that is, about its accidental or, conversely, its organic formation: 113–116); about the class significance of a serviceman, a class meeting - and a veche - a city meeting - two very different phenomena; a thought consisting of boyars and elders, not like a thought of boyars alone; royal power under John IV and royal power under Catherine II are somewhat different, etc.).

As for the content of the book, it is somewhat more complete than the previous edition, but not because it was filled with new materials, but because of the need to respond to new theories and opinions that have accumulated between its two editions: we did not at all set ourselves the idea of ​​filling our book with raw material. and did not pursue a wealth of factual data; we believe that such a content of the textbook would be very non-pedagogical, and besides, it would be pointless for us, because, next to this manual, there is another edition of ours, which combines the main sources of law in their entirety; here we only make references to them. The necessary chronicle material (hardly accessible to the student) is given in a moderate amount, and in this edition we decided, if possible, to separate it from the text into notes. The task of our work was not a collection of materials, but the possibly correct establishment of the norms that guided the life of previous generations - norms that are not always clearly expressed, and sometimes not at all expressed in the legislative monuments of that time. This makes it necessary to turn to factual material; but the facts are given only for the recognition of norms, and by no means for the sake of the facts themselves.

Keeping in mind the heavy responsibility to the young generations of students for the truth of the scientific statements fearing to offer them, instead of firm conclusions, something vacillating, doubtful and unproven, we were inevitably drawn into disagreement with many provisions that are found in the available historical and legal literature. We clearly see how inappropriate the polemic in study guide, however, we were forced to admit in many places objections to our respected colleagues in science, giving great honor to the work of some of them: it was not polemical enthusiasm that guided us, but the desire to get to the truth, especially in topics of great and essential importance.

The author of this book did not consider himself entitled to evade objections when the controversies concern such essential questions of the history of law as the question of the origin of customary law (more precisely: law in general); about the forces that form a state union (pp. 22-23); on the acquisition and transfer of supreme (princely) power (38–40); on the forms of supreme power: the Duma and the Veche (45–61); on the influence of Mongolian state law on Russian (103–112); about the foundations of autocracy (that is, about its accidental or, conversely, its organic formation: 113–116); on the class significance of the service class in the Muscovite state (118–133); on the grounds (economic or, on the contrary, legislative, or legal) for attaching peasants (139–151); about the organs of supreme power in the Muscovite state and, in particular, about the bodies that make the law (169–178); about the meaning and causes of the fall old Russian system representations (187 et seq.). We do not mention other more specific issues in the history of Russian state law (for example, the significance of the Supreme Privy Council: 255, the role of the Senate in comparison with the Boyar Duma: 257 and others).

ARTICLE from the ENCYCLOPEDIC DICTIONARY

F. A. BrockHAUSE and I. A. EFRON

VLADIMIRSKY-BUDANOV Mikhail FLEGONTOVICH - Doctor of Russian History, Ordinary Professor of the History of Russian Law at St.

Vladimir. The son of a village priest, he was born in 1838, studied at the Tula Theological Seminary, then at the Kyiv Theological Academy, and finally at the University of St. Vladimir, Faculty of History and Philology. Under the influence of the general mental movement of the sixties, which was also reflected in the Kiev University, which was then under the control of the trustee of the educational district N. I. Pirogov and the rector N. Kh. Bunge, Vladimirsky-Budanov became especially interested in the development of institutions in the field of Russian history he had chosen. In 1864, he completed a course at the university and in the same year entered the pedagogical courses opened at the Kyiv gymnasiums, according to N. I. Pirogov. The national movement that took place in the southwestern region, and the common Slavic ideas that occupied the southern Russian intelligentsia, prompted Vladimirsky-Budanov to pay attention to Polish law, in comparison with common Slavic law. He wrote, mainly on the basis of unpublished acts of the Kyiv central archive, "German law in Poland and Lithuania" (published in 1868 in the "Journal of the Ministry of National Education" and was awarded the Uvarov Prize from the Academy of Sciences). Having defended this dissertation for a master's degree (1869), Vladimirsky-Budanov received a one-year business trip abroad and in Russia. AT next year he began reading a general course on the history of Russian law at the Yaroslavl juridical lyceum, in which he also included Western Russian law. At the same time, he undertook the publication of his Christomathy on the History of Russian Law, guided by the idea of ​​making the necessary sources available to students (three editions, 1st edition - Yaroslavl, 1872-1875; 4th edition, 1st edition - Kyiv, 1889; 3rd edition, 2nd and 3rd issue - Kyiv, 1887 and 1889). The topic of his doctoral dissertation was the attitude of the state to public education in Russia since the time of Peter the Great (Yaroslavl, 1874). In 1875 he moved to Kyiv to the chair of the history of Russian law. Since 1882, he has been the editor-in-chief in the Kyiv temporary commission for the analysis of ancient acts, and since 1887, he has been the chairman of the historical society of Nestor the Chronicler. The most important works and publications of Vladimirsky-Budanov, in addition to those mentioned above: "The State and Public Education in Russia since the 17th Century" (St. Petersburg, 1874); “Zemsky Sobors in the Moscow State”, regarding the article by V. I. Sergeevich in the “Collection of State Knowledge” (Kyiv University News, 1875); “On the compulsory nature of public education in Russia” (“Pedagogical Museum”, 1876); “The Code and the Lithuanian Statute”, regarding the “History of Codification” by Professor Pachman (“Collection of State Knowledge”, vol. VI). Unpublished laws of the southwestern Slavs. "Lawyer of the mountains. Kastva and the law of the Veprinskaya community” (“Journal of the Ministry of National Education”, 1881); "History of the Imperial University of St. Vladimir”, vol. 1: University of St. Vladimir in the reign of Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich (Kyiv, 1884); "Review of the history of Russian law" (Kyiv, 2nd ed., 1888); “The movement of the South Russian population in the era of Bogdan Khmelnitsky (“Kyiv Starina”, 1888, No. 7); “Features of family law in Western Russia” (“Readings in historical society Nestor the chronicler", book IV, Kyiv, 1890); "Forms of peasant land tenure in the Lithuanian-Russian state of the XVI century." (“Kyiv collection to help victims of crop failure”, Kyiv, 1892). In addition, Vladimirsky-Budanov published a number of critical articles in the Kyiv University News and in the Collection of State Knowledge, and since 1887 he has been in charge of publishing the Acts on the Settlement of Southwestern Russia, Part VII). To the first volume of this edition, compiled by Professor Antonovich, Vladimirsky-Budanov wrote a preface, and the entire second volume was compiled by him. In 1867, A. Redrov published in Kyiv a geography course taught by Vladimirsky-Budanov at the Kyiv military gymnasium, under the title: "A Guide to the Study of the Russian Land and Its Population." For a complete list of the works of Vladimirsky-Budanov, see the Biographical Dictionary of Professors and Teachers of the Imperial University of St. Vladimir” (edited by V. S. Ikonnikov, Kyiv, 1884).

Or (May 11 (23) - March 25 (April 7) ) - Russian historian, Doctor of Russian History, Ordinary Professor of the History of Russian Law at the Kiev University of St. Vladimir.

Biography

Son of a village priest. He studied at the Venevsky Theological School, at the Tula Theological Seminary (graduated in 1857) and for three years at the Kyiv Theological Academy. He left the last year of the academy in 1860 and entered the Kyiv University of St. Vladimir - the Faculty of History and Philology, where he completed the course in 1864 with a candidate's degree. He was left as a scholarship holder to prepare for a professorship and, at the same time, in the same year he entered pedagogical courses opened at Kyiv gymnasiums. In 1865 he passed the master's exam.

The national movement that took place in the southwestern region, and the common Slavic ideas that occupied the southern Russian intelligentsia, drew the attention of Vladimirsky-Budanov to Polish law in comparison with common Slavic law. On the basis of unpublished acts of the Kyiv Central Archive, he wrote and defended in 1869 his dissertation "German law in Poland and Lithuania" (), for which, in addition to a master's degree, he received the Uvarov Prize.

During the year he was abroad, where he listened to an almost complete course of lectures by well-known jurists Vangerov and Bluntschli; when returning to Russia in the Königsber University Library, he got acquainted with a number of publications of German-Polish city law. Since 1870, he began to read at the Yaroslavl Legal Lyceum as an extraordinary professor a general course on the history of Russian law, in which he included Western Russian law. At this time, he undertook the publication of his Reader on the History of Russian Law, guided by the idea of ​​making the necessary sources available to students (issues 1-3, Yaroslavl, 1872-1875). The topic of his doctoral dissertation was the attitude of the state to public education in Russia since the time of Peter I (Yaroslavl, 1874. - Part 1). After defending his dissertation "The State and Public Education in Russia in the 17th century." at Kharkov University in May 1874 he was approved for the degree of Doctor of Russian History.

In May 1875 he was appointed tenured professor at Kyiv University in the Department of the History of Russian Law, where he lectured until 1915.

Since 1882, he was the chief editor in the Kyiv temporary commission for analyzing ancient acts, and in 1887-1893 he was chairman of the Historical Society of Nestor the Chronicler, of which he was a full member since 1875.

M.F. Vladimirsky-Budanov published a number of critical articles in the Kyiv University News and in the Collection of State Knowledge, and from 1887 he supervised the publication of the Acts on the Settlement of South-Western Russia (Archive of South-Western Russia, part .VII). To the first volume of this edition, compiled by Professor Antonovich, Vladimirsky-Budanov wrote a preface, and the second volume was compiled by him in full.

Proceedings

The main works of M.F. Vladimirsky-Budanov, except for those mentioned:

• “State and public education in Russia since the 17th century” (St. Petersburg, 1874)
• “Zemsky Sobors in the Moscow State”, regarding the article by V.I. Sergeevich in the “Collection of State. knowledge "(" Kyiv. Univ. Izv. "1875);
• “On the compulsory nature of public education in Russia” (“Pedagogical Museum”, 1876);
• “The Code and the Lithuanian Statute”, regarding the “History of Codification” by prof. Pakhman (“Collection of state knowledge”, vol. VI).
• “Unpublished laws of the southwestern Slavs. Lawyer of the mountains Castes and the law of the Veprinskaya community” (“Journal of the Ministry of People's Education”, 1881);
• "History of the Imperial University of St. Vladimir”, vol. I: University of St. Vladimir in the reign of Emperor Nikolai Pavlovich (Kyiv, 1884);
• "Overview history Russian law" (Kyiv, 2nd ed., 1888);
• "The movement of the South Russian population in the era of Bogdan Khmelnitsky" ("Kyiv Starina", 1888, 7);
• “Features of family law in Western Russia” (“Reading in the Historical Society of Nestor the Chronicler”, book IV, Kyiv, 1890);
• "Forms of peasant land tenure in the Lithuanian-Russian state of the XVI century." (“Kyiv collection to help victims of crop failure”, Kyiv, 1892).

For a complete list of works, see the Biographical Dictionary of Professors and Teachers of the Imperial University of St. Vladimir" (ed.